Managing risk in the perinatal period

44
Managing risk in the perinatal period Lessons from the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths Roch Cantwell [email protected] @roch61

Transcript of Managing risk in the perinatal period

Managing risk in the perinatal periodLessons from the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths

Roch [email protected]

@roch61

Risk

1. Risk of occurrence / recurrence

2. Risk of treatment / no treatment

3. Risk of self-harm / suicide

4. Risk of harm to others / harm from others

5. Risk from misattribution / misdiagnosis

6. Risk relate to systemic factors – socio-economic, race, culture, lifestyle, presence of and access to services

7. Risk for 2 individuals

Risk management

Risk minimisation not elimination

Risk in pregnancyBiological

Underlying risk

Stopping/changing medication

Pharmacodynamic effects

Kendell et al, 1987

Wesseloo et al, 2017

Viguera et al, 2000

Risk in pregnancyPsychosocial

Life event!

Contentedness with pregnancy

Planned/wanted

Stage of life

Network of support

Adaptation to pregnancyHigh expectations

Previous experiences of being parented

Postnatal risk

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

pre

_1

04

w

pre

_1

00

w

pre

_9

6w

pre

_9

2w

pre

_8

8w

pre

_8

4w

pre

_8

0w

pre

_7

6w

pre

_7

2w

pre

_6

8w

pre

_6

4w

pre

_6

0w

pre

_5

6w

pre

_5

2w

pre

_4

8w

pre

_4

4w

Pre

gnan

cy

pre

_3

6w

pre

_3

2w

pre

_2

8w

pre

_2

4w

pre

_2

0w

pre

_1

6w

pre

_1

2w

pre

_8

w

pre

_4

w

Ch

ildb

irth

po

st_

4w

po

st_

8w

po

st_

12

w

po

st_

16

w

po

st_

20

w

po

st_

24

w

po

st_

28

w

po

st_

32

w

po

st_

36

w

po

st_

40

w

po

st_

44

w

po

st_

48

w

po

st_

52

w

po

st_

56

w

po

st_

60

w

po

st_

64

w

po

st_

68

w

po

st_

72

w

po

st_

76

w

po

st_

80

w

po

st_

84

w

po

st_

88

w

po

st_

92

w

po

st_

96

w

po

st_

10

0w

po

st_

10

4w

Aad

mis

sio

n p

er

we

ek

Psychosis

Non-psychotic depression Other

Munk-Olsen et al, 2009

Langan Martin et al, 2015

Postnatal risk

Di Floria et al, 2018

Wesseloo et al, 2016

Suicide in the perinatal period

Overall rates - ↓

0.05 SMR pregnancy

0.17 SMR postnatal

(Appleby, 1991)

Small negative association between suicide and being in 1st

postnatal year (Lysell, 2017)

Women with mental illness - ↑↑

70-fold increased rate for women admitted to psychiatric hospital in 1st postnatal year (Appleby, 1998)

Significantly elevated for women with 1st presentation 0-3 months postpartum v. mothers with no psychiatric history (Johannsen, 2016)

Women with postpartum mental disorder - high rates of DSH but lower than those with other mental disorder

Risk of progression to suicide after DSH much higher than in other groups (Johannsen, 2020)

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths

Mostly qualitative methodology

Standardised reports, case note audit, data linkage

Subjects both in and not in contact

Psychiatric data from over 25 years

One of the leading causes of maternal death

Majority have mood disorders

2/3rds received sub-optimal care

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths

Older woman, no past psychiatric historyDay 7 weepy and anxiousDay 11 crisis team involved; agitated; not sleeping;

overvalued ideas of guilt and incompetence

Day 12 midwife has problems contacting psychiatristDay 13 death by violent means

Cause of

death

Past history

Yes No

Identified

Yes

No

Plan

Yes No

Suicide 19 10 9 10 4 5

Cause of death n %

Hanging

Jumping from a height

Cut throat/stabbing

Self immolation

Drowning

Carbon monoxide

Ingesting of bleach

Overdose

Total

9

9

1

3

2

1

1

3

29

31

31

3

10

7

3

3

10

100

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths2015 - RED FLAGS

Key messages

from the report 2015

women

It’s OK to tell

The mind changes as well as the body

during and after pregnancy.

Women who report:

•New thoughts of violent

self harm

•Sudden onset or rapidly

worsening mental

symptoms

•Persistent feelings of estrangement

from their baby

need urgent referral to a specialist

perinatal mental health team

Specialist perinatal mental

health care matters*

morewomen

Mental health matters

Almost a quarter of women who died between six

weeks and one year after pregnancy died from

mental-health related causes

1 in 7 women died by Suicide

23%

Epilepsy

Cancer

Heart disease

Sepsis

Blood clots

Stroke

9 14per 100,000 died up to six

weeks after giving birth or

the end of pregnancy in

2011 - 13

per 100,000 died between

six weeks and a year after

their pregnancy in

2011 - 13

*Mapping data from the Maternal Mental Health Alliance (http://everyonesbusiness.org.uk)

If the women who died

by suicide became ill

today:

•40% would not

be able to get any

specialist perinatal

mental health care.

•Only 25% would get

the highest standard

of care.

INDICATORS OF SUICIDE RISK

Recent significant change in mental state or emergence of

new symptoms

New thoughts or acts of violent self-harm

New and persistent expressions of incompetency as a mother or estrangement

from the infant

32 year old woman with history of depressive disorder, including

depression with suicidal ideation and self-harm after birth of 1st child.

Presented with depressive symptoms to GP 3 weeks after the birth of 2nd child. Commenced on

antidepressants. At review, described return of thoughts of self-

harm.

Referred for psychiatric assessment. DNA.

3 weeks later presented to ED following overdose. MH assessment – range of depressive symptoms but

DSH ‘impulsive’. Discharged to GP care.

6 weeks later presented to out of hours primary care service having

made cuts to wrists. MH assessment – ‘multiple suicidal ideas but no

fixed plans’; self-harm ‘impulsive’. Referred to crisis team.

5 days later note from crisis team –not severe mental illness therefore

no need for engagement.

Suicide 4 week later.

At each stage: (i) What should have been included in the

assessment? (ii) What could have been done differently? Breakout

Symptom pattern / progression

‘Anxiety’ at first presentationLack of recognition of

escalating symptom pattern

Assessments of serial presentations ‘in the

moment’

Use of terms such as ‘impulsive’ and ‘no planning’ when assessing suicide risk

behaviour

Reliance on patient reports despite evidence to the

contrary

CEMD 2015

Thoughts / acts of violent self-harm

Prior history of PND and again after this child

Found on bridge with rope few weeks after birth

A/E – ‘no ongoing suicidal intent’

Local review – ‘death completely unexpected’

Woman with prior depression in postnatal period

CEMD 2015

Estrangement from the infant

GP within 12 days –depressed mood and wishing

baby adopted

Repeated thoughts of ending her life to health visitor

Talked of going overseas, killing herself, not loving

baby but evidence to contrary

Death by violent means within a few weeks of birth

Woman with no prior psychiatric history

CEMD 2015

Other lessonsGrade of assessor

Herald symptoms | Pattern of escalation | Misattribution to

‘normal’ changes

Consideration of inpatient care

Rapidly changing mental state | Violent suicidal ideation | Pervasive guilt | Estrangement from infant |

Psychosis

Partner / family involvement

Knowledge of patient | Lack of understanding of seriousness of

illness

Care by multiple teams

CEMD 2015

Grade of assessor No past history of mental illness

Developed early onset low mood within days of delivering her first baby

Returned to hospital by midwife - appeared

perplexed, not sleeping, vivid dreams of baby being dead,

talked of jumping off a bridge

Casualty doctor found a similar presentation and

referred her for mental health assessment.

Seen by junior members of the crisis team - anxious but with no evidence of clinical

depression or psychosis

Discharged without psychiatric follow-up and died by violent means the next day

Early postpartum death

CEMD 2015

Care by multiple teams

E.g., on three consecutive days:

Day 1 (Team A)

Symptoms of psychosis

Day 2 (Team B)

‘No role’ for mental health team

Day 3 (Team C)

Admission with suicidal thoughts

Seen by at least 5 different mental health teams, each reaching different conclusions

Evidence of psychotic depression in months before death - 2 overdoses with suicidal intent

Woman who died by violent suicide in mid-pregnancy

CEMD 2015

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths2018

Balancing benefits and risks of treatment

Self-harm in pregnancy / early postpartum

Managing complex adversity

Judgements based on social adversity or diagnosis |

Gatekeeping | Avoidance of care | Psychiatric co-morbidities

Benefits and risks of treatment

Past history of anxiety/depression, with depression in a previous

postnatal period

Venlafaxine prior to the pregnancy but stopped on discovering pregnancy - no alternative suggested; no

specialist service within her area

Developed worsening anxiety, then depression - range of physical complaints, poor

coping and suicidal ideation -referred to a low intensity

psychological therapies service

Returned to her GP asking to restart venlafaxine - GP very

reluctant to prescribe, placed responsibility for decision on

the woman, documented explanation of risks, but not

benefits, of medication

She died a week later on the day she was due to undergo a

mental health assessment

Withdrawal of medication in pregnancy

CEMD 2018

Prescribing issues – de-prescribing2018

Self-harm One year history of depressive symptoms

treated in primary care; one overdose pre-

pregnancy

Overdose (incl. alcohol) and laceration to wrists in 1st trimester; attempt to

strangle self in A/E

A/E mental health assessment – no acute

mental illness but possible previous alcohol dependency – no follow

up

Booking – referred to PMHS – referral rejected

– addictions services suggested instead

GP requested specialist PMHS assessment

proceed

Further overdose and attempted self-

strangulation - A/E records note ongoing suicidal ideation – MH

assessment – ‘impulsive’

Death by violent suicide 3 weeks later

Recurrent self-harm in pregnancy

CEMD 2018

Self-harm

Self-harm in pregnancy or the early postpartum period is an unusual event, and should always prompt referral for continuing evaluation,

ideally by specialist perinatal mental health services.

CEMD 2018

Gatekeeping

Prior history of depression and family history of suicide

Engaged poorly with recommendations (for medication

and counselling) to manage low mood in pregnancy

Despite repeated assessments by maternity staff and her GP, it was

felt she did not meet the threshold for referral into

secondary care mental health services

Specifically, she did not score highly enough on standardised

assessment tools used as part of the referral criteria and not all

maternity staff could access direct referral

Violent suicide several months after birth of 2nd child

CEMD 2018

Gatekeeping

CEMD 2018

• Mental health services should work to minimise barriers to care for women in pregnancy and the postnatal period, recognising the need for lowered thresholds and direct access for maternity and primary care professionals.

• Complex care co-ordination should be led by specialist perinatal mental health services where possible and ensure continuity when key workers are absent.

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths2020 – COVID-19 Rapid Report

Multiple referrals with mental health concerns

Lack of face to face assessments

Lack of face-to-face assessments

Referral to PMHS with low mood/difficulties coping mid-trimester

Referral declined –advised self-referral to psychological services

Referral to PMHS in late third trimester with

depressed mood

Appointment offered then cancelled due to

COVID-19

Violent suicide at 6 weeks postnatal

COVID-19 context

CEMD 2020

Breakout

(i) Who needs a face-to-face risk assessment?(ii) What precautions are required for video consultations?

Telepsychiatry Perinatal Mental Health Guidance

• High risk / severe mental state disturbance

• Privacy and confidence• Physical health concerns• Domestic violence• Mother-infant relationship

• Establish confidentiality• Encourage presence of baby• Ensure process for urgent face-to-face or

physical health assessments

Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths2017 – AMBER FLAGS

INDICATORS OF RISK OF RECURRENCE

Any past history of psychotic disorder

Close monitoring if family history / refer if + current

mood disorder

Personal and familial patterns of (re)occurrence

Forward planning for future risk

A woman experienced postpartum psychosis, requiring MBU

admission, after the birth of her first child.

Her delivery had been traumatic with significant blood loss.

At the point of MBU discharge her illness was explained to her as

being due to her traumatic delivery and that she could be

seen in future pregnancy ‘should further problems arise’.

Misattributing risk

CEMD 2017

Forward planning for future risk2017

RECOMMENDATIONS

Following recovery, it is the responsibility of the treating team to ensure that all women experiencing postpartum psychosis receive a clear explanation of:

1. Future risk

2. Availability of risk minimisation strategies

3. Need for re-referral during subsequent pregnancies

Risk information

Risk reduction strategies

Referral in subsequent pregnancies

Other themes

Misdiagnosis/misattribution of physical symptoms

Communication, documentation and information sharing

•Letters (by who?)

•Late pregnancy plan

Risks associated with

•Child protection proceedings/removal

•Child loss

•Delayed/refused termination

Altered thresholds for referral and intervention

Leave and early discharge vulnerability, especially if out of area

Service provision

Substance misuse

•Specialist multidisciplinary engagement

•Drug testing

Education and training for non-specialist staff

MisdiagnosisMarried woman; 1st baby;

no previous psychiatric history

Previously diagnosed auto-immune disease

At 25/40 - increasing malaise

2 days of lethargy, withdrawal, nil by mouth, agitation - attributed to

depression, then collapse

Within 3 weeks - death from pneumonia/encephalopathy

Misattributing to mental health causes

CEMD 2011

MisdiagnosisAortic aneurysm/pulmonary

embolism - Distress/pain attributed to anxiety and

depression

Acute confusional state -Distress/agitation attributed to

postnatal depression

Lymphoma - Weight loss/cough/sweating attributed to

opiate use

TB - Weight loss/loss of appetite attributed to anorexia nervosa

Encephalopathy/SLE - Attributed to depression

Eclampsia - Agitation attributed to depression

Misattributing to mental health causes

CEMD 2011

Misdiagnosis

Misattributing to mental health causes

CEMD 2011

BACK TO BASICS

Risk assessment

• 29 year old woman, referred by health visitor 6 weeks after birth of first child; no past history.

• “Increasingly anxious about caring for her baby, not sleeping or eating, fearful baby will come to harm. Repeatedly making contacting with practice.”

• Seen by CPN – very anxious about baby’s health and development. Worried that baby may not be putting on weight properly and that she isn’t producing enough milk.

• One thought that if she crashed car, both of them would not have to suffer.

• Took extra painkillers but told no-one. Knows she ‘could not go through with it’ because of her baby.

Breakout

Risk assessment

• 29 year old woman, referred by health visitor 6 weeks after birth of first child; no past history.

• “Increasingly anxious about caring for her baby, not sleeping or eating, fearful baby will come to harm. Repeatedly making contacting with practice.”

ANXIETY V. AGITATION?• Seen by CPN – very anxious about baby’s health and development. Worried that baby

may be ill and not be putting on weight properly and that she isn’t producing enough milk.

TYPICAL ‘NEW MOTHER’ CONCERNS V. DISTORTED THINKING?• One thought that if she crashed car, both of them would not have to suffer.

OBSESSIONAL THINKING V. OVERVALUED IDEAS V. DELUSIONAL THOUGHTS• Took extra painkillers but told no-one. Knows she ‘could not go through with it’ because

of her baby.RISK V. PROTECTIVE FACTORS

Risk assessment

• 29 year old woman, referred by health visitor 6 weeks after birth of first child; no past history.

• “Increasingly anxious about caring for her baby, not sleeping or eating, fearful baby will come to harm. Repeatedly making contacting with practice.”

ANXIETY V. AGITATION?• Seen by CPN – very anxious about baby’s health and development. Worried that baby

may be ill and not be putting on weight properly and that she isn’t producing enough milk.

TYPICAL ‘NEW MOTHER’ CONCERNS V. DISTORTED THINKING?• One thought that if she crashed car, both of them would not have to suffer.

OBSESSIONAL THINKING V. OVERVALUED IDEAS V. DELUSIONAL THOUGHTS• Took extra painkillers but told no-one. Knows she ‘could not go through with it’ because

of her baby.RISK V. PROTECTIVE FACTORS

Risk assessment

• 29 year old woman, referred by health visitor 6 weeks after birth of first child; no past history.

• “Increasingly anxious about caring for her baby, not sleeping or eating, fearful baby will come to harm. Repeatedly making contacting with practice.”

ANXIETY V. AGITATION?• Seen by CPN – very anxious about baby’s health and development. Worried that baby

may be ill and not be putting on weight properly and that she isn’t producing enough milk.

TYPICAL ‘NEW MOTHER’ CONCERNS V. DISTORTED THINKING?• One thought that if she crashed car, both of them would not have to suffer.

OBSESSIONAL THINKING V. OVERVALUED IDEAS V. DELUSIONAL THOUGHTS• Took extra painkillers but told no-one. Knows she ‘could not go through with it’ because

of her baby.RISK V. PROTECTIVE FACTORS

Risk assessment

• 29 year old woman, referred by health visitor 6 weeks after birth of first child; no past history.

• “Increasingly anxious about caring for her baby, not sleeping or eating, fearful baby will come to harm. Repeatedly making contacting with practice.”

ANXIETY V. AGITATION?• Seen by CPN – very anxious about baby’s health and development. Worried that baby

may be ill and not be putting on weight properly and that she isn’t producing enough milk.

TYPICAL ‘NEW MOTHER’ CONCERNS V. DISTORTED THINKING?• One thought that if she crashed car, both of them would not have to suffer.

OBSESSIONAL THINKING V. OVERVALUED IDEAS V. DELUSIONAL THOUGHTS• Took extra painkillers but told no-one. Knows she ‘could not go through with it’ because

of her baby.RISK V. PROTECTIVE FACTORS

Interview as therapy

• Understanding the maternity context

• Creating safe space

• Seeing the ‘whole picture’

– Mental state examination is more that what the patient tells you

– Past and family history – relevant but not bound by it

– Personality and coping

• Protective factors

• Instillation of hope and expectation of recovery

Risk management

• Consult with and listen to others

• Risk is dynamic

• Institutional factors

• Recorded management plan that takes into account the maternity context

Where do we go from here?

Messages have become more complex

CEMD acts as indicator of state of health of mental health services in general

Danger of relying on previous notions of ‘distinctiveness’

Focussing only on traditional ‘high risk’ groups

Danger of forgetting old lessons

What constitutes good care

Thorough assessment and evidence of change for this woman

Need to recognise new ‘distinctiveness’ and new challenges

Continuity of care (pregnancy loss; child removal, etc.)

Mother-infant relationship and infant mental health