Matter Centricity presentation

42
Matter centricity & KM Matter Lifecycle Management KM for the Modern Law Firm – New York, February 2006 Jeffrey S. Rovner Oz Benamram Matt J. Todd

description

 

Transcript of Matter Centricity presentation

Page 1: Matter Centricity presentation

Matter centricity & KMMatter Lifecycle Management

KM for the Modern Law Firm – New York, February 2006

Jeffrey S. RovnerOz BenamramMatt J. Todd

Page 2: Matter Centricity presentation

Introductions

Oz BenamramPractice Resources AttorneyMorrison & Foerster, [email protected]

Jeffrey S. RovnerDirector of Knowledge ManagementClifford Chance US, LLP

Matt J. ToddVP Knowledge & TechnologySV Technology, Inc.www.svtechnology.com

Page 3: Matter Centricity presentation

Topics for discussion

What’s worth collectingHow do we present what we’ve collectedDiscussion

Page 4: Matter Centricity presentation

Matter-Centric Information

Matter metadata Client/matter number, status, practice group, legal topics, industry,

jurisdiction (etc), court/judge links, description Post completion information, challenges, transaction valueMatter work product Documents, files, e-mails, link to online records, link to discovery

databases, docket, project plan, events and tasksNews About the legal topics, about the industry, about the clientPeople & Entities Responsible partner, other timekeepers on matter, outside parties,

experts, information & linksReference material Client-specific forms, links to relevant legal topic pages, links to matter-

centric pages for similar matters, client bindersFinancial Unbilled time and expenses, accounts receivable, billings vs. budget,

special billing instructions, links to bills sent on the matterTasks Create a letter, document, email, raise invoice, Hot Docs in context

Page 5: Matter Centricity presentation

Matter-Centric Information Client, Matter, Document metadata

Matter metadata Client/matter number, status, practice group, legal topics, industry,

jurisdiction (etc), court/judge links, description Post completion information, challenges, transaction valueMatter work product Documents, files, e-mails, link to online records, link to discovery

databases, docket, project plan, events and tasksNews About the legal topics, about the industry, about the clientPeople & Entities Responsible partner, other timekeepers on matter, outside parties,

experts, information & linksReference material Client-specific forms, links to relevant legal topic pages, links to matter-

centric pages for similar matters, client bindersFinancial Unbilled time and expenses, accounts receivable, billings vs. budget,

special billing instructions, links to bills sent on the matterTasks in context Create a letter, document, email, send invoice, Hot Docs

Page 6: Matter Centricity presentation

Talking points

Is matter the right thing to be “centric” about ?Will people want to work there ?What does it realistically give them ?Is this just a nice idea ?

Page 7: Matter Centricity presentation

How do we present what we’ve captured ?

Traditional Matter PortalAnswer BaseEcco ProInformation Bridge

Page 8: Matter Centricity presentation

Traditional matter portalLawPort

Dynamic views for each client & matterApplication of firm wide taxonomy allow: “Pull” of relevant information to those views without specific

distribution Rotation of information to see different facets Easy access to “know who” and “know how”

Information viewed in the contexts of: Client Practice Group/Team Matter Firm Area of law/subject People Document

Filtered to cut through to focus on interests / location

Page 9: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 10: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 11: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 12: Matter Centricity presentation

It’s All About ContextMatters are the Glue, not the Goal

Oz BenamramFebruary 22, 2006

Answer Base

Page 13: Matter Centricity presentation

Let’s Talk About…

Capturing Knowledge

Finding Information

Rethinking Matter-Centricity

Page 14: Matter Centricity presentation

Capturing Knowledge

Goal: Provide users with answers

(actionable information in context)

Requirements: Capture information for reuse Capture its context for meaning Without creating additional work

Page 15: Matter Centricity presentation

What Should Be Captured?

WhatWho Why WhereWhen

Page 16: Matter Centricity presentation

Who

What

Why

What Should Be Captured?

WhereWhen

Page 17: Matter Centricity presentation

Who

What

Why

External

Internal

People &Entities

Clients &Matters

Documents

What Should Be Captured?

• Outlook • DMS• RMS• Docket• Server

• Conflicts• Accounting• Docket• Marketing• RMS

• Outlook• CRM• Conflicts• Docket• Accounting

• DealRoom• Portal• Wikis • Extranet• Website

Page 18: Matter Centricity presentation

Finding Information – Seeking Answers

Many systems Centralized access – enterprise search

(efficiency)

Many results Ability to zoom-in – multi-faceted search

(findability)

Lack of Context Know more about each result, once found

(usability)

Page 19: Matter Centricity presentation

Contextualizing Information

Manually Profiling Forget about it – 24 Hours; No immediate

incentive

Auto-Profiling Profile documents by mining their text

e.g. entity extraction; auto categorization

Meta-meta-data Connect related information across systems

Page 20: Matter Centricity presentation

Is Matter-Centricity It? (no)

Matters are not the goal The goal is finding answers (mostly, documents

and people)

Matters are the glue Matters contain the relationships among

documents, people, entities, jurisdiction… i.e. their context

Matters are the key ingredient, but not the objective, of providing users with answers (actionable information in context)

Page 21: Matter Centricity presentation

Documents

MattersPeople

Rethinking Matter-Centricity

Page 22: Matter Centricity presentation

People

DocumentsMatters

Rethinking Matter-Centricity

Page 23: Matter Centricity presentation

Answer Base Demo

Presenting Information in Context

Page 24: Matter Centricity presentation

One SimpleSearch Box

Page 25: Matter Centricity presentation

222764 Documents

Narrow Search by Filtering

Filter by Client Industry

SearchResults

Page 26: Matter Centricity presentation

e.g. Financial In

stitutio

ns

Page 27: Matter Centricity presentation

Full Text

Doc ProfileRelated Information

Document Page

Page 28: Matter Centricity presentation

Select One

SearchResults

Page 29: Matter Centricity presentation

Actions

Related People

Select a MatterRelated Matters

Related Docs

Contact Info

Bio

Info

Person Page

Page 30: Matter Centricity presentation

Actions

Related People

Related Docs

Matter Page

Page 31: Matter Centricity presentation

Ecco Pro (R.I.P. 1997)

The power of contextualized views

Page 32: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 33: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 34: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 35: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 36: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 37: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 38: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 39: Matter Centricity presentation

Why add to the number of applications?The Information Bridge

The portal concept sprang from the over abundance of silo applicationsBut added one moreMatter-centricity doesn’t mean the traditional portalWe know that the work is done by many in Outlook or WordPlace the information thereLeveraging context

Page 40: Matter Centricity presentation
Page 41: Matter Centricity presentation

Talking points

Is it working ?Why not ?What actually is the problem - real or perceived problem ?Brent’s point – is matter the right thing to be ‘centric’ about ?Too impersonal, where’s my stuff: emails, tasks, calendar, documents, research, notesInformation with Interest Do I get out of this thing more than I put in ?How do lawyers actually work?Impediments to acceptance Institutional Technology to bring about changeExperience of other industriesFirm v. LawyerTrust Provenance

Page 42: Matter Centricity presentation

Thank You