Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)
-
Upload
angus-hobson -
Category
Documents
-
view
247 -
download
0
Transcript of Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)
![Page 1: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MARKET SEGMENTATION AND ENGAGEMENT
![Page 2: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MARKET SEGMENTATION• Multiple mechanisms
– Physical (scale, location, enterprise mix, etc)– Demographic (age, gender, family status, etc)– Behavioural (collaborative / individual, passive / active, etc)– Skills / capability level– Motivational (speed, price, innovation, profit, etc)
• Multiple considerations– Value-adding potential in each segment– Relative “importance” of each segment (financial / non-financial) – Capacity and pain:gain ratio in collating associated information– Tying into the / a “product development” pipeline
![Page 3: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PRODUCER SEGMENTATION AND ENGAGEMENT
Innovators(2.5%)
EarlyAdopters(13.5%)
Early Majority(34%)
Late Majority(34%) Late /
non-adopters (16%)
DECREASING SPEED AND/OR LEVEL OF INNOVATION / INNOVATIVE CAPACITY
LEAD USERMARKET
MAJORITY MARKET LATE / NON-ADOPTER MARKET
![Page 4: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PRODUCER SEGMENTATION AND ENGAGEMENT
Innovators(2.5%)
EarlyAdopters(13.5%)
Early Majority(34%)
Late Majority(34%) Late /
non-adopters (16%)
= ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT = PASSIVE ENGAGEMENT
LEAD USER PROGRAM
FOCUS: GENERATION AND VALIDATION OF NEW
INNOVATIONS
MAJORITY MARKET PROGRAMS(MBfP, MMfS, GIG, etc)
FOCUS: DEMONSTRATION, COMMERCIALISATION AND ADOPTION OF VALIDATED RESEARCH
LOW / MINIMALENGAGEMENT
FOCUS: GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS
![Page 5: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“MAJORITY MARKET” PROGRAMS
• Principles format – sector messages, local customisation• Co-investment and integrated delivery• Resources proportional to herd / flock distribution • Producer Advocate network• Awareness, KASA and practice change activities• M&E framework
SECTOR NAME STATE OF DEVELOPMENTSOUTHERN BEEF More Beef from Pastures SHEEPMEAT Making More from Sheep GOATS Going into Goats NORTHERN BEEF FutureBEEF (TBC)
![Page 6: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SERVICING THE MARKET • Consultative mechanism for collating RD&E
needs / ideas / issues• Communication & research adoption
framework – Events, field days, workshops– Communication tools and systems (newsletters,
web resources, – Validation / demonstration activities and network– Monitoring and evaluation
• Supporting resources ($, CRM, Key Account Managers, etc)
![Page 7: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Needs a value proposition for producers to be involved• Must recognise confidentiality and commercial interests• Is NOT related to enterprise scale
– “large producer” activities would straddle lead user and major market• Key account management via agribusiness• “Executive Link” / peer group liaison
• Will require an effective consultation network / process– Face-to-face or electronic meetings? How frequently?– Subject-specific or “generic” innovation
• Needs to ensure it doesn’t attract an “exclusive” tag• Likely to be a unique MLA initiative
– Minimal scope or mandate for DPI interest (not under NRDES) • Will require budget and internal resources to manage – origin and who?
“LEAD USER” ENGAGEMENT
![Page 8: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
THE RD&E PIPELINE
STRATEGIC BASICRESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION
PROOF-OF-CONCEPT“BLUE SKY” CONCEPT TOMARKET READY
DELIVERY TO (TARGET) MARKET
R&D HORIZON
HORIZON 1(> 5 YEARS)
HORIZON 2(2-5 YEARS)
HORIZON 1(<2 YEARS)
![Page 9: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
RESEA
RC
H A
DO
PTION
WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT?
COMMUNICATION & EVALUATION
SOUTHERN PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY
NORTHERN PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY
STRA
TEGIC
SCIEN
CE
NRM AH&W
STRATEGIC BASICRESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION
![Page 10: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
RESEA
RC
H A
DO
PTION
WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT?
COMMUNICATION & EVALUATION
SOUTHERN PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY
NORTHERN PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY
STRA
TEGIC
SCIEN
CE
NRM AH&W
STRATEGIC BASICRESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION
LEAD USERPROGRAM
MAJORITYMARKET
PROGRAM
![Page 11: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
STRATEGIC BASICRESEARCH PHASE
APPLIED RESEARCH PHASE
DEVELOPMENTPHASE
EXTENSIONPHASE
RESULT IF SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE PLATFORM PROOF-OF-CONCEPT MARKET READY PRODUCT AWARENESS/SKILLS/ADOPTION
TIME HORIZON > 5 YEARS 2 – 5 YEARS < 2 YEARS 3+ YEARS
CATEGORY OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTCOME
EX-AN
TE EVALU
ATIO
N
(BEFO
RE EA
CH
PHA
SE)
QU
AN
TITATIVE
NPV / IRR / BCR N/A
QU
ALITA
TIVE
RER
MARKET ANALYSIS
RESEARCHER ANALYSIS
EX-POST EVA
LUA
TION
(A
FTER EA
CH
PHA
SE)
QU
AN
TITATIVE
FOCUS • System impacts• Enterprise / business
changes
• Enterprise, business and industry impacts
• Supply-demand impact
• Enterprise / business impacts of adopters versus industry average
• Management practices• Knowledge, skills and confidence
METHOD • Modelling• Case studies and/or
Producer Validation Sites
• Frontier analysis • Farm-level and DREAM
modelling
• Pre / post analysis in category B & C participants (including Producer Demonstration Sites)
QU
ALITA
TIVE
FOCUS• Researcher peer review• Production of knowledge /
papers
• Researcher and/or lead user peer review
• Definition of target market and size
• Beta testing
• Target user KSC and practice change levels
• Producer and provider satisfaction levels
METHOD• Researcher / research
organisation surveys / interviews
• Researcher / research organisation / lead user surveys / interviews
• Market research surveys
with “lead users” and advisors
• Target market surveys• Participant and non-participant
comparisons
3.1 – 3.4 – 4.1 – 4.2 – 4.3 5.1 – 5.3STRATEGIC PLAN NODES
![Page 12: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CONSIDERATIONS• Objectives:
– Stakeholder satisfaction: targeted, timely, relevant engagement– Internal processes: more efficient…
• Generation of research ideas• Evaluation of investment value• Completion and validation of R&D• Extension to target market(s)
• Cultural change and systems (CRM, KM) will be required • Two-tiered approach
– RD&E pipeline / program development strategy– Stakeholder segmentation and target engagement
• This should help not hinder our RD&E pipeline efforts– Better delineation of roles, responsibilities and accountabilities according
to skill sets– Better definition of target markets
![Page 13: Market segmentation and engagement (Nov 2010)](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58eceba81a28ab8d308b46e1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
END