MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Transcript of MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
District-wide Planning
Create vision for districtFoundation and leadershipUse of resourcesInternal expertiseEnsure sustainability
Leadership Team
FundingVisibility Political
Support
Training Coaching Evaluation
Active Coordination
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
SWPBS Organizational Logic
٭
District Coordinator
External Coaches
Secondary School Teams
SALINA SWPBS DISTRICT ORGANIZATION
External Coaches
External Coaches
School Coaches
School Coaches
School Coaches
School Team
School Team
School Team
Current District PBIS Team
District coordinatorDistrict and building administratorsProfessionals representing curriculum and instruction Safe and drug free representationProfessional development Bus system leadershipMental health professionalsFamily membersStudentsSpecial education cooperativeInteragency partners (court services, mental health,
developmental disability services, children and family services, etc.)
What Progress has the District Made in Implementing PBIS?
Training for all schools to use the School-wide Information System (SWIS) 3 schools at tier 2 9 schools at tier 1
District Coordinator meetings occur regularly Linda Benjamin has been shadowing Project Stay professionals to
learn more about how the SIT training systems at the district level may benefit
Individuals within the district are participating in the Kansas Institute for PBS Tier 3 individualize planning across home, school and community Tier 3 Interagency event in the works for spring, 2010
District-level Progress (Continued)
Three PBIS District Newsletters Board presentations on PBIS Visits from outside school districtsInteragency meetings started to begin building Tier
3 capacityDistrict 3 year action plan for PBIS is in place
Are Schools Implementing PBIS?
Self-Assessment Data EBS Survey Results Oregon School Safety Survey, Action Plans, Office Discipline Referral Data
Effective Behavior Support Survey Team Implementation Checklist Data Annual action plans for each school School-wide Information System (SWIS) Data
Average referrals per day per month By time By location By student By problem behavior
School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Outcome Data
Self Assessment Summary
Team Implementation Checklist results show 8 out of the 12 school teams are at 80% overall implementation,
There is a 68% increase in the number of surveys completed by staff, students, parents and community members between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
There was a 16.6% decrease in the perceived risk factors across the USD 305 schools between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
There was a 3.3% increase in perceived protective factors across the USD 305 Schools between the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
Training and Support
All 12 buildings are receiving implementation support
Coaches meetings occur monthly to support schools
External coaches are now completing the SET in schools they are not supporting directly
All 12 buildings are implementing school-wide PBS in varying degrees
Targeted and intensive individual positive behavior support is being implemented at Heusner and Stewart
Training and Technical Assistance
Tier 1 Training All buildings district wide 2008-09
Advanced Tier 1 Training All buildings district wide 2008-09 (Except CHS)
Tier 2 Training Central High School, Heusner Elementary School,
Stewart Elementary School 2008-09
Tier 3 On site Support Central High School Fall 2009
Why Create Inter-rater Agreement for the SET?
Avoid “we’re doing MTSS for behavior” Provide consistent responses to school teams Build capacity of district personnel to guide PBIS/MTSS
process Link district data to state PBS Kansas
Districts participating are working on plan to unify data
Consistency between all state district coordinators and SET implementers
Districts understand they are implementing PBIS---there is evidence via inter-rater agreement
Inter-rater Agreement on the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
1 District Coordinator + 3 External Coaches Reliable with 1 Benchmark Person;
Proportion of Agreement: Formula = [Number of Agreements/ (Agreements + Disagreements)] x 100%
Inter-Rater Agreement on SET for Reliable Raters
# of Reliable Raters in District
SETs Completed Inter-rater
Process
Average Agreement Across
All SETs
Reliability RangeAcross
Features
4 3 SETs in USD305
97.63% 66.7% - 100%Across
Features
Inter-rater agreement is achieved if the person scores 3 SETS with 80% or higher agreement with the benchmark inter-rater reliability agreement person.
Internal vs. External Evaluation of the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET): Example of First Steps
Inter-rater Agreement System at the Salina School District District PBS Coordinator and Lead Inter-rater (Shonda)
completes the SET and compares scores SET inter-rater agreement with External Coaches (complete) Starting together with Shonda for SET Continuing inter-rater agreement with Mary Beth (25% of all
SETs completed) External coaches obtain agreement with district coordinator Data on inter-rater agreement is reported at the district level
External Evaluation: Show SET data are consistent with People Outside the District
Invite an expert to review PBIS data and training systems and provide guidance
Establish inter-rater agreement with others outside the district Other PBS District Coordinators Shonda
Examples of Decreases in ODRs Reported by School Teams
School #7 implemented a teacher mentor program last spring and data shows that last years ODR’s were 593 to date and this year’s are 438 which is a 26% decrease in ODR’s.
School #6 implemented a program to reinforce their expectations taught and their ODR’s dropped from 96 to 58 to date which is a 39% decrease in ODR’s.
Faculty, Staff, Students, Families and Community Stakeholders
There is a 68% increase in the number of surveys completed by Staff, students, parents and community members between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
There was a 16.6% decrease in the perceived risk factors across the USD305 schools between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
There was a 3.3% increase in perceived protective factors across the USD305 Schools between the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years.
Policy Impact
Integrating district team for academics and behavior
Website created to share information formally with community
Board meeting presentationsEvaluation plan for MTSS for Behavior
Draft document for review
District Capacity Building
2009-10 the district is working on identifying trainers who will continue providing Tier 1 training
A District tertiary team planning process is now in progress to
Identify how to work smarter not harder with existing school personnel who support students who engage in serious problem behavior
Identify trainers for Tiers 2 and 3 who can support Student Improvement Teams onsite
Discuss how to collaborate with Project Stay by partnering when individual plans are being facilitated
Set the stage for internal district curriculum to support PBIS training on an ongoing basis