Municipal Liability for Police Misconduct: Rymer v. Davis ...
Maryland Health Care Commission · 2020. 8. 3. · Martha G. Rymer, CPA Rymer & Associates, PA...
Transcript of Maryland Health Care Commission · 2020. 8. 3. · Martha G. Rymer, CPA Rymer & Associates, PA...
Analyze
Empower Inform Engage
Educate
Collaborate
Lead
Plan
Research
Maryland Health Care
Commission
2019 Annual Report
Andrew N. Pollak, MD, Chairman
Ben Steffen, Executive Director July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019
i
Andrew N. Pollak, MD, Chairman Professor and Chair, Department of Orthopaedics
University of Maryland School of Medicine Chief of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Medical System
Arun Bhandari, MD Chesapeake Oncology Hematology Associates, PA
Cassandra Boyer Business Operations Manager Enterprise Information Systems Directorate US Army Communications Electronics Command
Marcia Boyle Founder Immune Deficiency Foundation
Martin L. “Chip” Doordan, MHA Retired Chief Executive Officer Anne Arundel Medical Center
Jason C. McCarthy, PharmD Pharmacist in Private Practice
Jeffrey Metz, MBA, LNHA President and Administrator Egle Nursing and Rehab Center
Gerard S. O’Connor, MD General Surgeon in Private Practice
Michael J. O’Grady, PhD Principal, Health Policy LLC Senior Fellow, National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago
Martha G. Rymer, CPA Rymer & Associates, PA
Randolph S. Sergent, Esq. Vice Chair, Maryland Health Care Commission Vice President and Deputy General Counsel CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
Stephen B. Thomas, PhD Professor of Health Services Administration School of Public Health Director, Maryland Center for Health Equity University of Maryland, College Park
Marcus L. Wang, Esq. Co-Founder, President and General Manager ZytoGen Global Genetics Institute
ii
Executive Summary
This annual report to the Governor describes the activities and accomplishments of the Maryland Health
Care Commission (MHCC or the Commission) during fiscal year 2019.
In 2019, MHCC reached key milestones in the following strategic areas:
1. Development of The Maryland Health Care Commission 2019-2022 Strategic Report
2. Report on Health System Quality and Cost
• Completed 2018 Healthcare-Associated Infection public reporting initiative.
• Collaborated with The Leapfrog Group to enable publication of patient safety ratings for
Maryland hospitals.
• Implemented a statewide marketing campaign on the Quality Reports website.
• Completed the 2018 Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Survey.
• Completed the 2018-2019 Nursing Home and Assisted Living Employee Influenza
Vaccination Surveys.
• Enhanced collaboration with the hospice industry by distributing performance reports
from the annual Maryland Hospice Survey to the hospice providers.
• Reduced All-Payer Claims Database data submission errors and reduced review time.
3. Health Facilities Planning and Certificate of Need
• Initiated a new phase of Certificate of Need (CON) modernization to align CON regulation
with Maryland’s Total Cost of Care Model.
• Supported the passage of legislation key to implementing previously recommended CON
reforms.
• Completed final action on 17 CON applications and five exemptions from CON review,
including conversion of two general hospitals to freestanding medical facilities.
4. Expanding Adoption of Information Technology in Health Care
• Assessed statewide progress of electronic health records, use of health information
exchanges, and adoption of telehealth.
• Registered health information exchanges that meet the revised definition in Maryland law.
• Provided privacy and security policy oversight to CRISP, the State-Designated Health
Information Exchange.
• Organized a health care facility cybersecurity readiness and risk management symposium.
• Convened the Maryland Primary Care Council.
• Established a Care Management Focus Group to address policy challenges and identify
best practices for advancing care management in ambulatory practices.
• Provided practice transformation support to 800 providers participating in the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services Practice Transformation Network.
5. Support Statewide Initiatives
• Provided analytical support and information from the Medical Care Data Base for
assessing the impact of the Maryland All-Payer and Total Cost of Care Models.
• Released annual report to the Maryland General Assembly on the status of the Trauma
Fund.
iii
Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... ii
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
Section 1: 2019 MHCC Activities and Accomplishments ................................................................................. 2
The Maryland Health Care Commission 2019-2022 Strategic Report ........................................................ 2
Health System Quality and Cost Transparency ........................................................................................... 3
2019 Milestones ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Public Reporting/Transparency Initiatives .............................................................................................. 4
Expanding the Usability of Maryland’s APCD ......................................................................................... 7
Looking Ahead ....................................................................................................................................... 11
Health Facilities Planning and Certificate of Need .................................................................................... 12
2019 Milestones .................................................................................................................................... 13
Modernizing Health Planning and Certificate of Need Regulation ...................................................... 13
State Health Plan Updates .................................................................................................................... 14
Key Capacity Planning Decisions ........................................................................................................... 14
Looking Ahead ....................................................................................................................................... 15
Expanding Adoption of Information Technology in Health Care .............................................................. 15
2019 Milestones .................................................................................................................................... 16
Statewide Progress on EHR Diffusion, Use of HIE, and Adoption of Telehealth .................................. 16
Key Initiatives to Expand Health Information Technology ................................................................... 17
Cybersecurity ......................................................................................................................................... 18
Oversight of CRISP, the State-Designated HIE ...................................................................................... 18
Looking Ahead ....................................................................................................................................... 18
Supporting Statewide Initiatives ............................................................................................................... 19
2019 Milestones .................................................................................................................................... 19
Evolving the Maryland Health Model ................................................................................................... 19
The Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund: .................................................................................. 20
Looking Ahead ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Responding to Legislative Directives ......................................................................................................... 21
iv
Section 2: MHCC Organization, Operations, and Budget .............................................................................. 22
MHCC Organization ................................................................................................................................... 22
The Center for Analysis and Information Systems (CAIS) ..................................................................... 22
The Center for Quality Measurement and Reporting .......................................................................... 22
The Center for Health Care Facilities Planning and Development ....................................................... 23
The Center for Health Information Technology and Innovative Care Delivery .................................... 23
Spending .................................................................................................................................................... 23
Appendix A: Governance ............................................................................................................................... 24
Selection Process and Geographic Representation of Commissioners .................................................... 24
Commissioner Biographies ........................................................................................................................ 24
Appendix B: Tables of Certificates of Need Reviewed, Approved, or Changed in FY 2019 .......................... 29
Appendix C: Brief Descriptions of Short-Term Legislative Directed Projects Active in Fiscal Year 2019 ...... 34
v
List of Tables Table 1: Average Charge per Case for Selected High Case Volume Hospitals for Selected APR-DRGs
Calendar Year 2018 .......................................................................................................................................... 5
Table 2: Nursing Home and Assisted Living Employee Influenza Vaccinations, 2018–2019 .......................... 6
Table 3: Summary of Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Domain Scores—2018 Statewide Results .. 7
Table 4: EHR Adoption in Maryland by Care Setting ..................................................................................... 16
Table 5: Legislative Workgroups active in 2019 ............................................................................................ 21
Table 6: Certificate of Need Applications Reviewed in FY 2019.................................................................... 29
Table 7: Exceptions from Certificate of Need Review Completed in FY 2019 .............................................. 31
Table 8: Changes to Approved Certificates of Need Reviewed in FY 2019 ................................................... 32
Table 9: Certificates of Ongoing Performance for Cardiac Surgery in FY 2019 ............................................ 33
List of Figures Figure 1: Timeliness of Data Submissions Improved in 2019 (Percent of Payers Medical Care Data Base
Submission Status 1 month after Submission Deadline) ................................................................................. 8
Figure 2: Annual Spending and Risk among the Privately Insured for 2015–2017 ......................................... 9
Figure 3: Privately Insured Annual Per-Member Spending by Service Category, 2017 ................................ 10
Figure 4: Privately Insured Mental Health and Substance Abuse Annual Spending Per Member, Cumulative
Trends from 2013 to 2017, Medical Only ...................................................................................................... 11
Figure 5: Maryland Health Care Commission Organizational Chart ..............................................................24
1
Introduction
This report contains a summary of the fiscal year 2019 activities of the Maryland Health Care
Commission (MHCC or the Commission). MHCC is an independent regulatory agency whose
mission is to plan for health system needs, promote informed decision-making, increase
accountability, and improve access in a rapidly changing health care environment. MHCC is
governed by 15 Commissioners appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the
Senate. Dr. Andrew Pollak was appointed Chairman of the MHCC by Governor Larry Hogan in
February 2019. Randolph Sergent serves as Vice Chairman.
To achieve this mission, MHCC provides timely and accurate information on availability, cost, and
quality of services to policymakers, purchasers, providers, and the public. The Commission’s
vision for Maryland is to ensure that informed consumers hold the health care system
accountable and have access to affordable and appropriate health care services through
innovative programs.
The MHCC is legislatively mandated to carry out the following activities for the State of Maryland:
• Report on health system quality and cost
• Plan for and maintain the availability and financial viability of health care facilities and services
• Reduce the costs of health care through wider adoption of information technology
• Promote health care delivery system reform
• Develop an all-payer database to monitor cost, quality, and population health
• Monitor health care expenditures
• Protect safety-net providers
• Monitor health disparities
When directed by the General Assembly, MHCC conducts health policy studies of importance to the
General Assembly, monitors Maryland’s health care workforce, and serves as a technical resource to the
Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) for the All-Payer Model and Total Cost of Care (TCOC)
Demonstration.
The Commission’s Strategic Plan for calendar years 2019 through 2022 focuses on five priorities:
communications, health care cost and quality information, Certificate of Need modernization, supporting
the adoption of value-based payment models, and encouraging the use of telehealth. MHCC also
recognizes the importance of addressing social determinants of health and health disparities on health
outcomes and wellbeing in Maryland.
The first section of this report covers MHCC activities and accomplishments in fiscal year 2019. The
second section addresses MHCC operations, including organization, staffing, and budget.
Mission
Vision
2
Section 1: 2019 MHCC Activities and Accomplishments
This section focuses on MHCC’s activities and accomplishments in fiscal year 2019. A key MHCC activity
was releasing a strategic report for calendar years 2019–2022. Activities of the Commission are arranged
to correspond with the priorities specified in the strategic report. In addition, this report contains
information on MHCC’s efforts to support statewide initiatives and respond to legislative directives.
The Maryland Health Care Commission 2019-2022 Strategic Report The Maryland Health Care Commission released its “2019-2022
Strategic Report” in early 2019. This report was a major
milestone of 2019. The report was developed following the
November 2018 MHCC Strategic Retreat. During the retreat,
Commissioners and MHCC staff reviewed past activities,
brainstormed potential opportunities, and set priorities for
upcoming years. The plan also includes input from an online
survey and phone interviews completed before the strategic
retreat.
In the report, the Commission identifies five strategic priorities
to advance Maryland’s health care goals. The Maryland Health
Care Commission’s strategic plan for 2019–2020 contains the
following five priorities:
• Educate, inform, and engage the health care community
on MHCC activities to elevate the success of the
Commission’s work in all priority areas.
• Make MHCC the trusted source of quality and cost
information by increasing the use of MHCC quality and
cost data by all members of the State health care system, including Maryland residents, to
increase price transparency and reduce use of low-value care.
• Modernize the Certificate of Need Program to minimize administrative burden and support the
State’s goals under the All-Payer Model (now the Total Cost of Care Model).
• Enable providers to participate in value-based payment models by collaborating with
stakeholders to engage specialty groups and facilitating wider adoption of alternative payment
models.
• Expand the use of telehealth services in a variety of health care settings by educating providers
and patients and evaluating grant programs.
This report contains an overview of Maryland’s health care environment, a discussion on MHCC’s plans to
address social determinants of health and health disparities, and a description of the Commission’s
strategic priorities.
View the full report here.
3
Health System Quality and Cost Transparency
The Maryland Health Care Commission has a number of ongoing programs related to health care system
quality and cost transparency data. The Commission’s statute mandates evaluation of the quality and
performance of Maryland’s health care providers. These mandates serve to increase health system
transparency, promote informed decision-making among consumers, facilitate improvements in the
delivery of care, and support the State’s unique hospital rate-setting system.
In December 2014, the Commission introduced the Maryland Health Care Quality Reports website
(https://healthcarequality.mhcc.maryland.gov), a comprehensive, consumer-friendly resource tool that
brings together mandated public reporting initiatives on hospitals, long-term care, ambulatory surgery
centers, and Maryland health insurance plans.
The Commission also manages Maryland’s All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), which includes claim and
eligibility information from Medicare, Medicaid, and 37 private payers. The APCD is used to report on
total health care costs and utilization.
2019 Milestones • Completed the calendar year (CY) 2018 Healthcare-Associated Infection public reporting initiative.
Hospitals continued to make solid improvements on most reported infection types. Results are posted
on the Maryland Health Care Quality Reports website and updated annually.
• Collaborated with The Leapfrog Group to enable Maryland hospitals to receive national patient safety
ratings.
• Implemented a statewide marketing campaign to increase public awareness of the Quality Reports
website. Engaged a marketing firm to produce a how-to-use video, which is now posted on the website.
Ran advertisements, using the video, in local movie theaters.
• Completed the 2018 Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Survey. Survey results indicate that
Marylanders are satisfied with nursing homes overall.
• Completed the 2018–2019 Nursing Home and Assisted Living Employee Influenza Vaccination Surveys.
Nursing homes reported 88% of their employees were vaccinated, and assisted living facilities reported
57% of their employees were vaccinated.
• Enhanced collaboration with the hospice industry by distributing performance reports to hospice
providers. The reports were generated from data collected through the annual Maryland Hospice
Survey.
• Reduced APCD data submission errors and reduced review time.• Completed several reports and studies utilizing the APCD, including “Spending and Use among
Maryland's Privately Fully-Insured 2017,” “Payment for Professional Services in Maryland (2015 –
2017),” and “Privately insured Mental Health and Substance Abuse Spending in Maryland (2013 –
2017).”
4
Public Reporting/Transparency Initiatives The Commission has a variety of initiatives that are focused on publicly reporting information related to
health care quality and health care cost.
Healthcare-Associated Infection Public Reporting Initiative All acute-care hospitals in Maryland are required by the MHCC to report six types of health care–
associated infections to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare
Safety Network system. These infection types are 1) central line–associated bloodstream infections
(CLABSI); 2) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); 3) Clostridium difficile (C. diff.); 4)
catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI); 5) health care worker influenza vaccination rates;
and 6) surgical site infections for hip, knee, Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hysterectomy, and
colon surgery. Since implementation of this public reporting initiative, Maryland hospitals have continued
to make solid improvements to reduce health care–associated infections. In fiscal year (FY) 2019, the
Commission collected and analyzed CY 2018 infection data that showed Maryland hospital performance
was better than the national baseline for reducing C. diff., CAUTI, and CLABSI in intensive care units.
These performance measures are updated on the Quality Reports website annually. In an effort to
promote greater collaboration among hospitals, MHCC hosted a series of interactive learning sessions
geared toward infection preventionists.
Collaboration with The Leapfrog Group The Leapfrog Group is an independent national nonprofit organization that annually rates hospitals on
patient safety performance. Historically, Maryland hospital participation in The Leapfrog Group’s hospital
rating system was limited to a few hospitals that voluntarily participated with Leapfrog. To facilitate
greater transparency, the Commission worked with The Leapfrog Group to generate the measure results
needed to include Maryland hospitals in their Hospital Safety Grade system. MHCC continues to support
this national grading system.
Increasing Public Awareness of the Quality Reports Consumer Website Increasing public awareness of the Quality Reports consumer website was a major focus in FY 2019.
Commission activities included social media posts, consumer focus groups, conference exhibits, website
demonstrations, and distribution of brochures and information to get the word out to the public. The
Commission engaged a marketing firm to create promotional materials and advertisement media,
including a short video describing how to use the website. The video was placed on the Quality Reports
website homepage and has been very positively received. A shorter video was played during movie
theater previews, and posters were displayed in movie theater lobbies across the State. The video was
also advertised to selected target audiences on YouTube. The marketing efforts resulted in roughly a 20%
increase in website use during the advertising campaign. Updated data was added to the site throughout
the year to ensure visitors saw accurate and timely information.
Price Transparency: Hospital Diagnosis-Related Groups and Wear the Cost The Commission publishes hospital cost information for consumers through the Quality Reports
consumer website in the form of cost data on Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), and publishes the cost of
shoppable hospital-based services on the Wear the Cost site.
The Commission has expanded the price information on the Quality Reports consumer website from the
15 most frequently occurring DRGs to reporting all DRG categories and enhanced the presentation of the
data from a PDF document to a searchable database that allows consumers to sort by payer, volume,
5
average length of hospital stay, and hospital average charge per case. Going forward, the hospital price
transparency display will include hospital outpatient procedure volume and average charge per case.
Price information for all DRGs is available at here. As an example of price information by payer, the
following webpage displays average DRGs for Medicare here.
Another price transparency initiative of the Commission is the Wear the Cost initiative. The goal of the
Wear the Cost initiative (WeartheCost.org) is to increase transparency of cost and quality differences
among Maryland hospitals for shoppable health care services. The website shows a patient’s average cost
for standard hospital procedures (e.g., hip and knee replacements, vaginal delivery, and hysterectomy) at
different Maryland hospitals. The site shows two kinds of costs: typical and expected costs for the
procedure and costs associated with potentially avoidable complications (PACs) such as surgical mistakes.
Hospitals that have low total costs and low PAC rates may offer the best value for patients. In early FY
1 APR-DRG means “All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups”, which is a system that classifies patients based on reason for admission and risk factors. 2 Maryland Healthcare Quality Reports website
(https://healthcarequality.mhcc.maryland.gov/public/TopDrgPricingForHospitals).
Table 1: Average Charge per Case for Selected High Case Volume Hospitals for Selected APR-DRGs1 Calendar Year 20182
Newborn and Delivery
Medical Conditions (APR-DRG)
State Average
Adventist Shady Grove
Anne Arundel Center
Holy Cross Hospital
Silver Spring
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Howard County
Memorial
Normal newborn
$2,191 $3,477 $1,845 $1,624 $2,490 $2,037
Vaginal delivery
$8,297 $6,408 $6,553 $7,283 $6,040 $8,546
Cesarean delivery
$10,359 $7,077 $7,532 $8,012 $8,740 $10,374
Common Joint Procedures
Medical Conditions (APR-DRG)
State Average
MedStar Union
Memorial Hospital
Mercy Medical Center
Sinai Hospital
Suburban Hospital
University of Maryland St.
Joseph Medical Center
Knee joint replacement
$23,457 $24,635 $17,959 $31,590 $18,533 $18,721
Hip joint replacement
$23,191 $21,296 $18,382 $31,835 $18,769 $19,260
6
2019, MHCC added data and functionality to this website, including a function that allows consumers to
run custom reports. MHCC also promoted the site using digital advertising and social media campaigns. In
fiscal year 2019, over 16,000 users visited the Wear the Cost website, including more than 5,000 users
from Maryland.
Consumer Guide to Long Term Care The Consumer Guide to Long Term Care website offers information to Maryland consumers regarding
long-term care services and facilities (i.e., nursing homes, assisted living, hospice, adult day care, home
health) in Maryland. The guides include information Marylanders can use to evaluate the quality and
suitability of different long-term care facilities, including facility statistics, federal quality measures,
results of the annual Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Survey, and results of the Nursing Home
and Assisted Living Employee Influenza Vaccination Survey. The Commission updates data on the Long
Term Care Consumer Guide throughout the year. The Long Term Care Guide is the most frequently visited
consumer site managed by the Commission, with approximately 20,000 viewers annually.
The Value of Publicly Reporting Employee Influenza Vaccination Rates In FY 2010, the Commission implemented requirements for the collection and reporting of employee
influenza vaccination rates for hospitals. In the following years, the reporting requirement was extended
to nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and ambulatory surgery centers. This information is included
on the Maryland Quality Reports and Consumer Guide to Long Term Care websites. With increased public
awareness of the value of employee vaccination in preventing infections, the vaccination rates increased
for all provider types. The statewide hospital employee vaccination rate increased from 78% when the
requirement was first initiated in FY 2010 to 97% in FY 2019. This rate was higher than the national
average for hospitals, making Maryland one of the top-performing states according to the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In FY 2019, almost all hospitals reported that a mandatory
employee flu vaccination policy was in place. Similarly, nursing homes improved from reporting a 58%
vaccination rate for the 2018–2019 flu season to 87% for the most recent flu season. Improvement has
not been as strong in Maryland’s assisted living facilities, reporting a 50% vaccination rate following the
2012–2013 flu season to 56% in the 2018–2019 flu season. In comparison, the CDC reports the national
vaccination rate of 68% for long-term care staff. The number of MD nursing homes that have
implemented mandatory vaccination policies has increased by 10 percent over the past five years. Fiscal
year 2019 was the first year that vaccination policy information was collected from assisted living
facilities.
Table 2: Nursing Home and Assisted Living Employee Influenza Vaccinations, 2018–2019
CDC National Vaccination Rate for Health Care Workers (HCWs) in Long-Term Care 68%
Maryland Nursing Home HCW Vaccination Rate 88%
Maryland Nursing Homes with Staff Vaccination Rate of ≥95% 44%
Maryland Nursing Homes with Mandatory Vaccination Policy in Place 56%
Maryland Assisted Living HCW Vaccination Rate 57%
Maryland Assisted Living Facilities with Staff Vaccination Rate of ≥95% 20%
Maryland Assisted Living Facilities with Mandatory Vaccination Policy in Place 36%
7
Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Survey Each year, the Commission conducts a survey of family members of nursing home residents on their
experience. In the 2018–2019 data collection year, the Commission enhanced the Nursing Home Family
Experience of Care Survey by adding questions to create a more comprehensive survey of satisfaction
with Maryland nursing homes. In addition, the survey included an assessment of families’ overall rating of
the nursing home and whether they would recommend the nursing home to others. As part of the
enhancements to the survey in FY 2019, a Spanish-language option was included. The results of the
survey completed in FY 2019 indicated a “good” to “very good” level of satisfaction with Maryland
nursing homes.
Table 3: Summary of Nursing Home Family Experience of Care Domain Scores—2018 Statewide Results
Survey Domain Statewide Score3
Staff and Administration of the Nursing Home 3.42
Care Provided to Residents 3.35
Food and Meals 3.09
Autonomy and Resident Rights 3.31
Physical Aspects of the Nursing Home 3.18
Activities 3.01
Security and Residents’ Personal Rights 3.30
Overall Rating of Care Received at the Nursing Home4 7.73
Percentage of “Definitely Yes” or “Probably Yes”
Responses to “Would You Recommend the Nursing
Home?”
81%
Expanding the Usability of Maryland’s APCD Maryland’s All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) includes claim and eligibility information from Medicare,
Medicaid, and 37 private payers. The APCD is used to report on total health care costs and utilization.
Payers That Contribute Data In FY 2019, all private payers whose total covered lives exceed 1,000, as reported to the Maryland
Insurance Administration (MIA), are required to report the APCD. The makeup of private payers reporting
3 Scores are calculated based on the questions in each item. Questions are scored by assigning the most positive possible answer category a score of 4, and the least positive possible answer a score of 1. 4 Unlike the other domains, which are calculated on a score from one to four, the “overall rating of care received at the nursing home” is calculated on a scale from one to ten.
8
data to the APCD includes life and health insurers, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), third-party
administrators, pharmacy benefits managers, and qualified health and dental plans. The APCD excludes
self-insured ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) plans data due to the Gobeille v. Liberty
Mutual Supreme Court ruling on March 1, 2016. This loss was about 1.1 million members or 31% of the
privately insured population in the APCD. At the end of FY 2019, the U.S. Office of Personnel
Management restricted all payers who had contracts with the department from reporting federal
employees health benefits (FEHB) plans data to all APCDs, including Maryland’s. This FEHB loss was about
580,000 members or 21% of the remaining privately insured population after the ERISA loss. Both of
these policy decisions by the federal government resulted in combined losses of about 1.68 million
members or 44% of the privately insured population in the APCD. However, the APCD continues to fully
capture the insurance markets that are regulated under Maryland law: the individual market, the small-
group market, and the regulated large-group market. The population of the APCD includes Maryland
residents and non-residents whose group contracts are written or sold in Maryland. The number of
privately insured residents in the Maryland APCD as of June 30, 2019, was about 1.7 million (including
subscribers and their dependents, excluding ERISA and FEHB plans).
MHCC is committed to improving the rate of APCD data submissions and reducing the data review
timeframe. MHCC has worked diligently with payers to improve the data submission process by
reminding payers to review all data internally before reporting to the APCD portal. MHCC has also
collaborated with its current data vendor to improve on a data review rate through the data validation
process. As a result of these efforts, the percent of payers that submitted 100% clean data hit an all-time
high of 89% for the first quarter of 2019. These results continued for the remainder of 2019.
Figure 1: Timeliness of Data Submissions Improved in 2019 (Percent of Payers Medical Care Data Base Submission Status 1 month after Submission Deadline)
9
Key Reports and Studies APCD Data Submission Manual to Payers: The Commission is required to provide an updated data
submission manual to payers annually. The 2019 manual emphasized the protection of confidential
information of all covered members in all APCD data submissions. Specifically, MHCC required payers to
attest that all APCD data submissions exclude unencrypted patient identifiers.
Report on 2017 Privately Insured Health Care Spending: This report examines health care spending
and benefit usage among Maryland’s privately insured population for 2017 (i.e., individuals enrolled in
fully insured and self-insured health plans).5 For all markets combined, the annual per-member spending
and the population’s illness burden increased from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 2: Annual Spending and Risk among the Privately Insured for 2015–2017
5 This report, as well as more recent reports in the series, is available from https://mhcc.maryland.gov/mhcc/pages/plr/plr_healthmd/plr_healthmd.aspx.
10
Figure 3: Privately Insured Annual Per-Member Spending by Service Category, 2017
Report on 2017 Payment Rates for Professional Services: This report examines variations in payment
rates for professional services among private health insurers, benchmarking payments to public rates for
the same services.6 Private payment rates for all payers combined were 97% of the Medicare rate for
2015 and 103% for 2017.
MIA Study on Mental and Behavioral Health in Maryland: As part of a broader study, MHCC provided
the MIA with APCD data on mental health and substance abuse. Results showed that mental health and
substance abuse spending for Maryland residents enrolled in private health plans increased at a faster
rate than non-mental health and substance abuse spending over the same period (2013–2017).
6 This report, as well as more recent reports in the series, is available from https://mhcc.maryland.gov/mhcc/pages/plr/plr_healthmd/plr_healthmd.aspx.
$768 (15%)
$924 (17%)
$108 (2%)$1,548
(29%)
$372 (7%)
$1,584 (30%)
Inpatient Hospital Facility Outpatient Hospital Facility
Outpatient Non-Hospital Facility Professional Services
Labs/Imaging Prescription Drugs
11
Figure 4: Privately Insured Mental Health and Substance Abuse Annual Spending Per Member, Cumulative Trends from 2013 to 2017, Medical Only
MIA Rate Review: MHCC also collaborates with the MIA by providing enrollment and claims data along
with per member per month trend analyses to support MIA’s health insurance rate review activities. In
fiscal year 2019, the Commission provided the MIA with three years of privately insured health care data
and analysis.
HMO Payments to Non-Participating Providers: Maryland Health-General, §19-710.1, specifies a
methodology to calculate minimum payment rates that HMOs must pay to non-contracting (non-trauma)
providers that offer a covered evaluation and management service to an HMO patient. The Commission is
required to annually update these minimum payment rates, which are published by the MIA. MHCC
analysts also noted that 95% of the 2019 HMO payments were below $400.
Looking Ahead A significant challenge for effective public reporting of health care information continues to be the
conversion of complex clinical data and metrics into timely, meaningful, and understandable information
for consumers and policymakers. The Commission is integrating its consumer guides for different facility
and provider types into a single website to provide a more streamlined, uniform, consumer-friendly
approach to accessing quality and cost information. Through this process, the Commission will assess the
value of the information included on its site as well as how to effectively display the information using
consumer focus groups and provider industry engagement. The hospital price transparency feature will
be enhanced with outpatient procedure volume and price information. Finally, with the completion of the
redesigned website, the Commission will focus on a major marketing effort to increase public awareness
12
of the information it makes available to Maryland residents to support informed health care decision-
making.
MHCC anticipates releasing a re-compete request for proposal for a new APCD vendor in 2020. MHCC is
also working on updating APCD regulations and creating a new APCD data application to expand and
improve the Commission’s APCD data release process. MHCC expects to move forward with an initiative
to reduce low-value care during fiscal years 2020 and 2021. This initiative will build on the Commission’s
efforts to educate consumers about health care value. In addition, the Commission plans to revamp the
current price-compare dashboard for health care provider professional services. The staff has already
created a prototype of the new web-based dashboard. Finally, MHCC is in the early stages of creating a
prescription drug price comparison site.
All of these projects are part of the Commission’s strategic priority to make MHCC the trusted source for
cost and quality information.
13
Health Facilities Planning and Certificate of Need
MHCC is legislatively mandated to plan for and maintain the availability and financial viability of health
care facilities and services for the State of Maryland. The purpose of state health planning and the
Certificate of Need (CON) program, which requires certain types of health care facility and service
projects to obtain approval from MHCC, is to ensure that health care facilities and services produce high
value for the State’s residents. MHCC certifies that the facilities established, relocated, or reconfigured
are:
• Needed
• High quality
• Geographically and financially accessible
• Financially viable
In addition, the Commission supports the establishment and updating of regulations, known as the State
Health Plan (SHP), which inform the regulated facilities about the requirements for obtaining CON
approval of their development plans. The Commission is committed to a multi-year process of
modernizing Maryland’s Certificate of Need processes for health care facilities.
2019 Milestones • Began a new phase of CON modernization to align CON regulation with Maryland’s Total Cost of
Care Model.
• Supported the passage of legislation key to implementing previously recommended CON reforms.
• Completed review of 17 CON applications and five exemptions from CON review in 2019,
including the first conversions of general hospitals to freestanding medical facilities (FMFs).
Modernizing Health Planning and Certificate of Need Regulation In 2018, the Commission adopted a report outlining steps for modernizing the Certificate of Need
process. The 2019 General Assembly session produced several reforms that implemented key
recommendations of the report. These statutory changes include:
• Eliminating capital expenditure thresholds as a basis for requiring CON review and approval of
capital projects for all health care facilities other than hospitals.
• Increasing the capital expenditure threshold for hospital projects from approximately $12.5
million to the lesser of $50 million or 25% of the hospital’s gross budgeted revenue. This change
helped synchronize hospital CON regulation and Maryland’s Total Cost of Care payment model.7
• Amending the definition of “ambulatory surgical facility” from an outpatient surgical center with
two sterile operating rooms to a center with three sterile operating rooms. This change is likely to
eliminate a substantial number of CON application and exemption reviews over time that would
have otherwise been required.
• Eliminating statutory language that had created an uneven playing field between hospitals and
physicians with respect to development of outpatient surgical centers. Under the amended law,
7 The Health Services Cost Review Commission has adopted a policy for adjusting global revenue budgets for major capital projects that includes eligibility criteria that closely mirror this new regulatory threshold.
14
any person, including a hospital, can establish a market-priced outpatient surgical center with up
to two operating rooms without obtaining a CON. Prior to this change in law, hospitals needed a
CON to add surgical capacity in any setting.
• Eliminating the requirement for an existing general hospice to obtain a CON to add inpatient
beds, through either establishing an inpatient hospice unit or expanding an existing unit.
• Eliminating the requirement for an existing alcoholism and drug abuse intermediate care facility
to add beds.
State Health Plan Updates Two SHP chapters of regulation were updated in 2019. The regulations for review of specialized
cardiovascular services (COMAR 10.24.17) were updated to revise standards for ongoing performance
review of cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These revised regulations also
establish a new definition of cardiac surgery that reflects the evolution of this service. The regulations for
review of comprehensive care facility or nursing home services were also updated (COMAR 10.24.20).
New features of these regulations include docketing rules that incorporate minimal performance
requirements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Nursing Home Compare star rating
system and a revised methodology for projecting the need for nursing home bed capacity.
Key Capacity Planning Decisions MHCC completed the review of 17 CON applications in 2019 and made final decisions on six requests to
change approved CONs. MHCC also reviewed five requests for exemptions from CON review, an
alternative and more limited project review process available for some types of projects.
Notable 2019 projects include the first conversions of general hospitals in Maryland to FMFs. These
emergency treatment centers operate 24 hours per day, every day, and are staffed and equipped like
hospital emergency departments but do not admit patients for overnight inpatient stays. They can
observe patients for short periods to determine whether the patient requires transfer to a general
hospital for admission.
Hospital Conversions to Freestanding Medical Facilities
University of Maryland (UM) Laurel Regional Hospital in Prince George’s County was authorized to convert
to FMF status in September 2018 and made the conversion in January 2019 using existing facilities. Its
parent hospital is UM Prince George’s Hospital Center in Cheverly, with a replacement hospital under
construction in Largo. A new Laurel Medical Center outpatient campus is under development and will
provide a range of outpatient services, including ambulatory surgery, when completed.
UM Shore Medical Center at Dorchester (located in Cambridge, Dorchester County) was also authorized to
convert to an FMF in April 2019, and it is anticipated that the transition from hospital to FMF campus will
take place in 2021. UM Shore Medical Center at Easton will be the parent hospital of the Cambridge FMF.
In the ten-year period preceding the proposed conversion of these general hospitals to outpatient care
campuses, demand for inpatient hospitalization dropped substantially. In the case of Laurel Regional,
average daily census dropped 43%. In the case of Shore at Dorchester, average daily census declined by
37%. Statewide, general hospital average daily census declined 14% between 2010 and 2020.
15
FY 2019 also saw the first use of a new regulatory process for periodic review of the performance of all
cardiac surgery and PCI programs. In calendar year 2019, eight cardiac surgery programs were reviewed
against performance standards established in COMAR 10.24.17. Seven were found fully compliant and
granted four-year ongoing performance certification. One program with case volumes falling below the
target of 200 cases per year was otherwise found to have acceptable performance in all other areas and
was given three-year certification.
Tables providing additional details on Certificate of Need applications reviewed, approved, and/or
changed in FY 2019 are in Appendix B: Tables of Certificates of Need Reviewed, Approved, or Changed in
FY 2019
Looking Ahead The next phase of health planning and CON modernization will focus on updating and streamlining the
procedural regulations and SHP regulations that govern decisions on projects and the project review
process. MHCC will also pursue additional opportunities for statutory changes aimed at a more rational
scope of CON regulation.
16
Expanding Adoption of Information Technology in Health Care
The MHCC is responsible for advancing the adoption and meaningful use of health information
technology (health IT). Health IT enables treating providers to have accurate, complete, and up-to-date
patient information at the point of care delivery. The use of health IT facilitates the collection of
information that can improve disease surveillance, increase health care knowledge, and shape best
practice guidelines. Broad diffusion of health IT is essential to support alternative care delivery models
that lead to improved efficiencies and higher quality of care. Leading elements of health IT include health
information exchange (HIE), electronic health records (EHRs), and expanding telehealth.
2019 Milestones • Assessed statewide progress of EHRs, use of HIE, and adoption of telehealth.
• Registered national HIEs that meet the revised definition of an HIE in Maryland law.
• Provided privacy and security policy oversight to the State-Designated HIE (Chesapeake Regional
Information System for our Patients, or CRISP); re-designated CRISP as the State-Designated HIE.
• Completed three legislatively required health IT studies.
• Organized a health care facility cybersecurity readiness and risk management symposium.
• Convened the Maryland Primary Care Advisory Council, which provides input to the Secretary of
the Maryland Department of Health on the operations of the Maryland Primary Care Program
(MDPCP).
• Established a Care Management Focus Group to address policy challenges and identify best
practices for advancing care management in ambulatory practices.
• Provided practice transformation support to 800 providers participating in the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services Practice Transformation Network.
Statewide Progress on EHR Diffusion, Use of HIE, and Adoption of Telehealth The MHCC assesses health provider adoption and meaningful use of health IT to draw comparisons to
national uptake. Health IT assessments help MHCC identify trends and relevant policy matters that
support awareness, build on the current landscape, and inform policy development, implementation, and
evaluation. MHCC’s efforts to promote adoption and meaningful use of EHRs continued throughout the
year. A snapshot of EHR adoption by care setting is shown below.
Table 4: EHR Adoption in Maryland by Care Setting
EHR Adoption Rate (%)
Care Setting Maryland Nation
Acute-Care Hospitals 100 96
Dentists 60 56
Office-Based Physicians 74 80
Nursing Homes 91 66
Notes: Maryland data is self-reported and has not been audited for accuracy; national data was obtained
from publicly available sources.
17
Key Initiatives to Expand Health Information Technology
Electronic Prescription Records System Assessment and Report: In 2019, MHCC and stakeholders
completed a report on implementation of a statewide repository of patient prescription medication
history information. The system would collect and make available to authorized users (treating health
care providers and dispensers) information on non-controlled substances (NCS) dispensed in Maryland.
Currently, the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) makes available information on controlled
dangerous substances (CDS) Schedules II through V dispensed in Maryland. In July 2018, MHCC began
convening a workgroup of stakeholders including health care providers, pharmacists, consumers, and
others to deliberate on specific aspects of a statewide repository as it relates to implementation,
consumer privacy and education, and governance and funding. The workgroup concluded that a
statewide repository for NCS complements CDS reporting requirements in Maryland and can bridge gaps
in medication reconciliation.
Health Record and Payment Integration Program Advisory Committee Report: MHCC was asked to
establish an Advisory Committee to study the feasibility of creating a health record and payment
integration program. The findings of the Committee were published in 2019, including feasibility of
establishing a free and secure web-based portal that providers can use, regardless of the method of
payment being used for health care services, to create and maintain health records and file for payment
for health care services provided; feasibility of incorporating the PDMP data into CRISP; and approaches
for accelerating the adjudication of clean claims. The Committee recommended continuing to explore
opportunities to leverage gains from existing health IT investments, which are foundational for value-
based care and essential to improving health care quality, safety, and efficiency.
School-Based Telehealth: In March 2018, the Senate Finance Committee charged MHCC with convening
a stakeholder workgroup to identify deficiencies in existing policies that limit diffusion of telehealth in
Maryland primary and secondary schools and develop statutory, regulatory, and/or technical
recommendations to improve these policies. The workgroup considered the value proposition of
telehealth in schools; the current landscape, including industry trends and innovation; and funding. The
workgroup assessed policy challenges related to telehealth adoption in schools under the existing
regulatory oversight framework within the Maryland State Department of Education and the Maryland
Department of Health. The workgroup recommendations address fundamental challenges as they relate
to diffusing telehealth in schools and center on awareness building, privacy and security, and oversight. A
final report was released in October 2019.
18
Cybersecurity: The Cybersecurity Readiness and Risk Management
Symposium was the third collaboration among MHCC, the Maryland
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, the Maryland
Hospital Association, and HSCRC to bring together stakeholders and
industry experts to share and discuss best practices related to improving
cybersecurity governance and operational controls. The MHCC shared
information on data analyzed on health care breaches available from the
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
online portal. The analysis included breaches reported to OCR that affected
500 or more individuals and assessed breach trends in Maryland and the nation.
Oversight of CRISP, the State-Designated HIE The Maryland General Assembly, in Health-General §19-143, charges MHCC and HSCRC with the
designation of a statewide health information exchange (HIE) for the State of Maryland. In 2009, MHCC
and HSCRC competitively selected CRISP as the State-Designated HIE.
CRISP is responsible for building and maintaining the technical infrastructure that can support the secure
exchange of electronic health information statewide. In 2019, the MHCC re-designated CRISP as the
State-Designated HIE, and additional requirements around privacy, security, and sustainability were
included in the three-year designation agreement. The MHCC continued to collaborate with CRISP to
advance the technical infrastructure that supports the secure exchange of electronic health information.
The CRISP governance model includes several broad-based stakeholder advisory committees (Executive,
Clinical, Data Use, Privacy and Security, Reporting and Analytics, Finance, and Technology) in which MHCC
participates. An annual independent audit of CRISP was conducted to ensure compliance with the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as amended by the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR),
and cybersecurity standards.
Looking Ahead In FY 2020, an online telehealth readiness assessment tool was released for use by practices to assess
telehealth readiness in five domains: core readiness, financial considerations, operations, staff
engagement, and patient readiness. Various health IT awareness-building events will occur for allied
health care providers (e.g., dentists and podiatrists). The MHCC will modernize COMAR 10.25.18, Health
Information Exchanges: Privacy and Security of Protected Health Information, to align the regulations
with federal policies and the future direction of electronic health information. The MHCC, in collaboration
with CRISP, will design and develop an HIE consumer consent management tool that will enable
consumers to control access and disclosure of their electronic health information. Several care
management resource tools will be released to help practices achieve sustainable and continued quality
improvement. A practice symposium for managing patient populations and team-based care will occur in
partnership with HSCRC, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and MedChi, The Maryland State Medical Society.
Several virtual webinars will occur that are aimed at improving practice quality.
19
Supporting Statewide Initiatives
MHCC collaborates with other State agencies, provider organizations, health facilities, consumer groups,
and others to support statewide health care initiatives. For example, the Commission supported the
Health Resources Cost Review Commission in planning and implementing the Total Cost of Care Model,
which began January 1, 2019. The Commission also worked with trauma centers through the State on the
Maryland Trauma Physician Service Fund.
2019 Milestones • Provided analytical support for the Maryland All-Payer Model.
• Released annual report to the Maryland General Assembly on the status of the Trauma Fund.
Evolving the Maryland Health Model
Analytical Support and Information Sharing MHCC collaborates with HSCRC by providing health care data (enrollment and claims data releases) in
support of the Maryland All-Payer Model. In fiscal year 2019, MHCC delivered quarterly files and a 2017
annual per capita cost analysis in support of monitoring TCOC Model performance. In an APCD
benchmark analysis done by Milliman Actuaries for HSCRC, the company determined that despite the
ERISA data loss due to Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual, the 2017 APCD data is a viable data source to monitor
the TCOC Model. The Milliman analysis was done by comparing data reported by payers (membership
and claims) in carriers’ National Association of Insurance Commissioners insurance blanks (annual
statements) to the health care data in the APCD per health insurance carrier. During fiscal year 2020,
Milliman will benchmark the 2018 APCD data using the same approach. CareFirst, the State’s largest
payer, supported the results of the benchmark analysis on the insurer’s APCD data.
The Maryland Primary Care Program The Maryland Primary Care Program (MDPCP) is a key initiative under the State’s Total Cost of Care
Model. The MDPCP Advisory Council provides input to the operations of the MDPCP and serves in a
consultative role to the Secretary of Health. The Council consists of 22 MHCC-appointed members who
represent a broad range of stakeholders. The Council convened on several occasions to consider
enhancements to quality measure reporting; challenges and opportunities to engage commercial payers
in the program; adding a potential program Track 3 and Track 4; and reducing program administrative
activities. The MDPCP is a voluntary program open to all qualifying Maryland primary care providers and
provides funding and support for the delivery of advanced primary care throughout the State. The MDPCP
supports primary care providers in increasing their role in prevention, management of chronic disease,
and prevention of unnecessary hospital utilization.
Supportive Efforts for the Maryland Model Expanding Care Management: MHCC has convened a Care Management Focus Group to identify best
practices for care management in ambulatory practices and develop recommendations for care
management resources. Focus group activities are aimed at identifying strategies and best practices to
improve care management for populations with modifiable risks; align care management services to the
needs of patients; and identify, prepare, and integrate a team-based approach to deliver the needed
services. The focus group designed resource tools for establishing a care management program,
identifying care manager responsibilities, and determining minimum qualifications for a care manager.
20
Building Practice Transformation Networks: Practice Transformation Networks (PTNs) are peer-based
learning networks designed to coach, mentor, and assist providers in developing core competencies
specific to practice transformation, such as improving patient care, organization, and workflow. In 2016,
MHCC began a partnership with MedChi and the Maryland Learning Collaborative (University of
Maryland) to transform over 800 providers statewide. In June 2019, the PTN was recognized by the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for achieving enrollment goals, supporting transformation,
improving health outcomes, reducing unnecessary hospitalizations, generating savings, and reducing
unnecessary tests and procedures.
The Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund: The Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund provides payments to offset the costs of uncompensated
and undercompensated medical care provided by trauma physicians to patients at Maryland’s designated
trauma centers, stipends to trauma centers to offset the trauma centers’ on-call and standby expenses,
and grant funding to trauma centers for certain equipment. The fund is financed by a $5 surcharge on
motor vehicle registrations.
2003 legislation established a formula for reimbursing trauma centers for trauma-related on-call
expenses for trauma surgeons, orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and anesthesiologists. Requirements for on-
call availability for Level I–III trauma centers are established by the Maryland Institute for Emergency
Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS).
MHCC and HSCRC annually report to the Maryland General Assembly on the status of the Trauma Fund.
In 2019, revenue collections by the Motor Vehicle Administration via the $5 surcharge increased to
$12,707,734. In total, the Trauma Fund disbursed about $11.9 million to trauma centers and trauma
physician practices over the past fiscal year. Also in 2019, the Maryland General Assembly passed a bill to
provide PARC/Maryland Shock Trauma with access to on-call and standby cost payments from the
Trauma Fund. A full report, “Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund: Operations from July 1, 2017
through June 30, 2019,” is available on the MHCC website.
Looking Ahead MHCC plans to continue to support statewide initiatives in FY 2020, including ongoing work on the
initiatives mentioned above. In addition, MHCC is assisting in the implementation of the Prescription Drug
Affordability Board. This Board was established to protect the State from high prescription drug costs,
create a Physician Drug Affordability Stakeholder Council, develop a process that requires the Board to
identify drugs with certain costs, and report on the entire pharmaceutical distribution and payment
system to lower the list price of drugs. This foundational work is to be completed by the end of 2020. The
Commission is well positioned to support the Board with data on prescription drug claims from private
and public payers. At the request of the Governor, the Commission will work with the Maryland
Department of Budget Management and the Board to determine the most cost-effective approach to
meeting the short- and long-term staffing needs of the Board.
21
Responding to Legislative Directives
The Maryland Health Care Commission is routinely asked by the Maryland General Assembly to conduct
short-term projects to research policy issues, facilitate stakeholder discussion, and provide informed
recommendations to the General Assembly. The Commission had nine short-term legislative projects that
were active during some part of fiscal year 2019. Brief descriptions of these projects can be found in
Appendix B. Additional information about each of these projects is available on the Maryland Health
Commission website.
Table 5: Legislative Workgroups active in 2019
Topic Deliverables Source of Legislative Directive
Physician Maintenance of
Certification Workgroup Final Letter, November 2018
Letter, House Health and
Government Operations Committee
(2018)
Certificate of Need
Modernization Taskforce
Interim Report, June 2018
Final Report, December 2018
Letter, Senate Finance Committee
and House Health and Government
Operations Committee (2017)
EMS Reimbursement for New
Delivery Models Final Report, January 2019 Senate Bill 682 (2018)
Health Record and Payment
Integration Program Advisory
Committee
Final Report, May 2019 Senate Bill 896 (2018)
Electronic Prescription Records
System—Assessment and Report Final Report, July 2019 House Bill 115 (2018)
School-Based Telehealth
Workgroup
Interim Report, January 2019
Final Report, October 2019
Letter, Senate Finance Committee
(2018)
Study of Mortality Rates of
African American Infants and
Infants in Rural Areas
Final Report, November 2019 Senate Bill 266 (2018)
Study of Proposed Mandated
Health Insurance Services: EMS
Treat and Release Programs, EMS
Alternative Destination Programs,
and EMS Mobile Integrated
Health Programs
Final Report, December 2019
Letter, Senate Finance and House
Health and Government Operations
Committees (2019)
Assessment of Service Changes at
the University of Maryland Shore
Medical Center at Chestertown
Final Report, January 2020
Senate Bill 1010 (2019) and Joint
Conference Report for House Bill 100
(2019)
22
Section 2: MHCC Organization, Operations, and Budget
MHCC Organization The Commission is organized around health care systems it seeks to evaluate, regulate, or influence,
bringing a wide range of tools (data gathering, public reporting, planning, and regulation) to bear to
improve quality, address costs, and increase access. MHCC’s activities are directed and managed by the
Commission Executive Director. Administrative activities, such as staffing, budget, and procurement, are
managed by the Director of Administration. Two Assistant Attorneys General provide legal advice and
counsel to the Executive Director, the Commission members, and Commission staff.
MHCC staff members’ backgrounds and skills encompass a broad range of expertise, including public
policy analysis, data management and analysis, health planning, health facilities construction and
financing, Medicaid administration, quality assessment, clinical and health services research, law, and
public performance reporting.
Most Commission staff are organized into four Centers, described below. Two of the four Centers—the
Center for Health Care Facilities Planning and Development and the Center for Quality Measurement and
Reporting—are organized around provider organizations, bringing together under the same leadership
the expertise and tools to address cost, quality, and access in those sectors of Maryland’s health care
system. The Center for Analysis and Information Systems conducts broad studies, using both Maryland
databases and national surveys, but also has specific responsibilities relating to physician services. The
fourth Center, the Center for Health Information Technology and Innovative Care Delivery, has
responsibilities that cut across sectors to facilitate the adoption of EHRs and to enable private and secure
transfer of personal health information among sectors.
The Center for Analysis and Information Systems (CAIS)
Director, Kenneth Yeates-Trotman This Center assembles and manages the State’s All-Payer Claims Database from claim and eligibility
information submitted by about 37 private payers, Medicare, and Medicaid. The Center uses the APCD to
report on total health care spending (cost and utilization) and spending for each health care sector,
including hospitals, health care professionals, and prescription drugs. The Center also maintains the Wear
the Cost website, a campaign aimed at increasing transparency of hospital pricing in the State. CAIS plays
a crucial role in one of the Commission’s strategic priorities in making MHCC the trusted source for cost
and quality information.
The Center for Quality Measurement and Reporting
Director, Theressa Lee The Center for Quality Measurement and Reporting is responsible for the Commission’s health care
provider quality and performance evaluation mandates. These mandates are to increase transparency
and informed decision-making among consumers, to facilitate improvements in the delivery of care, and
to support the State’s unique hospital rate-setting system (i.e., the TCOC Model). The Center maintains
the Maryland Health Care Quality Reports website and the Consumer Guide to Long Term Care. There
were 20,933 total users and 20,733 new users from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019. The Center is
committed to reporting disparities in health and health care and remains focused on raising awareness of
the Quality Reports consumer site among minority and disadvantaged populations.
23
The Center for Health Care Facilities Planning and Development
Director, Paul Parker The Center for Health Care Facilities Planning and Development develops plans for the supply and
distribution of health care facilities and services and regulates the supply and distribution of facilities and
services through CON and related oversight programs. The Center is responsible for development and
updates to the SHP, a body of regulation that establishes criteria and standards for considering the need,
costs and effectiveness, impact, and viability of health care facility capital projects. The Center
administers the Certificate of Need, Certificate of Conformance, and Certificate of Ongoing Performance
programs, which regulate certain aspects of health care service delivery by health care facilities.
The Center collects information on health care capacity service capacity and use. Annual data sets are
developed on the service capacity of general and special hospitals, freestanding ambulatory surgical
facilities, nursing homes, home health agencies, assisted living facilities, and adult day care facilities. The
center also obtains hospital databases on cardiac surgery, cardiac catheterization, and PCI for use in
regulatory oversight of these services.
The Center for Health Information Technology and Innovative Care Delivery
Director, David Sharp The Center is responsible for advancing the implementation of health IT. The Center has a critical role in
facilitating wider adoption of advanced care delivery activities and demonstrations aimed at
implementing a new fundamental strategy focused on patient needs, where primary care is the
foundation for maximizing value in health care delivery through better health outcomes and lower costs.
Spending MHCC operates through special funding collected through an assessment on the health care providers
and payers regulated by the Commission. The amount is derived differently for each industry and is set
every four years based on an analysis of the Commission’s workload. The cap was raised from $12 million
to $16 million in fiscal year 2018 and remained in effect during fiscal year 2019. As in fiscal year 2018, the
Commission assesses the following percentages on industries:
• Payers for an amount not to exceed 26% of the total MHCC budget
• Hospitals for an amount not to exceed 39% of the total MHCC budget
• Health Occupation Boards for an amount not to exceed 16 % of the total MHCC budget
• Nursing homes for an amount not to exceed 19% of the total MHCC budget
The total amount of fiscal year 2019 expenditures was $42,157,110, which includes $13,691,300 spent in
operating costs. The remainder of fiscal year 2019 expenditures were used to manage critical funds
through the MHCC as follows:
• Maryland Trauma Physician Service Fund—$11,826,729
• Shock Trauma Grants—$3,300,000
• Integrated Care Network (CRISP)—$13,339,080
MHCC closed fiscal year 2019 with a surplus of $7,019,577.
24
Appendix A: Governance
Figure 5: Maryland Health Care Commission Organizational Chart
Selection Process and Geographic Representation of Commissioners MHCC is governed by 15 members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The Governor appointed the Chairman and the Chairman may select a Vice Chairman. Members are
selected based on type of stakeholder they represent as well as their geographic location. The term of a
member is four years, and a member may not serve more than two consecutive terms.
The composition of the Commission is as follows:
• 9 individuals who do not have any connection with the management or policy of a health care
provider or payer
• 2 physicians
• 2 payers
• 1 nursing home administrator in the State
• 1 non-physician health care practitioner
To the extent practicable, when appointing members to the Commission, the Governor ensures that at
least five members are residents of different counties with populations of 300,000 or more and at least
three members are residents of different counties with populations of less than 300,000. Of the three
members representing counties with fewer than 300,000 residents, at least one must be a resident of the
Eastern Shore; one must be a resident of Allegany, Garrett, Washington, Carroll, or Frederick County; and
one must be a resident of Southern Maryland.
Commissioner Biographies A short biography of each Commission member follows:
Andrew N. Pollak, MD, Chairman, earned his MD at Northwestern University School of Medicine. His
internship in general surgery and residency in orthopedic surgery were accomplished at the integrated
Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals of Cleveland Program. He went on to complete a
Executive Director
Center for Analysis
and Information
Systems
Center for Health
Information
Technology and
Innovative Care
Delivery
Center for
Quality
Measurement
and Reporting
Center for Health
Care Facilities
Planning and
Development
25
fellowship in orthopedic traumatology at University of California Davis Medical Center. Dr. Pollak is the
James Lawrence Kernan Professor of Orthopedics and Chair of the Department of Orthopedics within the
School of Medicine. He also serves as Chief of Orthopedics for the University of Maryland Medical
System. In the past, Dr. Pollak has served as Chair of the Board of Specialty Societies for the American
Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). He currently serves as Treasurer of the AAOS and is Past
President of the Orthopedic Trauma Association. Dr. Pollak is a former Chair of the Extremity War Injuries
Project Team for the AAOS, previously served as a Commissioner for the Maryland Health Care
Commission from 2004 to 2008, and is a former Past President of the Maryland Orthopedic Association.
His current responsibilities include Executive Committee Co-Chair for the Major Extremity Trauma
Research Consortium (METRC), Chair of the Publications Committee for METRC, Editor of the AAOS
Orange Book Series, Medical Director of the Baltimore County Fire Department, and Special Deputy US
Marshal. (Term Expires 9/30/2020)
Randolph S. Sergent, Vice Chairman, is Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for CareFirst BlueCross
BlueShield, where he has been employed since 2010. Prior to joining CareFirst, Mr. Sergent was a partner
at Venable LLP. Mr. Sergent also has served in the Maryland Attorney General’s Office as Deputy Counsel
to the Maryland Insurance Commissioner and as Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Litigation Division.
Mr. Sergent is a member of the Ethics Committee of the Maryland State Bar Association (MSBA)and has
served as Chair of the MSBA’s Health Law Section. Mr. Sergent holds a Juris Doctorate from the University
of Virginia School of Law, a Master of Science in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland,
College Park, and a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from the University of Virginia. Mr.
Sergent resides in Howard County. (Term Expires 9/30/2020)
Arun Bhandari, MD, is a practicing Oncologist and Hematologist at Chesapeake Oncology Hematology
Associates, PA (COHA), Annapolis, MD since 2007(an Oncology - Hematology private practice serving
citizens of Maryland since 1990). He is on staff at Anne Arundel Medical Center (AAMC), Baltimore
Washington Medical Center (BWMC), and John Hopkins Medicine at Howard County General Hospital
(HCGH). Dr. Bhandari is an Executive Board Member of The Maryland and District of Columbia Society of
Clinical Oncology, Inc. (MDCSCO), which plays a significant role to improve the quality and delivery of
cancer care in Maryland and the District of Columbia.
In 2018, Dr. Bhandari was appointed by Governor Hogan as a Council on the Maryland State Council on
Cancer Control, where he has a role to educate and advise government officials, public and private
organizations and the general public on comprehensive State policies and programs necessary to reduce
and control cancer incidence, mortality and morbidity among Marylanders. In 2016, Governor Hogan
appointed Dr. Bhandari on The Maryland Board of Physicians.
Dr. Bhandari completed fellowship in Hematology-Oncology from Georgetown University
Hospital/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC with bone marrow transplant rotation at the
National Institute of Health (NIH- NHLBI), Bethesda, MD. He served as a Chief fellow in Hematology &
Oncology from 2004-2005. He was a fellow in Hematology & Oncology at The University of Tennessee
Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, and NCCN Member Institution.
Cassandra Boyer works at the US Army Communications Electronics Command (CECOM) at the Aberdeen
Proving Ground, Maryland. She currently serves as the point person coordinating the Software
Engineering Center’s Human Capital Program. Past roles have included Executive Officer, Corporate
Communications, and the CECOM Commander’s Initiatives Group. Prior to her employment with the US
26
Army, Ms. Boyer held several positions in public affairs, including Director of Communications for
Coventry Health Care of Delaware and Director of Advocacy for the American Lung Association. Ms. Boyer
lives in Havre de Grace, MD, and serves her community as a member of the Havre de Grace City Council.
She is a graduate of Ursinus College with additional study at Johns Hopkins University and the College of
Notre Dame. (Term Expires 9/30/2023)
Marcia L. Boyle is the founder of the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF), the national nonprofit patient
organization dedicated to improving the diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life of persons with primary
immunodeficiency diseases through advocacy, education, and research (www.primaryimmune.org). She
served as president and CEO until her retirement in August 2017. She grew IDF from five volunteers in
1980 to an organization with approximately $10 million a year in revenue in 2017 and a full-time staff of
37. She was a co-founder of the International Patient Organization for Primary Immunodeficiencies,
which currently includes representation of patient organizations from 60 countries around the world. She
also served on the Board of Directors of the National Health Council from 2015 to 2017. She was honored
as a White House Champion of Change in Precision Medicine in 2015. (Term Expires 9/30/2022)
Martin L. “Chip” Doordan earned a Master of Arts in Health Care Administration from George Washington
University, a Master of Science from the University of Maryland, and a Bachelor of Science from Univ. of
Delaware. He has held positions in health care delivery for his entire career. Mr. Doordan served as CEO
and President of Anne Arundel Medical Center (AAMC) from 1994 to 2011 and as President from 1988
through 1994. He also directed the growth of AAMC from a community hospital to, by 2011, a regional
medical center with over 3,200 employees and an annual budget of over $550 million. He served in the
US Army from 1968 to 1971, including service in Vietnam from 1970 to 1971. (Term Expires 9/30/2022)
Margaret B. Hammersla, PhD, is an Assistant Professor and Senior Director for the DNP Program at
University of Maryland School of Nursing and an Adult Nurse Practitioner. Dr. Hammersla has worked in a
variety of clinical arenas including perioperative care, emergency medicine, long-term care, and dementia
management. She currently maintains a clinical practice in internal medicine in Eldersburg, Maryland. Dr.
Hammersla has had extensive experience in simulation development, interprofessional education, and
curriculum development. Dr. Hammersla was a member of a project to develop six simulation-based
learning experiences to provide health care students (medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dental, social work,
and law) with the opportunity to learn about each other’s disciplines as well as how to better
communicate utilizing a TEAMSTEPPS-based approach funded by the Maryland Higher Education
Commission. In addition, she has worked on many individual projects to provide students APRN programs
with interprofessional education opportunities with other schools on the UM Baltimore campus, such as
pharmacy and dental schools. Dr. Hammersla received her PhD, a post-master certificate in teaching in
nursing and health professions, and an MS Adult Nurse Practitioner from the University of Maryland,
Baltimore. (Term Expires 9/30/22)
Jason McCarthy, PharmD, is Vice President for Operations at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States. In his
role, Mr. McCarthy is responsible for ensuring that Kaiser Permanente is appropriately and effectively
aligned to implement high-quality care to its members throughout Maryland, Virginia, and the District of
Columbia. In addition, Mr. McCarthy is responsible for overseeing Kaiser Permanente’s growth in the
Baltimore service area, which currently includes ~500 employees and 10 medical office buildings that
service 125,000 members.
27
From 2014 to 2016, Mr. McCarthy served as the Regional Pharmacy Director for Kaiser Permanente of the
Mid-Atlantic States, with oversight of 29 pharmacies, a mail-order facility, infusion services, and a wide
range of pharmacy support functions. Prior to joining Kaiser, Mr. McCarthy served as a District Manager
with CVS Pharmacy in the Washington, DC, metro area. He was accountable for the District’s operational
performance, total store revenue, customer service, expense control, and asset management.
Mr. McCarthy received his Doctor of Pharmacy from Howard University College of Pharmacy in 2002 and
his MBA from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2016. He currently resides in Bowie, Maryland,
with his wife and daughter. (Term Expires 9/30/2024)
Jeffrey Metz, MBA, LNHA, is President and Administrator of Egle Nursing and Rehab Center located in
Lonaconing, Maryland. He is also a founding partner in Foundation, Rehab, an affiliate of Egle that
provides long-term-care rehabilitation services. Mr. Metz previously served as Vice-Chair for the
Maryland State Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Administrators. A graduate of Frostburg State
University, he has a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting and a master's degree in business
administration. Mr. Metz resides in Allegany County. (Term Expires 9/30/2022)
Gerard S. O’Connor, MD, is a surgeon in private practice in Chestertown, Maryland. In addition to his
private practice, Dr. O’Connor has served as Chief of the Medical Staff and Chief of Surgery at Chester
River Hospital Center, now University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Chestertown. Dr. O’Connor
received his undergraduate medical education at Georgetown University and completed a residency in
general surgery at George Washington University. Dr. O’Connor brings to the Commission the perspective
of a physician who serves a rural Maryland community. (Term Expires 9/30/2023)
Michael J. O’Grady, PhD, is a Principal of O’Grady Health Policy LLC, a private health consulting firm, and a
Senior Fellow at the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago. His current
research is concentrated on the interaction between scientific development and health economics, with a
particular concentration on diabetes and obesity.
From 2003 to 2005, he was the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at the US Department of
Health and Human Services. Dr. O’Grady worked directly with the Secretary on such critical policy issues
as implementing the new Medicare drug benefit. Prior to his Senate confirmation as the Assistant
Secretary, he served as a senior health advisor to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and a
senior health economist at the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. Dr. O’Grady also held
senior staff positions with the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission and the Congressional Research
Service at the Library of Congress.
Dr. O’Grady also serves on a number of commissions and boards, including the National Committee on
Vital and Health Statistics and the Board of Directors of the Patient Access Network and AcademyHealth.
He received his PhD in political science from the University of Rochester. Dr. O'Grady resides in
Montgomery County. (Term Expires 9/30/2023)
Martha G. Rymer is the partner/owner of Rymer & Associates PA, located in Calvert County, Maryland.
She has been a professional in the practice since 1998. Prior to joining the practice, she was the Chief
Financial Officer at Calvert Memorial Hospital for 13 years. Ms. Rymer has brought to the practice her
extensive knowledge of health care. In addition, Ms. Rymer works with a wide variety of business clients
in the construction, printing, real estate, restaurant, and retail industries. In addition to tax preparation,
28
she also consults on business practice management issues and assists various businesses with analysis of
financial performance and planning. In addition to her responsibilities running her business, she is the
Treasurer of her local Chamber of Commerce and on the finance committee of the local hospice and her
church. Ms. Rymer graduated from Mount Saint Mary’s University in 1983 with a BS degree in accounting.
She is a certified public accountant licensed in the State of Maryland. (Term Expires 9/30/2021)
Stephen B. Thomas, PhD, is the director of the Maryland Center for Health Equity in the University of
Maryland School of Public Health and a professor of health services administration at the school. Dr.
Thomas is an internationally recognized African American leader in minority health research and
community engagement, and he has been a lead investigator of multiple studies investigating racial
differences in health outcomes. Dr. Thomas resides in Prince George’s County. (Term Expires 9/30/2021)
Marcus L. Wang, Esq., is the Co-Founder, President, and General Manager of the Baltimore-based
ZytoGen Global Genetics Institute, a CAP-accredited genetics testing company driving successful
pregnancy outcomes for patients worldwide through its proprietary preimplantation genetic screening
platform. Previously, he practiced corporate law at the Manhattan office of DLA Piper, as well as in China,
where he spearheaded the development, execution, and launch of UnderArmour’s China market entry in
2011.
Currently, Mr. Wang sits on the President’s Roundtable at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, joining a
select group of senior advisors to the President. In addition, he sits on the Board of Visitors at the
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law as Co-Chair of the Development Committee. He
is also the founder of the Leadership Scholars Legacy Endowment, a scholarship fund for deserving
students, and serves on the Board of Trustees at Gilman School, as well as the Board of Directors for the
Baltimore County Revenue Authority.
Mr. Wang earned a BA cum laude from Harvard University, and a JD from the University of Maryland,
Francis King Carey School of Law. Mr. Wang also holds a Certificate in International and Comparative
Business Law from the Central University of Finance and Economics in Beijing, and a Certificate in
Genetics and Genomics from Stanford University.
29
Appendix B: Tables of Certificates of Need Reviewed, Approved, or Changed in FY 2019
Table 6: Certificate of Need Applications Reviewed in FY 2019
Project Sponsor Location Description of Project Estimated
Cost of
Project
Final Action
Visiting Nurse
Association of
Maryland, LLC
Dorchester Co. Expand the service area of
an existing home health
agency (HHA) to include
Dorchester County
$47,000 Conditional
Approval
Joseph Richey House,
Inc. t/a Gilchrist
Center Baltimore
Baltimore City Relocate and replace a
hospice inpatient facility
$10,328,950 Approval
Children’s Hospital Prince
George’s Co.
Establish an ambulatory
surgical facility
$10,400,000 Conditional
Approval
Brinton Woods
Health and
Rehabilitation at
Winfield
Carroll Co. Relocate a comprehensive
care facility (CCF or nursing
home)
$14,837,500 Conditional
Approval
UM St. Joseph
Medical Center
Baltimore Co. Replacement of surgical
facilities
$60,000,000 Conditional
Approval
Adventist Home
Health Services
Frederick Co. Expand the service area of
an existing HHA to include
Frederick County
$75,000 Conditional
Approval
Amedisys Home
Health
Frederick Co. Expand the service area of
an existing HHA to include
Frederick County
$40,000 Conditional
Approval
Bayada Home Health
Care
Allegany,
Frederick,
Garrett, and
Washington
Counties
Expand the service area of
an existing HHA to include
Allegany, Frederick, Garrett,
and Washington Counties
$0 Conditional
Approval
Hope House
Treatment Centers
Prince
George’s Co.
Establish an alcoholism and
drug abuse intermediate
care facility
$0 Approval
Amedisys Maryland Prince
George’s Co.
Expand the service area of
an existing general hospice
to include Prince George’s
County
$38,000 Conditional
Approval
30
Bayada Home Health
Care
Prince
George’s Co.
Establish a general hospice
authorized to serve Prince
George’s County
$131,000 Conditional
Approval
Montgomery Hospice Prince
George’s Co.
Expand the service area of
an existing general hospice
to include Prince George’s
County
$1,482,515 Conditional
Approval
P-B Health Home
Care Agency
Prince
George’s Co.
Establish a general hospice
authorized to serve Prince
George’s County
$105,000 Conditional
Approval
Adventist
Rehabilitation
Hospital
Montgomery
Co.
Relocation of a special
rehabilitation hospital
$19,547,323 Conditional
Approval
Atlantic General
Hospital
Worcester Co. Establishment of an
ambulatory surgical facility
$8,023,827 Approval
Peninsula Regional
Medical Center
Wicomico Co. Introduce child and
psychiatric hospital services
$8,520,716 Approval
University of
Maryland Medical
Center
Baltimore City Introduce adolescent
psychiatric hospital services
$9,580,000 Approval
31
Table 7: Exemptions from Certificate of Need Review Completed in FY 2019
Project Sponsor Location Description of Project Estimated
Cost of
Project
Final
Action
University of Maryland
(UM) Capital Region
Health d/b/a UM Laurel
Regional Hospital
Prince
George’s Co.
Conversion of a general
hospital to a freestanding
medical facility (FMF) with
ambulatory surgical capacity
$53,225,855 Approval
Adventist HealthCare
(AHC) Shady Grove
Medical Center (SGMC)
and AHC Washington
Adventist Hospital
Montgomery
Co.
Consolidate acute psychiatric
bed capacity (except for 10
beds at replacement hospital
under development in Silver
Spring) at SGMC
$3,400,000 Approval
Summit Ambulatory
Surgery Center
Anne Arundel
Co.
Add a second operating room $25,000 Approval
UM Shore Health d/b/a
UM Shore Medical Center
at Dorchester
Dorchester
Co.
Convert a general hospital to
an FMF
$38,497,006 Approval
UM Shore Health System
d/b/a UM Shore Medical
Center at Dorchester and
UM Shore Medical Center
at Easton
Talbot Co. Consolidate acute psychiatric
hospital services of two
general hospitals
$5,178,535 Approval
32
Table 8: Changes to Approved Certificates of Need Reviewed in FY 2019
Project Sponsor Location Description of Project Estimated Cost of
Project
Final Action
Adventist
HealthCare (AHC)
d/b/a
Washington
Adventist
Hospital
Montgomery
Co.
Add development of an
acute psychiatric
program (10 beds) for
adults at the replacement
hospital under
development in Silver
Spring
$3,300,000 Approval
[One surviving
condition from
original CON]
Coastal Hospice
and Palliative
Care
Wicomico
Co.
Increase in the approved
cost of a new building
project
$579,315 (yielding
a new total
approved project
cost of
$8,577,429)
Approval
Stella Maris Baltimore Co. Increase in the approved
cost of a new building
project
$4,024,479
(yielding a new
total approved
project cost of
$33,716,305)
Approval
[Two surviving
conditions from
original CON]
Suburban
Hospital
Montgomery
Co.
Void CON condition
requiring termination of
cardiac surgery services if
case volume declines
below 200 cases per year
$0 Approval
[Conforms this
long-established
program with
current SHP
standard]
Western
Maryland
Regional Medical
Center
Allegany Co. Void CON condition
requiring termination of
cardiac surgery services if
case volume declines
below 200 cases per year
$0 Approval
[Conforms this
long-established
program with
current SHP
standard]
Anne Arundel
Mental Health
Hospital
Anne
Arundel Co.
Increase in the approved
cost of a new special
psychiatric hospital
$3,300,763
(yielding a new
total approved
cost of
$28,285,558)
Approval
33
Table 9: Certificates of Ongoing Performance for Cardiac Surgery in FY 2019
Hospital Location Cardiovascular
Service
Final Action
AHC Washington
Adventist Hospital
Montgomery Co. Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
Western Maryland
Regional Medical Center
Allegany Co. Cardiac surgery Approval through 2022
Peninsula Regional
Medical Center
Wicomico Co. Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
UM St. Joseph Medical
Center
Baltimore Co. Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
University of Maryland
Medical Center
Baltimore City Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
Sinai Hospital of
Baltimore
Baltimore City Cardiac surgery Approval through 2022
The Johns Hopkins
Hospital
Baltimore City Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
MedStar Union Memorial
Hospital
Baltimore City Cardiac surgery Approval through 2023
34
Appendix C: Brief Descriptions of Short-Term Legislative Directed Projects Active in Fiscal Year 2019
Physician Maintenance of Certification Workgroup In 2018, the Chair of the House Health and Government Operations Committee requested that the
Commission convene a workgroup to study physician maintenance of certification requirements. The
Commission convened a workgroup of key stakeholders and conducted a study on this issue. The
Commission submitted a final letter summarizing the findings of the study and the recommendations of
the Commission in November 2018.
Certificate of Need Modernization Taskforce In 2017, the Chairs of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Health and Government Operations
Committee requested that the Commission review Certificate of Need application requirements and
processes in the State, including alignment with the Total Cost of Care Model. The Commission convened
a taskforce to review this topic, which operated during calendar year 2018. An interim report was
submitted to the legislative committees in June 2018, and a final report was submitted in December
2018.
EMS Reimbursement for New Delivery Models Senate Bill 682 (2018) required the Commission and the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical
Services Systems (MIEMSS) to convene a workgroup on EMS reimbursement for three new care delivery
models. The Commission and MIEMSS worked closely with other State agencies to study the issue and
convened the required workgroup to gather input from stakeholders. A final report on this topic was
submitted in January 2019.
Health Record and Payment Integration Program Advisory Committee Senate Bill 896 (2018) required the Commission to establish a Health Record and Payment Integration
Program Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee was tasked with conducting a health information
technology policy study to assess the feasibility of creating a health record and payment integration
program that could incorporate administrative health care claim transactions into the State-Designated
Health Information Exchange (HIE). The Commission submitted the final report of this Advisory
Committee to the Governor and the General Assembly in May 2019.
Electronic Prescription Records System—Assessment and Report House Bill 115 (2018), Maryland Health Care Commission—Electronic Prescription Records System—
Assessment and Report, required the Commission to convene a workgroup of interested stakeholders to
conduct a health information technology policy study that assesses the benefits and feasibility of
developing an electronic system for health care providers to access patient prescription medication
history. More than 81 stakeholders representing a broad array of interests participated in the study. The
final report was submitted to the General Assembly in July 2019.
School-Based Telehealth Workgroup In 2018, the Senate Finance Committee requested that the Commission convene a workgroup to identify
deficiencies in existing policies related to school-based telehealth programs and develop an approach for
improving these policies, which may be statutory, regulatory, or technical in nature. The Commission was
required to report on the workgroup’s findings and provide legislative and regulatory recommendations,
35
including associated budget estimates for programs the State should undertake to improve the delivery of
school-based telehealth services. The Commission submitted to the Senate Finance Committee an interim
report from this workgroup in January 2019 and a final report in October 2019.
Study of Mortality Rates of African American Infants and Infants in Rural Areas Senate Bill 266 (2018) required the Commission, in consultation with the Office of Minority Health and
Health Disparities, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, the Vital Statistics Administration, and
interested stakeholders, to conduct a study regarding the mortality rates of African American infants and
infants in rural areas. The Commission convened a workgroup made up of diverse stakeholders and
contracted with the School of Public Health at the University of Maryland to conduct the study. A final
report was submitted to the Senate Finance Committee and the House Health and Government
Operations Committee in November 2019.
Study of Proposed Mandated Health Insurance Services: EMS Treat and Release Programs, EMS Alternative Destination Programs, and EMS Mobile Integrated Health Programs In 2018, the Senate Finance Committee and House Health and Government Operations Committee
requested, under the authority of Insurance Article §15-1501, that the Commission assess the social,
medical, and financial impact of establishing a mandate for covering alternative destination treatment
programs, treat-and-release programs, and mobile integrated health programs in the fully insured private
health insurance market in Maryland. The Commission submitted a final report on this topic to these
legislative committees in December 2019.
Assessment of Service Changes at the University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Chestertown Senate Bill 1010 (2019) and the Joint Conference Report for House Bill 100 (2019) required the
Commission to conduct an assessment of service changes at the University of Maryland Shore Medical
Center at Chestertown. The Commission conducted this assessment in close collaboration with the Health
Services Cost Review Commission and the Office of Health Care Quality in the Maryland Department of
Health. In addition, the Commission contracted with the Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis at NORC
to conduct a complementary study on options for rural health care delivery in Maryland. The Commission
submitted final reports for both the Assessment required by law and the study of rural health care
delivery options in January 2020.
4160 Patterson Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21215
Toll Free: 1 (877) 245-1762
TTY Number: 1-800-735-2258
Fax (410) 358-1236
https://mhcc.maryland.gov/