Masters Read Write Key

8/10/2019 Masters Read Write Key

1/4

ANGLIA EXAMINATION SYNDICATE

Masters Level Paper 4 skills 2014 Key and Mark Scheme

1

Section R1 (10 marks)

1 mark for each correct answer.

1. D

2. B

3. B

4. B

5. A

6. C

7. B

8. C

9. D

10. D


1 mark for each correct number placed below a letter.

A B C D E F G H I J

9 13 6 7 12 2 8 1 15 11


1 mark for each correct word inserted in a gap. No marks if more than one word is inserted, even if

the sentence is correct. No marks if the spelling is incorrect.

1. one

2. grapevine

3. rocket

4.

doubt

5. teeth

6.

track7. sailing

8.

limb

9. house

10. cloud

Section W2 (10 marks)

1 mark for each fully correct answer with no mistakes. No half marks.

1.

We have the same conversation year in, year out.2. Well have to muddle through with what weve got.

3. James is an expert on everything, with the exception of politics.

4. Will Simons ability to drive be affected by his broken toe?


2/4



2

5. We all need to get behind him on this one.

6.

He really takes us for granted.

7.

He always passes/ is always passing the buck.

8. His arrival surprised us all.

9. Under no circumstances should/must this document be shown to the staff.

10.

He is considered to be the best artist of his generation.


A single mark out of 15 is awarded for both parts of section W3. Give marks according to the

following mark scheme.

Content organisation 5 marks

Accuracy and appropriacy 5 marksTask completion (including range of language) 5 marks


3/4



3

Section R4 Part One (10 marks)

1 mark for each definition.

Exampleanswers, there may be acceptable variations:

a. exampleexceeded / surpassed

b. deterioration [accept destruction] of the environment

c. wealth/ plenty

d. cultured/ sophisticated expressions

e. causing/creating changes

f. become congested

g. Necessity / requirement

h. our resources are lessening

i. distributed/ apportionedj. unselfish/ selfless

k. model/ standard

Section R4 Part Two (10 marks)

Writing criteria apply.

Candidates should make reference to at least 4 of the following (2 marks each)

A further 2 marks should be awarded for linking of ideas and natural flow.

Saves money

Helps the environment

Encourages communication/ face-to-face interaction

Increases output by using goods more

Creates jobs in areas such as distributing/ couriering


4/4



4


Writing criteria apply.

At this level the composition must have a clear introduction, middle and end. It must answer the question,

examining whether intellectual property law is just and workable, or unrealistic, and end by giving a

rational opinion based on the argument presented.

It must not be full of repetition, either in vocabulary or in structure, unless specifically and deliberately for

rhetorical purposes. It must have a consistent style which fits an academic discussion, although some

informality can be accepted if it can be seen to be used for stylistic effect. It must not have mother-tongue

interference, or grammatical mistakes, although some error is acceptable if it is spelling or a common error

which native speakers also often make.

The title must be adhered to, the argument presented must be directly related to the title given and not to a

variation invented by the candidate. There must be clear paragraphing, with an introduction and a

conclusion. Good, natural, cohesive and linking devices between paragraphs and sentences must be used.

The marker should ignore the rough notes; they are for the candidate's use only.

The mnemonic and acronym CART should be used to assess the composition on each of the criteria below

in order to judge it against the above outline description.

C ontent organisation (paragraphing, linking devices, pacing and logic)

A ccuracy and appropriacy of language (number and type of errors, mistakes; correct style and tone)

R ange of vocabulary and structure evidenced (versatility with words and structures to fit context;

lack of repetition)

T ask fulfilment (clear and robust answering the question posed in the title,

not deviating from it or twisting it)

Maximum 5 marks for each of the above criteria:

1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks 5 marks

Is definitely not

C2 level in the

criteria. Does notinspire the reader

to feel the writer

is fully confident

in the category as

an expert in

English.

Is approaching

C2 level in the

criteria but is notquite there in

giving good

evidence of being

an expert in

English.

Just reaches pass

level for C2, i.e.

shows evidence offull competence as

a literate and

confident expert

in English in the

criteria. Minor

stumbles, no more

notable than a

native speaker

might make.

Is definitely well

inside the C2

boundary for thecategory.

Impressive use of

English giving the

reader full

confidence in the

writers

versatility, ability

and expertise in

English.

Fulfils the criteria

perfectly. No

more could beasked of the

candidate.

Masters Read Write Key

Documents

Transcript of Masters Read Write Key