Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better
-
Upload
stephen-donnelly -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
425 -
download
4
Transcript of Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better
![Page 1: Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080213/55a66beb1a28abe17e8b47bc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Examinership produces the best commercial and social outcomes of insolvency, but is prohibitively expensive for many potentially viable Irish companies
Directors realise company is insolvent
Liquidation
• Directors appoint liquidator OR Creditor petitions High Court
• All jobs lost• All assets sold• Goodwill disappears• Going concern value of business lost• Limited (if any) realisations to benefit of
creditors after liquidator costs paid• No dividend to unsecured creditors• No effective control of costs
Receivership
• Directors appoint receiver
• Creditors may appoint receivers to charged assets
• Can be done as part of a liquidation
• Secured creditor recovers to the value of the assets subject to receiver costs
• Typically jobs lost• Typically no dividend to trade creditors• Goodwill value often fatally
compromised• Trade deteriorates • No effective control of costs
Examinership
• Independent Accountant’s Report done with opinion on whether company will survive
• High court petition grounded on report
• If court agrees, examiner then appointed
• New investment• Dividend to creditors• Employment protected• Balance sheet repaired • No impact on goodwill• Scope for promoters to retain control• Issues compromising trade resolved• “Bounce” given to trade• Control of costs
Mechanism Result
• €0• €5,000 if
creditor appointment
• €0
• €20,000 to €350,000
Cost
![Page 2: Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080213/55a66beb1a28abe17e8b47bc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Restructured Company Continues
Trading
Creditors Paid
High Court Reviews Proposal
Examiner Begins 70 Day Process
Directors & Creditors
Attend High Court
Examinership Advertised
Papers Filed With Central
Office of High Court
ExaminerHired
Independent Accountant’s Report Done
Directors Realise Company is
Insolvent
The complexity and legalistic nature of the current examinership process drive the high cost and opens the process to exploitation by well-resourced creditors
Accountant gives opinion of whether company can be successfully restructured
Judge decides whether or not to award protection to company
• Independent Accountant’s Report verified• Outline survival plan developed• New investor found & money deposited • Creditors met and vote on proposal• Creditors can and do involve the High Court in various
aspects of the process, adding to high legal costs
IF Judge decides to award protection
Company prepares High Court petition to be awarded examinership protection. Cost minimum €20k
![Page 3: Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080213/55a66beb1a28abe17e8b47bc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The proposed changes to the examinership process are based on identifying specific existing failures and providing workable solutions to each
1. High Court proceedings incur high legal costs
• Move proceedings to the Circuit Court, as required• See accompanying memo for details
2. Automatic Court involvement drives up costs unnecessarily
• Where two independent financial experts’ (the independent accountant and the examiner) analysis indicate the company has a prospect of survival, it can enter a rescue process
• Remove Court involvement, save where creditors or contributories require court oversight, for example, where creditor appeals to Circuit Court on grounds of unfair prejudice
3. Secured creditor(s) force closure of viable business
• Examiner may impose lending conditions on secured lenders over 5 years based on minimum altered lending amount, to the value of underlying security plus 7% (creditor cannot impose ‘on demand’ repayment terms)
4. Landlord forces closure of viable business through upward-only rent clause
• Give examiner ability to impose changes to leases over 5 years, based on minimum term of market plus 7%
Proposed Change / SolutionExisting Process Failure
5. Creditor(s) seeks to drive up process costs through vexatious court appeals
• If a creditor engages in court proceedings for vexatious or frivolous reasons they are on risk of an order for the costs incurred by the examiner and/or the company in defending the application
6. Essential creditors refuse to trade without guarantees
• Examiner may give priority to certain essential creditors if creditors are refusing to supply without such priority
![Page 4: Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080213/55a66beb1a28abe17e8b47bc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Restructured Company Continues
Trading
Examiner Begins 70 Day Process
ExaminerIssues
Protective Certificate
Independent Accountant’s Report Done
Directors Realise Company is
Insolvent
The proposed changes lead to a quicker, far less expensive process, whilst retaining court oversight and all advantages of the existing process
Accountant gives opinion of whether company can be successfully restructured, and examiner agrees with this opinion
Creditors may appeal to decision to the Circuit Court
• No Court involvement necessary, but available if agreement not possible
• Risk of costs orders if vexatious or frivolous court applications
• Examiner can take certain steps in new process that otherwise requires court approval
• Large reduction in costs (approx. 80% reduction) opens examinership process to many viable companies who cannot currently afford it
• Lower complexity makes process more attractive for all involved
• Viable businesses cannot be closed down due to a dominant creditor demanding payment (still gets paid, put over 5 years, with 7% annual return)
• Well-resourced creditors cannot close down process by clocking up legal costs for business in question
• Upward-only rent clauses cannot be used to shut down viable businesses
Advantages of Changes
![Page 5: Making Examinership quicker, cheaper and better](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080213/55a66beb1a28abe17e8b47bc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The proposed changes would significantly reduce the required new funding required for viable business to continue trading post examinership
WORKED EXAMPLE
Creditors Amount Owed, € Value of Security Reclassification1 Dividend2 New Funding
1. Secured 400,000 250,000 250,000 100% 250,000
2. Preferential 150,000 - 150,000 20% 30,000
3. Unsecured 200,000 - 350,000 10% 35,000
Total 750,000 250,000 750,000 To Creditors 315,000
Examinership3 100,000
415,000
1. Current Legislation – Viable business requires €415k of immediate new funding to survive
Creditors Amount Owed, € Value of Security Reclassification Dividend New Funding
1. Secured 400,000 250,000 250,000 107% -4
2. Preferential 150,000 - 150,000 20% 30,000
3. Unsecured 200,000 - 350,000 10% 35,000
Total 750,000 250,000 750,000 To Creditors 65,000
Examinership 20,000
85,000
2. Under New Legislation– Viable business requires €85k of immediate new funding to survive
1. Assumes original value of asset has fallen from €400k to €250k, so remaining €150k now categorised as unsecured.2. Taking typical values from an examinership process in Ireland.3. Could be as high as €350k.4. Amount of 107% has to be repaid in five years, but not straight away, as is the case at present.