Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

43
Material cycles and flows
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    238
  • download

    3

Transcript of Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Page 1: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Material cycles and flows

Page 2: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 3: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 4: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Decomposition

Page 5: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 6: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 7: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 8: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 9: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

dL/dt = I – kL , where I = input and k = decomposition rate

Page 10: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 11: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 12: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Decomposer food chains

Page 13: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 14: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Soil populations can be high

Microbial populationsbacteria 100,000,000 - 500,000,000 /g

actinomycetes 1,000,000 /gfungal myceta 5,000,000 /g

Animal populationsnematodes 1,700,00-6,300,000 /m2

springtails & mites 400,000 / m2 (conifer litter)earthworms 10,000 – 1,000,000 /acre

Page 15: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

The Clemson experiment

Day 1: Fresh 17sp

Day 2: Bloated 48 sp

Day 3: Active decay 255 sp

Day 4: Advanced decay426 sp

Day 6: Dry 211 sp

Start with dead baby pig

Observe animal visitors

Page 16: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 17: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 18: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Time course of N and P in pine litter

C/N C/P

Initial 134 2630

1 year 85 1330

2 years 66 912

3 years 53 948

4 years 46 869

Fungal biomass 12 64

Page 19: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

The critical value to measure for organism response is not total N, or even available N, but rate of supply of available N. The same applies to P

Page 20: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 21: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 22: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Terrestrial nitrogen cycle

Nitrogen fixation in nodules

Page 23: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 24: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Denitrifying Bacteria (anaero) Nitrate Bact, 17 kcal/mole

N2 NO3 NO2 Lightning, Photchemical (Nitrobacter) 65 kcal/mole Plants Nitrifying Bacteria

(Nitrosomonas) Nitrogen fixers Ammonifying bacteria

Org N

NH4 Bacteria & bluegreen algae Plants

Terrestrial nitrogen cycle

Page 25: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 26: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Figure 8.6

Page 27: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Figure 8.7

Page 28: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 29: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 30: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Weirs are used to gauge stream flow; nutrient loss is determined by flow times concentration.

Page 31: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Rain gauges and stemflow gauges are used to measure influx in regular rain, rain falling through a canopy, and rain running down tree stems.

Page 32: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Variation in atmospheric contributions of cations with distance from the ocean.

Page 33: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Nutrient concentrations in rain water is increased by flowing down stems or over leaves.

Page 34: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

The standing crop of cations tends to show a net loss compared to atmospheric input, whereas anions and carbon tend to show a net gain.

Page 35: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Water loss to evapotranspiration tends to be relatively constant from year to year, but total stream flow is highly sensitive to overall rainfall.

Page 36: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Season pattern in stream water nitrate levels reflecting spring melt with winter decomposition, and summer drawdown owing to biomass increment.

Page 37: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Note year-to-year variance in stream water nitrate levels at Hubbard Brook, but generally an upward trend resulting from anthropogenic inputs.

Page 38: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Experimental manipulation of a watershed and comparison with a control allowed the impact of disturbance on nutrient dynamics to be assessed.

Page 39: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Cutting of a watershed at Hubbard Brook lead to a dramatic increase in nitrogen release in stream water.

Page 40: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Site Disturbance Cont Dist

Hubbard Brook, NH Kill plants 2 yrs 2.0 97.0

Gale River, NH Commercial clearcut 2.0 38.0

Fernow, WV Commercial clearcut 0.6 3.0

Coweeta, NC Complex 0.05 7.3

Andrews, OR Commercial clearcut 0.08 0.26

Loss of NO3 (mg/l) from control and experimental watersheds.

Page 41: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.
Page 42: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Summary Points – 1–

• Organisms depend on nutrients. Understanding of ecosystem function must include understanding of nutrient influxes, cycling, and losses.

• Decomposition is used to describe a large number of interrelated processes by which organic matter is broken down into particles and to soluble forms of nutrients that are available for plant uptake

• The standing crop of litter can be modeled as input divided by standing crop equals a system-specific decomposition constant that varies with latitude, moisture, temperature, and litter quality.

• Decomposer organisms are important for fragmenting, mixing, and mineralizing dead organic matter

Page 43: Material cycles and flows. Decomposition.

Summary Points – 2–

• The nitrogen cycle has many links that depend on prokaryotic organisms, including nitrogen fixation, ammonification, nitrification, nitrate production, and denitrification.

• System-level studies of nutrient fluxes are often best studied with closed systems such as ponds and watersheds.

• Most nutrient influx to watersheds comes from the atmosphere and from weathering of rock and soil. Anions tend to come from the former and cations from the later.

• Variation in nutrient loss is related to season, recent disturbance events, and the degree to which the system is increasing in biomass.