Marion County Small Claims Courts - secure.in.gov · Superior and Circuit Courts approved their...

Marion County Small Claims Courts

Weighted Caseload Plan 2020-2021

MEMO

To: Judge Heather Welch, Presiding Judge, Marion Superior Court

From: Presiding Judge Garland E. Graves, Warren Township Small Claims Courts

Re: Caseload

Date: May 23, 2019

IC 33-34-5-7 provides that a Marion County Small Claims Judge in a low caseload court shall provide five (5) days of assistance to the Judges in the other Marion County Small Claims Courts. A low caseload court is defined in IC 33-34-8-5 as a court with less than four thousand new filings and is limited to two courts. In return for this service IC 33-34-8-3(c) provides that each of the non-low caseload courts shall pay $1.50 of the township docket fee for each new case filed to the township trustee of each low caseload court at the end of each month.

There is little that the Marion County Small Claims Judges can do to allocate cases among the Marion County Small Claims Courts. The legislature has stepped in and implemented a structure where the Judge of the low caseload courts follow the cases rather than allowing for the cases to be reallocated.

Pursuant to Indiana Code 33-34-5-7(a), the Presiding Judge of the MC Small Claims Courts assigns Judge Hockman and Judge Kitley as low caseload court judges each to 10 sessions per month in the following courts:

1. Wayne Township Small Claims Court 2 ½ days or 5 sessions per month. 2. Center Township Small Claims Court 2 ½ days or 5 sessions per month. 3. Lawrence Township Small Claims Court 2 days or 4 sessions per month. 4. Warren Township Small Claims Court 1 day or 2 sessions per month. 5. Perry Township Small Claims Court 1 day or 2 sessions per month. 6. Washington Township Small Claims Court ½ day or 1 session per month. 7. Pike Township Small Claims Court ½ day or 1 session per month.

Upon the request of the high caseload court Judges for coverage, Judge Hockman and Judge Kitley are to work with the Judges to determine the actual schedule.

The Judges of the Marion County Small Claims Courts agree with the certified caseload numbers as provided to the Marion County Circuit Court Judge to determine the low caseload courts for 2017 and 2018. (See Attachment).

Since the Marion Superior and Circuit Court and Marion County Small Claims Courts were created by different statutory authority and operate under different and separate rules of procedure, the Marion

Superior and Circuit Courts approved their plan by a unanimous vote because they fully understand the operational requirements under Indiana law and under the applicable rules. The Marion County Small Claims Court Judges took the same approach for the above reasons and 75% of the Small Claims Judges approved this plan.

Attachment

Indiana Administrative Rule 1(E) Caseload Allocation Plan determines that a small claim case should take 12 minutes from start to finish. Caseload Allocation Plan also accounts for the number of total hours worked in a given year, reduced down for estimated time off. It has been determined by the weighted caseload measurement system that average judicial officer works 77,745 minutes per year.

Caseload Utilization

Marion County Circuit Court & Marion Superior Court


1 | P a g e

Background

Please refer to the following documents distributed earlier for prior details of how this plan was created –

Published Document Comment Feb 09, 2019 This document outlined the status at the end of

2018 using Net case filing numbers and the Judicial Officer assignments that existed as of 12-31-18

Feb 22, 2019 This document took the judicial officer assignments as of 1-21-19 along with the net case filings in each court in 2018, and provided the utilization numbers.

This document takes the 2018-year end net case filings in each court, uses the existing Magistrate Commissioner Schedule and assignments in all the courts, and uses the equalization of filings in the misdemeanor courts, and the juvenile courts to arrive at the utilization numbers.

At this time, the Judges of Marion County are reviewing their court operations in light of the upcoming move to the Community Justice Campus (CJC). The Community Justice Campus is at this time on schedule to be operational in early 2022.

Due to several procedural issues to be discussed, reviewed and considered, it is the opinion of the author that at this time, only the following be submitted as the official plan for Marion County Courts’ Weighted Caseload Allocation/Capture plan for the years 2020-2021.

Marion Superior Court

To: Judge Marc Rothenberg, Weighted Caseload Supervising Judge Court Administrator Emily VanOsdol Executive Committee Judges - Judge Heather Welch, Judge Christina Klineman, Judge Amy Jones, Judge Alicia Gooden

From: Amitav Thamba CC: Marion Superior Court Judges, Circuit Court Judge Sheryl Lynch Date: May 20, 2019 Re: Weighted Caseload Plan for Marion County for 2020-21 submission years

using 2018 net case number filings and equalization of cases in Misdemeanor and Juvenile Courts.

MEMO 1 - Weighted Caseload Review with 2018 case filingsMEMO 2 - 02-20-19- WCL JO assignments of 1-21-19 .pdf

2 | P a g e

2018 NET CASE FILING NUMBERS ARE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT

All case filing numbers used in this document are using 2018 Year End New Case Filings. For this document and going forward we are using NET Numbers for all Case Filings. So the calculation for NET (Adjusted) Filings is Adjusted (NET) Filings = (New Cases Filed + Cases Venued in + Cases Transferred In + Cases filed as Special Judge from Other Court + Other Special Judge in Court ) – (Cases Venued Out + Cases Transferred Out)

DISTRIBUTE CASES EQUALLY WITHIN THE MISDEMEANOR DIVISION COURTS [G07, G08, G10, G12] AND JUVENILE DIVISION COURTS [D09, D15]

Equalizing case filings

1. Misdemeanor Courts a. G19 Court no longer exists, and all

new case filings are taking place in the remaining court – G07, G08, G10, G12.

2. Juvenile Courts

a. We now have courts D09 and D15 that we will be equalizing the case filings for the Juvenile Division.

b. Each court would receive about 4,230 cases (projected) that works out to 489,254 minutes.

3 | P a g e

LAYER 1- 2018 Year End Marion County WCL using existing JO Assignments and equalizing cases in Misdemeanor and Juvenile Courts

• This Excel document contains all NET case filings for 2018 in all courts of record in Marion County and uses the existing Magistrate/Commissioner assignments as of 1-21-2019 along with equalizing of cases in the Misdemeanor Courts (G07, G08, G10, G12) and the Juvenile Courts (D09, D15)

• The TABS on the bottom of the page provide individual court outlines. Click on your court tab and print to review the numbers for your court in 2018.

• The Summary tab provides a quick view of the utilization across all our courts. o The Judicial HAVEs (Judicial assignment values indicated) are using the assignments

as of 1-21-2019. • The MSCJO tab provides a quick view accounting of every session assignment by Judicial

Officers for each court to calculate the Judicial Officer HAVEs value for each court. • The D09-D15 tab provides the view of the juvenile court cases from 2018 (net numbers) for

each case type, and allocating exactly half to each of the D09 and D15 courts to come up with the adjusted Minutes for each court.

• The MISDEMEANOR ADJ tab provides the view of the net numbers in the misdemeanor courts in 2018, and then dividing them up equally for 2019 to arrive at the new projected NET numbers for 2019.

• The snapshot of that effort for each court based on Assignments as of 1-21-2019

Other NOTES • Civil D04 – All Civil Courts normally receive 6 sessions of Magistrate time. Civil D04 has 7

sessions of Judicial Officer time allotted as it handles the OV case docket. Due to that, D04 receives an additional 1 session of Magistrate time taking it to a 2.07 Judicial Time instead of 1.67.

4 | P a g e

• EC and Term Presiding Judges each are getting a 1 session of Judicial Officer Time. The table below shows the utilizations for each of the EC Judges without giving them an extra commissioner session.

2018 Initial Review Case Filing Numbers

• As part of the end of year review, on Feb 8, 2019, and on Feb 15, 2019 I received from the IOJA the 2018 official numbers based on our 4 quarters of new case filings. All net adjusted numbers are documented and certified numbers from the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration.

5 | P a g e

6 | P a g e

FOR IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION

At this time, this is recommended for immediate implementation to give relief across all Criminal Division Courts.

1. Search warrants (MC – Miscellaneous Criminal) case types have 17 minutes allocated to each case filings. In 2018, there were 7118 Search warrants filed and all of those minutes were distributed only to the Major Felony Courts. The 7118 cases accounted for 1.6 Judicial Officer time that should be attributed to the Initial Hearing Court (IHC) judicial officers. As the session times for the IHC Judicial Officers is distributed across all the Criminal Division courts, we will be distributing all the MC Search Warrant type case numbers going forward to all courts in the Criminal Division from sometime in June 2019.

So at this time, the 1.6 Judicial Officer time should be equally distributed across all Criminal Division Courts and not just limited to Major Felony courts. The MC cases for search warrants will also be randomly distributed across all Criminal Division Courts, with each court getting credit for 339 MC Search Warrant case. Doing this step will ensure the following numbers (using 2018 Net Numbers).

7 | P a g e

Distributing Search Warrant MC Cases across all Criminal Division Courts

This table shows for each court the original MC cases that were filed per court. The column NEW outlines the new MC case numbers after distributing the search warrant cases across all the criminal division courts. Doing this also changes the Minutes for each of the courts, and the new minutes are also shown here along with the differences in utilization.

1. There would be NO change in Judicial Officer Sessions allocations regarding this.

2. The ONLY change proposed in the plan is

that the Odyssey Case Management System would be changed, and ALL Criminal Division Courts would now be in the rotation to be allocated the MC (Miscellaneous Criminal) cases with sub-type of “SEARCH WARRANT”. This would then allocate the appropriate minutes for each of the courts.

8 | P a g e

With distributed search warrants across all Criminal Division Courts, utilization numbers are as shown below

9 | P a g e

2. Ordinance Violations (OV) Court Docket – Judicial Officer Needs

The Current Judicial Officer schedule for the Magistrate OV Docket that handles Ordinance Violations cases is as shown below –

For 2018, there were 4392 OV cases filed that are allocated 2 minutes for each case for a total of 8784 minutes. Due to that, we should allocate Judicial Officers to handle the cases appropriately.

PROPOSED: The OV Docket will have the following Judicial Officer assignments

The suggested NEW assignment for the OV docket is 3 Sessions with a 4th one available – the Judicial Officer for the 4th session is actually assigned to IHC, but available for the OV docket and will be working on the Search Warrant Queue, PC findings and IHC queue and the OV queues during the THURSDAY AM session. In the event there is a shortage of judicial officer in both the OV and the IHC docket on THURSDAY AM, the judicial officer will look to fill the IHC Docket first with a pro tem appointment to the OV docket. The recommendation would be to tell the OV docket practitioners to ONLY schedule Court sessions for MONDAY AM, TUESDAY AM and WEDNESDAY AM. We should allow for a maximum of 60 days’ transition time for this to occur.

3. Initial Hearing Court Docket – Judicial Officer Needs

The Initial Hearing Court docket needs to have at least 2 Judicial Officers assigned to each session as the Judges have to conduct the initial hearings on the bench for all lower felony courts while also handling search warrant requests for the whole county, along with PC determination and all initial queue activity for all lower felony level courts.

Currently, there is a gap of 6 sessions that is handled by just 1 Judicial Officer as shown below -

PROPOSED: IHC Docket will have the following assignments

10 | P a g e

The utilization for D04 after removing 5 sessions of Judicial Officer time and assigning to the IHC docket rises to 0.9 from the existing 0.78. Please see charts to the right for details.

Notes for Proposed IHC Schedule:

a) Mag. Jim Snyder has MONDAY off – this allows him to be assigned for the Weekend Day Shift coverage

b) The Judicial Officers assigned to IHC will operate in both IHC and will also be watching the Search warrant queue, IHC docket queue for PC findings, urgent queues and any OV paperwork queue.

c) The reason to have 2 JOs simultaneously assigned is to allow for any emergency situation as well to handle vacation/time offs etc. It is recommended that while approving leave requests BOTH judicial officers assigned to a day not have the same time off.

d) The only session that does not have 2 Judicial officer assignment is FRIDAY AM session and this can be reviewed in the near future to fill.

4. Title IVD Court Docket – Judicial Officer Needs – NO CHANGE

The Title IVD docket benefits greatly by having the continuity of the same judicial officer. Currently the docket is handled by Magistrate Marci Ferree for 4 sessions.

There would be no other changes to that docket assignment or judicial officer assignment.

11 | P a g e

The Marion County Courts (Circuit and Superior Courts) are required by Administrative Rule 1(E) and Indiana Supreme Court Order (49S00-1009-MS-483 and 94S00-1701-MS-5) to submit a Weighted Caseload plan for the planned years 2020-2021 by June 1, 2019.

As part of the plan submission, we are required to review the case filings and variance numbers at the end of 2018 using the submitted Quarterly Case Status Reports (QCSR) for each of the courts in our County. As part of a detailed review of the Administrative Rule 1 (E) the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration (IOJA) also did a comprehensive review of the minutes allocated to each case type. In 2017, judicial minutes available for each year per judge for case related activities has been set to 77,745. The Indiana Supreme Court order states that “courts of record in each county shall, by a local rule, develop and implement a caseload allocation plan for the county that ensures an even distribution of judicial caseloads among the judges of the courts of record in the county”.

The key aspect is that once the caseload plan is created, the order says “(3) County Plans. The judges of the courts of record in each county must approve the county caseload allocation plan by not less than 75% vote. The chief judge or another judge designated by the courts of record in the county shall submit the approved county plan to the IOJA by the deadline established in the schedule.”

NEXT STEPS

1. Review CAPTURE/WCL Plan with all Marion County Circuit and Superior Court Judges on May 8, 2019

2. Get CAPTURE/WCL Plan from the Marion County Small Claims Courts and incorporate as a section in the Marion County CAPTURE plan submission by 5-17-2019.

3. On 5-20-2019 complete CAPTURE/WCL Plan after vote of the General Term, and 4. By May 30, 2019 submit the plan for future court operations in the years 2020-2021 as

required by WCL Plan submission to the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration (IOJA) for consideration by the Indiana Supreme Court.

Please let me know of any questions and if there are more details I can provide regarding this. Respectfully Submitted.

Amitav Thamba


MEMO 1 - Weighted Caseload Review with 2018 case filings


1 | P a g e

Background The Marion County Courts (Circuit and Superior Courts) are required by Administrative Rule 1(E) and Indiana Supreme Court Order (49S00-1009-MS-483 and 94S00-1701-MS-5) to submit a Weighted Caseload plan for the planned years 2020-2021 by June 1, 2019. As part of the plan submission, we are required to review the case filings and variance numbers at the end of 2018 using the submitted Quarterly Case Status Reports (QCSR) for each of the courts in our County. As part of a detailed review of the Administrative Rule 1 (E) the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration (IOJA) also did a comprehensive review of the minutes allocated to each case type. In 2017, judicial minutes available for each year per judge for case related activities has been set to 77,745. Three factors contribute to the calculation of resource need: case filings, case weights and judicial officer year value.

Workload = Cases Filed X Case Weight Resource Need= Workload ÷ Judge Year Value

Here is the link for details on the Weighted Caseload Measures and the calculations involved. http://www.in.gov/judiciary/admin/files/pubs-trial-court-weighted-caseload.pdf



From: Amitav Thamba CC: Marion Superior Court Judges, Circuit Court Judge Sheryl Lynch Date: February 20, 2019 Re: MEMO 1 - Weighted Caseload Review with 2018 case filings and the new

minutes allocations.

http://www.in.gov/judiciary/admin/files/pubs-trial-court-weighted-caseload.pdf

2 | P a g e

The chart below maps the case filings in 2018 for each case type and for this year we have begun using NET Numbers taking into account New Case Filings, Cases Venued In, Cases Transferred In, Special Judge for Other Court, Other Special Judge in Court, Venued Out and Transferred out.

So the calculation for Adjusted Filings is

Adjusted Filings = (New Cases Filed + Venued in + Transferred In + Special Judge for Other Court + Other Special Judge in Court ) – (Venued Out + Transferred Out)

The schedule for submitting caseload allocation plans shall follow the schedule for adoption of all local rules under Trial Rule 81 and is as follows:

1. April 15, 2019 – Division of State Court Administration shall publish the WCL report based on the prior year caseload statistics.

2. June 1, 2019 – Courts of record in the counties who are due to file caseload plans that year pursuant to Section 10 of AR 1(E) shall submit their plans to the Division of State Court Administration for publication and shall publish notice for comment pursuant to T.R. 81.

3. July 1, 2019 – Close of comment period. 4. July 2 to July 31, 2019 – Final approval of caseload plans by local courts. 5. August 1, 2019 – Submission of locally approved caseload plans to Division of State Court

Administration for approval pursuant to Administrative Rule 1 (E)(3). 6. October 1, 2019 – Supreme Court action – approval, return with request for revisions, or

rejection. 7. November 1, 2019 – Revised plans due before Supreme Court. 8. November 15, 2019 – Final Supreme Court action on resubmitted plans. 9. January 1, 2020 – effective date of caseload plan.

The Supreme Court order states that “courts of record in each county shall, by a local rule, develop and implement a caseload allocation plan for the county that ensures an even distribution of judicial caseloads among the judges of the courts of record in the county”.

The key aspect is that once the caseload plan is created, the order says “(3) County Plans. The judges of the courts of record in each county must approve the county caseload allocation plan by not less than 75% vote. The chief judge or another judge designated by the courts of record in the county shall submit the approved county plan to the IOJA by the deadline established in the schedule.”

3 | P a g e

2018 Initial Review Case Filing Numbers As part of the end of year review, on Feb 8, 2019, and on Feb 15, 2019 I received from the IOJA the 2018 official numbers based on our 4 quarters of new case filings. This document for the purpose of this document is now labelled as (attached to this document here ) 2018 Year End Marion County Weighted Caseload Utilization

• Original document received from IOJA with NET Filing numbers • This document contains all NEW case filings for 2018 in all courts of record in Marion

County • The document for each court has an Additional Resources Calculation section where we

have documented the number of Senior Judge days used, and the computation that accounts for additional judicial resources that is used in the NET Numbers utilization calculations.

• The TABS on the bottom of the page provide individual court outlines. Click on your court tab and print to review the numbers for your court in 2018.

• The Summary tab provides a quick view of the utilization across all our courts. o The Judicial HAVEs (Judicial assignment values indicated) are using the

assignments as of 12-31-2018.

• This did not take into effect any case movements or court movements that took place throughout 2018 or the court structure that exists beginning from 1-1-2019. It just took case filings in a court with the existing Judicial Officer assignments and documented what the court utilization was based on the net case filings.

• The snapshot of that effort is shown here. Additional Information The link for the rule is at Administrative Rule 1(E) The link for a primer for developing a CAP and the appendix to Admin. Rule 1 are online as well.

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTcwMzAxLjcwNTkyNzYxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE3MDMwMS43MDU5Mjc2MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MTUyMjM4JmVtYWlsaWQ9ZW1pbHkudmFub3Nkb2xAaW5keS5nb3YmdXNlcmlkPWVtaWx5LnZhbm9zZG9sQGluZHkuZ292JmZsPSZleHRyYT1NdWx0aXZhcmlhdGVJZD0mJiY=&&&100&&&http://www.in.gov/judiciary/rules/admin/index.html#_Toc471915727

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTcwMzAxLjcwNTkyNzYxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE3MDMwMS43MDU5Mjc2MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MTUyMjM4JmVtYWlsaWQ9ZW1pbHkudmFub3Nkb2xAaW5keS5nb3YmdXNlcmlkPWVtaWx5LnZhbm9zZG9sQGluZHkuZ292JmZsPSZleHRyYT1NdWx0aXZhcmlhdGVJZD0mJiY=&&&101&&&http://www.in.gov/judiciary/admin/2491.htm

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTcwMzAxLjcwNTkyNzYxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE3MDMwMS43MDU5Mjc2MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MTUyMjM4JmVtYWlsaWQ9ZW1pbHkudmFub3Nkb2xAaW5keS5nb3YmdXNlcmlkPWVtaWx5LnZhbm9zZG9sQGluZHkuZ292JmZsPSZleHRyYT1NdWx0aXZhcmlhdGVJZD0mJiY=&&&102&&&http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/judiciary-files-wcl-standards.pdf

4 | P a g e

5 | P a g e

Next Steps. In the next few days, I will be creating the state of the courts using the above case filings with the following changes on it –

1. Equalizing case filings a. in Misdemeanor Courts

i. G19 Court does not exist, and all new case filings are taking place in the remaining court – G07, G08, G10, G12.

b. In Juvenile Courts i. We now have courts D09 and D15 that we will be equalizing the case filings

for the Juvenile Division. 2. Using existing Judicial Officers Assignments in each court to get the next utilization

values. I expect to be able to send that report out to all Judges by 2-28-2019. Other Questions that have been asked Some questions that have been asked in the past are – 1. My workload is way higher than the numbers reported.

Ans: Page 3 (Section AR 1 (E)) of the 1st attachment outlines the key changes that have been made. I believe that these are a lot more lenient than what they have been in the past. Nevertheless, here are some key aspects –

a. I have heard, and been told by many different sources that we are not to use “NET” numbers in calculation of the caseload plan. The concept of “NET CASES” is shown below -

NEW CASE FILINGS – CASES TRANSFERRED OUT + CASES TRANSFERRED IN = NET CASES that a Judge works on that year

The Supreme Court has diligently struck off the work WORKLOAD and replaced it with the word CASELOAD everywhere in the rule. At this time, the only 2 ways that IOJA allows counting of cases is by NEW CASE FILING into a court or NET NUMBERS. We are allowed to choose as a county which method we want to choose. The recommendation at this point is to choose the NET NUMBERS method as it then accounts for all the changes of Judges and each court will then truly get accounted for the caseload that they handle. 2. How are those new case numbers counted? We are required by the Indiana Office of Court Services (“IOCS”) and administrative rules promulgated by the Indiana Supreme Court to gather quarterly statistical data on the work of the courts in our county. The Quarterly Case Status Report (QCSR) is the report developed by IOCS to collect the required information about the volume and the type of business conducted by the courts and the methods by which cases are disposed. All reports are

6 | P a g e

filed online using the Indiana Courts Online Reports (ICOR) application through the INcite (Indiana Courts Technology Extranet) website: https://mycourts.in.gov . Passwords to access these applications are distributed through the Court Technology. Since 2014, all data for our courts have been compiled directly into the ICOR QCSR system from the Odyssey Case Management System. The QCSR data filed with IOCS is used to compute a weighted caseload measure for each trial court. The weighted caseload measure is an index of the judicial resources or judicial time required to process cases filed in the court. ICOR Online Statistics are also available for every county across the state at http://publicaccess.courts.in.gov/ICOR 3. Why are “Special Judge” cases not counted in this? What about the new cases like DC and DN

case weights – how do you account for them? What about DR and other cases?

Ans: This is the NET NUMBERS question, and we are counting them if we choose the NET NUMBERS accounting method for our weighted caseload calculations. The new DC and DN case weights (which replaced the former DR case type) are all used in the calculations. We also account for every case type that has a minutes value allocated.

4. When do we have to have this voted on by general term and turned in to the Supreme Court?

Ans: This needs to be reviewed with drafts communicated to general term by April 2019, and then finally voted in May 2019 for submission by May 31, 2019. NEXT STEPS

- By 2-28-19 provide update spreadsheet with calculations using existing Judicial officer assignments, and equalizing of case filings based on existing court structure.

- By 3-22-19 provide options for WCL Plan submission for discussion with IOJA. Please let me know of any questions and if there are more details I can provide regarding this. Respectfully Submitted.

Amitav Thamba

https://mycourts.in.gov/

http://publicaccess.courts.in.gov/ICOR


MEMO 2 – 2-20-19 – WCL Using Judicial Officer Assignments of 1-21-19


1 | P a g e

Background

Please refer to MEMO 1 - Weighted Caseload Review with 2018 case filings and the new minutes

allocations that was published on Feb 20, 2019 for prior details.

This document takes the 2018-year end net case filings in each court, uses the existing Magistrate

Commissioner Schedule and assignments in all the courts, and also equalizes the filings in the

following courts to arrive at the Utilization numbers.

Equalizing case filings

a. Misdemeanor Courts

i. G19 Court does not

exist, and all new case

filings are taking place

in the remaining court

– G07, G08, G10,

G12.

b. Juvenile Courts

i. We now have courts D09 and D15 that we will be equalizing the case filings

for the Juvenile Division.

ii. Each court would receive about 4230 cases (projected) that works out to

489254 minutes.



From: Amitav Thamba

CC: Marion Superior Court Judges, Circuit Court Judge Sheryl Lynch

Date: February 22, 2019

Re: MEMO 2 - Weighted Caseload Review with 2018 case net number filings and equalization of cases in Misdemeanor and Juvenile Courts.

2 | P a g e

LAYER 1- 2018 Year End Marion County WCL using existing JO Assignments and

equalizing cases in Misdemeanor and Juvenile Courts

This Excel document contains all NET case filings for 2018 in all courts of record in

Marion County and uses the existing Magistrate/Commissioner assignments as of 1-21-

2019 along with equalizing of cases in the Misdemeanor Courts (G07, G08, G10, G12) and

the Juvenile Courts (D09, D15)

The TABS on the bottom of the page provide individual court outlines. Click on your court

tab and print to review the numbers for your court in 2018.

The Summary tab provides a quick view of the utilization across all our courts.

o The Judicial HAVEs (Judicial assignment values indicated) are using the

assignments as of 1-21-2019.

The MSCJO tab provides a quick view accounting of every session assignment by Judicial

Officers for each court to calculate the Judicial Officer HAVEs value for each court.

The D09-D15 tab provides the view of the juvenile court cases from 2018 (net numbers)

for each case type, and allocating exactly half to each of the D09 and D15 courts to come

up with the adjusted Minutes for each court.

The MISDEMEANOR ADJ tab provides the view of the net numbers in the misdemeanor

courts in 2018, and then dividing them up equally for 2019 to arrive at the new projected

NET numbers for 2019.

The snapshot of that effort is shown below.

3 | P a g e

4 | P a g e

NEXT STEPS

- By 3-22-19 provide options to all Judges for review regarding future court operations in the

years 2020-2021 as required by WCL Plan submission for discussion with IOJA.

Please let me know of any questions and if there are more details I can provide regarding this.

Respectfully Submitted.

Amitav Thamba

2018 Year End Marion County Weighted Caseload Utilization

UPDATED WITH LAYER 1

Utilization ‐ MINIMUM 0.66 49G04 Utilization ‐ MINIMUM 0.75 49C01

Utilization ‐ MAXIMUM 2.41 49G13 Utilization ‐ MAXIMUM 1.92 49G13

Group CourtID Cases Minutes Have Need Utilization CourtID Minutes Have Need Utilization

Circuit 49C01 5373 495,691 8.20 6.38 0.78 49C01 493,689 8.50 6.35 0.75

Civil 49D01 2212 117540 1.80 1.51 0.84 49D01 138,428 1.87 1.78 0.95

Civil 49D02 2401 138673 1.70 1.78 1.05 49D02 142,774 1.67 1.84 1.1

Civil 49D03 2331 136498 1.80 1.76 0.98 49D03 136,873 1.67 1.76 1.05

Civil 49D04 6755 147393 1.90 1.9 1 49D04 144,714 2.37 1.86 0.78

Civil 49D05 2316 130655 2.10 1.68 0.8 49D05 134,601 1.67 1.73 1.04

Civil 49D06 2376 143784 1.70 1.85 1.09 49D06 135,211 1.67 1.74 1.04

Civil 49D07 2298 132840 1.77 1.71 0.97 49D07 135,522 1.67 1.74 1.04

Civil 49D10 2346 140129 1.80 1.8 1 49D10 136,451 1.67 1.76 1.05

Civil 49D11 2334 137977 1.70 1.77 1.04 49D11 135,346 1.67 1.74 1.04

Civil 49D12 2188 122900 2.07 1.58 0.76 49D12 132,226 2.07 1.7 0.82

Civil 49D13 2318 134999 1.70 1.74 1.02 49D13 136,253 1.67 1.75 1.05

Civil 49D14 2353 136976 1.69 1.76 1.04 49D14 136,392 1.67 1.75 1.05

Probate 49D08 6327 245883 3.00 3.16 1.05 49D08 246,117 3.00 3.17 1.06

Juvenile 49D09 8828 1041448 12.00 13.4 1.12 49D09 489,254 6.31 6.29 1

Juvenile 49D15 49D15 489,254 6.31 6.29 1

MajorFelony 49G01 2224 139217 1.83 1.79 0.98 49G01 153,957 1.84 1.98 1.08

MajorFelony 49G02 2024 135905 2.01 1.75 0.87 49G02 149,221 1.84 1.92 1.04

MajorFelony 49G03 1998 130829 2.17 1.68 0.77 49G03 140,916 1.84 1.81 0.98

MajorFelony 49G04 2003 131179 2.58 1.69 0.66 49G04 145,293 1.84 1.87 1.02

MajorFelony 49G05 2064 134606 1.74 1.73 0.99 49G05 144,333 1.84 1.86 1.01

MajorFelony 49G06 2035 127753 1.74 1.64 0.94 49G06 155,162 1.84 2 1.09

MF‐Drug 49G20 2649 159521 2.14 2.05 0.96 49G20 184,941 2.24 2.38 1.06

MF‐Drug 49G21 2653 156078 2.14 2.01 0.94 49G21 150,504 2.34 1.94 0.83

Misdemeanor 49G07 2150 83440 1.44 1.07 0.74 49G07 95,299 1.54 1.23 0.8

Misdemeanor 49G08 2133 105,493 1.67 1.36 0.81 49G08 120,679 1.84 1.55 0.84

Misdemeanor 49G10 2118 82211 1.32 1.06 0.8 49G10 95,299 1.54 1.23 0.8

Misdemeanor 49G12 2079 95376 1.14 1.23 1.08 49G12 110,950 1.54 1.43 0.93

Traffic 49G13 66505 241861 1.29 3.11 2.41 49G13 229,083 1.54 2.95 1.92

DV 49G16 4072 164897 1.87 2.12 1.13 49G16 171,330 1.84 2.2 1.2

DV 49G17 4097 166496 1.86 2.14 1.15 49G17 172,368 1.94 2.22 1.14

L6 49G09 1651 119,084 1.57 1.53 0.97 49G09 125,498 1.64 1.61 0.98

L6 49G15 1645 116120 1.57 1.49 0.95 49G15 131,691 1.64 1.69 1.03

L6 49G18 1860 126556 1.44 1.63 1.13 49G18 135,637 1.64 1.74 1.06

L6 49G24 1653 120706 1.44 1.55 1.08 49G24 126,516 1.64 1.63 0.99

L6‐Drug 49G14 2343 223417 2.34 2.87 1.23 49G14 278,685 2.44 3.58 1.47

L6‐Drug 49G25 2121 143519 1.54 1.85 1.2 49G25 154,430 1.64 1.99 1.21

UNADJUSTED NET MINUTES ADJUSTED

NET MINUTES ADJUSTEDUNADJUSTED

LAYER 1 ‐ 2018 Year End Marion County Weighted Caseload Utilization.xlsx ‐ MSCJO

Printed: 5/28/2019 ‐ 10:53 AM

JUDICIAL OFFICERS 0 37.500 4.3516667 3.3516667 3.3516667 6.8516667 3.3516667 3.351666667 3.3516667 10 26.56 3.3516667 3.3516667 5.3516667 3.3516667 3.3516667 26.56 4.1980952 4.1980952 4.1980952 4.1980952 4.1980952 4.1980952 2.6980952 4.1980952 3.1980952 2.6980952 2.6980952 2.6980952 7.1980952 3.1980952 4.1980952 4.6980952 3.1980952 6.1980952 6.6980952 3.1980952 3.1980952

Haves (incl Judge) 83.50 8.50 1.87 1.67 1.67 2.37 1.67 1.67 1.67 3.00 6.31 1.67 1.67 2.07 1.67 1.67 6.31 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.54 1.84 1.64 1.54 1.54 1.54 2.44 1.64 1.84 1.94 1.64 2.24 2.34 1.64 1.64

Name Total Days C01 D01 D02 D03 D04 D05 D06 D07 D08 D09 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 G01 G02 G03 G04 G05 G06 G07 G08 G09 G10 G12 G13 G14 G15 G16 G17 G18 G20 G21 G24 G25

Barbar, Amy 5.000 1.000 3.000 0.500 0.500

Broadwell, Marshelle 5.000 2.000 3.000

Caudill, Burnett 5.000 1.000 0.500 1.000 0.500 0.500 1.000 0.500

Christ, John 5.000 5.000

Dill, Caryl 5.000 3.000 2.000

Flannelly, Anne 5.000 0.500 0.500 0.024 0.024 0.024 3.024 0.024 0.024 0.524 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024

Hagenmaier, Richard 5.000 5.000

Haile, Christopher 5.000 2.500 2.500

Hannah, Therese 5.000 2.000 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.571 0.071 0.071 0.071 1.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071

Hart, Peggy 5.000 3.000 1.000 1.000

Hooper, David 5.000 1.500 1.500 2.000

Huerta, Ronnie 5.000 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 2.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 1.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 1.524 0.024

Kendrick, Melanie 5.000 5.000

Kroh, Stan 5.000 3.000 2.000

Marchal, Jeffrey 5.000 2.500 2.500

Mattingly, Kimberly 5.000 2.500 2.500

Murphy, Patrick H. 5.000 3.000 2.000

Renner, Mark 5.000 2.500 0.500 0.500 1.500

Reyome, Jason 5.000 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.690 0.690 0.190 0.190 0.190

Rubick, Steven 5.000 1.000 0.500 3.500

Sandifur. Travis 5.000 2.000 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.119 0.619 0.119

Scanlan, Kelly 5.000 5.000

Shook, Deborah 5.000 0.125 0.125 3.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.500

Snyder, James 5.000 0.024 3.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 1.024 0.524 0.024 0.024

Stewart, Ian 5.000 0.500 2.000 0.500 0.500 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.071

Deppert, Gael 5.000 5.000

Ferree, Marcia 5.000 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 1.500 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 0.167 1.500

Gaither, Geoffrey 5.000 5.000

Gaughan, Danielle 5.000 5.000

Hubartt, Jennifer 5.000 5.000

Stowers, Scott 5.000 5.000

Ang, Roseanne 5.000 ` 5.000

Burleson, Diana 5.000 5.000

Gardner, Ryan K. 5.000 5.000

Haughan, Peter 5.000 5.000

Jansen, Beth 5.000 5.000

Boatright, Susan 5.000 5.000

Collins,Amber 5.000 5.000

Crawford‐Moss, Stepha 2.500 2.500

Gaskill, Laura 5.000 5.000

Kern, Marie 5.000 5.000

Kramer, Missy 5.000 5.000

Rogers, Tamara 5.000 5.000

Vivo, Tiffany 5.000 5.000

Boyce, John 5.000 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

Cowger, Diane 5.000 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

Springer (Haley), Jen 5.000 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

JUDICIAL OFFICERS 37.500 4.352 3.352 3.352 6.852 3.352 3.352 3.352 10.000 26.560 3.352 3.352 5.352 3.352 3.352 26.560 4.198 4.198 4.198 4.198 4.198 4.198 2.698 4.198 3.198 2.698 2.698 2.698 7.198 3.198 4.198 4.698 3.198 6.198 6.698 3.198 3.198

NOTES 84.50 8.50 1.87 1.67 1.67 2.37 1.67 1.67 1.67 3.00 7.31 1.67 1.67 2.07 1.67 1.67 6.31 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.54 1.84 1.64 1.54 1.54 1.54 2.44 1.64 1.84 1.94 1.64 2.24 2.34 1.64 1.64

0.1127273

PRO Supp Court Calculations

Sessions allotted 3 for 12 Civil Courts

Shook, Deborah 0.125 for each Civil Court

IV D Superior Court Calculations

Sessions allotted 4 for 12 Civil Courts

Ferree, Marcia 0.166667 for each Civil Court

IHC G11 Court Calculations 21 Crim Court

# sessions

Flannelly, Anne 0.5 0.02381

Hannah, Therese 1.5 0.071429

Huerta, Ronnie 0.5 0.02381

Reyome, Jason 4 0.190476

Sandifur. Travis 2.5 0.119048

Snyder, James 0.5 0.02381

Stewart, Ian 1.5 0.071429

Boyce, John Civil time 0.02 Crim Time 4.72 0.224762 <‐ each crim court gets

Cowger, Diane Civil time 0.02 Crim Time 4.72 0.224762 <‐ each crim court gets

Springer (Haley), Jen Civil time 0.02 Crim Time 4.72 0.224762 <‐ each crim court gets

The JO Assignment as of 1‐21‐2019

Case Category Weight D09 New D09 New D15Adj

Minutes

XP 25 13 7 7 175

JC 176 3371 1686 1686 296736

JD 91 1702 851 851 77441

JS 17 138 69 69 1173

JP 146 121 61 61 8906

JM 8 1438 719 719 5752

JT 124 1477 739 739 91636

GU 93 142 71 71 6603

PO 28 15 8 8 224

MI 32 38 19 19 608

Total

Cases4230 4230 489254

Equal case filings in D09 & D15

Adjusting Numbers for 4 remaining Misdemeanor Courts (G07, G08, G10, G12)

Case Category Weight G07 G08 G10 G12 G19 Total Each Minutes

DP 2,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LWOP 2,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MR 1,038 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CF 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FA 359 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FB 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FC 211 1 2 0 ‐1 0 2 1 211

FD 125 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 125

L1 679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L2 269 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

L3 232 0 3 0 ‐1 0 2 1 232

L4 195 0 2 1 0 0 3 1 195

L5 149 0 13 1 3 1 18 5 745

L6 92 4 46 2 17 2 71 18 1656

PC 351 4 0 4 1 1 10 3 1053

CM 39 2113 2062 2060 2097 539 8871 2218 86502

MC 17 33 39 33 35 26 166 42 714

XP 25 159 127 146 74 100 606 152 3800

IF 1 3 1 3 1 1 9 2 2

OV 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

Problem Solving Referrals 423 0 60 0 37 0

JC 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JD 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JS 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JP 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JM 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JT 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JQ 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CP 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PL 121 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

MF 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CC 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CT 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SC 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DR 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DN 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RS 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MH 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AD 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ES 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EU 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EM 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GU 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TR 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PO 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TS 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TP 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 32 1 2 1 2 1 7 2 64

Problem Solving Minutes=423 per case Total 95299

G07 minutes 95299

G08 gets 60 cases 25380 G08 minutes 120679

G10 minutes 95299

G12 gets 37 cases 15651 G12 minutes 110950

Case Category Weight # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes

DP 2,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LWOP 2,649 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MR 1,038 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CF 0 0 0 0

FA 359 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FB 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FC 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FD 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L1 679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L2 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L3 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L4 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L5 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L6 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PC 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CM 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MC 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

XP 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0

IF 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OV 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Prob. Solving Ref. 423 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JC 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JD 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JS 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JP 146 1886 275,356 0 0 0 0 0 0

JM 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JT 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JQ 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CP 0 0 0 0

PL 121 344 41,624 136 16,456 179 21,659 158 19,118

MF 24 122 2,928 178 4,272 177 4,248 175 4,200

CC 16 140 2,240 1252 20,032 1256 20,096 1257 20,112

CT 148 687 101,676 194 28,712 274 40,552 312 46,176

SC 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DR 0 0 0 0

DC 259 10 2,590 143 37,037 152 39,368 141 36,519

DN 39 0 0 185 7,215 180 7,020 179 6,981

RS 37 349 12,913 0 0 0 0 0 0

MH 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AD 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ES 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EU 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EM 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GU 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TR 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PO 28 339 9,492 38 1,064 26 728 24 672

TS 128 1 128 0 0 0 0 0 0

TP 21 99 2,079 0 0 2 42 0 0

MI 32 1395 44,640 86 2,752 155 4,960 85 2,720

Total 5373 495691 2212 117540 2401 138673 2331 136498

Minutes 6,377,284 Minutes 495,691 Minutes 117,540 Minutes 138,673 Minutes 136,498

Have 83 Have 8.20 Have 1.80 Have 1.70 Have 1.80

Need 82.03 Need 6.38 Need 1.51 Need 1.78 Need 1.76

Utilization 0.99 Utilization 0.78 Utilization 0.84 Utilization 1.05 Utilization 0.98

County Total

49D0249C01 49D01 49D03

49D0349D0249D0149C01

2018 Marion County Weighted Caseload Measures (NET)

Page 5 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019

Case Category Weight

DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2

Prob. Solving Ref. 423

JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total

# of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 359

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 125 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4392 8,784 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 248 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

162 19,602 150 18,150 163 19,723 156 18,876 25 3,025

174 4,176 174 4,176 177 4,248 176 4,224 0 0

1259 20,144 1263 20,208 1256 20,096 1246 19,936 0 0

315 46,620 276 40,848 346 51,208 278 41,144 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

143 37,037 139 36,001 147 38,073 146 37,814 0 0

182 7,098 185 7,215 188 7,332 186 7,254 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3348 70,308

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 511 25,039

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 8,300

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 44,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 2,619

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 909 84,537

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 7,056

41 1,148 41 1,148 16 448 28 784 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

87 2,784 87 2,784 83 2,656 80 2,560 20 640

6755 147393 2316 130655 2376 143784 2298 132840 6327 245883

Minutes 147,393 Minutes 130,655 Minutes 143,784 Minutes 132,840 Minutes 245,883

Have 1.90 Have 2.10 Have 1.70 Have 1.77 Have 3.00

Need 1.90 Need 1.68 Need 1.85 Need 1.71 Need 3.16

Utilization 1.00 Utilization 0.80 Utilization 1.09 Utilization 0.97 Utilization 1.05

49D08

49D08

49D05 49D06 49D07

49D04 49D05 49D06 49D07

49D04


Page 6 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total

# of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 325 1 25 0 0 1 25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3354 590,304 0 0 0 0 0 0

1639 149,149 0 0 0 0 0 0

123 2,091 0 0 0 0 0 0

623 90,958 0 0 0 0 0 0

1426 11,408 0 0 0 0 0 0

1479 183,396 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 158 19,118 158 19,118 141 17,061

0 0 176 4,224 176 4,224 177 4,248

0 0 1245 19,920 1254 20,064 1250 20,000

0 0 326 48,248 317 46,916 244 36,112

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 147 38,073 144 37,296 142 36,778

0 0 180 7,020 185 7,215 188 7,332

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

137 12,741 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 84 26 728 14 392 24 672

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 21 0 0 0 0

31 992 86 2,752 86 2,752 21 672

8828 1041448 2346 140129 2334 137977 2188 122900

Minutes 1,041,448 Minutes 140,129 Minutes 137,977 Minutes 122,900

Have 12.00 Have 1.80 Have 1.70 Have 2.07

Need 13.40 Need 1.80 Need 1.77 Need 1.58

Utilization 1.12 Utilization 1.00 Utilization 1.04 Utilization 0.76

49D12

49D1249D09 49D10 49D11

49D09 49D10 49D11


Page 7 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total

# of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

1 25 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

161 19,481 158 19,118

178 4,272 177 4,248

1253 20,048 1263 20,208

284 42,032 301 44,548

0 0 0 0

0 0

149 38,591 146 37,814

186 7,254 188 7,332

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

24 672 33 924

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

82 2,624 87 2,784

2318 134999 2353 136976

Minutes 134,999 Minutes 136,976

Have 1.70 Have 1.69

Need 1.74 Need 1.76

Utilization 1.02 Utilization 1.04

49D13 49D14

49D13 49D14


Page 8 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 13,494 13 13,494 11 11,418 15 15,570

0 0 0 0

3 1,077 3 1,077 3 1,077 2 718

5 1,090 1 218 2 436 0 0

11 2,321 3 633 3 633 4 844

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 8,827 15 10,185 15 10,185 12 8,148

9 2,421 11 2,959 8 2,152 9 2,421

94 21,808 75 17,400 63 14,616 69 16,008

61 11,895 66 12,870 65 12,675 59 11,505

245 36,505 263 39,187 248 36,952 248 36,952

28 2,576 29 2,668 23 2,116 22 2,024

19 6,669 24 8,424 33 11,583 28 9,828

34 1,326 25 975 22 858 22 858

1628 27,676 1446 24,582 1444 24,548 1442 24,514

60 1,500 48 1,200 56 1,400 69 1,725

0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 148 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 32 1 32 1 32 2 64

2224 139217 2024 135905 1998 130829 2003 131179

Minutes 139,217 Minutes 135,905 Minutes 130,829 Minutes 131,179




49G04

49G01 49G02 49G03 49G04

49G01 49G02 49G03


Page 9 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 14,532 12 12,456 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

2 718 2 718 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 2 422 1 211 2 422

0 0 0 0 1 125 0 0

15 10,185 13 8,827 0 0 0 0

9 2,421 6 1,614 0 0 0 0

71 16,472 71 16,472 0 0 0 0

53 10,335 59 11,505 0 0 0 0

266 39,634 263 39,187 0 0 1 149

30 2,760 26 2,392 24 2,208 21 1,932

27 9,477 18 6,318 3 1,053 0 0

30 1,170 32 1,248 1932 75,348 1892 73,788

1472 25,024 1461 24,837 30 510 30 510

74 1,850 69 1,725 157 3,925 124 3,100

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 60 25,380

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 148

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 28 0 0 1 28 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 32 1 32 2 64

2064 134606 2035 127753 2150 83440 2133 105493





49G06 49G07 49G08

49G06 49G07 49G0849G05

49G05


Page 10 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 125 1 125 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 298 2 298 1 149 0 0

1137 104,604 15 1,380 25 2,300 1 92

3 1,053 4 1,404 1 351 1 351

145 5,655 1919 74,841 1902 74,178 4326 168,714

260 4,420 31 527 30 510 103 1,751

99 2,475 143 3,575 72 1,800 133 3,325

0 0 1 1 2 2 56884 56,884

0 0 0 0 4 8 5036 10,072

0 0 0 0 37 15,651 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 3 363 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 28 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 64 1 32 2 64 21 672

1651 119084 2118 82211 2079 95376 66505 241861





49G13

49G09 49G10 49G12 49G13

49G09 49G10 49G12


Page 11 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 125 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 894 2 298 1 149 1 149

1261 116,012 1108 101,936 785 72,220 795 73,140

3 1,053 1 351 1 351 2 702

113 4,407 153 5,967 446 17,394 463 18,057

615 10,455 258 4,386 395 6,715 427 7,259

137 3,425 121 3,025 124 3,100 89 2,225

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

206 87,138 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 2318 64,904 2319 64,932

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 32 1 32 2 64 1 32

2343 223417 1645 116120 4072 164897 4097 166496





49G16 49G1749G14 49G15

49G16 49G1749G14 49G15


Page 12 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 633 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 1,125 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1,358

0 0 0 0 167 44,923 168 45,192

0 0 0 0 40 9,280 41 9,512

1 195 0 0 73 14,235 94 18,330

3 447 2 298 250 37,250 214 31,886

1167 107,364 21 1,932 101 9,292 99 9,108

3 1,053 1 351 24 8,424 13 4,563

158 6,162 1641 63,999 58 2,262 64 2,496

418 7,106 16 272 1819 30,923 1912 32,504

95 2,375 110 2,750 116 2,900 44 1,100

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 96 1 32 1 32 0 0

1860 126556 1792 69634 2649 159521 2653 156078





49G21

49G21

49G20

49G18 49G19 49G20

49G1949G18


Page 13 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019


DP 2,649

LWOP 2,649

MR 1,038

CF

FA 359

FB 218

FC 211

FD 125

L1 679

L2 269

L3 232

L4 195

L5 149

L6 92

PC 351

CM 39

MC 17

XP 25

IF 1

OV 2


JC 176

JD 91

JS 17

JP 146

JM 8

JT 124

JQ 28

CP

PL 121

MF 24

CC 16

CT 148

SC 12

DR

DC 259

DN 39

RS 37

MH 21

AD 49

ES 50

EU 44

EM 9

GU 93

TR 126

PO 28

TS 128

TP 21

MI 32

Total

Minutes 6,377,284

Have 83

Need 82.03

Utilization 0.99

County Total

# of Cases Minutes # of Cases Minutes

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

3 375 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

4 596 3 447

1151 105,892 1388 127,696

3 1,053 1 351

183 7,137 112 4,368

259 4,403 596 10,132

50 1,250 21 525

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

1653 120706 2121 143519

Minutes 120,706 Minutes 143,519

Have 1.44 Have 1.54

Need 1.55 Need 1.85

Utilization 1.08 Utilization 1.20

49G24 49G25

49G24 49G25


Page 14 of 14

Printed: 5/28/2019

Marion County Small Claims Courts - secure.in.gov · Superior and Circuit Courts approved their...

Documents

Transcript of Marion County Small Claims Courts - secure.in.gov · Superior and Circuit Courts approved their...