Mast Cell Involvement in the Pathophysiology of Migraine Headache: A Hypothesis
Transcript of Mast Cell Involvement in the Pathophysiology of Migraine Headache: A Hypothesis
Headache ISSN 0017-8748C© 2006 by American Headache Society doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00485.xPublished by Blackwell Publishing
Emerging Neural Theories of MigrainePathogenesis
Mast Cell Involvement in the Pathophysiology of MigraineHeadache: A Hypothesis
Dan Levy, PhD; Rami Burstein, PhD; Andrew M. Strassman, PhD
Migraine attacks are triggered by a variety of conditions including endogenous and exogenous factors. Evidencesuggests that activation and sensitization of primary afferent meningeal nociceptive neurons, the peripheral armof the trigeminovascular system, constitutes one of the earliest events promoting the intracranial pain of migraine.However, the link between the varied triggering factors and activation of meningeal nociceptive neurons is not com-pletely understood. Local inflammation with release of mediators from local immune/inflammatory cells is thoughtto play a critical role in such neuronal response. Meningeal mast cells may play such a role by virtue of their proximityboth to meningeal blood vessels and nociceptive axons and their ability to release a host of proinflammatory/algesicmediators. This paper reviews data relevant to the hypothesis that mast cells, upon activation by migraine triggers,contribute to the genesis of migraine headache. Epidemiologic findings, clinical data, and observations on anatomi-cal and physiological characteristics of mast cells converge to suggest an important role of these immune cells in thepathogenesis of migraine. Migraine triggers might directly or indirectly promote mediator secretion from meningealmast cells, and thereby cause inflammation and activation of the trigeminovascular system. While consistent, theevidence supporting mast cell involvement in the genesis of migraine is largely circumstantial to date. Further studiesare needed to test directly the nature of mast cell involvement in the pathogenesis of migraine headache.
Key words: migraine, headache, mast cell, allergy, inflammation, trigeminal
(Headache 2006;46[Suppl 1]:S13-S18)
Migraine, a chronic disease afflicting a substan-
tial proportion of the population, is generally charac-
terized by severe, throbbing headache accompanied
by nausea and vomiting with enhanced sensitivity to
light, sound, and smells. It is widely accepted that the
intracranial throbbing pain of migraine is mediated
primarily by neuronal activity along the trigeminovas-
From the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, BethIsrael Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School,Boston, Massachusetts.
Address all correspondence to Dr. Dan Levy, Department ofAnesthesia and Critical Care, Headache Research Labora-tory, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur,Boston, MA 02115.
cular pathway. Activation and sensitization of primary
afferent nociceptive neurons that innervate the in-
tracranial meninges and their related blood vessels (ie,
meningeal nociceptors) is thought to be the first step
in driving this sensory nociceptive system to promote
the sensation of pain. While the exact mechanisms un-
derlying activation and sensitization of meningeal no-
ciceptors are not completely understood, local inflam-
mation and release of mediators are thought to play a
key role. Triggering mechanisms underlying these im-
mune and neuronal responses are currently unknown.
Migraine attacks are triggered by a variety of
conditions.1-3 Hypothesized endogenous triggers in-
clude abnormal cortical activity reflected in the phe-
nomenon of cortical spreading depression, which is a
S13
S14 June 2006
slowly propagating ionic disturbance within the cere-
bral cortex that has been implicated in the migraine
aura,4-6 hyperexcitability of the parasympathetic sys-
tem,7 release of hormones involved in the stress re-
sponse, and in female patients changes in the level of
sex hormones associated with the menstrual cycle. Ex-
ogenous triggers may include dietary elements such as
cheese, chocolate, coffee, wine, and changes in weather
patterns.
The notion that all of these seemingly unrelated
factors are linked to the emergence of the episodic
intracranial head pain of migraine raises the possibil-
ity of a single biological phenomenon that is impinged
upon by these various triggers and that plays a criti-
cal role in promoting meningeal inflammation and the
ensuing activation and sensitization of meningeal no-
ciceptors.
The emergence of a local inflammatory response
in the meninges is widely accepted as a potential
contributor to the activation and sensitization of
meningeal nociceptors during migraine.8 Activation of
resident immune cells such as macrophages and mast
cells, which are a prominent feature of the intracranial
meninges, is likely to serve as a critical step in promot-
ing the enhanced excitability of meningeal nociceptors.
Meningeal mast cells are of special interest by virtue
of their proximity to meningeal blood vessels and pain
fibers, their ability to release a host of pronociceptive
mediators, and their propensity to be activated by the
various migraine triggering phenomena.9
BIOLOGY OF MAST CELLSMast cells are ubiquitous immunocompetent cells
that participate in numerous physiological and patho-
physiological conditions. Mast cells originate in the
bone marrow and migrate into connective tissues and
mucosal surfaces, where they gain mature morphologic
and functional characteristics under the influence of
local microenvironmental factors.10 While mast cells
share many characteristics such as their prototypical
cytoplasmic granules, they differ in characteristics in-
cluding size, granule contents, and receptor expres-
sion.11
Although mostly known for their role in allergic
responses, mast cells are important cellular compo-
nents that mediate other immune responses. Activa-
tion of mast cells results in the release of granule-
associated mediators (ie, degranulation) including his-
tamine, serotonin, nerve growth factor, proinflamma-
tory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6, and
various proteases such as tryptase. In various acti-
vation modes, mast cells can also generate de novolipid-derived mediators, including leukotrienes and
prostanoids, and can synthesize nitric oxide. Histor-
ically, the primary cause of mast cell activation has
been considered to be the cross-linking of the high-
affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) by IgE and multivalent
antigen—a process that culminates in the explosive
release of preformed mediators (ie, immunological
activation) to produce the typical anaphylactic aller-
gic responses. However, in recent years, non-antigenic
pathways of activation have also been implicated in
many pathologic conditions. For example, free im-
munoglobulin, hormones, various cytokines, and vanil-
loid compounds are known to promote mediator secre-
tion from mast cells. Polycationic compounds such as
the neuropeptide substance P and bradykinin are also
known to promote mast cell activation and degranula-
tion. It should be noted that such mode of activation is
mediated through a src-like cytosolic protein tyrosine
kinases; an identical biochemical pathway is activated
following the cross-linking of the high affinity IgE re-
ceptor on mast cells by antigen.12
NEUROIMMUNE INTERACTIONSINVOLVING MAST CELLS
A functional neuroimmune interaction involving
mast cells and nociceptive neurons is supported by (1)
the close proximity of mast cells to nociceptive nerve
endings in many cutaneous and deep tissues includ-
ing dermis, temporomandibular and knee joints, blad-
der, and meninges; (2) the activation of mast cells by
neuropeptide secreted from nociceptors (neurogenic
inflammation); (3) the secretion by mast cells of a mul-
titude of mediators capable of interacting with noci-
ceptors; and (4) their putative contribution to inflam-
matory chronic painful conditions such as interstitial
cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, and arthritis.13-15
Based on their prominent location in the meninges
and their activation by a neurogenic, substance P-
dependent process,16-18 mast cells were also suggested
to play a possible role in migraine.9 Several lines of
Headache S15
evidence support the notion that mast cell activation
and mediator release promote neuronal changes re-
flecting neuronal hyperexcitability. For example, mast
cells were implicated in promoting enhanced excitabil-
ity of airways and the small intestine vagal afferent19,20
and enhanced neurotransmission in sympathetic gan-
glia.21 However, it is unclear whether mast cell acti-
vation, the ensuing release of mediators, and down-
stream events such as leukocyte recruitment or other
mast cells-related inflammatory responses can alter
the electrophysiological properties of nociceptors to
promote activation of nociceptive pathways.
CLINICAL EVIDENCE FOR MAST CELLINVOLVEMENT IN MIGRAINE
Allergic Diseases and Migraine.—Epidemio-
logical studies suggest an association between mi-
graine and mast cell-related diseases such as asthma
and allergies.22-24 In addition to data on comorbidi-
ties, compelling evidence suggests that maternal mi-
graine may be associated with an increased risk of mast
cell-related asthma and eczema in children,25 a finding
that further eludes to a possible genetic link between
mast cell-related diseases and migraine. The biologi-
cal mechanism underlying an association between mi-
graine and atopic diseases, however, has not been elu-
cidated to date.
Additional support for a possible involvement
of mast cell in migraine comes from clinical stud-
ies reporting migraine-like symptoms that are asso-
ciated with allergy season26 and allergic-related nasal
and ocular symptoms that frequently accompany mi-
graine.27-29 In fact, many self-diagnosed sinus-related
headaches appear to be rediagnosed as migraine.26
Other allergic-like symptoms, including nausea, vom-
iting, diarrhea, malaise, and fatigue also accompany
migraine attacks.30 Of particular interest is the phe-
nomenon of cyclic vomiting syndrome, a childhood
form of abdominal migraine that has been suggested
to be associated with changes in gastrointestinal dys-
motility and that can also be explained by allergic hy-
persensitivity.
That mast cells may play a role in migraine is
also consistent with data from studies of inflammatory
mediators. Increased levels of plasma histamine and
tryptase, both markers of mast cell activation, as well as
other mast cell mediators such as the cytokines TNF-α
and IL-1 have been observed in migraine.31-35 Further
support comes from another line of studies showing
that systemic administration of histamine can promote
migraine-like headache in susceptible individuals36,37
and that antihistaminergic agents may serve as pro-
phylactic migraine treatment.38
That certain foods, many of which cause allergic-
like symptoms in standard laboratory tests, are mi-
graine triggers for some patients is also consistent
with mast cell-mediated component of migraine.37,39-42
Across studies of varying quality, some of which were
placebo-controlled, 30% to 55% of migraine patients
experienced improvement in migraine by avoiding
specific foods.37,39-42 Although the nature of food-
induced migraine headache is not well understood,
the clinical evidence of effective prophylaxis using the
mast cell stabilizer cromolyn43-47 provides further sup-
port for a possible link between mast cells and mi-
graine.
Although migraine might share some of the bio-
logical underpinnings of mast cell-related symptoms, it
is clear that not all allergic reactions or asthma attacks
arising from antigen binding, IgE receptor cross link-
ing, and explosive mast cell degranulation culminate
in migraine headache. Whether elevated serum levels
of IgE found in migraine patients could alone play a
role in migraine even in the absence of antigen needs
to be further evaluated. One notion is that aggregation
of the Fc IgE receptor itself could lead at some point to
a preferential release of inflammatory mediators.48 In
addition, such aggregation may also render meningeal
mast cell more sensitive to other migraine triggering
factors (discussed below).
Nonimmunological Activation of Mast Cells inMigraine.—Although the nature of the relationships
among mast cells, allergies, and migraine is still a mat-
ter of debate, migraine was also linked to other nonal-
lergic conditions that involve mast cell activation. For
example, the incidence of migraine is increased in in-
terstitial cystitis and irritable bowel syndrome,9 both
of which involve “nonallergic” mast cell activation in
the absence of serum IgE elevations. Thus, it can be
argued that mast cells could play a role in migraine
pathophysiology by means of non-IgE-dependent
processes. One established migraine precipitator is
S16 June 2006
psychological stress, which has been shown to promote
activation of meningeal mast cells and local inflamma-
tory reaction,49 possibly through corticotropin releas-
ing hormone-related process.
Another migraine trigger that might be related
to mast cells is changes in ovarian sex hormone lev-
els associated with menstruation. Additional work by
Theoharides’ group has shown the presence of estro-
gen receptors on meningeal mast cells50 and the ability
of estrogen to influence meningeal mast cell secretion.
Whether such receptors play a role in promoting ac-
tivation of the trigeminovascular system warrants fur-
ther examination.
A dysfunctional parasympathetic system has been
suggested to play an important role in migraine.7
Migraine-related “allergic” symptoms such as lacrima-
tion and teary eyes were suggested to be related to an
enhanced parasympathetic tone. Although the mech-
anisms underlying such autonomic changes are not
well understood, a possible mechanism linking them
to cortical spreading depression has recently been sug-
gested.51 While mechanisms relating activation of the
parasympathetic system and the pain of migraine are
currently unknown, local meningeal interaction be-
tween parasympathetic neurons and mast cells may
play a role.52,53
Although the idea of mast cell involvement in mi-
graine, especially as an aspect of allergic disease, gener-
ated considerable excitement in the 1980s,54,55 medical
literature of the 1990s and this decade contains rela-
tively few references for mast cell contribution to mi-
graine. The apparent waning of interest in these ideas
might be attributed at least in part to the 1988 pub-
lication and subsequent widespread adoption of the
International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic cri-
teria for headache. The IHS criteria compartmentalize
headache diagnoses into discrete, nonoverlapping en-
tities. For example, the criteria do not mention nasal
drainage or other similar symptoms as defining charac-
teristics of migraine but list purulent nasal discharge as
a defining characteristic of acute sinus headache.56,57
The wholesale adoption of the IHS diagnostic crite-
ria may have resulted in an exclusionary approach to
defining headache types that discouraged scientific in-
quiry into hypotheses such as that of the role of allergy
and mast cells in migraine pathophysiology.
CONCLUSIONSEpidemiologic data, clinical observations, and
anatomical and physiological characteristics of
meningeal mast cells converge to suggest an impor-
tant role of these immune/inflammatory cells in the
pathogenesis of migraine. Migraine triggers might
directly or indirectly activate meningeal mast cells,
which through release of inflammatory mediators
could cause activation of the trigeminovascular
system. While consistent, the evidence supporting this
hypothesis is largely circumstantial to date. Further
studies are needed to test directly the nature of mast
cell involvement in the pathogenesis of migraine.
REFERENCES
1. Bolay H, Moskowitz MA. The emerging impor-
tance of cortical spreading depression in migraine
headache. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2005;161:655-657.
2. Blau JN. Migraine triggers: Practice and theory.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992;40:367-372.
3. Robbins L. Precipitating factors in migraine: A retro-
spective review of 494 patients. Headache. 1994;34:
214-216.
4. Milner PM. Note on a possible correspondence be-
tween the scotomas of migraine and spreading de-
pression of Leao. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-physiol Suppl. 1958;10:705.
5. Lauritzen M. Pathophysiology of the migraine aura:
The spreading depression theory. Brain. 1994;177:
199-210.
6. Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M, Wu O, Schwartz
D, Bakker D, Fischl B, et al. Mechanisms of migraine
aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cor-
tex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4687-4692.
7. Burstein R, Jakubowski M. Unitary hypothesis for
multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine. JComp Neurol. 2005;493:9-14.
8. Waeber C, Moskowitz A. Migraine as an inflamma-
tory disorder. Neurology. 2005;64(suppl 2):S9-S15.
9. Theoharides TC, Donelan J, Kandere-Grzybowska
K, Konstantinidou A. The role of mast cells in mi-
graine pathophysiology. Brain Res Rev. 2005;49:65-
76.
10. Metcalfe DD, Baram D, Mekori YA. Mast cells. Phys-iol Rev. 1997;77:1033-1079.
11. Mekori YA, Metcalfe DD. Mast cells in innate immu-
nity. Immunol Rev. 2000;173:131-140.
12. Shefler I, Sagi-Eisenberg R. Gi-mediated activation
Headache S17
of the Syk kinase by the receptor mimetic basic
secretagogues of mast cells: Role in mediating
arachidonic acid/metabolites release. J Immunol.2001;167:475-481.
13. Theoharides TC, Cochrane DE. Critical role of mast
cells in inflammatory diseases and the effect of acute
stress. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;146:1-12.
14. Nigrovic PA, Lee DM. Mast cells in inflammatory
arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:1-11.
15. Barbara G, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R, Cremon C,
Cottrell GS, Santini D, et al. Activated mast cells in
proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal
pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology.2004;126:693-702.
16. Janiszewski J, Bienenstock J, Blennerhasset MG. Pi-
comolar doses of substance P trigger electrical re-
sponses in mast cells without degranulation. Am JPhysiol. 1994;267:C138-C145.
17. Ottosson A, Edvinsson L. Release of histamine from
dural mast cells by substance P and calcitonin gene-
related peptide. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:166-174.
18. Dimitriadou V, Buzzi MG, Moskowitz MA, Theo-
harides TC. Trigeminal sensory fiber stimulation in-
duces morphological changes reflecting secretion in
rat dura mater mast cells. Neuroscience. 1991;44:97-
112.
19. Ahluwalia A, De Felipe C, O’Brien J, Hunt SP,
Perretti M. Impaired IL-1beta-induced neutrophil
accumulation in tachykinin NK1 receptor knockout
mice. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;124:1013-1015.
20. Riccio MM, Myers AC, Undem BJ. Immunomodula-
tion of afferent neurons in guinea-pig isolated airway.
J Physiol. 1996;491:499-509.
21. Weinreich D, Undem BJ. Immunological regulation
of synaptic transmission in isolated guinea pig auto-
nomic ganglia. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:1529-1532.
22. Low NC, Merikangas KR. The comorbidity of mi-
graine. CNS Spectr. 2003;8:433,434, 437-444.
23. Merikangas KR, Rasmussen BK. Migraine comor-
bidity. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch KM, eds.
The Headaches. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins; 2000:235-240.
24. Bigal ME, Sheftell FD, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ,
Lipton RB. Chronic daily headache: Identification of
factors associated with induction and transformation.
Headache. 2002;42:575-581.
25. Chen TC, Leviton A. Asthma and eczema in chil-
dren born to women with migraine. Arch Neurol.1990;47:1227-1230.
26. Cady RK, Dodick DW, Levine HL, Schreiber CP,
Eross EJ, Setzen M, et al. Sinus headache: A neurol-
ogy, otolaryngology, allergy, and primary care con-
sensus on diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc.2005;80:908-916.
27. Wilson CWM, Kirker JG, Warnes H, O’Malley M.
The clinical features of migraine as a manifestation
of allergic disease. Postgrad Med J. 1980;56:617-621.
28. Monro J, Carini C, Brostoff J. Migraine is a food-
allergic disease. Lancet. 1984;2:719-721.
29. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache or migraine?
Considerations in making a differential diagnosis.
Neurology. 2002;58(suppl 6):S10-S14.
30. Anthony M, Rasmussen BK. Migraine without aura,
Chapter 34. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch
KMA, eds.. The Headaches. New York: Raven Press;
1993, 255-262.
31. Schuller DE, Cadman TE, Jeffreys WH. Recurrence
headaches: what every allergist should know. Ann Al-lergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;76:219-230.
32. Olson CG, Vaughn TR, Ledoux RA. Food induced
migraine: Search for immunologic mechanisms. Ab-
stract. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;83:238.
33. Heatley RV, Denburg JA, Bayer N, Bienenstock J. In-
creased plasma histamine levels in migraine patients.
Clin Allergy. 1982;12:145-149.
34. Olness K, Hall G, Rozniecki JJ, Schmidt W, Theo-
harides TC. Mast cell activation in children with mi-
graine before and after training in self-regulation.
Headache. 1999;39:10110-10117.
35. Perini F, D’Andrea G, Galloni E, Pignatelli F, Billo
G, Alba S, et al. Plasma cytokine levels in migraineurs
and controls. Headache. 2005;45:926-931.
36. Krabbe AA, Olesen J. Headache provocation by con-
tinuous intravenous infusion of histamine. Clinical
results and receptor mechanisms. Pain. 1980;8:253-
259.
37. Mansfield LE. The role of antihistamine therapy
in vascular headaches. J Allergy Clin Immunol.1990;86:673-676.
38. Lewis DW, Diamond S, Scott D, Jones V. Pro-
phylactic treatment of pediatric migraine. Headache.2004;44:230-237.
39. Vaughn WT. Allergic migraine. JAMA. 1927;88:1383-
1386.
40. Unger AH, Unger L. Migraine is an allergic disease.
J Allergy. 1952;23:429-440.
41. Egger J, Carter CM, Wilson J, Turner MW, Soothill
JF. Is migraine food allergy? A double-blind
S18 June 2006
controlled trial of oligoantigenic diet treatment.
Lancet. 1983;2:865-869.
42. Mansfield LE, Vaughn TR, Waller WF. Food al-
lergy and adult migraine, double-blind and mediator
confirmation of an allergic etiology. Ann Allergy.1985;55:126-129.
43. Marteletti P. T cells expressing IL-2 receptor in mi-
graine. Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1991;13:448-456.
44. Mansfield LE, Ting S, Haverly RW, Yoo TJ. The
incidence and clinical implications of hypersensitiv-
ity to papain in an allergic population, confirmed by
blinded oral challenge. Ann Allergy. 1985;55:541-543.
45. Monro J, Brostoff J, Carini C, Zilkha K. Food allergy
in migraine. Study of dietary exclusion and RAST.
Lancet. 1980;2:1-4.
46. Monro J, Carini C, Brostoff J. Migraine is a food-
allergic disease. Lancet. 1984;2:719-721.
47. Paganelli R, Levinsky RJ, Brostoff J, Wraith DG. Im-
mune complexes containing food proteins in normal
and atopic subjects after oral challenge and effect of
sodium cromoglycate on antigen absorption. Lancet.1979;1:1270-1272.
48. Kawakami T, Kitaura J. Mast cell survival and activa-
tion by IgE in the absence of antigen: A consideration
of the biologic mechanisms and relevance. J Immunol.2005;175:4167-4173.
49. Theoharides TC, Spanos C, Pang X, Alferes L,
Ligris K, Letourneau R, et al. Stress-induced in-
tracranial mast cell degranulation: A corticotropin-
releasing hormone-mediated effect. Endocrinology.1995;136:5745-5750.
50. Rozniecki JJ, Dimitriadou V, Lambracht-Hall M,
Pang X, Theoharides TC. Morphological and func-
tional demonstration of rat dura mater mast cell-
neuron interactions in vitro and in vivo. Brain Res.1999;849:1-15.
51. Bolay H, Reuter U, Dunn AK, Huang Z, Boas
DA, Moskowitz MA. Intrinsic brain activity triggers
trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model.
Nat Med. 2002;8:136-142.
52. Reynier-Rebuffel AM, Callebert J, Dimitriadou V,
Mathiau P, Launay JM, Seylaz J, et al. Carbachol in-
duces granular cell exocytosis and serotonin release in
rabbit cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:R105-
R111.
53. Spanos C, el-Mansoury M, Letourneau R, Minogian-
nis P, Greenwood J, Siri P, et al. Carbachol-induced
bladder mast cell activation: Augmentation by estra-
diol and implications for interstitial cystitis. Urology.1996;48:809-816.
54. Theoharides TC. Mast cells and migraines. PerspectBiol Med. 1983:26:672-675.
55. Nelson HS. The atopic diseases. Ann Allergy.1985;55:441-447.
56. Headache Classification Committee of the Interna-
tional Headache Society. Classification of headache
disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cepha-lalgia. 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96.
57. Headache Classification Committee of the Interna-
tional Headache Society. The international classifi-
cation of headache disorders, 2nd ed. Cephalalgia2004;24(suppl 1):9-160.