©McGill University Ideal Value Proposition for Professor Tenured & Tenure-Track Emine Sarigollu Non...
-
Upload
herbert-morgan -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of ©McGill University Ideal Value Proposition for Professor Tenured & Tenure-Track Emine Sarigollu Non...
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Professor
Tenured & Tenure-Track
Emine Sarigollu
Non Tenure-Track
Derek Hart
Page 2 ©McGill University
Faculty Statistics
Breakdown by Type
Tenured 24 34%Tenure-track 25 36%All Other 21 30%
70
Gender
Female 19 27%Male 51 73%
Breakdown by Type
All Other30%
Tenure-track36%
Tenured34%
Page 2 ©McGill University
Age
rf crf30 - 34 8 17% 17%35 - 39 13 27% 44%40 - 44 7 15% 59%45 - 49 4 8% 67%50 - 54 4 8% 75%55 - 59 7 15% 90%60 + 5 10% 100%Total 48
Tenure-track Cycle
1 - 3 10 43% 3 - 5 13 57%
23
Age(Tenure/Tenure-track)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 +
Age Category
Per
cen
tag
e
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Tenured & Tenure-Track
24 assistant profs
15 associate profs
9 full profs
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Balance between research & teaching
Optimize growth opportunities
Deliverables by the Faculty
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Balance between research & teaching
Flexibility--Teach all courses in one semester--Offer research oriented courses
--Smaller class sizes
Resources--TAs--Interface with practitioners
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Optimize growth opportunities = research support
Guidance --Information on renewal, tenure, merit process --Mentorship & collaboration
Capital --Conference funding, seed grants, research seminars --Fully-funded PhD program --Large capital for research
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Deliverables by the Faculty
• Direction & implementation
• Improved work environment
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Deliverables by the Faculty
• Direction & Implementation
1. Confirm mission is research & academic excellence
2. Provide clear direction – where now, where to
3. Provide concrete roadmap4. Implement now
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Deliverables by the Faculty
• Improved work environment
1. Intellectual--Transparency, fairness, responsibility,
community spirit, academic freedom (research & course delivery)
2. Financial--Competitive salaries
3. Physical facility--Building renovation & infrastructure
Page 2 ©McGill University
Ideal Value Proposition for
Tenure-Track Professor
Implications• Balance Between Research & Teaching-- flexibility,
resources • Optimize Growth Opportunities -- research support;
guidance, capital• Deliverables by Faculty -- direction & implementation,
improved work environmentIssues
• Capital -- for research & improved work environment• Implementation -- balance between flexibility & community
spirit• Implementation -- transparency, fairness, responsibility,
community spirit, academic freedom for improved work environment
• Communication & internal brandingNext Steps
• Linkage to ‘vision’, ‘research’, ‘teaching’, ‘internal organization’ & ‘internal communication’, etc.
Page 2 ©McGill University
E-mail To Faculty Lecturers
Emime Sarigollu and I have been asked to provide the one and half pager for.
the strategic initiative: Value Proposition for Professors.
In order to obtain feedback from members of the Faculty we are surveying a.
sample of the Professors. I know you are very busy but completing this survey.
would help ensure that our white paper reflects the Faculty opinion. The.
responses will be held in the strictest confidence and once I have striped out.
Your responses the actual e-mail will be deleted.
Page 2 ©McGill University
E-mail To Faculty Lecturers
As stated in the Dean's detailed living agenda, we are interested in youropinions concerning the three categories listed below.
1. The balance between research/teaching/practice2. Optimizing growth opportunities for Faculty members3. The deliverables by Faculty and Faculty members
We would ask you to list, in bullet form, the important issues relating toeach of the three categories listed above. It would help if you wouldarrange these issues in terms of importance (from the most important to theleast important). We are leaving the survey open-ended so as to get a fulland wide picture of Faculty needs. The easiest way to respond is to reply tothis email stating each category and then listing your thoughts.
Since the project is on a tight time schedule, I would ask that you attemptto reply to this e-mail by Sunday, March 30th.
Thanking you in advance.
Page 2 ©McGill University
Survey Analysis
Balance between Research/Teaching/Practice
FlexibilityBudgets 1
course co-ordination 1smaller class size 2course selection flex. 2
ResourcesTA's 3
Teaching seminars 8conference funding 5Database purchase 1
TeachingMore focus 1
ResearchEssential need 1Support for lecturers 3Funding 2
Workload Distributionresearch/teaching/practice 7
RecognitionLecturers 5Tenured 1Tenure-track
Contract Formality 750
Page 2 ©McGill University
Survey Analysis
Optimizing growth opportunities for Faculty members
Guidance
Collaboration 2Task forces 1Mentoring 3
CapitalFunding conferences 2Funding Research 2
More Inputscheduling 1
AdministrationLecturers bigger role 2Re-structure 2
MeritReward Innovation 1Reward A-publishing 1Extra adm role 1
Privatizing 2
International 222
Page 2 ©McGill University
Survey Analysis
Deliverables by the Faculty & Faculty member
Standards Teaching & Research 2
Job SecurityLecturers 1
Develop RelationshipBusiness 1Alumni 1Government 1
Road map 1
Promote Fairness 1
Academic Freedom 1
Promote Mutual 1 Respect
Recognize excellence 2
Improve Salaries 1Environment 1Communication 1
Fund raising 1
Develop Revenue Programs 1
17
Page 2 ©McGill University
The Next Step
Complete the analysisLook at the linkagesAlternative value propositions scenarios