Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association
description
Transcript of Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association
![Page 1: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association
November 20, 2013
![Page 2: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Transit Development and Delivery
2
![Page 3: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
New StartsManagement Structure
• MTA Office of Transit Development and Delivery– Executive Direction and Control– Legal – Real Estate
• Program Management Consultant per Project• General Engineering Consultant per Project• Financial and Insurance Advisor• Economic Empowerment Program Team
3
![Page 4: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Economic Empowerment Program
• Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program– Not M/WBE– Goals set at/for each phase of project – Piloting new USDOT bonding initiative
• Small Business Enterprise– First major project for MDOT
• Targeted Worker Hiring Goal– Economically- and socially-disadvantaged persons– Veterans
• Workforce Development Programs– Targeted to top “in-demand” trades
4
![Page 5: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Project Delivery Methods
![Page 6: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Deliberate Project Delivery Analysis
• Comparison of Delivery Methods Relative to:– Project goals– Technical and financial risks– State and federal legal requirements– Availability/timing of State and Federal funds– Integration with existing operations
• Value for Money • Organizational and Marketplace Capacity• Peer Review and Industry Forum
![Page 7: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
![Page 8: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Maryland National Capital Purple Line
Improved Connectivity to Major Activity Centers
– Links 4 branches of the Metro – Connects to all three MARC
lines and Amtrak– Connects to regional and local
bus services
$2.2B Capital Cost
69,000 Daily Riders
8
![Page 9: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Purple Line Characteristics
• Fully Grade-Separated Running Way from Bethesda to Silver Spring
• In-Street Running in Median, Separate Right-of-Way• In-Street Running, Mixed Traffic at 3 Locations• Aerial Structures Over Railroads, Silver Spring Transit
Center and MD 450• Two Maintenance Facilities, Yard and Shop• Includes Capital Crescent Trail and Bethesda Metro
South Entrance projects
9
![Page 10: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why P3 for Purple Line?
• Self-Contained from Existing MTA Operations
• Appropriate Size for Concessionaires to Bid
• Enough Complexity for Innovation
• Reasonable Risk Allocation
• Good Value for Money
![Page 11: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MTA will Retain Primary Responsibility for Certain Project Elements
• Public Information, Communications and Involvement
• General Terms of Third-Party Agreements
• Right-of-Way Acquisition
• Fare Policy and Ridership
• Policing and Security
• Transit Oriented Development
11
![Page 12: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
P3 Structure
• Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain• Approximately a 30-year O&M term with handback
• Performance Based Technical Provisions• Reference drawings and Basis of Design Report
• Life Cycle Cost Considerations• Responsible for operations, maintenance, replacement
• Capture Innovation and Cost/Schedule Savings• Milestone Payments During Construction• Availability Payments
• O&M costs• Capital debt• Financing cost• Profit/Risk coverage• Performance
![Page 13: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
P3 Solicitation/Selection Schedule
13
Milestone Target Date
Pre-Solicitation Report Published July 31, 2013
BPW Approval of P-3 Designation November 6, 2013
Request for Qualifications Issued November 8, 2013
Statements of Qualifications Due December 10, 2013
Short List Announced and Draft RFP Issued Early January 2013
Final Request for Proposals Issued*(*Alternative technical concept dates TBA)
Late April 2014
Proposals Due August 2014
Preferred Bidder September 2014
Commercial Close October 2014
Financial Close April 2015
![Page 14: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
![Page 15: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Project Alignment
![Page 16: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Project Description
• Stations: 19– 14 surface, 5 with parking; 5 underground
• Capital Cost: $2.6+ Billion (Year of Expenditure Dollars)• Average Daily Ridership (2035): 54,520• Connections to:
– MARC commuter rail at two stations– Central Light Rail (Blue Line) at Lombard Street– Metro (short walk) at Charles Center
• Frequency of Service: 10-Minute Peak at Opening, 7-Minute Peak by 2035
![Page 17: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Advance & Associated Contracts ($85M)
By MTA…60” Water Main at MLK/FremontOff-Site Stormwater ManagementReforestation
By others…Edmondson Avenue Bridge Reconstruction (City)Utility Relocation and Supply (Comcast, Verizon, BGE, etc.)Brewer’s Hill/Canton Crossing Road Improvements (City)
![Page 18: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Contract Package Plan ($1.9B)
Civil, Bridge and Utilities Contract’s by Geography (5)Downtown Tunnel, Utilities and Station BoxesCooks Lane TunnelSurface Station Finishes (Canopy, Architecture, Landscaping, ADA, Signage, etc.)Underground Station Fit-Out, Finish and Surface Restoration (2)Trackwork, Systems and Signals*Elevator and Escalator Operations and Maintenance Facility*Vehicles*Fare Collection
* P3 under consideration
![Page 19: Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062814/5681689e550346895ddf313a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19