MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 · Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1..... The...
Transcript of MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 · Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1..... The...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 1 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory
Review Week 1
The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.
The Axiom of ExtensionalityTwo sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.
∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x↔ z ∈ y)→ (x = y)]
The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.
x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )
Subset
A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A↔ x ∈ B)
A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 2 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory
Outline for Week 2
Chapter 2 The Axiomatic Set Theory2.2 The Axiom of Operations2.3 The Power set Axiom
ConclusionAssignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 3 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B.
By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2.2 The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.1)
Let A and B be sets. Then there is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x ∈ B. By the axiom of specification, there is a set Csuch that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 4 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.1)
The set C in theorem 2.1.1 is intersection of A and B, denoted A ∩B ,i.e.,
A ∩B = {x : x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B}
orx ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 5 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.2)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ∩∅ = ∅
2. A ∩A = A (idempotent law)
3. A ∩B = B ∩A (commutative law)
4. A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C (associative law)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 6 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅
For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.
2. Idempotent law A ∩A = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ ∅ = ∅For any x
x ∈ ∅ ↔ x ∈ ∅↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∩ ∅
Thus, A ∩ ∅ = ∅.2. Idempotent law A ∩A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∩A
Thus, A ∩A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 7 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩A
For any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∩B = B ∩AFor any x
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∩A
Hence, A ∩B = B ∩A.
4. Associative law A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∧ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∩ C
So, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩B) ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 8 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B
x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→)
Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A.
By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B.
So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.
(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.
(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A)
By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B)
Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A.
Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B.
So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.3)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ∩B ⊆ A and A ∩B ⊆ B
2. A ∩B = A if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ∩B ⊆ A x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A
A ∩B ⊆ B x ∈ A ∩B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) → x ∈ B
2. A ∩B = A ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∩B = A. By 1, A = A ∩B ⊆ B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∩B ⊆ A) By 1, A ∩B ⊆ A.
(A ⊆ A ∩B) Let x ∈ A. Then x ∈ B. So x ∈ A ∩B or A ⊆ A ∩B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 9 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.4)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C if and only if A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C
2. if A ⊆ B, then (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 10 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C)
Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B.
For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (A ⊆ C)
A ⊆ B ∩ C ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B ∩ C]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)]
↔ ∀x [(x ∈ A→ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A→ x ∈ C)]
↔ A ⊆ B ∧A ⊆ C
2. A ⊆ B → (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) Assume that A ⊆ B. For any x
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ B ∩ C
Therefore, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 11 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.5)
Let A,B,C and D be sets. Then
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 12 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D.
Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∩ C → x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∩D
Hence, A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∩ C = B ∩D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
→ A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∧D ⊆ C
→ B ∩D ⊆ A ∩ C ( By 1 )
Therefore, A ∩ C = B ∩D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 13 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Example (2.2.1)
Give counter examples for convering of the statements in theorem 2.2.5
Solution
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C ⊆ B ∩D → A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∩ C = B ∩D
Converse: A ∩ C = B ∩D → A = B ∧ C = D
A = {1}, C = {2}, B = {3}, D = {4} → A ∩ C = ∅ and B ∩D = ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 14 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.6)
Let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets. Then, for any n ∈ N,
1. if A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn, then
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn),
2. if A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn, then
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 15 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.
Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N.
Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1.
By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1.
By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let n ∈ N and let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets.
1. A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧An ⊆ Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Let P (n) be this statement where n ∈ N.
Basic step : Since A1 ⊆ B1 → A1 ⊆ B1 is true, P (1) holds.Inductive step : Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N. Then
A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ...∧Ak ⊆ Bk → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk)
Suppose that A1 ⊆ B1 ∧A2 ⊆ B2 ∧ ... ∧Ak ⊆ Bk∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By inductionhypothesis,(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩Ak) ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bk) and ∧Ak+1 ⊆ Bk+1. By theorem 2.2.5,
(A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩Ak)∧Ak+1 ⊆ (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bk)∧Bk+1
Hence, P (k + 1) holds. �
2. A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ... ∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ... ∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ... ∩Bn)
Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 16 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Axiom 2.2.1 (Axiom of Union)
Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.7)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.2.7. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
x ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 17 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Axiom 2.2.1 (Axiom of Union)
Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.7)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.2.7. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
x ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 17 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Axiom 2.2.1 (Axiom of Union)
Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.7)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.2.7.
Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
x ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 17 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Axiom 2.2.1 (Axiom of Union)
Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.7)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.2.7. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
x ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 17 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Axiom 2.2.1 (Axiom of Union)
Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.7)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Proof .
Let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.2.7. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
x ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 17 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.2)
The set C in theorem 2.2.7 is union of A and B, denoted A ∪B , i.e.,
A ∪B = {x : x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B} or x ∈ A ∪B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.8)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ∪∅ = A
2. A ∪A = A (idempotent law)
3. A ∪B = B ∪A (commutative law)
4. A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C (associative law)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 18 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.2)
The set C in theorem 2.2.7 is union of A and B, denoted A ∪B , i.e.,
A ∪B = {x : x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B} or x ∈ A ∪B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Theorem (2.2.8)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ∪∅ = A
2. A ∪A = A (idempotent law)
3. A ∪B = B ∪A (commutative law)
4. A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C (associative law)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 18 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.
2. Idempotent law A ∪A = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∪ ∅ = AFor any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ ∅ (∵ x ∈ ∅ is false)↔ x ∈ A ∪ ∅
So, A ∪ ∅ = A.2. Idempotent law A ∪A = A
For any x
x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A ∪A
Thus, A ∪A = A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 19 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪A
For any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Commutative law A ∪B = B ∪AFor any x
x ∈ A ∪B ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B
↔ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ B ∪A
Hence, A ∪B = B ∪A.
4. Associative law A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C
For any x
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ x ∈ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∪ C
Therefore, A ∪ (B ∪ C) = (A ∪B) ∪ C.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 20 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B
x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B
x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B.
By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B.
So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.
(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.
(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B)
Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B.
Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A,
then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B.
Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.
If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done.
Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.
(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B)
By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.9)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B if and only if A ⊆ B
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ A → (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
B ⊆ A ∪B x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) → x ∈ A ∪B
2. A ∪B = B ↔ A ⊆ B
(→) Assume that A ∪B = B. By 1, A ⊆ A ∪B = B. So A ⊆ B.(←) Assume that A ⊆ B.(A ∪B ⊆ B) Let x ∈ A ∪B. Then x ∈ A or x ∈ B.
If x ∈ A, then x ∈ B because A ⊆ B. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.If x ∈ B, it is done. Thus, A ∪B ⊆ B.(B ⊆ A ∪B) By 1, B ⊆ A ∪B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 21 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.10)
Let A,B,C and D be sets. Then
1. if A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D, then A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
2. if A = B and C = D, then A ∪ C = B ∪D
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 22 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D.
Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B,C and D be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ∧ C ⊆ D → A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D
Assume that A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D. Then
x ∈ A ∪ C → x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ D (∵ A ⊆ B and C ⊆ D)
→ x ∈ B ∪D
Thus, A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D.
2. A = B ∧ C = D → A ∪ C = B ∪D
A = B ∧ C = D → A ⊆ B ∨ C ⊆ D
→ A ∪ C ⊆ B ∪D ( By 1 )
A = B ∧ C = D → B ⊆ A ∨D ⊆ C
→ B ∪D ⊆ A ∪ C ( By 1 )
Hence, A ∪ C = B ∪D.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 23 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.11)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C) (distributive law for intersection)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C) (distributive law for union)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 24 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∩B ∨ x ∈ A ∩ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∪B ∧ x ∈ A ∪ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 25 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∩B ∨ x ∈ A ∩ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∪B ∧ x ∈ A ∪ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 25 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∩B ∨ x ∈ A ∩ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∪B ∧ x ∈ A ∪ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 25 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∩B ∨ x ∈ A ∩ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∪B ∧ x ∈ A ∪ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 25 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof .
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ∪ C
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∩B ∨ x ∈ A ∩ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∩B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
2. A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∩ C
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C)
↔ x ∈ A ∪B ∧ x ∈ A ∪ C
↔ x ∈ (A ∪B) ∩ (A ∪ C)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 25 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets.
Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B.
By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.12)
Let A and B be sets. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. Let p(x) be statement x /∈ B. By the axiom of specification , there is a setC such that
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Let C2 be a set satisfyingx ∈ C2 ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thenx ∈ C ↔ x ∈ C2 for all x.
Thus, C = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 26 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.3)
The set C in theorem 2.2.12 is different of A and B, denoted A−B , i.e.,
A−B = {x : x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B} or x ∈ A−B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 27 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false. Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅
Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false. Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x
and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false. Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false. Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false.
Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.13)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A−A = ∅
2. A−∅ = A
3. ∅−A = ∅
4. A−B ⊆ A
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A−A = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A−A ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A,
x ∈ A−A is also false. Hence, A−A has no element or A−A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 28 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A
For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.
3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅
Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x
and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false.
Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.
4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A
For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A− ∅ = A For any x
A− ∅ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, A− ∅ = A.3. ∅−A = ∅ Since x ∈ ∅ ∧ x ∈ A is false for any x and
∅−A ↔ x ∈ ∅ ∧ x /∈ A
x ∈ ∅−A is also false. Hence, ∅−A has no element or ∅−A = ∅.4. A−B ⊆ A For any x
x ∈ A−B ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B
→ x ∈ A
Thus, A−B ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 29 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.14)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B if and only if A−B = ∅
2. if A ⊆ B, then (A− C) ⊆ (B − C)
3. if A = B, then (A− C) = (B − C)
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ↔ A−B = ∅
A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
A * B ↔ ¬∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A−B)
↔ A−B ̸= ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 30 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.14)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B if and only if A−B = ∅
2. if A ⊆ B, then (A− C) ⊆ (B − C)
3. if A = B, then (A− C) = (B − C)
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ↔ A−B = ∅
A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
A * B ↔ ¬∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A−B)
↔ A−B ̸= ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 30 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.14)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B if and only if A−B = ∅
2. if A ⊆ B, then (A− C) ⊆ (B − C)
3. if A = B, then (A− C) = (B − C)
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ↔ A−B = ∅
A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
A * B ↔ ¬∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A−B)
↔ A−B ̸= ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 30 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.14)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B if and only if A−B = ∅
2. if A ⊆ B, then (A− C) ⊆ (B − C)
3. if A = B, then (A− C) = (B − C)
Proof.
Let A,B and C be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ↔ A−B = ∅
A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
A * B ↔ ¬∀x (x ∈ A→ x ∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ ∃x (x ∈ A−B)
↔ A−B ̸= ∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 30 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C)
Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B.
Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C)
Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B.
Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. A ⊆ B → (A− C) ⊆ (B − C) Assume A ⊆ B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
→ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A ⊆ B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) ⊆ (B − C).
3. A = B → (A− C) = (B − C) Assume A = B. Then, for any x,
x ∈ A− C ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ C
↔ x ∈ B ∧ x /∈ C (∵ A = B)
↔ x ∈ B − C
Thus, (A− C) = (B − C).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 31 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Take a BreakFor 10 Minutes
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 32 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.4)
A universal set is the set of all elements under consideration, denoted by
U .
Definition (2.2.5)
Let A be a set with a universal set U . The complement of A, denoted Ac ,is
Ac = U −A = {x : x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A} or x ∈ Ac ↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A).
Note that
x /∈ Ac ↔ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A) (∵ x /∈ U is impossible )
↔ x ∈ A
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 33 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.4)
A universal set is the set of all elements under consideration, denoted by
U .
Definition (2.2.5)
Let A be a set with a universal set U . The complement of A, denoted Ac ,is
Ac = U −A = {x : x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A} or x ∈ Ac ↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A).
Note that
x /∈ Ac ↔ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A) (∵ x /∈ U is impossible )
↔ x ∈ A
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 33 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Definition (2.2.4)
A universal set is the set of all elements under consideration, denoted by
U .
Definition (2.2.5)
Let A be a set with a universal set U . The complement of A, denoted Ac ,is
Ac = U −A = {x : x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A} or x ∈ Ac ↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A).
Note that
x /∈ Ac ↔ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A) (∵ x /∈ U is impossible )
↔ x ∈ A
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 33 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.15)
Let A be a set with a universal set U . Then1 (Ac)c = A
2 ∅c = U3 Uc = ∅4 A ∩Ac = ∅5 A ∪Ac = U
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 34 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .
1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A be a set with a universal set U .1. (Ac)c = A
x ∈ (Ac)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ A
↔ x ∈ A (∵ A ⊆ U)
Thus, (Ac)c = A.
2. ∅c = U
x ∈ ∅c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ ∅↔ x ∈ U (∵ x /∈ ∅ is true )
So, ∅c = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 35 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅
Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x
and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false.
So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.
4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅
Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x
and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false.
So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
3. Uc = ∅ Since x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U is false for any x and
x ∈ Uc ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ U ,
x ∈ Uc is also false. So, Uc has no element or Uc = ∅.4. A ∩Ac = ∅ Since x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A is false for any x and
x ∈ A ∩Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ x ∈ U
x ∈ A ∩Ac is also false. So, A ∩Ac has no element or A ∩Ac = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 36 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
5. A ∪Ac = U
Since x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A is true for any x and
x ∈ A ∪Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A)
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U↔ x ∈ U (∵ A ⊆ U)
Hence, A ∪Ac = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 37 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
5. A ∪Ac = U Since x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A is true for any x
and
x ∈ A ∪Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A)
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U↔ x ∈ U (∵ A ⊆ U)
Hence, A ∪Ac = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 37 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
5. A ∪Ac = U Since x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A is true for any x and
x ∈ A ∪Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A)
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U↔ x ∈ U (∵ A ⊆ U)
Hence, A ∪Ac = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 37 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
5. A ∪Ac = U Since x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A is true for any x and
x ∈ A ∪Ac ↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ Ac
↔ x ∈ A ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)
↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x /∈ A)
↔ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U↔ x ∈ U (∵ A ⊆ U)
Hence, A ∪Ac = U .
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 37 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.16)
Let A and B be sets with a universal set U . Then
1. A−B = A ∩Bc
2. A ⊆ B if and only if Bc ⊆ Ac
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 38 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .
1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc
For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.
2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. A−B = A ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ A ∩Bc ↔ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ U) ∧ x /∈ B
↔ x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B (∵ A ⊆ U)↔ x ∈ A−B
So, A−B = A ∩Bc.2. A ⊆ B ↔ Bc ⊆ Ac
Bc ⊆ Ac ↔ ∀x (x ∈ Bc → x ∈ Ac)
↔ ∀x (x /∈ Ac → x /∈ Bc)
↔ ∀x [¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A)→ ¬(x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [(x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ A)→ (x /∈ U ∨ x ∈ B)]
↔ ∀x [x ∈ A→ x ∈ B] (∵ x /∈ U is false )
↔ A ⊆ B
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 39 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
De Morgan’s Law
Theorem (2.2.17)
Let A and B be sets with a universal set U . Then1 (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc
2 (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 40 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .
1. (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∩B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∩B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∩B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∨ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∨ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∪Bc
So, (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 41 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc
For any x
x ∈ (A ∩B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∩B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∩B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∨ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∨ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∪Bc
So, (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 41 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∩B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∩B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∩B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∨ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∨ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∪Bc
So, (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 41 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∩B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∩B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∩B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∨ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∨ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∪Bc
So, (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 41 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Proof.
Let A and B be a set with a universal set U .1. (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∩B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∩B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∩B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∨ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∨ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∪Bc
So, (A ∩B)c = Ac ∪Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 41 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc
For any x
x ∈ (A ∪B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∪B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∪B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∩Bc
Thus, (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 42 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∪B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∪B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∪B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∩Bc
Thus, (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 42 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∪B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∪B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∪B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∩Bc
Thus, (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 42 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
2. (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc For any x
x ∈ (A ∪B)c ↔ x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A ∪B
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∪B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ ¬(x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B)
↔ x ∈ U ∧ (x /∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ A) ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ x /∈ B)
↔ x ∈ Ac ∧ x ∈ Bc
↔ x ∈ Ac ∩Bc
Thus, (A ∪B)c = Ac ∩Bc.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 42 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Operations
Theorem (2.2.18)
Let A,B and C be sets. Then
1. A− (B ∩ C) = (A−B) ∪ (A− C)
2. A− (B ∪ C) = (A−B) ∩ (A− C)
Proof. Assignment 2
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 43 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2.3 The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.1 (Axiom of Power set)
Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.1)
Let A be a set. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set and let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.3.1. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ x ⊆ A
x ∈ C2 ↔ x ⊆ A
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 44 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2.3 The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.1 (Axiom of Power set)
Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.1)
Let A be a set. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set and let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.3.1. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ x ⊆ A
x ∈ C2 ↔ x ⊆ A
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 44 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2.3 The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.1 (Axiom of Power set)
Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.1)
Let A be a set. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set and let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.3.1.
Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ x ⊆ A
x ∈ C2 ↔ x ⊆ A
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 44 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2.3 The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.1 (Axiom of Power set)
Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.1)
Let A be a set. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set and let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.3.1. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ x ⊆ A
x ∈ C2 ↔ x ⊆ A
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 44 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2.3 The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.1 (Axiom of Power set)
Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.1)
Let A be a set. There is a unique set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set and let C1 and C2 be sets satisfying condition of theorem 2.3.1. Then
x ∈ C1 ↔ x ⊆ A
x ∈ C2 ↔ x ⊆ A
∴ x ∈ C1 ↔ x ∈ C2
Therefore, C1 = C2.Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 44 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Definition (2.3.1)
The set C in therorem 2.3.1 is a power set of A, denoted P(A) , i.e.,
P(A) = {x : x ⊆ A} or x ∈ P(A) ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.2)
Let A be a set. Then
1. A ∈ P(A)
2. ∅ ∈ P(A)
3. P (∅) = {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 45 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Definition (2.3.1)
The set C in therorem 2.3.1 is a power set of A, denoted P(A) , i.e.,
P(A) = {x : x ⊆ A} or x ∈ P(A) ↔ x ⊆ A.
Theorem (2.3.2)
Let A be a set. Then
1. A ∈ P(A)
2. ∅ ∈ P(A)
3. P (∅) = {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 45 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.
1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A)
Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A)
Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A be a set.1. A ∈ P(A) Since A ⊆ A, A ∈ P(A).
2. ∅ ∈ P(A) Since ∅ ⊆ A, ∅ ∈ P(A).
3. P(∅) = {∅}
x ∈ P(∅) ↔ x ⊆ ∅↔ x = ∅ ( By theorem 2.1.15 )
↔ x ∈ {∅}
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 46 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.1)
Draw Hasse diagram of all elements of power set A = {x, y, z}.
Solution
P(A) = {∅, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}
{x, y, z}
{x, y} {y, z} {x, z}
{y} {x} {z}
∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 47 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.1)
Draw Hasse diagram of all elements of power set A = {x, y, z}.
Solution
P(A) = {∅, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}
{x, y, z}
{x, y} {y, z} {x, z}
{y} {x} {z}
∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 47 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.1)
Draw Hasse diagram of all elements of power set A = {x, y, z}.
Solution
P(A) = {∅, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}
{x, y, z}
{x, y} {y, z} {x, z}
{y} {x} {z}
∅
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 47 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A.
Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively,
are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that
(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.3)
If a set has n elements, then its power set will contain 2n elements.
Proof .
Let n be the number of elements of A. Then numbers of subset sets of A which have
0, 1, 2, ..., n elements,
respectively, are (n0
),
(n1
),
(n2
), ...,
(nn
).
By binomial theorem, it implies that(n0
)+
(n1
)+
(n2
)+ · · ·+
(nn
)= 2n.
Thus, the number of elements in the power set A is 2n.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 48 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.2)
Compute number of elements of a power set
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}.
Solution
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}A = {0,±3,±6, ...,±99}
Hence, A has number of elements to be 33× 2 + 1 = 67.Therefore, number of elements of P(A) is 267.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 49 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.2)
Compute number of elements of a power set
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}.
Solution
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}A = {0,±3,±6, ...,±99}
Hence, A has number of elements to be 33× 2 + 1 = 67.Therefore, number of elements of P(A) is 267.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 49 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.2)
Compute number of elements of a power set
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}.
Solution
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}A = {0,±3,±6, ...,±99}
Hence, A has number of elements to be 33× 2 + 1 = 67.
Therefore, number of elements of P(A) is 267.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 49 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Example (2.3.2)
Compute number of elements of a power set
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}.
Solution
A = {x ∈ Z : |x| < 100 and 3 | x}A = {0,±3,±6, ...,±99}
Hence, A has number of elements to be 33× 2 + 1 = 67.Therefore, number of elements of P(A) is 267.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 49 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.4)
Let A and B be sets. Then
1. A ⊆ B if and only if P(A) ⊆ P(B)
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 50 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.
1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).
(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Proof.
Let A and B be sets.1. A ⊆ B ↔ P(A) ⊆ P(B)
(→) Assume A ⊆ B.
x ∈ P(A) → x ⊆ A
→ x ⊆ B (∵ A ⊆ B)
→ x ∈ P(B)
Thus, P(A) ⊆ P(B).(←) Assume P(A) ⊆ P(B).
x ∈ A → {x} ⊆ A
→ {x} ∈ P(A)
→ {x} ∈ P(B) (∵ P(A) ⊆ P(B))
→ {x} ⊆ B
→ x ∈ B
Thus, A ⊆ B.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 51 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B)
For any x
x ∈ P(A) ∩ P(B) ↔ x ∈ P(A) ∧ x ∈ P(B)
↔ x ⊆ A ∧ x ⊆ B
↔ x ⊆ A ∩B ( By theorem 2.2.5)↔ x ∈ P(A ∩B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
x ∈ P(A) ∪ P(B) → x ∈ P(A) ∨ x ∈ P(B)
→ x ⊆ A ∨ x ⊆ B
→ x ⊆ A ∪B ∨ x ⊆ A ∪B (∵ A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B)
→ x ∈ P(A ∪B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 52 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B) For any x
x ∈ P(A) ∩ P(B) ↔ x ∈ P(A) ∧ x ∈ P(B)
↔ x ⊆ A ∧ x ⊆ B
↔ x ⊆ A ∩B ( By theorem 2.2.5)↔ x ∈ P(A ∩B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
x ∈ P(A) ∪ P(B) → x ∈ P(A) ∨ x ∈ P(B)
→ x ⊆ A ∨ x ⊆ B
→ x ⊆ A ∪B ∨ x ⊆ A ∪B (∵ A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B)
→ x ∈ P(A ∪B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 52 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B) For any x
x ∈ P(A) ∩ P(B) ↔ x ∈ P(A) ∧ x ∈ P(B)
↔ x ⊆ A ∧ x ⊆ B
↔ x ⊆ A ∩B ( By theorem 2.2.5)↔ x ∈ P(A ∩B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
x ∈ P(A) ∪ P(B) → x ∈ P(A) ∨ x ∈ P(B)
→ x ⊆ A ∨ x ⊆ B
→ x ⊆ A ∪B ∨ x ⊆ A ∪B (∵ A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B)
→ x ∈ P(A ∪B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 52 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B) For any x
x ∈ P(A) ∩ P(B) ↔ x ∈ P(A) ∧ x ∈ P(B)
↔ x ⊆ A ∧ x ⊆ B
↔ x ⊆ A ∩B ( By theorem 2.2.5)↔ x ∈ P(A ∩B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
x ∈ P(A) ∪ P(B) → x ∈ P(A) ∨ x ∈ P(B)
→ x ⊆ A ∨ x ⊆ B
→ x ⊆ A ∪B ∨ x ⊆ A ∪B (∵ A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B)
→ x ∈ P(A ∪B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 52 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
2. P(A ∩B) = P(A) ∩ P(B) For any x
x ∈ P(A) ∩ P(B) ↔ x ∈ P(A) ∧ x ∈ P(B)
↔ x ⊆ A ∧ x ⊆ B
↔ x ⊆ A ∩B ( By theorem 2.2.5)↔ x ∈ P(A ∩B)
3. P(A ∪B) ⊇ P(A) ∪ P(B)
x ∈ P(A) ∪ P(B) → x ∈ P(A) ∨ x ∈ P(B)
→ x ⊆ A ∨ x ⊆ B
→ x ⊆ A ∪B ∨ x ⊆ A ∪B (∵ A ⊆ A ∪B and B ⊆ A ∪B)
→ x ∈ P(A ∪B)
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 52 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.2 (The Axiom of Regularity)
Every non-empty set x contains a member y such that x and y are disjoint sets.
∀x [∃a (a ∈ x) → ∃y (y ∈ x ∧ ¬∃z (z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y))]
In other word, for any A ̸= ∅, there exists C ∈ A such that
∀x [x ∈ C → x /∈ A] or C ∩A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 53 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Axiom 2.3.2 (The Axiom of Regularity)
Every non-empty set x contains a member y such that x and y are disjoint sets.
∀x [∃a (a ∈ x) → ∃y (y ∈ x ∧ ¬∃z (z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y))]
In other word, for any A ̸= ∅, there exists C ∈ A such that
∀x [x ∈ C → x /∈ A] or C ∩A = ∅.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 53 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.5)
For any set A, A /∈ A.
Proof .
Let A be a set. We will prove by contradiction. Suppose that A ∈ A.Since A ∈ {A}, A ∈ A ∩ {A}. So,
A ∩ {A} ̸= ∅ (1)
Since {A} ̸= ∅ by the axiom of regularity , there is set C ∈ {A} such that C ∩ {A} = ∅.
But C ∈ {A}means that C = A, so A ∩ {A} = ∅.
It contradics (1).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 54 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Theorem (2.3.11)
For set A and B, A /∈ B or B /∈ A.
Proof .
Let A and B be sets. We will prove by contradiction. Suppose that A ∈ B and B ∈ A. SinceA ∈ {A,B} and B ∈ {A,B},
(A ∈ B ∩ {A,B}) ∧ (B ∈ A ∩ {A,B}) (2)
Since {A,B} ̸= ∅ by the axiom of regularity , there is set C ∈ {A,B} such thatC ∩ {A,B} = ∅. But C ∈ {A,B}means that C = A or C = B, so
A ∩ {A,B} = ∅ or B ∩ {A,B} = ∅.
It contradics (2).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 55 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Conclusion
The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the sameelements.The Axiom of Specification To every set A and to every condition p(x) therecorresponds a set B whose elements are exactly those elements x of A for which p(x)holds.Axiom of Union Let A and B be sets. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B).
Axiom of Power set Let A be a set. There is a set C satisfying
x ∈ C ↔ x ⊆ A.
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 56 / 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Aixiomatic Set Theory The Power Set Axiom
Assignment 2 (30 Minutes)
1. (EVEN and ODD) Let A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bn be sets. Then, for any n ∈ N,
A1 = B1 ∧A2 = B2 ∧ ...∧An = Bn → (A1 ∩A2 ∩ ...∩An) = (B1 ∩B2 ∩ ...∩Bn).
2. Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that
(a) (EVEN) A− (B ∩ C) = (A−B) ∪ (A− C)
(b) (ODD) A− (B ∪ C) = (A−B) ∩ (A− C)
3. (EVEN and ODD) Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4}.
(a) Cumpute numbers of subset sets of A which have 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 elements by binomialtheorem.
(b) Write out elements of P(A).(c) Draw Hasse diagram of elements of P(A).
Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAT1202 SET THEORY :Week2 57 / 1