Martin, Jessica E . (2015) Humane mechanical methods for ...
Measure of Opportunity (Jessica Martin at Data Day 2015)
-
Upload
metropolitan-area-planning-council -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
135 -
download
1
Transcript of Measure of Opportunity (Jessica Martin at Data Day 2015)
-$80,000
$20,000
$120,000
$220,000
$320,000
$420,000
20002013
WAG E A N D I N C O M E D I V I D E H A S D E E P E N E D
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 or more
BO S T O N ’ S H O U S E H O L D S H AV E B E C O M E M O R E P O L A R I Z E D S I N C E 2 0 0 8
C A N A C I T Y E X T E N D T H E B E N E F I T S O F
E C O N O M I C S U C C E S S T O A L L O F I T S
R E S I D E N T S & N E I G H B O R H O O D S ?
C A N I T R E TA I N A V I B R A N T M I X O F I N C O M E , E T H N I C & A G E D I V E R S I T Y
E V E N A S I T AT T R A C T S H I G H E R I N C O M E R E S I D E N T S ?
C A N I T C R E AT E P AT H W AY S T O E D U C AT I O N A L & E C O N O M I C S U C C E S S
F O R A L L I T S Y O U N G P E O P L E ?
O P P O R T U N I T Y
P R O S P E R I T Y
W E L L - B E I N G
S O C I A L & E C O N O M I C M O B I L I T Y
INTRA-GENERATIONAL
Change in one’s social/economic
positioning within a lifetime
Birth
Adulthood
Adulthood
INTER-GENERATIONAL
S O C I A L & E C O N O M I C M O B I L I T Y
INTER-GENERATIONAL
A person’s social/economic
standing compared to their parents’
standing at the same ageParents
Adult Child
INTRA-GENERATIONAL
S O C I A L & E C O N O M I C M O B I L I T Y
Parents
Adult Child
ABSOLUTE
Actual movement in lifetime, across
generations
S O C I A L & E C O N O M I C M O B I L I T Y
RELATIVE
Individual’s position compared to peers
with similar experience
S O C I A L & E C O N O M I C M O B I L I T Y
Birth Age 5 Age 11 Age 19 Age 29 Age 40
100%
67% 71%
59%68% 64%
100%
45% 49%
31%
44% 43%
LIFETIME SUCCESS BASED ON LEVEL OF ADVANTAGE AT BIRTH
Advantaged at Birth Disadvantaged at Birth
Birth Age 5 Age 11 Age 19 Age 29 Age 40
100%
67% 71%
59%68% 64%
100%
45% 49%
31%
44% 43%
LIFETIME SUCCESS BASED ON LEVEL OF ADVANTAGE AT BIRTH
Advantaged at Birth Disadvantaged at Birth
Birth Age 5 Age 11 Age 19 Age 29 Age 40
100%
67% 71%
59%68% 64%
100%
69% 67%
37%
59% 58%
SUCCESS GAP AFTER PROVEN INTERVENTIONS
Advantaged at Birth Disadvantaged at Birth
SAN JOSE: 12.9%
SAN FRANCISCO: 12.2%
WASHINGTON DC: 11%
SALT LAKE CITY: 10.8%
SEATTLE: 10.9%
NEW YORK CITY: 10.5%
BOSTON: 10.5%
GREATERMOBILITY
LESS MOBILITY
Racial Segregation
Isolated Poverty
Commute Times
Proximity to High Quality Schools
Teen Labor Force Participation
Social Capital
Density of Single Parent Households
Suffolk County:-0.31% every year
Middlesex County:+0.39% every year
Causal Exposure Effects on Future EarningsFor every year spent living in a place, how does that impact future earnings?
classroom successstandardized test scoreshigh school graduation
employabilityearning potential
lifetime wealth creation
% of 3 & 4 Year Olds Enrolled in School59.3%
% of Pop. with an Associate’s Degree or Higher49.7%
(early opportunity) (educational attainment)
Median Income$53,583
Unemployment Rate4.7%
inequalitypurchasing power
povertyhousingnutrition
GINI Index .53
accessible & equitable city
(employment) (income & wealth) (neighborhood strength)