Mcn merged slides

107
Cross-departmental collaboration using 3D technologies at Yale Jason DeBlock Elena Torok Richard House Scott Williams Museum Computer Network Dallas, TX November 21, 2014

Transcript of Mcn merged slides

Page 1: Mcn merged slides

Cross-departmental collaboration

using 3D technologies at Yale

Jason DeBlockElena Torok

Richard HouseScott Williams

Museum Computer Network

Dallas, TX

November 21, 2014

Page 2: Mcn merged slides

Various Platforms for

Packing Applications

Jason DeBlockManager of Collections

Page 3: Mcn merged slides

INTRODUCTION

Case studies for packing and the

evolution of equipment

Page 4: Mcn merged slides

INTRODUCTION

Scanning Platforms

• Custom equipment

• NextEngine

• Kinect

• Go!Scan

Page 5: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

The Jacob Epstein - Venus

92 3/4 x 17 x 32 1/2 in

1917

Yale University Art

Gallery

Page 6: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

• Custom equipment

• Labor intensive

• Specialized

knowledge required

• Time prohibitive, but

functional

Page 7: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

NextEngine

• Great resolution at

~.06mm

• Inexpensive at ~$3000

• Very slow, labor

intensive processing.

Brass Lockplate

Mid 19th Century

~ 1.5 x 3 x .125 in.

Carved Architectural Elements from

the Appleton House, Bronx, New York

2008.137.1

Indian, 19th century, ca. 1891

Teak

Page 8: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

Microsoft Kinect

• Low resolution

~.12mm??

• Cheap! ~$200

• Serviceable for

packing

• Extremely fast

1929.418

Section of Mosaic Floor from south aisle of church

of Bishop Paul, i.e. Procopius Church

c. 526

~1.5 x 50 x 96 in.

Page 9: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

Creaform Go!Scan

Good resolution at ~.1mm

• Very easy to use

• Intuitive and quick

• Decent data acquisition of

traditionally difficult objects

• Unable to scan hair/feathers or

similar textures

• Pricey at ~$40,000

Egyptian Coffin Panel

23 x 9 3/4 x 2 1/4 in

Date unknown

Yale University Art

Gallery

Page 10: Mcn merged slides

YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

Comparison

Egyptian Coffin Panel

23 x 9 3/4 x 2 1/4 in

Date unknown

Yale University Art Gallery

NextEngine Creaform Go!ScanMicrosoft KinectPhotograph

Page 11: Mcn merged slides

MCN Annual Conference, Dallas, TX21 November 2014

3D SCANNING AND PRINTING AT THE YALE UNIVERSITY ART GALLERY

CONSERVATION APPLICATIONS

Elena TorokProject Conservator, Objects Conservation, Yale University Art Gallery

Page 12: Mcn merged slides

INTRODUCTION

Yale University Art Gallery

Conservation Department

Conservation

Department

Paintings

Objects

Paper

Curatorial

Departments

13

Image credits: Yale University Art Gallery, Yale Daily News

Page 13: Mcn merged slides

INTRODUCTION

Yale University Art Gallery

Conservation Move to Yale West Campus

Institute for the Preservation of

Cultural Heritage (IPCH)

Conservation Science Laboratories

Shared Imaging Facilities

YUAG Move (2015-2016)

Wurtele Collections Study Center

Shared Conservation Studios

Image credit: www.yalescientific.org

Page 14: Mcn merged slides

INTRODUCTION

OUTLINE

• Case Studies: 3D Scanning, Printing, and CNC Cutting at YUAG

Horse Armor from Dura-Europos (ca. 3rd century)

Lockwood de Forest’s Carved Teak Architectural Elements (ca. 1891)

Frederic Remington’s Wounded Bunkie (1896)

• Pros and Cons of these Technologies for Conservation

• Future Directions

Page 15: Mcn merged slides

CASE STUDIES

Page 16: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

1933.680 Before Treatment

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Carol Snow

Page 17: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

Ancient Gallery, Yale University Art Gallery

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 18: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

1930s Field Photograph1933.680 Before Treatment

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 19: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

Horse File Download: TurboSquid

(Edited Using MeshLab)

CASE STUDIES

Page 20: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

CNC (Computer Numeric Control) Cutting from Foam

CASE STUDIES

Page 21: Mcn merged slides

Creating a Mount for an Archaeological Panoply

Dura-Europos, Syria, ca. 165-256 A.D.

1933.680 After Treatment

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 22: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

2008.137.1

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 23: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

NY Architecture by Lockwood de Forest

from the Ahmedabad, India Workshop

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: www.acdfa.orgImage credit: www.daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com

Page 24: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

2008.137.1 Before Installation

CASE STUDIESIm

ag

e c

red

it: Ya

le U

niv

ers

ity A

rt Ga

llery

Page 25: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

3D Scanning Using Next Engine Scanner

(Meshing and Editing with Mesh Lab)

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: www.nextengine.com

Page 26: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

3D Scanning Using Next Engine Scanner

(Meshing and Editing with Mesh Lab)

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: www.nextengine.com

Page 27: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

CNC Cutting of Architectural Fills

CASE STUDIESIm

ag

e c

red

it: Ja

so

n D

eB

lock

Page 28: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

Finishing, Staining, and Assembly

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Jason DeBlock

Page 29: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

2008.137.1 After Installation

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 30: Mcn merged slides

Creating Fills for Lockwood de Forest Architectural Elements

from Appleton House, Bronx, NY, ca. 1891

2008.137.1 After Installation

CASE STUDIES

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

Page 31: Mcn merged slides

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Yale University Art Gallery

CASE STUDIES

1900.3 Before Treatment

Page 32: Mcn merged slides

Image credit: www.clarkart.edu

The Francine and Sterling Clark Art Institute, Williams College, MA

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Carol Snow

CASE STUDIES

Page 33: Mcn merged slides

The Francine and Sterling Clark Art Institute, Williams College, MA

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Carol Snow

CASE STUDIES

Page 34: Mcn merged slides

STL File Creation: 123D Catch

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Jason DeBlock

CASE STUDIES

Page 35: Mcn merged slides

3D Scanning:

Next Engine Scanner

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

CASE STUDIES

Page 36: Mcn merged slides

STL File Editing: MeshLab and Rhinoceros

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Jason DeBlock

CASE STUDIES

Page 37: Mcn merged slides

3D Printing: Selecting Methods and Materials

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Yale Center for Engineering, Innovation, and Design (CEID)

MakerBot

ObJet

Image credit: admissions.yale.edu

Internal Resources

Plastics Only

External Resources

Metals, etc.

CASE STUDIES

Image credits: Shapeways, ExOne

Page 38: Mcn merged slides

Rifle from Clark

Institute of Art Williams College, MA

Yale

3D Printed Rifle

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

CASE STUDIES

Page 39: Mcn merged slides

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Inpainting and Securing

Image credit: Laura Hartman

CASE STUDIES

Page 40: Mcn merged slides

Inpainting and Securing

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Image credit: Laura Hartman

CASE STUDIES

Page 41: Mcn merged slides

Image credit: Carol Snow

Treatment of The Wounded Bunkie

Frederic Remington, 1896

Future Directions

Helen Cooper,

Curator of American

Painting and

Sculpture

CASE STUDIES

Page 42: Mcn merged slides

PROS & CONS

Page 43: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

Page 44: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

Page 45: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

Page 46: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

Page 47: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

• Printed metals not as strong as cast metals

Page 48: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

• Printed metals not as strong as cast metals

• Artifacts of fabrication are still present on printed surfaces

Page 49: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

• Printed metals not as strong as cast metals

• Artifacts of fabrication are still present on printed surfaces

• Data management can be difficult

Page 50: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

• Printed metals not as strong as cast metals

• Artifacts of fabrication are still present on printed surfaces

• Data management can be difficult

• Software can be difficult to learn

Page 51: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Consof these technologies for Conservation

• Difficult to scan shiny, transparent, or metallic surfaces

• Objects cannot be coated or pinned with registration points

• Plastics are non-archival

• Printed metals not as strong as cast metals

• Artifacts of fabrication are still present on printed surfaces

• Data management can be difficult

• Software can be difficult to learn

• Equipment can be expensive

Page 52: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 53: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 54: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

• Software isn’t always difficult to learn

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 55: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

• Software isn’t always difficult to learn

• Scanning can allow for the creation of fills/mounts without actually

touching the object itself

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 56: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

• Software isn’t always difficult to learn

• Scanning can allow for the creation of fills/mounts without actually

touching the object itself

• Scanning allows for more thorough level of documentation

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 57: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

• Software isn’t always difficult to learn

• Scanning can allow for the creation of fills/mounts without actually

touching the object itself

• Scanning allows for more thorough level of documentation

• For metals, printing is less expensive than casting

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 58: Mcn merged slides

PROS AND CONS

• Equipment doesn’t always have to be expensive

• Software isn’t always difficult to learn

• Scanning can allow for the creation of fills/mounts without actually

touching the object itself

• Scanning allows for more thorough level of documentation

• For metals, printing is less expensive than casting

• STL files can be reused, if necessary

Prosof these technologies for Conservation

Page 59: Mcn merged slides

FUTURE

DIRECTIONS

Page 60: Mcn merged slides

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Directions

Page 61: Mcn merged slides

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Directions

• Using YUAG’s existing technologies for new applications

• GoScan and reflective/transparent surfaces

Page 62: Mcn merged slides

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Directions

• Using YUAG’s existing technologies for new applications

• GoScan and reflective/transparent surfaces

• Testing 3D-printed materials to understand more about their

fabrication and composition

Page 63: Mcn merged slides

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Directions

• Using YUAG’s existing technologies for new applications

• GoScan and reflective/transparent surfaces

• Testing 3D-printed materials to understand more about their

fabrication and composition

• Exploring new technologies

• Photogrammetry

• RTI

Page 64: Mcn merged slides

THANK YOU

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Page 65: Mcn merged slides

Yale University Art Gallery

Think BIGStart small

Using standard photography equipment

to enter the world of 3D

Reflectance Transformation Imaging

and Photogrammetry

Page 66: Mcn merged slides

Visual ResourcesDigital Imaging Department

Image Usage:

Open Access

Publication

Research

Documentation

Conservation

*DSLR system used for computational photography projects

Camera Systems:

Phase One Medium Format

digital backs

Phase One F/X Scanback

(In use for near IR captures)

Full Frame Canon DSLRs*

Page 67: Mcn merged slides

Yale West CampusShared Imaging Labs

Expanded studio spaces

Collaborative environment

Catwalk Studio 1 Infinity Corner- Studio 2

Page 68: Mcn merged slides

Cultural Heritage Imaging Training Workshops

Photos by Marlin Lum

©Cultural Heritage Imaging

Multi-day training sessions in

Reflectance Transformation

Imaging (RTI) and

Photogrammetry offered by

CHI introduced these

techniques to my department

www.culturalheritageimaging.org

Page 69: Mcn merged slides

Highlight RTI

Fixed camera, object and reflective spheres

Series of images with multiple light positions

Fixed light distance 3-4 x length of object

Sphere needs to fill 200 pixels of image*

Light positions create an arc between 15 and 65

degrees of a half sphere outlinePhoto by Marlin Lum

©Cultural Heritage Imaging

RTI build file of combined

highlight light positions detected

from a glossy black sphere

Page 70: Mcn merged slides

Conservation of a Panel Painting

Matteo di Giovanni

Hercules Slaying Antaeus

ca. 1470

Tempera on Panel

17 x 12 1/16 x 1 in.

1946.317

Yale University Art Gallery

Yale Art Gallery

Painting Conservator

Irma Passeri

Page 71: Mcn merged slides

Conservation’s most

frequent image requests*

Raking Ultraviolet Infrared

*Occasional requests for Specular and Transmissive light views

Page 72: Mcn merged slides

Default Viewing Mode Specular Enhancement

First RTI project at YUAGItalian Panel Painting- Before Treatment

Page 73: Mcn merged slides

Surface Details using RTI specular enhancement

Page 74: Mcn merged slides

First RTI project at YUAGItalian Panel Painting- Before Treatment

Default Viewing Mode Specular Enhancement

Page 75: Mcn merged slides

After Treatment

Default Viewing Mode Specular Enhancement

Page 76: Mcn merged slides

After Treatment

Default Viewing Mode Specular Enhancement

Page 77: Mcn merged slides

Piero di CosimoVirgin and Child with Saints Vincent Ferrer and Jerome

Analysis for Conservation Treatment

Piero di Cosimo

Virgin and Child with Saints Vincent

Ferrer and Jerome

Ca. 1510-1515

Oil on Panel

82 ½” x 80 ¾” 1 3/8”

1871.73

Yale University Art Gallery

Page 78: Mcn merged slides

This is NOT a

small painting!

Page 79: Mcn merged slides

We only did RTI details due to the

panel painting’s large size

Page 80: Mcn merged slides

Default Viewing Diffuse Gain

Specular Enhancement

Page 81: Mcn merged slides

Default Viewing

Page 82: Mcn merged slides

Diffuse Gain

Page 83: Mcn merged slides

Specular Enhancement

Page 84: Mcn merged slides

The Piero di Cosimo panel painting is currently being

treated in the conservation lab and will likely undergo

more RTI imaging as work progresses

Page 85: Mcn merged slides

Yale West Campus- Imaging Labs

Collaborative Lab space for RTI

45 light RTI dome purchased from Cultural Heritage Imaging

Page 86: Mcn merged slides

Roman in the ProvincesYale University Art Gallery Fall 2014

Associate Curator of Ancient Art Lisa Brody speaking

with visitors at the Roman in the Provinces exhibit

Page 87: Mcn merged slides

Intaglio of Diana

2nd Century A.D.

9/16 x 1/8 x 9/16 in

1932.1679

Yale University Art Gallery

Intaglio Project- Curator driven request

Yale Art Gallery “Rome in the Provinces” Exhibit

Carved Intaglio Gemstone

1st -3rd Century A.D.

5/16 x 1/2 in.

1986.100.35

Yale University Art Gallery

Page 88: Mcn merged slides

Typical Intaglio relief with modeling clay stamp

Intaglio with Carving of Tyche

2nd Century A.D.

7/16 x 11/16 x 3/16 in

1938.4332

Yale University Art Gallery

Could we create this impression virtually?

Remnants of clay seen here from the process

of making a stamp in modeling clay

Page 89: Mcn merged slides

RTI dome image capture for RTI

After working on the first Intaglio I

realized this was not going to turn out

the way I had hoped. While frustrated

in not getting the effect I was aiming

for, I unwittingly spoke to a Computer

Science post doc who graciously

offered up a creative solution

Page 90: Mcn merged slides

RTI23D*

Application

* RTI23D is a MATLAB code written by Ruggero Pintus, Post-Doc at

Yale’s Computer Science program. Ruggero modified this C++ code

from an older project he worked on for Photometric Stereo using

Scanning Electron Microscopes

Works from the 45 images and light

position file generated by RTI builder

This came about purely by

collaborative studio designs

and the RTI dome being

location across the hall from

the new 3D scanning lab at

Yale’s West Campus

Page 91: Mcn merged slides

The final RTI23D result is a .ply file The file was inverted using Meshlab and a

JPEG image of the positive surface was exported

Publication Image Virtual Positive

Page 92: Mcn merged slides

The final RTI23D result is a .ply file The file was inverted using Meshlab and a

JPEG image of the positive surface was exported

Physically Stamped Modeling Clay “Inaccurate” Virtual Positive

Page 93: Mcn merged slides

Resulting images are being used in the

exhibition catalog as well as online

Available for download via

Yale Art Gallery’s website

http://artgallery.yale.edu

All of the intaglio positives are printed in the

Roman in the Provinces catalog

Page 94: Mcn merged slides

3D printed LED Microscope RTI domeproject in progress

DIY project

Model created using free version of Autodesk 123D Design

3D printed on a Makerbot printer in ABS plastic

Led lights still need to be wired

Page 95: Mcn merged slides

Photogrammetry

Egyptian Coffin Panel

23 x 9 3/4 x 2 1/4 in

Date unknown

Yale University Art Gallery

Page 96: Mcn merged slides

Scanning and photography gear used in final comparisons

Camera gear:

Canon 5D Mk II, 580EXII Speedlite flash,ST-E2 trigger

Prime lenses- 28mm, 50mm macro and 100mm macro

Scanners used:

Xbox Kinect, NextEngine, GoScan

Page 97: Mcn merged slides

Photogrammetry

144 photos

RTI and RTI23D

44 photos

Page 98: Mcn merged slides

Photogrammetry: Agisoft Photo Scan Pro

Full color RGB data per pixel/averaged from matching points in source photographs

Having such quality RGB

data may mislead you

about what actual texture

and depth these models

have

Page 99: Mcn merged slides

Photogrammetry: Agisoft Photo Scan Pro

Does this model really have the texture of the wood grain?

Page 100: Mcn merged slides

Photogrammetry: Agisoft Photo Scan Pro

With the color turned off, we can now judge how much depth and texture is captured

Page 101: Mcn merged slides

RTI- Highlight Method

Page 102: Mcn merged slides

RTI23D model of coffin panel surface

Page 103: Mcn merged slides

RTI23D Point Cloud

view

Page 104: Mcn merged slides

Difficult material for photogrammetry and 3D scanning?Usually the same problems for both

• Highly reflective

• Transparent or translucent

• Small scale

• Deeply occluded areas

Brass Lock plate

Imaged on RTI dome

RTI23D generated .ply file

This project intends to produce a 3D printed brass replacement lockplate

The accuracy of measurement is not as important as look of final

Page 105: Mcn merged slides

Dense point cloud of Lock

Plate model- RTI23D

Page 106: Mcn merged slides

We know RTI and RTI23D does not

generate accurate data for measurement

but can record details at a much higher

level than our other techniques

RTI dynamic relighting

using specular

enhancement

Dense Point Cloud model

generated by RTI23D

Page 107: Mcn merged slides

Acknowledgements

Carol Snow

Ian McClure

John ffrench

Anthony DiCamillo

Beth Godcher

Helen Cooper

Susan Matheson

Lisa Brody

Ruggero Pintus

Holly Rushmeier and Yale Computer Science department

Chelsea Graham

Burrus Harlow

Kevin Gallup

MCN

Yale University Art Gallery

Clark Art Institute

Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI)