May 29-30 2008 Micro CHP Workshop Paris Integration of micro CHP units Dr. Jacques Deuse Technical...
-
Upload
jamison-finkle -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of May 29-30 2008 Micro CHP Workshop Paris Integration of micro CHP units Dr. Jacques Deuse Technical...
May 29-30 2008Micro CHP WorkshopParis
Integration of micro CHP units Dr. Jacques Deuse
Technical Director of EU-DEEP Project
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 2
29-30 May 2008
Presentation outline
● The EU-DEEP Project
● Energy context, from “vertical integration” to open market
● Subset of questions from the EU-DEEP Project
● Distribution network design criteria
● The updated “fit & forget” principle
● Regulation of distribution network
● “Flexible” micro CHP
● Losses
● Conclusions
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 3
29-30 May 2008
The EU-DEEP Project
A demand-pull approach● Selection of the best market segments● Choice of the best suited technology● Integration into the system
● Solutions for Technical questions● Then Market & Regulatory aspects
● Integration into the market● Potential role of Information & Computer Technology● Market access via “Local Trading Strategy”
● Integration of DER & LTS solutions● Coordinating DER controller and LTS operation● 5 one year test campaigns for
-2 site tests-and 3 aggregation experiments
● Economical optimisation via business models
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 4
29-30 May 2008
Context, yesterday electricity market
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
Load
UHV
HV
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
Load
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
Load
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
Load
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
Load
UHV
HV
µCHP, PV
Small CHPRES on shore
Centralised versus decentralised
● Integration of● Efficiency advantages● Gen investments
-Difference is only meaningful
● Reduction in-Total CAPEX-OPEX-Etc.
● Seldom used● Primary energy● Efficiency● Cogeneration● Planning methodology
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 5
29-30 May 2008
Context, today electricity market
UHV Transmission
HV Transmission
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
µCHP, PV
Small CHPRES on shore
RES off shore
CCGT & CHP
Load
UHV Transmission
HV Transmission
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
µCHP, PV
RES on shore
RES off shore
CCGT & CHP
Load
UHV Transmission
HV Transmission
MV Distribution
LV Distribution
Load
µ
RES off shore
CCGT & CHP
Load
● Electricity from gas● Mini and µgenerators
now industrialised● Mass production
● Costs reductions● Higher reliability
● EU-DEEP: 10 MW● Sources of value
● Selling kWh● DER as “network
replacement”● Supply of services● DER and security● Externalities● Incentives
● Also valid for RES
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 6
29-30 May 2008
Example for Micro – CHP
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
€ / kW
c€ /
kWh
12% 8% 4% 0% 8% NM
kWh
UoS
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 7
29-30 May 2008
EU-DEEP questions
Does DER integration raise
technical questions? What is the maximum hosting
capacity of the networks?
What are the best
segments?
How to optimize this energy
value for the system and the
client?
Do DER present a real value for the network? How to make it explicit and how rules must be
changed leading to
transparency?
Can DER present
additional value by providing
complementary resources?
Under which conditions?
TechnicalIssues Additional
servicesNetwork
ValueEnergyValue
Market and Regulation issues
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 8
29-30 May 2008
Coincidence factor
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Number of customers
Network design criteria
● DER network integration don’t raise major technical issues when some rules are respected● Basic criterion: “hosting capacity” linked to network design● “Similar” peak for load (ADMD) and generation
-Micro-CHP of 1 kW for ADMD of about 1.5 kW-PV of about 5 kWp (up to 10 kWp) for ADMD of about 1.5 kW
● Importance of the relationship between generation and load “functions”● “Similar” geographical distribution for load and generation
-“Symmetry” between feeders-Important for active management of voltage
● Deeply related to-Design criteria-and their update
● Update is different from urban to rural networks● Semi-urban networks present margins ● Urban networks: overload margins ● Rural system: limited voltage margins, should be updated
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 9
29-30 May 2008
Design, generation & load diversity
● PV in California● Peak generation during hot weather● Peak consumption due to HVAC at about 3 pm● Adjusted PV orientation for synchronous peak generation ● High value as network replacement & as loss reduction● Justifying “some” net metering
● Still, pending questions about design (kWpeak)
● PV in northern Europe● No or few HVAC● Peak generation takes place during off-peak conditions● Few or no generation during peak period● Limited or no value as network replacement or losses reduction
● Important pending questions about design (kWpeak)
● Micro CHP● Partly symmetric role than PV in hot regions● More complex for evaluating losses reduction
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 10
29-30 May 2008
MV & LV “flexible” design N3
N4 N5N6
N7 N8N9
N10 N11N12
N13
N4a N5a N7a N8a N10a N11a N13a
DER6 DER9 DER12
N4b N4c N5b N5c N7b N7c N8b N8c N10b N10c N11b N11c N13b N13c
N14 N15N16
N17 N18N19
N20 N21N22
N23
N14a N15a N17a N18a N20a N21a N23a
DER16 DER19 DER22
N14b N14c N15b N15c N17b N17c N18b N18c N20b N20c N21b N21c N23b N23c
N1 N2N27
N3
N4 N5N6
N7 N8N9
N10 N11N12
N13
N4a N5a N7a N8a N10a N11a N13a
DER6 DER9 DER12
N4b N4c N5b N5c N7b N7c N8b N8c N10b N10c N11b N11c N13b N13c
N14 N15N16
N17 N18N19
N20 N21N22
N23
N14a N15a N17a N18a N20a N21a N23a
DER16 DER19 DER22
N14b N14c N15b N15c N17b N17c N18b N18c N20b N20c N21b N21c N23b N23c
N1 N2N27
HV & MV profiles
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1
1.02
1.04
1.06
1.08
N1
N2
N27 N
3
N4
N5
N6
N7
N8
N9
N10
N11
N12
N13
N14
N15
N16
N17
N18
N19
N20
N21
N22
N23
Vo
lta
ge
(pu
)
No DER 100% LV DER & 1 MVA DER22
Low voltage profiles
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
Vo
ltag
e (p
u)
Feeder 1 Feeder 2
● Rural network● Dissymmetry
between feeders● HV – MV voltage
profiles● LV profiles
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 11
29-30 May 2008
Updated “fit & forget” principle
● Distribution substation is able to operate at PN importing or exporting
● No voltage control problems with full “asymmetry”● Operation at nominal medium voltage● Distribution transformers must be operated at nominal
transformer ratio● In low load density region, bigger cross-section cables could
be required● Impact on cost of system, but limited impact for replacement
or for new installation (installation costs dominate)● In existing systems, the updated operating point could
possibly lead to higher losses, as mean operational voltage could be reduced
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 12
29-30 May 2008
Regulation of Distribution Networks
● The value DER brings to the network must be made explicit ● Generation and load functions (and their interactions) are
playing the first critical role● Use of System charges and incentives cannot be mixed● Generation and load must be dealt with separately● A “marginal” allocation principle is used, based on a “fair
appraisal” of all costs● Network regulation should be implemented using “norm
models”● Interval metering is necessary, but is not sufficient● The proposed Use of System charges scheme is “efficient”
per se● In the long run, it should reduce the cost of system
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 13
29-30 May 2008
Flexible Stirling micro CHP
Creating value means● “Integration” into the system● Hence decoupling electricity and heat generations for
● Better price for electricity
● Better CO2 performances
● This supposes● An optimised design of µCHP & its storage● Adaptation to the hosting Central Heating installation● And in depth evaluation of the overall house heat balance
● Status of losses● From conversion machine● From heat storage
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 14
29-30 May 2008
Efficiency of rotating machines [%]
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
kW
%
SOLO generator
Sunpower generator
Micro CHP & losses
20 %
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 17
29-30 May 2008
Conclusions
● EU-DEEP Project set up a new, “efficient”, regulatory framework that could be favourable for micro CHP
● But “flexible” micro CHP is required● This means additional investments in heat storage● The electrical output must be adjusted considering network
design criteria ● Efficiency of conversion to electricity is less important than
the global efficiency● The constraints due to central heating installation must be
carefully evaluated● The status of losses (conversion & storage) requires
attention
Micro CHP Workshop, May 29 – 30 2008, slide 18
29-30 May 2008
Thank you for your attention
The European Commission funds this work as part of the EU-DEEP Project from the Sixth Framework Programme for Research and
Technological Development
Announcement
3rd International Conference on
Integration of Renewable and Distributed Energy Resources December 10-12th 2008 in Nice