Slide 1

Measuring Exercise and Motivating Spine Patients Christy C. Tomkins-Lane, PhD Visiting Associate Professor Department of Orthopedic Surgery Stanford University

Slide 2

Primary goals for intervention Patient Satisfaction Decreased pain/symptoms Improved function

Slide 3

Associated Outcomes Patient Satisfaction - Satisfaction/QOL scales Decreased pain/symptoms - Pain and symptom scales Improved function - Physical function scales

Slide 4

Associated Outcomes Patient Satisfaction - Satisfaction/QOL scales Decreased pain/symptoms - Pain and symptom scales Improved function - Physical function scales

Slide 5

Inaccurate and imprecise Subject to multiple biases and external influences Measures often highly inter-related Demand for ways to quantify change & value

Slide 6

Associated Outcomes Patient Satisfaction - Satisfaction/QOL scales Decreased pain/symptoms - Pain and symptom scales Improved function - Accelerometry, VO2max testing

Slide 7

Function Complex concept Historically challenging to measure When measuring function, it is important to assess the two distinct components: performance and capacity.

Slide 8

Performance and Capacity Capacity reflects the ability to complete a given task in a controlled environment (e.g. a walking test, strength). Performance reflects actual physical activity in the context of ones day to day life. Performance: Identifies barriers to function Impact of pathology on real life

Slide 9

Slide 10

Measuring Performance Performance has historically been measured with inaccurate self-report instruments. We are now able to objectively measure performance -Mobile technology -Physical activity monitors

Slide 11

How are we using these monitors? Until recently, primarily limited to fitness Clinical applications have begun: Assess outcomes of interventions Monitor rehabilitation programs Gait analysis Balance and falls risk assessment Sleep, heart rate, skin temperature Limited application so far in clinical care!

Slide 12

Slide 13

Evaluating limitations Evaluate performance in LSS, hip and knee OA Patients with degenerative musculoskeletal disorders suffer limitations in performance compared to healthy controls Objective assessment is feasible More precise information vs. self-report Winter et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.Winter et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Oct 12;11

Slide 14

Evaluating outcomes: epidural Changes in performance following epidural injection for LSS Significant improvements in self-reported physical function, general health, symptoms No significant improvements in performance Perceived change > objective change Identify need for post-intervention rehabilitation? Tomkins-Lane et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.Tomkins-Lane et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;93(11):2008-14

Slide 15

Predicting performance Predictors of performance in LSS, low back pain and controls Body mass index Pain Female gender Age Predictors of performance were independent of pathology implications for management? Tomkins-Lane et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.Tomkins-Lane et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):647-53.

Slide 16

Risk assessment Relationship between low back pain, performance and obesity Increased BMI is a risk factor for low back pain Physical activity (performance) mitigates back pain risk more so in overweight and obese Smuck et al. NASS 2013

Slide 17

How else can we use mobile tech?

Slide 18

Motivating Change

Slide 19

Successful e-health interventions Tailoring (individual) and targeting (group) Self-management (use of personal information for reflective self-management and monitoring of health behaviour) Social context and support Contacts with intervention Entertainment Aesthetics Usability What is common here???? Morrison et al. 2012

Slide 20

All can be accomplished using mobile tech!

Slide 21

Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition Lifestyle Intervention

Slide 22

Spinal stenosis example. Pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention for overweight and obese LSS patients Objective assessment through accelerometers as bio-feedback to motivate lifestyle change

Slide 23

Lifestyle Intervention Assess physical activity at baseline using accelerometry and VO 2max test Provide personalized physical activity recommendations (e.g. steps per day) Provide activity monitor (pedometer, phone application, accelerometer) Ongoing prompts, biofeedback and contests (if desire) Ongoing assessment and adjustment

Slide 24

Self-management at home! People love tech Constant feedback At your fingertips Multiple variables can be tracked Puts people in charge of their own care

Slide 25

Other applications..

Slide 26

Timing of intervention

Slide 27

Predicting success

Slide 28

Goals for intervention Patient Satisfaction Decreased pain/symptoms Improved function

Slide 29

Using mobile technology. Change Measure Motivate MeasureMotivate

Slide 30

Thank you! Christy C. Tomkins-Lane, PhD clane@mtroyal.ca