Matthias Pohler
-
Upload
ceobroadband -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
1.059 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Matthias Pohler
“The road to a nationwide FTTH‐deployment by funding empty conduit networks”
FTTH Council Europe Conference Taking your Live to new Horizons
FIL Exhibition Centre in Lisbon24‐25 February 2010
Dr. Matthias Pohler, Tele‐Kabel‐Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Managing DirectorContact: Mobile: 0172‐3752675, Tel.: 0371‐52333‐0, Fax: 0371‐52333‐33, e‐mail: M.Pohler@tki‐chemnitz.de
1
• Motivation of funding high speed broadband networks
• Options of state aid und the mayor goal
• Two approaches of planningempty conduit networks
• Two synergy effects as an example
Agenda
2
Motivation of funding high speed broadband networks
Market failure through non economically FTTH deployments makes subventions necessary. The build of the NGA network allows the funding of empty conduit networks
Motivation ...
Investment decisions and political interaction due to investment costs
FTTH coverage of all HH(in %)
required FTTH‐Investment in € / building
0
1000
1500
500
2000
2500
3500
3000
4000
4500
5000
100
No investments
One FTTx‐Network +
Coax
Infrastructure competition FTTH/Coax
20 40 60 800
Political framework
Subventions necessary, PPP models, shared use of third party infrastructure,
No subventions necessary, investments friendly regulation, SMP regulation, regional differentiated regulation, anti‐trust law
No subventions necessary, investments friendly regulation, SMP regulation, anti‐
trust law
4
Investments for FTTH networksand their economic impact
Illustrative
Investment
per HH
> 1.000 €
Investment
per HH
< 1.000 €
DSL‐light
regionInfrastructure competition
Use of empty conduit networks
No use of empty conduit networks
Generic options to use synergies in the construction of NGA infrastructure
The questions is, where else it is economically reasonable to include existing infrastructure or empty conduit networks in the construction of NGA infrastructure
Motivation ...
Costs of acclamation
Costs of use?
Avoiding parallelinfrastructures
Use ofsubventions?
Approval of state aid?
5
Illustrative
Options of state aid and the mayor goal
7
Enabling of long term competition
Options of state aid …
The funding of empty conduits will lead to enhanced competition and continuously technology development in a long term perspective
Options of state aid award procedure
Technologically neutral call for tenders
Direct negotiationFunding of
empty conduits
Short term optimizationSecond best
short term solution
technology capability (cost/benefit)
cumulative investmentwithin a technology family
limit of the new technology
PO
technology capability (cost/benefit)
all cumulative investment
limit of the old technology
PO , PNTechnology potential
PO
PN
HSPA
LTE
HSPA
LTE
Technology outsidethe technology family
IllustrativePN
PN
Two approaches of planningempty conduit networks
Identification of deployment areas on the basis of the potential demandBroadband demand and availability
Identification of the infrastructure in the regional localitygeo‐based background maps
Identification of capacities and there technical specificationsempty conduit infrastructure
Identification of cable / fiber availability
Cable und wireless infrastructure
Fast comparison of available / planned infrastructure supply and market demand
master plan deployment scenario
The planning of empty conduit networks should be embedded into an overall market knowledge and strategic focus
Information environment of an empty conduit network planning
Planning empty conduit networks ...
9
Two approaches …
Both approches offer advantages and disadvantages. If planning capacity is available, one should include both points of view
Top‐down versus bottom‐up approach
10
• Coordinated planning of wide area networks for the connection of all municipalities
• Redundancy planning and cluster planning is possible
Advantage …
• Lack of detailed knowledge about assets, arrangements and locations of existing infrastructure
• Difficulties of involvent of all stakeholders and interests
Disadvantage ...
• Knowledge of the mayor about assets, arrangements and locations of existing infrastructure
• Detailed matching with lokal interest
Advantage …
• No inclusion of wide area networks for connecting PoPs• No synergy effects by deploying networks, connected beyond municipal borders
Disadvantage ...
10
Top‐down
Bottom‐up
The bottom‐up approach allows a more detailed planning with the inclusion of local conditions and alternative solutions
11
Example for a bottom‐up approach
Two approaches …
Backhaul Access
Alternative 1: use of an old railway‐trail(cost effective)
Alternative 2: passing homes (Increasing FTTH Coverage)
PoP / Head End
12
Example for a bottom‐up approach
Two approaches …
PoP / Head end
Alternative 1:
Alternative 2:
PoP / Head end
The bottom‐up approach allows a more detailed planning with the inclusion of local conditions and alternative solutions
13
Example for a top‐down approach
The focus on large areas will lead to new concepts of the deployment of a next generation access network for a whole region
Identification of underserved areas (< 2MBit/s)
Two approaches …
14
Example for a top‐down approach
Two approaches …
Identification of underserved areas(< 2MBit/s)
Inclusion of the existing infrastructure
The focus on large areas will lead to new concepts of the deployment of a next generation access network for a whole region
15
Example for a top‐down approach
Two approaches …
Identification of underserved areas (< 2MBit/s)
Inclusion of the existing backbone infrastructure
Planning of the empty conduit network
The focus on large areas will lead to new concepts of the deployment of a next generation access network for a whole region
16
Example for a top‐down approach
Two approaches …
Identification of underserved areas(< 2MBit/s)
Inclusion of the existing infrastructure
Planning of the empty conduit network
Closing gaps and deployment of a redundant network by using existing infrastructures
The focus on large areas will lead to new concepts of the deployment of a next generation access network for a whole region
Two synergy effects as an example
Example for cost allocation
To connect different last mile technologies of network operators by one network infrastructure allows to reduce cost in comparison to an individual deployment
Allocation of cost according to a “fraction‐key”
Two synergy effects…
18
19
The top‐down approach allows the raising of synergy effects if the planning is not restricted by municipal borders
Optional clustering of integrated networks to reduce deployment costs
Two synergy effects …
Contact:Dr. Matthias Pohler, Tele‐Kabel‐Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Germany, Managing DirectorMobile: +49172‐3752675, phone: +49371‐52333‐0, Fax: +49371‐52333‐33, mail: m.pohler@tki‐chemnitz.de
Thank you for your kind attention!