Manish Engineering Works

Manish Engineering Works

TPM REVIEW

17.07.2013

01

VEPL – PP3 5%

Organic Growth

VEPL – WP5 10%

YOKE - Pulsar YOKE – ø 48YOKE – Enfield

BSC - 834BSC - 384 Gears (All)

Drive Shaft Assy.M.Bkt.Assy.

VEPL – WP1 5%

NPD / In-Organic Growth

Gear - 742Gear - 735

VEPL – WP7 20 %

VEPL – PP3 50 %

YOKE - Suzuki

MANISH ENGINEERING WORKS

Company started in the year 1998-99 with press part manufacturing set up

Existing Set Up

Precise set up in one roof for manufacturing components like

1. Sheet Metal Press Components :- Press Capacity in the range of 10 – 60 MT

2. Turned Components :- 10 CNC + 2 VMC + Precise Premachining Set Up like Lathes ,Drilling , Milling, Traub Machines

3. Grinding & Sawing :- Cylindrical Grinding + Band Saw ( Dia 250 MM )

4. Welding & Brazing Assembly : - TIG / ARC / CO2 Welding + Brazing + Riveting

5. Surface Treatment :- Dedicated Set up of Surface Treatment like Powder Coating for Yoke

Product Information Max 2 Slides Category wise

02

Esteemed Customers

02

TPM PROGRESS EXECUTION

Parameter Activities Activities

TPM Policy A] TPM declaration with TPM policy. 29.11.11

B] Education to all employees. 1S- 2S Training Completed.

1S~2S A] No unwanted material. Done.

B] Prefix location, Prefix quantity. Done.

Material

Handling

A] Handling as per agreed norms in

container/Trolley

Plastic Bins

Plastic Bins with partition & Part

wise Qty.B] Elimination of quantity shortages

container should have visual countability.

Customer

Complaints

A] Study of fitment, Aesthetic & Functional

Parameters & implementation of perfect inspection

system for all parts.

All components fitment and

functional parameters known to all

section heads and resp.operators.

B] Cause side Kaizens & Poka-Yokes implementation

& sustenance.

Training given to all & examples

shown.

In-house

Defects

A] Defect stratification by ABC way. -

B] Implementation of countermeasures/Kaizens

following PM analysis way.

Activity in continuations

Delivery

Performance

A] No line stoppages at customer end. No line stoppages

B] Daily/Weekly/Monthly delivery adherence. Daily

TPM Progress Status

Methodology Followed for TPM Implementation

02

PQCDSM – Plant Targets

• 1S 2S Zone Mapping & Leaders

• 1S Top 3 Examples & Results

• 2S Top 3 Examples & Results

• Yoke Cell level Targets as explained by DTJ

• 2012 Tgt vs Act , 2013 Tgt Vs Act

• Yoke Cell Layout before & After ( Block Diagram or sketeches ) with movie of after stating lead time reduction

• Yoke Manufacturing Flow Stage & Photo

• P – Trend of P 1 , P2 , P3 , P4

• P – Approach OEE , Output / Man , Output / Man

• Kaizens P 1 , P2 , P3 , P4

• Q – Trend of Q1 , Q2

• Q – Approach

• Q – Kaizens of Q1 , Q2

• Same way for C , D , S , M

• Summary of Results PQCDSM 2013 Tgt vsMOM Act

• IPO of Yoke Cell for Sustenance of IHR Stage wise IPO sheets with hyperlink

• Linkage of IPO to JH , PM , TBM Sheets ( smallwindow of IPO & big window of JH , PM orTBM sheets

• Horizontal Deployment in other cells

• Plant level Results vs TPM Tgt PQCDSM

• Future Plan

• The Journey Continoues….

02

PQCDSM - Targets

OEE trend :

TPM Declaration

Assessment year 2012-13 Assessment year 2013-14

2012 2013 2013

Parameter UOM BMTRGETMar’13

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR % imprMar'14

(Trgt)Q1'13

(Apr-Jun)

Apr(act)

May(act)

Jun(Act.))

Jul(Proj)

OEE % 67 % 85 % 74 72 71 78 79 77 16% 85 85 72 79% 80% 87%

Output / Man Nos 2996 3500 3525 2526 2715 2879 3156 3442 15% 3800 3200 2975 3013 3224 3200

Output / Hr Nos 368 450 494 403 416 441 426 432 17% 500 450 419 434 464 450

Low Light of 2012-13

● 4% gap in OEE in 2013-13%

ACTION PLAN

Q2 (Jul-Sep)

●How to achieve 90 % OEE in Q2

On Next Slide

03

OEE trend : Cell Wise

OEE Calculation Availability Performance Quality

A P Q OEEPlannedTime Hrs

Actual Time Hrs

GAPProduction

as per Std cycle time

ActualProd

GAPTotal Prod

RejQty

Cell 1 81% 97% 99% 83% 2140 1791 349 93036 74678 18358 74678 97Cell 2 85% 96% 98% 81% 1615 1346 269 198281 160565 3716 160565 142Cell 3 79% 95% 96% 76% 2764 2126 638 163795 121862 41933 121862 134

A:Availability P:Performance , Q:Quality

04

LOSS Contributors :

A

● Line balancing not maintained

● Shot man power and new operators

●no Operator standardization.

P ● CTQ and CTP issues

Q

● Need base training to new operators

● Operator not fixed comp. wise

● tooling/insert adjustment

Cell-1 – BSC 384Cell-2 – Yoke pulsarCell-3 - Other

82%

81%78%

73%

83% 83%

76%

86%

80% 79%

84%81%

74% 75%73%

75%78% 78%

50%

75%

100%

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

Cell 1

Cell Wise OEE

OEE: GAP Analysis (2012-13)

What went wrong : Learning from 2012-13 Detailed Action plan for Each Issue Attached here

05

Issue / Problem/Cause Proposed Solution Who When

1

Problem: setting time

Machine fixed component wise2M/c required for fulfil the qty.

Mr. Gosavi/ Mr. Kishor

Aug.1st

WeekRoot Cause: Frequently job changed

2

Problem: Line balancing

Forging batch Qty. To be increased ( 735-742) Pre machining of 384 to be done 100%

Mr. Gosavi/Kishor/ Aamte

Jun.2nd

Week / July.1st

WeekRoot Cause: Less material stage wise

3

Problem : Operator performance not ok

Root cause : Review of training

Training and review frequently , Component wise operator f to be fixed .

Mr. Gosavi/Kishor/ Shaikh

At the time of Joining & Monthly

excel sheet.xlsx

Target : ● Current OEE :80% 85%

OEE: Action Plan Q2 (Jun & Jul-Sep)

06

Details Proposed Solution Who When

1

Problem: shot man power. 1 Training and new appointments Mr. Gosavi JULY/AUG

Root Cause: absent operators.

2

Problem: running load problem –384/834

Line balancing to be done by 100% Pre-M/c of 384/834

Mr. Gosavi / Patil D.B.

July.1st

Week

Root Cause: stock of material not available

3

Problem: 742 and 735 shortage.Forging batch Qty will have to increase. Mr. D.B. Patil 735-July /

742-Aug.

Root Cause: Less receipt from vendor

excel sheet.xlsx

OUTPUT/MAN


●No consistency & sustenance in OUTPUT/MAN

ACTION PLAN Q2 (Jul-Sep)

●How to achieve 3.4 in next Qtr

On Next Slide

OUTPUT/Hr


● Below Benchmark line

ACTION PLAN Q2 (Jul-Sep)

●How to achieve 500 in next Qtr

On Next Slide

Output /Man & Hrs 07

Output /Man & Hrs : GAP Analysis (2012-13)

What went wrong : Learning from 2012-13

08

Issue / Problem/Cause Proposed Solution Who When

1

Problem: Operator performance not ok

Training to be given about CTQ and CTP

Mr. Shaikh/ Mr. Gosavi

At the time of joining.

Root Cause: New operators

2

Problem: Setting time

Machine fixed component wise

Mr. Gosavi/Kishor/ Aamte

Monthly cell wise/M/C wise.Root Cause: Frequently job changed

3

Problem : No capacity for other component.

Root cause : M/c divided cell wise.

New machine installedMr. M.D.rawke

10/08/2013

● Output/Man : 3.22 k3.4 k ● Output/Hr : 464 500 nos./hr

Output /Man & Hrs : Action Plan Q2

09

Details Proposed Solution Who When

1

Problem: shot man power. 1 Training and new appointments2 Attendance Bonus to be increased

Mr. Gosavi / M.D.Rawke

JUN/JULY

Root Cause: absent operators.

2

Problem: running load problem –384/834

Line balancing done to be done by Pre-M/c of 384/834

Mr. Gosavi / Kishor

July

Root Cause: stock of material not available

3

Problem: 742 and 735 shortage.Forging batch Qty will have to increase. Mr. D.B. Patil

/ M.D.R.

DONE

Root Cause: Less receipt from vendor

TPM Declaration

Assessment year 2012-13 Assessment year 2013-142012 2013 2013



(Trgt)Q1'13

(Apr-Jun)

Apr(act)

May(act)

Jun(Act)

Jul(Prj)

C.C. Occ. No 6 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 83% 0 0 3 1 2 0

C.C. PPMPPM(k) 2978 0 116 606 576 2415 244 81 97% 0 0 300 291 147 0

C.C. Ph. Nos 5 0 5 1 3 2 1 1 80% 0 0 3 1 2 0

● C.C.PPM improvement ( 97%)

● C.C.Phimprovement(80 %)

● C.C.Occr.Improvement(83%)

Action planNext Slide

Observation

Customer Complaint PPM

10

C.C. PPM : Phenomenon/QTY : JUN

PhenomenonCategor

y(R/N)

JanFeb Mar Apr May June

1Gear-670 depth u/s New 0 0 21 0 0 0

2 Gear 561 OD burr REP. 0 0 0 21 49 0

3 Pinion Dia 15.005 + 0.012 u/s New 0 0 0 0 30 0

4 M.Bkt. - ID Bush U/s New 0 0 0 0 0 23

5 M. Bkt (Old)– CD Shift New 0 0 0 0 0 22

● R: Repetitive N: New

11

Details (Top 5) Proposed Solution Who When

1Problem: Gear 5 th pinion Depth u/s Strict inward inspection to be done and

forging parameters to be fixed for forging checking.

Mr. Shaikh Immediate

Root Cause: Forging defect and scaling issue

2Problem: Gear 561 burr placed on OD dia. Die Grinding frequency fixed by

supervisor ( after 2500 nos.) Close monitoring.

Mr. Bharmbe Immediate/Monitoring

Root Cause: Die wear out

3

Problem: Pinion Dia. 15.005+0.012 mm U/S newly development part OD grinding operation added ( 12 micron ) Air gauge ordered for pinion instead of digital micrometer.

Mr. shaikh 30 June

Root Cause: Checked by digital micrometer

4

Problem: M.Bkt – ID Bush U/S Bracket Bush Fitting Pin ø to be increased by 30 micron

Mr.Gosavi July -2nd Week / Under Montor.

Root Cause: Bush fitment Fixture Pin U/s

5

Problem: M. Bkt(Old) CD Shift - Spare Reaming operation introduced for answering PCD Guage

Mr.Patil / Giri Jun-Last Week / Under Montr.Root Cause: Reaming to be done

● C.C.PPM : 147 k0

C.C. PPM : Action Plan

Detailed Action plan for Each Issue Attached here In ● 6W2H format● Effectiveness & Sustenance format

12

6w2h-pinion.xlsx

TPM Declaration

Assessment year 2012-13 Assessment year 2013-142012 2013 2013



(Trgt)Q1'13

(Apr-Jun)

Apr(act)

May(act)

Jun(Act))

Jul(Prj)

In house Rej Occurrences

Nos 14 0 7 6 6 5 5 4 71% 0 0 7 10 9 0

In house Rej PPM

PPM(k)

4512 200 1188 1491 1598 1441 1169 1145 75% 200 0 1410 1152 1125 0

In house RejPhenomena

Nos 12 0 8 8 7 7 5 5 58% 0 0 3 4 4 0

● In House Rej PPM : 75% improvement in yr 2012-13

● How to ach. Q2 trgt 0 (zero)

Action planNext Slide

Observation

In house Rej PPM

13

In house Rej: Phenomenon / Qty: JUN

PhenomenonCategory

(R/N)Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

1 ID o/s – (LAY SHAFT / YOKE ) Repetitive 72 53 126 113 93 62

2 Parallelism – (BSC-384 ) Repetitive 32 22 26 18 19 15

3Total Length u/s – ( LAY SHAFT & YOKE )

Repetitive 42 31 35 38 30 27

4 Cutting u/s – ( YOKE ) Repetitive 48 72 58 60 56 37

● R: Repetitive N: New

14

Details (Top 5) Proposed Solution Who When

1

Problem: ID o/s ( Lay shaft / YOKE ) New tool under monitoring / Back boring Tool for ID M/c.

Mr. Gosavi UnderMonitoring

Root Cause: B type defect / Burr Revolving in ID

2

Problem: Parallelism moreBSC -384 Cutting blank given for facing and ID boring ( Pre machining )

Mr. D.B. Patil Started 15/06/2013 100% from July.Root Cause: Due to U drill force

3

Problem: Total length u/s ( Lay shaft and yoke)

Properly training given to operator about job resting and jaw cleaning..

Mr. Gosavi 1/06/2013

Root Cause: Resting not properly done

4

Problem: Cutting u/s (Yoke )Pipe cutting operators propertraining given to insure no burr at resting face.

Mr. Shaikh 2/06/2013

Root Cause: burr placed on resting face

● IHR .PPM : 1125 k0

In house Rej : Action Plan: Q2

18


Action Plan -IHR.xlsx

Cost

19

Cost

20

TPM Assessment year 2012-13 Assessment year 2013-14

Declaration 2012 2013 2013

Parameter UOM BMTRGET

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR % imprMar'14 Q1'13 Apr May Jun Q2-13

Mar’13 (Trgt) (Apr-Jun) (act) (act) (act) (Trgt)

Power Cost Rs/unit 1.06 1.73 1.67 1.43 1.17 1.22 1.59 -50% 1.75 1.82 1.90 1.73 1.82 1.92

Rework Cost Rs/unit 0.3 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 20% 0.20 0.25 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.20

Consumable Rs/unit 2.08 2.98 2.91 2.24 2.69 2.65 3.65 -75% 4.00 4.08 4.87 3.83 3.53 3.50

cost

TPM Declaration

Assessment year 2012-13 Assessment year 2013-14

2012 2013 2013



(Trgt)Q1'13

(Apr-Jun)

Apr(act)

May(act)

Jun(Act)

Jul(Prj)

Delivery % 100z 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Major Accidents Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minor Accidents Nos 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0

Green Bed Area % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5% 1% 0 0 1% 0

kaizens Emp/mnth - 0.5 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 25% 0.5 0.05 0.2 0.14 0.2 0

Training Hr/emp 1.0 4.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 50% 4.0 1.50 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0

SOB With Varroc % 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 90% 98% 98% 95% 95% 95%

Act With Varroc % 96% 95% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% -

Product UnderDevelopment

Nos - 9 0 0 0 2 1 0 100% 100% 100% - - - 1

Samples Submitted In Time

Nos - 9 0 0 0 2 1 0 100% 100% 100% - - - 1

Sample Accepted First Time

Nos - 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 100% 100% 100% - - - 1

On Time Development % - 100 0 0 0 50 100 0 100% 100% 100% - - - -First Time Right % - 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 100% 100% 100% - - - -

DSM

21

Loss Analysis● TOTAL LOSS IN HRS :

● Total Loss till date (Jan-Jun) : 5235 hrs . (436Shift)

● Monetary Loss : 1650 Rs

● Opportunity Loss : 719813 lacs

*Note : Monetary loss : Operation cost + Manpower cost.Opportunity cost :- Could have produced component in lost time

● TOP 3 LOSSES

Time (Hrs)(Jan-Jun)

% cont

1. Set up & adjustment 2161 526

2. Due to operator 1567 261

3. Management loss 691 115

22

● LOSS TREND TOP 3

● LOSS IMACT :

856.90867.57

888.40

944.52

823.38

855.05

760.00

780.00

800.00

820.00

840.00

860.00

880.00

900.00

920.00

940.00

960.00


334.4

399.6 396.6374.5 360.93

295.22

17.6 9.731.4 42.8

120.4 123.7

252.0274.9 272.1 270.3

249.28 241.68


Managementloss

Due to operator

Loss Analysis: Detailed(Loss in Hrs)

23

334.4399.6 396.6 374.5 360.93

295.22

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

400.0

450.0


Set up & Adjustment Due to operator 17.6 9.731.4

42.8

120.4 123.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0


Mngmnt loss

67.1

42.5

24.0

37.028.70 26.97

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0


Equipment Failure loss

15.4

43.840.8 39.2

32.55 32.55

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0


Tool Change Loss4.8

21.8

55.9

137.4

28.137.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0


Other

149.8

47.1 46.9 43.3

3.5

93.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0


Due to material

15.8

28.2

20.6

0.0 03.51

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0


Trial, inspection & Dev.

252.0

274.9 272.1 270.3

249.28

241.68

220.0

230.0

240.0

250.0

260.0

270.0

280.0


●Set up & Adjustment : 295hrs 0

Action Plan : Losses June

● Management loss : 123 hrs 0

Detailed Action plan forEach Issue Attached here

Causes / Problem Proposed Solution who when

1

Problem: No raw material planningLine balancing done to reduce set up change loss, raw material planning discussed with Mr Gajanan, Material Requirement planned .

Mr. Gosavi ImmediateRoot Cause: Material shortage

Setting change planned As per raw material availability , Training given to supervisor about setting problems and tool adjustment.

Mr. Gosavi Immediate

New sleeve boring bar purchased . Mr. Gosavi Immediate


1

Problem: Material short (BSC-834 ) New vendor added for BSC-384 , Dia 83 20 MNCr5 raw material procured from MukundLtd. ( delivery time only 2 days )

Mr. D.B. Patil

20/07/2013

Root Cause: Delivery late

2

Problem: Material short (BSC-384 ) Forging batch Qty at Mahesh industry increased from 2200 to 4000, Ample Qty. Available at pre m/cning and CNC machining stage.

Mr. D.B. Patil

DONE

Root Cause: Material come from Ludhiyana

25


1

Problem: Lack of man power Skilful and trained operators designated for machine shop , minimum 6 month experienced operators to be selected at the time joining.

Mr.Gosavi

Immediate

Root Cause: New operators

2

Problem: unclean job Clean job provided. machine wise operator fixed. stock material, Allen key and insert provided on the spot. And extra casual provided for job cleaning.

Mr. Patil Immediate

Root Cause: No man for job cleaning

● Due to operator : 241.0 hrs

Action Plan : Losses June

24


JH Status

● JH Plan

● JH as On Today ● JH: Scheduled Calendar

Apr (Bal)

MAY(Done)

JUN(Plan)

JUL(Plan)

Aug(Plan)

JH1 - - - - -

JH2 2 - - 2 -

JH3 2 - - 2 -

26

*JH ACTIVITY SCHEDULE *

12 12 12

1210 10

0

20

0

20

JH1 JH2 JH3

TTL M/C JH StatusJH STATUS :

CategoryName of

M/c JH 1 JH 2 JH 3 Remark

Status Month Status Month Status Month

Machining

CNC-1 Done 5 Feb. Done 8 Feb. Done 10 Feb.

CNC-2 Done 5 Feb. Done 8 Feb. Done 10 Feb.

CNC-3 Done 10-Feb Done 25-Jun Done 25-Jun

CNC-4 Done 10 APR. Done 5-Jul Done 5-Jul

CNC-5 Done 10 APR. pending 15-Jul Pending

CNC-6 Done 25 Apr. Done 30-Apr Done 2-May

CNC-7 Done 15-May Done 18-May Done 20-May

CNC-8 Done 22-May Done 25-May Done 30-May

CNC-9 Done 28-May pending 20-Jul Pending

CNC-10 Done 29-May Done Done Done 1-Jul

VMC-1 Done 15 Dec. Done 20 Dec. Done 22 Dec.

VMC-2 Done 25 Dec. Done 30 Dec. Done 2-Jan

Done 12 10 10

Pending 0 2 2

Total 12 12 12

Moral-Employee Involvement

TOP 2 Kaizen Of The month

2. Theme : To increased productivity KK

Benefit:

1 )Productivity increased by 45 nos.2 ) Cycle time reduced by 35 sec per job.3 ) Insert life increased4 ) Cost saved

27

1. Theme : To reduce IHRQM

Benefit:

1 ) Rework time saved by 30 min.2 ) IHR reduce by 13 nos.

3 ) Production increased by 51 nos.Category OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY June TTL % Contr

JH 1 1 1 2 2 3 10

KK 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 13

PM 1 1 1 2 1 1 7

QM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

SHE 1 1 1 1 3

5S 1 1 3 5

OTHERS 3 2 3

Total 3 4 4 5 2 2 12 9 10 48

Nos of Emp 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 450

kaizen/Empl/Mnth 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.18 0.20 0.11

Kaizen Required 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 225

Kaizen Short fall -22 -21 -21 -20 -23 -23 -13 -16 -15 -177

3 4 4 5 2 2 12 9

0.06 0.08 0.08 0.100.04 0.04

0.240.18 0.20

0102030405060708090100

-0.50

-0.30

-0.10

0.10

0.30

0.50

0.70

3 4 4 5 2 2 12 9 10

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE

Tgrt 0.5 kaizen/Emp/Month

Tgrt 25 kaizen/Month

kaizen-pulsar yoke.xls

Kaizen( Lay shaft).xls

Sawing

Pre-machining

VMC

CNC 4

CNC 1

CNC 2

CNC 3

CNC 5

VMC

Inspection

Dispatch

CNC 10

CNC 9

CNC 8

CNC 7

CNC 6

Entry

RM Storage

Traub 1

RM Storage

Traub 2

Press for Yoke Dimple

For Powder Coating on 2nd Floor

BEFOREPlant layout improvement BEFORE

BSC Yoke

Sawing

Pre-machining

CN

C 4

CNC 1

CN

C 2

CN

C 3

CNC 5

VM

C

InspTable

Dispatch

CN

C 2

CNC 9

CNC 8

CN

C 7

CN

C 6

RM Storage

Traub 1

RM Storage

Traub 2

Press for Yoke Dimple

Lift - For 2nd Floor for Powder Coating

VMC

Plant layout improvement AFTER

BSC Yoke

Business Plan & SOB

28

BUSINESS GROWTH PLAN

8.5514

Yr 2012-13 Yr 2013-14Growth Plan :

● New m/c added : 3 ( Mar’13)

● Expected : 3 Machines (Aug’13)

● CNC-4, VMC-1, Hy. Band s.-1

29

SOB & Turn Over

SOB (12-13) Year wise Performance

Turn Over Values In Cr

Yr 2013-14 Performance

30

5

7

10

14

4.726.64

8.55

2.880

4

8

12

16

20

0

4

8

12

16

Yr 10-11 Yr 11-12 Yr 12-13 Yr 13-14

3 3

4 4

2.88

0

2

4

6

0

2

4

6

Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar

Status :Yr 2013-14

Summary of Business Growth Plan

Gross Sale @

14.00 Crs

63 %

Customer Part NameQty Targeted

( In Lacs ) FY 13-14

Business Targeted ( In Crs ) FY 13-14

VEPL - PP3

YOKE - ( ø48 - Black ) -10 140 4.20 1.82

YOKE Enfield (RE)- 29 520 1.50 0.65YOKE Pulsar- 21 520 10.00 3.08YOKE - SUZUKI 1.50 0.44

VEPL - WP5BSC - VMC Profile -1043384 3.00 2.77

BSC - Cross Hole -1043834 0.50 0.67

OLC- WP-5 (Gears)

Adler Gear 0.50 0.06Gear - 1005 / 06 0.25 0.03Gear - DD 3.50 0.20Gear - 670 2.00 0.11Gear - 561 3.50 0.05

VEPL - WP7Gear - 735 1.00 1.21Gear - 742 0.70 1.20

VEPL - WP1

Drive Shaft Assy - 15 350 2.00 0.19

M.Bkt. Assy. Comp. - 15 340 2.00 0.86

D.Shaft Assy.(Old) - 15 150 0.13 0.01

M.Bkt. Assy. (old) - 15 350 0.12 0.05

Birla & Other B.H. - 521 / other 0.20 0.7036.60 14.10

New Initiatives – Employee Involvement

● Star performer award started for operatorsCategory :1- Attendance incentives , 2 - Productivity award3 - Best Kaizen award,

● Quality campaign carried out.1 - Gauges handling and setting2 - Product knowledge3- Defect wise monitoring

● Safety training campaign arranged.- Safety Aids- Both cell safety alarm provided and Training to all

operators ( mock drill )

31

New Initiatives

31

Best KAIZEN Award Best Productivity on Yoke Cell

GO GREEN ACTIVITY

Sr.No. ACTIVITY TARGET

1) Pre-Treated Water for Toilet & Garden Aug

2) No utilization of Poly Bags Aug

Summary

Journey Continue….

32

Manish Engineering Works

Business

Transcript of Manish Engineering Works