Marine Renewables Marine Renewables and integrated planning Mike Neilson Director, Marine Scotland...
-
Upload
aron-jennings -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Marine Renewables Marine Renewables and integrated planning Mike Neilson Director, Marine Scotland...
-
Marine Renewables and integrated planning
Mike NeilsonDirector, Marine ScotlandScottish Government
-
Working towards integrated planning
Approach to integrated marine planning
Challenge posed by renewables
How we are tackling it
-
Competing uses
-
Nature conservationMarine Protected AreasProtection for seals and managed controlEcosystem management
-
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT Marine Plan ledEngaging all stakeholdersStreamlined licensingMarine Scotland new integrated department
-
EU framework: MSFD, CFP Habitats
Marine Policy StatementScottish national marine plan
Regional marine plan Authorisation/enforcement/decisions
-
Island communitiesCOMMUNITIES; MARINE PLANNING PARTNERSHIPS
-
Scotlands Renewable Marine Resource25% Europes tidal potential (14GW)
25% Europes offshore wind potential (25GW)10% Europes wave stream potential (7.5GW)
-
Marine renewable energyCompetition with ferry routes and shippingEnvironmental implicationsFishing concernsSynergy with aquaculture?
-
Using the tools
Marine planning
Environmental assessment
Streamlined licensing
Risk-based approaches
-
10 Offshore Wind Sites in Scottish Waters
-
Potential Marine Renewable Areas(Developer Survey)
-
Marine Planning - Seabed Survey (Pentland Firth)
-
Streamlined licensingNavigationDeposit in seaDevelopment consentElectricity generation
-
Marine Renewable DevicesTidal StreamWaveWind
-
Key Issues Device type can lead to different monitoring approaches.
Location and Scale of Development can warrant different approaches.
Sensitivity of the environment a main issue.Development TypeLocation & Scale of Development Environmental Sensitivity BWEA
-
ConclusionsChallenge posed by renewables is pushing us to tackle the difficult issuesHaving a plan is better than not having a plan!Talk early and talk lotsDont let complexity prevent progressLearn to take decisions with imperfect information risk managementIntegration needed at all levels- from EU Commission down
Governance of the sea was fragmented. Different legislation inside and beyond 12 nautical miles.
Scottish Government had responsibility out to the 200 nautical miles (turquoise) defined for fisheries. This is implemented under strict European rules on fishing under the Common Fisheries Policy.
Dark blue is area where Scottish government had control on marine nature conservation, aquaculture, nature conservation, water quality and other developments and impacts.Competition from different marine uses for sea space
Starting at the bottom left- traditional industry is fishing. Coastal communities 20% of jobs depending on fishing. Fish farming value of catch is now greater than fishing. Oil and gas- offshore and on-shore. Ports and harbours. Recreational Activities. Dredging.
Each activity different regulator Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency, oil and gas Department of Energy, Aquaculture, local authorities (elected councillors). Some sectors eg recreation no regulator/champion.
Impacts regulated Navigation- government department responsible for ports and haboursDeposits in the Sea and Dredging- government scientists responsible for fisheries researchDischarges, chemicals, sewage, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency
Sea bed owned by the Crown to maximise revenue
New competition for marine space arises from the opportunities made possible from renewable energy resources.
On shore wind generation mature. Now moving off-shore
Tidal and wave
Increased competition for sea space with existing users.