MAXIMIZING ARPU FOR MOBILE OPERATORS Pricing strategies to
Transcript of MAXIMIZING ARPU FOR MOBILE OPERATORS Pricing strategies to
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 2
OBJECTIVES OF THIS SESSION
PRESENT 2 CONCRETE PRICING STRATEGIES,BASED ON ACTUAL CASE STUDIES, RESULTING
IN ARPU INCREASE
PRESENT 2 CONCRETE PRICING STRATEGIES,BASED ON ACTUAL CASE STUDIES, RESULTING
IN ARPU INCREASE
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 3
• Common wisdom says “that if we increase prices,we’ll increase ARPU” whereas “if we decreaseprices, the elasticity will not be enough to maintainARPU”, following the belief that:
1. The “classical” price / demand elasticity curve holds,showing a limited set of “states” for each customer
2. There is an “optimun point” that would maximizeexpenditure for each customer
3. At the current price levels, this “optimum point” is to theright of the curve, meaning that price levels would haveto be increased (!) to reach it
• Common wisdom says “that if we increase prices,we’ll increase ARPU” whereas “if we decreaseprices, the elasticity will not be enough to maintainARPU”, following the belief that:
1. The “classical” price / demand elasticity curve holds,showing a limited set of “states” for each customer
2. There is an “optimun point” that would maximizeexpenditure for each customer
3. At the current price levels, this “optimum point” is to theright of the curve, meaning that price levels would haveto be increased (!) to reach it
THE CLASSICAL PRICE / DEMAND CURVE
Currentsituation
Optimunpoint
Currentprice levels
Price perminute
Expenditure
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 4
• In practice, each customer behaves along his own“price / demand” elasticity curve:
- For certain customers, still price decreases mayresult in an increase of ARPU
- Customers require different price plans to reachtheir “optimun point”...
- ...but the existence of different price plans mightresult in a considerable ARPU DESTRUCTION ifnot correctly targeted:
� What would happen if each customer wasautomatically moved to his cheapest priceplan?
• In practice, each customer behaves along his own“price / demand” elasticity curve:
- For certain customers, still price decreases mayresult in an increase of ARPU
- Customers require different price plans to reachtheir “optimun point”...
- ...but the existence of different price plans mightresult in a considerable ARPU DESTRUCTION ifnot correctly targeted:
� What would happen if each customer wasautomatically moved to his cheapest priceplan?
DIFFERENT CUSTOMERS... DIFFERENT OPTIMUN POINTS... NEEDFOR A TARGETED APPROACH
• IF THE OBJECTIVE IS TO MAXIMIZE ARPU,“TARGETED APPROACH” IS THE KEYWORD
• DIRECT MARKETING TECHNIQUES (DATAMINING +TARGETED CAMPAIGNS) ARE THUS ESSENTIAL
• IF THE OBJECTIVE IS TO MAXIMIZE ARPU,“TARGETED APPROACH” IS THE KEYWORD
• DIRECT MARKETING TECHNIQUES (DATAMINING +TARGETED CAMPAIGNS) ARE THUS ESSENTIAL
Price perminute
Less pricesensitive
Very muchprice sensitive
A B C
ExpenditureIdeal plan from
customer AIdeal plan from
customer C
Current pricelevel (e.g. price
plan 1)
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 5
• Common wisdom says that “if we increase prices, we’llincrease ARPU” whereas if we decrease prices, theelasticity will not be enough to maintain ARPU, endorsingthe belief that:1. The “classical” price / demand elasticity curve holds,
showing a limited set of “states” for each customer2. There is an “optimun point” that would maximize
expenditure for each customer3. At the current price levels, this “optimun point” is to the
right of the curve, meaning that price levels would haveto be increased (!) to reach it
• Common wisdom says that “if we increase prices, we’llincrease ARPU” whereas if we decrease prices, theelasticity will not be enough to maintain ARPU, endorsingthe belief that:1. The “classical” price / demand elasticity curve holds,
showing a limited set of “states” for each customer2. There is an “optimun point” that would maximize
expenditure for each customer3. At the current price levels, this “optimun point” is to the
right of the curve, meaning that price levels would haveto be increased (!) to reach it
• In this situation, are there feasible alternativesto increase ARPU?
…not customer-friendly in thiscompetitive environment
• Increase pricesA
…there seems to be limitedroom for this for productsalready known (voice, SMS)
• Increase useB
…which seems to be incontradiction with the curve?
• Increase use bylowering prices
CPrice perminute
Expenditure
HOW TO INCREASE CUSTOMER ARPU WITHIN THE FRAMEWORKOF THE CLASSICAL PRICE / DEMAND CURVE?
AB
C
In the following slides we’ll see 2different approaches to realize
option C
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 6
• In practice, customers don’t have a 100% stableusage pattern, showing fluctuations over differentmonths …
• … and when they move to bundles they tend tochoose amounts exceeding their usage, notreaching the optimun price per minute in the shortterm …
• … and progressively evolving towards thisoptimum point for them
• In practice, customers don’t have a 100% stableusage pattern, showing fluctuations over differentmonths …
• … and when they move to bundles they tend tochoose amounts exceeding their usage, notreaching the optimun price per minute in the shortterm …
• … and progressively evolving towards thisoptimum point for them
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS PRICE BUNDLES
This shows a strategy whereby certain customerprofiles still show room for ARPU evolution in awin / win way:
• Operators increase ARPU• Customers enjoy a lower price per minute
This shows a strategy whereby certain customerprofiles still show room for ARPU evolution in awin / win way:
• Operators increase ARPU• Customers enjoy a lower price per minute
Price perminute
Expenditure
Current pricelevel (e.g. price
plan 1)
A
B
C
Current priceplan for thecustomer
Bundle tariff
A
BC
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 7
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS PRICE BUNDLES (Cont.)
• When customers move to bundles, they tend to choose amounts excluding their actual usage:- On average 15% - 20% higher than actual usage...- ...but 70% of customers choose bundles above their usage
< 25 < 50 < 75 < 100 < 125 < 150 < 175 < 200 < 225 < 250
<75% >125%
~50% ~25%
75% - 125%
~25%
Customers
Usage
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 8
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS PRICE BUNDLES (Cont.)
Price perminute
ARPU
Bundle 1Bundle 2
Bundle 3
TotalARPU
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3
Customers progressively increase their usage and ARPU, making a more efficient use of their bundle.
Time
Bundle (curve)
Usage bellowthe pack
Usa
ge e
xcee
ding
the
pack
Evolution of customers in bundles
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 9
• In fact, different customer profilescan be identified according to theirreaction to bundles
• These profiles are characterized bya number of variables- ARPU- ARPU stability- Payment method- Age- …
• These profiles can be identifiedthrough experience and taken intoaccount when launching targetedmigration campaigns
• In fact, different customer profilescan be identified according to theirreaction to bundles
• These profiles are characterized bya number of variables- ARPU- ARPU stability- Payment method- Age- …
• These profiles can be identifiedthrough experience and taken intoaccount when launching targetedmigration campaigns
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS PRICE BUNDLES (Cont.)
…
…
…
…
+40%
+20%
10%
-30%
0%
+30%
Avg ARPUimpact+20%
Profile B2
Profile B1
Profile A2
Profile A1
Profile A
Profile B
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 10
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS “ALL YOU CAN EAT”PRICING OPTIONS
“ALL YOU CAN EAT” OPTIONS“ALL YOU CAN EAT” OPTIONS ARPU IMPACT (ON PROMO VARIABLE)ARPU IMPACT (ON PROMO VARIABLE)
Price perminute
ARPU
1
2
1
Well targeted
Wrongly targeted
1 Before campaign
After campaign2
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 11
APARENT CONFLICT OF INTERESTAPARENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CUSTOMERS INTEREST IN THE PROPOSITIONCUSTOMERS INTEREST IN THE PROPOSITION
Ideally we would like to avoid the apparent conflict ofinterest and segment customers in order to identifythose who both:
• Are interested in the propositions• Will increase ARPU and profitability
PROFITABLEFOR THE CUSTOMER
PROFITABLEFOR THE OPERATOR
YES NO
ANALYSISDoes a customer spend
more than €5/month on on-net calls during weekends?
“Call free on-net duringweekends for €5 / month”
• Ex-post analysis reveals customers groups withpotential for stimulation
• Some behaviours seem to be universal (similardynamics have been observed across several markets)
• Customersinterested in thecampaign in orderto stop limiting theirusage (“want totalk more”)
• Customersinterested in thecampaignexpecting toreduce their overallexpenditure (“wantto spend less”)
PROMO VARIABLEUSAGE EVOLUTION
BEFORE AFTER
SEGMENT “A”:STIMULATIONPOTENTIAL
SEGMENT “B”:ALREADYSERVED
15
100
+10%
x 6-7
100 110
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS “ALL YOU CAN EAT” PRICINGPROPOSITIONS (Cont.)HOW TO MAKE CUSTOMERS SATISFIED WHILE INCREASING THEIR ARPU?
ValorisVAL-CIAL-CONFERENCES-2006-Pricing IIR Apr2006-060418-JMC Page 12
ANALYSIS OF RESULTSANALYSIS OF RESULTSFULL-LAUNCH: SELECTION
OF IDEAL TARGET,IDEAL PROPOSITION
FULL-LAUNCH: SELECTIONOF IDEAL TARGET,
IDEAL PROPOSITION
EXPECTED PROFITABILITY
EXPECTED RESPONSE RATE
NPV: - 5NPV: - 5
NPV: - 50NPV: - 50
NPV: - 15NPV: - 15
Low voiceusage inweekends
High totalusage
Low totalusageHuge voice
usage inweekends
NPV: 30NPV: 30
NPV: 10NPV: 10
Accep. Rate: 300Accep. Rate: 300
Accep. Rate: 80Accep. Rate: 80
Accep. Rate: 20Accep. Rate: 20
Accep. Rate: 400Accep. Rate: 400
Accep. Rate: 200Accep. Rate: 200
Huge on-netSMS usageduringweekends
Low on-netSMS usageduringweekends
High ARPU
Low ARPU
Accep. Rate: 300Accep. Rate: 300
Accep. Rate: 500Accep. Rate: 500
Senior
Young
INTERESTED & PROFITABLE CLUSTERS
Accep. Rate:150
Accep. Rate:150
Accep. Rate:60
Accep. Rate:60
Accep. Rate:10
Accep. Rate:10
Accep. Rate:300
Accep. Rate:300
Accep. Rate:100
Accep. Rate:100Huge on-net
SMS usageduringweekends
Low on-netSMS usageduringweekends
High ARPU
Low ARPU
Accep. Rate:50
Accep. Rate:50
Accep. Rate:200
Accep. Rate:200
Senior
YoungAcceptance
rate: 50Acceptance
rate: 50
CUSTOMERSWITH POSITIVENPV Accep. Rate:
100Accep. Rate:
100
Accep. Rate:200
Accep. Rate:200
HighARPU
Young
NPV: 10
NPV: 15
NPV: 8
TESTTEST
Not
inte
rste
d
STI
M
INF
CR
IM Notinteresting
Acceptance rate:100
Avg. NPV: - 10
Acceptance rate:100
Avg. NPV: - 10
RESULTSRESULTS
AVG:-10
AVG:100
ARPU INCREASEARPU INCREASE
SATISFIEDCUSTOMERSSATISFIED
CUSTOMERS
CUSTOMERS REACTION TOWARDS “ALL YOU CAN EAT” PRICINGPROPOSITIONS (Cont.)3 STEPS PROCESS TOWARDS ARPU INCREASE + SATISFACTION