MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

19
MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban

Transcript of MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Page 1: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC 21

MAchine Readable Cataloging

Laura Hawley and Cara Orban

Page 2: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC 21

Stands for “machine readable cataloging.”21 is the latest version and refers to the

twenty-first century.Enables computers to interpret the

information found in a traditional cataloging record by way of data, or “signposts” placed before each field of bibliographic information.

Page 3: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC 21

The original version, LC MARC, was created by the Library of Congress in the 1960s.

The LOC maintains MARC 21 to this day.

Page 4: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

HISTORY

Librarians have shared cataloging information long before the advent of computers.

Cataloging sources:

Library of Congress, Cataloging in Publication (CIP), library journals

Page 5: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Computers improve sharing capabilities

The new MARC system allowed libraries to use and contribute records, or simply to purchase computer-printed cards from LOC.

Modern libraries can store MARC records on their online catalogs.

Page 6: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC Regulation

MARBI

• Represents three ALA groups: ALCTS, LITA, and RUSA

• Assures that all types of expertise are considered

MARC Advisory Committee

• Represents national libraries, vendors, and bibliographic utilities

• Discusses proposals for changes or additions

Page 7: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Specifications

LOC created the first edition of this document in 1987.

Provides technical information on MARC records.

Page 8: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Standards

Standards established for exchange of MARC records by floppy diskette, FTP

Anyone who distributes cataloging data should be able to provide standard MARC 21 cataloging in standard format.

Page 9: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC’s Construction

• Divided into sections, beginning with a tag

• Indicators help with form, spacing

• Subfields: staff, lowercase letter

• These fields indicate how the record should appear in the catalog.

245 1 4 +a The stranger

Title Stranger, The

Page 10: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Important MARC fields

020 050 100 245 250 650 800

ISBN # Library of Congress # Personal name Title Edition statement Topical subject Other personal

names

Page 11: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Subfields: can be as specific as needed.

Example:

name main entry a: personal name b: numeration c: title d: dates

100 0_

+aJohn Paul +bII, +cPope, +d1920-2005.

Page 12: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Standardization

To take full advantage of MARC’s sharing capabilities, we must use standardized records.

Sears List of Subject Headings

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Page 13: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Authority Control (from http://authorities.loc.gov)

SOURCE OF HEADINGS: Library of Congress Online Catalog

INFORMATION FOR: Twain, Mark, 1835-1910 Please note: Broader Terms are not currently available

Select a Link Below to Continue...

Authority Record

Scope Note

See Also:  Clemens, Samuel Langhorne, 1835-1910

See Also:  Snodgrass, Quintus Curtius, 1835-1910

See Also:  Conte, Louis de, 1835-1910

Page 14: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC 21 Advantages

The most commonly used system in library catalogs

Easily duplicated and standardized

Improves ease and efficiency, cooperation

Can be formatted for any type of library

Page 15: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Dissenters say:

“There are only two kinds of people who believe themselves able to read a MARC record without referring to a stack of manuals: a handful of our top catalogers and those on serious drugs.” – Roy Tennant

Page 16: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

MARC 21 Disadvantages

Not enough focus on electronic resources

Too complex Redundant English language and

Western oriented

Page 17: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Suggestions

Expand field use for greater searching capability

More focus on electronic resourcesUse complexity to advantageImprove non-English or non-Western

MARC systems

Page 18: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

The Future of MARC 21

Flexibility, reliability, granularity

Partnering with new technologies

Page 19: MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.

Sources

http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/um01to06.html

http://www.statoids.com/wmarchis.html

Khurshid, Z. (2002). From MARC to MARC 21 and beyond: some reflections on MARC and the Arabic language. Library Hi Tech, 20 (3), 370-377.

Tennant, R. (2002). MARC must die. Library Journal, October 15, 26-27.

Yee, M. (2004). New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list. Library Services & Technical Services Abstracts, 48

(3), 165-175.