Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

14
1 Managing Geopolitical Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Risk In Investment Decision Making Decision Making Campbell R. Harvey Duke University and National Bureau of Economic Research Sixth Global Fixed Income Capital Markets/Investment Management Workshop/Retreat July 20-24, 2002 Aspen, Colorado

description

Sixth Global Fixed Income Capital Markets/Investment Management Workshop/Retreat July 20-24, 2002 Aspen, Colorado. Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making. Campbell R. Harvey Duke University and National Bureau of Economic Research. The Risk Setting. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

Page 1: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

1

Managing Geopolitical Risk In Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision MakingInvestment Decision Making

Campbell R. HarveyDuke University

andNational Bureau of Economic Research

Sixth Global Fixed Income Capital Markets/Investment Management Workshop/Retreat

July 20-24, 2002Aspen, Colorado

Page 2: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

2

The Risk SettingThe Risk Setting

• Unfortunately, this case is on the program because of September 11.– Risk management advances have been focused

largely on market risks, i.e. VaR models– Now, there is significant interests in managing

GPR

Page 3: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

3

The Risk SettingThe Risk Setting

• Big picture issues– Is GPR “diversifiable” or “systematic”?– Uncertainty versus risk?– How does GPR fit into an investment

management strategy?

Page 4: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

4

The Risk SettingThe Risk Setting

• Some reading:– Campbell R. Harvey, 1994, “National Risk and Global Fixed

Income Allocation,” with C. Erb and T.E. Viskanta, Journal of Fixed Income.

– Campbell R. Harvey, 1996, “Political Risk, Financial Risk and Economic Risk,” with C. Erb and T.E. Viskanta, Financial Analysts Journal.

– Campbell R. Harvey, 1996, “The Influence of Political, Economic and Financial Risk on Expected Fixed Income Returns,” with C. Erb and T.E. Viskanta, Journal of Fixed Income.

– Campbell R. Harvey, 2000, “The Drivers of Expected Returns in International Markets,” Emerging Markets Quarterly.

Page 5: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

5

The Risk SettingThe Risk Setting

• The U.S. has become much more risky– High sensitivity to some GPRs– Disagreement on strength of economy– Financial information less credible

Page 6: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

6

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Equally-weighted world G-7xUS Switzerland United States

ICRG Political Risk

Page 7: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

7

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Equally-weighted world G8-xUS Switzerland United States

ICRG Political Risk

Page 8: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

8

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

Finland 94.5 Australia 88.0 Hong Kong 80.0Luxembourg 94.5 United Kingdom 88.0 Italy 80.0Ireland 92.5 Belgium 86.5 Cyprus 79.0Switzerland 92.5 Canada 86.5 Czech Rep. 78.5Sweden 92.0 Germany 86.5 Taiwan 78.5Netherlands 91.0 Malta 86.0 United States 78.5Denmark 90.5 Japan 85.5 Poland 78.0Iceland 90.5 Bahamas 84.5 Namibia 77.5Austria 89.5 Spain 83.0 Bahrain 77.0Norway 89.5 Hungary 81.0 Chile 77.0Singapore 89.0 Brunei 80.5 Greece 77.0New Zealand 88.5 France 80.5 U.A.E. 77.0Portugal 88.5 Slovenia 80.5 Slovak Rep. 76.0

Risk Ratings July 2002

Page 9: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

9

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

Risk Ratings May 2001

Netherlands 96.5 Portugal 90.0 Chile 81.0Finland 95.0 Norway 90.0 Slovak Rep. 81.0Luxembourg 95.0 Singapore 89.5 Uruguay 81.0Denmark 93.5 Germany 88.0 Brunei 80.5Iceland 93.0 Japan 88.0 France 80.0Sweden 93.0 Australia 87.0 Qatar 80.0Switzerland 93.0 Belgium 87.0 U.A.E. 80.0United Kingdom 92.5 Malta 87.0 Hong Kong 79.5Canada 91.0 Bahamas 84.5 Poland 79.5Ireland 90.5 Costa Rica 83.5 Botswana 79.0New Zealand 90.5 Italy 83.0 Cyprus 79.0Austria 90.0 Spain 82.0 Czech Rep. 79.0United States 90.0 Slovenia 81.5 Greece 79.0

Page 10: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

10

R2 = 0.2976

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

II Rating

Ave

rage

ret

urns

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

Higher risk means equity investors require a higher rate of return

Page 11: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

11

• Regression equation implies an increase in the medium-term risk premium of 240bp– This helps explain the recent decline in the

equity market– This helps explain the recent behavior of the

U.S. dollar– This helps explain the slow down in real

investment (hurdle rates are up)

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

Page 12: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

12

• Previous CIO “fallen on the sword” because of failure to have detailed contingency plans for GP events – like September 11

• Diamond characterized as “geopolitical planning void”

Diamond Asset Management CompanyDiamond Asset Management Company

Page 13: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

13

• First attempt to develop a strategy

Diamond Asset Management CompanyDiamond Asset Management Company

Page 14: Managing Geopolitical Risk In Investment Decision Making

14

U.S. Has Become a Riskier Global InvestmentU.S. Has Become a Riskier Global Investment

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Jan-

84

Jan-

85

Jan-

86

Jan-

87

Jan-

88

Jan-

89

Jan-

90

Jan-

91

Jan-

92

Jan-

93

Jan-

94

Jan-

95

Jan-

96

Jan-

97

Jan-

98

Jan-

99

Jan-

00

Jan-

01

Jan-

02

ICRG-P Switzerland ICRG-P United States