Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation...

17
Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity , Knowledge and Innovation Euromed Marseille – Ecole de Management

Transcript of Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation...

Page 1: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Management in complexity

Physics and Biology

Walter Baets, PhD, HDRAssociate Dean for Innovation and Social ResponsibilityProfessor Complexity , Knowledge and InnovationEuromed Marseille – Ecole de Management

Page 2: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Physics

Page 3: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Ilya Prigogine

• Non-linear dynamic models (initial state, period doubling,….)

• Irreversibility of time principle

• The constructive role of time

• Behavior far away from equilibrium (entropy)

• A complex system = chaos + order

• Knowledge is built from the bottom up

Page 4: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Entropy

Measure for the amount of disorder

When entropy is 0, no further information is necessary(interpretation is that no information is missing

There is a maximum entropy in each system (in the bifurcationdiagram, this is 4)

Connection between statistical mechanics and chaos is applying entropy to a chaotic system in order to compare with anassociated statistical system

Page 5: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Biological complexity

Page 6: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Francesco Varela

• Self-creation and self-organization of systems and structures (autopoièse)

• Organization as a neural network• The embodied mind• Enacted cognition• Subject-object division is clearly artificial• How do artificial networks operate (Holland)• Morphic fields and morphic resonance (Sheldrake)

Page 7: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Self-producing systems, autopoiesisradical constructivism, self-reference

Maturana, Varela, Gödel, Mingers

Biological principle of self-producing systems= Autopoeisis

Has been interpreted a lot by different fields, differently

In opposition to the focus on species and genes, Maturana and Varela pick out the single, biological

individual (e.g. an amoebae) as the central example of a living system.

Individual autonomy, self-defined entities within an organism.

Page 8: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Living systems operate in an essentially mechanistic way.

The overall behavior of the whole is generated

purely by the components and its interactions.

Observers are external to the system. Observers perceive both an entity and its

environment. Components within an entity act purely in

response to other components.

Any explanation of living systems should be nonteleological, having no recourse to idea of purpose, goal, ends and functions.

Living systems are autopoietic (self-producing) circular, self-referring organization

Page 9: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Implications of autopoiesis

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.Organizational closure (immune system, nervous system, social system).Structural determinism.Dynamic systems interact with the environment through their structure.Inputs (perturbations) and outputs (compensations).Structural coupling = adaptation where the environment does not specify the adaptive changes that will occur.Self-production was not only specified for

biological systems (computergenerated models; human organizations, law)Law as an autopoietic system (Teubner)

Page 10: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Philosophical implications of autopoiesis

Epistemological and ontological presuppositions.

It constitutes a theory about the observer.

It implies there is no claim to objectivity.

Beliefs and theories are purely human constructs which

‘constitute’ rather than reflect realityconstructivism.

‘Biology of cognition’ (1970): observer is the system in which description takes place.

Page 11: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Ontology of autopoiesis

Perceptions and experiences occur through and are mediated by our bodies and nervous systems.

Therefor it is impossible for us to generate a description that is a pure description of reality, independent of ourselves.

Experience always reflects the observer.

There is no object of our knowledge, it is distinguished

by the observer.

Page 12: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Rupert Sheldrake (morphogenetic fields)

They are self-organised “collections” or “collectivities”;

They have a time and space aspect and they organise from time/space schemas of vibrations (energy) (and therefore from interaction);

They attract the systems under their influence towards characteristic forms or models. They organise the realisation of these activities and preserve the integrity of these activities. The goals or the places where these activities are attracted are called he attractors;

Page 13: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Rupert Sheldrake (morphogenetic fields) 2

The morphic fields are put in relationship with holons (units which are themselves entire). The morphic fields therefore include other morphic fields in a climbing hierarchy (nested hierarchy) or holarchy. These holarchies are created in an emergent fashion;

They are structures of probability and also their organising activity is probabilistic;

They include a so-called closed memory, formed by self-resonance with its own past and morphic resonance with comparable anterior systems. This memory is cumulative. As more models repeat themselves they become more normal.

Page 14: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Paradigm of mind :What are the stakes

Based on cognitive artificial intelligence.

The mind and the soul question.

Behaviorism: mind as behaviorexperimentalism (one can observe);behavior is what counts.

Mind as the brain: the mind-brain identity.

Mind as a computer: machine functionalism (Turing machine idea).

Page 15: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Mind as a causal structure: causal-theoretical functionalism

There exist a complex causal network in which mental

events are nodes.Input-output relations play an important

role.

Mental causation :physical to mental: burning one’s fingers;mental to physical: typewriting;mental to mental: our thinking.

Mental content: interpretation.

Page 16: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Emerging new paradigm of mind(Franklin)

Overriding task of mind is to produce the next action.Minds are the control structures of autonomous agents.Structure is determined by evolution or design (structural coupling; Varela).Mind is better viewed as continuous as opposed to Boolean fuziness.Mind operates on ‘sensation’ to create information.Varela: it is structured coupling which creates information, not sensory input.Sensing, acting and cognition go together

(enacted cognition).

Page 17: Management in complexity Physics and Biology Walter Baets, PhD, HDR Associate Dean for Innovation and Social Responsibility Professor Complexity, Knowledge.

Mind re-creates prior information (memories) to helpproduce actions.

Mind tends to be embodied as collections of relatively independent modules, with little communication between them (connectionism).

Mind is enabled by a multitude of disparate mechanisms.

Mind, as the action selection mechanism of autonomous agents, to some degree, is implementable on machines.

What is Intelligence (Khalfa)