Maximizing the Impact of Your Projects
-
Upload
brandon-olson -
Category
Business
-
view
148 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Maximizing the Impact of Your Projects
MAXIMIZING THE IMPACT OF YOUR
PROJECTSProject Management Workshop
Brandon Olson, PhD
Purpose
•Define projects and project management
•Determine business value of projects
•Conceptualize projects as part of a portfolio
•Evaluate the portfolio approach to projects
•Develop strategies to measure and assess project value
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
Definitions of Project Management
•"...a complex, non-routine, one-time effort limited by time, budget, resources, and performance specifications designed to meet customer needs(Gray & Larson, 2008)
•"...a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result.“ (PMI, 2008)
UniqueTemporary
One-Time
Project Characteristics
Kerzner, 2009
PROJECT
Specific Objective withDefined Specifications
Defined Startand End Dates
Funding Limitations
Consume Human andNonhuman Resources
Multiple Disciplines
Purpose of Project Management
Project ManagementA B
Change
Project Sources
Increase Revenue(expand services)
Reduce Expenses
Directive
New product/servicesMarket ExpansionIncreased Scalability
Process ImprovementDecision Making
Government ComplianceSelf-ImposedCompetitive Standards
Why Projects?
Operational Islands
Project Management
Scope
TimeCost
ProjectManager
Project Success Rates
Successful Challenged Failed0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
199419961998200420092011
Gale, S. (2011). Failure rates finally drop. PM Network, 25(8), 10-11.
Sources of Project Failures
1. Project Champion
2. Process Shortcuts
3. Expectations Management
4. Variable Lock-In
5. Estimating Techniques
6. Optimism
7. Resource Assumptions
8. People Management
9. Adapting to Change
10.Insufficient Resources
Adapted from Whitten & Bentley, 2007
Project Success?
•How do you define project success?
Example – New Project
•Purpose: Deploy a new information system to manage product inventory
•Scope:•Track product inventory as it is used•Real-time inventory reporting•“Wouldn’t it be cool if we could also keep track of the different types of inventory we used”
•Budget:•1 pen/pencil, 1 sheet of paper, 1 developer
•Schedule:•45 seconds
Project Charter
•Purpose: Deploy a new information system to manage product inventory
•Goal: Reduce production time by 25%
Business Value
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
Project Value
Business Value?
•What organizational benefits are created and realized from the project?
•Operational•New or improved functionality
•Strategic•Quantifiable organizational-level benefits
Evaluating Business Value
•Return on Investment (ROI)
•Net Present Value
•Payback Analysis
Return on InvestmentImplementation Costs
Programmer $87,000.00 Return on Investment 10 yrsDatabase Specialist $21,000.00 Implementation Costs $219,000.00
System Architect $28,000.00 Operating Costs (10yrs) $520,000.00
Database Server $15,000.00 Total Costs $739,000.00Application Server $12,000.00Desktop Devices $25,000.00 Benefits (10 yrs) $1,955,500.00Project Management $31,000.00
$219,000.00Operating Costs ROI: (Total Benefits - Total Costs)
Technical Support $25,000.00 Total CostsProgrammer $16,500.00Client Licenses $6,000.00 ROI: 164.61%Training $4,500.00
$52,000.00
Annual BenefitsIncreased capacity $56,400.00Increased satisfaction $63,550.00Reduced costs $75,600.00
$195,550.00
Net Present ValueYear 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Implementation -$219,000.00
Operations -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00
Discout Factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567
Present Value -$219,000.00 -$46,428.57 -$41,454.08 -$37,012.57 -$33,046.94 -$29,506.20
5 Year Costs -$406,448.36
Annual Benefits $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00
Discout Factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567
Present Value $195,550.00 $174,598.21 $155,891.26 $139,188.63 $124,275.56 $110,960.32
5 Year Benefits $900,463.99
Net Present Value $494,015.62
PVn = 1/(1+i)n
PVn = 1/(1+.12)n 1 0.892857143 0.79719388 0.71178025 0.63551808 0.56742686
Payback AnalysisYear 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Implementation -$219,000.00Operations -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00 -$52,000.00Discout Factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567Present Value -$219,000.00 -$46,428.57 -$41,454.08 -$37,012.57 -$33,046.94 -$29,506.20Cumuliative Costs -$219,000.00 -$265,428.57 -$306,882.65 -$343,895.23 -$376,942.17 -$406,448.36
Annual Benefits $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00 $195,550.00Discout Factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567Present Value $195,550.00 $174,598.21 $155,891.26 $139,188.63 $124,275.56 $110,960.32Cumulative Benefits $195,550.00 $370,148.21 $526,039.48 $665,228.10 $789,503.66 $900,463.99
0 1 2 3 4 5Cumulative Profit -$23,450.00 $104,719.64 $219,156.82 $321,332.88 $412,561.50 $494,015.62
Net Present ValuePVn = 1/(1+.12)n 1 0.892857143 0.797193878 0.711780248 0.635518078 0.567426856
rise/run $103,493.12m = $103,493.12b = -23,450.00Y = 0
Y = mX + bx 0.23years
Evaluating Business Value
•Alignment with Business Strategy
Objective
Objective
Objective
Objective
Business Value
Benefits Alignment Value
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
ProjectV
Project Selection:Resource Limitations
ProjectW
ProjectN
ProjectR Project
S
ProjectY
Productivity
TimeFunds
Personnel
Project Selection:Common Practices•Political Influence
•Squeaky Wheel
•FIFO
•LIFO
•Financial Attributes(ROI/NPV/Payback)
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
Challenging Project Environment
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PMPM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
Portfolio ApproachProject Portfolio
Operational Scope Strategic Scope
Governance Governance
Schedule Business Value
Budget Portfolio / Project Risk
Functionality Schedule & Budget
Project Risk Functionality
Distributed Management Centralized Management
Project Portfolio Management
•Goal:•Determine and deliver the mix of potential projects that will result in the best utilization of human and cash resources and maximize long-range growth and return on investment for the firm.
Levine, 2005
AB
Y
S
AH
JW
B
Align = 9
Value = 8
Align = 3
Value = 10
Project B
Project Governance
Project I
Project M
Project R
Project X
Project T
Project L
Project Q
Project P
Project Y
Project D
Project A
Project N
Project J
PMO
Project Portfolio Governance
Executive ManagementPortfolio
Project Y
Program
Project R
Project X
Project C
Project G
Portfolio
Program
Project A
Project Q
Project H
Project J
Program
Project K
Project B
Project S
2 Phases of PPMPortfolio Selection
• Propose Projects• Align Projects• Evaluate Projects• Identify Risks/Value• Rank Projects• Select Projects
ProjectPipeline
Portfolio Maintenance
• Project Objectives• Portfolio Objectives• Forecast Impacts• Reevaluate Projects
• Value• Performance
• Determine Funding• Cancel• Continue
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
PPM Process
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Strategic Alignment
Organization Strategy and Objectives
Operations Planning Strategic Planning
Initiatives
Project Portfolio
Operational Resources
PMI, 2008b
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
What is Value?
•Return on Investment (ROI)
Estimated Lifetime Benefits – Estimated Lifetime Costs
Estimated Lifetime Costs
Example: $310,000 - $160,000
$160,000= 0.94 = 94%
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Project Selection18%
46%
25%
11%
Infor-ma-tionalInfra-structure
Common IT Portfolio
CostAgilityMIT Sloan Center, 2007
InnovationIntegration
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Risk EvaluationPrimar
y Fundin
g
Selective
Funding
Selective
Funding
Not Funded
RISK
VA
LU
E
Financial Measure
RiskMeasure
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Quasi-Quantitative Risk Evaluation
Scale Value Probability Value Schedule Cost
Very
High
1.0 90% - 100% > 10% > 10% > 10%
High 0.7 70% - 90% 5% - 10% 5% - 10% 5% - 10%
Medium 0.5 50% - 70% 2% - 5% 2% - 5% 2% - 5%
Low 0.3 30% - 50% 1% - 2% 1% - 2% 1% - 2%
Very
Low
0.1 10% - 30% 0% - 1% 0% - 1% 0% - 1% Risk
Levels
Very Low Low Medium High Very High
Very Low .01 .03 .05 .07 .10
Low .03 .09 .15 .21 .30
Medium .05 .15 .25 .35 .50
High .07 .21 .35 .49 .70
Very High .10 .30 .50 .70 1.00
Probability
Risk
Impact Score =Average (Value, Schedule, Cost)
Adapted from Brewer & Dittman, 2010 and Lovelady &Anderson, 2006
Probability Score = Probability
Risk Score = Impact X Probability
or color
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Project Selection
Primary
Funding
Selective
Funding
Selective
Funding
Not Funded
RISK
VA
LU
E
18%
46%
25%
11%
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Project Evaluation•Alignment
•Value
•Distribution
•Risk Assessment
•Balance Resources ($ and people)
•Intangible Benefits
Consistency
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Monitor Portfolio
Project
Project
Project
Project
Program
Program
Distribution Risk
Alignment Value
Align Value Distribute Risk Select Monitor
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
Steps to PPM
Define Portfolio
Gather Projects
Begin Weeding
Begin Evaluati
ng
The PPM Starter Kit, ganntthead.com
Tips for PPM
1. Start at the Top
2. Avoid the Big Bang
3. Develop a Governance Process
4. Use a Proven PPM Tool
5. Forgive Human Errors but not Process Errors
6. Use the Tool in your
Operations Reviews
7. Use Executive Dashboards
8. Be Open to Project Failures
9. Anticipate Business Opportunities & Constraints
10.Remember Who the Boss is ganntthead.com
Key Drivers of PPM
•78% - Senior Management Receptivity
•66% - Competent Portfolio Governance
•62% - Standardized Metrics and Criteria
•59% - Consistency & Logic of Objectives
•58% - Mature Project Management Office
PM Network Survey, 2012
Formalized PM & PPM Practices
• Organizations with stable PPM practices see 64% of projects meet targeted ROI (17% more than highly variable PPM practices)
• Formalization at both the project and portfolio levels results in higher performance than formalization at just one level
• Formalization provides transparency that leads to improved allocation of resources and an overall cooperation between projects
PM Network Survey, 2012 & Teller, Unger, Kock & Gemunden, 2012
64%
Why PPM?
Improved Prod. Dev. Costs
Improved ROI
Revenue Growth
Cost Reduction
Customer Satisfaction
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
40%
45%
58%
59%
73%
PM Network Survey, 2012
Agenda
•Project Management Overview
•Introduction to Business Value
•Selecting Projects
•Portfolio Approach
•PPM Process
•Migrating to PPM
•Application to the PM
What does this mean to me?
PPM
MyProject
Business Strategies
What does this mean to me?
PPM
MyProject
ProjectJ
ProjectC
ProjectQ
ProjectX
ProjectP
ProjectN
MyProject
ProjectG
Value
Functionality BudgetSchedule
Business Strategies
Ensuring Value
•Develop a Project Value Chain(Think Critical Path)
•Include Value in Risk Management Strategy•Evaluate Value Performance Frequently•Target Metric for Change Management
Suggested Readings
July, 2012Volume 30
Issue 5
References• Brewer, J. L., & Dittman, K. C. (2010). Methods of IT project management. Boston, MA: Prentice
Hall.
• Gale, S. (2011). Failure rates finally drop. PM Network, 25(8), 10-11.
• Gray, C.F., & Larson, E.W. (2008). Project management: The managerial process (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
• Lovelady, R., & Anderson, A. (2006). Psst: Want to take a risk? In G. Richardson & C. Butler (Eds.), Readings in information technology project management (pp. 166-171). Boston, MA: Thomson/Course Technology.
• Pearlson, K.E. & Saunders, C.S. (2010). Managing and using information systems: A strategic approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
• Project Management Institute (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newtown Square: PA: Author.
• Project Management Institute (2012). The power of portfolio management. PM Network, 26(6), 14-15.
• Teller, J., Unger, B.N., Kock, A., & Gemunden, H.G. (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity. The International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 596-607. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.020.
• Whitten, J.L., & Bentley, L.D. (2007). Systems analysis and design methods (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGrawHill /Irwin.
Posted Presentations
•My Presentations•http://faculty.css.edu/bolson1/presentations.html
•Topic 1: The Value of Project Management•http://faculty.css.edu/bolson1/presentations/ValueofPM.pdf
•Topic 2: 10 Ways to Increase Your Project’s Success•http://faculty.css.edu/bolson1/presentations/ProjectSuccess.pdf•http://faculty.css.edu/bolson1/presentations/ProjectSuccess2.pdf
•Topic 3: Maximizing the Impact of Your Projects•http://faculty.css.edu/bolson1/presentations/ProjectImpact.pdf