Measurement Systems Analysis Webinar - Industry Forum · PDF file11/03/2015 ·...
Transcript of Measurement Systems Analysis Webinar - Industry Forum · PDF file11/03/2015 ·...
• During presentation (11:00 – 11:30) everyone will be muted so that only the presenter will be heard.
• The presentation will be followed by a 30 minute Q&A session.
• Recording will be made available after the webinar on the Industry Forum website.
• If you are experiencing any technical problems please call us on 0121 717 6620.
ISO9001: 2015 “Where monitoring and measuring is used as evidence of conformity of products and services to specified requirements the organisation shall determine the resources needed to ensure valid and reliable monitoring and measuring results”
“Measuring instruments shall be verified or calibrated at specified intervals or prior to use against measurement standards traceable to international or national measurement standards”
The Automotive Core Tools
Design FMEA
Process FMEA
Product/ProcessCharacteristics
Control Plan
Standard Operations
Statistical Process Control
MeasurementSystems Analysis
Product approval Process
(e.g. PPAP)
7.6.1 Measurement System Analysis
Statistical studies shall be conducted to analyse the variation present in the results of each type of measuring and test equipment system. This requirement shall apply to measurement systems referenced in the control plan. The analytical methods and acceptance criteria used shall conform to those in customer reference manuals on measurement systems analysis. Other analytical methods of acceptance criteria may be used if approved by the customer”
9
135
140
143
188
203
208
275
292
328
796
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
7.5.1.4 Preventive & predictive maintenance
7.5.1.1 Control plan
6.2.2 Competence, awareness and training
7.5.1.3 Verification of job set ups
7.6.1 Measurement system analysis
7.5.1 Control of production
7.3.6.3 Prodcut approval process
7.6 Control of measuring & measurement devices
8.2.4 Monitoring & measurement of product
8.5.2 Corrective action
Calibration
A set of operations that establish, under specified operating conditions, the relationship between a measuring device and a traceable standard of a known reference and uncertainty.
Done in internal (7.6.3.1) or external laboratory (7.6.3.2)
Calibration
“The organisation shall assess the validity of previous measurements results when the equipment is found not to conform to requirements. The organisation shall take appropriate action on the equipment and any product affected”
Assess risk!
Sources of measurement system variationWork piece(Part)
Instrument(Gauge)
Person(Appraiser)
Method Environment
MEASUREMENTSYSTEMVARIABILITY
Typical reasons for an MSA study
• There is a new manufacturing process.
• There is a new product to manufacture.
• There is new equipment.• There are customer
concerns.• There are internal quality
issues• To meet customer specific
requirements
Developing an effective calibration and MSA strategy
• Ensure all equipment used to monitor and measure evidence of conformity of products is calibrated
• Determine the different types of measuring systems used (variable and attribute)
• Determine the most appropriate types of MSA studies for each type
• Undertake studies• Evaluate results• Review calibration frequencies and adjust based on
risk
Average and range method
Not acceptable. Every effort should be made to
improveOver 30%
May be acceptable based on importance of application, cost of
repairs etc10% ‐ 30%
Generally considered to be acceptableUnder 10%
NDC
The measurement system can be used for analysis of the process
NDC = 5 or more
The data can be divided into high and low I.e attribute control
NDC = 2
The measurement system cannot differential one part from another ‐ not suitable to measure the process
NDC less than 2
Number of Distinct Categories
Reference standards
A reference for comparison, normally determined under laboratory conditions or using a more accurate instrument.
StabilityPart Number Issue Machine Type Characteristic Operation Sample Size Chart Number
C 5 1Part Name Machine Number Section Specification Code / Location Sample Frequency Date Control Limits Calculated
25 PART Mar-31
1 71.0 69.5 73.5 71.0 69.2 68.7 68.8 73.5 72.8 71.6 69.1 68.6 69.0 69.0 70.3 74.0 69.6 69.0 68.3 67.2 70.5 69.2 68.7 68.8 71.6
2 72.0 68.5 70.0 71.0 68.8 70.7 69.3 69.5 66.7 71.5 70.1 70.0 69.5 69.7 68.8 72.8 68.7 70.7 71.2 69.9 72.0 68.8 70.7 69.3 71.5
3 71.5 71.0 72.5 70.5 69.1 71.1 71.7 70.0 71.1 73.3 69.2 70.9 69.1 70.2 70.1 70.8 70.2 71.6 70.2 70.5 71.4 69.1 71.1 71.7 73.3
4 72.0 72.0 71.5 71.0 70.1 72.6 69.4 70.4 71.8 73.6 69.1 71.9 73.1 71.4 71.8 72.5 71.9 71.4 71.1 72.6 70.5 70.1 72.6 69.4 73.6
5 73.0 71.0 67.5 73.0 70.4 71.2 68.6 70.3 72.4 68.4 70.8 69.8 72.7 70.2 71.6 70.1 71.3 68.6 71.3 73.0 72.0 70.4 71.2 68.6 68.4
359.5 352.0 355.0 356.5 347.6 354.3 347.8 353.7 354.8 358.4 348.3 351.2 353.4 350.5 352.6 360.2 351.7 351.3 352.1 353.2 356.4 347.6 354.3 347.8 358.4
71.90 70.40 71.00 71.30 69.52 70.86 69.56 70.74 70.96 71.68 69.66 70.24 70.68 70.10 70.52 72.04 70.34 70.26 70.42 70.64 71.28 69.52 70.86 69.56 71.68
2.00 3.50 6.00 2.50 1.60 3.90 3.10 4.00 6.10 5.20 1.70 3.30 4.10 2.40 3.00 3.90 3.20 3.00 3.00 5.80 1.50 1.60 3.90 3.10 5.20Constants for n = 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 D2 = 2.326
8:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 D3 = 0
20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 D4 = 2.11
A2 = 0.58
STATUS
LogTime
Date
Sig
1sd = R/d2 Cpk = Range
RESULTS
COMPONENTS
Cpk = minimum of :-
Cpu = USL - X Cpl = X - LSL
= =
X Sum
X Bar
68.62 0
RANGE R
LCLX LCLR
= X - A2R = D3R
72.64 7.31
UCLX UCLR
= X + A2R = D4R
3.46AVERAGE X BAR
CHART ANALYSIS
X R
70.63
PIPE A 70mm +/- 5mm
X5678 MULTITRON OVERALL LENGTH BEND
66.00
67.00
68.00
69.00
70.00
71.00
72.00
73.00
74.00
75.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
3sd 3sd
R
X
UCL
LCL
UCL
LCL
33
Measuring System
Attribute/ variable
R&R Bias Linearity Stability Attribute
0‐25mm Micrometer
V X X X X
25‐50mm Micrometer
V X X X X
0‐150mm Vernier
V X
CMM V X X X
Vickers hardness
V X X X
Shadowgraph V X
Go/No go A X
Visual A X
How can MSA reduce calibration costs?
• Effective use of Measurement System Analysis data can be a justification to extend calibration frequency without any increase in risk
• Early identification of equipment damage or drift can reduce the risk of shipment of nonconforming parts
How can MSA reduce calibration costs?Example:
Micrometer used to measure a special characteristic calibrated annuallyLinearity and Stability studies implementedTwo reference standards createdOperator measure reference standards at beginning of each shiftResults analysed
Based on confidence calibration interval extended to every two years
Calibration cost halved
Training and Support• 5 day Core Tool Certification Course
– Includes case studies, and knowledge and application exam
– Certification from SMMT
• 1 day modules on each of the core tools
Training held at SMMT Industry Forum, Birmingham or in-house
For more information visit www.industryforum.co.ukor call 0121 7176614