March 2009 International Financial Centres in the post-crash era Vanessa Rossi, Senior Research...
-
Upload
lisa-trout -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of March 2009 International Financial Centres in the post-crash era Vanessa Rossi, Senior Research...
March 2009
International Financial Centres in the post-crash era
Vanessa Rossi, Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House
Overview • The global recession and financial storm has
not yet abated – a stress test of survival • The crisis has highlighted the massive
increase in balance sheet risks compared with national incomes
• Iceland marked the end of the “small country-big bank” model of global finance
• Yet banks will become more important as financial intermediaries if saving deposits rise and retail investors shun risk: the “Tokyo scenario”
2
3
World trade smashed by storm
Exports in US $ trillion: 2007 data versus 2009 estimates
• 2009 may be down 20-30% versus 2007 data – larger losses for Japan and the energy exporters
Source: WTO
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
EU (27)
China
US
Japa
nGCC
Canad
a
Korea
Russia
Hong
Kong
Singap
ore
$ t
rilli
ons
2007
2009
Risk averse
High growth and inflation
Low growth and inflation
Investment trends: exodus from risk creates global asset imbalance
Risk taking
The US: “The Anglo Saxon Model”
• US financial wealth was $60-65trn, over 4x GDP
• Under 15% of household wealth in bank deposits, as much as 50% in equities and corporate bonds
JAPAN: Cash
• Wealth $30 trn
•Nearly 55% of household wealth in bank deposits
The EU: “Balanced Portfolio”
• Total financial wealth similar to US
•But household wealth held in equities lower
Holdings of debt, equity and deposits 2008 – shaded areas represent estimated losses in equity values by March 2009
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
US EU (G5+Euronext) Japan China
$ tr
illio
ns
Bond Market
Bank Deposits
Stock Markets
GDP
Wealth losses almost 1 year’s GDP - equities shrink, role of government rises
WORLD FINANCIAL WEALTH TOTAL SHRINKS
FROM $200 TO $160 trillion?
BANK DEPOSITS and CASH around $70 trillion
Larger than world GDP of $55 trillion
EQUITIES - OTHER ASSETSVALUE FALLS
From peak $65 to $35trillion?
GLOBAL TOXIC ASSETS $3-5trillion?
TOTAL BONDSVALUE DOWN FROM $65 to $55 trillion
Government share up from 50% to 60-65%Government debt up, corporate bonds fall
Implications: • Big banks: few “global players”, a cluster in
the US, China and Japan and, arguably, the Gulf region backed also by “oil deposits”
• Europe - cross-border issues? • Other IFCs will have to focus heavily on
financial services with low balance sheet exposure – stiff competition
• London may be the most affected of the major financial centres – this crisis is the banking equivalent of previous restructuring in reinsurance and Lloyds of London
7
Japan’s banks: expand assets abroad liabilities assets
JAPANESE BANK DEPOSITS TOTAL
$10 trillion
PRIVATE SECTOR LOANS $5 trillion
FOREIGN ASSETS $2 tn
LIABILITIES $1 tn
Prudential reserves$0.2 trillion
LOANS TO GOVERNMENT $3 tn
about 35% of Gov Debt
China’s banks: “cash” now mobilised liabilities assets
CHINESE BANK DEPOSITS TOTAL
$6.5-7.0 trillion
PRIVATE SECTOR LOANS $5 trillion
FOREIGN ASSETS $0.3 tn
LIABILITIES $0.1 tn
Prudential reservesOver $1 trillion
LOANS TO GOVERNMENT $0.5 tn
about 100% of Gov Debt
Policy easing
10
Economic ranking by size of GDP – which countries are big enough?
GDP estimates ($ tn)
Rank Region 2007 2017
1 EU (inc UK) 17 25
2 US 14 21
3 Japan 4.4 7
4 China 3.4 12
5-9 Canada, Brazil, Russia, India, Korea
1-1.5 (India) 3
=10 GCC total, Mexico, Australia 0.8-1 (avg.) ~2
World total 54-55 95-100
Comparison of GDP and Stock Market Capitalizations as Shares of World
SWI HK
SGP
CHI EuronextGERUK
J AP
USA
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0%
Market Capitalization (Share)
GD
P (
Sh
are)
Shares of World GDP (%) (chart data at 1990 constant prices, own estimates)
• China the only economy gaining share
• It is the only sizeable contender of the BRICs
• Stock market capitalisations will broadly follow these GDP trends
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
Japan
Eurozone
US
UK China
Japan’s shares in world economy and markets• Japan’s shares in world wealth and other market
indicators much larger than share in global GDP
GDP8%
Broad Money14%
Bond Market15%
World Wealth15%
World wealth held abroad
20%
Stock Market Capitalization
7-9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Japan is the 3rd largest bond market
• Larger share in global bonds than equities: approx 15% versus only 8% share of world GDP and equities
6.88.5 7.8
5.6
18.4
8.4
1.73.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
US EU Japan Rest
$ trillion
Other
Government
Holding of JGBs by foreign investors trend up but still low, close to $0.5 trillion
6.6%
5.8%
6.3%
5.6%
5.1%
5.4%
4.6%4.7%4.6%
5.0%
4.2%4.2%
4.0%
3.0%
3.3%
3.6%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Ho
ldin
gs (
Tri
llio
n Y
en
)
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
Perc
en
t o
f T
ota
l H
old
ing
s
Holdings
Percent
Potential growth in foreign investment in Japanese markets
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2007/2008 2017
($ t
rill
ion
s)
Total Investment
Value of equity investments
High
Low
• High estimate: bond holdings rise to match equity stakes
• Low estimate: no increase in holdings except for modest increase in equity investments based on maintaining share of market
17
The Asian debt market should expand
• Critical to rebalance global asset demand and supply and to fund development in low savings countries such as India, Bangladesh, Vietnam
• Potential to grow dramatically - possibly $1trillion pa?
• Japan would be a key participant here• e.g. Samurai bonds: “rare oasis”
during credit crunch. Froze after Lehman collapse but reopened in February: $2.2bn (Westpac), $1.5bn (Indonesia)
18
MARKET OPINION?
The March 2009 City of London Survey: Tokyo and Sydney drop below top 10
GFCI4 (Fall 2008)
1 London
2 New York
3 Singapore
4 Hong Kong
5 Zurich
6 Geneva
7 Tokyo
8 Chicago
9 Frankfurt
10 Sydney
23 Dubai
27 Melbourne
34 Shanghai
43 Bahrain
45 Qatar
GFCI5 (Spring 2009)
1 - London
2 - New York
3 - Singapore
4 - Hong Kong
5 - Zurich
6 - Geneva
7 +1 Chicago
8 +1 Frankfurt
9 +2 Boston
10 +3 Dublin
15 -8 Tokyo
16 -6 Sydney
23 - Dubai
28 -1 Melbourne
35 -1 Shanghai
19
Recommendations regarding the City of London Surveys• Two possibilities for consideration:• (1) The report may be more widely understood and
accepted as a barometer of IFCs performance and strength if it were to adopt a two-pronged strategy and rankings:• Firstly comparing countries’ leading international
financial centres (ex: London, New York, Tokyo)• Secondly comparing secondary (regional or niche)
financial centres around the world (ex: Chicago, Geneva, Channel Islands)
• This might help focus attention on the most critical factors in the international surveys and underlying changes in view.
• (2) Greater methodological weight could be placed on the size and development of financial sectors rather than on “ease of access” type factors. We agree that it is important to preserve the nuances brought into the survey by the direct personal input of market participants and these are not an issue.
GFCI5 divided into international and secondary centres: more representative
GFCI5 - International
1 London (UK/Europe)
2 New York (US/Americas)
3 Singapore (SE Asia)
4 Hong Kong (China/SE Asia)
5 Zurich (Switzerland/Europe)
6 Frankfurt (Germany/Europe)
7 Toronto (Canada)
8 Tokyo (Japan/Asia)
9 Sydney (Australia/Pacific)
10 Paris (France/Europe)
21
GFCI5 - Secondary
1 Geneva
2 Chicago
3 Boston
4 Dublin
5 Guernsey
6 Jersey
7 Luxembourg
8 San Francisco
9 Isle of Man
10 Edinburgh
Other rankings: looking beyond IFC competitiveness surveys
WEF Financial Development Report 2008
1 United States
2 United Kingdom
3 Germany
4 Japan
5 Canada
6 France
7 Switzerland
8 Hong Kong
9 Netherlands
10
Singapore
PWC – Cities of Opportunity (Financial clout – 11 cities)
1 New York
2 London
3 Paris
4 Tokyo
5 Frankfurt
6 Toronto
7 Chicago
8 Atlanta
9 Los Angeles
10 Singapore
MasterCard – Worldwide Centers of Commerce 2008
1 London
2 New York
3 Tokyo
4 Singapore
5 Chicago
6 Hong Kong
7 Paris
8 Frankfurt
9 Seoul
10 Amsterdam
23
THANK YOU
www.chathamhouse.org.uk/internationaleconomics