4.4 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometric ...
Mass spectrometric analysis of selected radiolyzed amino acids in an astrochemical context
-
Upload
maria-elisa -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Mass spectrometric analysis of selected radiolyzed amino acids in an astrochemical context
Mass spectrometric analysis of selected radiolyzed amino acidsin an astrochemical context
Cristina Cherubini • Ornella Ursini •
Franco Cataldo • Susana Iglesias-Groth •
Maria Elisa Crestoni
Received: 18 November 2013 / Published online: 9 March 2014
� Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary 2014
Abstract A selection of amino acids, namely arginine,
proline and tyrosine previously irradiated to 3.2 mega-
Gray in the solid state and analyzed by differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical rotatory disper-
sion (ORD) were analyzed in the present work by mass
spectrometry with the purpose to identify the radiolysis
products and validate the results obtained previously with
DSC and ORD. The radiolysis of amino acids is a top-
down approach of a research program designed to assess
the radiolysis resistance of these molecules for 4.6 9 109
years once buried in primitive bodies of the Solar
System.
Keywords Amino acids � Radiolysis � Mass
spectrometry � Arginine � Proline � Tyrosine
Introduction
The current research on the solid state radiolysis of amino
acids has been inspired by the work of Urey [1–4] (Nobel
Laureate in 1934) who made an intriguing calculation
which is still valid today. The calculation shows that
organic molecules buried at a depth of[20 m in asteroids,
comets or other primitive bodies of the Solar System are
completely shielded from cosmic rays and are exposed
only to the high energy radiation derived from the decay of
the naturally occurring radionuclides present in the rocks
[2–5]. This implies that, for example, amino acids were
synthesized abiotically before the formation of the Solar
System. Afterwards they were incorporated in asteroids,
comets and large meteorites where they were degraded for
4.6 9 109 years (the age of the Solar System) only by the
radionuclide irradiation, assuming negligible water and
thermal processing inside these bodies.
In order to assess the radiolysis resistance of amino
acids and the preservation of chirality to high energy
radiation, Cataldo and colleagues [6–10] have started a
systematic study on the radiolysis of all proteinogenic
amino acids to a radiation dose of 3.2 mega-Gray (MGy),
which corresponds to 22.8 % of the total dose they should
have received inside asteroids, comets and other bodies of
the Solar System [6–10]. The results were extrapolated to
14 MGy of radiation dose showing that practically all the
proteinogenic amino acids can partially ‘‘survive’’ to such
an enormous dose with preservation of the enantiomeric
excess [10]. Since an important fraction of amino acid
species found in meteorites are non-proteinogenic [11],
Cataldo et al. [12, 13] have irradiated in the solid state to
3.2 MGy also a series of unusual amino acids belonging to
the classes found in carbonaceous chondrites. The con-
clusions were analogous to those made on proteinogenic
C. Cherubini � O. Ursini (&)
CNR-Istituto di Metodologie Chimiche, Area della Ricerca di
Montelibretti, Via Salaria Km 29.300, 00015 Monterotondo,
RM, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
F. Cataldo (&)
Actinium Chemical Research srl, Via Casilina 1626A,
00133 Rome, RM, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Iglesias-Groth
Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, Via Lactea snc, Tenerife,
Canary Islands, Spain
M. E. Crestoni
Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Universita
di Roma Sapienza, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, RM, Italy
123
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
DOI 10.1007/s10967-014-3078-1
amino acids: even the non-proteinogenic amino acids are
able to resist to a radiation dose equivalent to 4.6 9 109
years [12, 13].
Therefore, it is not a surprise that some scientists have
confirmed in recent times the presence of amino acids and
other molecules of biochemical interest inside carbona-
ceous chondrites [14–24]. According to certain theories,
these molecules are thought to be abiotically synthesized
before the Solar System formation, for example in the
interstellar medium and in the molecular clouds [25, 26].
Quite unexpected, they were found also in enantiomeric
excess [15–24]. The works of scientists like Bonner and
colleagues [27–31], Kminek and Bada [32] and other
recent works [14–24] have proved experimentally that the
radiolysis resistance of amino acids is accompanied also by
a preservation of the enantiomeric excess, although also the
phenomenon of radioracemization was detected.
In previous works the amino acids were irradiated
[12, 13], the solid state radiolysis causes the formation of
radiolytic products in the crystal structure of each amino
acid. Some of the radiolytic products have low molecular
weight and escape from the crystal by diffusion, while other
products remain trapped in the damaged crystal structure
together with the residual amount of not degraded amino
acid. The melting enthalpy per unit mass of a given organic
compound is a value dependent from the purity of such
compound. Hence, the formation of decomposition products
and the reduction of the amount of pristine molecules in the
crystal after the radiolysis leads inevitably to a reduction of
the melting enthalpy. The residual purity of a chemical
measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is
linked to the melting enthalpy value which is connected to
the cohesive energy of the molecular crystal. The presence
of foreign molecules in the knots of the crystalline structure
alter the melting enthalpy of the crystal. Furthermore, the
presence of foreign molecules (the radiolysis products) are
source of defects in the crystal of the type of Schottky and
Frenkel and this is another source of melting enthalpy
reduction. As a general rule the reduction of the melting
enthalpy is proportional to the amount of foreign molecules
present in the molecular crystal.
The ratio of the melting enthalpy after radiolysis over
the melting enthalpy before radiolysis gives an indication
of the amount of amino acid that ‘‘survived’’ the radiolysis.
The results of previous studies on amino acid radiolysis
obtained with DSC [6–10] are corroborated by the results
of a similar work where the radiolyzed amino acids were
analyzed by gas chromatography, GC [32]. Indeed, the
decomposition rate constant of certain proteinaceous amino
acids measured with DSC [6–10] are in reasonable agree-
ment with those determined by GC [32].
The effects of radiolysis on proteinaceous and non-
proteinaceous amino acids were previously measured also
by optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) spectrometry, a
polarimetric technique [6–10, 12, 13]. The measurement of
the optical activity by a polarimetric technique, is not a
measurement of pure radioracemization. It is instead a
measurement of the sum of the radioracemization and the
radiolysis of the amino acid. As shown by Bonner and
colleagues [27–31], the radioracemization of a chiral sub-
strate at high radiation dose is, after all, a secondary phe-
nomenon since the primary effect of high energy radiation
is the radiolysis, the degradation of the amino acid into
smaller and generally achiral molecular fragments. How-
ever, in the radiolytic process the radical fragments can
lead to possible formation of different products, some of
which keep a chiral centre.
In the present work we have investigated the irradiation
process of the L-amino acids (L-tyrosine, L-arginine and L-
proline) using the ESI–mass spectrometry (MS). The use of
a MS is important to complete the DSC and ORD data and
to identify the radiolysis products including those which are
able to keep a chiral centre. Moreover, it is possible to make
a quantitative analysis of irradiation products and to deter-
mine the amount of the D-enantiomer formed by radiation.
Experimental
Materials and equipment
The amino acids L-tyrosine, L-arginine and L-proline were
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and used as
received. The DSC analysis of the amino acids before and
after irradiation was made on a DSC-1 Star System from
Mettler-Toledo. The ORD spectra were obtained on a Jasco
P-2000 spectropolarimeter with a dedicated monochromator.
The chemical structure of reaction products and the
quantitative analysis were performed by MS analysis using
a Finnigan LXQ linear ion trap system equipped with a ESI
ion source. We used the ESI source in either positive or
negative ion polarity mode in order to have the most
complete recognition of products. Operating as MSn scan
mode (n = 1–5) where n is the scan power and where each
stage of mass analysis includes an ion selection step, we
have acquired the maximum structural information about
the single amino acid analyzed.
The HPLC analysis was made using a Shimadzu liquid
chromatograph LC-10AD VP equipped with a chiral
column.
Irradiation procedure with c rays
The irradiation with c rays was made as already detailed in
the previous works [6–10, 12, 13].
1062 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
Analysis with DSC and ORD
The irradiated samples were tested for purity by a DSC as
already reported previously [6–10, 12, 13]. The amount %
of residual sample after the solid state radiolysis Nc was
determined from the ratio of the melting enthalpy after the
radiolysis at 3.2 MGy (DHc) and the enthalpy before
radiolysis measured on the pristine sample (DH0):
Nc ð%Þ ¼ 100 DHc=DH0
� �: ð1Þ
Similarly, as already reported previously [6–10, 12, 13]
the ORD was determined from the ratio of the average
specific optical rotation after radiolysis [a]c and before
radiolysis [a]0 the residual optical activity Rc was
determined:
Rc ð%Þ ¼ 100 ½a�c=½a�0n o
: ð2Þ
Mass spectrometric analysis of pristine and radiolyzed
L-arginine, L-proline and L-tyrosine
Each amino acid under study (L-tyrosine = 2.33 mg,
L-arginine hydrochloride = 2.59 mg, L-proline = 2.83 mg)
was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol and 1 mL of ammonium
acetate solution 45 mM.
In order to obtain a more direct comparison between the
pristine and the irradiated samples, we used the same
weight for both of them.
The solutions of amino acids were directly injected
in the ESI source with a syringe pump at a flow rate of
10 lL/min. The acquisition time of every spectra was of
0.3 min. The MS of the irradiated amino acid was com-
pared with that of the pristine amino acid, with the aim of
identifying new irradiation products.
The ionization process was accomplished in ESI source
in positive and negative ion polarity mode, in order to
determine the products deriving from the irradiation. In
fact, the products that retain the acidic groups were better
detectable in negative mode while the products that retain
the basic groups were detectable in positive mode.
In the ion trap analyzer, each new product derived from
the irradiation process was firstly isolated as specific
m/z family ions and then fragmented by collision induced
dissociation (CID) process [33]. The CID process allows
the fragmentation of a selected ion applying a specific
resonance excitation voltage that enhances the ion motion.
As a result, the ions with the same m/z value gain kinetic
energy and through no-reactive collisions with helium
damping gas present in the mass analyzer, they dissociate
to form product ions. This sequential process can be used
again to isolate one of the ion produced by the first CID
process and subject to further collisions (MSn). The frag-
mentation pathway has allowed the determination of the
ion structure and the identification of the chemical nature
of the products.
Coupling ESI–MS with a HPLC equipped by a chiral col-
umn (teicoplanine based stainless steel column,
150 mm 9 4.6 mm) allows us to measure the amount of
D-enantiomer formed by irradiation process [34]. The mobile
phase was 90 % methanol and 10 % ammonium acetate
solution 45 mM.
Results and discussion
To go further insight the radiation chemistry of the radio-
lyzed amino acids at 3.2 MGy, we have selected three
amino acids (L-arginine, L-proline and L-tyrosine) which
were previously studied with DSC and ORD and which
were analyzed by MS. The purpose was the qualitative and
quantitative identification of the radiolytic products,
establishing the amount of the pristine amino acid that
‘‘survived’’ the irradiation process. In particular a special
effort is devoted to elucidate the chemical structure of
radiolytic products, using the possibility to operate in MSn
mode.
The ESI–(MS)n analyses and the possibility to couple
the ESI–ion trap MS with a HPLC instrument equipped
with a suitable chiral column has offered us the possibility
to understand the chemical nature of radiolytic products,
establishing which products lost the chiral centre and
which one was able to keep it. The use of a chiral column it
is also important to determine the radioracemization level
of the residual amino acid, that is to establish the right
amount of D enantiomers formed by the action of c rays
from the starting L-amino acids.
All these factors are key elements useful to understand
the chemical reasons responsible of the difference between
the two values: the amount of residual sample ‘‘survived’’
after the radiolysis (Nc) and residual optical activity (Rc)
studied in our previous investigation [6–10, 12, 13].
Mass spectrometric analysis of pristine and irradiated
arginine
The structure of arginine is reported in Fig. 1.
NH2 NH
NH
NH2
OH
O
Fig. 1 Chemical structure of arginine
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1063
123
Fig. 2 Mass spectrum of irradiated arginine: positive ion mode. The blue rectangles mark the ions detected in pristine sample. The red
rectangles mark the new ions derived from irradiation products. (Color figure online)
CH2
NH2
OH
O
Fig. 3 Structure of allyl glycine
NH2 NH
NH
NH2
Fig. 4 Structure of 1-(4-aminobutyl)-guanidine, neutral of ion
m/z 131
1064 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
NH2 NH
NH
OH
O
NH
NH2
OH
O
NH
I II
Fig. 5 Neutral structures of ion m/z 160. The structure I derived from deamination process on the chiral centre. The structure II is the neutral
product due to the deamination process on the guanidine terminal group
Fig. 6 Fragmentation spectrum of the ion m/z 160
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1065
123
The DSC analysis of pristine and irradiated arginine at 3.2
MGy suggested a high chemical decomposition (Nc = 56.6)
after arginine irradiation [6–10, 12, 13]. However, the residual
optical activity of the irradiated arginine appeared less altered
by radiation according to the ORD measurements since
Rc = 75.3 [6–10, 12, 13]. This difference between the
chemical decomposition value and the higher ORD data could
be rationalized with the formation of radiolytic products that
are able to conserve a chiral centre. The MS of irradiated
arginine in positive ion mode is reported in Fig. 2.
In the spectrum we marked with blue rectangles all
those ions that were already detected in pristine sample.
These ions are:
– ion m/z 175: protonated arginine,
– ion m/z 349: proton bound dimer,
– ion m/z 523: arginine trimer.
NH3+
NH
NH
OH
O
NH
NH3+
OH
O
NH
NH
NH
OH
O
CH2+
OH
O
NH OH
O
NH
CH3
NH3+
OH
O
Structures of ion m/z 160
- guanidine
ion m/z 101
-NH3ion m/z 143
- HN=C=NH
ion m/z 118
+
+
Fig. 7 Fragmentation scheme of ion m/z 160 and plausible products structures
Table 1 Relative percentages
of products formed by arginine
radiolysis
Ions Relative %
Arginine 60.3
116 1.2
131 1.3
160 35.4
319 0.8
334 1.0
NH
OH
OFig. 8 Chemical structure of
proline
1066 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
The ions corresponding to the radiolytic products are
marked by red rectangles and they are the ions m/z 116,
m/z 131, m/z 160, m/z 319 and m/z 334.
Through the MSn analysis the ion m/z 116 was identi-
fied as protonated allyl glycine, that is formed by the
detachment of terminal guanidine induced by irradiation
process.
The allyl glycine (Fig. 3) maintains the a chiral centre
and could be partially responsible of the observed optical
activity retention.
The ion m/z 131 is identified as protonated 1-(4-amin-
obutyl)-guanidine (Fig. 4), formed through the decarbox-
ylation process.
The ion m/z 160 could be represented as the protonated
ion of by two possible structures, shown in Fig. 5, both
derived from deamination processes induced by radiolysis.
The structure on the left of Fig. 5 represents the loss of aamine group of the amino acid, while the structure on the
right of Fig. 5 is obtained removing the amine group from
the guanidine site.
Fig. 9 Proline mass spectrum in positive ion mode. The spectrum mass range is from m/z 50 to m/z 400. The blue rectangles mark the ions
detected in pristine sample. The red rectangles mark the new ions derived from irradiation products. (Color figure online)
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1067
123
It should be noted that only the second structure main-
tains the chiral centre.
The fragmentation spectrum (Fig. 6) of the ion m/z 160
confirms the presence of both structures.
Although the loss of ammonia can be justified by both
structures, through MS2 analysis we detected the fragment
m/z 101 due to the loss of a guanidine molecule. This
fragmentation pathway can be only explained with the
presence of the structure I of Fig. 5. On the other hand, the
presence of ion m/z 118, that derives from the loss of
carbodiimide as neutral molecules, could be only ratio-
nalized starting from structure II of Fig. 5.
The fragmentation scheme of the ion m/z 160 is reported
in Fig. 7.
In the Table 1 are reported the relative percentages of
products formed by irradiation process. It is necessary to
mention that these values are calculated on the basis of the
relative abundance of the corresponding mass spectromet-
ric peaks. The amount of arginine ‘‘survived’’ the radiation
dose of 3.2 MGy is 60.3 % as measured by MS, in good
agreement with Nc = 56.6 measured by DSC and sug-
gesting that 56.6 % of arginine was recovered unchanged
after the irradiation. This result is a confirmation of the
validity of the DSC analysis as a rapid method for the
estimation of the purity of compounds.
Due to their low intensities, it was not possible to isolate
the ions m/z 319 and m/z 334. However, they seem to be
proton bound dimer derived from ionization process. The
first one is the proton bound dimer of the ion m/z 160 with
an arginine molecule, while the second one is the proton
bound dimer of the ion m/z 160.
The mass spectrometric analyses allow us to under-
stand the difference between the DSC and ORD data,
previously obtained. In fact, through the ESI–MSn stud-
ies we have identified the chemical structure of two
optically active irradiation products, the allyl glycine
corresponding to the ion m/z 116 and the radiolytic
product corresponding to the structure II of the ion
m/z 160 (Fig. 5).
The estimated relative percentages of these two ions,
could offset the difference between the chemical decom-
position and the optical residual activity values.
Mass spectrometric analysis of pristine and irradiated
proline
Proline with its cyclic structure (Fig. 8) is different from
the other amino acids analyzed, and this difference is dis-
closed by the absence of radiation-induced deamination
process.
The amino group is protected by the cyclic structure and
the high energy radiation essentially causes a cleavage of
the cyclic structure. The positive ion mode MS of proline is
shown in Fig. 9.
The blue rectangles indicate the ions already present
in the MS of pristine amino acid, while the red rectangles
mark the ions corresponding to the radiolysis products.
The ions present in the MS of pristine proline are the
m/z 116 [proline–H?] and the m/z 138 [proline–Na?]
adduct.
The MSn analysis helped us to figure out the structure of
some new ions present in the irradiated sample. The ion
m/z 118 is identified as protonated 5-aminopropionic acid,
formed by the opening of the cyclic structure of proline
induced by irradiation.
By irradiation, it is possible to have some fragmentation
process of proline skeleton. The resulting radical species
could react each other or/and react with the neutral mole-
cules leading to the formation of products that generally
have a larger molecular mass than the starting proline. Two
of these products can be the ion m/z 185 and the ion m/
z 199 that are shown in Fig. 10.
Furthermore, the same radicals could generate smaller
molecules through simple rearrangement processes. In fact,
from the MS obtained operating within a mass range from
15 to 200 m/z (Fig. 11) it is possible to observe the
NH
NH2
O
OH
NH
OH
NOH
O
NH2 OH
O
a
b c
Fig. 10 Possible structure of the neutral species corresponding to the
ions m/z 118 (a), m/z 185 (b) and m/z 199 (c)
1068 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
presence of two additional radiolysis products: the ions
m/z 72 and m/z 100.
The ion m/z 72 corresponds to the decarboxylation
product, while the ion m/z 70 corresponds to the product
formed by the loss of formic acid due the ESI ionization
Fig. 11 Proline positive ion mode mass spectrum at low mass range. The blue rectangles mark the ions detected in pristine sample. The red
rectangles mark the new ions derived from irradiation products. (Color figure online)
NH
H
OFig. 12 Neutral structure of ion
m/z 100, pyrrolidine-2-
carbaldehyde
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1069
123
process. Even the ion m/z 100 represents a new ion and its
hypothetical neutral structure is shown in the Fig. 12.
In the Table 2 are reported the relative percentage of
products formed by irradiation process as determined by
the mass spectrometric analysis.
The sum of the relative percentages of the radiation
products is in good agreement with the result obtained by
DSC method (Nc = 83.5).
Furthermore, the presence of some optical active ions,
such as the ions m/z 100, m/z 185 and m/z 199, could justify
the value of Rc (Rc = 86.8) higher than the Nc value.
The chiral HPLC–ESI–MS analysis allowed us to sep-
arate the L and D enantiomers. In order to determinate the
retention time of the enantiomers we used the L and
D proline in the optical pure form. The retention time of
L-proline is 2.85 min, while the retention time of D-proline
is 4.56 min. Analyzing the irradiated proline, we observe
the presence of both enantiomers.
The amount of D-proline, formed by radiation process, is
4.8 % respect to the L-enantiomer. The presence of the
D-enantiomer should affect negatively the Rc value (should
lower the Rc). However, the presence of other chiral pro-
ducts formed after irradiation and detected by MS, com-
pensates the effects of the D-enantiomer on Rc and justify
the difference between the Nc and Rc values.
Mass spectrometric analysis of pristine and irradiated
tyrosine
The structure of tyrosine is reported in Fig. 13.
The MS of irradiated tyrosine in positive ion mode is
reported in Fig. 14.
From the spectrum it is possible to observe the presence
of ions already detected in pristine sample (marked by blue
rectangle), such as
– ion m/z 182: protonated tyrosine,
– ion m/z 136: loss of formic acid due to the ionization
process,
– ion m/z 165: loss of ammonia due to the ionization
process,
– ion m/z 204: Na? adduct,
– ion m/z 363: proton bound dimer,
– ion m/z 385: sodium bound dimer.
The radiolysis products correspond to the ions m/z 138
and m/z 121, marked by a red rectangle. Both these com-
pounds derive from amino acid decarboxylation process.
The 2-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanamine is the compound
formed by the direct decarboxylation process (CO2 loss)
and corresponds at the ion m/z 138, while the m/z 121 ion
derives from the m/z 138 ion after loss of ammonia due to
ESI ionization process (Fig. 15).
Moreover, in negative ion mode, it is possible to observe
the ion m/z 165 derived from the radiolytic deamination of
tyrosine, which corresponds to the neutral product 3-(p-
hydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid (Fig. 16).
The DSC and ORD data, show that the tyrosine pos-
sesses an high level of radiolysis resistance (Nc = 92.1)
with a good residual optical rotation (Rc = 98.9). In first
instance, this slight difference between these two value
could be rationalized with a hypothetic formation of
radiolytic products that keep the chiral centre of the amino
acid. The results of mass spectrometric analysis do not
validate this preliminary hypothesis, because the products
that derive from the decarboxylation and deamination
processes have lost the chiral centre. Hence, they cannot be
responsible of the difference between the residual per-
centage of pristine amino acid and the residual percentage
of its optical activity.
In the Table 3 are reported the relative percentage of the
products formed by the irradiation process.
In the case of tyrosine, the radiolysis resistance
assessed by MS has shown that 97.8 % ‘‘survived’’ the
radiation dose of 3.2 MGy. This result is in closer
agreement with the Rc = 98.9 measured with ORD rather
than with the Nc = 92.1 value measured with DSC.
However the standard deviation in the repeatability of
Table 2 Relative percentages
of products formed from proline
radiolysis
Ions Relative %
Residual proline 83.07
72 1.97
100 1.73
118 4.77
185 2.27
199 1.15
206 2.22
277 1.76
300 1.06
OHNH2
OH
O
Fig. 13 Chemical structure of tyrosine
1070 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
the DSC analysis is typical 1.1–1.5 but could be higher
in the worse cases [13]. Considering a 3r, then
Nc = 92.1 ± 4.5 which means that within the variability
of the DSC analysis the Nc value found for tyrosine is in
reasonable agreement with the mass spectrometric ana-
lysis result.
Fig. 14 Mass spectrum of irradiated tyrosine in positive ion mode. The blue rectangles mark the ions detected in pristine sample. The red
rectangles mark the new ions derived from irradiation products. (Color figure online)
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1071
123
Conclusions
The mass spectrometric analysis of 3.2 MGy irradiated
arginine has revealed that 60.3 % of it ‘‘survived’’ the
massive radiation dose administered. The result obtained
by MS is in agreement and validates the residual amount of
arginine as measured by DSC: Nc = 56.6 %. The analysis
of the radiolysis products of arginine has permitted the
identification of an optical active product which can justify
the fact that Rc = 75.3. The higher residual optical activity
of arginine in comparison to its purity as measured by DSC
is fully justified by the formation of optically active radi-
olysis products.
The mass spectrometric analysis of 3.2 MGy irradiated
proline has revealed that the amount of proline remained
after radiolysis is 83.07 % in good agreement with the DSC
analysis which has given an Nc = 83.5. The slight higher
value of Rc = 86.8 is justified by the detection of optically
active compounds among the radiolysis products. Further-
more, it was possible to quantify the degree of radiorace-
mization of the residual proline: the D-enantiomer was
found to be 4.8 % the amount of the residual L-enantiomer.
The mass spectrometric analysis of 3.2 MGy irradiated
tyrosine has shown that 97.8 % of it resisted to radiolytic
degradation. The result is in reasonable agreement both
with Nc = 92.1 ± 4.5 and even more with Rc = 98.9. The
last value combined with the identification of two achiral
radiolysis products suggests a negligible radioracemization
level for tyrosine.
The mass spectrometric analysis of three selected amino
acids has corroborated the validity of the DSC analysis for
the study of the radiolysis resistance of a series of pro-
teinaceous and non-proteinaceous amino acids. The DSC
analysis is very rapid and permits a quick estimation of the
radiolysis resistance of the amino acids but of course has
also limitations due to the variable repeatability. None-
theless it is thanks to the DSC analysis that it was possible
for the first time to monitor the radiolysis stability at 3.2
MGy of all the proteinogenic amino acids as well as a
selection of non-proteinogenic amino acids [6–10, 12, 13].
Thanks to the mass spectrometric analysis performed on
the selected amino acids in the present work, also the ORD
analysis was rationalized in terms of radioracemization
products (wherever possible) and in terms of chiral and
achiral radiolysis fragments identification.
Acknowledgments We wish to thank Professor G. Angelini for
helpful and lively discussion of the results.
References
1. Miller SL, Oro J (1981) J Mol Evol 17:263
2. Urey HC (1952) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 38:351
3. Urey HC (1955) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 41:127
4. Urey HC (1956) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42:889
5. Kohman TP (1997) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 219:165
6. Cataldo F, Ursini O, Angelini G, Iglesias-Groth S, Manchado A
(2011) Rend Fis Acc Lincei 22:81
7. Cataldo F, Angelini G, Iglesias-Groth S, Manchado A (2010)
Radiat Phys Chem 80:57
8. Cataldo F, Ragni P, Iglesias-Groth S, Manchado A (2010) J
Radioanal Nucl Chem 287:573
9. Cataldo F, Ragni P, Iglesias-Groth S, Manchado A (2010) J
Radioanal Nucl Chem 287:903
10. Iglesias-Groth S, Cataldo F, Ursini O, Manchado A (2011) Mon
Not R Astron Soc 210:1447
11. Burton AS, Stern JC, Elsila JE, Glavin DP, Dworkin JP (2012)
Chem Soc Rev 41:5459
12. Cataldo F, Angelini G, Hafez Y, Iglesias-Groth S (2012) J Ra-
dioanal Nucl Chem 295:1235
13. Cataldo F, Angelini G, Hafez Y, Iglesias-Groth S (2013) Life
3:449
OH
NH2
OH
CH2+
a b
Fig. 15 Neutral structure of the
ion m/z 138 (a) and the
corresponding ammonia loss
ion (b)
OH
OH
O
Fig. 16 Neutral product 3-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid of
the ion m/z 165
Table 3 Relative percentages of products formed from tyrosine
radiolysis
Products Relative %
Tyrosine 97.81
2-(p-Hydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanamine 1.97
3-(p-Hydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid 0.22
1072 J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073
123
14. Anders E (1991) Space Sci Rev 56:157
15. Sephton MA (2002) Nat Prod Rep 19:292
16. Cronin JR, Pizzarello S (2000) In: Goodfriend GA, Collins MJ,
Fogel ML, Macko SA, Wehmiller JF (eds) Chap 2, perspective in
amino acid and protein geochemistry. Oxford University Press,
Oxford
17. Pizzarello S, Cronin JR (2000) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:329
18. Pizzarello S, Huang Y, Alexandre MR (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 105:3700
19. Meierhenrich UJ (2008) Amino acids and the asymmetry of life.
Springer, Berlin
20. Martins Z, Sephton MA (2009) In: Hughes AW (ed) Chapter 1,
amino acids, peptides and proteins in organic chemistry. Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim
21. Pizzarello S, Groy TL (2011) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:645
22. Pizzarello S, Schrader DL, Monroe AA, Lauretta DS (2012) Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 109:11949
23. Martins Z, Alexander CMO, Orzechowska GE, Fogel MI, Eh-
renfreund P (2007) Meteorit Planet Sci 42:2125
24. Pizzarello S, Shock E (2010) Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol
2:a00210
25. Kwok S (2009) Astrophys Space Sci 319:5
26. Kwok S (2012) Organic matter in the universe. Wiley, Weinheim
27. Bonner W, Lemmon RM (1978) J Mol Evol 11:95
28. Bonner W, Lemmon RM (1987) Bioorg Chem 7:175
29. Bonner WA, Blair NE, Lemmon RM (1979) Origins Life Evol
Biosph 9:279
30. Bonner W, Liang Y (1984) J Mol Evol 21:84
31. Bonner WA (1999) Radiat Res 152:83
32. Kminek G, Bada JL (2006) Earth Planet Sci Lett 245:1
33. Jennings KR (2000) Int J Mass Spectrom 200:479
34. Berthold A, Liu Y, Bagwill C, Armstrong DW (1996) J Chro-
matogr A 731:123
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 300:1061–1073 1073
123