Matthew Effects in Reading
-
Upload
athul-george -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Matthew Effects in Reading
-
7/28/2019 Matthew Effects in Reading
1/2
Matthew Effects in Reading
Stanovich begins his article by exploring the problems with the existing evidences on
the issue. The author observes that for many years, research on individual differences was
plagued by the failure to carry out thorough process analyses on the experimental tasks
employed (Stanovich, 1986, p. 361). Researches on cognitive psychology have made it clear
that one can never come to a comprehensive conclusion regarding performance difference in
reading based on observation of a single task. As such studies on the cognitive processes on
reading need to take into account the casual and reciprocal relationships among variables.
The author argues that an effective model of the development of individual differences in
reading should give primary importance to phonological awareness as it is the most
significant predictor in reading success even though cognitive functioning such as nonverbal
intelligence, vocabulary, and listening comprehension facilitate the development of reading
skills. This emphasises the significance of phonological awareness tasks rather than general
intelligence tests or reading readiness tests. One should also bear in mind that there is a
reciprocal causative relationship between phonological awareness and reading acquisition.
Children during their early reading stages need to grasp the spelling to sound code which will
promote independent decoding in the long run.
The researcher and his colleagues employed a longitudinal research design to test the
hypothesis that poor readers do not rely on context to facilitate word recognition. The study
conducted by the researchers among the first graders in the fall and Spring showed that at a
comparable level ofcontext free decoding ability the recognition efficiency scores of the
less skilled readers actually displayed somewhat more contextual facilitation than those of the
skilled readers (Stanovich, 1986, p. 371-72). This shows that the skilled readers have better
context-free decoding efficiency and superior prediction abilities. Stanovich considers the
Phenomenon of Word Calling as an inappropriate reading strategy as no semantic
-
7/28/2019 Matthew Effects in Reading
2/2
activation takes place in the reader. The consequences of reading history and practice also
exert great influence on reading skill acquisition.
The longitudinal research designs and the reading level match designs employed by
the author for the purpose of the study answer the research question to a certain extent and
keep the doors open for further researches as to the strategies by which the reading
disabilities of the poor readers can best be addressed.