MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory...

156
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 1 / 41

Transcript of MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory...

Page 1: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 1 / 41

Page 2: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Outline for Week 3

Chapter 1 Introduction1.1 History of Set Theory1.2 Sets and Standard Notations1.3 Russell’s ParadoxChapter 2 The Axiomatic Set Theory2.1 The Axiom of Equality

ConclusionAssignment 3

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 2 / 41

Page 3: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction

Chapter 1 Introduction

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 3 / 41

Page 4: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction History of Set Theory

1.1 History of Set Theory

Set theory

is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which informally are

collections of objects.

Although any type of object can be collected into a set, set theory is applied most often to objectsthat are relevant to mathematics.

The language of set theory can be used in the definitions of nearly all mathematical objects.

From Wikipedia

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41

Page 5: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction History of Set Theory

1.1 History of Set Theory

Set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which informally are

collections of objects.

Although any type of object can be collected into a set, set theory is applied most often to objectsthat are relevant to mathematics.

The language of set theory can be used in the definitions of nearly all mathematical objects.

From Wikipedia

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41

Page 6: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction History of Set Theory

1.1 History of Set Theory

Set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which informally are

collections of objects.

Although any type of object can be collected into a set, set theory is applied most often to objectsthat are relevant to mathematics.

The language of set theory can be used in the definitions of nearly all mathematical objects.

From Wikipedia

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41

Page 7: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction History of Set Theory

1.1 History of Set Theory

Set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which informally are

collections of objects.

Although any type of object can be collected into a set, set theory is applied most often to objectsthat are relevant to mathematics.

The language of set theory can be used in the definitions of nearly all mathematical objects.

From Wikipedia

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41

Page 8: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction History of Set Theory

Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor Julius Wilhelm Richard Dedekind

Cantor (19 February 1845 to 6 January 1918) was a German mathematician.

Dedekind (6 October 1831 to 12 February 1916) was a German mathematician.

The importance of one-to-one correspondence between the members of two sets (similar).

Defined infinite and well-ordered sets.

Proved that the real numbers are more numerous than the natural numbers.

The existence of an infinity of infinities.

Defined the cardinal and ordinal numbers and their arithmetic.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 5 / 41

Page 9: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

1.2 Sets and Standard Notations

LOGICAL SYMBOLS

NOTATIONS MEANING NAMES

p ∧ q p and q conjunction

p ∨ q p or q disjuction

p → q if p then q conditional statement

p ↔ q p if and only if q biconditional statement

¬p not p negation

p ⊢ q argument of p and q argument

∀x for all x universal quantifier

∃x for some x existential quantifier

∃!x there is one and only one x uniqueness quantifier

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 6 / 41

Page 10: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

STANDARD SETS

NOTATIONS SETS

N {1, 2, 3, ...} the set of all natural numbersNk {1, 2, 3, ..., k} the set of all natural numbers ≤ k

Z {0,±1,±2,±3, ...} the set of all integersZ− {−1,−2,−3, ...} the set of all negative integersZ+ {1, 2, 3, ...} the set of all positive integers

Q {ab: a, b ∈ Z, b ̸= 0} the set of all rational numbers

Q+ {x ∈ Q : x > 0} the set of all positive rational numbersQ− {x ∈ Q : x < 0} the set of all negative rational numbers

Qc {x : x /∈ Q} the set of all irrational numbers

R {all decimal numbers} the set of all real numbersR+ {x ∈ R : x > 0} the set of all positive real numbersR− {x ∈ R : x < 0} the set of all negative real numbers

C {a+ bi : a, b ∈ R, i =√−1} the set of all complex numbers

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 7 / 41

Page 11: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

NOTATIONS OF RELATION ON SETS

NOTATIONS MEANING

a ∈ A a is an element in A or a belong to A

a /∈ A a is not an element in A or a does not belong to A

A ⊆ B A is a subset of B

A ⊇ B A is a superset of B

A * B A is not a subset of B

A ⊂ B A is a proper subset of B

A = B A is equal to B

A ̸= B A is not equal to B

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 8 / 41

Page 12: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

NOTATIONS OF OPERATION ON SETS

NOTATIONS SETS

A ∪B {x ∈ U : x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B} union of A and B

A ∩B {x ∈ U : x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B} intersection of A and B

A−B {x ∈ U : x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B} diffrent of A and B

Ac {x ∈ U : x /∈ A} complement of A

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 9 / 41

Page 13: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

A set is a collection of things.The things in the collection are called elements of the set.

A special notation called set-builder notation isused to describe sets that are too big orcomplex to list between braces. A set X written with set-builder notation has the syntax

X = { expression : rule }.

For examples,the set of all even numbers is

{n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z} or {2n : n ∈ Z}

the set of all odd numbers is

{n : n = 2k + 1, k ∈ Z} or {2n+ 1 : n ∈ Z}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 10 / 41

Page 14: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

A set is a collection of things.The things in the collection are called elements of the set.

A special notation called set-builder notation isused to describe sets that are too big orcomplex to list between braces. A set X written with set-builder notation has the syntax

X = { expression : rule }.

For examples,the set of all even numbers is

{n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z} or {2n : n ∈ Z}

the set of all odd numbers is

{n : n = 2k + 1, k ∈ Z} or {2n+ 1 : n ∈ Z}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 10 / 41

Page 15: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

A set is a collection of things.The things in the collection are called elements of the set.

A special notation called set-builder notation isused to describe sets that are too big orcomplex to list between braces. A set X written with set-builder notation has the syntax

X = { expression : rule }.

For examples,the set of all even numbers is

{n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z} or {2n : n ∈ Z}

the set of all odd numbers is

{n : n = 2k + 1, k ∈ Z} or {2n+ 1 : n ∈ Z}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 10 / 41

Page 16: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

A set is a collection of things.The things in the collection are called elements of the set.

A special notation called set-builder notation isused to describe sets that are too big orcomplex to list between braces. A set X written with set-builder notation has the syntax

X = { expression : rule }.

For examples,the set of all even numbers is

{n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z} or {2n : n ∈ Z}

the set of all odd numbers is

{n : n = 2k + 1, k ∈ Z} or {2n+ 1 : n ∈ Z}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 10 / 41

Page 17: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 18: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}

2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 19: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}

3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 20: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}

4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 21: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}

5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 22: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}

6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 23: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Sets and Standard Notations

Example (1.2.1)

Write out sets in builder form that equal the following sets.

1. {0}2. {1, 2, 3}3. {1, 4, 7, 10, ...}

4. {red, green, blue}5. {a, e, i, o, u}6. {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...}

Solution

1. {x ∈ Z : x = 0} or {x ∈ R : x2 = 0}2. {x ∈ N : x ≤ 3} or {x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 3}3. {3n− 2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = 3k − 2, k ∈ N}4. {color : basic primary colors}5. {English alphabet : letters are vowels.}6. {n2 : n ∈ N} or {n : n = k2, k ∈ N}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 11 / 41

Page 24: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

1.3 Russell’s Paradox

Bertrand Arthur William Russell

18 May 1872 - 2 February 1970

He discovered the paradox in May or June 1901.

He was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician and historian.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 12 / 41

Page 25: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves. So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 26: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves.

So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 27: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves. So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 28: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves. So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 29: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves. So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 30: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

What is Russell’s paradox ?

A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads toa self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

All the men in a village eithershave themselves or are shaved by a barber (himself a man fromthe village). The baber claims to shave only the male villagerwho do not shave themselves. So who shaves the baber ?

If he shave himself , then he do not shave himself .

If he do not shave himself , then he shave himself .

A = {X : X /∈ X}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 13 / 41

Page 31: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

Zermelo’s solution

BERTRAND RUSSELL confounded mathematicians when he published his famous paradox in1903. Bertrand Russell’s discovery of this paradox in 1901 dealt a blow to one of his fellowmathematicians.

Next, Zermelo’s solution to Russell’s paradox was to replace the axiom

for every formula p(x) there is a set y = {x : p(x)}

by the axiom (See axiom of Specification in section 2.1)

for every formula p(x) and every set A there is a set

B = {x : x is in A and p(x)}.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 14 / 41

Page 32: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Introduction Russell’s Paradox

Zermelo’s solution

BERTRAND RUSSELL confounded mathematicians when he published his famous paradox in1903. Bertrand Russell’s discovery of this paradox in 1901 dealt a blow to one of his fellowmathematicians.Next, Zermelo’s solution to Russell’s paradox was to replace the axiom

for every formula p(x) there is a set y = {x : p(x)}

by the axiom (See axiom of Specification in section 2.1)

for every formula p(x) and every set A there is a set

B = {x : x is in A and p(x)}.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 14 / 41

Page 33: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory

Chapter 2 The Axiomatic Set Theory

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 15 / 41

Page 34: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory

Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo

27 July 1871 to 21 May 1953

He was German logician and mathematician.

He finished his doctorate in 1894 at the University of Berlin.

He work has major implications for the foundations of mathematics.

He is known for his role in Zermelo-Fraenkel axiomatic set theory.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 16 / 41

Page 35: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory

Abraham Halevi (Adolf) Fraenkel

17 February 1891 to 15 October 1965He was a German-born Israeli mathematicianHe studied mathematics at the University of Munich, University of Berlin, University ofMarburgHe became the first Dean of the Faculty of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.He is known for his contributions to axiomatic set theory or Zermelo-Fraenkel axiomaticset theory.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 17 / 41

Page 36: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory

What is ZFC and why is it important ?

ZFC → Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with axiom of Choice

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 18 / 41

Page 37: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

2.1 The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.1 (The Existential Axiom)

There is a set at least one.

Axiom 2.1.2 (The Axiom of Extensionality)

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

A = B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

A ̸= B ↔ ∃x [(x /∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 19 / 41

Page 38: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

2.1 The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.1 (The Existential Axiom)

There is a set at least one.

Axiom 2.1.2 (The Axiom of Extensionality)

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

A = B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

A ̸= B ↔ ∃x [(x /∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 19 / 41

Page 39: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

2.1 The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.1 (The Existential Axiom)

There is a set at least one.

Axiom 2.1.2 (The Axiom of Extensionality)

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

A = B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

A ̸= B ↔ ∃x [(x /∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 19 / 41

Page 40: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

2.1 The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.1 (The Existential Axiom)

There is a set at least one.

Axiom 2.1.2 (The Axiom of Extensionality)

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

A = B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

A ̸= B ↔ ∃x [(x /∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 19 / 41

Page 41: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

2.1 The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.1 (The Existential Axiom)

There is a set at least one.

Axiom 2.1.2 (The Axiom of Extensionality)

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

A = B ↔ ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

A ̸= B ↔ ∃x [(x /∈ A ∧ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B)]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 19 / 41

Page 42: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.3)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A = A, (Reflexive)

2. if A = B, then B = A, (Symmetric)

3. if A = B and B = C, then A = C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 20 / 41

Page 43: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.3)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A = A, (Reflexive)

2. if A = B, then B = A, (Symmetric)

3. if A = B and B = C, then A = C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 20 / 41

Page 44: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.3)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A = A, (Reflexive)

2. if A = B, then B = A, (Symmetric)

3. if A = B and B = C, then A = C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 20 / 41

Page 45: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 46: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 47: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = A

Assume that A = B. Then∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 48: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B.

Then∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 49: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 50: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 51: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 52: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C.

Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 53: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 54: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. A = ASince ∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ A) is holds, A = A.

2. A = B → B = AAssume that A = B. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ A).

So, B = A.

3. (A = B) ∧ (B = C) → (A = C)

Assume that A = B and B = C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B ↔ x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ C).

So, A = C.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 21 / 41

Page 55: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.4)

Let A1, A2, ..., An be sets, where n ∈ N with n ≥ 2.

If (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 22 / 41

Page 56: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 57: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step:

It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 58: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.

Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 59: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step:

Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 60: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 61: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 62: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 63: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).

By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 64: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 65: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

Let n ∈ N such that n ≥ 2 and let P (n) be the statement

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 = An), then A1 = An.

Basic Step: It is easy to see that (A1 = A2) → (A1 = A2). So, P (2) holds.Inductive Step: Assume that P (k) holds where k ∈ N with k ≥ 2, i.e.,

if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) , then A1 = Ak .

Next, we will prove that P (k + 1) holds, i.e.,if (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ...∧(Ak = Ak+1), then A1 = Ak+1.

Supose that (A1 = A2) ∧ (A2 = A3) ∧ ... ∧ (Ak−1 = Ak) ∧(Ak = Ak+1).By induction hypothesis, A1 = Ak . By transitive law, it implies that

(A1 = Ak) ∧ (Ak = Ak+1) → (A1 = Ak+1).

Thus, P (k + 1) holds.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 23 / 41

Page 66: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.5 (Axiom of Specification)

To every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whoseelements are exactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

In other word, for every set A, there is a set B satisfying

B = {x ∈ A : p(x) holds }.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 24 / 41

Page 67: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.5 (Axiom of Specification)

To every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whoseelements are exactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

In other word, for every set A, there is a set B satisfying

B = {x ∈ A : p(x) holds }.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 24 / 41

Page 68: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.6)

There is no a set A satisfying

every set x, x ∈ A.

We conclude that there is no a set of all sets.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 25 / 41

Page 69: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.6)

There is no a set A satisfying

every set x, x ∈ A.

We conclude that there is no a set of all sets.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 25 / 41

Page 70: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.

Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 71: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x.

By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 72: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 73: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology,

we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 74: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 75: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 76: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 77: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 78: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 79: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

We will prove that there is a set B such that B /∈ A for every set A.Let A be a set and let p(x) be statement x /∈ x. By axiom of specification, there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x /∈ x}.

Since (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B) is a tautology, we have two tautologies

[B ∈ A ∧ (B ∈ B ∨B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

[(B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B) ∨ (B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B)] ↔ B ∈ A

Consider B ∈ A ∧B ∈ B

B ∈ B → B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B It is impossible.

Consider B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B

B ∈ A ∧B /∈ B → B ∈ B It is impossible.

Hence, B /∈ A.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 26 / 41

Page 80: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 81: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A.

Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 82: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x.

Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 83: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 84: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 85: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique.

Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 86: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.

Then∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 87: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 88: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 89: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.7)

There exists a unique set which has no elements.

Proof .

By the existential axiom , there is a set A. Let p(x) be statement x ̸= x. Theaxiom of specification implies that there is a set

B = {x ∈ A : x ̸= x}.

Since p(x) is not true, B has no element.

Next, we will show that it has unique. Let B1 and B2 be sets which have no elements.Then

∀x [x ∈ B1 ↔ x ∈ B2] is true.

Thus, B1 = B2.

Definition (2.1.8)

The empty set or null set denoted by ∅ or {} is a set which has no elements.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 27 / 41

Page 90: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Take a BreakFor 10 Minutes

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 28 / 41

Page 91: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Subsets

Definition (2.1.9)

Let A and B be sets. Then,

A is a subset of B, denoted by A ⊆ B , if all elements in A belong to B.

In orther word,

A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A → x ∈ B]

A * B ↔ ¬∀x [x ∈ A → x ∈ B]

↔ ∃x [x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 29 / 41

Page 92: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Subsets

Definition (2.1.9)

Let A and B be sets. Then,

A is a subset of B, denoted by A ⊆ B , if all elements in A belong to B.

In orther word,

A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x [x ∈ A → x ∈ B]

A * B ↔ ¬∀x [x ∈ A → x ∈ B]

↔ ∃x [x ∈ A ∧ x /∈ B]

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 29 / 41

Page 93: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.10)

Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. Find all subsets of A satisfying the followingcondition.

1. a single element

2. two elements

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 30 / 41

Page 94: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 95: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 96: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 97: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements

{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 98: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 99: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 100: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 101: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 102: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Solution

A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

1. a single element

{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} and {5}

2. two elements{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {1, 5}{2, 3} {2, 4} {2, 5}{3, 4} {3, 5}{4, 5}

3. two elements and product of them less than 6

{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4} and {1, 5}

4. three elements and sum of them is 9

{1, 3, 5}, and {2, 3, 4}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 31 / 41

Page 103: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.11)

The empty set is a subset of all sets.

Proof .

Since ∀x [x ∈ ∅ → x ∈ A] holds for all A, ∅ ⊆ A.

Theorem (2.1.12)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A ⊆ A, (Reflexive)

2. if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C, then A ⊆ C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 32 / 41

Page 104: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.11)

The empty set is a subset of all sets.

Proof .

Since ∀x [x ∈ ∅ → x ∈ A] holds for all A, ∅ ⊆ A.

Theorem (2.1.12)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A ⊆ A, (Reflexive)

2. if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C, then A ⊆ C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 32 / 41

Page 105: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.11)

The empty set is a subset of all sets.

Proof .

Since ∀x [x ∈ ∅ → x ∈ A] holds for all A, ∅ ⊆ A.

Theorem (2.1.12)

Let A,B and C be sets. Then

1. A ⊆ A, (Reflexive)

2. if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C, then A ⊆ C. (Transitive)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 32 / 41

Page 106: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 107: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 108: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 109: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C.

Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 110: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 111: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 112: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Proof .

1. Reflexive A ⊆ A

Since ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ A) is holds, A ⊆ A.

2. Transitive (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ C) → (A ⊆ C)

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C. Then

∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B) and ∀x (x ∈ B → x ∈ C).

We obtain∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ C).

So, A ⊆ C. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 33 / 41

Page 113: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.13)

Let A1, A2, ..., An be sets, where n ∈ N with n ≥ 2.

If (A1 ⊆ A2) ∧ (A2 ⊆ A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 ⊆ An), then A1 ⊆ An.

Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 34 / 41

Page 114: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.13)

Let A1, A2, ..., An be sets, where n ∈ N with n ≥ 2.

If (A1 ⊆ A2) ∧ (A2 ⊆ A3) ∧ ... ∧ (An−1 ⊆ An), then A1 ⊆ An.

Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 34 / 41

Page 115: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.14)

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.

Proof .

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B ↔ ∀x[x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B]

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A)

↔ A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ A

Theorem (2.1.15)

For any set A, A = ∅ if and only if A ⊆ ∅.

Proof. By theorem 2.1.11 and 2.1.14, they imply this theorem. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 35 / 41

Page 116: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.14)

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.

Proof .

Let A and B be sets.

Then

A = B ↔ ∀x[x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B]

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A)

↔ A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ A

Theorem (2.1.15)

For any set A, A = ∅ if and only if A ⊆ ∅.

Proof. By theorem 2.1.11 and 2.1.14, they imply this theorem. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 35 / 41

Page 117: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.14)

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.

Proof .

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B ↔ ∀x[x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B]

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A)

↔ A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ A

Theorem (2.1.15)

For any set A, A = ∅ if and only if A ⊆ ∅.

Proof. By theorem 2.1.11 and 2.1.14, they imply this theorem. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 35 / 41

Page 118: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.14)

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.

Proof .

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B ↔ ∀x[x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B]

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A)

↔ A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ A

Theorem (2.1.15)

For any set A, A = ∅ if and only if A ⊆ ∅.

Proof. By theorem 2.1.11 and 2.1.14, they imply this theorem. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 35 / 41

Page 119: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Theorem (2.1.14)

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.

Proof .

Let A and B be sets. Then

A = B ↔ ∀x[x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B]

↔ ∀x[(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ B → x ∈ A)]

↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ∧ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A)

↔ A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ A

Theorem (2.1.15)

For any set A, A = ∅ if and only if A ⊆ ∅.

Proof. By theorem 2.1.11 and 2.1.14, they imply this theorem. �

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 35 / 41

Page 120: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 121: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets.

Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 122: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .

By transitive law,A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 123: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 124: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 125: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 126: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 127: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.16)

Let A,B and C be sets. Prove that

if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

Proof .

Let A,B and C be sets. Assume that A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C and C ⊆ A .By transitive law,

A ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → A ⊆ C.

ThenA ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A → A = C.

We obtainC ⊆ B ∧B ⊆ C → B = C.

Thus, A = B = C . �

In other word,

A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A → A = B = C

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 36 / 41

Page 128: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.17)

Give an example(s) such that A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C and C ⊆ B.

1. A = ∅ and C = ∅ and B = {1, 2}

2. A = ∅ and C = {1} and B = {1, 2}

We can choose A,B and C such that A ⊆ C ⊆ B.Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 37 / 41

Page 129: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.17)

Give an example(s) such that A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C and C ⊆ B.

1. A = ∅ and C = ∅ and B = {1, 2}

2. A = ∅ and C = {1} and B = {1, 2}

We can choose A,B and C such that A ⊆ C ⊆ B.Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 37 / 41

Page 130: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.17)

Give an example(s) such that A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C and C ⊆ B.

1. A = ∅ and C = ∅ and B = {1, 2}

2. A = ∅ and C = {1} and B = {1, 2}

We can choose A,B and C such that A ⊆ C ⊆ B.Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 37 / 41

Page 131: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.17)

Give an example(s) such that A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C and C ⊆ B.

1. A = ∅ and C = ∅ and B = {1, 2}

2. A = ∅ and C = {1} and B = {1, 2}

We can choose A,B and C such that A ⊆ C ⊆ B.

Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 37 / 41

Page 132: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.17)

Give an example(s) such that A ⊆ B and A ⊆ C and C ⊆ B.

1. A = ∅ and C = ∅ and B = {1, 2}

2. A = ∅ and C = {1} and B = {1, 2}

We can choose A,B and C such that A ⊆ C ⊆ B.Proof. Assignment 1

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 37 / 41

Page 133: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 134: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 135: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 136: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A.

There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 137: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k.

Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 138: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1.

Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 139: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 140: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 141: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B.

There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 142: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b.

Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 143: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Example (2.1.18)

Let A be a set of all even numbers and

B be a set of all integers can be writen by sum of two odd numbers .

Show that A = B.

Solution

Set up A = {n : n = 2k, k ∈ Z}B = {a+ b : a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1, p, d ∈ Z}

(A ⊆ B)

Let n ∈ A. There exists k ∈ Z such that n = 2k. Choose p = k and d = −1. Then

n = 2k = (2k + 1)− 1 = (2k + 1) + (2(−1) + 1)

= (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = a+ b ∈ B.

(B ⊆ A)

Let n ∈ B. There exists p, d ∈ Z such that a = 2p+ 1, b = 2d+ 1 and n = a+ b. Then

n = a+ b = (2p+ 1) + (2d+ 1) = 2(p+ d+ 1) = 2k ∈ A where k = p+ d+ 1.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 38 / 41

Page 144: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 145: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 146: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 147: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 148: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 149: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Axiom 2.1.19 (Axiom of Pairing for Sets)

If x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

In orther word,given sets A and B → {A,B} ⊆ P for some P.

For examples,

given {1} and {2} → {{1}, {2}}

given ∅ and {1} → {∅, {1}}

given Z+ and Z− → {Z+,Z−}

given {1} and {1} → {{1}, {1}}

given {1} and {{1}} → {{1}, {{1}}}

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 39 / 41

Page 150: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 151: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.

The Axiom of ExtensionalityTwo sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 152: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 153: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 154: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 155: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Conclusion

The Existential Axiom There is a set at least one.The Axiom of Extensionality

Two sets are equal (are the same set) if they have the same elements.

∀x ∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → (x = y)]

The Axiom of SpecificationTo every set A and to every condition p(x) there corresponds a set B whose elements areexactly those elements x of A for which p(x) holds.

x ∈ B ↔ (x ∈ A ∧ p(x) holds )

The Axiom of Pairing for SetsIf x and y are sets, then there exists a set which contains x and y as elements.

∀x ∀y ∃z (x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z)

Subset

A ⊂ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)

A = B ↔ (A ⊆ B) ∧ (B ⊆ A)

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 40 / 41

Page 156: MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 · Outline for Week 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 History of Set Theory 1.2 Sets and Standard Notations ... Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 4 / 41.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Axiomatic Set Theory The Axiom of Equality

Assignment 3 (30 Minutes)

1. Write out sets in builder form (only notation) that equal the following sets.

(a) (EVEN) {1, 2, 6, 24, 120, 720, ...}(b) (ODD) {0.1, 0.11, 0.111, 0.1111, ...}

2. (EVEN and ODD) Prove that for any sets A,B and C,if A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ A, then A = B = C.

3. (EVEN and ODD) Define

A = {n : n = 2k + 1, k ∈ Z} set of all odd numbersB = {a+ b : a = 2x, b = 2y + 1, x, y ∈ Z} set of sum of even and odd numbers

Show that A = B.

Thanatyod Jampawai, Ph.D. MAP1404 SET THEORY: Week 3 41 / 41