Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven, Institute for commercial and insolvency law

4
Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven, Institute for commercial and insolvency law Symposium “200 years Savigny and Thibaut. The Codification Debate Revisited” Maastricht 10 Oct. 2014

description

Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven, Institute for commercial and insolvency law Symposium “200 years Savigny and Thibaut. The Codification Debate R evisited ” Maastricht 10 Oct . 2014. 6 P erspectives. Equality v. organicism Innovation v. continuity Legitimacy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven, Institute for commercial and insolvency law

Page 1: Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven,  Institute for commercial  and insolvency law

Matthias E. StormeFull professor KU Leuven, Institute for commercial and insolvency law

Symposium “200 years Savigny and Thibaut. The Codification Debate Revisited”Maastricht 10 Oct. 2014

Page 2: Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven,  Institute for commercial  and insolvency law

6 Perspectives

1. Equality v. organicism2. Innovation v. continuity3. Legitimacy4. Transparency v. flexibility5. Digestion or inclusion6. Territoriality

Page 3: Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven,  Institute for commercial  and insolvency law

Sir Edward Coke

• ‘causes which concern life, or inheritance, or goods, or fortunes of (subjects) are not to be decided by natural reason, but by the artificial reason and judgment of law, which law is an act which requires long study and experience before a man can attain to the knowledge of it’

• (Prohibitions del Roy)

Page 4: Matthias E. Storme Full professor KU Leuven,  Institute for commercial  and insolvency law

Antonin Scalia

• ‘The Constitution is meant to protect against, rather than conform to, current ‘widespread belief’

• Maryland v. Craig, 27 juni 1990