Managing Conflict - socialstyletraining.com
Transcript of Managing Conflict - socialstyletraining.com
Managing Conflict
Working with SOCIAL STYLE® Series
2 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
VERSATILITY is a service mark of The TRACOM Corporation. The SOCIAL STYLE Model and TRACOM are trademarks of The TRACOM Corporation. SOCIAL STYLE and The Creator of
SOCIAL STYLE are registered trademarks of The TRACOM Corporation.
No part of this manual may be reproduced, transmitted or stored in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior written permission from The TRACOM Corporation.
© Copyright The TRACOM Corporation.
To order additional copies of this guide, go to www.tracomcorp.com or (in the US) call (800) 221-2321 or (303) 470-4900.
WSS1000
Version 2.1
Managing Conflict
3© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Table of Contents
Introduction: Style and Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE® in Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Do Style Differences Play a Role in Conflict? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
The Four SOCIAL STYLES and Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
What Does Conflict Look Like with Each of the SOCIAL STYLES? . . . 10
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Five Key Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Identifying Situations that Lead to Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Evaluate the Likelihood that Conflict Might Occur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Identifying SOCIAL STYLES — Yourself Included . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Understanding Behavioral Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Planning Your Interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Smart Planning Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conflicts as They Occur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Using SOCIAL STYLE to Diffuse Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
The Steps to Minimize Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Applying the Steps to Each of the SOCIAL STYLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Post-Mortem: Repairing the Effects of Conflicts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Repairing the Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Moving Forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
In Closing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47
Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Appendix: Style-Specific Conflicts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Managing Conflict
5© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Introduction: Style and Conflict
In a study that won an award from the National Science Foundation for excellence
in research1, the authors reported that managers spend up to 42% of their work time
resolving interpersonal friction, conflict, refusal to collaborate, and other forms of non-
productive behavior in the workplace. That’s almost half a week focused on nothing but
conflict. And depending on your own place of work, that figure might seem low to you!
Conflict in the workplace is simply a reality. You might be in the middle of a particular
conflict or affected by the conflicts of others. In either case, there are things you can do to
reduce the likelihood, duration and long-term impact of conflicts. This guide is designed
to provide you with specific techniques for applying SOCIAL STYLE to conflict situations
in the workplace.
The guide assumes that you have already attended a training session, been profiled using
a SOCIAL STYLE instrument, and have a solid grounding in both SOCIAL STYLE and
Versatility concepts. It is highly recommended that you review your SOCIAL STYLE and
Versatility Profile Reports prior to reading this guide.
This guide will show you how to use SOCIAL STYLE to:
• Anticipate conflicts and reduce their occurrence
• Deal with conflicts as they arise and head them off before they escalate
• Repair the damage after a conflict has occurred
1 Watson, C., & Hoffman, R. (1996). Managers as Negotiators. Leadership Quarterly, 7(1).
6 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Managing Conflict
7© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE in Conflict
scenario: As the Director of Events for a large trade association, Jay was responsible for
coordinating the staffing plan for the membership convention to be held in two weeks.
This was an important event for the association because it was the only time members
and association staff actually met face-to-face. It was also the most visible part of Jay’s
job. He enjoyed the opportunity to lead such a high-profile project.
In years past, Jay had “borrowed” employees from other departments to help with
tasks such as staffing the member check-in desk and facilitating some of the meetings.
But this year Jay encountered a surprise as he was distributing the individual job
assignments. Ron, a member of the accounting department told him that no one from
accounting would be able to help at the meeting this year. Jay was shocked, as several
members of accounting had been available in previous years. Ron explained that
because the membership meeting had been moved back two weeks, it conflicted with
the deadline for filing quarterly financial documents. Sarah, the Director of Finance, had
made the decision and was firm that all accounting staff were required to successfully
meet the deadline.
Ron could see from Jay’s reaction to the news that he was quite upset. Ron’s apologies
and offers to help “any way he could” did little to calm Jay’s anger. Jay said to Ron, “I
am not sure who she thinks she is, but I am not going to let Sarah ruin this event for
me,” as he quickly hustled off to fix this problem. At this point Ron realized he probably
opened up a can of worms and sought out Sarah to explain.
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE in Conflict
8 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Do Style Differences Play a Role in Conflict?
Most likely you have seen similar situations in your own work experiences. In this case
it appears that Jay and Sarah are quickly heading into a conversation that is likely to end
up causing a full-blown conflict. In some cases conflict arises as a result of fundamental
work issues. In this instance competing demands on the time of the accounting staff
were the root issue. But whatever the initial cause, interpersonal behaviors may cause a
potential conflict to grow into something much larger.
Managing Conflict with Style is a guide to help you deal with conflict using the
proven principles of SOCIAL STYLE. Because every conflict or potential conflict you
encounter will involve multiple people, it also will typically involve multiple SOCIAL
STYLES. And people of each SOCIAL STYLE have preferred ways to act and interact.
Whether you are embroiled in the conflict or on the periphery, your knowledge and skill in
applying SOCIAL STYLE will put you in a position to head off or resolve the conflict more
productively.
From your previous Style training, you’ll remember that Versatility is a measurement of
how effectively you work with others. By applying the information you have learned about
SOCIAL STYLE, you will be improving your Versatility and focusing on the behavioral
needs of others. By communicating with others in a way they most prefer, you can make
them more comfortable when tensions are rising, which can help to head-off conflicts and
effectively deal with them as they occur.
Of course even the most adept use of SOCIAL STYLE can’t eliminate all workplace
conflict. Conflict can come from sources that are outside of the control of the people
involved. Yet even when a conflict is not originally based on interpersonal differences,
such differences frequently contribute to and exacerbate conflict. This guide will help
ensure that your Style behaviors don’t lead to conflict and show you how they can even
help move conflicts to successful resolution. It will teach how to take such behavioral
issues “off the table,” so you can focus on the underlying challenges. Because you have
previously been trained in SOCIAL STYLE and Versatility concepts, this guide does not
discuss them in detail, but rather shows how those concepts can be applied in various
conflict situations.
Since the SOCIAL STYLE ModelTM was developed in the 1960s, thousands of
organizations have used Style and Versatility to improve organizational and
interpersonal productivity, including dealing effectively with conflict. In a recent
survey of SOCIAL STYLE program participants, just over 95% of them said applying the
knowledge they learned would help to reduce conflict in their workplace.
Managing Conflict
9© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
scenario: By the time Jay got back to his desk he was furious. He thought the filing
deadline sounded like an excuse not to help with the conference and he was ready to
fight this one out. Without hesitation he immediately phoned Sarah. She clearly didn’t
understand the importance of this meeting, and he was determined to educate her.
When she didn’t answer he left an abrupt voice mail message letting Sarah know how
he felt about the situation. He then followed up with an e-mail message essentially
demanding that accounting staff be available for the meeting, or he would take the issue
to the association’s Chief Operating Officer.
Sarah was not in her office when Jay called because she was involved with a previously
scheduled meeting. In fact, Sarah didn’t learn of the brewing conflict until Ron found her
later in the morning. While Ron was clearly worried about the situation, Sarah was not
fazed. After all, she thought, any business person can understand the importance of
meeting the filing deadline. Nobody would expect anything less than efficient compliance.
She printed out a copy of the department procedures and her calendar and made plans
to see Jay after completing her weekly review with the audit department.
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE in Conflict
10 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The Four SOCIAL STYLES and Conflict
You will recall from your SOCIAL STYLE training that there are fundamental differences
in the preferred way each of the four SOCIAL STYLES behaves, talks, uses time, works
with others and makes decisions. While it may not yet be apparent to either Jay or Sarah,
they have different SOCIAL STYLES and thus, different preferred patterns of behavior.
During the best of times, when stress is not too high and things are generally running
smoothly, our Style differences don’t cause major issues. We and our co-workers can go
about our business, relying on our comfortable ways of getting things done. In fact, we are
barely aware of these differences, and we may consider other people’s behavioral Styles
as only minor inconveniences to our own way of doing things. However, as stress mounts,
especially when we have to work closely with others, our Styles become more noticeable
and more apt to enhance conflict.
When a tense situation arises or an interaction becomes uncomfortable, people will rely
even more on their preferred patterns of behavior to solve the problem at hand. If both
parties are focused on their own needs and not the other person’s needs, tension will
grow. This mounting tension will often lead to or greatly contribute to a conflict between
individuals. The specific triggers of tension vary by SOCIAL STYLE.
Be aware that even if you do not perceive a conflict, but another person believes there is a
conflict, then a conflict exists. Even if the conflict did not begin as an interpersonal dispute,
behavioral Style differences can turn a minor issue into a much more difficult situation. Your
ability to effectively use SOCIAL STYLE skills can remove personal behavioral preferences
from a situation, allowing you to focus on the underlying issues at hand.
What Does Conflict Look Like with Each of the SOCIAL STYLES?
Let’s now review each SOCIAL STYLE to see how they deal with conflict through their
preferred actions toward others, use of time and approach to decision-making. By doing
this you will begin to understand how to use your knowledge of Style to prepare for
potential conflicts, thus minimizing or even averting them. For those conflicts that are
inevitable, you will be able to use Style awareness to more effectively manage the tension
while in the heat of the moment, and create productive outcomes.
Managing Conflict
11© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Need: Results Growth Action: To Listen
Orientation: Action Backup Behavior: Autocratic — Takes Control
Driving Style people are focused on achieving results and believe that action
is the best way to succeed. They are typically not seen as concerned about
relationships and people except as they relate to the overall goal. Other people
may consider the Driving person to be impersonal, practical and dominating.
Driving Style people have little tolerance for discussions they deem a waste of time.
They prefer getting to the point and staying on target. They like to have an agenda
and stick to it. Straying from a focus will cause frustration and tension. Though
always focused, Driving people may “warm up” to others after real progress has
been achieved.
When making a decision, Driving Style people prefer to be provided with the
facts and viable options. They enjoy having control and making their own
decisions. They are likely to choose options with a good probability of success,
but are willing to accept risk to advance a project.
In times of tension, Driving Style people are likely to attempt to take control.
They may say things like “I’ll just do it myself” or they might start making
autocratic decisions. These efforts to take control represent their Backup
Behavior as a result of the tension they are experiencing.
What Does Conflict with a Driving Style Person Look Like?
Driving Style people will not hesitate to tell you that there is a problem. They will be
direct and, potentially, verbally confrontational. Because they are feeling a need to be
in control, they might try to take charge of the situation by telling you what to do or
what needs to be done, according to them. Driving Style people are likely to be brusque
and come across as not very concerned with you as a person, or the impact that the
confrontation has on you. Their method of telling you what needs to be done can often
come across as highly critical and even personal. They are likely to dominate the
conversation, at least initially, and will want to say what is on their mind before giving
you a chance to speak. If highly stressed, Driving Style people tend to raise their voices
and will use forward body posture while making their points. Their eye contact will be
direct, and though Driving Style people don’t often use their hands when talking, in such
circumstances they may point fingers or tap on tables when making their arguments.
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE in Conflict
12 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Need: Personal Approval Growth Action: To Check
Orientation: Spontaneity Backup Behavior: Attacks — Verbally Confrontational
Expressive Style people typically focus on spontaneity and recognition. They
like to be at the center of activity, but don’t typically focus on one thing for too
long. They generally approach situations in a casual manner and tend to get
along well with others who support their ideas. Expressive Style people are
frequently big-picture thinkers who prefer not to deal with all the details.
Expressive Style people like to spend time exploring ideas. They do not like
to be rushed to action, but are likely to change course unexpectedly. They see
agendas and timetables as guidelines rather than rules.
The Expressive Style person is willing to take risks to achieve big successes.
Decisions can be made based on the potential benefits or rewards rather than
facts or logic, and he or she makes decisions quickly. The opinions of others are
important factors when making decisions.
In times of tension, the Expressive Style person can become combative or
argumentative with others. This Backup Behavior is the way of dealing with the
disagreement and maintaining a high-profile role in the situation.
What Does Conflict with an Expressive Style Person Look Like?
It will be apparent when you’re in conflict with an Expressive Style person. Remember
that his or her natural Backup Behavior is to attack. This person will be blunt and
possibly very personal in his or her attack. In some cases they can come across as
irrational, and will bring up issues that are unrelated to the matter at hand. When
on the attack, this Style of person will usually be very animated, and any frustration
will be clear through their facial expressions and use of hands and body. His or her
tone of voice is generally loud, and this person can sometimes make a “scene” that
is uncomfortable for the other Styles. The Expressive Style person will often take
criticisms personally, which can add to their tension.
Managing Conflict
13© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Need: Personal Security Growth Action: To Initiate
Orientation: Relationships Backup Behavior: Acquiesces — Appears to Give In
Amiable Style people are focused on relationships and personal security. They
are friendly and committed to working with others. They are the most “people-
oriented” of the Styles. They enjoy collaborating with others and want a
friendly, comfortable workplace. They are open to sharing personal information
with others and tend to take the comments and actions of others personally.
Amiable Style people tend to work more slowly and with less discipline. They
want to allow time for socialization and make sure everyone has a chance to
contribute. Thus, their decision process can be influenced by others, even if they
are not formally part of the group.
Amiable people are not risk-takers and want to ensure that decisions will not
affect personal relationships. The safe choice is often preferred by the Amiable
person.
Because of their emphasis on maintaining positive relationships, Amiable Style
people are likely to give in or acquiesce during times of tension rather than
rock the boat. This does not mean that the conflict is over. By staying quiet this
person has not agreed to anything.
What does Conflict with an Amiable Style Person Look Like?
It may be difficult to tell when you’re in a conflict with an Amiable Style person.
Although their signs of tension might not always be obvious, they sometimes display
their discomfort by staying quiet and avoiding eye contact. While normally friendly, they
may become abrupt and cool. They will become less animated and use fewer gestures
than is normal for them. This lack of obvious cues does not necessarily mean all is well.
Amiable people will try to end the uncomfortable situation in a quick fashion. However,
they are not likely to quickly forget the conflict, and instead, it can continue to influence
their actions and relationships until it is resolved. They may even try to “get even” in
small ways, such as critical remarks that are made off-hand. If the Amiable Style person
has close relationships with others at work, he or she also might share details of the
confrontation with people who are in their inner circle.
The Role of SOCIAL STYLE in Conflict
14 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Need: To Be Right Growth Action: To Declare
Orientation: Thinking Backup Behavior: Withdraws — Avoids the Situation
Analytical Style people are focused on information and a desire to make the right decision from their perspective. Thinking and careful analysis are considered critical by these individuals. Others see them as reserved, slow-moving and risk-averse.
Analytical Style people are cooperative in action, as long as they are not forced to act too quickly and have freedom to organize their own efforts. They appreciate others who support their approach and principles. Follow-through and meeting commitments are important when working with an Analytical Style person.
Analytical Style people use time to fully review a situation and conduct proper analysis. They do not like to be rushed, believing that doing so will result in mistakes. Their decision-making is thus slow-paced and methodical. Facts and verifiable information are most important. Gut instincts or attempted use of influence are seen as negative.
In times of tension, the Analytical Style person is likely to avoid making a decision or leave the situation altogether. The concept of “paralysis by analysis” applies to the Analytical person. He would rather delay action than make the wrong decision.
These delays and avoidances represent Analytical Backup Behavior.
What Does Conflict with an Analytical Style Person Look Like?
Analytical Style people will not always verbally express that there is a problem, but they will show signs of conflict in their own way. Their natural behavior is to withdraw, and this can show itself in specific ways, including the obvious one of simply walking away. Other signs of tension might include an unwillingness to move forward and a tendency to slow down their work, or avoid speaking to the person they’re in conflict with. While in the heat of a conflict they are likely to avoid eye contact and will not be very animated unless they are extremely upset. In fact, they might display less facial expressiveness and emotion than normal. Their body posture is typically going to be rigid. Analytical Style people like to remain emotionally controlled, so they may even talk more slowly and lower their voices more than normal when making their arguments. It is unusual for Analytical Style people to become outwardly confrontational. However, if they have reached a firm decision about something they will sometimes defend this position fiercely.
Managing Conflict
15© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
scenario: After nearly two hours of simmering and no response from Sarah, Jay
decided to find her. He marched through the office with a clear purpose in mind. Ron
saw the fast-moving Events Director and quickly ducked into a conference room to
avoid another unpleasant situation.
Jay didn’t bother knocking as he entered Sarah’s office. Sarah prided herself on her
professional behavior and shrugged off Jay’s brusque entrance and greeted him calmly.
Sarah was prepared to explain the facts of the situation and then review potential
solutions with Jay. She was about to start discussing this minor misunderstanding and
propose how they evaluate solutions together when Jay quickly jumped in and accused
her of sabotaging his convention. Startled by both his tone and his words, she quietly
listened to the rant. As time passed, Jay grew increasingly frustrated by Sarah’s lack of
response. Sarah tried to find an opening to explain the facts of the situation, but didn’t
feel she could get in a word edgewise. After a few minutes of non-progress, she calmly
explained that she needed to go into another meeting but promised to evaluate the
situation and get back to Jay first thing in the morning. Jay left — still frustrated — but
hopeful that he had forced Sarah to recognize her mistake.
Later that afternoon Sarah spent some time reviewing the filing schedule
and considering the options available to best meet everyone’s objectives.
She then scheduled a meeting for the morning with Jay and Deborah,
the Chief Operating Officer, and before leaving for the evening she drafted a detailed
recommendation.
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
16 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Five Key Steps
There are times when you may anticipate that a conflict might happen. By using SOCIAL
STYLE, you can sometimes head off conflict before it occurs. After receiving the e-mail
and voice mail from Jay, Sarah had some obvious warning signs that she might be heading
for an emotionally charged meeting with Jay. Had she thought through the situation in
advance and accounted for Jay’s Style preferences, the outcome of the meeting might have
been different.
The idea of planning for conflict may seem unusual or even impossible. But in fact,
planning for tense situations is crucial for diminishing or avoiding disputes. By identifying
the people you are likely to clash with, and the situations where conflict is most likely to
occur, you can plan ahead to effectively handle the disagreements.
You can plan your interactions and effectively deal with behavioral issues in advance.
There are five steps to effectively planning for interactions that might involve conflicts;
1. Identify situations that can lead to conflict
2. Evaluate the likelihood that a conflict might occur
3. Identify the SOCIAL STYLES of the people involved, including yourself
4. Understand the behavioral preferences of the involved people and how they act
toward others, use time and make decisions
5. Plan your conversation accordingly
Managing Conflict
17© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1 . Identifying Situations that Lead to Conflict
You can probably think of times when you just knew that you would run into a dispute with
someone. We all have those moments, and sometimes they are like an unconscious sixth
sense. We feel that trouble is coming but we can’t quite pinpoint when or how it will arrive.
One of the strengths of SOCIAL STYLE is the opportunity it provides to proactively apply
its concepts to actually prevent conflicts from occurring. Before going into an interaction
or discussion, you can think about the topic and participants and make conscious
decisions about how to make the situation productive.
Conflict can arise from a variety of situations, including differences in values, procedures
for achieving goals, and work roles. Some common sources of conflict include:
• Delivering bad news
• Competing priorities
• Stress from deadlines and limited resources
• Previous negative experiences or conflicts
• People or groups with different expectations or outlooks
• And, of course, Style differences
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
18 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
2 . Evaluate the Likelihood that Conflict Might Occur
In thinking about the chances of a conflict occurring, there are two primary factors
involved. First is the perceived importance of the outcome of the activity or the process
that is at hand. Second is the relationship(s) involved. Evaluating these two factors can
give you indications as to the likelihood of a conflict and can assist you in your planning.
If a Good Relationship Exists AND the Issue Is Not Critical
• People are willing to accept differences
• Problem-solving is relatively easy
• Differences can be discussed and understood
• The issue is unlikely to escalate into major conflict
If a Good Relationship Exists AND the Issue Is Critical
• People are more concerned with truth and fairness than with their own positions
• Differences can be discussed and understood
• Issues are considered worth discussion and people work toward an agreement
• People attempt to problem-solve toward a win-win resolution
• The relationship can be strengthened
• Disagreements can be settled in a positive manner
Managing Conflict
19© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
If a Poor Relationship Exists AND the Issue Is Not Critical
• Differences present problems
• Personal issues exacerbate underlying conflict
• Little things escalate into bigger conflicts
• Productivity is hampered by insignificant issues
If a Poor Relationship Exists AND the Issue Is Critical
• Differences present almost insurmountable problems
• Situations have the potential to polarize parties
• People are resistant to working toward agreement
• Situations become competitive and win-lose oriented
• Escalation of conflict is likely
• Relationships are likely to end
• Resolution is likely to be painful and set up future difficulties
Thinking about the importance of the outcome and the relationship is helpful both
in the advance planning for conflict and when a conflict occurs. Obviously, whenever
relationships are not good, the potential for unproductive conflict increases. It is
especially important to plan in advance for these potentially Style-related conflicts.
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
20 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
3 . Identifying SOCIAL STYLES — Yourself Included
Know Yourself
When you anticipate potential conflicts, you should think about the people that will be
involved. Start by considering your own Style and how others tend to see people with your
Style. This is an important part of “controlling yourself.” By knowing yourself through
their eyes, you can take steps to keep those Style behaviors in check that might get in the
way of effective communication.
You have a set of preferred behaviors that help you get what you want — results.
However, these preferences can have ramifications. You might come across as
indifferent and pushy, and in conversation or conflict, others might see you as
domineering and unwilling to listen. Even worse, they may feel “steam-rolled”
by you and will react with their Style’s Backup Behavior. Some people will view
you as speaking too quickly or forcefully, which makes them feel like they can’t
join in the discussion. If your focus is solely on results, without considering
issues that are important to other people, you may actually slow things down
and delay getting the results you want. Similarly, if you push for your solution
or decision too quickly without getting input from others, you might not get the
buy-in from others that you need to succeed.
You seek personal approval through a variety of behaviors, some of which can
come across as overwhelming for others. While you usually don’t hesitate to
show your enthusiasm and appreciation of others, during conflicts you can be
seen as very aggressive and even inappropriate at times. Though you may not
intend to offend, others can easily feel personally attacked by you. Some people
may see you as boisterous and will find it difficult to join in the discussion.
In extreme circumstances in which you are dominating a situation, some
people may simply “surrender” and not even attempt to state their opinions.
Paradoxically, in such situations your attempts to gain what you want may
backfire, leading to a lack of support for you or your position.
Managing Conflict
21© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
You have a strong preference for feeling personally secure in your relationships
with co-workers, and the behaviors you use to fulfill this need can sometimes
have detrimental consequences during conflict situations. While you are
normally comfortable displaying your feelings, in difficult situations you can be
seen as timid and unwilling to voice your opinions. Others, especially Driving
and Expressive people, may incorrectly interpret this as agreement, or at least
acceptance of the direction things are going. In such circumstances, others may
simply move forward without realizing that you are not on board. This can
have consequences later on, both for you and for others who are involved in the
situation. If you do not voice your opinions, decisions will take place without
your influence. Also, others may not understand that their relationship with you
is strained. If you have not expressed what you want to say, they may believe
that everything is fine and will no longer be personally involved in the tension
that you are still experiencing.
Your desire to be right, or accurate, can often be seen as efficient and helpful,
but in stressful situations your behavior can be seen quite differently.
Depending on the importance that you place on an issue, or the strength of
your conviction, you may come across as obstinate and inflexible. Others may
see you as needlessly clinging to a position on an issue, without taking into
account other viewpoints. Alternatively, in some situations, others will see you
as withdrawn. You may simply refuse to take part in an argument, which others
can see as unproductive and even arrogant. This form of behavior is likely
to have ongoing consequences, but not the kind you would hope for. Instead,
projects will move forward either without your input or in spite of it.
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
22 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Identify the Style of Others
One of the reasons that SOCIAL STYLE works so well is because it’s easy to understand
and apply the concepts. You don’t need any special insights to identify a person’s Style and
thus, their behavioral preferences. You simply need to observe their behaviors that will
indicate where they fall on both the Ask/Tell and Emote/Control scales.
Be sure to look for both verbal and non-verbal behaviors when making your assessment.
Here are some additional tips for effective Style identification:
• Don’t jump to conclusions. Multiple observations in a variety of circumstances will
give you the most accurate assessment.
• Remain objective. Your feelings toward a person are independent of their Style and
behaviors. Similarly, don’t make “like” or “dislike” judgments about their behaviors.
• Separate Style clues from assigned authority or roles. Just because a person is
a supervisor does not make him or her a Driving Style. Nor are all Engineering people
are Analytical. Rely on your observations, not stereotypes.
• Moderate stress clarifies Style. When people experience some tension they
typically fall into the patterns of behavior that are most familiar to them and are easier
to identify.
• Get out of the way. It’s easier to observe someone if you’re watching an interaction
rather than being a part of it.
Remember, SOCIAL STYLE represents an overall theme of someone’s behavior. It is how
they prefer to behave most of the time. But, it is not an absolute! Everyone is capable of
displaying behaviors representative of the other Styles. It’s just that they won’t use these
behaviors with the same frequency and fluency. Don’t let an isolated set of behaviors be
your only point of reference when determining someone’s SOCIAL STYLE.
Managing Conflict
23© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Assertiveness Scale
Verbal Behaviors
Slower Pace of Speech Faster
Less Quantity of Speech More
Quieter Volume of Speech Louder
Non-Verbal Behaviors
Relaxed Use of Hands Directive
Lean Back Body Posture Lean Forward
Less Direct Eye Contact More
Responsiveness Scale
Verbal Behaviors
More Controlling
Monotone Task Facts / Data
Emotion Subjects Form of In Voice of Speech Descriptives
Inflection People Opinions / Stories
More Emoting
Non-Verbal Behaviors
More Controlling
Less Rigid Controlled
Use of Body Facial Hands Posture Expression
More Casual Animated
More Emoting
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
24 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
4 . Understanding Behavioral Preferences
Once you have determined the SOCIAL STYLE of the people involved, you can use that to
understand their preferences and build more effective relationships. This information will
also be extremely useful in sensing early signs of tension in others and taking steps to
minimize it before a full-blown conflict emerges. It’s particularly helpful to consider their
preferences around actions toward others, use of time and decision-making.
By understanding the Style preferences of others, you can develop interaction strategies
that increase the effectiveness of your communication. By understanding others, you can
help them overcome difficulties and stretch their abilities beyond their current levels of
performance.
n Slower-paced, slower to actn Makes efforts to establish processn Shows less concern for relationshipsn Works in a historical time framen Takes action cautiouslyn Tends to avoid personal involvement
n Faster-pacedn Makes efforts to control outcomesn Less concerned for caution in
relationshipsn Works in the present time framen Tends to direct the actions of othersn Tends to avoid inaction
n Slower-pacedn Makes efforts to build relationshipsn Shows less concern for affecting
changen Works in the present time framen Shows supportive actionn Tends to avoid conflict
n Faster-pacedn Makes efforts to be involvedn Shows less concern for routinen Works in the future time framen Tends to act impulsivelyn Tends to avoid isolation
Managing Conflict
25© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
5 . Planning Your Interactions
With an understanding of who you’re dealing with and their behavioral preferences, you
are able to plan your interactions to minimize potential conflicts. Plan your conversation
so there is a higher chance of having a successful outcome. These steps will help you
build rapport with people of each Style.
• Plan for how you can be direct and use time efficiently
• Make sure you are prepared to focus on what needs to be accomplished
• Do your homework so you can provide facts, logic and alternatives
• Prepare how you will clearly state your opinions
• Look for opportunities to let the Driving Style person make decisions
• Look for opportunities to reach a quick decision
• Expressive Style people like stimulating situations, so prepare to use some
of your time to engage this person
• Determine how you will describe any personal benefits of various options
for the Expressive Style person
• Prepare to help this person make a decision, based on the benefits and
options you’ve outlined
• Prepare how you can help this person to develop an organized plan to
accomplish what needs to be done
• Plan to follow up with this person to ensure that progress is being made
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
26 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
• Direct confrontation is uncomfortable for Amiable Style people, so plan to
approach them in a friendly and personable manner
• Prepare to offer assurance to this person that an agreement will be made
and relationships will be secure
• Think about the viewpoints of other people the Amiable Style person works
with and how this may impact them, and plan to discuss those viewpoints
• Plan to help the Amiable Style person to open up and share freely by
asking open-ended questions
• Once agreement is achieved, make sure to confirm decisions in order to
ensure there is commitment
• Plan ahead to be accurate and prepared with specific information
• Prepare any relevant data and plan to present it
• Give them information in writing ahead of time so they will have a chance
to prepare
• Take time to understand and present the pros and cons of different ideas
• Remember that Analytical Style people don’t focus on feelings or opinions,
so plan to be straightforward and business-like
• Plan to move the discussion to a logical decision
We have provided a planning worksheet that you can use in advance of potential conflicts.
It helps identify potential problems and appropriate ways to get the situation back on
track.
Managing Conflict
27© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Smart Planning Worksheet
The following worksheet can help you assess potential conflicts and plan appropriate steps.
Section I: Who Is Involved
Yourself
Your Style: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Your Style Need: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What will cause your tension to increase?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL STYLE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Their Style Need: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What will cause this person’s tension to increase?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL STYLE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Their Style Need: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What will cause this person’s tension to increase?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section II: Likelihood of Conflict
Current Status of Relationship: Good Poor
Perceived Criticality of Issue: Not Critical Critical
Describe the potential for conflict: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Smart Planning: Minimizing Potential Conflicts
28 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Section III: Planning to Head Off Conflict
What can you do in advance to make each person more comfortable? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What signs of tension should you look for? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If conflict develops, what is your appropriate response? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Managing Conflict
29© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conflicts as They Occur
scenario: As the new COO, Deborah often was invited to meetings with other senior
managers. The information Sarah included as background with her meeting invitation
was straightforward. Since this would normally be a decision that Jay and Sarah should
simply be able to make on their own, Deborah wondered if there might be more to it
than it seemed.
Deborah and Jay had worked together for many years and were peers until her recent
promotion. While she didn’t always appreciate Jay’s emotional manner, she knew he was
a reliable manager who delivered results. Deborah didn’t know Sarah nearly as well, but
had been impressed by Sarah’s ability to take over a previously disorganized department
and quickly achieve success. She also appreciated Sarah’s business focus.
Deborah decided to go to the office early the next morning to prepare for what she
worried might be a contentious meeting.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conficts as They Occur
30 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Using SOCIAL STYLE to Diffuse Conflict
In the previous chapter we discussed how SOCIAL STYLE can help us head off many
conflicts through effective planning. But even the best preparation won’t avoid every
conflict. So now let’s look at how to handle tensions as they develop and conflicts as they
occur.
Whether a conflict is a direct result of relationship issues or interpersonal tensions have
developed from other sources of conflict, effective communication is critical to bringing
calm to a tense situation. Using what you know about SOCIAL STYLE, you can diffuse the
conflict situation and prevent small conflicts from growing into bigger ones.
In this section of the guide you will learn how to use the following steps to help
head off conflict before it occurs;
1. Pay attention to the communication needs of each Style
2. Recognize Backup Behavior and take steps to minimize it
3. Help others understand all sides of the situation
4. Move toward agreement
Managing Conflict
31© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The Steps to Minimize Conflict
Below is advice for managing conflict with people of each Style. By following these steps,
you should be able to minimize the impacts of conflict and move towards productive
outcomes.
1. Pay Attention to the Communication Needs of Each Style
By knowing the Style of the person in advance, you know what their communication
needs are. Pay attention to the flow of the conversation to make sure you are
meeting the needs of others. In this type of situation, one aspect of Versatility
— Feedback — is very important. The skilled use of Feedback allows you to adjust
the quality and amount of communication, as well as your non-verbal behaviors. On
the following pages we will provide tips for communicating with individuals of each
Style, particularly when starting a conversation or meeting.
2. Recognize Backup Behavior
When your co-workers experience tension, they will start to show their Backup
Behavior. If unchecked, this tension can lead to full-blown conflict. On the following
pages we will provide tips for identifying and alleviating tension for each Style.
3. Help Others Understand All Sides of the Situation
Sharing bad news or discussing a topic where parties have fundamental differences
can be challenging. But it doesn’t have to disintegrate into full-blown conflict. On the
following pages we will provide tips to help others understand your perspective or
share potentially negative information.
4. Verify that You Have Agreement
You’ve now focused your interaction in a way to minimize tension and redirected
the situation away from behavioral issues toward the business at hand. It is also
important to clarify that you have achieved agreement with the other person or
people. On the following pages we will provide tips to verify you have agreement
with people of each Style.
Applying the Steps to Each of the SOCIAL STYLES
Let’s now review how these steps apply to each of the SOCIAL STYLES. By doing this you
will understand how to use your knowledge of SOCIAL STYLE to help head off conflicts
before they escalate. By applying your Style knowledge when you sense conflict beginning
to occur, you will more effectively manage the tension in the heat of the moment and
create more productive outcomes.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conficts as They Occur
32 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1. Pay attention to their communication needs
Anticipate this Behavior
This Person Wants to Be:
To Strengthen This Relationship Support:
Use Time To:To Get Action
Provide:
ImpersonalSecretive
OrganizedDemanding
Factual
In Control Conclusion and Actions
Be Efficient Options with
probable outcomes
To establish rapport, make sure that conversations get right to the point
when interacting with a Driving Style person. This will support their
orientation for taking action and the Style need for getting results. So,
unless they bring up something personal, keep it “strictly business.”
Explain what you want to accomplish.
The facts and results orientation of Driving Style people make them most
comfortable with specific questions. Close-ended questions and probing
questions allow them to emphasize facts and information. Their answers
will tend to be concise and to the point. Be prepared to ask follow-up
questions, when necessary, to draw out additional needed details. They
may become uncomfortable with open-ended or hypothetical questions
they deem vague or unproductive. But be cautious not to come across to the
Driving Style as interrogating them.
2. Recognize Backup Behavior
Signs that Driving Style people are experiencing tension include increasing
impatience, more animation, verbalizing specific objections and attempting
to take even more control of the situation. They generally will not be open to
listening to others while in backup mode.
You can reduce their tension by identifying specific problems they are
concerned about. Pay attention to their need for results, but be willing to
stand up to them if necessary. This may be contrary to your own Style
preferences and uncomfortable for you, but Driving Style people usually
respect this form of self-assertion. Offer these individuals options regarding
how the team or the situation can best move forward.
Managing Conflict
33© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
3. Help them understand all sides of the situation
Because people with a Driving Style appreciate being provided with
alternatives, helping them to see other sides of the situation can be as
straightforward as organizing and laying these out for them. Before going
into details of the different sides of an issue, provide them with an overview,
and give them the implications of each course of action.
When giving bad news or difficult feedback, be direct and support your
criticism with enough facts to make your point. Driving Style individuals
would rather receive specific facts related to the tough message than hear
how it made you or others feel. Try to phrase the message in terms of the
results. Remember to stress the opportunity or challenge, and refrain
from focusing on any personal feelings and from overloading them with
information. Provide options. Involve the Driving Style person in setting
specific goals and next steps. Don’t be afraid to stand up to or challenge a
Driving Style person.
4. Move toward agreement
Be direct in asking for a decision or a commitment from the various options.
Spell out next steps and deliver what you promised in an efficient manner.
You will almost certainly know if you have this person’s agreement because
he or she will tell you! All the cards are usually on the table with this person.
Remember when you are asking for commitment from a Driving Style person
to be very direct and do not beat around the bush.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conficts as They Occur
34 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1. Pay attention to their communication needs
Anticipate this Behavior
This Person Wants to Be:
To Strengthen This Relationship Support:
Use Time To:To Get Action
Provide:
StimulatingUnstructuredEnthusiastic
OutgoingPersonal
Recognized Dreams and Intuitions
Be Stimulating
Recognition with
motivation
To establish rapport with an Expressive Style individual, find some
ways you can acknowledge your personal approval of this person. Show
your support for their aspirations, enthusiasm or energy for a project.
Expressive Style individuals will want to hear what the purpose of the
conversation is in general terms. Provide the Expressive co-worker with
attention and enthusiasm without letting them take total control. Let this
person vent as appropriate, but be cautious about allowing him or her to
get emotionally carried away. Provide some form of personal motivation to
move forward.
Expressive Style people are much more comfortable with open-ended
or hypothetical questions that allow them to express their vision and
creativity. They can find close-ended questions constraining and
uncomfortable. When it is necessary to ask a close-ended question, ask
about key facts rather than specific details that would need to be recounted
in a precise or logical order.
2. Recognize Backup Behavior
Tension in Expressive Style people can manifest itself as emotional
outbursts, dominating behaviors, critical statements and even outright
attacks. These people are often very animated, and while in backup mode,
they can be loud and physically active in their gestures and expressions.
To help alleviate tension with Expressive Style people, allow them to vent
their frustration, but be careful not to let them get carried away with their
emotions since this can result in an unproductive “loop.” Let them know
that you understand their concerns, and then move toward a solution
that separates the emotion from the objective facts. If their frustration is
directed toward an individual, help them separate the person from the work
Managing Conflict
35© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
situation, since Expressive Style people often criticize people on a personal
level. Showing appreciation for them and the value of their work will also
help them to come out of their Backup Behavior. Expressive Style people
often cool down as quickly as they heat up.
3. Help them understand all sides of the situation
You can help Expressive Style people consider other sides of an issue by
first recognizing them for their contribution to some aspect of the topic at
hand. This will fulfill their need for recognition and leave them more open
to hearing other viewpoints. When discussing other perspectives, indicate
how Expressive Style people can or should be involved in the activities at
hand, or any impacts for them personally.
If you must deliver a tough message to someone with an Expressive Style,
you should seek his or her input. Ask this person for ideas, and be future-
oriented. Understand their desire to see the big picture, and have fun.
Beware of providing too much data or ignoring their enthusiasm. Let this
person know that the negative feedback is about their performance and
not about them personally. Ask open-ended questions about their opinions
on some ways that they feel might be able to correct the situation. Avoid
blaming, but rather focus on the general issues that need to be discussed.
Don’t get focused on details, but emphasize the big picture. Explain how the
Expressive Style person will contribute to overall success.
4. Move toward agreement
Show enthusiasm about a decision as an important milestone. The
Expressive Style person will often tell you that a conflict is over and will
go back to the level of relationship he or she had with you prior to the
conflict. Clarify next steps and provide precise, written follow-up. Check in
periodically to assess progress. Deliver on your own commitments.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conficts as They Occur
36 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1. Pay attention to their communication needs
Anticipate this Behavior
This Person Wants to Be:
To Strengthen This Relationship Support:
Use Time To:To Get Action
Provide:
WarmAgreeable
CooperativeCarefulQuiet
Sure Feelings and Relationships
Be Agreeable Security with
assurances
To establish rapport with an Amiable Style person, it is usually appropriate
to open the discussion with a people-related topic in an area where you
have previously established common ground. For example, ask a question
about common interests or family. This will help assure the person that
his or her relationship with you is okay, and facilitates your moving into
the purpose of the interaction. As a word of caution, it is generally only
appropriate to talk about personal matters if you have already established
a solid relationship with the Amiable Style person. If you are unfamiliar
with the person, or worse, not genuine in your interaction, an Amiable Style
person will not respect your attempts to establish rapport.
Close-ended questions can make an Amiable Style uncomfortable. If you
observe the Amiable Style individual’s discomfort, be sure to ask them to
tell you what is on their mind. Open-ended questions allow this person to
answer in a way that allows them to provide the “answer” and the context
of their response. Amiable people are typically quite comfortable with
hypothetical questions.
2. Recognize Backup Behavior
Amiable Style people are likely to withdraw and become even less assertive
as their tension grows. They may acquiesce to the group or individual,
simply stating that everything is okay without verbalizing their viewpoint
or actively committing to the identified next steps. They may avoid eye
contact and will sometimes become fidgety as they become more tense.
To help reduce tension, actively discuss any implications that decisions
will have on the people who are involved. Be upfront about your own needs
or commitments, while reassuring the Amiable Style person about his
or her concerns. Explain that disagreements on business issues do not
necessarily indicate deteriorating personal relationships. Allow them to
Managing Conflict
37© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
express themselves by actively giving them the floor to air any grievances
and concerns. Make it safe for the Amiable Style person to disagree.
3. Help them understand all sides of the situation
Amiable Style people are more open to hearing other viewpoints when you
first acknowledge their feelings and opinions about the topic at hand. They
can accept other perspectives and decisions contrary to their own, as long as
you have shown that you empathize with them and their situation. By doing
this you will also open the door for them to consider other points of view
that they may not have taken into account before. It is also helpful to clearly
discuss any impacts that decisions will have on them or their relationships
with their co-workers.
When delivering difficult information, keep in mind that Amiable Style
individuals tend to focus on relationships and they really do aim to please.
If a decision has to be made that is initially disagreeable, clearly explain
the reasons why the decision is being made. Point out any opportunities that
might be inherent in the new situation for them to contribute. If providing
feedback about personal performance, give examples of how the person is
performing well prior to bringing up areas that need improvement. Be open
to discussing emotions, but keep the conversation on solutions and not on
other people, unless these people are an important component. Try to avoid
pressing hard for immediate change or coming across as impersonal. Let
Amiable Style people know that the feedback is about their performance in a
particular situation or area, and is not about your personal relationship with
them. Ask open-ended questions about how they feel they might be able to
improve the situation, and work cooperatively with them to identify specific
next steps.
4. Move toward agreement
Verify that the Amiable person is ready to proceed before forcing a decision.
Discuss the implications for others. Reinforce the long-term relationship as
well as near-term business issues. Check back periodically to make sure the
Amiable person is still comfortable. You’ll know the conflict with an Amiable
person is over when the relationship returns to its pre-conflict level. The
relationship will be good. Be cautious, though, because this individual may
not tell you that anything is amiss when in fact he or she is still actively
involved in the conflict. Remember that establishing a safe and trusting
environment is important for minimizing conflict.
Heat of the Moment: Handling Conficts as They Occur
38 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1. Pay attention to their communication needs
Anticipate this Behavior
This Person Wants to Be:
To Strengthen This Relationship Support:
Use Time To:To Get Action
Provide:
CoolDistantFormal
ConservativeLogical
Right Principles and Thinking
Be Accurate Evidence with
support
Open conversations with Analytical Style people by acknowledging or
commending them in some area where they were correct or in some area
where their logical and organized approach was helpful. This helps them
meet their Style Need to make sure things are done right. Establish the
purpose of the conversation in a logical, organized manner. Being vague
or too general or too relationship-focused will also be off-putting to the
Analytical Style. Take time in your conversations to share important facts
and demonstrate your preparation. Encourage a two-way dialogue that is
organized and logical. Listen carefully to the questions and statements of
your Analytical co-worker.
The Analytical Style person is typically comfortable being asked close-
ended questions that focus on facts and details and consider the past.
This person also needs to be given time to think, so don’t hurry an answer.
This person may be inclined to give you a lot of unnecessary detail, so
be prepared to help him or her focus on the question at hand. Organize
your questioning to make the Analytical person comfortable. Hypothetical
questions may be discomforting, because the person typically might not
have thought about the situation or have sufficient data to answer in a way
they feel appropriate.
2. Recognize Backup Behavior
The Analytical Style person may become even more quiet and withdrawn in
a time of tension. They tend to avoid eye contact and may try to focus their
attention on something unrelated to the source of the tension, even trying
to physically leave the situation. They may object to certain decisions or
postpone action because they are upset with the course of events.
You can help to diffuse tension with Analytical Style people by logically
discussing the issues at hand and objectively evaluating the situation.
Managing Conflict
39© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Validate their contributions and concerns by stating your understanding,
followed by your own reasoning. Allow them to express their opinions and
concerns about the source of conflict, being aware that this might require
some time away from the situation for them to process. Oftentimes when
Analytical Style people feel that their viewpoints have been heard, they
will be able to move into a more productive mode and the conflict will be
diminished.
3. Help them understand all sides of the situation
Analytical Style people will be open to other points of view when these are
presented in a straightforward and logical manner. Begin by recognizing
the thinking and effort that went into the stance of Analytical Style people.
This will open the door by easing any concern they may have about not
being heard or understood. Then simply present the other perspectives and
the reasoning behind each of them. In this scenario, Analytical Style people
will often be open to hearing other perspectives that they may not have
considered.
When delivering a tough message to an Analytical Style person, make
sure you use a logical, methodical approach. Explain why your concerns
are logical and appropriate. Support your observations with facts and
evidence. Ask close-ended questions to make sure they understand your
feedback, and open-ended questions to seek their input on how the situation
can be improved. Analytical Style individuals sometimes prefer to receive
detailed information in writing. Avoid pressing them for an immediate
response or action plan. Instead, let them work out the details on their own.
4. Move toward agreement
Verify that all necessary facts have been considered by asking probing
questions. Review the process and the conclusions. Allow the Analytical
person to voice any concerns and then encourage a decision. You should
explicitly ask the Analytical person if he or she agrees. Depending on the
complexity of the circumstances, this person might like to see the terms
of the agreement written in an e-mail. Once you have agreement with an
Analytical Style person, you can generally count on him or her to honor that
agreement.
Managing Conflict
40© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Managing Conflict
41© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Post-Mortem: Repairing the Effects of Conflict
scenario: Deborah had just pushed the elevator button for her floor when an arm was
thrust through the closing doors. “I’m glad I caught you,” Jay said as he entered the
elevator. “We have a major problem.” Jay told his story to Deborah on their elevator
ride, while they each grabbed a coffee and talked for the next 15 minutes in Jay’s office.
Deborah listened patiently even though Jay was repeating himself and seemed more
interested in describing the conflict than in achieving a solution.
Eventually Jay paused and Deborah took the opening. She assured Jay that she
understood his concern and that everyone wanted the convention to be a success.
“We’re all in this together,” she told him. “Give me 30 minutes and we’ll sit down with
Sarah and work this out.”
Deborah left Jay and sought out Sarah to discuss the situation.
Post-Mortem: Repairing the Effects of Conflict
42 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Repairing the Relationship
Preparing for potential conflicts and applying the appropriate SOCIAL STYLE techniques
in conflicts will significantly reduce the number and significance of conflicts in your
work. Still, given the reality of today’s workplace, it’s likely that some conflicts will arise,
resulting in productivity and relationship problems.
Let’s now look at ways to repair conflicts and their impact. Much like conflict planning,
conflict remediation requires an understanding of the other party’s Style preferences.
Think about the conflict and consider the following questions:
• What was the source of the conflict?
• Was it primarily driven by behavioral and Style issues or was there another
fundamental cause?
• Did Style issues amplify the problem?
• Did the other party act in ways consistent with your assessment of his or her Style?
• If not, might your initial Style assessment need revision?
• Was the tension felt primarily by you or the other person?
• Did you take steps to lessen the tension?
• If so, why did those steps not work?
• Was there a conflict resolution technique that might have worked better?
This debrief should shed light on what led to conflict. It provides an objective review of
the conflict and a starting point for addressing it. To remedy the situation, you should
initiate an interaction that specifically meets the other person’s preferences in regard to
actions toward others, use of time and decision-making. By meeting the other person’s
preferences, he or she may be more willing and likely to respond positively to you,
thereby satisfying your own requirements.
Managing Conflict
43© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
For Driving Style people when a conflict is over, it’s over. They tend to live in the
present and don’t dwell too much on the past. In fact, focusing too much on a
conflict that has run its course can be more harmful to the relationship than just
letting it go. It is best to move on and focus on taking your planning steps for
any future conflicts.
Though Driving Style people tend to quickly leave conflict behind them, there
is an exception to this rule. If they believe that you made a critical mistake, or
have judged you to have a lower level of competence than they feel is required,
they are likely to have an ongoing state of tension with you because they don’t
believe you can meet their performance requirements. They may even feel
compelled to point out the mistake in a group setting. Other Styles can also feel
this way, particularly Analytical Style people. However, Driving Style people
are most likely to actively confront you if they judge you to lack competence. Of
course, this assumes that the Driving Style person feels strongly that he or she
is correct and that your abilities are the source of the conflict.
In order to successfully move beyond a conflict with a Driving Style person, try
following the guidelines below for approaches they prefer and do not respond
well to.
þ Accepts - Be specific and to the point. Demonstrate past results and competence.
Commend their drive and ability to get things done. Stress deadlines and
competitiveness.
ý Rejects - Do not be abstract or vague, and avoid dwelling on the long-term. Don’t
be non-committal about expectations of results. Do not expect detail and
thorough written reporting. Avoid assigning them to long-term projects.
Post-Mortem: Repairing the Effects of Conflict
44 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
With an Expressive Style person, it is important to mutually acknowledge that
the conflict occurred and then agree to move on. You may need to approach
the person in order to settle the conflict, since Expressive Style people are
sometimes unyielding, especially if they believe strongly that they are “right.”
However, if they are able to see your side of an issue, or even believe that they
have made mistakes, they will usually approach you and let you know this.
By letting the person know that you are still enthusiastic about working with
him or her, in spite of the recent conflict, you will help to minimize any lasting
impacts from the conflict.
Expressive Style people are generally comfortable with quickly leaving conflict
behind and moving forward, so you should make an effort to do this also. This
might be somewhat contrary to your own Style, and can be a challenge for some
people because they will still feel lingering effects of the conflict, even though
Expressive Style people might not be aware of this. Though Expressive Style
people usually quickly recover from conflict, there are exceptions. If they believe
strongly that their position is the correct one, they will sometimes resurface
the issue solely to make that point. Also, if following a conflict you do not
acknowledge them in a personal way as you did prior to the conflict, they may
still feel tension in the relationship.
In order to successfully move beyond a conflict with an Expressive Style person,
try following the guidelines below for approaches they prefer and do not
respond well to.
þ Accepts - Praise their ideas and vision, and seek their input. Emphasize the big picture
and be future-oriented. Give lots of strokes and follow-up with them.
ý Rejects - Do not be impersonal or ignore their enthusiasm. Don’t be impatient with
their creativity or overload them with detail. Avoid putting tasks ahead of fun.
Try not to demand accuracy above appearance.
Managing Conflict
45© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Repairing damage with Amiable Style people can be difficult because conflicts
hit directly at the importance they place on personal relationships. It is
important for both parties to acknowledge the conflict, and even to review what
happened and the reasons for one another’s actions. Amiable Style people will
appreciate taking the time to do this, and also discussing ways to avoid similar
conflicts in the future. Remember that Amiable Style people like to please, so
they will be searching for ways to make the situation better.
Since Amiable Style people value good relationships, they will generally be
eager to move from the conflict to an established relationship. However, they will
still feel tension in their relationship with you if, following a conflict, they do not
feel valued. If the Amiable Style person feels like he or she is trying to do a good
job and work successfully with others, but feels discounted or devalued, then he
or she will not want to move forward without understanding the issue and what
can be done to improve the situation.
In order to successfully move beyond a conflict with an Amiable Style person,
try following the guidelines below for approaches they prefer and do not
respond well to.
þ Accepts - Display your concern and stress that you need their help. Praise their
enthusiasm and awareness. Emphasize a team approach. Be flexible.
ý Rejects - Do not be distant or press hard for change. Don’t be dictatorial. Avoid pushing
hard for details, written analysis, or homework. Don’t assume that deadlines
will be met without follow-up.
Post-Mortem: Repairing the Effects of Conflict
46 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
It is not always easy to determine if Analytical Style people have moved past a
conflict. Their natural tendency is to withdraw, so by attempting to re-engage
with them in work activities you should be able to determine if they are still
feeling tension. To help an Analytical Style person leave a conflict behind, it is
helpful to give them some reassurance about the value of their work. This person
might also appreciate if you show that you understand what happened during
the conflict and the reasons for his or her actions. Primarily, an Analytical Style
person wants to feel that you still value their competence and input, and that you
will still support their decisions.
Analytical Style people will still be engaged in the conflict under certain
situations. Similar to the Driving Style, if they attribute fault in the conflict to
you, they may judge you to be inadequate for the needs of the situation and will
question your abilities going forward. If this is the case, an Analytical Style
person will often try to find ways to work around you rather than with you. They
might do this by finding other people to take on certain responsibilities, or will
simply attempt to take on a larger workload themselves. Since Analytical Style
people are reticent to have direct confrontations, they may not tell you that there
is an issue and may just try to ignore you.
To successfully move beyond a conflict with an Analytical Style person, follow
the guidelines below for approaches they prefer and do not respond well to.
þ Accepts - Be organized and logical. Use a moderate approach and consider their past
record. Put things in writing, and allow them time to think and for planning.
ý Rejects - Do not be hasty or insist on immediate action or decisions. Don’t over-
personalize or be too emotional. Avoid being impatient or taking shortcuts.
Moving Forward
If Style differences played a role in the conflict, then taking these steps will go a long
way toward repairing the situation. It might even result in a stronger relationship in the
future. If the conflict was the result of non-Style issues, these steps will help you take
behavioral Style issues “off the table” and focus on the real causes of the conflict.
Resolving a conflict is not just a matter of apologizing or giving in. It’s a recognition of
the conflict issues and consciously taking the steps to eliminate or reduce those issues.
This is in your own best interest as well as the other party’s.
Managing Conflict
47© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
In Closing
scenario: Deborah looked at the clock and half-smiled. Reaching a consensus had
taken less time than she had anticipated. And while Jay and Sarah certainly weren’t
going to be “best friends” anytime soon, everyone had left the room in agreement about
how to deal with the two competing responsibilities.
Much of the credit was due to Sarah’s legwork. She had developed an analysis of the
situation and a solution for the problem. Her plan was to use an outside contractor for
some of the auditing work. Deborah felt Sarah’s recommendation made sense, even if
it was more detailed and lengthy than was necessary.
In the meeting with Jay, Deborah explained the plan and how it would meet Jay’s
needs. She showed how using the contractor would free up Ron from auditing to staff
the convention. It wasn’t as much help as Jay had hoped, but it was enough to make
the staffing manageable. And Jay had readily agreed to fund the contractor out of his
budget in exchange for Ron’s availability.
Closing
48 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Next Steps
As this guide has demonstrated, there are common types of conflicts. Even more
importantly, there are proven techniques for resolving the various conflicts. You are now
equipped to take intervening steps to deal with conflicts based on your knowledge of the
situation and the participants.
You understand that the natural differences and preferences of the SOCIAL STYLE
positions can lead to conflict if not managed effectively. You now have techniques to
anticipate these issues and take steps to lessen tension and deal with Backup Behavior
when it occurs.
Of course you won’t be able to prevent every conflict from developing, but you will be able
to evaluate the importance of the relationship and the importance of the desired outcome
and select the most appropriate conflict management method.
Like any new skill, you will need to consciously use what you’ve learned. With practice,
you will be skilled in effectively managing conflict.
Managing Conflict
49© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Appendix: Style-Specific Conflicts
Just as every Style behaves uniquely, conflicts between the various SOCIAL STYLES will
arise and develop differently based on who is involved. The following summarizes those
issues.
Conflicts between Expressive and Driving Styles
The preference of both of these Styles to communicate directly creates a potential for
conflict. Where both Styles might want to brainstorm new ideas, the Driving Style sees
this as a means to achieving an outcome and will want to move on relatively quickly. The
Expressive enjoys the creative process in its own right and is less focused on progress.
He also may take offense if other participants criticize his ideas or fail to recognize his
contributions.
And as both Styles are tell-assertive, there is a potential for disagreements with neither
willing to give in. You can easily imagine disputes over the best use of time turning into
major battles.
In order for people of these two Styles to settle disagreements, it is important that they
both practice their Growth Actions. By patiently listening, the Driving Style person allows
his co-worker to convey what he wants. Likewise, if the Expressive Style person checks
his behavior, it is much more likely that his Driving Style colleague will pay attention to
him and accept what he is saying.
Conflicts between Analytical and Amiable Styles
The tensions that can arise between these Styles may be less obvious, but still have
potential for negative outcomes. The Analytical’s emphasis on information and process
may be at odds with the Amiable’s emphasis on people and relationships. Both are ask-
assertive, so neither is inclined to be decisive or forceful in advancing a project.
The Backup Behaviors of the two Styles can also interact negatively when tension occurs.
The Analytical is likely to retreat or delay decisions, while the Amiable may give in to
keep things from flaring up. So while conflicts between these Styles are unlikely to erupt
into major battles, they can undermine the advancement of progress.
If both people take their Growth Action, To Initiate and To Declare, the outcome can
be positive. A collaboration of the Analytical’s data approach and the Amiable’s people
orientation can frequently yield good results.
Appendix: STYLE-Specific Conflicts
50 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Conflicts between Amiable and Driving Styles
Whereas the Amiable and Analytical Styles differ on only one scale of the SOCIAL STYLE
model, Amiables and Driving differ in both their ask/tell and control/emote preferences.
This can lead to significant tension and potential conflict. Think of a time at work when
someone complained about having to “waste time on touchy-feely stuff when there was
real work to do” or when somebody felt that decisions were made without considering
how they might affect morale or people’s feelings.
People of these two Styles come at things from completely opposite perspectives. The
Driving person may be seen as brusque and too formal. The Amiable will be perceived
as not focused on the business at hand. These at-odds preferences can raise tension and
quickly result in Backup Behavior that makes the situation worse. As the Driving Style’s
tension rises, he or she is likely to dominate the interaction. The Amiable is likely to give
in to the more dominating Driving Style.
If these two Styles take their Growth Actions and collaborate, the result can be
productive. The Driving Style will push for results and the Amiable will make sure
consideration is given to the people and relationship issues.
Conflicts between Expressive and Analytical Styles
The tendency of Expressive Style people to prefer spontaneity and to dominate
conversation is frustrating for the Analytical person. They may feel that important
information, and their input, are being ignored. Neither is especially eager to move
projects quickly, but where the Analytical prefers research and thinking, the Expressive
seeks the big idea and credit for envisioning it. The Expressive’s lack of focus and
discipline are disconcerting to the Analytical. There is a potential for the Expressive to
dominate the Analytical, who may withdraw from the situation out of sheer frustration.
By taking his Growth Action and checking behavior, the Expressive can help increase the
comfort of the Analytical. In turn, the Analytical can be more decisive, showing how data
and information might validate a particular course of action.
Managing Conflict
51© THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Conflicts between Expressive and Amiable Styles
Both of these Styles tend to show their emotions to others. In that regard, there can
be a supporting relationship between the two. The Expressive is seeking validation
from others and the Amiable is typically ready to compliment and commend. But if an
Expressive fails to check his or her outspoken behavior, they can offend the relationship-
and safety- focused Amiable. An off-hand comment made in jest by the Expressive could
be quite hurtful and result in long-term hard feelings for the Amiable person.
As when working with the Driving Style, an Amiable must take care to avoid being
dominated by the more aggressive Expressive person. They can do this by taking their
Growth Action and declaring his or her opinions in a straightforward manner. If the
Expressive Style person also checks his behavior, this combination will usually result in a
productive outcome.
Conflicts between Analytical and Driving Styles
As both of these Styles tend to control their feelings, they tend to work professionally
together focusing on the matter at hand. It is in regard to taking action that often results
in conflict with these two. The Driving person’s tendency toward action is at odds with
the Analytical’s preference to move carefully to ensure things are done correctly.
To reduce tension, they should both take their Growth Actions. The Driving Style person
should slow down and ask specific questions to fully understand the Analytical person’s
concerns and perspective. The Analytical person should voice his commitment to
achieving results, and how he or she will support accomplishing objectives.
Appendix: STYLE-Specific Conflicts
52 © THE TRACOM CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Don't Stop Here… There's More to Discover
A wide variety of additional SOCIAL STYLE® resources are available to further
improve your performance . SOCIAL STYLE is the best-known Interpersonal
Effectiveness Model in the world and TRACOM offers tools to help any
organization, team or person .
Guides in the Working with Style series teach how individuals can apply SOCIAL
STYLE to specific workplace issues . These include:
Managing Conflict with Style – Studies have shown that managers spend up to 42% of their work time dealing with conflict and non-productive behavior in the workplace . Managing Conflict with Style provides specific advice on how to use Style to anticipate conflicts, reduce their occurrence, minimize their impact and repair damage after a conflict occurs .
Coaching with Style – Many organizations have adopted “coaching” as an important part of their development efforts . Coaching with Style shows how to apply SOCIAL STYLE techniques to any coaching process . It provides specific advice to help the coach build better relationships, improve communications, reduce tension and improve workplace productivity . It’s a must-read for anyone starting a coaching relationship .
Working in Teams with Style – The use of “teams” has gained widespread use in most organizations . A study of Fortune 1000 organizations showed that 90% used teams to conduct business . This has resulted in an increased interdependence on others to achieve results . Working in Teams with Style is the first book to teach how SOCIAL STYLE skills can improve team performance . It provides specific advice to help teams quickly and effectively take form, undertake their responsibilities and ultimately operate at optimal performance . The lessons of this book can be applied to any team structure or purpose .
These and additional books in the Working with Style series are available at www .tracomcorp .com . See the back cover of this book for additional tools to teach SOCIAL STYLE techniques for Managers and Sales Professionals .