Maria's Poster Presentation
description
Transcript of Maria's Poster Presentation
Radar Properties and Block Abundance of Impact Craters on the Moon
Maria Arias de Saavedra BenitezDuke University
LPI Visiting Summer Undergraduate Student
Advisors: P.D. Spudis and S.M. Baloga
Project Goals
• Studying the features of a number of craters with an anomalous radar signal identified by previous work, creating a detailed database
• Contribute to our understanding of how block fields are created in the Moon and how they evolve
• Determine how these craters differ from polar, permanently shadowed craters with similar radar signal but which are candidates for ice
Objectives
• Understand the mechanisms of diffuse backscatter in radar images of lunar craters
• Determine the density of decimeter-scale (~10 cm) rocks in relation to impact craters
• Determine how such rock densities correlate (or not) with Mini-RF measurements of circular polarization ratio
• Use these results to distinguish high-CPR ice deposits from blocky impact ejecta in radar images of the poles
Data Used
• LRO-MRF (S band λ=12.6 cm, 30 m/pixel, 48 incidence) for measuring CPR
• The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Narrow Angle Camera images(0.5-1.6 m/pixel) for counting blocks
Mini-RF Imaging Radar on Chandrayaan-1 and LRO
Mini-RF is a two frequency (S-band (12.6 cm) and X-band (4.5 cm) imaging radar with hybrid polarity architecture
Map both polar regions at 30 m/pixel, 48 incidence
Transmit LCP, receive H and V linear, coherently
Use Stokes parameters and derived “daughter” products to describe backscattered field
Map locations and extent of anomalous radar reflectivity
Cross-correlate with other data sets (topography, thermal, neutron)
Circular Polarization Ratio (CPR)
Ratio of received power in both right and left senses
Normal rocky planet surfaces = polarization inversion (receive opposite sense from that transmitted)
“Same sense” received indicates something unusual:
double- or even-multiple-bounce reflections
Volume scattering from RF-transparent material
High CPR (enhanced “same sense” reception) is common for fresh, rough (at wavelength scale) targets and water ice
Radar Data Collection Procedure
• Identify and collect Mini-RF images from Planetary Database System (PDS)
• Convert images to raw files via USGS “ISIS” imaging software
• Analyze images with NIH “ImageJ” • Record mean and σ for each distribution
CPR Values:Results for Gardner crater
All Floor
Wall Exterior
Rock Count Data Collection Procedure
• LROC and NAC images obtained from Quickmap (LROC image browser)
• Images orthographic map projected with ISIS
• Analyze with feature function of ArcGIS, taking long dimensions of blocks and counting at least ~200 rocks per crater.
• Areas coincide with CPR areas as closely as possible
Gardner Crater Rock Counting
Block abundance in Gardner
Pixel Height: 0.88m; Pixel Width: 0.81m
Data Processing (ongoing)
• Cumulative rock count plotted as a function of diameter• Data trimmed where rollover due to resolution occurs
So far, identified 3 classes of rock distributions (post-impact processes?)
Departure from power law
Ongoing Research
• Modeling fits for extrapolation to smaller rock sizes (wavelength-scale)
• Correlation of decimeter-scale surface roughness with CPR values
Future Results useful for:
• Understanding uneven processes of erosion (high block abundance inside crater, low in the
exterior)
• Understanding radar properties of possible ice deposits in permanently shadowed craters in the poles