Mark A. Newbrough, MD Medical Director, Blue Ridge PACE Assoc. Prof., Section Head for Geriatrics...
-
Upload
emory-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Mark A. Newbrough, MD Medical Director, Blue Ridge PACE Assoc. Prof., Section Head for Geriatrics...
PACE: Program for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
Mark A. Newbrough, MDMedical Director, Blue Ridge PACE
Assoc. Prof., Section Head for GeriatricsUniversity of Virginia
DisclosureBlue Ridge PACE is a new program
serving Charlottesville, and surrounding counties of Albemarle, Fluvanna, Louisa, Greene, and Nelson
I am medical director for Blue Ridge PACEUVA, JABA, and Riverside Health Systems
are partners in Blue Ridge PACE
ObjectivesDescribe the key aspects of the PACE
model of careDescribe the proven benefits of the PACE
model of careExplain the basic components of how the
PACE Interdisciplinary Team interacts with other providers, including inpatient providers to comprehensively meet the needs of frail older adults
Mr. JonesMr. Jones is an 87 year old patient that has seen
you in your practice for the past 8 years. His 54 year old daughter provides 24 hour care for him in her home. She has had to quit her job, and her marriage is threatened by the demands of caregiving. She is no longer able to take her father out to church, and despite the fact that you have worked tirelessly with the social worker to provide additional support for the patient and his family, she fears that she may have to place her father in a nursing home. She asks if you know anything about the new PACE program here in town.
What is PACE?According to CMS website:
Medicare program for older adults and people over age 55 living with disabilities
Provides community-based care and services to people who otherwise need nursing home level of care
Created to provide participants, families, caregivers, and health professionals flexibility to meet the health needs of participants and help them to continue living in the community
Care is provided and coordinated by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) of health professionals
CMS “Quick Facts” (cont.)PACE provides all the care and services covered
by Medicare and Medicaid, as authorized by the IDT, “as well as additional medically-necessary care and services not covered by Medicare and Medicaid”.
True “participant centered care”PACE programs are provider sponsored health
plans: “This means your PACE doctor and other care providers are also the people who work with you to make decisions about your care.”
Preventive care is covered and encouraged
PACE Services include:Primary care (including
physician and nursing care)
Hospital CareMedical Specialty
ServicesPrescription DrugsNursing Home CareEmergency ServicesHome CarePhysical TherapyOccupational Therapy
Adult Day CareRecreational TherapyMealsDentistryNutritional CounselingSocial ServicesLaboratory / X-ray
servicesSocial Work
CounselingTransportation
Who is Eligible for PACE?Age 55 and olderLong term nursing care eligible (but only
7% of PACE participants nationally actually live in nursing homes)
Live in a PACE service areaAble to live safely in the community at the
time of enrollment in PACE
Long Term Nursing EligibilityUAI: Uniform Assessment InstrumentCriteria:1. Dependent in 2-4 ADL’s
• PLUS semi-dependent OR dependent in behavior AND orientation
• PLUS semi-dependent in joint motion OR medication administration
2. Dependent in 5-7 ADL’s• PLUS dependent in mobility
3. Semi-dependent in 2-7 ADL’s• PLUS dependent in mobility• PLUS dependent in behavior AND orientation
History of PACE (NPA website)On Lok (Cantonese for “peaceful, happy abode”)
1971: Outlined as comprehensive system of care based on the British day hospital model1973: Opens one of the nation’s first adult centers in
San Francisco1974: Begins receiving Medicaid reimbursement for adult cay health services
PACE History (cont.)1975: Adds social day care center and includes in-home care, home-delivered meals and housing assistance program1979: 4 year Dept. of HHS grant to develop a consolidated model of delivering care to person with long term care needs1983: Develops new financing system that pays a fixed per member per month payment1986: Federal legislation extends new financing system and allows 10 additional organizations to replicate mode
PACE History (cont.)1986: Federal legislation extends new financing system and allows 10 additional organizations to replicate model1987: Robert Wood Johnson support1990: First PACE programs received Medicare and Medicaid waivers to operate the program1997: Balance Budget Act of 1997 establishes PACE model as permanently recognized provider type under Medicare and Medicaid programs
1997 Review (1)Findings:
In 1995, PACE fully operational in 11 cities, nine states
Average enrollee: 80 years old, 7.8 medical conditions, an 2.7 dependencies in Activities of Daily Living
55% with urinary incontinence39% living alone, and 14% with no informal supportReductions in use of institutional care w/ controlled
utilization of medical servicesCost savings to Medicare and Medicaid
PACE IDT Function is Critical (3) Findings:
Teams must include: primary care physician, nurse, social worker, PT, OT, recreational therapy, dieticians, PACE day center coordinator, home care coordinators, personal care attendants, and drivers
Prior studies had shown that patients cared for by teams have better survival, functional, and cognitive outcomes, as well as lower institutionalization rates
This study looked at PACE teams for variation
Team Function (cont.)Attendance at team meetings varies according
to participant being discussedTeam meetings typically run by a facilitatorValidated team performance tool compared to
rates of urinary incontinence and ADL function at 3 & 12 months
Statistically significant improvement in ADL’s at 3 months an 12 months with higher functioning teams, and urinary incontinence at 12 months
No association with mortality ratesNote: sites with higher nursing FTE had lower
mortality but not better ADL or UI outcomes
2004 & 2009 Health Policy ReviewsFindings:
Lower rates of nursing home admission, shorter hospital stays, lower mortality rates, and better self-reported health
Costs for PACE enrollees are 16-38% lower than Medicare fee-for-service costs for a frail elderly population
5-15% lower costs than for comparable Medicaid beneficiaries
More likely to die at home
Health Policy articles (cont.)Challenges: Cost and Model structure
Many older adults not keen on adult day centerReluctance to “change doctor”Expensive start up costs, and costly to expandFor profit providers have not entered marketChallenges with state support: concern over
Medicaid budgetsUnaffordable for middle income individuals
2013 Update: Medicaid costs (5)Waiver cohort least impaired to NH most
impairedPACE cohort was a blend between waiver
and NH when looking at burden of illnessExpected Medicaid annual costs for PACE
type participants in alternative long-term care was $36,620
Actual Medicaid capitation to PACE was $27, 648 (28% below the lower limit of predicted fee-for-service payments)
PACE in VirginiaRapid growth since mid-2000’s in Virginia13 Centers in: Stone Gap, Newport News,
Cedar Bluff, Richmond, Fairfax, Hampton, Roanoke, Lynchburg, Virginia Beach, Portsmouth, Farmville, and Petersburg
Blue Ridge PACE is the 14th center in Virginia, our program opened March 1, 2014
Blue Ridge PACENon-profit corporation formed by three
partners:UVA Health SystemsJefferson Area Board on Aging (JABA)Riverside Health Systems
Located at:1335 Carlton Ave.Charlottesville, VA 22902434-529-1300www.blueridgepace.org
Mr. Jones RevisitedBRP participant for 18 months, he has had
three comprehensive team assessments, the last one 3 weeks ago
Receives 14 hrs. of home care weeklyVisits PACE center 5 days per weekParticipates in activities at the centerDaughter has returned to work,
relationships have stabilized
Mr. Jones Becomes IllBoth his home aide and driver notice he
appears ill one morning After a short discussion in the morning IDT
meeting, he is seen by nurse and doctor in PACE clinic same day, with normal WBC and negative CXR done, but fever and cough present
Goals of care reviewed with family, and decision made to try oral antibiotics and observe closely
Antibiotics started
Mr. Jones’ Follow-upHe is seen again the next day in the PACE
clinicTolerating antibiotics, food, and water, no
noticeable deterioration from previous dayThat night becomes acutely short of breath,
becomes frightened, and so does his familyThey contact PACE nurse on call, who also
consults with physicianDue to rural home location, and acuteness of
SOB, decision made to send to ER
ER StayLabs and CXR confirm diagnosis of pneumonia,
but breathing calms down with O2 supplementation
Family is unsure of next steps, and not sure they can manage patient at home
Hospital team and PACE physician discuss case, and decide to admit Mr. Jones
Complete medication list and summary providedThe next day, both the Mr. Jones nurse and the
physician check on him and assist with care planning
Next DayPACE team meets with family, and proposes
plan of care:Discharge from hospital to SNF for course of IV
antibiotics and observation (no 3 day stay required)Restorative therapies will assess him at SNF, and
determine need for therapyAdditional discussions with family depending on
clinical courseDischarge from SNF to home after only 3 days,
with home evaluation and clinic evaluation within 24 hours of discharge
PACE SummaryComprehensive model of medical and social
careTeam based, participant centeredFocus on keeping people in their homeProvide needed care at lowest cost level of careIncreased flexibility compared to usual
Medicare / Medicaid fee-for-service careA community based partner who can help care
for our oldest and most frail patients, and will help care for them wherever they may be
References1. Eng, Catherine; Pedulla, James; Eleazer, Paul G.;
McCann, Robert; and Fox, Norris. “Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): An Innovative Model of Integrated Geriatric Care and Financing”, JAGS Vol. 45, No. 2, Feb 1997, pp. 223-232, 244
2. Gross, Diane L., et al, “The Growing Pains of Integrated Health Care for the Elderly: Lessons from the Expansion of PACE, The Milbank Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 257-82
3. Mukamel, Dana B., et al, “Team Performance and Risk-Adjusted Health Outcomes in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), The Gerontologist, 2006, Vol 46, No. 2, pp. 227-237
References (cont.)4. Petigara, Tanaz and Gerard Anderson. “Program
of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly”. Health Policy Monitor, April 2009 http://www.hpm.org/en/Downloads/Health_Policy_Developments.html
5. Wieland, Darryl, et al, “Does Medicaid Pay More to a Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Than for Fee-for-Service Long-term Care?, J of Gerontology, A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2013 January: 68(1): 47-55