MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON Assistant Chief … Armas, MCB Camp Pendleton Env.pdf · MARINE...
Transcript of MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON Assistant Chief … Armas, MCB Camp Pendleton Env.pdf · MARINE...
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETONAssistant Chief of StaffEnvironmental Security
ENVIRONMENTALSTEWARDSHIP BRIEF Presented to SAMELupe Armas25 June 2009
25 June 2009 1
MISSIONMISSION
i i k i iUSMC Mission: Make Marines, Win Wars.
MCB CPen Mission: To operate the finest amphibious p pbase possible to promote the combat readiness of Marines and Sailors by…
AC/S Environmental Security Mission: To provide environmental services to the Base … so that operations and training aboard Camp Pendleton are conducted inand training aboard Camp Pendleton are conducted in compliance with environmental requirements and land use availability is safeguarded… Focus ‘output’ to supporting the training of our Marines and Sailors
25 June 2009 2
the training of our Marines and Sailors.
MARINE CORPS BASECAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON
COMMANDING OFFICERCOL Seaton/Col Marano
CHIEF OF STAFF
AC/S LOGISTICS
AC/S FACILITIES
AC/S ENV SCTYWACOLegal Env Support
AC/S OPS&TRNG
AC/S SJA
AC/S COMPAC/S COMP
AC/S C&IS
AC/S MANPOWER
25 June 2009 3
AC/S SES
AC/S MCCS
AC/S Environmental Security
Assistant Chief of StaffL A (YF 03)
Structure
Environmental Compliance Natural Resources
Deputy AC/SLtCol Levi
Lupe Armas (YF-03)
Environmental EngineeringDivision (YF-02)
RCRADivision (YC-02)
Inspection and ComplianceDivision (YC-02)
pDepartment
Andy Entingh (YD-03)
Environmental PlanningDivision (YF-02)
Resource ManagementDivision (YF-02)
DepartmentVacant (YF-03)
Air QualityBranchWastewaterBranchDrinking WaterBranchStorm Water
InstallationRestoration BranchHazardous WasteBranchMilitary MunitionsRule ManagerRemediation
InspectionBranchEnv TrainingBranchPollutionPrevention Branch
Env PlansNEPA BranchProject OversightBranch
Wildlife Mgmt BranchLand Mgmt BranchCultural Resources BranchResource Enforcementand Compliance Branch
Storm WaterBranch
RemediationBranchSpill Prevention andPlanning BranchSolid Waste Manager
25 June 2009 4
* Over 20 Env Medias Managed; MEO Organization (Inherently Governmental Functions); Typically One-Two Deep Per Media.
Southern California Regulatory Context
California lead in environmental ethosCalifornia lead in environmental ethosSo Cal lead within Cal’s environmental enthusiasmHigh regulatory standards and scrutinyg g y yFocus of Public, Media, and NGO interestHigh NEPA litigation probability Last open space in region (higher regulatory/public expectation & oversight)Urban sprawl results in reduced regional resources; whichUrban sprawl results in reduced regional resources; which promotes encroachment on Base’s resourcesExpanding regulations & expanding military mission
25 June 2009 5
p g g p g yExpanding regulations require increase in env funding
Growth in Federal E i t l L i l tiEnvironmental Legislation
Thesis:
5656585860606262646466666868
DMEN
TSDM
ENTS
NAWCANAWCA
FFCAFFCANAGPRANAGPRA
CAAACAAAPPAPPAHMTUSAHMTUSA WRDAWRDA
NEEANEEANHPANHPA
APAAPAOPAOPAWRDAWRDAFEMIAFEMIA ODBA; SPAODBA; SPA
Thesis:
Environmental Laws will Continue to Increase:
- Number of regulations
3838404042424444464648485050525254545656
AWS
AND
AMEN
AWS
AND
AMEN
FEMIAFEMIA ODBA; SPAODBA; SPAFEAPRAFEAPRA AIAAIAWSRAWSRA NWPANWPATSCATSCA
FHSAFHSA
UMTRAAAUMTRAAAFIFRAFIFRA
EPCRAEPCRA
LCCALCCAMWTAMWTA FLPMAFLPMAFCRPAFCRPA
RGIAQRRGIAQR WQAWQAHSWAAHSWAA
- Increasing mandates (e.g. ppm >>> ppb)
Therefore increased liability, requirements, oversight and costs
222224242626282830303232343436363838
E NU
MBER
OF
LAE
NUMB
ER O
F LA EPCRAEPCRA
CERCLACERCLAHSWAAHSWAA
SARASARAUMTRCAUMTRCACWACWA
UORAUORA NWPANWPAARPAARPA
AIRFAAIRFASMCRASMCRA
FLPMAFLPMAHMTAHMTA
ESAESA
RCRARCRATSCATSCA
SDWASDWACZMACZMA
oversight, and costs.Targets:
1) Effective Environmental Program Mgt
664488
1010121214141616181820202222
CUMU
LATI
VECU
MULA
TIVE ESAESA
OSHAOSHAMPRSAMPRSAFIFRAFIFRA
NCANCAMMPAMMPAFWPCAFWPCA
PWSAPWSAWSRAWSRANEPANEPACAACAANHPANHPALWCFALWCFA
FWPRAFWPRA
NWRSAANWRSAA
CAACAA
SWDASWDAFHSAFHSAWPFPAWPFPAFIFRAFIFRA
FDCAFDCAFWCAFWCA
2) Cost-effective Contracting of Services
3) Increase Military Training Flexibility
25 June 2009 6
2200
44 CAACAACAACAAFWCAFWCAMBTAMBTA
19001900 19101910 19201920 19301930 19401940 19501950 19601960 19701970 19801980 19901990 20002000
3) Increase Military Training Flexibility
Environmental Security FunctionsEnvironmental Security Functions
Provide Env program and policy managementProvide Env program and policy managementSupport sustainable military land useProvide compliance oversightProvide regulatory interface Manage Env encroachment factorsImplement Env Management System (EMS) Prioritize Env resource allocationsOversee NEPA policy Promote Env contractingPromote Env contractingMaintain Env GISMaintain Env training & education standards
25 June 2009 7
FY08 Environmental Program $61M
6 40
$34.80
$9.10
$16.40
$9.$0.70
COMPLIANCE NAT RES P2 ERN
25 June 2009 8$ In Millions (exclusive of labor)
Environmental Compliance Department:Compliance, Installation Restoration,
and Env Education
25 June 2009 9
Compliance DepartmentKey Functions/Roles
Compliance Program Development and OversightCompliance Program Development and Oversight
Compliance Project Sponsor and Contract Oversight
Subject Matter Expert for Compliance Programs
Regulatory Liaison and Advocate for Base Compliance Programs
Environmental Reporting and Fee Payment
Pollution Prevention Initiatives
Education and Outreach
Compliance Oversight
25 June 2009 10
Compliance Oversight
Compliance DepartmentFunctional Areas
Pollution PreventionAir Quality
Drinking Water
Training
Storm Water
Waste Water
N liInspections
UST /S ill P ti
Solid/Hazardous Waste
Non-compliance
USTs/Spill Prevention
Clean-up
Military MunitionsInstallation Restoration
12,159 Marines, sailors, and civilians (CPEN & MCAS) received environmental t i i d i 2008
25 June 2009 11
Clean-upRemediation
training during 2008.
Permits & AgenciesPermits & Agencies
Media Agency Permitsg y
Air Air Pollution Control District (APCD), San Diego County *223
Wetlands U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 10
Water Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Diego Region 24
Haz Waste (Facility) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Cal EPA 1
Haz Waste Department of Environmental Health (DEH), San Diego County 50
Underground Storage Tanks Department of Environmental Health (DEH), San Diego County 20Tanks
Solid Waste Department of Environmental Health (DEH), San Diego County 20
Drinking Water Department of Health Services (DHS), Cal EPA 2
25 June 2009 12
* Does not include 2,415 Tactical Support Equipment Registrations
Regulatory AgencyInspections
Media Regulatory Agencies Inspected Days
Air Quality Air Pollution Control District (APCD) -Air (Emissions) Permits-Asbestos Abatement-Vapor Recovery Tests
702010
Drinking Water Department of Health Services (DHS) -Drinking Water System 5
Wastewater Regional Water Quality Control Board -Wastewater Systems 5g Q y(RWQCB) & U.S.EPA
y-Storm Water Permits 5
Hazardous Waste Dept of Environmental Health (DEH) &Dept of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
-HazWaste Storage Sites-USTs
4515
– Over 400 permitted locations (Base, MEF, and contactor operations) inspected annually.
p ( )
Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agent (LEA) & RWQCB -Landfills 12
25 June 2009 13
– 357 inspections were conducted by various regulatory agencies in 2008.– Punitive fines can currently be assessed for both Hazardous Waste and Air Quality violations.
N t l R D t tNatural Resources Department:Conservation, Planning & NEPA,
and Wildlife Management
25 June 2009 14
NATURAL RESOURCES PROGRAMG lGoals
Elements of Ecosystems
READINESS SUPPORT:Integrate Military Training &
Operations as Integral Elements of Ecosystems
Establish Programmatic ESA, COMPLIANCE:
Establish Programmatic ESA, NHPA, CWA, NEPA
Compliance
CONSERVATION:RANGE SUSTAINABILITY:
ASSURE/SUSTAINMISSION & COMPLIANCE
Buffer Acquisition
CONSERVATION:Emphasize Off-Base
Mitigation Banking and Buffer Acquisition
RANGE SUSTAINABILITY:Assure a high quality tng
environment throughINRMP Implementation
ENCROACHMENT MGT:Reduce Environmental
Constraints on Realistic MilitaryMILCON PGM SUPPORT:Facilitate Planning andTRAINING & OUTREACH:
Ad R iti & U d t di
25 June 2009 15
Constraints on Realistic MilitaryTraining & Operations Minimize Mitigation Costs
for Future ProjectsMinimize Mitigation Costs
for Future ProjectsAdvance Recognition & Understanding
of CPEN Mission, Resource Management Requirements &
Achievements
Major ProgramsMajor Programs
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: Endangered Species Act (ESA)NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Migratory Bird Act (MBA); Erosion Control Mgt.; Bison Herd Mgt..
MISSION & RANGE SUSTAINMENT: Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP); Sikes Act.
CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); Archaeological Resources Preservation Act (ARPA).
FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT: Hunting Program; Fishing Program; Rural Camping Program.
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act; Sustainability.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENCROACHMENT: Sikes Act – “No Net Loss”; Buffer Acquisition Authorization.
25 June 2009 16
RESOURCE MGT CONTEXTTh t d d E d d S iThreatened and Endangered Species
Coastal CC
alifornia Gnatcatcher
least Bell’s vireoSouthern Steel Head TroutArroyo Southwestern Toad
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
WesternSnowy Plover Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat
Pacific pocket mouse
Spreading Navarretia
(
California Least Tern
Tidewater GobySan Diego Fairy Shrimp
San DiegoButton Celery
25 June 2009 17
Tidewater GobyRiverside Fairy Shrimp
Camp Pendleton’s Increasing ResponsibilityResponsibility
Riparian– Least Bell’s Vireo - 45%– SW Willow Flycatcher - 11%
Uplands– Pacific Pocket Mouse - 80%
CA G h 28%– CA Gnatcatcher - 28%– Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat - 5%– Riverside Fairy Shrimp - 66%
Estuarine/Beach– CA Least Tern - 20%
Snowy Plover 5%
25 June 2009 18
– Snowy Plover - 5%– Tidewater Goby - 100% SOCAL
HABITAT-BASED MANAGEMENTArundo Managementg
(1996 – To Date)
4800 RIPARIAN ACRES TREATED
900 ACRES OF ARUNDO REMOVEDSan Mateo &
Cristianitos Creek
San Onofre Creek
Santa Margarita River& Deluz Creek
$8.3M (approx $10K/AC)
25 June 2009 21
$ ( pp $ )
5 YR TREATMENT CYCLELas Flores Creek
HABITAT-BASED MANGEMENTExotics Control: Uplands Vegetation
FENNEL
ARTICHOKE THISTLE
25 June 2009 22MUSTARD
HABITAT-BASED MANAGEMENTd C lPredator Control
•Coyotes and striped skunks most frequently removed native predators at least tern and snowy plover nest sites;
•Brown-headed cowbird control in riparian areas
•Beaver control. Not native to southern California. Damages native vegetation and may favor bullfrogs via ponding.
•Non-native fish, bullfrogs and crayfish that prey on native species including arroyo toad and tidewater
25 June 2009 23
goby
T&E Species Trend DataT&E Species Trend DataRiparian & BeachIndicator Species
1000
12001400
16001800
LBV (pr)
CLT(nst)
p
0200
400600
800
1985 1996 2001 2006Western Snowy Plover
R i l T d
100
120
140
1601994199619982002
1985 1996 2001 2006 Regional Trend
Riparian (least Bell’s vireo)Beach (least tern)Note: Both species currently
20
40
60
80
100 2002Note: Both species currently recommended to be downlisted to threatened from endangered.
25 June 2009 24
0BolsaChica
CPEN Bati- quitos Navy- SDBay
SilverStrand
TijuanaSlough
*From USFWS data/brief…Mar’03
EROSION CONTROL
Restoring Base LandsRestoring Base Lands
VICTOR TRAINING AREA
UNIFORM TRAINING AREA
25 June 2009 25
ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROGRAMS E l t R C t
• 95+ percent of Base surveyed
Survey, Evaluate, Recover, Curate
• 600 recorded sites identified• 160 evaluated for National Register • 60 Eligible for National Register• +$2.0M funded over past 3 years for:$ p y
Survey, Evaluation, Data recovery, Analysis and Curation
• Average +50 State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultations per year.
• Sites on Camp Pendleton range in age from 8,000 years BP to present
• Shell middens, milling sites,residential bases, quarries, and rock art
25 June 2009 26
, q ,
NATIVE AMERICAN
• Camp Pendleton consults with up to 19 local tribal governments
CONSULTATION
• Camp Pendleton consults with up to 19 local tribal governments.• Native American monitors are involved on all archaeological projects on the base • Base enjoys an effective and productive relationship with local tribal governments.
25 June 2009 27
Hunting & Fishing Programs2008-09 Season
Hunting Program…($15.00 fee) Fishing Program…($5.00 fee)– (Post 911) Open to Active Duty
& Retired DoD, Dependents and sponsored family members; DoD Civilian Employees *
– Lake O’Neill (open 365 days)– Pulgas Lake [open 27 weekends +
holidays (64 days)]– Case Springs [open 13 weekends]
OceanHunters – 522
Harvest 08/09 Season– Deer 76 (377 tags)
– Ocean
Permits – 2,251
Stocking Lake O’NeillDeer… 76 (377 tags)– Squirrel… 262– Rabbit… 124– Quail… 13– Dove… 510
Stocking – Lake O Neill – Bass (lm)… 118 – Catfish… 2– Sunfish… 97
Crappie 120Dove… 510– Duck… 415– Coyote… 8
– Crappie… 120– Bullhead… 86– Blue gill… 474
25 June 2009 28
Contracted Environmental Services
E l f t t d i
Environmental Services
Examples of contracted services
Water Quality SamplingHazardous Waste Disposal Oil / Water Separator Sediment/Sludge DisposalVernal Pool ManagementFirebreak & Road Erosion ControlArchaeological SurveysExotic Vegetation ControlHabitat Conservation Plan ImplementationHabitat Conservation Plan ImplementationFire Management Plan ImplementationInfrastructure Upgrades & Repairs (compliance)
25 June 2009 29
Contracted E i l S i
E l f t t d i ( t)
Environmental Services
Examples of contracted services (cont)
Flood Plan AnalysisTank Leak Detection CertificationThreatened & Endangered Species Population SurveysAnnual Boiler Source TestingNative American Consultation SupportAerial Photography of Ecosystem HabitatDust Control on Unsurfaced RoadsAnnual Drinking Water Backflow Device CertificationAnnual Drinking Water Backflow Device CertificationSpecies Surveys
25 June 2009 30
GROW THE FORCE NEPAGROW THE FORCE NEPA
NEPA Workload increases in correlation with MILCON budget gGTF NEPA Approach
– CATEX , 50+ construction projects– EA Temp GTF (FY09), 5 projects – EA Permanent GTF (FY10, 11, 12, 13), 43 projects
Utility EIS (FY10 11 12) 8 major projects– Utility EIS (FY10, 11, 12), 8 major projects NEPA Implementation
– CATEX – AC/S ES Staff – EA/EIS - Contract via NAVFAC– Education/Training:
ROICC AcademyContractor Training
NEPA Challenges:– NAVY Policy –
SHPO, FWS consultation complete before FONSI/ROD signatureSHPO, FWS consultation complete before FONSI/ROD signatureFormal Consultation for Endangered Species “may” AffectsNEPA documentation required for MILCON award
– Site Selection– Design-Build Approach
Miti ti l t d t
25 June 2009 32
– Mitigation placement and cost
NEPA DOCUMENTATIONManaging Risk
CO
ST
CO
ST
+
+T $ T $
K
K
++R
ISK
RIS
K++
45 DAYS45 DAYS 18 Mo18 Mo
25 June 2009 33
45 DAYS45 DAYS 18 Mo18 Mo
TIME +TIME +
AC/S ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITYGROW THE FORCE
NOTIONAL MULTI-PHASE WORKLOAD PROFILEW
OR
KLO
AD
WO
RK
LOA
DWW
PrePre--GTFGTF GTF (Planning, NEPA, Construction, & Mitigation ExecutionGTF (Planning, NEPA, Construction, & Mitigation Execution
25 June 2009 34
TIME 4TIME 4--5 years5 years
Green House GasesState & Federal Emergent Regulations
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32)– Goal: restore CA greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to 1990 levels by 2020 (30%
reduction from current projections).– Major Elements:
Mandatory reporting for certain sectors/sources that emit greater than *25 000 metric tonsMandatory reporting for certain sectors/sources that emit greater than 25,000 metric tons of CO2E per year. Data reported requires 3rd party verification. Early Action Measures (currently 44) for specific industrial and municipal operations that can be implemented/adopted by January 2012.Market Based Compliance Measures (i e Cap and Trade)Market Based Compliance Measures (i.e., Cap and Trade)
EPA’s Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 98)– Proposed rule published April 10, 2009; comment period closed June 9, 2009.– Proposes mandatory reporting for certain sectors/sources that emit greater than
25,000 metric tons of CO2 or CO2E per year. EPA responsible for verification of reported data.
– Proposes reporting contingent upon potential to emit vs. actual emissions for some sectors/sources (e g landfills)
25 June 2009 35
sectors/sources (e.g., landfills).
* 2,500 MTCO2E and 1 megawatt (MW) or greater for Prime Electricity Generator(s) and COGEN Facilities…
Strengthening Federal Env, Energy, and Transportation Managementspo o ge e
EO 134231. Vehicles: increase purchase of alternative fuel, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid vehicles when commercially
a ailableavailable.
2. Petroleum Conservation: reduce petroleum consumption by 2% annually through 2015 (fleet vehicles).
3. Alternative Fuel: increase use by at least 10% annually.
4 Energy Efficiency: reduce energy intensity by 3% annually through 20154. Energy Efficiency: reduce energy intensity by 3% annually through 2015.
5. Green House Gases: reduce by 3% annually through 2015 by reducing energy intensity.
6. Renewable Power: at least 50% of current renewable energy purchases must come from renewable sources in service after January 1, 1999.
7. Building Performance: construct or renovate buildings in accordance with sustainability strategies.
8. Water Conservation: reduce water consumption intensity by 2% annually through 2015.
9. Procurement: expand purchases of environmentally sound goods and services, including bio-based productsproducts.
10. Pollution Prevention: reduce use of chemicals and toxic materials through use of less toxic substitutes.
11. Electronics Management: 95% of electronic products purchased must meet EPEAT standards; Energy Star® features enabled on 100% of computers and monitors; 100% reuse/recycle of electronic products.
25 June 2009 36
12. EMS: use as a management tool for implementation, tracking and reporting EO 13423 progress.
Challenges cont’Challenges, cont
GTF Workload and Accelerated SchedulesGTF Workload and Accelerated Schedules
Emergent Stormwater regulationsEmergent Stormwater regulations
State Budget Crisis & Buffer AcquisitionsState Budget Crisis & Buffer Acquisitions
Off-Base Mitigation – Regulatory Approvals andOff Base Mitigation Regulatory Approvals and Credit Cost
25 June 2009 37