McNulty beech SilvicultureSeminar2017 - SUNY...
Transcript of McNulty beech SilvicultureSeminar2017 - SUNY...
7/19/2017
1
• Overview of beech ecology• Role as wildlife food and habitat• Spatio-temporal cycles and masting
• Population demographics• Predator-prey relations• Human-wildlife conflict
• Beech Bark Disease impact on forest system• Conclusions & Implications• Current Projects
7/19/2017
2
Thomson et al. 2013
7/19/2017
3
Northern Research StationForest Inventory and Analysis
7/19/2017
4
American BeechBasal Area per Acre
Northern Research StationForest Inventory and Analysis
Sawtimber, paper, firewood, ornamental tree
Wildlife valuesFoodCavities for nestingDowned wood
Oft-maligned species
7/19/2017
5
• Model predicted 37% decline in nut production from BBD
• Significant and widespread impacts on wildlife and forest
Costello 1992
02468
10
1948 1989 2030
Beechnuts x100,000/ha
?
BBD
↓ Large northern hardwoods dominating canopy
↑ Beech saplings
↑ More, smaller beech logs
↓ Recent beech snags
↑ Advanced stages of BBD
↑ Shrub richness
↑ Beech nut production trendMcNulty and Masters 2004
7/19/2017
6
Component Non-thicket Thicket
Mean beech sapling density (stems/m2)
0.12 0.55
Mean litter depth (cm) 1.48 2.25
Plant species 34 22
Fern species 12 6
Mean shrub species 6.5 1
Cale et al. 2012
• Beech thicket• Light levels lower; competition higher?• Dense, lignin-rich beech litter makes herb establishment difficult –
phytotoxic?
• Higher diversity• Non-thicket had a third more species• Caveat: mechanism that caused a thicket not studied (soil,
drainage, land use history…?)
7/19/2017
7
• Vertebrates – runways, refugia• Fungi, insects – decomposition rate• Woodpeckers, chickadees – cavity nests in snags
• About 40 species• Deer eat nuts, but rarely browse leaves
7/19/2017
8
• Hard mast
• Produced at age 40-60• Ripe in late August -
November
• Beech Mast Cycle • 2-8 years• Northeast = 2 year cycle• Weather affected
Pre-denning period of hyperphagy
Stored Cache• Non-hibernators • Torpor-employers
7/19/2017
9
Component Beech nut Oak Herbs Corn
Protein 11% 6% 16% 11%
Fat 17 14 4 3
Carbohydrate 30 61 40 80
Fiber 27 18 26 2
Elowe and Dodge 1989Beech nuts:1.2 - 6 x more fat!
• Lignin – difficult to digest• Secondary plant compounds
• Polyphenolics• Allelopathic, impacts sugar maple seedling
development
• Structural • Tough husk, seed coat
• Beech nuts vs. oak acorns Hane 2003
7/19/2017
10
7/19/2017
11
• Sow’s fat store winter influences number of cubs next spring
• Maine: 80% of sows reproduced after mast, 22% after poor nut year
• Beech mast density in the autumn before birth best explained annual Adirondack bear population size
Jakubas et al. 2005 LaMere et al. 2012
• Weasels, marten, fisher
7/19/2017
12
• Indirectly impacted by beech mast• Consume small mammals• Time lag for predators
• Owls• Raptors• Bobcats• Coyotes • Otters – direct!
Squirrels Deer Mice Jumping Mice Voles Shrews
7/19/2017
13
Blue Jays• Cache nuts up to 4 km away - can expand a tree's range
• Creates clusters of related beech• Chose 100% sound, green nuts vs. just
11% sound nuts hand-picked from tree
Ruffed Grouse• Overwinter survival
Turkeys• Increasing in northern regions
Johnson and Adkisson 1985
• Passenger pigeons ate beech nuts and acorns
Mott 1901
7/19/2017
14
• Unmanaged >300-year-oldnorthern hardwood forest
• Annual since 1988• Mid-November, 25 plots
• Five managed beech stands - 1989-present
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Beec
h M
ast P
rodu
ctio
n (s
ound
see
ds/h
a)
1-year lag (first order autocorrelation) = -0.544-year lag (fourth order autocorrelation) = 0.61
• Mast crop = 100x more nuts produced than during a mast failure
• Tree seed production synchronized (r = 0.48 – 0.64)
• Beech, sugar maple, mountain ash, conifers
7/19/2017
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Mic
e pe
r 100
Tra
p N
ight
s
Bee
ch n
uts
colle
cted
Beech nuts Mice
Conflict during nut crop failure
7/19/2017
16
7/19/2017
17
#
Adirondack Park
12
3
WildlifeManagementUnits
New York
Maine
New Brunswick
Consume • Small mammals• Nuts and berries• Birds, amphibians, etc.
• Impacted directlyand indirectly by beech masting
• Fur trappers’ data
7/19/2017
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Mea
n Sm
all M
amm
al C
atch
-per
-uni
t Eff
ort
(CPU
E; to
tal c
aptu
res/
100T
N)
~24,000 Trap-nights; 1992-2008Summer CPUE, all 8 species combined
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Cor
rela
tion
Coe
ffic
ent (
r)
American BeechSugar MapleConiferous Trees
7/19/2017
19
Marten/trapper Mean (SE)Mast Failure 1.82 (0.17)Intermediate Mast Crop 0.80 (0.14)Large Mast Crop 0.33 (0.04)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Mar
ten
Har
vest
Rat
e (m
arte
ns tr
appe
d/m
arte
n tr
appe
r)
y = -0.000004x + 0.473r 2 = 0.84, P < 0.0001
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000
American Beech Mast Production (sound seeds/ha)
Log(
Mar
ten
Harv
est R
ate)
(mar
tens
trap
ped/
mar
ten
trapp
er)
Harvest rates: strongly correlated with beech mast
7/19/2017
20
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Fish
er H
arve
st R
ate
(fish
ers
trapp
ed/s
ucce
ssfu
l fis
her t
rapp
er)
Central Adirondacks
Northern/SE NY
Harvest rates: weakly correlated with beech mast
y = -0.000003x + 4.194r 2 = 0.40, P = 0.008
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000
American Beech Mast Production (sound seeds/ha)
Fish
er H
arve
st R
ate
(fish
ers
trapp
ed/s
ucce
ssfu
l fis
her t
rapp
er)
7/19/2017
21
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Tota
l Fis
her H
arve
st (M
aine
/New
Bru
nsw
ick)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Tota
l Fis
her H
arve
st
(New
Yor
k; C
entra
l Adi
rond
acks
)
Marten
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Tota
l Fis
her H
arve
st (M
aine
/New
Bru
nsw
ick)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Tota
l Fis
her H
arve
st
(New
Yor
k; C
entra
l Adi
rond
acks
)
Fisher
7/19/2017
22
• Cycles in beech mast production initiated immediate and time-lagged effects on mustelids, their small mammal prey, bear demography…
• Animals’ reliance on beech nuts affected by alternate food sources (also competition, habitat quality…)
• Synchronicity in space and time – environmental factors
• BBD/nut model: correct for single trees; wrong on landscape scale
• Forest continues to change with BBD
• The cascading effects of an invasive disease complex can negatively affect the diversity of non-host species
• Monitoring mast availability can be used to predict animal populations and periods of human-wildlife conflict and to inform harvest regulations
• Trophic interactions are affected by the beech mast cycle, e.g.• Herbivore-carnivore relationships• Interguild relationships: fewer beech nuts predation of bird nests by mammals
7/19/2017
23
• Dominant sugar maple, yellow birch, white ash (& beech) being replaced by a less-diverse forest of degraded beech
• Soils are high-quality (Skerry, Becket series)
• Is mechanical control possible and feasible?
• Can desirable species be retained and promoted?
• At what price?
7/19/2017
24
Commercial beech control
Study treatment impacts on • Forest structure and composition• Vascular plant/epiphyte diversity• Beech seed production by tree• Microclimate • Wildlife taxa
• Bats• Small mammals• Songbirds
Caroline Byrne
The project is designed to meet the challenge of retaining and encouraging a desirable mix of forest species and structure for both ecosystem function and economic value.
7/19/2017
25
Mammal GridsTreatment, 1971Treatment, 1952Uncut ControlALTEMP Control
• Beech growth, mortality and reproduction• Management ramifications
• Which beech can be retained to produce nuts/wildlife value
• How long might a beech tree survive given its BBD rating
• Integrate management objectives
7/19/2017
26
Paul Jensen, DEC Region 5Walter Jakubas, Maine Dept. Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
Charlotte Demers and Ray Masters, SUNY ESF Adirondack Ecological Center
Greg McGee, René Germain, Shannon Farrell, and Ralph Nyland, SUNY ESF
Paul Jensen, DEC Region 5Walter Jakubas, Maine Dept. Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
Charlotte Demers and Ray Masters, SUNY ESF Adirondack Ecological Center
Greg McGee, René Germain, Shannon Farrell, and Ralph Nyland, SUNY ESF
7/19/2017
27
Cale, J., S. McNulty, S. Teale and J. Castello. 2013. The impact of beech thickets on northern hardwood forest biodiversity. Biological Invasions 15:699-706.
Costello, C. 1992. Black bear habitat ecology in the central Adirondacks as related to food abundance and forest management. M.S. Thesis. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, 165 pp.
Elowe, K.D. and W.E. Dodge. 1989 Factors affecting black bear reproductive success and cub survival. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:962-968.
Hane, E.N. 2003. Indirect effects of beech bark disease on sugar maple seedling survival. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:807-813.Jakubas, W. J., C. R. McLaughlin, P. G. Jensen, and S. A. McNulty. 2005. Alternate year beechnut production and its influence on bear and
marten populations. Pages 79-87 in Evans, C.A., J.A. Lucas, and M.J. Twery, eds. Beech Bark Disease: Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium. General Technical Report NE-331. Newtown Square, PA. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 149pp.
Jensen, P.G., C.L. Demers, S.A. McNulty, W. Jakubas, and M.M. Humphries. 2012. Marten and fisher responses to fluctuations in prey populations and mast crops in the northern hardwood forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 76:489-502. DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.322
LaMere, C. R., S. A. McNulty and J. E. Hurst. 2013. Human-black bear conflicts are related to mast production in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Proceedings of the Eastern Black Bear Workshop 2011.
McNulty, S. A. and R. D. Masters. 2005. Changes to the Adirondack forest: Implications of beech bark disease on forest structure and seed production. Pages 52-57 in Evans, C.A., J.A. Lucas, and M.J. Twery, eds. Beech Bark Disease: Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium. General Technical Report NE-331. Newtown Square, PA. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 149pp.
Mott, E. 1901. The Extinct Passenger Pigeon.The New York Times Published August 18 1901.Thompson, J. R., D. N. Carpenter, C. V. Cogbill, and D. R. Foster. 2013. Four Centuries of Change in Northeastern United States Forests. B.
Bond-Lamberty, editor. PLoS ONE 8:e72540.
7/19/2017
28