MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.
-
Upload
philomena-freeman -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.
MARC 21
MAchine Readable Cataloging
Laura Hawley and Cara Orban
MARC 21
Stands for “machine readable cataloging.”21 is the latest version and refers to the
twenty-first century.Enables computers to interpret the
information found in a traditional cataloging record by way of data, or “signposts” placed before each field of bibliographic information.
MARC 21
The original version, LC MARC, was created by the Library of Congress in the 1960s.
The LOC maintains MARC 21 to this day.
HISTORY
Librarians have shared cataloging information long before the advent of computers.
Cataloging sources:
Library of Congress, Cataloging in Publication (CIP), library journals
Computers improve sharing capabilities
The new MARC system allowed libraries to use and contribute records, or simply to purchase computer-printed cards from LOC.
Modern libraries can store MARC records on their online catalogs.
MARC Regulation
MARBI
• Represents three ALA groups: ALCTS, LITA, and RUSA
• Assures that all types of expertise are considered
MARC Advisory Committee
• Represents national libraries, vendors, and bibliographic utilities
• Discusses proposals for changes or additions
Specifications
LOC created the first edition of this document in 1987.
Provides technical information on MARC records.
Standards
Standards established for exchange of MARC records by floppy diskette, FTP
Anyone who distributes cataloging data should be able to provide standard MARC 21 cataloging in standard format.
MARC’s Construction
• Divided into sections, beginning with a tag
• Indicators help with form, spacing
• Subfields: staff, lowercase letter
• These fields indicate how the record should appear in the catalog.
245 1 4 +a The stranger
Title Stranger, The
Important MARC fields
020 050 100 245 250 650 800
ISBN # Library of Congress # Personal name Title Edition statement Topical subject Other personal
names
Subfields: can be as specific as needed.
Example:
name main entry a: personal name b: numeration c: title d: dates
100 0_
+aJohn Paul +bII, +cPope, +d1920-2005.
Standardization
To take full advantage of MARC’s sharing capabilities, we must use standardized records.
Sears List of Subject Headings
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Authority Control (from http://authorities.loc.gov)
SOURCE OF HEADINGS: Library of Congress Online Catalog
INFORMATION FOR: Twain, Mark, 1835-1910 Please note: Broader Terms are not currently available
Select a Link Below to Continue...
Authority Record
Scope Note
See Also: Clemens, Samuel Langhorne, 1835-1910
See Also: Snodgrass, Quintus Curtius, 1835-1910
See Also: Conte, Louis de, 1835-1910
MARC 21 Advantages
The most commonly used system in library catalogs
Easily duplicated and standardized
Improves ease and efficiency, cooperation
Can be formatted for any type of library
Dissenters say:
“There are only two kinds of people who believe themselves able to read a MARC record without referring to a stack of manuals: a handful of our top catalogers and those on serious drugs.” – Roy Tennant
MARC 21 Disadvantages
Not enough focus on electronic resources
Too complex Redundant English language and
Western oriented
Suggestions
Expand field use for greater searching capability
More focus on electronic resourcesUse complexity to advantageImprove non-English or non-Western
MARC systems
The Future of MARC 21
Flexibility, reliability, granularity
Partnering with new technologies
Sources
http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/um01to06.html
http://www.statoids.com/wmarchis.html
Khurshid, Z. (2002). From MARC to MARC 21 and beyond: some reflections on MARC and the Arabic language. Library Hi Tech, 20 (3), 370-377.
Tennant, R. (2002). MARC must die. Library Journal, October 15, 26-27.
Yee, M. (2004). New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list. Library Services & Technical Services Abstracts, 48
(3), 165-175.