Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

57
Case for Family Violence Prevention Kenneth Steinman, PhD, MPH [email protected] Community Connections Workshop Gahanna, OH April 20, 2012 1

description

Presented by Kenneth Steinman, PhD, at The HealthPath Foundation of Ohio's Community Connections Workshop on April 20, 2012.

Transcript of Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Page 1: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

1

Making a Compelling Casefor

Family Violence PreventionKenneth Steinman, PhD, MPH

[email protected]

Community Connections WorkshopGahanna, OHApril 20, 2012

Page 2: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

2

Learning Objectives

1. Describe the “spectrum of prevention”

2. Describe 3 principles for making a compelling case for family violence

3. Access and use data for grant-writing

Page 3: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Outline» Framing prevention

» Framing the problem

» What are “family violence” data? Why don’t we use them? Why bother?

» How should I use data?

» Q&A

3

Page 4: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» When it works, nothing happens!

» Individual costs >> benefits˃ even when societal costs << benefits

» Someone pays, someone else benefits

4

Prevention is a hard sell

Page 5: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» is often easier than intervention˃ less political, more agencies

» can be cost-effective˃ economies of scale

» can work!

5

And yet, prevention…

Page 6: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

6

Prevention is a spectrum

Prevention Institute (1999)

» more than teaching healthy behaviors

» multiple, complementary levels

» at each level, identify most important effort(s)

Page 7: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

7

6. Influencing policy and legislation

5. Changing organizational practices

4. Fostering coalitions and networks

3. Educating providers

2. Promoting community education

1. Strengthening individual knowledge and skills

Spectrum of Prevention

Prevention Institute (1999)

Page 8: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

8

6. Influencing policy and legislation

Page 9: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

9

5. Changing organizational practices

Page 10: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

10

2. Promoting community education

Page 11: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

11

1. Strengthening individual knowledge and skills

Page 12: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

12

199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201010

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

2019.9

12.4

% of US adults smoking daily, 1995-2010

BRFSS (2011)

Page 13: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

13

6. Influencing policy and legislation

5. Changing organizational practices

4. Fostering coalitions and networks

3. Educating providers

2. Promoting community education

1. Strengthening individual knowledge and skills

How about Family Violence?

Prevention Institute (1999)

Page 14: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Outline» Framing prevention

» Framing the problem

» What are “family violence” data? Why don’t we use them? Why bother?

» How should I use data?

» Q&A

14

Page 15: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

15

Framing the problem(Consider) Show how our problem is…

» Common

» Consequential

» Changeable

Page 16: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» Common: “Every day, I see…”

» Consequential: “I lost my childhood…”

» Changeable: “The program saved me…”

16

Stories show how FV is…

Page 17: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» Common

» Consequential

» Changeable

17

How can data show FV is...?

Page 18: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» 1 in 5 US adults smoke daily, 1995

18

Smoking seen as… common

Page 19: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

19

tobacco

diet and activity patterns

alcohol

microbial agents

toxic agents

firearmsActual causes of death, US, 1990

McGinnis & Foege, 1993

…consequential

Page 20: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

20

…changeable

Smoking ban linked to drop in preterm

births, small babies

MyHealthNewsDaily

Page 21: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

» Common

» Consequential

» Changeable

21

How can data show FV is...?

Page 22: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Outline» Framing prevention

» Framing the problem

» What are “family violence” data? Why don’t we use them? Why bother?

» How should I use data?

» Q&A

22

Page 23: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

23

What are Family Violence Data?

Quantifiable information about

risk factors for,

scope of,

consequences of

family violence.

Page 24: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

24

FamilyViolence

Risk factor

Risk factor

Risk factor

Consequence

Consequence

Consequence

Page 25: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

25

Elder abuse

Substance abuse among adult caregivers

Elder’s social isolation

Elder’s significant needs for assistance

Accelerated move to LTC facility

APS investigations and interventions

Premature Mortality

Each year in Clark County…

2,137 seniors live alone in rental properties

>1,300 elders are physically abused, neglected or financially exploited

62 APS reports are filed for abuse, neglect or exploitation

Changeable CommonConsequential

Page 26: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

26

Where dowe find data?

Page 27: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Sources of FV data in Ohio» Case reports

˃ OIBRS, SACWIS, OVDRS

» Case tallies˃ Adult protective services summary reports (ODJFS)˃ Police call data (BCI)˃ Shelter data (AGO)˃ Civil protection orders (SCO)

» Surveys˃ YRBS: teen dating violence˃ OFHS: physical IPV 27

Page 28: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

28

www.hpio.net/familyviolence

Page 29: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Why don’t we use data?

29

I don’t care what the research says, we

need to do [X]!

I’ve helped fill out the forms these

data are based on. I know they’re

flawed.

Quantitative studies suppress victims’

voices.

You can get statistics to say anything you want.

The numbers don’t capture what’s really

going on here.

I’m afraid to use statistics because I don’t really get

them.

The study’s not valid because it didn’t include Latinas.

The study’s not valid because it didn’t include women who

didn’t seek help.

The study’s not valid because it didn’t include

emotional abuse.

Page 30: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Why don’t we use data?» Every source is imperfect

˃ especially for complex issues like FV

» Different “case” definitions ˃ fear of undercounting

» Difficult to find and report ˃ Access local level data˃ Skills to report findings accurately 30

Page 31: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

So why bother?

31

» If you don’t count it, it doesn’t count

» Build credibility

» The data favor FV

Page 32: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Outline» Framing prevention

» Framing the problem

» What are “family violence” data? Why don’t we use them? Why bother?

» How should I use data?

» Q&A

32

Page 33: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

How should I use data?» Planning

» Evaluation

» Grant-Writing

» Advocacy33

Use data to find an answer

Use data to support an answer

Page 34: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Showing FV is…common» Lifetime prevalence (“Have you ever?”)

˃ compelling˃ hard to change

» Annual incidence (new cases past year)˃ current scope˃ hardest to measure

» Case reports˃ incomplete ˃ easiest to measure, hard to compare

34

Page 35: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Showing FV is…common» Rates

35

» Raw numbers

Page 36: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Showing FV is…consequential» Association with other outcomes

˃ e.g., illness & injury; employment; disability˃ hard to quantify

» Cost˃ economic analyses˃ agency burden

36

Page 37: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Showing FV is…changeable» Highlight differences

˃ By jurisdiction˃ By time

» Program evaluation

37

Page 38: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

38

Mean # of Child Maltreatment Incidents per year (with 95% CI) per 1,000 Children Under 18 in 88 Ohio counties, 2001-2007

Statewide mean=33.8

Slide prepared by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project, a project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 614.292.3373 or [email protected]

Source: Ohio SACWIS

Page 39: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

When using data…» Keep it local

» Put it in context

39

Page 40: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

40

Keep it LOCAL

US: 2,135,000

Ohio: >88,000

Montgomery County: >4,100

IPV annual incidence

Page 41: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Put it in CONTEXT» Period

˃ How does my county compare to last year?

» Place˃ How does my county compare to others?

» Problem˃ How does IPV compare to other problems in my

county ?

41

Page 42: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

# new civil protection order filings per 1,000 residents:5 major metropolitan counties, 1996-2008

0

1

2

3

4

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Franklin

Source: Supreme Court of OhioSlide prepared by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project, a project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and the Ohio State University College of Public Health. 614.292.3373 [email protected]

Page 43: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

# new civil protection order filings per 1,000 residents:3 major metropolitan counties, 1996-2008

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080

1

2

3

4

Franklin

Hamilton

Lucas

Source: Supreme Court of OhioSlide prepared by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project, a project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and the Ohio State University College of Public Health. 614.292.3373 [email protected]

Page 44: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

54,409

30,719

66,000physical intimate partnerviolence*

motor vehicle accidentinjuries

new cases of cancer

Selected threats to women’s health in Ohio

Estimated number of cases per year

*not including sexual violence or emotional abuse

For sources, see notes. Slide prepared by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project, a project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 614.292.3373 or [email protected]

Page 45: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Using County Profiles

45

» www.hpio.net/familyviolence

» Common, Consequential, Changeable

Page 46: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Family Violence in

180 – 280 children are abused or neglected 550 – 720

adults are physically abused by a current or former intimate partner

680 – 870seniors in the community are abused, neglected or financially exploited

325reports of abuse or neglect are filed with children’s services

n/a people are arrested for intimate partner violence 50 – 100

seniors in LTC facilities are abused, neglected or financially exploited

87 children are placed in custody 35 people file petitions for

civil protection orders 79reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation are filed for seniors in the community

36adults seek shelter in domestic violence shelters in the county

18reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation are filed for seniors in LTC facilities

Belmont County

Each year in our county…

These data describe common types of violence perpetrated by family members or caregivers in our county each year. We present the best available, most recent estimates. Nonetheless, our figures are conservative and represent only part of the burden family violence places on our families and communities. All figures are estimates or annual averages.

• It is difficult to measure the true prevalence of family violence; many victims never come to the attention of authorities.

• Reports to local children’s service agencies typically exceed the estimated number of abused or neglected children. This is likely due to multiple reports filed for a single child. Also, many children are placed in custody for reasons other than abuse or neglect (e.g., delinquency).

• n/a = figure not available because of missing data.• Elder abuse/neglect figures exclude self-neglect and victims <60 years old. (LTC = long term care)

This profile is part of an 88-county series provided by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project – a collaborative project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and the Ohio State University College of Public Health with support from the HealthPath Foundation of Ohio. For additional copies and a detailed description of how we calculated these figures, please visit: www.healthpolicyohio.org/OFVPP_CountyProfiles.htmlSuggested citation: Health Policy Institute of Ohio. Family Violence in [county name] County. Columbus, OH: Health Policy Institute of Ohio; 2010.

Page 47: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

59

117

85

330

seniors (age 60+, est. # / year) adult women (age 18+, est. # / year) teenage girls (age 15-19, est. # /year)

motor vehicle crash injuries

new cancer cases

elder abuse/neglect

injuries from falls

new cancer cases

mothers without 1st trimester prenatal care

motor vehicle crash injuries

physical intimate partner violence

pregnancies

motor vehicle crash injuries

dating violence

cigarette use

In Belmont County, how does family violence compare to other threats among…?

Belmont County

Mean of 29 Appalachian

countiesState mean

Civil protection order petitions(per 10,000 adults) 6.4 28.9 21.6

Reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation in LTC facilities

(per 100 resident beds)1.8 2.2 2.3

Is family violence increasing?How do we compare to other counties?

• Belmont County has a lower rate of petitions for civil protection orders (CPO’s) compared to similar counties in Ohio.

• Belmont County has about the same rate of reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation in LTC facilities compared to similar counties in Ohio.

• Differences in data collection limit our ability to compare other indicators of family violence across counties.

It is hard to say. Some data sources suggest family violence is increasing; others suggest it is stable or decreasing. Within a county, changes over time are largely due to changes in victims’ ability to access

6.45.5

6.5

2000-02 2003-05 2006-08

services. This graph, for example, suggests no significant change in petitions for CPO’s in our county. This trend could reflect no changes in the awareness or ability of victims to request CPO’s. For a discussion of when differences are noteworthy, please see the introduction.

230

130

274

Mean annual rate of petitions for civil protection orders, per 10,000 adults,

Belmont County, 2000-2008

To talk with someone about family violence, contact:Child Abuse Hotline: 1-800-4-A-CHILDOhio Domestic Violence Network 1-800-934-9840Ohio Area Agencies on Aging: 1-866-243-5678

490-960320-560

680-870

• For example: each year in our county between 350 and 480 adult women experience physical intimate partner violence; in comparison, 274 adult women are injured in motor vehicle crashes.

150-230

350-480

Page 48: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

In Belmont County, DV is common

48

» Each year in our county at least 350 adult women experience physical intimate partner violence. In comparison, 274 are injured in motor vehicle crashes and are 230 newly diagnosed with cancer.

Page 49: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

In Belmont County, DV is consequential

49

» Each year in our county, local courts handle 35 petitions for civil protection orders and 36 adults seek shelter in local domestic violence shelters.

Page 50: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

In Belmont County, DV is changeable

50

» Compared to Belmont County, the rate of petitions for civil protection orders is nearly four times greater in other Appalachian counties (6.4 vs. 28.9 per 10,000 adults). Supporting our legal advocacy program will help us close this gap.

Page 51: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

The HealthPath Foundation of OhioService Area

ADAMS

ALLENASHLAND

ASHTABULA

ATHENS

AUGLAIZE

BELMONT

BROWN

BUTLER

CARROLL

CHAMPAIGN

CLARK

CLERMONT

CLINTON

COLUMBIANA

COSHOCTON

CRAWFORD

CUYAHOGA

DARKE

DEFIANCE

DELAWARE

ERIE

FAIRFIELD

FRANKLIN

FULTON

GALLIA

GEAUGA

GREENE

GUERNSEY

HAMILTON

HANCOCK

HARDIN

HARRISON

HENRY

HIGHLAND

HOCKING

HOLMES

HURON

JACKSON

JEFFERSONKNOX

LAKE

LAWRENCE

LICKING

LOGAN

LORAIN

LUCAS

MADISON

MAHONING

MARION

MEDINA

MEIGS

MERCER

MIAMI

MONROEMONTGOMERY

MORGAN

MORROW

MUSKINGUM

NOBLE

OTTAWA

PAULDING

PERRYPICKAWAY

PIKE

PORTAGE

PREBLE

PUTNAM

RICHLAND

ROSS

SANDUSKY

SCIOTO

SENECA

SHELBY

STARK

SUMMIT

TRUMBULL

TUSCARAWAS

UNION

VAN WERT

VINTON

WARRENWASHINGTON

WAYNE

WILLIAMS

WOOD

WYANDOT

FAYETTE

Another County?

51

Page 52: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Just beware…» FV is not equally common everywhere

» FV is not always getting worse

» Not all programs and policies work

52

Page 53: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

53

0

50

100

150

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009*

# of adult protective service reports in Preble County, Ohio: FY2007 – FY 2009

Source: Ohio Dept of Job & Family Services; US Census Bureau *projected

Slide prepared by the Ohio Family Violence Prevention Project, a project of the Health Policy Institute of Ohio and The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 614.292.3373 or [email protected]

Page 54: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

Outline» Framing prevention

» Framing the problem

» What are “family violence” data? Why don’t we use them? Why bother?

» How should I use data?

» Q&A

54

Page 55: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

55

Learning Objectives

1. Describe the “spectrum of prevention”

2. 3 principles for making a compelling case for family violence

3. Access and use data for grant-writing

C C C

www.hpio.net/familyviolence

Page 56: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

56

Questions/Comments

What if this makes

my agency look bad?

Page 57: Making a Compelling Case for Family Violence Prevention

57

Thank you