MAXIMIZING PATIENT CARE WITH EFFICIENT VITAL SIGNS … · 2019-04-05 · 10 Triage 09 Traditional...
Transcript of MAXIMIZING PATIENT CARE WITH EFFICIENT VITAL SIGNS … · 2019-04-05 · 10 Triage 09 Traditional...
10 Triage
09 Traditional Vitals
MAXIMIZING PATIENT CARE WITH EFFICIENT VITAL SIGNS ACQUISITION
DEFINE Problem Statement: Vital signs are the very beginning of every patient-caregiver interaction. Typical processes include multiple stations to capture base vital signs (height, weight, pulse, temperature and blood pressure); some stations are semi-public spaces. While the vital signs process has not changed significantly in 30 years, the integration of electronic medical records (EMR), new technologies and automated devices could have a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the process.
Project Aim: Midmark partnered with a research firm to examine potential workflow efficiencies during the acquisition of vital signs, as well as the interaction between patients and caregivers, in an effort to identify near- and long-term implications for efficiency.
Project Focus: The study included non-acute care facilities ranging from independent practices to integrated delivery networks (IDNs), sites with paper-based medical records, and sites transitioning to EMR or fully integrated with EMR. The facilities also included automated and manual acquisition of vital signs.
OBSERVATIONS Care interaction was observed from the time the patient was called from the waiting room, through vital signs acquisition, to the time the patient was ready to see the physician. The average time was 5 minutes, 7 seconds.
Time Consistency Across Sites
Average total visit time varied between 3:17 and 9:02. Most of the difference is attributed to Reason for Visit (RFV).
• EMR woes: EMR takes longer due to more extensive data entry (average difference of 1:47 minutes)
• Ergonomics for both patient and caregiver have a lot of room for improvement (access to patient and placement of equipment)
• Data transfer is not streamlined: all offices except one used paper to record vital signs even when using EMR, transferring from different sources and locations
• Accuracy: proper blood pressure positioning and procedures were rarely followed and room setup does not help facilitate it
Conveyance 14%
RFV 22%
Vital Signs 47%
Misc. 17%
1
0:38
1:24
2:10
2:56
3:42
4:28
5:14
6:00
6:46
7:32
8:18
9:05
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Aver
age
Tota
l Vis
it Ti
me
Total Visit Time Vital Signs Tests RFV Time
MEASURE/DATA Data Collected:
• Workflow and sequence to acquire base vital signs including height, weight, pulse, temperature and blood pressure
• Time required to acquire base vital signs including height, weight, pulse, temperature and blood pressure
• Location of vital signs acquisition
667 patient interactions observed
12 non-acute care facilities
277 total hours of observation
68 medical assistants observed
MKT00280 © 2019 Midmark Corporation, Miamisburg, Ohio USA
Results of the Midmark study on vital signs acquisition indicated that taking a number of steps, including moving vital signs into the exam room and implementing automated vital signs, could reduce conveyance and acquisition time by as much as 36 percent. The Midmark Clinical Solutions vital signs workflow models developed based on the research findings provide a foundation for the integration of vital signs acquisition into a modern, efficient workflow. By rethinking vital signs workflows and incorporating elements of these models into their own settings, health systems can streamline efforts without sacrificing accuracy or patient satisfaction.
IMPROVEMENTS + OUTCOMESTraditional Vital Signs Connected In-Room Vital SignsTriage Nook Basic In-Room Vital Signs
H W P T BP H W P T BP
The traditional workflow requires an average of 187 seconds from the time the patient is called through vital signs acquisition.
In Hallway or Triage In Exam Room
Total Time: 187 Seconds
Conveyance 42
Vital Signs145
H W P T BP H W P T BP
The triage nook workflow, when compared with the traditional, saves 30 seconds by implementing automated vital signs capture.
In Hallway or Triage In Exam Room
Conveyance 42
Total Time: 157 Seconds
Vital Signs 115
Time Savings 30
H W P T BP H W P T BP
The basic in-room workflow, when compared with the triage nook, saves 22 seconds in conveyance time by moving all vital signs to the exam room.
In Hallway or Triage In Exam Room
Conveyance 20
Total Time: 135 Seconds
Vital Signs 115
Time Savings52
H W P T BP H W P T BP On Exam Chair
The connected in-room workflow, when compared with the basic in-room, saves 17 seconds by taking the weight, temperature, pulse and blood pressure on the exam chair.
In Hallway or Triage In Exam Room
Conveyance 20
Total Time: 118 Seconds
Vital Signs98
Time Savings69
11 Basic In Room Vitals 12 Connected Inroom Vitals