Meat Industry in Poland
-
Upload
veronika-zdanovich -
Category
Investor Relations
-
view
261 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Meat Industry in Poland
Meat Industry in Poland
To proof the Polish meat industry is attractive for portfolio investment
Where? Poland
In what? Meat Industry
To whom? Portfolio investors, who are interested in long term investment.
Why Poland?
Q1-200
9
Q2-200
9
Q3-200
9
Q4-200
9
Q1-201
0
Q2-201
0
Q3-201
0
Q4-201
0
Q1-201
1
Q2-201
1
Q3-201
1
Q4-201
1
Q1-201
2
Q2-201
2
Q3-201
2
Q4-201
2
Q1-201
3
Q2-201
3
Q3-201
3
Q4-201
3580000600000620000640000660000680000700000720000740000
0.00%0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%
GDP of Poland, 2009-2013
Poland Growth rate
2009
Jan
2009
Mar
2009
May
20
09Ju
l 20
09Se
p
2009
Nov
20
10Ja
n 20
10M
ar
2010
May
2010
Jul
2010
Sep
2010
Nov
2011
Jan
2011
Mar
20
11M
ay
2011
Jul
2011
Sep
2011
Nov
2012
Jan
2012
Mar
20
12M
ay
2012
Jul
2012
Sep
2012
Nov
2013
Jan
2013
Mar
20
13M
ay
2013
Jul
2013
Sep
20
13No
v 20
14Ja
n
-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%
Relationship between interest rates and infla-tion, 2009-2014
Inflation Long-term interest rate Short-term interest rate
• World’s 14th most attractive country for investments 2013-2015;
• 24th GDP in the world;
• Cheap labor cost (7.1 €/hour);
• Low taxation (19%);
• Stable S&P A-; Moody’s A2.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Volatility of exchange rate, 2008-2014
Change of EUR-PLN Volatility of EUR-PLN
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
Volatility of exchange rate, 2008-2014
Change of RU-PLN Volatility of RU-PLN
Why Poland?• 4th biggest meat producer within EU;
• Main trading partners – countries of EU.
Ger-many15%
UK9%
Czech Repub-
lic6%
France5%
Russia3%
Italy8%
Nether-lands7%
China4%
Others44%
Structure of meat export to main trading partners, 2013
Domestic Polish meat market in 2013
27,9 % of the food sector sales
2 344 thousand tons
47 248 zl billion
71,7 kg per capita
Capabilities ThreatsThe market has been stable for the past 5 years A strong downward trend of pork and beef meat
The increasing tendency of production of poultry Animal diseases and infections
Price of Polish meat is about 30% lower than in EU Growth of average market prices of beef and pork meat
Per capita consumption of meat can reach 80 kg by 2015
Strong dependence of animal feeding costs, weather, climatic conditions and possible environmental pollutions
Expected growth of demand of more quality meat products
Embargo from countries-members of Commonwealth of States
The growing import of meat products to China and other Asian countries
The strong strong concentration of the market
The BCG matrix
Low Market Share High
Low
Th
e gr
owth
of s
ales
H
igh
1% 2% 8% 19,5% 20% 21% 24% 50%
2
%
6
%
7%
1
0%
11
%
34
%
118%
The growth of sales
Market Share
Indykpol 2% 19,5 %
Henryk Kania 34% 8%
KANvsIND
KANvsINDFinancial Ratios 2008-2013
INDyear
P/E bv/share p/b ratio
2008 46,09 0,54
2009 17,49 50,25 0,93
2010 54,99 50,57 1,29
2011 20,00 52,81 0,86
2012 51,21 0,73
2013 3,14 52,58 0,69
KAN year
P/E bv/share p/b ratio
2008 7,82 0,93 0,92
2009 16,14 1,40 2,94
2010 8,64 1,47 2,30
2011 2,99 7,07 0,22
2012 34,47 1,09 1,65
2013 32,66 1,22 3,21
KAN&IND vs WIG20
Er(WIG20) = CAGR = (P1/P0)^(1/y) -1 = 10,07%
Source: ft.com
INDvsWIG20E(r)
14%
SML
ß
rf=3,7%
1.78
Er(market) = CAPM= 15,03%
Er(IND) = CAGR = 14, 09%OVERpriced!
IND
*Corr coef highly positive = 0,6
E(r)
12.5%SML
ß
rf=3,7%
0.9
Er(market) = CAPM= 9,43%
Er(IND) = CAGR = 12,53% UNDERpriced!
+ 3,1%
*Corr coef low positive = 0,22
KAN
Impact of external factors on the volatility of Kania and IndykpolVolatility of Indykpol = 0.015768 + 0.071756*RESID(-1)^2 + 0.915586*GARCH(-1) + + 0.672698*EUR + 54.59582*RUB - 0.000104*FTSEFOOD + 0.004149*CACFOOD - 0.000296*WIG20 - 0.000630*MICEXCPG
Volatility of ZM Henryk Kania = 0.000683 + 0.151850*RESID(-1)^2 + 0.757839*GARCH(-1) + 1.37E-05*CACFOOD - 1.17E-05*WIG20 -0.015299*EUR
Indykpol Henryk KaniaMICEX CPG -0.000630 EUR -0.015299EUR 0.672698 CAC FOOD 1.37E-05RUB 54.59582 WIG 20 -1.17E-05WIG 20 --0.000296
FTSE FOOD 0.000104
CAC FOOD 0.004149
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (Hungary)
AGROFERT HOLDING AS
(CZ)
Penta (Slovakia)
Tönnies ( Germany)
Vion Food (Germany)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
IndykPol (Poland)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Total Assets, million USD
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (H
ungary)
AGROFERT HOLD
ING AS (CZ)
Penta (Slovakia)
Tönnies ( G
ermany)
Vion Food (Germ
any)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
IndykPol (Poland)
020406080
100120140160180
Market Capitalization, million USD
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (H
ungary)
AGROFERT HOLD
ING AS (CZ)
Penta (Slovakia)
Tönnies (Germ
any)
Vion Food (Germ
any)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
IndykPol (Poland)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Net Income, million USD
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (H
ungary)
AGROFERT HOLD
ING AS (CZ)
Penta (Slovakia)
Tönnies (Germ
any)
Vion Food (Germ
any)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
IndykPol (Poland)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Revenue, million USD
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130.000
0.500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
Current ratio
Henryk Kania (Poland) IndykPol (Poland)
Agroton (U
kraine)
Bonafarm
(Hungar
y)
AGROFERT H
OLDING AS (
CZ)
Penta
(Slova
kia)
Tönnies
(Germ
any)
Vion Food (G
erman
y)
Henryk
Kania (
Poland)
IndykPol (P
oland)
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.0001.2001.4001.6001.8002.000
Current Ratio 2013
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-0.5000
-0.4000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
0.2000
0.3000
Operating Profit Margin
Henryk Kania (Poland) IndykPol (Poland)
Agroton (U
kraine)
Bonafarm
(Hungar
y)
AGROFERT H
OLDING AS (
CZ)
Penta
(Slovak
ia)
Tönnies
(Germ
any)
Vion Food (G
erman
y)
Henryk
Kania
(Poland)
IndykPol (P
oland)
0.0000
0.0500
0.1000
0.1500
0.2000
0.2500
0.3000
0.3500
Operating Profit Margin 2013
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-0.1000
-0.0500
0.0000
0.0500
0.1000
0.1500
0.2000
0.2500
0.3000
Net Profit Margin
Henryk Kania (Poland) IndykPol (Poland)
Agroton (U
kraine)
Bonafarm
(Hungar
y)
AGROFERT H
OLDING AS (
CZ)
Penta
(Slovak
ia)
Tönnies
(Germ
any)
Vion Food (G
erman
y)
Henryk
Kania
(Poland)
IndykPol (P
oland)
0.0000
0.0500
0.1000
0.1500
0.2000
0.2500
0.3000
0.3500
Net Profit Margin 2013
Agroton (U
kraine)
Bonafarm
(Hungar
y)
AGROFERT H
OLDING AS (
CZ)
Penta
(Slova
kia)
Tönnies
(Germ
any)
Vion Food (G
erman
y)
Henryk
Kania
(Poland)
IndykPol (P
oland)
0.0000
0.0200
0.0400
0.0600
0.0800
0.1000
0.1200
0.1400
Return on Assets 2013
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130.0000
0.5000
1.0000
1.5000
2.0000
2.5000
3.0000
3.5000
4.0000
Debt to Equity
Henryk Kania (Poland) IndykPol (Poland)
Agroton (U
kraine)
Bonafarm
(Hunga
ry)
AGROFERT H
OLDING AS (
CZ)
Penta
(Slovak
ia)
Tönnies
(Germ
any)
Vion Food (G
erman
y)
Henryk
Kania
(Poland)
IndykPol (P
oland)
0.0000
0.5000
1.0000
1.5000
2.0000
2.5000
3.0000
3.5000
Debt to Equity 2013
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-0.2000
-0.1500
-0.1000
-0.0500
0.0000
0.0500
0.1000
0.1500
0.2000
0.2500
Return on Assets
Henryk Kania (Poland) IndykPol (Poland)
Indyk Pol (Poland)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (Hungary)
AGROFERT HOLDING AS
(CZ)
Penta (Slovakia)
Tönnies (Germany)
Vion Food (Germany)
012345678
WACC
Indyk Pol (Poland)
Henryk Kania (Poland)
Agroton (Ukraine)
Bonafarm (Hungary)
AGROFERT HOLDING AS (CZ)
Penta (Slovakia) Tönnies (Germany) Vion Food
(Germany)
WACC 5,42 5,82 7,95 3,60 3,28 2,34 2,71 1,49
E, thousands USD 53652 45385,33333 62604 14815 35453 37781 123644,46 42167,574
D, thousands USD 99508 75271,33333 63625 30698 78800 112424 219887,68 140475,36
D+E, thousands USD 153160 120656,6667 126229 45513 114253 150205 343532,14 182642,934
Return on equity 14 12,5 15,970 11,000 10,500 9,200 7,500 6,350
Return on debt 0,0478624 0,06179422 0,072 0,035 0,044 0,044 0,032 0,037
% debt 0,64969966 0,62384728 0,504044237 0,674488608 0,689697426 0,748470424 0,640078917 0,769125621
% equity 0,35030034 0,37615272 0,495955763 0,325511392 0,310302574 0,251529576 0,359921083 0,230874379
Tax,% 19 19 16 19 19 23 30,175 30,175
Why it is worth to invest: What are the risk factors:• Polish meat industry has potential to growth,
especially in area of poultry• It is due to the increasing trend of meat consumption
• In comparison to European firms, financial performance of Indykpol and Henryk Kania is competitive
• Better than companies from Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine
• Slightly worse than German representatives
• Portfolio Investment in Polish meat industry could be profitable, hence, some firms (such as Henryk Kania) are underpriced
• It offers a higher return than market with the same level of risk
• According to ratio analysis, Indykpol is more attractive than Henryk Kania, which can be explained by Kania’s recent split of shares
• However, split of shares is a sign of Henryk Kania’s long term growth strategy
• Prices of shares are influenced by external factors• Especially stocks of Indykpol
• It could be caused by the fact that this firm is more exposed to the foreign markets
• Polish meat industry has to face the problem with current embargo in Russia and CIS countries
• It could have negative impact on financial performance of Polish firms
• Polish firms have to find new markets
• Law regulations and provisions increase the operating costs of meat industry
• Management of Polish companies should increase return on assets and decrease debt