March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-1 ECEU692 Subsurface Imaging Course...
-
Upload
howard-beasley -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-1 ECEU692 Subsurface Imaging Course...
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-1
ECEU692Subsurface Imaging
Course NotesPart 14: A Pause to Reflect
Profs. Brooks and DiMarzio
Northeastern University
Spring 2004
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-2
From Our First Lecture...
• Some Examples
• Some Technologies
• NSF Center; CenSSIS at NU
• Taxonomies and Architectures of the Field
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-3
Some SSI Examples• Landmine Detection [Acoustic, GPR, EM, NQR]• Tunnel and Bunker Detection [Acoustic, GPR, EM]• Excavation Planning [Acoustic, GPR, EM]• Luggage Screening [X-Ray, NQR]• Ocean Imaging [HSI]• Breast Tumor Detection and Classif.[X-Ray, US, DOT]• Stroke Differentiation [DOT, MRI]• Functional Brain Imaging [DOT, MRI]• Cardiac Imaging [Ultrasound, EKG]• Retinal Imaging [HSI, Vis]• Vulnerable Plaque in Coronary Artery [Vis, US, OCT]• Fetal Imaging [DOT, Ultrasound]
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-4
Model Subsurface Problems• Problem Geometry
– A* Looking through one material to see another which is below it.
– B* Looking through one material to find inhomogeneities in it.
• Application Areas– 1* Air/Space, 2* Terrestrial, 3* Ocean,
4* Medical, 5* Biological
* Letters and Numbers Refer to Next Slide
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-5
Model Subsurface Problems1 Air/Space 3 Ocean2 Terestrial 4 Medical 5 Biological
Landuse
AtmosphericGasses
LandmineDetection
Pollution Mapping
Dermatology
FunctionalBrain Mapping
ExcavationPlanning
MappingMitochondria
ICM CellCounting
A
B
CORAL CORAL REEFSREEFS
SeabedMapping
River River PlumePlume
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-6
Example Problems for the Course
• Geometries– Semi-Infinite Slab Lab in HW2– Two-Layers HW3– Embedded Object Lab in HW4
• SSI Technology– Hyperspectral Imaging Lab in HW2
• Coursework– Experiments– Analysis
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-7
Some SSI Technologies
• X-Ray• Light (UV, Visible, Infrared)• Ground-Penetrating Radar• Electrical Impedance Tomography• Magnetic Resonance Imaging• Acoustics and Ultrasound• Electromagnetic Sensors• Passive Electromagnetic Imaging• Seismics• Others
~Wavelength
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-8
Different Types of Waves
100
105
1010
1015
102010
-4
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
f, Frequency, Hz.
k/(2
), W
aven
umbe
r, m
-1
Sound
(Real)
DPDW
Light(Real)
(Imag)(Imag)
10059_1
1m
1mm
1km
1mm
mm
cm
m
km
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-9
10471-15-1.jpg
Wave Behavior
• Absorption
• Reflection
• Refraction
• Diffraction
• Interference
• Scattering Thanks to Emmanuel Bossy, BU
Remember HW 1?
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-10
Light in Skin and More
keratinocytes
melanocytes
collagen andelastin
StratumCorneum,5-10m
Epidermis,50-100m
Dermis,few mm
Basal cell cancer (RCM)
Optical Imaging
Vis NIR
Diffusive Imaging
NIRVis
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-11
Probe system
1. Definition & Scope of SSIProbe(s) 1 2 .. I
Medium & object are characterized by physical properties, to which the probe waves are sensitive.
One or more probestransmit one or more waves, which are launched into themedium after processing by some probe system.The waves are characterized by their location, power, frequency, waveform, polarization, etc
One or more detectorscharacterized by theirlocation, sensitivity, or noise, detect the waves after processingby some detector system
1 2 .. J Detector(s)
Detector system
objectMedium
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh, Chair of ECE at Boston University for the concept for this and following slides.
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-12
Examples of wave-dependent properties
• Density• Compressibility
Acoustic
• Dielectric constant• Conductivity• Nuclear spin
Electromagnetic
• Refractive index• Absorption coeff. • Fluorescence
Optical
• Absorption
X-Ray
Electrical/Magnetic
• Conductivity• Permeability
Particle BeamsElectron,Positron,..
• Scattering• Emission of x-ray or• secondary emission
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-13
Density, Porosity, Stiffness Chemical composition, pH Metabolic information Ion concentration Physiological changes (e.g., oxygenation) Extrinsic markers (dyes, chemical tags)
Examples of Underlying Parameters
Goals of SSI• Estimate
– Distribution of Measured Parameters or
– Underlying Parameters Related to Them, or
– Object Shape or Features or
• Detect the Presence of a Target or
• Classify Objects Based on Measured Parameters
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-14
Rough Surface
Inhomogeneous/Layered
MediumMedium
Absorption
Dispersion
Scattering
Diffusion
Clutter
Electro-magnetic
Optical/IR
X-rayAcoustic
CW Pulsed Modulated
CoherentMulti-
Spectral
Classical Quantum
Outside Inside Auxiliary
PartiallyCoherent
ObjectObject
Nonlinear Absorption
ScatteringNonlinear Scattering
DiffusivePhase Object
Depolarizing
Stationary Moving
Absorption Fluorescence
ProbeProbe
Taxonomy of SSI .object
Medium
Surface
Probes Detectors
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa SalehThanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-15
i
ij
Transmitter (Probe) & Receiver (detector) Patterns j
Probe Pattern: Region in the medium occupied by the probe wave, in the absence of the target & clutter
Detector Pattern: Region in the medium to which the detector is sensitive, I.e., , if a source were to exist within this medium, it would be detected.
Architectures of SSI
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-16
1 2 .. I 1 2 .. J
Probe System
Detector System
Interaction regions {ij} are small & do not overlap significantly
Localized SSI Tomograhic SSI
i j
ij
1 2 .. I 1 2 .. J
Probe System
Detector System
i j
ij
LP MVT
Interaction region Vij = region in the medium to which the
signal of detector j is sensitive, when probe wave i is active
Interaction regions {ij} are large & do overlap significantly
Localized vs Tomographic SSI
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-17
Transverse ScanningAxial Scanning
Transverse GazingAxial Scanning
Example i) Distributed Probe/ Localized Detection
LP
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
Example: Photography
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-18
Good transverse resolution Poor axial resolution
LP
Example ii) Localized probe/ distributed (bucket) detection
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
Two-Photon ScanningLaser Microscopy
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-19
Both axial & transverse resolution
LP
Example iii) Confocal probe and detection
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-20
Transverse resolution by scanningAxial resolution by time of flight sectioning
Example iv) Pulsed Coaxial probe and detection
LP
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-21
Computed transverse & axial resolution
MVT
Example v) Axial Tomography
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-22
Generally poor axial and transverse resolution
Example vi) Diffusive Photon Density Waves
Thanks to Prof. Bahaa Saleh
Transmission Reflection
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-23
Generally poor axial and transverse resolution
Example vii) Time-Domain Photon Migration
Transmission Reflection
March 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 10471-14-24
Why Did We Choose What We Did?
• It’s at least somewhat representative of the scope of SSI
• We know it well
• It allows you to explore problems in depth
• It allows you to do some experiments in our labs