May 2005 EP Show The EP Show COMPANION and CARE-HF Eric Prystowsky MD Director, Clinical...

30
May 2005 EP Show The EP Show COMPANION and CARE-HF Eric Prystowsky MD Director, Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory St Vincent Hospital Indianapolis, IN Hugh Calkins MD Director, Electrophysiology Lab Johns Hopkins University Medical Center Baltimore, MD John Cleland MD Professor of Cardiology Hull University Kingston upon Hull, UK

Transcript of May 2005 EP Show The EP Show COMPANION and CARE-HF Eric Prystowsky MD Director, Clinical...

May 2005

EP Show

The EP ShowCOMPANION and CARE-HF

Eric Prystowsky MDDirector, Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory St Vincent HospitalIndianapolis, IN

Hugh Calkins MDDirector, Electrophysiology LabJohns Hopkins University Medical CenterBaltimore, MD

John Cleland MDProfessor of CardiologyHull University Kingston upon Hull, UK

May 2005

EP Show

Use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in

COMPANION and CARE-HF

May 2005

EP Show

Brief history

• Large group of patients in need of ICDs for primary prevention

• New era of biventricular pacing to improve HF symptoms

• COMPANION and CARE-HF

May 2005

EP Show

Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in

Heart Failure

COMPANION

May 2005

EP Show

COMPANION

Design

• Parallel, randomized clinical trial in 1600 patients with moderate or severe heart failure with QRS >120 ms and PR interval >150 ms (Bristow MR et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2140-2150)

• Patients randomized in a 1:2:2 fashion to optimal medical therapy; optimal drug therapy plus CRT; or optimal drug therapy plus CRT with an ICD (CRT-D)

May 2005

EP Show

Results

Primary end point

• Combination of all-cause death and all-cause hospitalizations reduced 19% in the CRT study arm and 20% in the CRT-D study arm

• Death from or hospitalization for HF reduced 34% in CRT group and 40% in CRT-D group

May 2005

EP Show

Results

Secondary end point

• CRT alone associated with a nonsignificant trend toward a 24% reduction in all-cause mortality, a secondary end point of the study

• CRT with a defibrillator reduced all-cause mortality 36%, a highly significant result

May 2005

EP Show

Significant reductions

"This study showed in a large population of patients that resynchronization therapy improves survival and reduces hospitalization."

• Survival benefit limited to those with CRT and ICD

Calkins

May 2005

EP Show

CRT challenges

Implanting the coronary sinus lead

• Difficulty involves not getting the lead in, but getting it in the right place

• To achieve effective resynchronization, the lead needs to be implanted in a lateral branch of the coronary sinus

• Requires experienced implanter

May 2005

EP Show

Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure

CARE-HF

May 2005

EP Show

CARE-HF

Rationale

• Cardiac dyssynchrony a problem in a large number of patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

• Previous studies have suggested that CRT can improve symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity

• No conclusive evidence of an effect on hospitalizations or mortality

May 2005

EP Show

CARE-HF

Design

• Randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded-end-point study

• Randomized patients to continue with medical therapy or to receive CRT

• Included 813 patients with NYHA class 3-4 HF despite standard drug therapy, an LVEF <35%, and QRS duration of at least 120 ms

May 2005

EP Show

CARE-HF

• Patients with a QRS duration <150 ms were required to have echocardiographic confirmation of ventricular dyssynchrony

• Primary end point was all-cause mortality/unplanned hospitalization for CV event

May 2005

EP Show

Strengths of CARE-HF

Study details

• Large control group

• Implant success rate 96%

• Long-term follow-up, with an average of 2.5 years

• Average age of patient 67 years

• Only 40% of patients taking >80 mg furosemide (most common dose was 40 mg daily)

May 2005

EP Show

Cleland JGF et al. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1539-1549

Primary and secondary outcomes in CARE-HF

Outcomes Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p

All-cause mortality/unplanned hospitalization for CV event 0.63

(0.51-0.77)<0.0001

All-cause mortality 0.64(0.48-0.85)

0.0019

All-cause mortality/HF hospitalization

0.54(0.43-0.68)

<0.0001

May 2005

EP Show

Other improvements

• CRT group also benefited significantly with improved LVEF, NYHA class, end-systolic volume, mitral-valve function, blood pressure, and quality-of-life indices

• Dramatic improvements at 18 months in levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)

May 2005

EP Show

Problems encountered

Lead problems

• 27 lead-related problems, such as fracture or displacement, in the 409 patients randomized to CRT

• Number of cases of coronary sinus dissection, none of which caused death

• One procedure-related death in each group

May 2005

EP Show

Possible remission

"I think we see a substantial proportion of patients who become asymptomatic and whose cardiac function is normalized by this therapy."

• Possibility of HF "remission"

Cleland

May 2005

EP Show

What therapy?

No question to the value of CRT, but candidates for CRT are also candidates for ICD therapy

The question then becomes, which treatment do they receive?

May 2005

EP Show

Treating patients

"It's a fairly easy decision."

• Real difference comes down to cost, but the added protection of the ICD warrants the use of CRT with a defibrillator

Calkins

May 2005

EP Show

Other issues

Morbidity

There is the possibility of inappropriate shocks from the ICD in healthy patients who might not stand to benefit from its addition

In studies using older devices, the morbidity from the defibrillator was unacceptable

May 2005

EP Show

If money were not an issue . . .

• CRT with newer defibrillators does provide an additional benefit

• But cost in the UK remains an issue, and I would continue to be selective about which patients received CRT with defibrillator backup

Cleland

May 2005

EP Show

Patient selection

Have you learned anything from the studies that would help you select patients for a CRT-D implant?

- Prystowsky

The brief answer to that is not yet.

- Cleland

May 2005

EP Show

Inappropriate shocks

Not a case of inappropriate shocks but inappropriate programmers

• EPs programming devices that deliver inappropriate shocks more than 5% of the time need to go back to school

Prystowsky

May 2005

EP Show

Inappropriate shocks

"It irks me at times because people throw that up as a reason not to get a defibrillator, but I say get a better implanter, get a smarter doctor."

- Prystowsky

"But not everybody can come to your center and benefit from your expertise."

- Cleland

May 2005

EP Show

Looking to the future

• Interesting issue as not everybody with a wide QRS benefits, and even some with a narrow QRS benefit from CRT

• Pathophysiology suggests applying therapy earlier, to patients in NYHA class 2, to prevent progression of HF

May 2005

EP Show

Looking to the future

"The fact that CARE-HF was so positive in a rather milder population than COMPANION supports the drift to using these devices at an earlier stage."

Cleland

May 2005

EP Show

Patient selection

• Some patients have such dramatic improvements with CRT that they may no longer be candidates for an ICD

• Need more research on the benefit of the defibrillator in CRT-D therapy

May 2005

EP Show

Conclusions

Summary

Patient who meets criteria for resynchronization should be treated accordingly

• Defibrillator component remains to be debated, mainly due to the issue of economics

May 2005

EP Show

Conclusions

CARE-HF showed major reductions in mortality with pacing alone

"The world is better off for the fact that we've had these two studies."

- Prystowsky