Manufacturing Circle Response to the Budget Presentation to the Standing and Select Committees of...
-
Upload
valerie-reed -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Manufacturing Circle Response to the Budget Presentation to the Standing and Select Committees of...
Manufacturing Circle Response to the Budget
Presentation to the Standing and Select Committees of Finance
Parliament of the Republic of South AfricaCape Town6 March 2013
Why is South African Manufacturing Important?
Why is South African manufacturing important?
Multiplier Effect of Manufacturing per R1 investment
Source: PAIRS
Value/Output Multiplier Employment Multiplier
Why is South African manufacturing important?
Multiplier Effect of Manufacturing per R1 investment
Source: PAIRS
Export Multiplier Fiscal Revenue Multiplier
Why is South African manufacturing important?
Ten-year cumulative effects of the economy-wide impact of an increase in manufacturing output
Source: PAIRS
Youth and adult employment ratios in SA and selected emerging market economies
Source: ILO (Key indicators of the labour market, 6th Ed. ), Statistics SA quarterly labour force survey, June 2010
Crisis in Manufacturing
Growth in mortgages to households
Source: sTANLIB
Housing Sector Effect%y/y
Domestic Economic Overview
Source: KPMG
Construction Sector Effect
Mining & manufacturing production and vehicle sales, annual growth, South Africa Jan 2010 – Dec. 2012
Source: Statistics South Africa
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Source: Stats SACompiled by: PAIRS
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Manufacturing growth (%) 1970 - 2010
Source: PAIRS & SARB
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
South Africa’s Deindustrialisation
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1970 1977 1984 1991 1998 2005
Contribution to GDP Trend
Manufacturing Growth and Contribution to GDPManufacturing contribution to GDP (%)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
8001
94
0
19
44
19
48
19
52
19
56
19
60
19
64
19
68
19
72
19
76
19
80
19
84
19
88
19
92
19
96
20
00
20
04
20
08
Tota
l No
n-Agr
icu
ltu
ral
Emp
loym
en
t (1
94
0-1
94
4=
10
0)
Eco
no
mic
Acti
vity
(G
ross
Do
me
stic
Pro
du
ct a
t m
arke
t p
rice
s, c
on
stan
t 2
00
5
pri
ces,
19
40-1
94
4=
10
0)
Economic activity
Employment
LabourRelationsAct (1995)
Employment decoupled from economic growthHas deindustrialisation and the currency played a role?
Employment vs. Economic Activity
Imports and Exports decoupled since Jan 2012
Source: South African Revenue Services
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Source: SARSCompiled by: PAIRS
Poor export performance:Ratio of imports to GDP exceeds that of exports
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Source: SARB, PAIRS Calculations
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Entrenched trade balance deficit throughout 2012
Source: SARSCompiled by: PAIRS
Challenges and Opportunities In the BRICS Context
Manufacturing Imports from Developed & BRICS Countries to South Africa, 1988 - 2011
Source: QuantecCompiled by: PAIRS
Challenges and Opportunities In the BRICS Context
Chinese exports to South Africa, 1999 - 2012
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Source: Statistics South Africa
Manufacturing and Employment in SA
Downbeat Kagiso PMI in much of 2012
Source: BER, Stats SACompiled by: PAIRS
FISCAL POLICY: Tax, Spending and Monetary Policy
Overall Response
• Manufacturing Circle supports counter-cyclical stance• Lower growth leading to lower revenue reducing our ability to maintain this posture• Spending on the productive side crucial – why no mention this year?• Drags on Investor Sentiment:
- Low demand in traditional export markets, - Concerns about SA’s swindling manufacturing competitiveness, - Lack of consensus on the economy (pact between social partners and in constituencies)- Policy co-ordination and coherence (NDP?)- Savings, spending moderation, deficit reduction and debt stabilisation projections precarious
• Tax review cannot take place in isolation of broader macro-economic economic policy• Reports of spending review noted in media welcomed – further reports will be welcomed
- Address steep, bunched-up administered price increases- Target turnaround of financial position of local authorities
• Should trigger monetary policy review as well to better support productive sectors of the economy
FISCAL POLICY
Monetary Policy
IMPLIED EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY, SOUTH AFRICA AND PEER GROUP, 2005 - 2010
Source: Respective statistical bureausNotes: India (2000 & 2009), Fuel, Power, Light and Lubricants; Brazil, Electricity; China, Electricity; Russia, Public Utilities; South Africa, Electricity.
GROSS RESERVES VS. MEASURES OF ADEQUACY, SOUTH AFRICA, 2008 - 2016
Source: Respective statistical bureausNotes: India (2000 & 2009), Fuel, Power, Light and Lubricants; Brazil, Electricity; China, Electricity; Russia, Public Utilities; South Africa, Electricity.
Monetary Policy
Cost pushes and Rand strength
The Rand is currently at 2003 levels, and has strengthened by 23% in the last 10 years.Costs (PPI and Electricity) have increased by between 81% - 231% over the same period
PPI Electricity Rand:USD
% ( Strengthen) / weakening in
Rand2002 13.4% -1.1% 10.502003 2.2% -1.5% 7.54 -28.2%2004 2.4% 2.4% 6.40 -15.1%2005 3.6% 4.9% 6.34 -0.9%2006 7.7% 4.6% 6.75 6.5%2007 10.9% 6.7% 7.04 4.2%2008 14.3% 21.4% 8.25 17.3%2009 0.0% 26.2% 8.40 1.8%2010 6.0% 24.0% 7.31 -13.1%2011 8.4% 25.3% 7.26 -0.7%2012 YTD 6.6% 18.00% 8.11 11.7%Average increase 6.9% 11.9% 7.63Total increase since 2002 81.4% 231.7% -23%
Manufacturing Circle Monetary Policy Position• Currency currently trading at more competitive levels, which supports competitiveness and
maintenance of export levels, but volatility remains high and advantage undermined by domestic policy challenges
• Monetary policy options not a panacea to Manufacturing Growth, but a more stable and competitive currency is an important conducive factor for manufacturing growth
• Current weaker currency = despite policy, not because of it• Manufacturing Circle supports view of the OECD and others that current monetary policy regime
is unsupportive of the productive sectors of the economy, while supporting high interest rates and large budget deficits.
• Current consensus amongst manufacturers = R8.50/$1 – R9.50/$1• How? By employing range of tools in addition to inflation target and interest rates:
- Boost reserves = putting resources down on productive side of the economy- Appropriate capital controls- Macroprudential controls- Employing a periodically reviewed currency band.
FISCAL POLICY
Administered Prices, Electricity & Water
Electricity
Growth Rates of Administered Prices between 2000 and 2010
Source: Respective statistical bureausNotes: India (2000 & 2009), Fuel, Power, Light and Lubricants; Brazil, Electricity; China, Electricity; Russia, Public Utilities; South Africa, Electricity.
Electricity
South Africa vs Brazil
As Eskom readied itself to motivate for further increases at nearly three times the inflation rate (19% for industrial customers) over the next five years, which could lead to increases to consumers as much as 19%, Brazil cut industrial electricity rates by 28% with effect from 2013. NERSA determination a relief, but in effect increases to manufacturing of 10%/11% still above inflation with high municipal mark-ups remaining a challenge
Electricity
Source: EIUG
Electricity
Source: EIUG
On Electricity…
Cost push effects of electricity – how it works
Source: WEF & Frontier Advisory
• South African manufacturers have found it a great challenge to bear the steep, bunched-up increases in the electricity prices against a background of numerous other domestic inefficiencies, the resultant cost-push thereof and our unequal trade position.
• The resultant margin squeeze as well as concerns re future developments in this regard is retarding investment and causing business failure.
• Direct Effects: It raises the baseline cost structure for the local manufacturers, hence reducing their global competitiveness.
• Indirect Effects: Negative effects the shortage of energy has on the mining sector, which is a key source of demand for the local manufacturing activities.
On Electricity…
Specific proposals in relation to Electricity•Recent NERSA determination although still above inflation better accords with the necessity of a longer term and more gradual cost increase trajectory. •The latest price determination exercise as well as Manufacturing Circle discussions have shown that:NERSA was better capacitated to interrogate Eskom price increases, and that Eskom was sensitised to economic growth and job creation imperatives but that it was constrained in terms of the policy framework in which it operates to respond better to industry growth needs for cheaper electricity. •It is proposed that an industrial policy measure to off-set steep, bunched-up electricity price increases be considered as an interim measures to assist manufacturers to adjust.
OnAdministered Prices…
Broader Proposals re Administered PricesThe Manufacturing Circle supports:•idea of a fiscal review in the spirit of how it was mentioned in the 2011 MTBPS, to ensure that the way in which public infrastructure provision is funded and financed and the way in which the associated costs incurred are recouped is done most efficiently and competitively•recommendations of A Study to Collate all Research Done on Administered Prices concluded under the Fund for Research into Industrial Development and Equity in 2011, that:New, up-to-date studies on the regulatory frameworks and processes underpinning the determination of administered prices be commissioned,Greater attention is focused on the economic impacts of administered pricing decisions, The effectiveness of administered pricing in terms of its contribution to national objectives is assessed, The capacity and resources of independent regulators is improved,Benchmarking analyses are undertaken, andGreater attention to alternative approaches for administering prices are given.
Report-back on Incentives
Incentives
Report-backMCEP VERY FAVOURABLY RECEIVED AMONGST MANUFACTURERSMany applications still in differing stagesClarifications on rules and guidelines required in certain instances, but mostly clearDoes not pick winners 60 day turnaround times promised – cause for confidence
CIP / MIDP / EIP / MIPAppropriately structuredTurnaround times of 3 – 8 months – programmes deemed accessibleProposals for quicker disbursement in certain instancesEIP / MIP excludes primary/capital intensive industries due to jobs/R1 considerationReasons not always given for unsuccessful applications
JOBS FUNDRecent presentation received by Genesis AnALYTICSOpaqueness around types of investments likely to succeed, required ZAR investment per job and exclusion of creation of indirect jobs from consideration clarified
THANK YOU