Mc 110203982

download Mc 110203982

of 12

Transcript of Mc 110203982

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    1/12

    RESEARCH METHODS (STA630) SPRING 2013

    ASSIGNMENT NO. 2

    DUE DATE: 25TH JUNE, 2013

    MARKS: 30SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: Make sure to upload the solution by using the

    given format for answering questions 1, 2, & 3. Use separate heading

    for attempting question no. 4.

    Given below is the literature review on the concept Job burnout:

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    Job Burnout concept emerged in 1970s in the field of organizational

    behavior and soon it has inspired researchers to study it to develop

    better understanding of the concept. The literature reveals that

    researchers not only explored the causes of job burnout and its impact& consequences at individual as well as organizational level, but also

    they have come with some remedial measures to combat it.

    In simple words job burnout describes the personal agony of job stress

    (Schaufeli, Leiter, & Maslach, 2009). Burnout in literal meaning defined

    as physical or emotional exhaustion caused due to long term stress.

    Researchers have tried to define burnout in different ways and gave

    different explanations. Two important definitions are cited in in the

    literature. One is presented by Nahavandi and Malekzadeh (1999)

    while second is given by Maslach (1986).Nahavandi and Malekzadeh defined job burnout as feeling of

    exhaustion and a sense of powerlessness that leads to apathy and

    psychological withdrawal (p. 536). Whereas, according to Maslach,

    job burnout is a condition of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization

    and reduced self- efficacy (p. 1).

    Both definitions vary from each other in terms of scope and precision,

    in spite of the fact, both contributed a lot in developing an

    understanding of the concept. Nahavandi and Malekzadehs definition

    is precise but refers to pure psychological domain only. The definitionlacked a common and precise measure of burnout. Whereas, Maslachs

    definition is widely accepted and referred to multiple domains that will

    be elaborated later.

    Maslach explained his definition and said that emotional exhaustion is

    the emotional state of the individuals characterized by loss of feelings

    towards work, lack of energy, and increased physical/mental illness

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    2/12

    (Leiter & Maslach, 1988). Individuals who are emotional exhausted will

    experience anxiety, fatigue and psychological diseases which will

    decrease productivity in long run. Depersonalization or

    dehumanization is marked by the treatment of others as objects rather

    than people. Workers may display an attitude to avoid work, loss ofcare/attention, and cynical attitude towards others (Maslach & Pines,

    1977). Empirical evidence shows that depersonalization has abnormal

    effects, for example; increase in turnover, absenteeism, reduced

    productivity, which implies significant cost for both organizations and

    individuals (Jackson & Maslach, 1982). Whereas; reduced self-efficacy

    consists of feelings when an individual starts thinking that he is not

    good at work, less effective, and has also a weakened sense of

    accomplishment (Maslach et al., 1996). It results in a loss of will in

    which motivation is damaged, resulting in an increased inability tomobilize interests and capabilities. So, if employees have a feeling

    that they have nothing more to give, it would create sense of

    demotivation among them.

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    3/12

    Activity Required:

    After reading the given

    literature review

    carefully; you are

    required to answerfollowing questions:

    Sr.#

    Questions Marks

    1 From the given

    literature review;

    select best definition

    and then provide an

    operational definition

    of Job burnout by

    identifying (at least 3)dimensions.

    2 State (at least 3)

    elements of each

    defined dimension.

    9

    (1 mark for each

    element)

    3 Develop (at least 1)

    question statement on

    any defined element

    by using Likert scale.

    6

    (2 marks for each

    question)

    4 Develop a causalhypothesis showing a

    cause and effect

    relation by using any

    of the defined

    dimensions with its

    consequences.

    6

    Total=30

    1 From the given literature review; select best definition and then

    provide an operational definition of Job burnout by identifying (at least3) dimensions.

    Answer = the three dimension are

    1 = EMOTIONAL EXASUATION

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    4/12

    A = lose of feelings

    B = lack of power and less energy

    C= mental illness and physical illness

    2= DEPERSONALIZATION

    A= attitude to avoid the work / always to avoid the work to do/

    negligences of the workers

    B= lose of care tension

    C= bad attitude towards others / behavior towards the others

    people

    3= REDUCED SELF EFFICNCY

    A= when individual starts thinking that he is not good

    B = less effective

    C = sense of accomplishment.

    State (at least 3) elements of each

    defined dimension.

    9

    (1 mark for each element)

    Strongly

    Agree (5)

    gree

    (4)

    Neutral

    (3)

    Disagree

    (2)

    StronglyDisagree

    (1)

    Dimension 1: Emotional exhaustion

    Element 1: Loss of feelings

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    5/12

    Element 2: Lack of energy

    Element 3: Physical/mental illness

    Question statement:

    Physical or emotional

    exhaustion caused

    due to long term

    stress?

    Strongly

    Agree

    Dimension 2:

    Element 1: Attitude to avoid work

    Element 2: Loss of care attention

    Element 3: Attitude towards others

    Question statement:

    Depersonalization ordehumanization is

    marked by the

    treatment of others as

    objects rather than

    people? Neutral

    Dimension 3: Reduced self efficacy

    Element 1: When individual starts thinking that he is not good

    Element 2: Less effective

    Element 3: Sense of accomplishment

    Question statement:

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    6/12

    Bandura identifies four factors affecting self-efficacy.

    1. Experience, or "Enactive Attainment"

    as we know that the experience is an essential factor determining a

    person's self-efficacy. Success raises self-efficacy, while failure

    lowers it.

    " Children cannot be made fool by faulty praise. It is chance we can

    make them fool by artificial things (Erik Erikson)

    2. Modeling, or "Vicarious Experience"

    Modeling is experienced as, we means if anyone can do it then I can

    also do it as well as he is. When we see something in success then our

    efficiency increased to get success where we see people failing, our

    self-efficacy decreases. This process is most effectual when we see

    ourselves as similar to the model

    3. Social Persuasion

    Social persuasion generally we means that we are directly impressed

    by the people who are advised us to do something or not to do it.

    Discouragement is generally more effective at decreasing a person's

    self-efficacy than encouragement is at increasing it.

    4. Physiological Factors

    In stressful situations, people commonly feel fear horror pains

    fatigues, shocks aches and pains, nausea, etc. Perceptions of these

    responses in one can markedly alter self-efficacy. Getting 'butterflies

    in the stomach' before public speaking will be interpreted by someone

    with low self-efficacy as a sign of inability, thus decreasing self-

    efficacy further, where high self-efficacy would lead to interpreting

    Reduced self-efficacy

    consists of feelings

    when an individual

    starts thinking?

    ans

    gree

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    7/12

    such physiological signs as normal and unrelated to ability. It is one's

    belief in the implications of physiological response that alters self-

    efficacy, rather than the physiological response itself.

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    8/12

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    9/12

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    10/12

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    11/12

  • 7/28/2019 Mc 110203982

    12/12