ME 7502 – Lecture 2 Effective Properties of Particulate and...
Transcript of ME 7502 – Lecture 2 Effective Properties of Particulate and...
• Concepts from Elasticity Theory• Statistical Homogeneity, Representative Volume
Element, Composite Material “Effective” Stress-Strain Relations
• Particulate composite effective moduli• Unidirectional composite effective moduli• Lamina failure theories• Lamina constitutive relations
ME 7502 Lecture 2 1
ME 7502 – Lecture 2Effective Properties of Particulate and
Unidirectional Composites
ME 7502 Lecture 2 2
CONCEPTS FROM ELASTICITY THEORY
• STRESS AND EQUILIBRIUM– SURFACE TRACTION AND STRESS– STRESS EQUILIBRIUM
• DISPLACEMENT AND STRAIN– NORMAL AND SHEAR STRAIN, TENSOR STRAIN– STRAIN COMPATIBILITY
• LINEAR ELASTIC STRESS-STRAIN-TEMPERATURE RELATIONS
– ISOTROPIC MATERIALS– ORTHOTROPIC MATERIALS– TRANSVERSELY-ISOTROPIC MATERIALS
ME 7502 Lecture 2 3
STRESS AND EQUILIBRIUM
DEFINITION OF STRESSSURFACE TRACTION
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTED FORCE ON THE CUT SURFACE OF A STRUCTURE
ME 7502 Lecture 2 4
SURFACE TRACTION VECTOR ON A PLANE AT A POINT
kTjTiTAFT zyxA ++=
∆∆
= →∆ 0lim
T - EXPRESSED IN FIXED GLOBAL COORDINATES X, Y, Z
∆A - Infinitesimal area
T not perpendicular to surface, not parallel to n
ME 7502 Lecture 2 5
TRACTION AS “SURFACE STRESS” NORMAL AND PARALLEL TO THE SURFACE
nTn
•=σ
knjninn zyx
++=
),cos( inni = zyxi ,,=
222tnT σσ +=
22nt T σσ −=
tnT tn
σσ +=
t
nnTtσσ
−=
where,
since
Therefore, the tangential unit vector t is
ME 7502 Lecture 2 6
STRESS AT A POINT
POINT IS SURROUNDED BY A BOX WHOSE SIDES ARE PARALLEL TO COORDINATE AXES
+X FACE: OUTWARD NORMAL IS IN +X DIRECTION
-X FACE: OUTWARD NORMAL IS IN –X DIRECTION
…ETC.
ME 7502 Lecture 2 7
SURFACE TRACTION COMPONENTS ON RECTANGULAR VOLUME ELEMENT SURROUNDING POINT DEFINE STRESS
AND, SINCE , ETC.,
,xxxx σσ =−− yzzy −−= σσ
xyyx σσ = yzzy σσ = xzzx σσ =
xxxx σσ =
jiij σσ =
∴ INDEPENDENT STRESS COMPONENTS REDUCE TO 6
STRESS TENSOR IS SYMMETRIC
FROM FORCE EQUILIBRIUM:
FROM MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM:
ETC.
ME 7502 Lecture 2 8
COMPONENTS OF STRESS AT A POINT IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECTANGULAR CARTESIAN COORDINATES:
NOTE THAT ),,( zyxijij σσ =
• NORMAL STRESS COMPONENTS ALWAYS OCCUR ON AN ELEMENT IN PAIRS
• SHEAR STRESS COMPONENTS OCCUR IN QUADRUPLES
• IF THE MAGNITUDE AND SENSE OF A STRESS COMPONENT ON ONE FACE IS KNOWN, THE SAME STRESS COMPONENT WILL ALSO BE KNOWN ON OTHER FACES ON WHICH IT ACTS.
ME 7502 Lecture 2 9
MATRIX REPRESENTATION OF STRESS:
[ ]
=
=
=
zzyzxz
yzyyxy
xzxyxx
zzyzxz
yzyyxy
xzxyxx
zzzyzx
yzyyyx
xzxyxx
στττστττσ
σσσσσσσσσ
σσσσσσσσσ
σ
SIGN CONVENTION FOR STRESS COMPONENTS:
FACE OUTWARD DIRECTION OF STRESS SIGN OF STRESSNORMAL DIRECTION COMPONENT COMPONENTS
POSITIVE (+) POSITIVE (+) POSITIVE (+)NEGATIVE (-) NEGATIVE (-) POSITIVE (+)NEGATIVE (-) POSITIVE (+) NEGATIVE (-)POSITIVE (+) NEGATIVE (-) NEGATIVE (-)
SYMMETRY DIFFERENT NOTATION
ME 7502 Lecture 2 10
DIFFERENTAL EQUATIONS OF STRESS EQUILIBRIUM
ME 7502 Lecture 2 11
IF NO BODY FORCES,
GET
0
0
0
3
33
2
23
1
13
3
23
2
22
1
12
3
13
2
12
1
11
=∂
∂+
∂∂
+∂
∂
=∂
∂+
∂∂
+∂
∂
=∂
∂+
∂∂
+∂
∂
xxx
xxx
xxx
σσσ
σσσ
σσσ
=∂
∂
j
ji
xσ
OR
0=∂
∂
j
ij
xσ
DIFFERENTAL EQUATIONS OF STRESS EQUILIBRIUM
ME 7502 Lecture 2 12
SURFACE ELEMENT EQUILIBRIUM
ME 7502 Lecture 2 13
DISPLACEMENT AND STRAIN
DEFINITION OF DISPLACEMENT
DISPLACEMENT
kwjviuu
u
++=
= DISPLACEMENT VECTOR u = x-component of displacement
v = y-component of displacement
w = z-component of displacement
ME 7502 Lecture 2 14
STRAIN &STRAIN-DISPLACEMENT EQUATIONS
ME 7502 Lecture 2 15
STRAIN-DISPLACEMENT EQUATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 16
STRAIN-DISPLACEMENT EQUATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 17
STRAIN COMPATIBILITYDISPLACEMENTS MUST BE SINGLE-VALUED & CONTINUOUS (NO
HOLES OPEN IN THE STRUCTURE; 2 PARTICLES OF MATTER CANNOT OCCUPY SAME SPACE AT SAME TIME)
STRAINS MUST BE DERIVABLE FROM SINGLE-VALUED, CONTINUOUS DISPLACEMENTS (COMPATIBLE)
CONSIDERING EQUATIONS (3) TO (5), IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE VALUESOF εx, εy, AND γxy SUCH THAT WHEN (3) TO (5) ARE INTEGRATED TO OBTAIN u(x,y) and v(x,y), A UNIQUE SOLUTION CANNOT BE OBTAINED.
THEREFORE, THERE MUST BE SOME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN εx, εy, AND γxy. CONSIDERING (5):
∴
IN TENSOR FORM, THE COMPATIBILITY EQUATIONS ARE:
EQUATION (9) REPRESENTS A TOTAL OF 81 (34) EQUATIONS; HOWEVER, ONLY SIX ARE INDEPENDENT.
ME 7502 Lecture 2 18
6 INDEPENDENT STRAIN COMPATIBILITY EQUATIONS:
COMPATIBILITY EQUATIONS ARE EQUIVALENT TO STRAIN-DISPLACEMENT EQUATIONS, AND GIVE NO NEW INFORMATION
2
2
2
222
2
2
2
222
2
2
2
222
2
2
2
2
2
2
zxzxzx
yzzyzy
xyyxyx
yxzzyx
xzyyzx
zyxxzy
xxzzxzxz
zzyyyzyz
yyxxxyxy
xzyzxyzz
yzxyxzyy
xyxzyzxx
∂∂
+∂
∂=
∂∂∂
=∂∂
∂
∂∂
+∂
∂=
∂∂
∂=
∂∂
∂
∂
∂+
∂∂
=∂∂
∂=
∂∂
∂
∂
∂+
∂
∂+
∂
∂−
∂∂
=∂∂
∂
∂
∂+
∂
∂+
∂∂
−∂∂
=∂∂
∂
∂
∂+
∂∂
+∂
∂−
∂∂
=∂∂
∂
εεγε
εεγε
εεγε
εεεε
εεεε
εεεε
ME 7502 Lecture 2 19
ELASTIC MODULI
LINEAR ELASTIC STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONS
+temp incr ∆T
Coefficient of linear thermal expansion αΑ = εΑ/∆T εΑ
∆T
αΑ
1
ME 7502 Lecture 2 20
IMPORTANT POINTS FOR ISOTROPIC OR ORTHOTROPIC MATERIALS (PRINCIPAL MATERIAL AXES)
1. UNIAXIAL NORMAL STRESS σA CAUSES NORMAL STRAINS. FOREXAMPLE εA = σA/EA AND εT = -νATεA = -νATσA/EA
2. PURE SHEAR STRESS τAT CAUSES ONLY SHEAR STRAIN γAT (NO OTHER SHEAR STRESSES, NO OTHER SHEAR STRAINS)
3. UNIAXIAL NORMAL STRESS CAUSES ONLY NORMAL STRAINS (NO SHEAR STRAINS)
4. TEMPERATURE CHANGE ∆T CAUSES ONLY NORMAL STRAINS (NOSHEAR STRAINS)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 21
ISOTROPIC MATERIALS (CAST MATERIALS, MOST METALS)PROPERTIES ARE DIRECTION-INDEPENDENT
ONLY 1-E, 1-G, 1-ν, 1-α∴
GG
GG
GG
TEEE
TEEE
TEEE
xyxy
xyxy
zxzx
zxzx
yzyz
yzyz
yyxxzzzz
zzxxyyyy
zzyyxxxx
2,
2,
2,
τε
τγ
τετγ
τε
τγ
ασ
νσνσε
ασνσνσ
ε
ασνσ
νσε
==
==
==
∆+−−=
∆+−−=
∆+−−=OR
ijijkkijij TEE
δαδσνσνε ∆+−+
=1
NOTE: CAN PROVE THAT
(NO RELATION BETWEEN
E AND ν ALONE)
3 INDEPENDENT THERMOELASTICCONSTANTS
{ E, ν OR E, G OR ν, G OR K,G}
AND α
∴
)1(2 ν+= GE
)3/(9 GKKGE +=
ME 7502 Lecture 2 22
INVERTING PREVIOUS EQUATIONS YIELDS
xyxyxyxy
xzxzxzxz
yzyzyzyz
zzyyxxzzzz
zzyyxxyyyy
zzyyxxxxxx
GGGGGG
TE
TE
TE
ετγτετγτ
ετγτ
αννεεε
ννε
νσ
αννεεε
ννε
νσ
αννεεε
ννε
νσ
2,2,2,
211)(
211
211)(
211
211)(
211
====
==
∆
−+
−++−
++
=
∆
−+
−++−
++
=
∆
−+
−++−
++
=
OR
∆
−+
−−
++
= ijijkkijij TE δαννδε
ννε
νσ
211
211
ME 7502 Lecture 2 23
ORTHOTROPIC MATERIAL σ−ε RELATIONS
ME 7502 Lecture 2 24
ORTHOTROPIC MATERIAL σ−ε RELATIONS
ME 7502 Lecture 2 25
TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC MATERIALS
TL ααααα === 321 ,
TEEE
TEEE
TEE
TTT
TT
L
LT
TT
TT
TL
LT
LT
TL
L
∆++−−=
∆+−+−=
∆+−−=
ασσνσνε
ασνσσνε
ασσνσε
3213
32
12
321
1 )(
LL
LL
TT
GG
GG
GG
2,
2,
2,
1212
1212
1313
1313
2323
2323
τετγ
τετγ
τετγ
==
==
==
ME 7502 Lecture 2 26
ALSO, AS WITH GENERAL ORTHO,
T
TL
L
LT
EEνν
=
7 INDEPENDENT THERMOELASTIC CONSTANTS:
2 E’S, 1or2 G’S, 2or1 ν’s, 2 α’s
AN APPROXIMATION: MOST TRANSVERSELY-ISOTROPIC COMPOSITES HAVE GL~GT
SINCE T.I. PROPERTIES ARE NOTDIRECTION-DEPENDENT, )1(2 TTT GE ν+=
ME 7502 Lecture 2 27
Anisotropic material properties: calculation using phase (fiber or
particulate) and matrix properties
EFFECTIVE COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
• Statistical Homogeneity: to calculate effective properties, it is first necessary to introduce a representative volume element (RVE), which must be large compared to typical phase region dimensions (i.e., reinforcement diameters and spacing)
RVE must be large enough so that average stress in RVE is unchanged as size increases:
28ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Effective properties of a composite material define relations between averages of field variables σ and ε
Cijkl* and Sijkl
* are reciprocals of one another
Overbars denote RVE averages
29ME 7502 Lecture 2
EFFECTIVE COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
PARTICULATE REINFORCED COMPOSITE MODULI
• Provided dispersion of particulate reinforcement is uniform, and provided orientation of non-spherical particulates is random, stress-strain relations of such composite materials will be effectively isotropic– Two independent elastic moduli– For convenience, these are selected to be the bulk
modulus (K) and the shear modulus (G)– All other elastic constants can be defined in terms of K
and G
ME 7502 Lecture 2 30
• Effective elastic constants of particulate reinforced composites are obtained using multi-phase material solutions from elasticity theory
• Exact solutions are possible only in the case of spherical particles
• Approximate (bounding theory) results are used for other cases, such as non-spherical particles
• Example of a lower bound result is Arbitrary Phase Geometry (APG) lower bound on G*
ME 7502 Lecture 2 31
)43(5)2(61
*
mmm
mmm
mi
im
GKGGKv
GG
vGG
++
+−
+≥
PARTICULATE REINFORCED COMPOSITE MODULI
ME 7502 Lecture 2 32
RESULTS OF BOUNDING THEOREMS FOR PARTICULATE REINFORCED COMPOSITE MATLS
Best lower bound is from Arbitrary Phase Geometry (APG) boundBest upper bound is from Composite Spheres Assemblage (CSA) bound
ME 7502 Lecture 2 33
• We are first interested in finding effective properties of a unidirectional composite (ply)
• Unidirectional composite is transversely isotropic
• x2x3 plane is plane of isotropy
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Material stiffness matrix for a transversely isotropic material is
There are 5 independent elastic constants and 2 independent CTE’s
34
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• The σ−ε relations of a transversely isotropic material are frequently written as
35
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• For the unidirectional composite subjected to a homogeneous stress state (e.g., uniform tension), states of stress and strain are not uniform but highly complex
• Variations of stress and strain on any transverse plane are random– No reason that one plane should be different from another, other
than statistical variation
• Such a material is statistically homogeneous, which allows the definition of effective elastic properties to be specified by relations between average stress and average strain– Unidirectional composite is statistically transversely isotropic due
to the random placement of fibers in the ply or lamina
36
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
Effective σ−ε
relations of a
lamina:
37
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
COMPOSITE CYLINDERS ASSEMBLAGE MODEL
• Micromechanical methods are used to compute the effective elastic properties of a unidirectional composite material in terms of fiber and matrix properties and these phase volume fractions– Composite Cylinders Assemblage (CCA) model is
used for axial properties– Generalized Self-Consistent Scheme (GSCS) is used
to calculate transverse properties
CCA model
GSCS model
38
ME 7502 Lecture 2
PHILOSOPHY OF CCA MODEL
• Unidirectional composite is considered as an assemblage of composite cylinders– Varying diameters but constant
df / dm ratio• Properties of homogeneous
cylinder which can be used to replace each heterogeneous cylinder provide the effective lamina properties– 5 elastic, 2 CTE’s
Schematic of CCA model
39
ME 7502 Lecture 2
CONCEPT OF GENERALIZED SELF-CONSISTENT SCHEME (GSCS)
• Single composite cylinder is embedded in the model effective material
• Properties of effective material which satisfy continuity of displacements and tractions across interface between matrix (a<r<b) and effective material are sought
• Motivation for GSCS: CCA can only bound transverse properties of ply Schematic of GSCS
model
40
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Effective Elastic Properties are obtained by solving closed form solutions to Theory of Elasticity problems – Uniform stress states are applied to the two
(fiber and matrix) phase composite cylinder in cylindrical coordinates
– Details are provided in textbooks by Robert Jones, R.M. Christensen and others
41
UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITE PROPERTIES
ME 7502 Lecture 2
COMPLETE RESULTS OF CCA ANALYSES
1 = fiber; 2 = matrix42
ME 7502 Lecture 2
RESULTS OF CCA ANALYSES (cont’d)
1 = fiber; 2 = matrix43
ME 7502 Lecture 2
Composite material strength and failure
theories
44
ME 7502 Lecture 2
COMPOSITE STRENGTH & FAILURE THEORIES
• Unidirectionally reinforced composites are typically employed as lamina within laminates and thus are subjected to combined stress states– Stress state is at least plane stress– Therefore it is usually necessary to consider
strength of lamina under combined stress state
– Best approach is to consider analytical theory with limited number of experiments
45
ME 7502 Lecture 2
PRACTICAL LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION
• Fundamental assumption is that for plane stress state there exists a failure criteria of the form F(σ11, σ22, σ12) = 1
• Schematic representations are:
46
ME 7502 Lecture 2
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
Stress states inside curves (F<1) do not induce lamina failure
Stress states on or outside curves (F=1 or F>1) induce lamina failure
47
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Two common types of failure criteria– Maximum Stress / Strain– Quadratic Interaction
• Maximum Stress or Strain– Assumption is that failure occurs when any single
stress (or strain) component reaches its ultimate value, regardless of values of other components
– Advantages:• Very simple to use and allows failure modes to be identified
– Disadvantages:• Not necessarily realistic since it ignores stress interaction• It is sometimes not conservative, depending on stress state
σ1
σ2
48
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Quadratic Interaction Failure Criterion– General form is given by the equation
– Three popular forms of quadratic interaction:1) Tsai-Hill:
X = axial strength (tensile or compressive)Y = transverse strength (tensile or compressive)S = shear strength
F11σ112 + F22σ22
2 + F66σ122 + 2F12σ11σ12 + F1σ11 + F2σ22 = 1 (1)
(2)
49
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Quadratic Interaction Failure Criterion2) Tsai-Wu Failure Criterion uses
F11σ112 + F22σ22
2 + F66σ122 + 2F12σ11σ12 + F1σ11 + F2σ22 = 1
Requires bi-axial testing
Tsai-Wu is basically a curve fit and does not specify failure mode
(1)
(3)
50
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
(4)
51
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Quadratic Interaction Failure Criterion3. Hashin Failure Criteria
52
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
• Hashin Failure Criterion (cont’d)– Convenient method for examining failure criteria
experimentally is by means of off-axis specimens; here stress state is given by
– Testing in tension shows that for small off-axis angles, failure is in the fiber mode; for large angles, failure is by matrix mode
– Angle θo separating the two modes is found when (5) and (6) are satisfied simultaneously in terms of (7); result is
53
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
Off-axis test specimen
Hashin Criteria Failure Modes
54
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2
Performance of Hashin
Interaction Failure
Criteria (for Gl/Ep
composites)
55
LAMINA FAILURE CRITERION (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 56
USUALLY USE LAMINATED COMPOSITES IN PLATE OR SHELL FORM WHERE PRIMARY STRESSES ARE IN THE PLANE OF THE LAMINA (1-2) (PLANE STRESS). LAYER STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR THEN BECOMES:
∆
−
−−
−−
=
T
G
EE
EE
0200
011
011
2
1
12
22
11
12
2112
2
2112
212
1221
121
1221
1
12
22
11
αα
εεε
ννννν
ννν
νν
σσσ
∆
−
=
T
QQQQQ
00000
2
1
12
22
11
66
2212
1211
12
22
11
αα
εεε
σσσ
{ } [ ]{ } { }{ }TQ tt ∆−= 111 αεσ
OR
(D-2)
OR
DEFINE [Qt] MATRIX:
PLANE STRESS
[ ]
[ ]
1212
21112221221
222
12221111221
111
21
1
G
TE
TE
=
∆++−
=
∆++−
=
σ
αενενν
σ
αενενν
σ
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
ME 7502 Lecture 2 57
{ } [ ]{ } { } TS ttt ∆+= ασε 111
THE INVERSE STRAIN-STRESS RELATIONSHIP IS GIVEN BY
T
G
EE
EE
∆
+
−
−
=
0
2100
01
01
2
1
12
22
11
12
21
12
2
21
1
12
22
11
αα
σσσ
ν
ν
εεε
TS
SSSS
∆
+
=
00000
2
1
12
22
11
66
2212
1211
12
22
11
αα
σσσ
εεε
(D-3)
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 58
CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS IN OFF-AXIS (X,Y) LAMINATE COORDINATES HAVE
WANT
{ } [ ]{ } { }{ }TQ tt ∆−= 111 αεσ
{ } [ ]{ } { }{ }TQ txttx ∆−= αεσx
y
θx1x2
a. TRANSFORMATION OF STRESS AND STRAIN
STRESS
xy
τxy
σx
σyτx’y’
σx’σy’
θ
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 59
ENGINEERING STRAIN
TENSOR STRAIN
)(22 22
22
22
nmmnmn
mnmn
mnnm
xyyxyx
xyyxy
xyyxx
−++−=
−+=
++=
′′
′
′
γεεγ
γεεε
γεεε
)(
2
2
22
22
22
nmmnmn
mnmn
mnnm
xyyxyx
xyyxy
xyyxx
−++−=
−+=
++=
′′
′
′
εεεε
εεεε
εεεε
STRESS
)()sin(coscossin)(
2cossin2cossin
2cossin2sincos
2222
2222
2222
nmmnmn
mnmn
mnnm
xyyxxyxyyx
xyyxxyyxy
xyyxxyyxx
−++−=−+−=
−+=−+=
++=++=
′′
′
′
τσσθθτθθσστ
τσσθθτθσθσσ
τσσθθτθσθσσ
θθ sin,cos == nm
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 60
(D-4)
(D-5a, b) THEN
NOTE: (D-6)
THIS IS USED FOR STRESS AND TENSOR THERMOMECHANICAL STRAIN (WOULD NEED DIFFERENT IF ENGINEERING STRAIN!)[ ]e
CLT
[ ]
−−
−=−
22
22
22
1 22
nmmnmnmnmnmnnm
TCL
[ ]
−−−=
22
22
22
22
nmmnmnmnmn
mnnmTCL
{ } [ ]{ }xCL
x T σσ =′
{ } { } [ ] { } { }{ }TTT xtxtCL
txtx ∆−=∆− ′′ αεαε
DEFINE TENSOR 2-D TRANSFORMATION MATRIX
θθ sin,cos == nm
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 61
b. TRANSFORMED LAMINA STIFFNESS AND CTE MATRICES IF NO ∆T:
HAVE
WANT
KNOW
IF NO {σ}:
{ } [ ]{ }ttQ 11 εσ =
{ } [ ]{ }xttx Q εσ =
{ } [ ]{ }xCLT σσ =1
{ } { } Ttt ∆= 11 αε
{ } { } { } TT txtxt ∆=∆= ααε
{ } [ ]{ }xtCL
t T εε =1
SUB FOR 1 IN TERMS OF X:
[ ]{ } [ ][ ]{ }xtCL
txCL TQT εσ = [ ]{ } { } TT txt
CL ∆=∴ 1αε
MULT THRU BY [TCL]-1,
[ ] [ ]{ } [ ] { } TTTT tCL
xtCLCL ∆= −− 111 αε
{ } [ ] { } TT tCL
xt ∆=∴ − 11 αε
[ ] [ ]{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }xtCL
tCL
xCLCL TQTTT εσ 11 −− =
{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }xtCL
tCL
x TQT εσ 1−=∴
COMPARE WITH WANT
{ } [ ] { }tCL
t T 11 αα −=∴[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]CLt
CLt TQTQ 1−=∴ (D-7)
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 62
SUMMARY: IN OFF-AXIS (X,Y) LAMINATE COORDINATES
HAVE
WANT
{ } [ ]{ } { }{ }TQ tt ∆−= 111 αεσ
{ } [ ]{ } { }{ }TQ txttx ∆−= αεσx
y
θx1x2
TENSOR 2-D TRANSFORMATION MATRIX [ ]
−−−=
22
22
22
22
nmmnmnmnmn
mnnmTCL θθ sin,cos == nm
{ } [ ]{ }xCLT σσ =1
TRANSFORMATION EQUATIONS:
{ } [ ]{ }xtCL
t T εε =1
[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]CLt
CLt TQTQ 1−=∴
{ } [ ] { }tCL
t T 11 αα −=∴
STRESS AND STRAIN FROM LAMINATE TO LAYER COORDS
STIFFNESS AND CTE MATRICES FROM LAMINATE TO LAYER COORDS
LAMINA CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS (cont’d)
ME 7502 Lecture 2 63
T300/5208 Gr/Ep LAYER - FIND [0] LAYER PLANE STRESS [Q] AND [α] MATRICES ON-AXIS, AND OFF-AXIS FOR +45 AND -45 deg TO X-AXIS
EXAMPLE
MPaEMPaE3
2
31
103.1010181×=
×=MPaG 3
12
12
1017.728.0
×=
=ν16
2
161
1032106.0
−−
−−
°×=
°×−=
CC
α
α
LAYER THICKNESS t = 0.125mm ( ) 0159.028.0181
3.1012
1
221 === νν
EE
LAYER MATERIAL PROPERTIES:
X1
X2
X
Y
X
Y
ME 7502 Lecture 2 64
LAYER MATERIAL AXIS STIFFNESS MATRIX, [Qt] AND CTE MATRIX, [α]
{ } 16
6
2
1
010.32106.0
0
−−
−
−=
= Cx
xot α
αα
[ ] MPaQt 31034.1400
0346.10897.20897.281.181
×
=
LAYER TRANSFORMATION MATRICES [TCL]k
2145sin,
2145cos ±=±==±= nm
[ ]
−−=
−−−=+
01
12
2
21
21
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
45
nmmnmnmnmn
mnnmTCL [ ]
−
−=
−−
−=−
+
011
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
1
45
nmmnmnmnmnmnnm
TCL
[ ]
−
−=−
011
21
21
21
21
21
21
45CLT[ ]
−−=−
−
01
1
21
21
21
21
21
21
1
45CLTSIMILARLY,
[ ]( ) ( )
( ) ( )
−−
−−
=
12
2112
2
1221
212
2112
121
2112
1
200
011
011
G
EE
EE
Qtνννν
ννν
ννν
ME 7502 Lecture 2 65
LAYER OFF-AXIS STIFFNESS MATRICES [ ]tkQ
°+ 45 [ ] [ ] [ ][ ]
[ ] MPaQ
TQTQ
t
CLt
CLt
345
4514545
10
021
21
121
21
121
21
34.14000346.10897.20897.281.181
021
21
121
21
121
21
×
−
−
−
−
=
=
+
+−++
[ ] MPaQ t 345 10
18.9386.4286.4273.8566.5632.4273.8532.4266.56
×
=∴ +
SIMILARLY,
°− 45[ ] MPaQ t 3
45 1018.9386.4286.4273.8566.5632.4273.8532.4266.56
×
−−−−
=∴ −
ME 7502 Lecture 2 66
LAYER OFF-AXIS THERMAL EXPANSION MATRICES { }kα
( ) ( ) Cnmx °×=×+×−=+= −−− /107.15103221106.0
21 666
22
12 ααα
( ) ( ) Cmny °×=×−+×=+= −−− /107.15106.0211032
21 666
22
12 ααα
( ) ( ) Cmnxy °×=×−−
±=−= −− /103.1610326.0
21
21 66
21 ααα
{ } ,/103.16
7.157.15
645 C°×
−=∴ −
+α { } C°×
= −
− /103.167.157.15
645α
ME 7502 Lecture 2 67
IN MATHCAD,
α
6− 10 7−×
3.2 10 5−×
0
1K
=α
α1
α2
0
:=LAYER CTE MATRIX [α]
Q
181.811
2.897
0
2.897
10.346
0
0
0
14.34
GPa=Q
E1V
ν12E2V
⋅
0
ν21E1V
⋅
E2V
0
0
0
2 G12⋅
:=then
V 1 ν12 ν21⋅−:=let
LAYER MATERIAL AXIS STIFFNESS MATRIX [Qt] CTE MATRIX [α]
t 0.125 mm⋅:=LAYER THICKNESS:
α2 32 10 6−⋅ K 1−⋅:=ν21 0.01593=ν21E2E1
ν12⋅:=G12 7.17 GPa⋅:=E2 10.3 GPa⋅:=α1 0.6− 10 6−⋅ K 1−⋅:=
ν12 0.28:=E1 181 GPa⋅:=
GPa 1000 MPa⋅:=MPanewton
mm2:=LAYER MATERIAL PROPERTIES:
ME 7502 Lecture 2 68
LAYER TRANSFORMATION MATRICES [TCL]k
angle direction cosines m θ( ) cos θ deg⋅( ):= n θ( ) sin θ deg⋅( ):=
m 45( ) 0.707= n 45−( ) 0.707−=
T θ( )m θ( )2
n θ( )2
m θ( )− n θ( )⋅
n θ( )2
m θ( )2
m θ( ) n θ( )⋅
2 m θ( )⋅ n θ( )⋅
2− m θ( )⋅ n θ( )⋅
m θ( )2 n θ( )2−
:=
T 0( )
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
= T 45( )
0.5
0.5
0.5−
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
1−
0
= T 45−( )
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5−
1−
1
0
=
LAYER MATERIAL OFF-AXIS STIFFNESS MATRICES [Qbar]
Qbar θ( ) T θ( ) 1− Q⋅ T θ( )⋅:= Qbar 0( )
181.811
2.897
0
2.897
10.346
0
0
0
14.34
GPa=
Qbar 45( )
56.658
42.318
42.866
42.318
56.658
42.866
85.732
85.732
93.182
GPa= Qbar 45−( )
56.658
42.318
42.866−
42.318
56.658
42.866−
85.732−
85.732−
93.182
GPa=
ME 7502 Lecture 2 69
LAYER CTE MATRICES [αbar]
αbar θ( ) T θ( ) 1−α⋅:=
αbar 45( )
1.57 10 5−×
1.57 10 5−×
1.63− 10 5−×
1K
= αbar 45−( )
1.57 10 5−×
1.57 10 5−×
1.63 10 5−×
1K
=αbar 0( )
6− 10 7−×
3.2 10 5−×
0
1K
=