Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade...

24
New Source Review Modeling & Impacts Evaluation Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015

Transcript of Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade...

New Source Review Modeling & Impacts Evaluation

Matthew KovarAir Permits Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Environmental Trade Fair 2015

By What Authority?

• TCEQ receives its authority from:• Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter

382 - Clean Air Act (TCAA)

• Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA)

• New minor sources or modifications shall comply with 30 TAC §116.111

• New major sources or major modifications in an attainment or unclassifiable area shall comply with 30 TAC §116.160

Federal Clean Air

Act

Texas Health & Safety

Code

Air Quality Demonstration

• Permit Reviewer determines which air contaminants and review types need to be included in the air quality analysis (AQA)

• Review types are:

• NAAQS

• PSD increments

• State property line

• Health effects

• Each review type has a specific set of associated air contaminants

• Some air contaminants are associated with more than one review type

Air Contaminant Data

Air Quality Demonstration Analysis

Permit ReviewerRequests Modeling

Air Quality Demonstrations

NAAQS:

SO2

NO2

COPSD Increment:SO2

NO2

Property Line:SO2

H2SO4

Health Effects:Styrene

NAAQS

SO2

NO2

CO

PSD Increme

nt

SO2

NO2

Property Line

SO2

H2SO4

Health Effects

Styren

e

Modeling Protocol• If project is major by itself or a major

modification, a protocol is required for all criteria pollutants with an increase:• Must be sent to EPA Region 6 for review

• May include protocol for state-only requirements

• Items to include in protocol are listed in protocol checklist

• Consider all the items in the protocol check list before you start on your protocol documentBefore you start, have a plan.

Modeling Protocol-Be Complete to Be Correct• Provide full documentation and details to

reduce review time and mitigate potential issues

• Protocol document should resemble AQA without modeling results

I wasn’t expecting

this!

Modeling Protocol-Background Info. Needed

• Station information• Time period• Monitored values• How will it be

used?• Justification

Pre-modeling Meeting• If the project is at a minor site or is a minor

modification at a major site, a protocol is not required, but recommended

• Provide a modeling summary two days prior to the pre-modeling meeting to give ADMT time to review and prepare

• Modeling summary includes same items as in protocol

Not aBrainstorming

Session

Pre-modeling Meeting-Tips• Provide full documentation and details to

reduce review time and mitigate potential issues

• Meeting could be for pre-protocol preparation• Meetings are typically conference calls

• Present your plan forthe air quality analysis

• Discuss any concerns or potential issues

Pre-modeling Meeting-Source Type Examples

Power Plants

Loading Racks

Air Quality Analysis• Pre-modeling meeting and/or protocol

increases your chances of a successful project

SUCCESS

AHEAD!

A good plan results in a successful air quality analysis.

Air Quality Analysis-What Is It?

• An addendum to the air permit application

• A stand-alone document

• Includes all information in support of the project

• Describes any deviations or changes from protocol or meeting summary

ModelingApproach

Justification &Supporting

Documentation

ModelingResults

Air Quality Analysis-Be Straightforward & Organized• Include a complete listing of all electronic files

• Summarize results demonstrating compliance

• Reiterate everything from the protocol and/or pre-modeling meeting

• Document any deviations from the protocol and/or pre-modeling meeting

• Present all information in a straightforward and organized fashion

• Provide as much documentation as possible

I would have never

thought to look here!

Avoiding Deficiencies• Deficiencies slow down the process and delay

permit issuance

• Lack of sufficient information

• Incorrect interpretations

Check for inconsistencies between model inputs and air quality analysis.

Avoiding Deficiencies• Deficiencies slow down the process and delay

permit issuance

• Lack of sufficient information

• Incorrect interpretations

Address all comments from meetings.

Monitor Selection Example

Project Site Location

Selected Monitor

Representative Monitor

Inappropriate Fugitive Source Characterization

Appropriate Fugitive Source Characterization

Updates in Modeling

AERMOD - Ambient Ratio Method 2 (ARM2)

• Must consider several factors to use ARM2:

• Tier 1 NOx modeling results

• In-stack NO2/NOx ratio of source

• Ozone background concentrations

Questions?

Contact Information• Matthew Kovar

Air Dispersion Modeling Team

(512) 239-0180

[email protected]

• Daniel MenendezTeam Leader – Air Dispersion Modeling Team

(512) 239-1537

[email protected]