Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015...
-
Upload
ethan-neal -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015...
![Page 1: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Making the Case for Program Evaluation
Chapter 1
CSUMB Public Administration 432
Spring, 2015
![Page 2: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Key Principles
Vital for program: Effectiveness Quality Efficiency Reach Equity Ethical practice
![Page 3: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Key Principles
Tension between: Needs and resources Helping few, helping many Self examination & business as usual Innovation and entrenched bureaucracy Program goals & environmental conditions Courage and fear
Poor past experiences
![Page 4: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Caution:
Best Practices aren’t always best: Culture Socio-economic status Resource differential Delivery differential Skill level / training External events Recent events
![Page 5: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Evaluation Perspectives
Client / Consumer / Patient Family members Focus population Funders & other stakeholders Agency / Organization Community of Practice
![Page 6: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Essential Ingredients
Commitment to ethics Commitment to quality & continuous
improvement Time, funds, attitude
Quest for knowledge Ability for logic Ability to focus – separate wheat from chaff
![Page 7: Making the Case for Program Evaluation Chapter 1 CSUMB Public Administration 432 Spring, 2015 pzerounian@csumb.edu.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081908/5697c0111a28abf838ccbc2e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Valuable Tool for Improvement
Purpose: assess content and delivery for effectiveness, efficiency, quality, reach, and/or equity
Critical to program success, and should not be treated as an after-thought
Need to engage stakeholders to influence agency decision-making Program staff & managers, focus population, funders