Mark Anderson, Meriel FitzPatrick & Jason Truscott.
-
Upload
lucas-bennett -
Category
Documents
-
view
235 -
download
4
Transcript of Mark Anderson, Meriel FitzPatrick & Jason Truscott.
Mark Anderson, Meriel FitzPatrick & Jason Truscott
“any arena or zone within a subject where supervised learning can take place via
first-hand experience, outside the constraints of the four-walls classroom
setting”
Lonergan & Andresen, 1988
“Fieldwork gives opportunities for learning which cannot be duplicated in the
classroom. It greatly enhances students’ understanding of geographical features and concepts, and allows students to
develop specific as well as general skills”
HMI 1992
Fieldwork is good (Boyle et al. 2003;Boyle et al. 2007)
Positive /direct benefits to students (Fuller et al. 2003)
Advantage over lectures as it is “real” (Warburton & Higgett, 1997)
Not universally perceived positively by students (Stokes, 2007)
‘Novelty factor’ / ‘Novelty space’ (Falk et al. 1978; Orion & Hofstein 1994)
Maskall & Stokes, 2008
Promote independence Increase confidence in their own abilities Peer Assisted Learning Pressures of time & costs
Sandway Cellar
University
Kingsand-Cawsand
Lab+ Paper copies – guide, maps, timetables
etc. Risk Assessment Access to website Hand specimens of all rock types found
at Sandway Cellar Training for the PDAs
Website Link
The maps are programmed so certain ‘events’ are triggered when entering a pre-defined location on the map.
The whole environment is termed a ‘Mediascape’
You are here!
Programmedtrigger areas
For example:When you enterhere.
This eventhappens!
Site 1
For example:When you enterhere.
This eventhappens!
Site 5
Engagement – or lack of.
Technology - breakdown
Changing outcrop pattern of rock
Weather
Questionnaires (3 areas): Preparation (Lab+ and website) During the fieldtrip Use of the technology (PDA)
Likert Scale and YES/NO answers
Some questions required free text to suggest how the fieldtrip and resources could be improved.
Interviews (semi-structured)
Stage 1 students – March Questionnaires Interviews
Stage 2 students – June Questionnaires Intended cohort for
Peer Assisted Learningin subsequent year
•Few students engaged•Positive response to the use of the PDA
•Most students engaged•Only 2/8 PDAs worked consistently and well•Positive response “when it works”
Stage 1 students Majority engaged Independent (in groups of 4-6) No Stage 2 mentors Run as part of a tutorial and fieldwork
module Weather OK PDAs worked well On-line questionnaire
Feedback – generally very positive
Question 9 – Did you attend the introductory session to using the PDA before you went on the fieldtrip?
92.6% replied Yes . They took part in the introduction to the PDAs in Labplus
Question 10 – If yes, after having completed the fieldwork please explain how you think this exercise helped you with using the PDA in the field.
'Gave general idea of how to access the software and navigate through screens.’
'it meant we could get on with the work in the field quicker and the was less confusion’
'It introduced us to the way in which the PDA worked and showed us the importance of patience when using them.’
‘It made me familiar with equipment which was usefull’
Question 11“Instructions on the PDA were clear”
Glare on screens Add the other routes to Kingsand on to the
PDA. Make the PDAs work on the coastal path
Put hints onto slides PDA was a useful addition to learning in
the field but is not as good as the one to one interaction with the staff.
Develop links to specific web pages – for help and advice, answering questions.
Screen – use a Tablet PC.
Develop the Peer Assisted aspect to involve Stage 2 students as mentors.
Stage 1 cohort 2009
Stage 2 cohort 2009
Stage 1 cohort 2010
Stage 2 cohort 2010PAEL
Stage 1 cohort 2009
Stage 2 cohort 2010Independent mapping
Stage 2 cohort 2010PAEL
Boyle, A., Conchie, S., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., Turner, A., & Wurthmann, S. (2003). Fieldwork is Good? The Student Experience of Field Courses. Planet, Special Edition, 5, 48-51
Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., Turner, A., Wurthmann, S. & Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is Good: the Student Perception and the Affective Domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31 (2), 299-317
Falk, J., Martin, W., & Balling, J.(1978) The novel field trip phenomenon: adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(2), 127-134
Fuller, I., Gaskin, S. & Scott, I., (2003). Student perceptions of Geography and Environmental Science fieldwork in the light of restricted access to the field, caused by Foot and Mouth Disease in the UK in 2001. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27, 79-102
Maskall, J. & Stokes, A. (2008). Designing Effective Fieldwork for the Environmental and Natural Sciences. GEES Subject Centre, Learning and Teaching Guide
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A., (1994). Factors that Influence Learning during a Scientific Field Trip in a Natural Environment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119
Warburton, J. & Higgitt, M., (1997). Improving the Preparation for Fieldwork with IT: two examples from physical geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 333-347
Stokes, A., (2007) It there a future for fieldwork? [on-line] Available: http://staff.plymouth.ac.uk//cetlexp/fieldwork/intranet.htm (date accessed 19th June 2007)