Making East Commons More Sustainable

1
Making East Commons More Sustainable The Problem : the energy efficiency of East Commons is low because of excessive and unnecessary use of lighting and lack of sustainable use of energy. What is Sustainability? The act of being environmentally responsible by making sure our non-renewable natural resources last longer and meet the needs of future generations as well. http://www.pxd.com/images/values-content/ sustainable2.png?sfvrsn=0 http://www.hfs.psu.edu/_cs_apps/pt_photo_gallery/uploads/UP%20Housing/ original/Quad-in-East.png Team Lightning Bolts Penn State University By: Aesha Kewalramani, Dan Deegan, and Sarah Wood Summary Statement : The East Halls Commons currently uses almost 300,000 kWh of electricity per year on lighting alone. Our plan involves two simple changes that will lower energy consumption by 80%. To accomplish this goal, Penn State should replace the current light bulbs with LED lights and install dimmer switches. These two changes would cost $13,700 with a payback period of 0.42 years, saving Penn State $33,600 per year. The second change involves installing Solar Drapes in the dining hall, reducing 12,300 kWh of heat per year, with a savings of $1,600 per year. Solar Drapes have an upfront cost of $6, 700 and a payback period of 5.3 years. Original Design Ideas : Motion Sensors Light Dimmers More energy efficient light bulbs Turning off the computers Installing more efficient windows and doors Installing solar panels Light Dimmers LED Lights Solar Heating Drapes Conclusion: http://cfnewsads.thomasnet.com/images/large/ 469/469458.jpg Makes Penn State a more marketable campus.\ The University becomes a role model. East becomes a more attractive place to live in. Will save Penn State over $35,000/year and 266,841 kWh a year Easily installe d Convert solar energy to heat See through Saves $1,629/y ear Payback time of 5.26 years More energy efficient than CFL and incandesce nt Very short payback time Last longer than currently installed light bulbs Saves $31,842/ye ar Payback time of 0.42 years http://image1.masterfile.com/ em_w/03/17/39/860-03173928w.jpg http://sites.psu.edu/eklblog/files/2012/09/IMG_5886.jpg http://www.thenewecologist.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2012/11/Green-Christmas-Why-LED-Lights-Are-Better.jpg Decrease energy consumption Make lights last longer Can be easily installed with current lights Saves $1,751/year Payback time of 0.27 years http://www.bbcommercialsolutions.com/ uploadedImages/Content/Images/g.jpg LED Light Bulbs LED Dim m erSwitches SolarDrapes Totals N umberof M aterial N eeded 550 6 77 C ost perU nit of M aterial ($) 20 30 87.5 Total C ost of M aterial ($) 11,000 180 6,737.00 17,917 C ost of Labor($) 240 225 360 825 G& A C ost ($) 2248 81 1,419 3,748 Total Initial C ost ($) 13,488 486 8,517 22,491 Total KW hsaved (peryear) 241,228 13,267 12,346 266,841 Total EnergySavings$ (peryear) 31,842 1,751 1,629 35,223 Payback Period (years) 0.42 0.27 5.26 5.95 Ease of installation Safety Aestheticappeal Energy efficiency Payback time Initial costDurability Total % Weight Easeof installation 1 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 4.2 5.2 Safety 2 1 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 6.1 7.5 Aestheticappeal 0.67 0.83 1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 3.3 1.2 Energyefficiency 5 2.5 10 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 22.7 28.1 Payback time 5 2.5 5 0.83 1 1.2 1.5 17 21 Initial cost 3.33 2 5 3.57 0.83 1 1.1 16.8 20.8 Durability 2.5 1.67 3.33 0.625 0.67 0.9 1 10.7 13.2 Total = 80.9

description

Making East Commons More Sustainable. Team Lightning Bolts Penn State University By: Aesha Kewalramani , Dan Deegan , and Sarah Wood. The Problem : t he energy efficiency of East Commons is low because of excessive and unnecessary use of lighting and lack of sustainable use of energy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Making East Commons More Sustainable

Page 1: Making East Commons More Sustainable

Making East Commons More Sustainable

The Problem: the energy efficiency of East Commons is low because of excessive and unnecessary use of lighting and lack of sustainable use of energy.

What is Sustainability? The act of being environmentally responsible by making sure our non-renewable natural resources last longer and meet the needs of future generations as well.

http://www.pxd.com/images/values-content/sustainable2.png?sfvrsn=0

http://www.hfs.psu.edu/_cs_apps/pt_photo_gallery/uploads/UP%20Housing/original/Quad-in-East.png

Team Lightning BoltsPenn State University

By: Aesha Kewalramani, Dan Deegan, and Sarah Wood

Summary Statement: The East Halls Commons currently uses almost 300,000 kWh of electricity per year on lighting alone. Our plan involves two simple changes that will lower energy consumption by 80%. To accomplish this goal, Penn State should replace the current light bulbs with LED lights and install dimmer switches. These two changes would cost $13,700 with a payback period of 0.42 years, saving Penn State $33,600 per year. The second change involves installing Solar Drapes in the dining hall, reducing 12,300 kWh of heat  per year, with a savings of $1,600 per year. Solar Drapes have an upfront cost of $6, 700 and a payback period of 5.3 years. 

Original Design Ideas: • Motion Sensors• Light Dimmers• More energy efficient light

bulbs• Turning off the computers• Installing more efficient

windows and doors• Installing solar panels

Light Dimmers LED Lights Solar Heating Drapes

Conclusion:http://cfnewsads.thomasnet.com/images/large/469/469458.jpg

• Makes Penn State a more marketable campus.\

• The University becomes a role model.

• East becomes a more attractive place to live in.

• Will save Penn State over $35,000/year and 266,841 kWh a year

• Easily installed

• Convert solar energy to heat

• See through• Saves

$1,629/year• Payback

time of 5.26 years

• More energy efficient than CFL and incandescent

• Very short payback time

• Last longer than currently installed light bulbs

• Saves $31,842/year

• Payback time of 0.42 years

LED Light Bulbs LED Dimmer Switches Solar Drapes TotalsNumber of Material Needed 550 6 77Cost per Unit of Material ($) 20 30 87.5

Total Cost of Material ($) 11,000 180 6,737.00 17,917Cost of Labor ($) 240 225 360 825

G&A Cost ($) 2248 81 1,419 3,748Total Initial Cost ($) 13,488 486 8,517 22,491

Total KWh saved (per year) 241,228 13,267 12,346 266,841Total Energy Savings $ (per year) 31,842 1,751 1,629 35,223

Payback Period (years) 0.42 0.27 5.26 5.95

Ease of installation Safety Aesthetic appeal Energy efficiency Payback time Initial cost Durability Total % WeightEase of installation 1 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 4.2 5.2

Safety 2 1 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 6.1 7.5Aesthetic appeal 0.67 0.83 1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 3.3 1.2Energy efficiency 5 2.5 10 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 22.7 28.1

Payback time 5 2.5 5 0.83 1 1.2 1.5 17 21Initial cost 3.33 2 5 3.57 0.83 1 1.1 16.8 20.8Durability 2.5 1.67 3.33 0.625 0.67 0.9 1 10.7 13.2

Total = 80.9

http://image1.masterfile.com/em_w/03/17/39/860-03173928w.jpg

http://sites.psu.edu/eklblog/files/2012/09/IMG_5886.jpg

http://www.thenewecologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Green-Christmas-Why-LED-Lights-Are-Better.jpg

• Decrease energy consumption

• Make lights last longer

• Can be easily installed with current lights

• Saves $1,751/year• Payback time of 0.27

yearshttp://www.bbcommercialsolutions.com/uploadedImages/Content/Images/g.jpg