main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED...

210
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN NOTE :- [ ON 09.09.2020 ] REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 329-330/2004 IX GHAZI SAADUDDIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL Versus STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA THR. SECY AND ORS. S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] Connected C.A. No. 327/2004 IX BABITA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. CHIEF SECY. AND ORS. S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR Three Judges Bench Matter Connected C.A. No. 328/2004 IX BABITA SUBHASH KAGDA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. CHIEF SECY. AND ORS. S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, LAWYER S KNIT & CO Three Judges Bench Matter Connected C.A. No. 324-325/2004 IX SUNIL S/O BUTHWEL WADAGALI SANJAY JAIN Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECY. AND ORS. S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR Three Judges Bench Matter Connected W.P.(C) No. 180/2004 PIL-W CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND ANR. PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1] Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. S. P. SHARMA, R. C. KOHLI, P. N. PURI, GURMEET SINGH MAKKER, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[R-4], [R-5], A. RAGHUNATH[R-1], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-11], [R-12], [R-14], [R-16], BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-10], A. SUBBA RAO[R-13], K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-15], NAFIS A. SIDDIQUI[R-17], [R-18], SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-19], JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-20] MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[IMPL] KUMUD LATA DAS[INT] Connected W.P.(C) No. 94/2005 PIL-W D. DAVID ASHWANI BHARDWAJ Versus

Transcript of main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED...

Page 1: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

NOTE:-[ ON 09.09.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 329-330/2004

IXGHAZI SAADUDDIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusSTATE OF MAHARAHSTRA THR. SECYAND ORS.

S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, ANIRUDDHAP. MAYEE

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]ConnectedC.A. No. 327/2004IX

BABITA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.CHIEF SECY. AND ORS.

S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Three Judges Bench MatterConnectedC.A. No. 328/2004IX

BABITA SUBHASH KAGDA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. CHIEFSECY. AND ORS.

S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, LAWYERS KNIT & CO

Three Judges Bench MatterConnectedC.A. No. 324-325/2004IX

SUNIL S/O BUTHWEL WADAGALI SANJAY JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.SECY. AND ORS.

S. C. BIRLA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Three Judges Bench Matter

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 180/2004PIL-W

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTERESTLITIGATION AND ANR. PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

S. P. SHARMA, R. C. KOHLI, P. N. PURI,GURMEET SINGH MAKKER, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1],APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[R-4], [R-5], A.RAGHUNATH[R-1], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-11], [R-12], [R-14], [R-16], BHASKAR Y.KULKARNI[R-10], A. SUBBA RAO[R-13], K. V.BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-15], NAFIS A.SIDDIQUI[R-17], [R-18], SHEKHARKUMAR[R-19], JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-20]MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[IMPL]KUMUD LATA DAS[INT]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 94/2005PIL-W

D. DAVID ASHWANI BHARDWAJ

Versus

Page 2: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTUNION OF INDIA MININSTRY OFSOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2429-2430/2005IX

MILIND KONDU SAPKALE . AND ANR. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

Versus

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

Three Judges Bench Matter

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 625/2005PIL-W

A.I.UNITED CHRIS.MOVE.FOR E.RIGHTSAND ANR. SATYA MITRA[P-1], [P-2]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF SOCIALJUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 47/2006X

MOHD. SADIQ (FORMERLY DR. MUKESHKUMAR) AND ANR. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusUNION OF INDIA RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 38003/2013XII

S.GANAPATHY M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusUNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS HOMESECRETARY RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 13/2008PIL-W

AKHIL MAHARASHTRA MUSLIM KHATIKSAM. AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusUNION OF INDIA RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 579/2009PIL-W

ALL INDIA CHRISTIAN FEDERATION V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF SOCIALJUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT ANDORS.

RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-4],[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 109/2011PIL-W

M.A.SIDDIQUI AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA CABINETSECRETARIAT CABINET SECRETARY RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 259/2012PIL-W

UNITED FRONT FOR DALIT CHRISTIANRIGHTS S. GOWTHAMAN[P-1]

VersusMINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ANDEMPOWERMENT AND ANR. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 693/2017PIL-W

ALL INDIA CATHOLIC UNION P. I. JOSE

Versus

UNION OF INDIA A. RAGHUNATH[IMPL]FOR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 15/2020PIL-W

M. EZAZ ALI M. M. KASHYAP

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SATYA MITRA[IMPL]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 395/2020X

M. MARY JOHN S. GOWTHAMAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Page 3: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1454/2019X

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF DALITCHRISTIANS AND ANR. S. GOWTHAMAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1553/2019X

AAMIR RASHADI MADANI MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAWAND JUSTICE AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 36/2020PIL-W

K. MUTHU SWAMY SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI

VersusUNION OF INDIAFOR ADMISSION

2 C.A. No. 435/2007XIV-A

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusNATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGEMEMBERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. SAHIL TAGOTRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5076/2007XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusM/S CANNY SECURITIES PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5636/2007XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusGPSK CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED RAMESH BABU M. R.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2402/2008XVII

GPSK CAPITAL PVT. LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusSECURITIES & EXCHANGE BD.OF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 3003/2011XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusM/S ASPI NOSHIR GANDHI

3 C.A. No. 5007/2008XIV-A

KANGARO INDUSTRIES (REGD) ANDORS. VERNIKA TOMAR

VersusJAININDER JAIN AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRAFOR ON IA 2/2008 FOR ON IA 15679/2007 FOR ON IA 71095/2008 FOR ON IA33624/2009 FOR ON IA 95610/2012 FOR ON IA 8/2015

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.305/2009 In C.A. No.5007/2008XIV-A

JANINDER JAIN . AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

Versus

ARIHANT JAIN . AND ORS. VERNIKA TOMAR, [R-2], [R-3]

IN SLP(C) No. - 3362/2007, IN SLP(C) No. - 3362/2007, IN C.A. No. - 5007/2008,

4 C.A. No. 8743/2013X

REGISTRAR CANE COOPERATIVESOCIETIES ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1], P. N. GUPTA[P-1]

VersusGURDEEP SINGH NARVAL (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS.

T. N. SINGH[R-1], RAVI PRAKASHMEHROTRA[R-1], AKSHAT KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8744/2013X

REGISTRAR,CANE CO-OP.SOCIETIESAND ORS. ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1]

VersusAJAY KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. T. N. SINGH[R-1], AKSHAT KUMAR[R-1][GR]

Page 4: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

ConnectedC.A. No. 8745/2013X

REGISTRAR,CANE CO-OP.STY.,UTTARAKHAND AT KASHIPUR ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1]

VersusMUKHTAR SINGH HUDA AND ORS. AKSHAT KUMAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8746/2013X

BALKAR SINGH AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL THR.SECRETARY AND ORS.

AKSHAT KUMAR[R-1][GR], ABHISHEKATREY[R-1]

5 C.A. No. 6048/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER II ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S VIJAYAVANI EDUCATIONALINSTITUTION BALAJI COMPLEXNANDYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6054/2008XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES AND ORS. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONALCOMTTTEE C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 6431/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER INANDYAL AND ANR. G. N. REDDY[P-2]

VersusM/S KESHAVA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL

ConnectedC.A. No.6883-6885/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER II ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-6]

VersusM/S ST. JOSEPHS EDUCATIONALSOCIETY C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7461/2008XII-A

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,BENZCIRCLEVIJAYAWADA G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S GOWTHAM RESIDENTIAL JUNIORCOLLEGE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7385/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENZCIRCLE G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S GOWTHAM RES.JUNIOR COLLEGEAND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 149/2016XII-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S. VIGNAN PUBLISHERS LTD. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5423/2016XII-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)(INT) (FAC) G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S. VIGNAN PUBLISHERS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.7390-7396/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

Versus

M/S GOWTHAM RESIDENTIALJR.C0LLEGE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2009XII-A

STATE OF A.P. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

Versus

Page 5: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTM/S VIKAS MAHILA RESIDENTIALCOL.GUNTUR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2401/2009XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S NARAYANA COACHING CENTRE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 87/2010XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S JAWAHAR BHARATHI DEGREECOLLEGE AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM[R-1]

ConnectedDiary No. 16931-2017XII-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S VISWASANTHI EDUCATIONALINSTITUTIONS (P0 LTD AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.65931/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.65932/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

6 C.A. No. 4376/2008XII

CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. CHOLAYIL PHARMACEUTICALSTHROUGH ITS MD AMIT SHARMA

Remain on boardConnectedC.A. No. 5225/2013XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S TRIENI AYURVEDIC RESEARCHPHARMACEUTICALS THROUGH ITSDIRECTORS

AMIT SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6096/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI - I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. CHOLAYIL PHARMACEUTICALSLTD. THR. DIRECTOR AMIT SHARMA

7 C.A. No. 2565/2012XII

N.KANNAKI K. V. MOHAN[P-1]VersusSECRETARY TO GOVT. HOME (COURTSI.A) DEPARTMENT AND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1], S.THANANJAYAN[R-2]

8 C.A. No. 5675/2010XIV-A

KIRAN AGARWAL PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]VersusHIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-1]

9 C.A. No. 37/2009XVI

WESTINGHOUSE SAXBY FARMER LTD. KUNAL CHATTERJI[P-1]VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISECALCUTTA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

As per ROP dated 12.12.2019, list the matter after ensuing christmas and newyear.

10 C.A. No.3949-3958/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (EP) MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S MEHTA TRADING HOUSE P.LTD.ETC. ETC. PRAVEEN KUMAR

11 C.A. No. 3118/2009IX

RAHUL AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.SECRETARY AND ORS.

VISHWAJIT SINGH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, RANBIR SINGHYADAV[R-7]

Page 6: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 3117/2009IX

DHANRAJ NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

VIKRAM SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH, [R-4], RANBIR SINGHYADAV[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4071/2009IX

ARVIND CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusRURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTAND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,VISHWAJIT SINGH, [R-2]

12 C.A. No. 8667/2012IX

THE COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE),MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S PARAGON ASSETS CO.LTD..THROUGH MANAGER AND ORS.

JYOTI MENDIRATTA[R-1], R.PARTHASARATHY[R-2], M. P. DEVANATH[R-4],PRAVEEN KUMAR[R-6], [R-7], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],PURNIMA BHAT[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15],[R-16], [R-17]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8670/2012IX

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMOHD.ASLAM SAYEED

ConnectedC.A. No. 8672/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OFCUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusABDUL SATTAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8673/2012IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBAJIRAO P. GHOSALKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.1564-1567/2018III

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusJAGSON INTERNATION LTD. K. V. MOHAN[R-1]

13 C.A. No. 6383/2010XI-A

A.GOVINDAN K. PAARI VENDHANVersus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. R. SATHISH, T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR, C. K.SASI

14 C.A. No.8592-8593/2010XII

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusV.MOHAN AND ANR. AND ANR. M. P. VINOD

15 C.A. No.7154-7155/2010XI-A

THE NILAMBUR RUBBER CO. LTD. M. P. VINOD

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

16 C.A. No. 108/2013III-A

M/S.ASHOKA METAL DECOR PVT.LTD. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADETAX,LUCKNOW AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

17 C.A. No. 1335/2010XI-A

M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD. APARNA JHA[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXESAND ORS. R. SATHISH, C. K. SASI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Page 7: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT18 Crl.A. No. 2381/2010

IITHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusKIRAN PAL . AND ORS. PRAVEEN JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

19 C.A. No.4395-4397/2010X

PRIDE FORAMER S.A. GEETANJALI MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

20 C.A. No. 2845/2010XI-A

M/S STEEL AND INDUSTRIAL FORGINGSLTD. K J JOHN AND CO

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

21 C.A. No. 2702/2011IV-A

SIR M.VISVESWARAYA EDUCATIONTRUST SATYA MITRA GARG

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

22 C.A. No. 807/2011XIV-A

TONY ELECTRONICS LIMITED RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2662/2011XIV-A

SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IIINEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

23 C.A. No. 2851/2010IX

M/S. SURYA SAMUDRA HOLIDAYRESORT(P)LTD THROUGH ITSAUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCOMMNR. OF CUSTOMS(EXPORT)MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10602/2010IX

M.S.RAM E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCOMMR.OF CUSTOMS(EXPORT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10603/2010IX

RAJESH KUMAR E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCOMMR.OF CUSTOMS(EXPORT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

24 C.A. No.8945-8947/2011X

M/S. CITURGIA BIO-CHEMICALS LTD. REKHA PANDEY

Versus

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGHITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

RAJ SINGH RANA[CAVEAT], MANISH K.BISHNOI[CAVEAT], AMIT ANAND TIWARI,ABHISHEK ATREY[R-1], VINAY GARG[R-3],[R-7], ARUN K. SINHA[R-5], SUSHMASURI[R-9], BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-12],SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[R-13]

[ AT THE TOP OF THE BOARD ]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8993/2011X

CITURGIA BIO-CHEMICALS LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH AKSHARMA

SUJATA KURDUKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND . THROUGH ITSCHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

AMIT ANAND TIWARI[CAVEAT], ABHISHEKATREY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Page 8: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

25 C.A. No.4108-4110/2013XVI

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEPATNA

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1][GR], ANILKATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY (INDIA)LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

26 C.A. No. 10791/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S GLOBAL INDUSTRIES NIKHIL JAIN

27 C.A. No. 2079/2012XIV-A

DHARAM PAL SATYA PAL LTD AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDEDTAX AND ANOTHER B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8399/2017XIV-A

SOM FLAVOURS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDEDTAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

FOR ADMISSIONConnectedC.A. No.2879-2880/2014III

DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAXCOMMNR.APPEALS-3 AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

VersusVRN CERAMICS LTD. BINDI GIRISH DAVE, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2881-2888/2014III

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXCOMMISSIONER (2) ENFORCEMENTDIVISION 7

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

VersusRAVI ELECTRONICS

28 C.A. No. 6708/2013IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSBANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHIVA ANALYTICALS (INDIA)LIMITED

ConnectedC.A. No.7083-7086/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXTRIVANDRUM KERALA

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S KERALA STATEBEVERAGES(MANUFACTURING ANDMARKETING) CORPORATION

JOGY SCARIA

ConnectedC.A. No.9195-9197/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S KERALA STATE BEVERAGES(MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING)CORP.

JOGY SCARIA

29 C.A. No. 7709/2012XIV-A

DELHI HIGH COURT TH.REGISTRARGENL. C. K. SUCHARITA[P-1]

VersusRAMESH CHAND SANWAL AND ORS. NISHTHA KUMAR[R-1]

30 C.A. No.4950-4951/2012XIV-A

M/S. HONDA SIEL CARS INDIA LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

31 C.A. No. 4188/2014IV

BIRENDRA KAUR AND ANR. SATYA MITRA[P-1], [P-2], ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]Versus

Page 9: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

UNION OF INDIAB. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1]SHREE PAL SINGH[IMPL], K. ENATOLI SEMA,[IMPL]

I.A NOS. 5, 6 AND 7 to be listed at the time of hearing of the appeal as per Court'sorder dated 24.03.2014.AS PER MENTIONING VIDE ROP DATED 04.12.2019.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 331/2013PIL-W

ARVINDER KAUR SUSHIL BALWADA

VersusUNION OF INDIA

32 C.A. No. 1681/2016III

MORARJEE TEXTILES LTD. AND ANR. KAUSHIK LAIK[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MICRO,SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISESAND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL[R-3]

33 C.A. No.7284-7286/2013IV-A

M/S. SAMALKOT POWER LTD. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE II VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

LIST THESE MATTERS AFTER ENSUING HOLI HOLIDAYS, 2020.ConnectedC.A. No.7290-7291/2013IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVISAKHAPATNAM II B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. SAMALKOT POWER LIMITED ANDANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 7-8/2013ConnectedC.A. No.7287-7289/2013IV-A

M/S. RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE II VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

34 C.A. No. 6149/2013III

CST-BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusCANARA BANK K. V. MOHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1848/2018XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXHYDERABAD III

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSTATE BANK OF HYDERABAD SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]IA No.14421/2018-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.9386-9390/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX (LTU) BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCANARA BANK K. V. MOHAN[R-1]IA No.178525/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.178524/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.178523/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2908/2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE AND SERVICE TAX MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSYNDICATE BANK KUNAL VERMA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.37067/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.37066/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

Page 10: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedDiary No. 30965-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXHYDERABAD GST B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSTATE BANK OF HYDERABAD SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]IA No.147986/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.147987/2019-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 9981/2017XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSTATE BANK OF PATIALA BALANCE SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6359-6360/2013III

C.C.E MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S UNION BANK OF INDIA O. P. GAGGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6763/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusHDFC BANK LIMITED KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3015/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1][P-RES]

35 C.A. No. 6277/2017IV

D.K. MONGA GOPAL JHA[P-1][PR]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], ASHOKMATHUR[R-2]

36 C.A. No. 894/2016XII

SETHIYATHOPPU M.R.K.COOP. SUGARMILLS V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. B. BALAJI[CAVEAT], VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 898/2016XII

K. PARAMASIVAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 899/2016XII

K. SAMINATHAN S. THANANJAYAN

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.AND ORS.

B. BALAJI[CAVEAT], VINODH KANNA B.[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 897/2016XII

K. SATHYABHAMA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1], [R-2]

37 C.A. No.11346-11348/2016XI-A

M/S LEO RUBBERS . AND ANR. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No. 11349/2016XI-A

SHEENA J. MAMPARAMBIL HIMINDER LAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No. 11350/2016XI-A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

Page 11: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No.11351-11352/2016XI-A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

38 C.A. No. 4931/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4933/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No.4936-4937/2016IV-A

M/S CENTUM INDUSTRIES PVT LTD MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4889-4911/2016IV-A

M/S. KOTHARI SALES AND AGENCIES CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.16639-16645/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M/S. MANYATA PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

39 C.A. No. 6679/2013III

SKODA AUTO INDIA P LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[P-1]VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSIMPORTS JNCH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

40 C.A. No. 14145/2015IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S PARENTERAL DRUGS(INDIA)LIMITED EJAZ MAQBOOL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20909/2013IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PARENTERAL DRUGS (INDIA ) LTD. EJAZ MAQBOOL

ConnectedC.A. No. 14181/2015IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S INVEN PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

41 C.A. No. 516/2015XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, TRADEAND TAX DEPARTMENT B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

AMIT AHUJA . AND ORS. RAHUL JAIN, [R-2], SUDHANSU PALO[R-5],JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[R-6]

42 C.A. No. 11928/2016XIV-A

MOOL PRAVAH AKHIL BHARAT NEPALEKTA SAMAJ AND ANR. M. C. DHINGRA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF H.P. AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6]

Page 12: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT43 C.A. No. 7430/2018

IV-ABURN STANDARD COMPANY LTD SATISH KUMAR[P-1]Versus

M/S SAMADARIYA BUILDERS AND ORS.RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1], CHANDERSHEKHAR ASHRI[R-1]RANJAN MUKHERJEE[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No.7431-7434/2018IV-A

STATE OF M.P AND ORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

BURN STANDARD CO. LTD ETC. SATISH KUMAR[R-1]

44 C.A. No.10775-10776/2014IV

ANIL KUMAR BIMAL RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], KAMAL MOHANGUPTA[R-1], ASHOK MATHUR[R-2]

Let the matter be added to the hearing list in the first week of August, 2018 and belisted before the appropriate Bench as per Hon'ble Court Order dated 04.01.2018

45 C.A. No. 4342/2015XVII

BAHADUR RAM MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusU.O.I AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4/2015

46 C.A. No. 247-251/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SYMPHONY LTD. THROUGHGENERAL MANAGER SHRI PARESH P.MEHTRA

PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL, MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 9060/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX, CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, A BLOCK, SURYANAGAR, ALWAR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S MIRAJ DRYMIX PVT LTD CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.1488-1491/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CGST CC AND CE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

MIRAJ DRYMIX PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]IA No.3959/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.3964/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.3963/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

ConnectedC.A. No.10202-10211/2014III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE &SERVICE TAX, VADODARA-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S KISAN MOULDINGS LTD. . ANDORS.

M. P. DEVANATH[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-3],SUPRIYA JUNEJA[R-2], [R-4], RAHULNARAYAN[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.10198-10201/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNIRMAL R. RUPAREL

47 C.A. No. 4443/2017III-A

RADHEY SHYAM MISHRA PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusTHE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OFINDIA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ELECTIONCOMMISSIONER AND ORS.

MOHIT D. RAM, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

Page 13: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT48 C.A. No. 13522/2015

IIICOMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-2]VersusNARENDRA POLY PRINTS LTD ANDANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 13526/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX &ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusVOLTAS LTD AND ANR. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13523/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusJINDAL PHOTO LTD SURUCHII AGGARWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 13524/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusUNIVERSAL COMFORT PROD. LTD ANDANR. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13525/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusRAMCO INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM

ConnectedC.A. No. 13527/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX DADRAAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBLUE STAR LTD. & ANR. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13928/2015III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusPRISM CEMENT LTD. THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR AND ANR. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

49 Crl.A. No. 1769/2014II-C

RAJESH GUPTA RANJEETA ROHATGIVersusSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OFINVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

MATTER RELEASED FROM PART HEARD50 C.A. No. 10871/2014

IIIINDIAN HOTELS AND ANR. DIKSHA RAIVersus

THE UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 176/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusFEDERATION OF HOTELS ANDRESTAURANTS ASSOCIATION OF INDIAAND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 6978/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ROYAL RESTAURANT AND BAR HITENDRA NATH RATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20679/2015XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

XAVIERS RESIDENCY . AND ANR. RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-1], NISHE RAJENSHONKER[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22348/2015XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

Page 14: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTHOTEL ROSE RESIDENCY . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22347/2015XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA BAR HOTELS ASSOCIATION .AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], , [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6948/2015XI-A

UNION OF INDIA FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. KERALA CLASSIFIED HOTELS ANDRESORTS ASSOCIATION (REG NO. T1832/2009) AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 46315/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 11931/2016XIV-A

FEDERATION OF HOTELS ANDRESTAURANTS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA. AND ORS.

SWETA RANI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3537/2017XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

KERALA CLASSIFIED HOTELS AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-6], ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1],[R-5], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ONLY CIVIL APPEAL NO.3537 OF 2017 TO BE LISTED BEFORE REGISTRARCOURT.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20680/2015XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOUTH MALABAR TRADINGCOMPANY . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.15586-15587/2014XII-A

UOI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S SRI RAJA RAJESHWARIRESTARUANT AND BAR, ETC. HITENDRA NATH RATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2898/2015XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXVISAKHAPATNAM I AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SIRI RESTAURANT AND BAR ANNAM D. N. RAOFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2899/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S GOPI KRISHNA RESTAURANT ANDBAR HITENDRA NATH RATH

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2902/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PARADISE MINI RESTAURANT ANDBARFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2903/2015XII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE, AND SERVICE TAX,VISHAKHAPATNAM AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SARIGAMA RESTAURANT AND BAR M. RAMBABU AND CO.

Page 15: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2904/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S GURUJEE RESTAURANT AND BAR HITENDRA NATH RATHFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24282/2014XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SRI SUDHA RESTARAUNT AND BAR HITENDRA NATH RATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24278/2014XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PARADISE RESTAURANT AND BAR HITENDRA NATH RATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2900/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S GALAXY RESTAURANT AND BARFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 6979/2015XII-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SRI DEVI RESTAURANT AND BARAND ORS. HITENDRA NATH RATH

51 C.A. No.6399-6401/2014III

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER(HEAD TS)

GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM (IMPORT)MUMBAI

52 C.A. No. 8647/2014XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PORT),KOLKATA A. N. ARORA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 2/201453 C.A. No. 1648/2015

XIICOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S ITC LTD. PACKAGING RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 9166/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusITC LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RAJAN NARAIN

54 T.P.(C) No.1363-1377/2014XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

KSK ENERGY VENTURES LTD. AND ORS. R. CHANDRACHUD, , E. C. AGRAWALA, BINAGUPTA, MEERA MATHUR[R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5599/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 40/2015XVI-A

INDIA BULLS POWER LIMITED

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY

Page 16: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedT.C.(C) No. 61/2015XVI-A

M/S. GUPTA ENERGY PVT.LTD. MUNAWWAR NASEEM

VersusUNION OF INDIA A. N. ARORA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 35/2015XVI-A

MAITHON POWER LTD.

VersusUNION OF INDIA ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.5633-5634/2017III

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

PATEL ENGINEERING LTD. ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 12/2016XVI-A

RATTANINDIA POWER LTD. VIKAS UPADHYAY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 32/2016XVI-A

RATTANINDIA POWER LTD VIKAS UPADHYAY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 46/2016XVI-A

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD. VIKAS UPADHYAY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.5602-5603/2017XIV-A

M/S ROSA POWER SUPPLY CO. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 3/2017XVI-A

M/S. PUNJ LLOYD LIMITED THROUGHGENERAL MANAGER DIKSHA RAI[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECREARY

ConnectedC.A. No. 5595/2017III

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusALSTOM INDIA LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 36/2015XVI-A

MAITHON POWER LTD.

VersusUNION OF INDIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 37/2015XVI-A

MAITHON POWER LTD.

VersusUNION OF INDIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 31/2015XVI-A

KSK ENERGY VENTURES LIMITED ANR. BINA GUPTA

VersusUNION OF INDIA ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 88/2014XVI-A

GMR POWER CORPORATION LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS GMRVASAVIPOWER CORPORATION LTD.)THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZ

R. CHANDRACHUD

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 17: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedT.C.(C) No. 89/2014XVI-A

ALSTOM INDIA LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 24/2015XVI-A

GMR RAJAHMUNDRY ENERGY LTD.ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusUNION OF INDIA ORS. R. CHANDRACHUD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 23/2015XVI-A

GMR VEMAGIRI POWER GENERATIONLTD. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY R. CHANDRACHUD, RICHA KAPOOR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 27/2015XVI-A

ROSA POWER SUPPLY COMPANYLIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMERCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 28/2015XVI-A

RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 26/2015XVI-A

RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 30/2015XVI-A

KSK ENERGY VENTURES LIMITED BINA GUPTA

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 32/2015XVI-A

KSK ENERGY VENTURES LIMITED BINA GUPTA

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 33/2015XVI-A

KSK ENERGY VENTURES LIMITED BINA GUPTA

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8259/2018III

GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITYCORPORATION LIMITED UTTARA BABBAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

55 C.A. No. 9188/2015XII

M/S.REVATHI ENTERPRISES REP. BY ITSPARTNER MR. R. SRINIVASAN PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusM/S. GOEL INDUSTRIES REP. BY ITSPROPRIETOR MR. RAM NIVAS GOEL

56 C.A. No. 3338/2017IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusS.P. CONSTRUCTION NEERAJ SHEKHAR

57 C.A. No.4453-4454/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHREEJI SHIPPING E. C. AGRAWALA

58 C.A. No.6462-6464/2015XIV-A

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

Versus

Page 18: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTNONGTHOMBAM RAJENDRA SINGH

59 C.A. No.5463-5464/2015XVI

GYANENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.ETC POOJA DHAR[P-1]

VersusBIHAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY PATNAAND ANR ETC ETC AND ORS.

RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], GOPALSINGH[R-2]

60 C.A. No. 2691/2017III

THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]VersusA.M DESAI AND ANR. RAJIVKUMAR[R-1]

61 C.A. No. 1022/2017XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. THROUGHCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD - III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

62 C.A. No. 14654/2015XII-A

ASHANNAGRI JEEVAN REDDY VANDANA SEHGALVersusTALARI SATYARN SATYA MITRA

63 C.A. No. 13300/2015III

M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. R. PARTHASARATHYVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS KANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 3108/2016IV

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISENVersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. AND ORS.A.K BHADURI AUTHORISED SIGNATORYAND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA, [CAVEAT], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1624/2019XVII-A

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED (EARLIERKNOWN AS VODAFONE ESSARLIMITED)

PUNIT DUTT TYAGI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.26151/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.26516/2019-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

65 C.A. No. 573-574/2016IV-A

COMMISSINER OF CUSTOMS, ANDCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONALCOMMITTEE CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11346/2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFSERVICE TAX PUNE III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHREE CHANAKYA EDUCATIONSOCIETYFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.61540/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 9977/2018XII-A

M/S NRI ACADEMY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.For Interim Relief

66 C.A. No. 1398/2016XII

ITC LTD. THR. ITS REGIONAL MANAGERMR. MANOJ CHAUHAN RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,(ADJUDICATION) CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

Page 19: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT67 C.A. No. 733/2016

XVISTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJIVersusM/S. KOMAL CONSTRUCTION S.K. SINHA

68 C.A. No.5420-5421/2017III-A

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHIACOLLEGE AND THE SCHOOL ANDOTHER CONNECTED INSTITUTIONSAND ANR.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

VersusDR. SYED AKHTAR HASAN RIZVI . ANDORS.

RAJAT SINGH[R-1], HARISH PANDEY[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10975/2018III-A

KAYASTHA PATHSHALA PRAYAG ANDANR. ANAND VARMA[P-1]

Versus

T.P. SINGH AND ORS. T. N. SINGH[R-1], HARISH PANDEY[R-2],TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-3], [R-4]

69 Crl.A. No.426-427/2016II-B

SURESHBHAI FAKABHAI MACHHI SOMESH CHANDRA JHA

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEREF; HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 27.01.2020 LIST THE MAIN APPEAL FORFINAL HEARING IN THE ENSUING SUMMER VACATION, 2020

70 C.A. No. 3593/2017XIV-A

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusM/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3594/2017XIV-A

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusM/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY E. C. AGRAWALA

71 C.A. No. 7344/2016IV-A

MOHAMMAD AKBAR V. D. KHANNA[P-1]VersusASHOK SAHU AND ORS. AKSHAY GIRISH RINGE[R-1]

72 C.A. No.9162-9164/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX LTU, CHENNAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS(I) PVT. LTD. THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

S. GOWTHAMAN, PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1][PR]

73 C.A. No. 9480/2017XIV-A

M/S. OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE ANDCONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. B. RAMANA MURTHY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

74 C.A. No. 2357/2017XIV-A

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], K. R.SASIPRABHU[R-1][INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ][ TOP OF THE BOARD ]75 C.A. No. 5453/2017

XIV-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusTHE BULLION AND JEWELLERSASSOCIATION(REGD) KISHORE KUNAL

Page 20: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No.5458-5459/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. J.B. OVERSEAS KISHORE KUNAL

76 C.A. No. 17503/2017IV-A

SHIVARAYAPPA ANIRUDH SANGANERIAVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, SHAILESH MADIYAL

77 C.A. No. 11276/2016IV-A

M/S. BUDHIA AUTO . AND ANR. AWANISH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANDORS. NISHANTH PATIL[R-1], [R-2]

78 C.A. No. 3942/2017IV

MONIKA SANJAY JAINVersus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.SATISH VIG, MONIKA GUSAIN, MITTER &MITTER CO.[CAVEAT], R. C.KAUSHIK[R-12][PR], [R-19][PR], [R-21][PR]

79 C.A. No. 8189/2017XII-A

THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF THEANDHRA EVANGELICAL LUTHERNCHURCH

M. SARADA

VersusTHE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THECENTRAL GUNTUR SYNOD . AND ANR. SUMANTH NOOKALA

80 C.A. No. 1220/2017XII-A

K USHA RANI VISHAL ARUNVersusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AND THE STATE OFANDHRA PRADESH THR AND ANR.

A. N. ARORA, MAHFOOZ AHSAN NAZKI[R-2]

81 C.A. No. 5676/2017III

REKHA DEEPAK LOHBANDE NACHIKETA JOSHIVersus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, ATULBABASAHEB DAKH[R-1]

IA No.89866/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION and IANo.89869/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

82 C.A. No. 10476/2017XI-A

V.R. SOJI ARCHANA PATHAK DAVEVersusVEENA GEORGE AND ANR. KMNP LAW AOR[R-1]

83 C.A. No. 9001/2017XVII-A

INDO HONG KONG INDUSTRIES PVTLTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusC.C.E. AND S.T. DELHI (ADJUDICATION) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

84 W.P.(C) No. 514/2017X

WORLD COLLEGE OF MEDICALSCIENCES AND RESEARCH ANDHOSPITAL AND ANR.

GAURAV[P-1], [P-2]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 56726/2017 FOR APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 79050/2017

85 C.A. No. 10259/2017XII

SAIDAI SA. DURAISAMY SURESHAN P.Versus

STALIN M.K. AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1], RAKESH K.SHARMA[R-25]

Page 21: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTIA No.73960/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.73962/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.137356/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.137358/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.2613/2018-I/A FOR PERMISSION TODELETE THE RES. NOS. 2 TO 26 IN THE PRESENT CASE AND AMEND THE CAUSETITLE and IA No.2717/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS andIA No.2718/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

86 C.A. No.11044-11046/2017XII

THE TRAFFIC MANAGER CHENNAIPORT TRUST AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusM/S SATHYA GRANITIES VIKASH SINGH[R-1]

87 C.A. No.10270-10271/2017XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERALAND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MALA PETROCHEMICALS ANDPOLYMERS ANJALI JHA[R-1]

88 C.A. No.9198-9199/2018XIV-A

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTARUN KUMAR SINHA PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]

89 C.A. No.9006-9007/2018XV

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT ADVOCATESASSOCIATION JODHPUR SURYA KANT

Versus

BAR COUNCIL OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMAD[R-1], ARDHENDUMAULIKUMAR PRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.9008-9009/2018XV

DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION AJMER DUSHYANT PARASHAR

Versus

BAR COUNCIL OF RAJASTHAN ANDANR.

IRSHAD AHMAD[R-1], ARDHENDUMAULIKUMAR PRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.9002-9003/2018XV

BAR ASSOCIATION JAIPUR SURYA KANT

Versus

BAR COUNCIL OF RAJASTHAN ANDANR. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-2]

90 C.A. No. 9350/2018III

GUJARAT TERCE LABORATORIES LTD USHA NANDINI. VVersusOMRON CORPORATION (A JAPANESECORPORATION) SATYA MITRA GARG[CAVEAT]

91 Crl.A. No. 363/2018II-A

MANOJ KANTILAL NIDHANE AND ANR. SANDEEP SUDHAKAR DESHMUKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

92 W.P.(C) No. 690/2018X

AKASH INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTREAND HOSPITAL AND ANR.

DEVASA & CO.[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2]

93 C.A. No. 2966/2019XII

KAJAL AGARWAL SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. V.V.D.AND SONS PVT. LTD RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.140478/2018-PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS

94 C.A. No. 11183/2018XI-A

K.M. SHAJI PALLAVI PRATAPVersusM. V. NIKESH KUMAR AND ORS. P. V. DINESH[CAVEAT]

Page 22: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 249/2019XI-A

K.M. SHAJI PALLAVI PRATAP

VersusT.V. BALAN P. V. DINESH[R-1]FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 5769/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 15110/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 1230/2019XI-A

M.V. NIKESH KUMAR P. V. DINESH

VersusK.M. SHAJI AND ORS. PALLAVI PRATAP[CAVEAT]IA No.4938/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.4939/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.4936/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

95 C.A. No. 11269/2018III

RAJESH LAHANU KASHIWAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusTHE RETURNING OFFICER AND ANR. PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[CAVEAT]

96 C.A. No. 3955/2019III

PABUBHA VIRAMABHA MANEK SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDIVersusAHIR MERAMANBHAI MARAKHIBHAIAND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedDiary No. 26441-2019III

AHIR MERAMANBHAI MARAKHIBHAI CHRISTI JAIN

VersusPABUBHA VIRAMABHA MANEK ANDORS.IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 114862/2019 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 114863/2019

97 C.A. No. 1808/2020XVII

KALYANI TRANSCO CHARU AMBWANIVersus

M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD.AND ORS.

AKHIL ANAND[CAVEAT], CYRIL AMARCHANDMANGALDAS AOR[CAVEAT], S. S.SHROFF[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.29327-29328/2019XVII

COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS CYRIL AMARCHAND MANGALDAS AOR[P-1]

Versus

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ANDORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], FAISAL SHERWANI[R-2], S. S. SHROFF[R-3], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-4]RANJEETA ROHATGI[IMPL]SOAYIB QURESHI[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }ConnectedC.A. No.2192-2193/2020XVII

SANJAY SINGAL AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI

Versus

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.

SOUMYA DUTTA[CAVEAT], SOAYIBQURESHI[CAVEAT], S. S.SHROFF[CAVEAT][CAVEAT], AKHILANAND[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT], CYRILAMARCHAND MANGALDASAOR[CAVEAT][CAVEAT], [R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-6]

{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 } IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 34999/2020 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 35002/2020 FOR EX-PARTESTAY ON IA 35003/2020 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 39037/2020

Page 23: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 2225/2020XVII

JALDHI OVERSEAS PTE. LTD. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR

Versus

MAHENDER KUMAR KHANDELWAL ANDORS.

SOUMYA DUTTA[CAVEAT], S. S.SHROFF[CAVEAT][CAVEAT], AKHILANAND[CAVEAT], CYRIL AMARCHANDMANGALDAS AOR[CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.47731/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.46583/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:02:07

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 24: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 2HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYNOTE:-[ ON 08.09.2020 AND 10.09.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.13345-13346/2015IV-A

SYED MOHAMMED GHOUSE PASHAKHADRI RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusSYED MOHAMMED ADIL PASHA KHADRI. AND ORS.

PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1], VIKASH SINGH[R-1],P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]

IA NO. 27334/2019 (FOR DELETION OF RESPONDENT NO. 7 AND HIS LRS FROMTHE ARRAY OF PARTIES )IN CA 13345-13346/2016 TO BE LISTED a/w appeal (r/p29.04.2019)

2 C.A. No. 182/2016IV-A

SHEELA GEHLOT ARUN K. SINHA[P-1]Versus

MOHINI HARDAYAL SINGH . AND ORS.RAM SWARUP SHARMA, NIKILESHRAMACHANDRAN, KARANJAWALA & CO.,ARJUN HARKAULI, TINA GARG[R-1], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 190/2016IV-A

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK TINA GARG[P-1]

Versus

MOHINI HARDAYAL SINGH . AND ORS.RAM SWARUP SHARMA, NIKILESHRAMACHANDRAN, KARANJAWALA & CO., A.VENAYAGAM BALAN, SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 191/2016IV-A

JAGMINDER SINGH NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

Versus

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS.SANJAY KAPUR, TINA GARG[R-1], SENTHILJAGADEESAN, RAM SWARUP SHARMA, A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

3 C.A. No. 238/2016XIV-A

DELHI DEVT.AUTHORITY SAHARYA & CO.VersusM/S CHANDER KANT . AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 239/2016XIV-A

DELHI DEVT.AUTH. BINU TAMTA

VersusM/S JAGAT

4 C.A. No. 8910/2010IV-A

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIALINVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD.

NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1]

Versus

Page 25: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

M/S. NAGARUJUA RESIDENCY AND ORS.ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-1], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-2], [R-3], SHAILESHMADIYAL[R-4]

5 C.A. No. 8714/2010III

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYARVersus

JAN BALAZ . AND ORS. KAMINI JAISWAL, SHEELA GOEL[CAVEAT],HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 95/2015PIL-W

JAYASHREE WAD TAMALI WAD

Versus

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOMEAFFAIRS SECRETARY AND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI, GAURAV SHARMA, GAGANGUPTATARUNA SINGH GOHIL[INT]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 841/2015X

PAVAN AGRAWAL PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. TAMALI WAD[INT]

6 Crl.A. No. 758/2010II-C

JAYAMMA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[P-1], [P-2]VersusHOME DEPARTMENT SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 573/2016II-C

LACHMA S/O CHADYANAIKA . AND ANR. VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1][GR]

7 C.A. NO. 6884/2012IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[]Versus

SATISH JAIN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], ASHWANI KUMAR[R-2],SANJAY K. AGRAWAL[R-3]

8 C.A. No. 6903/2011XI-A

RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTAGENCY S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1], PARMANANDGAUR[R-3]

9 C.A. No. 2950/2011IV-A

MAKARDHWAJ RAM LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGHVersusJAGDISH RAI (DEAD) TH. LRS. AND ANR. GOPAL PRASAD

10 C.A. No. 3032/2012XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]VersusPARYA VARAN AVAM JANUTHANMISSION (REGD. SOCIETY) AND ORS.

VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1], [R-2],ASHWANI KUMAR[R-3], SUSHMA SURI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3033/2012XIV-A

REGARPURA RESIDENT WELFAREASSOCIATION (REGD). AND ANR. P. N. RAMALINGAM[P-1]

VersusPARYAVARAN AVAM JANUTHAMMISSION (REGD.) SOCIETY AND ORS.

VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1], P.PARMESWARAN[R-2], ASHWANI KUMAR[R-3]

11 C.A. No. 8740/2013IV

DALJIT RAI OBEROI (DEAD) THR. LRS. JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersus

FINANCIAL COMMR AND SECRETARYTO GOVT. OF HARYANAREHABILITATION DEPARTMENT ANDORS.

VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-2],DELHI LAW CHAMBERS[R-3.2], [R-3.2], [R-3.1],[R-3.1], [R-3], [R-3], [R-3.4], [R-3.4], [R-3.3],[R-3.3], [R-4], [R-4], [R-5], [R-5], [R-6], [R-6],RITESH KUMAR[R-13.1], [R-13]

12 C.A. No. 7787/2011III

PARKLAND AVENUE CO-OPERATIVEHSTY LTD. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSTATE OF GUAJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI

Page 26: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7788/2011III

PARKLAND AVENUE CO-OP HSGSOC.LTD. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI

13 C.A. No. 5809/2011IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-3]

VersusASPI CHONEY AND ANR. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.26906-26911/2011IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

Versus

SHANKAR DEY AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[R-1], FAISAL SHERWANI [R-1],BINA GUPTA[R-1]

14 C.A. No. 6124/2011IX

NARAYAN SITARAM BADWAIK (DEAD)THR. LRS. B. SUNITA RAO

VersusBISARAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

15 C.A. No. 4353/2010IV-A

STATE OF CHHATISGARH AND ANR. NISHANTH PATILVersusM/S SAL UDYOG(P) LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[CAVEAT]

16 C.A. No.2312-2313/2010XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. ANDORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusM/S. LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD ETC.AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO., COAC

17 C.A. No.1852-1853/2018XII-A

M/S MESSAGE ADS PVT. LTD Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusA. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.LTD. AND ORS.

VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLUARJUN KRISHNAN[I-1][IMPL][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1854/2018XII-A

APSRTC TR.VICE CHAIRMAN AND M.D. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

VersusM/S MESSAGE ADS.P.LTD.TR.M.D. ANDANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1855/2018XII-A

APSRTC TR.CHAIRMAN AND M.D.. ANDANR. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

VersusM/S MESSAGE ADS P.LTD.TR.M.D.

18 C.A. No. 3487/2011III-A

M/S NOIDA LIGHTING SUDARSHAN RAJAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH THE REVENUE SECRETARYAND ORS.

BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

19 C.A. No. 3454/2011XI-A

M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURALENGINEERS PVT. LTD. DEVENDRA SINGH

VersusSTATE OF KERALA BINA MADHAVAN

20 C.A. No. 7895/2013III-A

LATURI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS S. R. SETIAVersusSATISH CHANDRA . AND ANR.

21 C.A. No. 2023/2010XI-A

ABAD BUILDERS (P) LTD. C. K. SASI[P-1]VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATAND ANR. BINA MADHAVAN[R-1], K. RAJEEV[R-1]

Page 27: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2ConnectedC.A. No. 2024/2010XI-A

BAY SHORE SEA WOOD PROJECTS, REP.BY PARTNER C. K. SASI

VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ANR. K. RAJEEV, BINA MADHAVAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2025/2010XI-A

LUCIYA HOTEL AND RESORTS (P) LTD. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ANR. BINA MADHAVAN[R-1], K. RAJEEV[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2027/2010XI-A

ABAD BUILDERS (P) LTD. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ANR. BINA MADHAVAN[R-1], K. RAJEEV[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2031/2010XI-A

ABAD BUILDERS (P) LTD. C. K. SASI

VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ANR. K. RAJEEV, R. SATHISH[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2026/2010XI-A

TRINITY ARCADE(P) LTD. C. K. SASI

VersusCHENGAMANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ANR. BINA MADHAVAN

ConnectedC.A. No.2032-2033/2010XI-A

SKYLINE FOUNDATIONS ANDCONSTRUCTIONS (P) LTD. M. P. VINOD[P-1]

VersusTHRIKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT ANDANR.

BINA MADHAVAN, K. RAJEEV[R-1], G.PRAKASH[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7418/2010XI-A

JAIRAJ PROJECTS ROMY CHACKO

VersusTHRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT .AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, G. PRAKASH, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8044/2010XI-A

DESAI HOMES V. K. MONGA

VersusTHRIKAKARA GRAM PANCHAYAT ANDANR. R. SATHISH

22 C.A. No. 199/2012IV-A

NIRMALA AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAINVersus

ASGAR ALI AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA, SATISH KUMAR, SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-10]

23 C.A. No. 11416/2011IV

M/S. V.K. AGGARWAL AND CO. RACHANA JOSHI ISSARVersusBHUMA NIKETAN P. N. PURI

24 C.A. No. 9474/2010XII

SAMMANASU MARY M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusPERIA PAZHANICHAMI AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

25 C.A. No. 8646/2011IV-A

NAYEEM SAB @ NAYEEM BASHA ANDANR. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusS. J. GNANACHANDRA S. N. BHAT

Page 28: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

26 C.A. No.10170-10171/2010IX

M/S. ALCON RESORT HOLDINGS PVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ANDANR. AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 10196/2010IX

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ANDANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusM/S ALCON RESORT HOLDINGS P.LTD.THROUGH MR. VICTORALBUGQUERQUE MANAGING DIRECTOR

MITTER & MITTER CO.

27 C.A. No. 216/2011IV

KESAR SINGH ANIS AHMED KHANVersusJODH SINGH AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

28 C.A. No. 7025/2011XI-A

SILPI REALTORS AND CONTRACTORSPRIVATE LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusM/S ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA)LTD. AND ORS. C. K. SUCHARITA, [R-2]

29 C.A. No.1861-1864/2015III

STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

Versus

BABABHAI JIVABHAI PATEL(D) BY LRS.AND ORS.

NIRNIMESH DUBE[R-18], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39]

30 C.A. No. 8346/2011III-A

SUBHASH TIWARI ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

31 C.A. No. 9773/2010IV

SAMIR KANTI BASU RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA[R-1], JATINDER KUMARBHATIA[R-2], [R-3]

32 C.A. No. 2997/2011XIV-A

BASANTU RISHI MALHOTRAVersusSALOCHANA DEVI AND ORS. S. JANANI

33 Crl.A. No. 56/2011II-B

KANWAR SAIN RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], SANJAY KUMARVISEN[R-1]

FDR NOW BEARS MATURITY ON 13.05.2020.34 C.A. No. 6656/2013

III-AHAZI SHAFAAT HUSAIN (D) THR. LRS. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH[P-1]Versus

SANJEEDA PARVEEN AND ORS.TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], MONA K. RAJVANSHI[R-1], [R-8],SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-9], YADAVNARENDER SINGH[R-10]

35 C.A. No. 8411/2014XV

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUSTBIKANER ADARSH NAIN[P-1]

VersusGORDHAN DASS(D) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

36 C.A. No. 3142/2010XI-A

GOVT. OF KERALA AND ANR. G. PRAKASHVersusJOSEPH AND ORS. P. VINAY KUMAR, K.PARAMESHWAR

Page 29: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 237 C.A. No. 6023/2012

XVIIPARITOSH CHOUDHARY SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEPARTMENT OF LAND REFORMSTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY

TULIKA MUKHERJEE[R-1]

38 C.A. No.10916-10917/2016IV-A

DESHRAJ SINGH PARMAR AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH

VersusRAM BABU AGARWAL . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, FAISAL SHERWANI [R-2.1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10448/2016IV-A

RAM BABU AGARWAL PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusDESHRAJ SINGH PARMAR . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, PUJA SHARMAto FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 62674/2017 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 62675/2017 FOR [I/A FOR SETTINGASIDE ABATEMENT - DEFECTIVE AS PER OFFICE REPORT] ON IA 101308/2017FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA38649/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 39086/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA41352/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 41355/2019

39 Crl.A. No. 2027/2010II-B

SURESH KUMAR @ SURESH ANDMAKKAN VIJAY KUMAR

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

40 C.A. No.3509-3510/2010IV

GURDIAL SINGH JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusJAGIR KAUR AND ORS. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI

41 C.A. No.4417-4418/2011XVI

THE LT.GOVERNER A AND ORS. G. INDIRA

VersusSHANTI RANI MISTRY . AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.33967-33968/2011XVI

GOKUL CHANDRA BAROI RAUF RAHIM

Versus

LT.GOVERNER ANDAMAN ANDNICHOBAR ISL . AND ORS. G. INDIRA

42 C.A. No. 10221/2010IV-A

THIPPERUDRAPPA ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusTHIPPAMMA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

43 C.A. No. 7775/2014XVI-A

JAMMU AND KASHMIR BOARD OFSCHOOL EDUCATION THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1]

VersusKRISHAN LAL GUPTA AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], M. SHOEB ALAM[R-2]

44 Crl.A. No. 40/2011II-B

GURCHARAN SINGH ANIS AHMED KHANVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

45 C.A. No. 187/2012XV

KASHILAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSAJJAN SINGH AND ANR. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]

46 Crl.A. No. 2312/2010II-C

MATHI @ MATHIAXHAGAN AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA, [P-2], [P-3], [P-5]VersusINSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Page 30: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 247 C.A. No. 2066/2012

XIIBALASUBRAMANIAM AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERVersusM.AROKIASAMY VIJAY KUMAR

48 C.A. No. 10827/2010IX

MANGALA WAMAN KARANDIKAR(D)TR.LRS. ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusPRAKASH DAMODAAR RANADE ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-1]

49 C.A. No. 4471/2010IV-A

K.M. KRISHNA REDDY BALAJI SRINIVASANVersusVINOD REDDY AND ANR. SHAKUN SHARMA

50 C.A. No. 5124/2013XV

SANTOSH KUMAR VISHWA PAL SINGHVersusASHOK CHAND AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN

51 Crl.A. No. 1734/2011II-C

CHINNAKANNU M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusSTATE REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OFPOLICE/ DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFPOLICE

M. YOGESH KANNA

52 C.A. No. 3599/2011IV-A

BASAVARAJ ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA IIVersusTHE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKAHOUSING BOARD, BANGALORE,KARNATAKA

SHAILESH MADIYAL

53 C.A. No. 259/2013IV

RANBIR SINGH RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1]VersusBALJEET SINGH AND ORS. PREETI SINGH[R-1]

54 Crl.A. No. 1418/2011II-B

NAHAR SINGH ANIS AHMED KHANVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH, JASPREET GOGIA[R-1], [R-1]

55 Crl.A. No. 2116/2010II-C

SUDESH VERMA T. MAHIPALVersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH) ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

56 C.A. No. 3281/2011III-A

M/S LAKSHMI SUGAR MILLS CO.LTD. SYED SHAHID HUSSAIN RIZVIVersusDHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

57 C.A. No. 8066/2011XII-A

K. UDAY KUMAR AND ANR. SHAKIL AHMED SYEDVersus

Y. VIJAYALAKSHMI . AND ORS. MANOJ C. MISHRA, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3], SUDHAGUPTA[CAVEAT]

58 Crl.A. No. 101/2013II-A

I.J.DEEWAN RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 100/2013II-A

JAGDISH NARAYAN HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 104/2013II-A

N.R.BAIDYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH, SAURABH MISHRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 103/2013II-A

RAM CHOUBEY (DEAD) BY LRS (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1], [P-1.5], [P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

Page 31: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2ConnectedCrl.A. No. 107/2013II-A

AJIT SINGH KUSHWAHA B. K. SATIJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

59 Crl.A. No. 325/2011II

LOK MAL @ LOKU DEVASA & CO.VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

60 Crl.A. No.1140-1141/2010II-C

ACHHAR SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1144/2010II-C

BUDHI SINGH SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

61 Crl.A. No.2187-2188/2011II-C

RAVEEN KUMAR M. C. DHINGRA[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

62 Crl.A. No. 544/2014II-C

MALLIKARJUN BASAPPA KOTI AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1], [P-2][PR]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

63 C.A. No. 149/2012III-A

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAVINDRA KUMAR

VersusGANGOTRI ENTERPRISES AND ANR. PRADEEP MISRA

64 C.A. No. 6483/2014XIV-A

NTPC LTD. PUNEET TANEJAVersusM/S. DECONAR SERVICES PVT. LTD. S. RAJAPPA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6484/2014XIV-A

NTPC LTD. PUNEET TANEJA

VersusM/S. DECONAR SERVICES PVT. LTD. S. RAJAPPA[CAVEAT]

65 C.A. No. 4943/2016XVI

GOVERDHAN DAS MIMANI AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusRAM KISHAN MIMANI AND ANR. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

66 C.A. No. 9342/2013III

CENTRAL WAREHOUSINGCORPORATION P. NARASIMHAN

VersusM/S FORTPOINT AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD A. V. RANGAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 9288/2013III

RAJENDRA SOPAN NANDGUDE SHOMILA BAKSHI

VersusATC TELECOM TOWER CORPN.PVT.LTD. VISHWA PAL SINGH

67 C.A. No.11015-11016/2017XII-A

VELAGACHARLA JAYARAM REDDY ANDORS. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[P-1]

Versus

M.VENKATA RAMANA & ORS.ETC.ANNAM D. N. RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-1], GAICHANGPOUGANGMEI[R-1]

68 C.A. No.11143-11144/2013IV

PUNJAB STATE INDUSL.DEVT.CORP. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

VersusVARUN MITTAL . AND ORS. RISHI MALHOTRA

Page 32: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

69 C.A. No.2826-2827/2016X

REMI METALS GUJARAT LTD. THROUGHITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SHIV KUMAR SURI

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS COMPANYSECRETARY

K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19203/2012X

O.N.G.C. LTD. THR. COMPANYSECRETARY K. R. SASIPRABHU

VersusREMI METALS GUJARAT LTD. THROUGHITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SHIV KUMAR SURI

70 C.A. No.6129-6131/2011IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusM/S. SRI BALA GOPAL CONSTRUCTIONLTD.. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

71 C.A. No.7924-7925/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP.LTD. MOHAN LAL SHARMA

VersusSATLUJ CONSTRUCTION LTD. TARUN GUPTA

72 C.A. No.3605-3606/2016IV-A

BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO.LTD. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusM/S ENG.PROJECTS(I)LTD.. AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

73 C.A. No. 5895/2016III-A

M/S. SHIV HARE BUILDERS MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERPROVINCIAL DIVISION AND ORS. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5896/2016III-A

M/S SHIV HARE BUILDERS MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]

Versus

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

74 C.A. No.2462-2463/2012IV-A

G.H.REDDY AND ASSOCIATESENGINEERING CONTRACTORS DUA ASSOCIATES

VersusTHE CHIEF ENGINEER KBJNL AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH

75 C.A. No.14659-14661/2015XVI

BHAGWANDAS AUTO FIN.LTD. ANDANR. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10669/2016XVI

SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. S. K. VERMA

VersusAMRIT JAL VENTURES PVT. LTD. JAY KISHOR SINGH

76 C.A. No.11018-11019/2017IV-A

M/S AHURA CONSTRUCTIONS TAYENJAM MOMO SINGH

VersusM/S KODAVA SAMAJA AND ANR. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 8157/2014III

MAHARASHTRA STATEELECT.TRANSM.CO.LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusM/S BALRAJE CONSTRUCTION RAUF RAHIM

78 C.A. No.2799-2804/2016III

SUBRATA ROY SAHARA . AND ORS. GAUTAM AWASTHI

Versus

Page 33: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2JET AIRWAYS(INDIA) CHAIRMAN ANDANR. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No.2805-2810/2016III

JET AIRWAYS INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. GAGRAT AND CO

Versus

SUBRATA ROY SAHARA AND ORS. RAJESH KUMAR, GAUTAM AWASTHI, E. C.AGRAWALA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2812-2817/2016III

JET AIRWAYS INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. GAGRAT AND CO

Versus

SUBRATA ROY SAHARA . AND ORS. GAUTAM AWASTHI, [R-1], , [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-7], RAJESH KUMAR[R-6]

79 C.A. No.5396-5397/2017XIV-A

ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERSLTD THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR DEVENDRA SINGH

VersusALCOVE INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. BRIJ BHUSHAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.5424-5425/2017XIV-A

ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERSLTD DEVENDRA SINGH

VersusALCOVE INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. BRIJ BHUSHAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5426/2017XIV-A

M/S.MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD S. JANANI

VersusTELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTSINDIA LTD SHANTANU KUMAR

80 C.A. No. 10341/2011XIV-A

UHL POWER COMPANY LTD. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHMULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS ANDPOWER DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10342/2011XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHMULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS ANDPOWER DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusUHL POWER COMPANY LTD. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 5677/2012IX

MONARCH ERECTORS PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI JAIRAJKALYANI

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusBHIWANI NIZAMPUR CITYMUNICIPAL.CORP. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

and IA No.54310/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.54311/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

82 C.A. No. 7776/2014IV-A

M/S. ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA)LTD. VINEET BHAGAT

VersusM/S. B.K. CONSTRUCTIONS (BKC) ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

83 C.A. No. 4344/2013XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURIVersusK.A. JOSE JOHN MATHEW

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34875/2014XIV

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SHANTANU KRISHNA

VersusM/S BHARDWAJ BROTHERS BANKEY BIHARI

Page 34: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

84 C.A. No. 2785/2012XVI

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusHINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. PAREKH & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2788/2012XVI

M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONCO.LTD. PAREKH & CO.

VersusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTH.OF INDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

85 C.A. No.2895-2896/2014III

MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEV.AUTHORITY THROUGH EXECUTIVEENGINEER SHRI SUDERSHANLAXMAIAH GUNDALA

E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNITY INFRAPROJECTS LTD. SHWETA GARG

ConnectedC.A. No. 2900/2014III

M/S UNITY INFRAPROJECTS LTD. SHWETA GARG

VersusMUMBAI METRO. REG. DEV. AUTH.,MUMBAI E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 2901/2014III

UNITY INFRAPROJECTS LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTOR SHWETA GARG

VersusMUMBAI METRO. REGION DEV. AUTH.,MUMBAI THROUGH EXECUTIVEENGINEER SHRI SUDERSHANLAXMAIAH GUNDALA

E. C. AGRAWALA

86 C.A. No. 8033/2014XII

GREAT OFFSHORE LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALAVersusCHENNAI PORT TRUST S. THANANJAYAN

87 C.A. No. 9667/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHIVersusM/S. VISHAL ENGINEERS ANDBUILDERS P. D. SHARMA

88 C.A. No. 3194/2014III

SAHAKARMAHARSHI BHAUSAHEBTHORAT SSK.LTD M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusTHYSSEN KRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIAP.LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

89 C.A. No. 11341/2014XVI

ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. TARUN GUPTAVersusB.H.E.L. TAYENJAM MOMO SINGH

90 C.A. No. 7009/2016III

BOMBAY CRIMPERS PVT.LTD.THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR P. V. DINESH

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR MANJEET CHAWLA

91 C.A. No. 8637/2013XIV-A

MMTC OF INDIA LTD. K. V. MOHANVersusINTERORE FERTICHEM RESOURCES SA

92 C.A. No. 8361/2014IV-A

MANOJ SHARMA MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

93 C.A. No.8261-8262/2012XVII

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusINDIAN BUILDERS JAMSHEDPUR MANOJ C. MISHRA[CAVEAT]

Page 35: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2

94 C.A. No. 8709/2017IV

M/S.SHIV SHANKAR RICE MILLSPVT.LTD. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

VersusPUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIESCORPN.LTD. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2017IV

M/S ADARSH RICE MILLS ABHAY KUMAR

VersusPUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUP. CORP. ANDANR. J S WAD AND CO

FOR ON IA 1/2016ConnectedC.A. No. 8711/2017IV

MAHALAKSHMI RICE MILLS DINKAR KALRA[P-1]

VersusPUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP.AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 56839/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 8712/2017IV

M/S. GURU TEK BAHADUR RICE ANDGENERAL MILLS RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

VersusPUNJAB STATE COOP. SUPPLY ANDMARKETING FEDERATION LTD.(MARKFED) AND ORS. DISTRICTMANAGER AND ORS.

VINEET BHAGAT[R-1]

95 C.A. No.8731-8733/2014III

M/S DLF UNIVERSALS LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA . AND ANR. PUJA SHARMA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.8734-8736/2014III

M/S. ATUL LLMITED PUJA SHARMA, [CAVEAT]

Versus

DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED ABHINAV MUKERJI

96 C.A. No. 14665/2015III

BHAVEN CONSTRUCTION THROUGHAUTHORISED SIGNATORY PREMJIBHAIK. SHAH

PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusEXE ENGINEER SARDAR SAROVARNA.NIGAM AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI

97 C.A. No. 10381/2017XIV-A

RITES LTDVersusM/S DIRECTOR, UP TECH.EDUCATIONAND ORS.

SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-1], DINESH KUMARGARG[R-3]

98 C.A. No. 5156/2017XIV-A

M/S METAL DISTRIBUTORS (UK) LTD. SUNIL FERNANDESVersusEMMSONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. . ANDANR. B. K. SATIJA

99 C.A. No. 10378/2017XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI(NORTH) PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusM/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10380/2017XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI(NORTH) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusM/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA YASH PAL DHINGRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 10379/2017XIV-A

NORTH DELHI MUNCIPALCORPORATION PRAVEEN SWARUP

Versus

Page 36: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 2M/S. HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA YASH PAL DHINGRA

100 C.A. No. 5938/2014XIV-A

M/S N. J. DEVANI BUILDERS PVT. LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusM/S. INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZERCOOPERATIVE LIMITED SHARMILA UPADHYAY

101 C.A. No. 11477/2014III

MAHINDRA AUTHORIZED SIGNATORYASSISTANT MANAGER LEGAL MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY

VersusMAHESHBHAI TINABHAI RATHOD ANDORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11478/2014III

MAHINDRA AUTHORIZED SIGNATORYASSISTANT MANAGER LEGAL MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY

VersusGOPALBHAI TINABHAI RATHOD

102 C.A. No. 2447/2014III

HINDUSTAN CONTRUCTION CO LTD. E. C. AGRAWALAVersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

103 C.A. No. 7743/2014XIV-A

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD. (HUDCO) S. S. RANA & CO.

VersusM/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES ANDINFRASTRUCTURE LTD. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI

104 C.A. No. 14658/2015XIV-A

MUSHI RAM ASSOCIATES AMBAR QAMARUDDINVersusUNION OF INDIA

105 C.A. No. 4035/2015IV-A

M/S ANRIYA PROJECT SERVICEMANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. KUMAR MIHIR[P-1]

VersusSRI.SRINIVASA MURTHY . AND ANR. NULI & NULI[R-1], MAHESH THAKUR[R-2]

106 C.A. No.8595-8596/2016XII

VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE REP. BYEXECUTIVE OFFICER, ETC. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.T. VENUGOPALAN AND ORS. ETC.AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, K. KRISHNA KUMAR

107 SLP(C) No. 4428/2016IX

S.M. PASHA AND ORS. BINDI GIRISH DAVE, ASHOK ANAND[P-4]Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.NIRNIMESH DUBE, CHIRAG M. SHROFF,GARIMA BAJAJ[R-4], KUNAL CHEEMA[R-5]SATYA MITRA[IMPL]SUMAN YADAV[INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.4922/2016IX

K.S. HARIHARAN AND ORS. V. D. KHANNA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

Versus

ARAM NAGAR TENANTS WELFAREASSOCIATION

GARIMA BAJAJ[R-1], CHIRAG M. SHROFF[R-2],KUNAL CHEEMA[R-16]

108 C.A. No. 21766/2017XIV-A

GAUHATI HIGH COURT THROUGH THEREGISTRAR GENERAL SNEHA KALITA

Versus

JUMUNA GOGOI PHUKAN AND ANR. NACHIKETA JOSHI[R-1], DEBOJITBORKAKATI[R-2]

109 C.A. No.9021-9022/2018XV

ASHOK KUMAR MEENA SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAHUL NARAYAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

Page 37: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:02:46

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 38: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 3HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

NOTE:-[ ON 08.09.2020 AND 10.09.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 5782/2008

IVINDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEYVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and IA No.96571/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSConnectedC.A. No. 5784/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96568/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 5785/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96579/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 7688/2009IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96574/2017

2 C.A. No. 13516/2015XII

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1][PR]Versus

P.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS. ANDORS.

VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][PR], [R-2.2], [R-2.1], [R-4.2],VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], [R-4.2], [R-4.2], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[R-6], [R-7]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }3 C.A. No. 4202/2010

IV-AM/S AGRO SOLVENT PRODUCTS(P) LTD. BRIJ BHUSHAN[P-1]VersusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }4 C.A. No. 1725/2010

IV-AIQBAL BASITH AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusN. SUBBALAKSHMI . AND ORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[R-1], [R-3]

5 C.A. No. 8651/2009XI-A

M/S TRAFALGAR HOUSECONSTRUCTION (T) SATYAMSHANKARANARAYANA (JV)

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

Versus

Page 39: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

6 C.A. No. 6589/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S HOTEL NANAKSONS PVT. LTD. GAURAV AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6586/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. AND ANR. ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S SHIVALIK RECLAMATIONS PVT.LTD. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1990/2009XVI

M/S BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. ANISHA UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusM/S EASTERN FOOD INDUSTRIESP.LTD. NAVIN PRAKASH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4066/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORP. LTD. AND ANR. ANISHA UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusM/S.NAV BHARAT LINK CHAINMFG.P.LTD AND ANR. MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

7 C.A. No. 6139/2013XII

M/S A.K. TRADERS AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]Versus

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]ZOHEB HOSSAIN[IMPL][PR]

8 C.A. No. 10186/2010XI-A

SHRI NABA KISHORE DAS AND ANR. SARLA CHANDRAVersus

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY, SHARMILAUPADHYAY, PAREKH & CO.

9 C.A. No. 922/2010IX

JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LD.,PUNE V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusM/S A.P.HEALTH CARE P.LTD. AND ORS.AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.383/2014 In C.A. No.922/2010IX

KAMAL KOTHARI SHEKHAR KUMAR

Versus

NITIN ASHOK PEDGAONKAR DIRECTORAND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA[R-1], [R-2]

10 C.A. No.7130-7133/2011XII

S.V.MATHAPRASAD P. VINAY KUMAR

VersusLALCHAND MENGHRAJ AND ORS ANDORS.

S. THANANJAYAN, SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY,A. T. M. SAMPATH

11 C.A. No. 3265/2016IV-A

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFTTAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S BPL LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2016IV-A

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX ANIL KATIYAR

12 C.A. No. 5844/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX(EXEMPTION) B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusRAUNAQ EDUCATION FOUNDATION RAJIV TYAGI

Page 40: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3

13 C.A. No. 7664/2009IV-A

KARNATAKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEAND INDUSTRY, HUBLI KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,HUBLI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1955/2015XI-A

M/S. TRAVANCORE EDUCATIONSOCIETY G. PRAKASH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

14 Crl.A. No. 60/2009II

MUNNA VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 61/2009II

CHANDRA PAL AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 2692/2010IV

GAMDOOR SINGH RANI CHHABRAVersusADDITIONAL STATE TRANSPORTCOMMISSIONER AND ANR. K. K. MOHAN, UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2693/2010IV

AVTAR SINGH SHALU SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERAND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], K. K. MOHAN[R-1]

16 C.A. No. 202/2012XI-A

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI, [P-2]VersusMOTHER SUPERIOR ADORATIONCONVENT M. P. VINOD

ConnectedC.A. No. 6589/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusREV. FATHER ANTO CHIRAPARAMBILReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedC.A. No. 10298/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMANAGING TRUSTEE, DIOCESANEDUCATIONAL TRUSTReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedC.A. No. 10297/2016XI-A

TAHSILDAR, VADAKARA TALUK, . ANDORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSREE GOKULAM EDUCATIONAL ANDMEDICAL TRUST PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

Ready as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.ConnectedC.A. No. 10881/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusDR. J. HAREENDRAN NAIRReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 31757/2016XI-A

QUILON MEDICAL TRUST RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI, [R-2]

Page 41: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 203/2012XI-A

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPROVINCIAL SUPERIOR JEEVANDHARA M. P. VINOD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 204/2012XI-A

ADMINISTRATOR,JOS GIRI HOSPITAL RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusGOVT.OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 207/2012XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusUNITY HOSPITAL(P) LTD. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 206/2012XI-A

THE TAHSILDAR (ASSESSINGAUTHORITY) (BUILDING TAX). ANDANR.

C. K. SASI

VersusT. T. THOMAS, PRESIDENT, EBENEZERINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION SAJITH. P

ConnectedC.A. No. 205/2012XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusADMINISTRATOR, SAN JOE COLLEGE OFNURSING HOSTEL T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 905/2012XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusADMINISTRATOR CHRISTURAJASCHOOL OF NURSING P. A. NOOR MUHAMED

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35112/2011XI-A

JUBILEE MISSION MED.COLL HIMINDER LAL[P-1]

VersusGOVT. OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.38498-38499/2012XI-A

ADMINISTRATOR,CHRISTU RAJHOSPITAL P. A. NOOR MUHAMED[P-1]

VersusGOVERNMENT OF KERALA REP. BYADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THEGOVERNMENT AND ANR.

NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5036/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW, C. K. SASI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusCARMAL PRAYER HOUSE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8351/2014XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusTHE OEM PUBLIC SCHOOL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 12235/2014XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY REP.BY DIRECTOR MEDICAL COLLEGEHOSPITAL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13874/2014XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusTHE MANAGER, MAR ATHANASIOSCOLLEGE JOSE ABRAHAM

Page 42: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 8352/2014XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusVIMALA HOSPITAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4445/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusJAMIYA SALAFIYYA EDUCATIONALASSOCIATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 4446/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4447/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusMUNDAKKAYAM MEDICAL TRUSTHOSPITAL M. P. VINOD

ConnectedC.A. No. 7368/2016XI-A

TAHSILDAR AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW, G. PRAKASH

VersusMOTHER SUPERIOR ST. JOSEPHCONVENT

17 C.A. No. 4686/2009IV

FOOD CORP.OF INDIA. AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEYVersusM/S PANNA LAL AND SONS R. NEDUMARAN[R-1]

18 C.A. No. 3127/2009XVI

UNIVERSAL PETRO CHEMICALS LTD. PARIJAT SINHAVersusB.P.PLC AND OTHERS KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3128/2009XVI

ARAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

VersusUNIVERSAL PETRO-CHEMICALS LD. KHAITAN & CO.

19 C.A. No. 13/2011XIV-A

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1]VersusM/S RADHA KRISHNA JALAN KAVITA JHA[R-1]

20 Crl.A. No. 442/2009II

RAMJI @ RAMJILAL ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

21 C.A. No. 7575/2009IV

MANJIT SINGH . AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]Versus

MANORATH SINGH KOHLI (D) THR. LRS. ANAND MISHRA[R-1][LR/S], AJITPUDUSSERY[R-1][LR/S]

22 Crl.A. No. 956/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]VersusNIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND ORS. C. L. SAHU[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 957/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusBHAG SINGH ALIAS BAGGA AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN[R-1][SCLSC]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4276/2009 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

Page 43: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedCrl.A. No. 959/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusANGREJO DEVI AND ORS. NIDHI[R-1][SCLSC]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 958/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDULA RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 761/2014II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDHARAM PAL AND ORS.FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1913/2014 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

23 Crl.A. No. 1052/2009II-B

KIRPAL SINGH JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE

24 C.A. No. 1361/2013III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S BHARAT UDYAG AND ORS. JATIN ZAVERI

25 Crl.A. No.1860-1861/2009II-A

MADAN MOHAN(DEAD) THR. LRS ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1], [P-1.4], [P-1.3],[P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1.6], [P-1.5]

VersusKAMAL KEDARNATH GANDHI AND ANR.

26 Crl.A. No. 1008/2009II-B

RAJ SINGH SATYENDRA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR, REKHA PANDEY[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1007/2009II-B

KAKA SINGH @ KULDIP SINGH SATYENDRA KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

27 C.A. No. 9618/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S. JANNHAVI INVESTMENTS PVT.LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9619/2010IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KALYANI EXPORTS ANDINVESTMENT PVT. LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

28 Crl.A. No. 745/2010II

DAYAMOY DEB SUDHA GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA[ FOR PHYSICAL HEARING INSTEAD OF VIDEO CONFERENCING MODE ]

29 C.A. No.7027-7028/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMANJU ARORA AND ANR. I. B GAUR

ConnectedC.A. No.7150-7151/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 44: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3

KANTA SURI AND ANR. PIYUSH SHARMA, SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[R-2]

30 C.A. No. 7952/2009XIV-A

EX. HAV. HANSRAJ SINGH (DEAD)THR.LR VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

31 C.A. No. 6629/2016XIV-A

LT. COMMANDER M.P. VERMA ALOK GUPTA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

32 Crl.A. No. 1600/2009II-B

THE STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusKULWANT SINGH AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

33 Crl.A. No. 626/2009II-C

SOMU @ SOMASUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusTHE STATE REP. BY DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

34 Crl.A. No. 660/2010II-C

JAITUN BEE GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANDORS.

SUMEER SODHI[R-1], AKSHATSHRIVASTAVA[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR]

35 Crl.A. No. 239/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusBAJRANG LAL AND ANR. YASH PAL DHINGRA, [R-2]

36 C.A. No. 5797/2009XIV-A

AMAR NATH K J JOHN AND CO[P-1]VersusGIAN CHAND AND ANR. DEVENDRA SINGH[R-1]

37 C.A. No. 5796/2009XII-A

BANDARU @ BELLAM VENKATRAMAIAH. AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI . Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOFOR ON IA 10/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2016 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 12/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5798/2009XII-A

B.RAMAMANI V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

38 C.A. No. 1089/2010XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATEINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LIMITED

BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusM/S. MANSON (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ANDORS. ANISHA UPADHYAY

39 Crl.A. No. 1076/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[P-1]VersusDEVILAL KUSHWAHA RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1072/2010II-A

S.H.O.

VersusJAGDISH GAUTAM RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1065/2010II-A

STATE OF M.P.

VersusPRAMOD KUMAR GAUTAM

Page 45: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 340 Crl.A. No. 1858/2009

II-BDHARAMBIR @ DHARMA RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

41 C.A. No. 5274/2010XIV-A

STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH ANDANR. ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusM/S M.R.POWER PROJECTS HRISHIKESH BARUAH

42 Crl.A. No. 837/2011II-B

THANKAPPAN @ KOCHUMANI P. VINAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KERALA C. K. SASI[R-1]

43 Crl.A. No. 2003/2010II

RAGOLU MANMADHA RAO RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

44 C.A. No. 1951/2011IX

HARISHCHANDRA MOTILAL JAIN(DEAD) THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES

KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]

VersusARUN GOVINDRAO SUTANE (DEAD)THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-2], PAVAN KUMAR[R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

45 C.A. No. 818/2011IV-A

MALLANNA NARENDRA KUMARVersusSMT. SARASWATI ANJANI KUMAR JHA

46 Crl.A. No. 2010/2010II-A

PRAKASH NAYI @ SEN AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF GOA

47 Crl.A. No. 1607/2009II-B

JAFAR T. N. SINGHVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

48 C.A. No. 2045/2011IV

DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR JASPREET GOGIAVersusPARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDERKAUR PANESAR@ AJINDER K PANESA MADHURIMA TATIA

49 C.A. No. 50/2010III

THE COMMISSIONER.OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWAPNIL FINANCE PVT.LTD. P. S. SUDHEERFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2010

50 C.A. No.9869-9871/2014III

BAPU NATHU BORATE M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusDADASO DINKARRAO JAGDALE T. HARISH KUMAR

51 C.A. No. 3767/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusARBIND JEE LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

52 Crl.A. No. 1844/2009II-C

SITARAM DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

53 C.A. No. 556/2012IX

SHRIPATI LAKHU MANE ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTHE MEMBER SECRETARYMAHARASHTRA WATER SUPPLY ANDSEWERAGE BOARD AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI

Page 46: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 354 Crl.A. No. 2043/2009

II-APRAHALAD B. K. SATIJA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 983/2010II-A

MOHAN SHARMILA UPADHYAY[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]B. SUNITA RAO[IMPL]

IA No.18308/2018-impleading party55 C.A. No. 3035/2010

IV-AAJAY KASHYAP RAJESHVersusHEMLATA KASHYAP NIRAJ SHARMA

56 C.A. No. 5719/2009XII-A

PRATAPA (JAYANTHI) PADMAJA JOHN MATHEW[P-1]VersusJAYANTHI SURYA CHANDRA SHEKAR TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1]

57 Crl.A. No. 1066/2010II-A

RAM SHARAN CHATURVEDI S. JANANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

58 C.A. No.6964-6965/2015XIV-A

SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusC.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6966-6967/2015XIV-A

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus

C.I.T. NEW DELHI. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6969-6970/2015XIV-A

C.I.T., DELHI-92 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S AIR FRANCE VINAY GARG

ConnectedC.A. No. 6968/2015XIV-A

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6972/2015XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,N.DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6973/2015XIV-A

C.I.T-XVII,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 12449-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 08 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SRL RANBAXY LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58304/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

59 Crl.A. No. 754/2010II

SUBHAJOY TRIPURA . AND ANR. B. SUNITA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]

Page 47: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 360 C.A. No. 10077/2010

XVILOPAMUDRA DASGUPTA SANDEEP NARAINVersusDIPANKAR DASGUPTA RANJAN MUKHERJEE

61 Crl.A. No.2157-2159/2013II

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusSURAJ NIDHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2160/2013II

MUNNU SYED MEHDI IMAM[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF PAROLE ON IA 86878/2019

62 Crl.A. No. 2286/2010II-B

JASBIR SINGH RAJIV MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

63 C.A. No. 9334/2010III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusRAM BAHADUR YADAV YASH PAL DHINGRA

64 C.A. No. 4387/2010XIV-A

R.P.SINGH CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIVersus

M/S. DHIMAN RICE MILLS AND ORS.BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-1], NARESH K.SHARMA[R-2]ASTHA SHARMA[IMPL]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1223/2019 in C.A. No.4387/2010XIV-A

PURAN CHAND JUNEJA AND ANR. ASTHA SHARMA

Versus

R.P. SINGH

IN C.A. No. - 4387/2010, FOR ADMISSION65 Crl.A. No. 1472/2010

II-CAMIR HAMZA ANSARI AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

66 Crl.A. No. 1388/2010II

ALLURI SRINIVASA RAO Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1389/2010II

JANGAM KUMAR SWAMY Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

67 Crl.A. No. 513/2011II

ANIL HALDAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH[P-1]Versus

MONINDER SINGH PANDHER AND ORS.MADHU MOOLCHANDANI[R-1], SARVESHSINGH BAGHEL[R-3], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-4]

68 C.A. No. 6310/2010IV

M/S. SONALIKA AGRO INDUSTRIESCORP. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusM/S. LOTIA AUTO INDUSTRY S. S. SHROFF

69 Crl.A. No. 1855/2011II

ANIL KUMAR JAIL PETITION[P-1], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]

70 Crl.A. No. 1181/2010II

KUDUMULA VENKATAIAH SANGEETA KUMAR[P-1]Versus

Page 48: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1]

71 C.A. No. 6240/2011III-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEFSECURITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusJAIBEER SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

72 C.A. No. 3532/2011XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusNIHAL AHMAD KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED

73 Crl.A. No. 1926/2010II-C

KRISHNARAJ V. G. PRAGASAMVersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 468/2013II-C

KATHIRESAN SAMIAR K. RAJEEV

VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PANRUTISUB DIVISOIN

M. YOGESH KANNA

74 Crl.A. No. 1452/2011II-C

KAPIL SATNAMI E. R. SUMATHY[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 3514/2011 AND PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON I.A. NO. 10437/2015

75 Crl.A. No. 569/2013II-A

RAMESHWAR RAM AND ANR. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHYVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

76 Crl.A. No. 190/2011II-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]VersusM.S.MANDER RAM NARESH YADAV[R-1]

77 Crl.A. No. 1044/2011II-B

BASTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]

78 Crl.A. No. 1908/2011II-A

SHIVRAJ SINGH NILOFAR KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

79 C.A. No. 279/2016III

MAHARASHTRA STATE FIN.CORPN. PRAMIT SAXENAVersusDILIP KUMAR G. BADLANI . AND ORS. R. N. KESWANI

80 Crl.A. No. 441/2011II-B

CHAKKIARTH DASAN AND ORS. ANKIT ANANDRAJ SHAH[P-1], [P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, [R-1]

81 Crl.A. No.1205-1208/2011II-C

MOOSA @ TADA MOOSA @ MOOSAMOHIDEEN AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12],[P-13], [P-14]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE AD.S.P.SITCBCID M. YOGESH KANNA

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 23617/2012 FOR [PERMISSIONTO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 23742/2012 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ONIA 23746/2012 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 26927/2012 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 26923/2012 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ONIA 21909/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 761/2015 FORGRANT OF BAIL ON IA 17723/2016

Page 49: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2789-2792/2012II-C

S.VEZHAVENDAN AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

Versus

BASITH @ MOHAMED BASITH AND ORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-5], A. VENAYAGAMBALAN, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20],[R-21], [R-22], [R-23]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.766-768/2012II-C

S.VEZHAVENDAN AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

Versus

ASHARAF AND ORS.M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-3], G. BALAJI, [R-2],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

FOR ON IA 1989/2012 FOR ON IA 1992/2012ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 765/2012II-C

A.THAJUDDIN MD. SHAHID ANWAR

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADUFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1985/2012

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2227-2228/2011II-C

OZIR @ ABDUL OZIR @ TADA OZIR ANDANR. S. GOWTHAMAN, [P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU CBCID REP.BY TH AD.S.P. SIT

82 Crl.A. No. 566/2012II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusKISHAN LAL . AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-3], [R-4]

83 C.A. No. 812/2011XVII

ARUN KHOSLA M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]VersusGURUCHARAN SINGH

84 Crl.A. No.1298-1299/2011II-B

GURMUKH SINGH @ BINDA AND ORS. GOPAL PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

85 C.A. No.1663-1664/2012XI-A

M/S. MANJOO AND COMPANYREPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR M. P. VINOD

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KANNUR ANIL KATIYAR

86 C.A. No. 2888/2012XI-A

A.J. MICHAELVersusBEXY MICHAEL A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

87 C.A. No. 5828/2019XI-A

KONNAPALAM KANDI P.K.V.CHOYICHI(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. RANJITH K. C.[P-1]

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVAL, RENJITH. B, K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No. 5829/2019XI-A

KINARULLA PARAMBATH UPPENNUAND ORS. K. RAJEEV

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVALFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 123898/2019 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 123900/2019

88 Crl.A. No. 1797/2011II-A

SRIPATI ADARSH UPADHYAY[P-1]Versus

Page 50: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

89 C.A. No. 2784/2012XVI

LALTI DEVI T. MAHIPALVersusSURESH KUMAR LAL SHEKHAR KUMAR

90 C.A. No.6886-6887/2011XVII

MANISH KUMAR RAI VINEET BHAGAT

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

91 Crl.A. No. 1651/2012II-A

KAMADEO MAHARA T. MAHIPAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NOW THE STATEOF JHARKHAND ABHISHEK[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 2331/2015II-A

DUKHI MAHARA AND ANR. JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD[R-1]MS. DEEP MALA IS APPEARING AS AMICUS CURIAE

92 Crl.A. No. 2010/2011II-A

BHAGWAT CHAITRAM TALTE K. RAJEEV[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

93 C.A. No. 5166/2012III-A

STATE OF U. P. THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT THR.ITS SECRETARY/MANTRI AND ANR. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1]

94 C.A. No. 2606/2012XIV-A

EX.CT. MAHADEV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[P-1]VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDERSECURITY FORCE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

95 Crl.A. No. 720/2012II-C

JITENDER KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

96 Crl.A. No. 1402/2014II-C

ROOPLAL VERMA JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 20585/2012 THE NAME OF MR. JEETENDRA SINGH,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

97 C.A. No. 5103/2012IV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusMEENAKSHI AMMA ENDOWMENTTRUST E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5923/2012IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. D.P.R. CHARITABLE TRUSTTHROUGH ITS MANAGER KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5468/2013IV-A

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTION AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BANGALORE ORTHOPAEDICSOCIETY K. V. MOHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 2979/2016IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BHOPAL ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 51: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3SEWA DRISHTI SAMITI

ConnectedC.A. No.5418-5419/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S MANIPAL ALUMNI OFNEPHROLOGY TRUST

ConnectedC.A. No. 6057/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), MANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKSHATRIYA GHANCHI SAMAJSANGHATANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9794/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKESHAV RASTROTHAN SAMITI

ConnectedC.A. No. 17337/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDR. GEETA GUPTA CHARITABLE TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2251/2018IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHRI SHIRDI SAI DARBAR CHARITABLETRUST (DHARAMSHALA) JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8142/2019XI

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSRI SAI DARBAR TRUSTFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.50968/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 11775-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUND KUND SHIKSHAN KENDRATRUST

ConnectedC.A. No. 4996/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PRAGATHI SOCIAL WELFARETRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28194/2018XI

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARATI SAMAJ KANPUR U.P. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8063/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAYATHRI NITHYA VIDYA TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19233/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAYATHRI NITHYA VIDYA TRUST

ConnectedC.A. No. 7139/2018III-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBABU RAM EDUCATION SOCIETY

Page 52: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20519/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21980/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) JAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD JANPATH TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26111/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTION JAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWAMI SHREE 108 SHREE MURLIRAMMAHARAJ SADHU PANCHAYAT TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29258/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4840/2019XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHEKHWATI PUBLIC SCHOOL SAMITILOSAL TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8761/2019IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PARTAP EDUCATION ANDRESEARCH SOCIETY A. KARTHIK[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46137/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1277/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29290/2019XV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29276/2019XV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29291/2019XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

98 Crl.A. No. 1635/2013II

G.SUDHAKAR NAIDU M. VIJAYA BHASKARVersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. D. MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1634/2013II

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

VersusMOTUPALLE VENUGOPAL NAIDU GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

99 Crl.A. No. 1614/2014II-C

TAMESHWAR PATEL RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHANTH PATIL[R-1][GR]

Page 53: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3100 C.A. No. 8773/2012

XIV-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]VersusCAMRUS ZAMAN GHAFOOR PARIAT (D)THR.LRS RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1]

101 Crl.A. No. 392/2012II-B

VINUBHAI SHANABHAI VANKAR TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 586-593/2012XIV-A

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSHINE SATELITE PUBLIC COMPANYLTD THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8913/2012XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 796/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC CO. LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 915/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORP. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 1282/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINTELSAT CORPORATION BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 922/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSTAT CORPORATION H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27679/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24054/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27680/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4142/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 169/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7735/2014XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 54: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3THAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8353/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SHIN SATELLITE PUBLIC LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10300/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II, NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SHIN SATELITE PUBLIC CO. LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 107/2020XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.194264/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.194265/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURINGTHE DEFECTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 9354/2019XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORPORATIONIA No.182321/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

103 C.A. No. 1189/2015III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]VersusURMILA KOHLI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ALOK SHUKLA[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1]As per Hon'ble Court Order dated 29.05.2019, List the appeal after summervacation before the appropriate Bench.

104 C.A. No. 8000/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEEVersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8301/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEE

VersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

105 C.A. No. 7408/2012XII

R.VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANIVersus

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[CAVEAT], PRABHASWAMI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.10876-10878/2013XII

R. VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANI

Versus

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURTMADRAS AND OR SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, B. BALAJI

106 Crl.A. No. 976/2012II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusRAIS @ BEHRA AND ANR.please show the name of mr. pradeep kumar Adv. (AC) Non A.O.R. in the causelist.

107 C.A. No.8151-8181/2013XII-A

GOVT.OF A.P.& ORS.ETC.ETC. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

Versus

GOVT.OF A.P..ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

LAWYER S KNIT & CO[CAVEAT],VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, NAVINPRAKASH, G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, G.MADHAVI, E. R. SUMATHY, D. BHARATHIREDDY[CAVEAT], C. S. N. MOHAN RAO, BIJOYKUMAR JAIN, A. V. RANGAM[CAVEAT]

Page 55: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3and IA No.107111/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.8314-8315/2013XII-A

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INST.OF TECHYAND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, [CAVEAT]

Versus

STATE OF A.P. . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 154/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE GOPAL SINGH, G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 155/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUCATIONALSOCIETY AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE G. N. REDDY, HARISH PANDEY[R-5]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 567/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTT. OFTECH. AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 547/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUC.SOCITY .AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

108 C.A. No. 2986/2012XIV-A

CONST. AMAR SINGH RAJ SINGH RANA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

109 Crl.A. No. 1398/2012II-C

P. RAMA RAO LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusTHE STATE (THROUGH CBI) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1399/2012II-C

RUNU GHOSH ANIL NAG[P-1]

VersusC.B.I MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1400/2012II-C

SUKH RAM AJIT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]IA FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 30997/2018

110 Crl.A. No. 1310/2012II-A

SURESH MENDE NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

111 C.A. No. 9105/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICALSINDUSTRIES LIMITED. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8755/2017III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBANK OF INDIA JAY KISHOR SINGH

Page 56: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 9107/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CHEIL COMMUNICATIONS INDIAPVT LTD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9109/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DOUBLE DOT FINANCE LTD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9110/2017XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWARNA ADHARA IJMII INTEGRATEDTOWNSHIP DEV. PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9112/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusVISISTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9113/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. (NOWBHARTI AIRTEL LTD.) KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9887/2018III

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT)-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BLACK VEATCH PRICHARD, INC. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

112 Crl.A. No. 1008/2012II-B

SHAILESH @ MUKESH RADKABHAIKOLI PATEL RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

113 C.A. No. 8545/2015XII-A

DURGAM ANITHA AND ANR. T. V. RATNAMVersusSTATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM, ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-2]

114 C.A. No. 5673/2012XVII

HARMEET SINGH BALRAJ DEWANVersusP.K. BHARDWAJ ALIAS SHRIPUSHPENDER KUMAR

115 Crl.A. No. 1645/2012II-A

NANABHAU MALHARI KOTKAR MANJU SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

116 C.A. No.3418-3420/2017III

MANISH SONI AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAMINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

117 C.A. No. 1277/2016XIV-A

C.I.T-II ANIL KATIYARVersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 9185/2019XIV-A

THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.171541/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

Page 57: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedDiary No. 44662-2018XIV

COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.177902/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 169/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.177532/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 5973/2019XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC CO LTDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.104631/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.104633/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28186/2016XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1380/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF I.T-II (INTERNATIONAL TAXN) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 1381/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 1386/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 11198/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161165/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29612/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152234/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 10845/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151404/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1383/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX II(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

Page 58: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 9962/2014XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-II,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. THROUGHMANAGING DIRECTOR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1385/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF I.T.-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 8018/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B. V. KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 11197/2018XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161574/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2005/2020XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. INTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28709/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2431/2020XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION

118 C.A. No. 2413/2016IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL ANDINFRASTRUCTURE DEV. CORPN. ANDANR.

SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusM/S. LOS ANGELES FOOD PROCESSINGLTD. AND ANR. ANUP KUMAR

119 Crl.A. No. 1245/2013II

DAYA SHANKAR ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

120 C.A. No. 1656/2015IV-A

NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD.. ANDORS. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD. S. C. BIRLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1658/2015IV-A

SUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS SUSHEE INFRAPRIVATE LIMITE)

S. C. BIRLA

VersusNORTHERN COAL FIELDS LTD.. ANDORS. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

121 C.A. No.3761-3762/2017XIV-A

DHARAM SINGH VAID KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM.A.BHARTI (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

122 Crl.A. No.598-600/2013II

AJAI ALIAS AJJU AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]

Page 59: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2014II

MUKESH JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPlease show the name of Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati,Advocaste Amicus Curiae in thecause list on behalf of the Appellant in Jail Petition.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.745-748/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]

VersusAJAI @AJJU RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]ready

123 Crl.A. No. 282/2016II

JAGADAMBA PRASAD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 283/2016II

GAJRAJ @ HAJJI AND ANR. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

124 Crl.A. No. 1401/2012II

SUBED ALI TAYENJAM MOMO SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY DEBOJIT BORKAKATI

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } I.A NO. 70819/2020 GRANT OF BAIL TO BELISTED

125 Crl.A. No. 152/2013II-C

TOFAN SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUMANISH VASHISHTHA[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-1]NIKHIL JAIN[INT], AVADH BIHARIKAUSHIK[INT], ANZU. K. VARKEY[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ROHINTONFALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE NAVIN SINHA AND HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ. [TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 836/2011II-B

KIRAN KUMAR PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER C. K. SASI{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 827/2010II-B

BAGICHA SINGH KANCHAN KAUR DHODI

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2214/2009II-B

ANWARBEG AMIRBEG MIRZA@ANWARAZIZ MIRZA NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 835/2011II-B

GURARSHAN SINGH RATTAN ABHISHEK SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-1],C. K. SASI[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }ConnectedCrl.A. No. 77/2015II-B

BHERU SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

Page 60: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 344/2013II-B

AFZAL HAROON BATATAWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 6338/2015II-B

RAM NIWAS K. SARADA DEVI[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 91/2017II-B

BALWINDER KUMAR RANJAN KUMAR[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]

VersusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUCHANDIGARH ANIL KATIYAR, [R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }ConnectedCrl.A. No. 90/2017II-B

SAJI MOHAN VARGHESE SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1]

VersusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,CHANDIGARH B. V. BALARAM DAS, [R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ONIA 116275/2018

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1202/2017II-A

ASLAM PATHAN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } list the I.A no. 47718/218 application forBail only before the Hon'ble Court.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1750/2009II-B

FAROOQ RASULBHAI KURESHI SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } ONLY CRIMINAL APPPEAL NO. 1751/2009ARISING OUT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1750-1751 OF 2009 QUA APPELLANTMUNAVARALI AHMEDALI SAIYED HAS BEEN DISMISSED VIDE HON'BLECOURT'S ORDER DATED 11.05.2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1826/2013II-C

PREM @ KANNAN @ SUDESHWARAN K. PAARI VENDHAN[P-1]

VersusSTATE BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER B. KRISHNA PRASAD{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 433/2014II-C

BADRI LAL SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU B. KRISHNA PRASAD{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 }

126 C.A. No. 9720/2014IV-A

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

127 Crl.A. No. 1679/2012II

RAM KALP CHAUDHARY V. MAHESHWARI & CO.VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1]

Page 61: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3128 C.A. No.

3312-3314/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES P.LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No.3315-3317/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

129 Crl.A. No. 170/2014II-A

UMANAND MEHTA DIPAK KUMAR JENA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

130 Crl.A. No. 699/2013II

GODE YESU R. V. KAMESHWARANVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

131 Crl.A. No. 1866/2013II-B

LAKHWINDER SINGH AMITA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. RITESH KHATRI, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2197/2014II-B

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Versus

SURJIT SINGH . AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR ISSUE OF BAILABLE WARRANT OF ARREST ON IA 10811/2013 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 10812/2013

132 C.A. No. 2830/2016XVI

BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD MEERA MATHURVersusC.I.T. KOLKATA-IV AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24548/2016XI-A

KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIESCORPORATION LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32361/2015XI-A

M/S. MERCHEM LIMITED MALANKARACENTRE, M.G. ROAD KOCHI-682035 RADHA RANGASWAMY

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 159/2019III

DHRUVI PHARMA PVT. LTD., THROUGHITS DIRECTOR MOHIT D. RAM

VersusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(OSD)

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1358/2019XI-A

M/S POPULAR VEHICLES ANDSERVICES PVT. LTD. RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.185472/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3250/2019III

MAX VIGIL SECURITIES PVT. LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.11547/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.11549/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.11548/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

Page 62: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 2831/2016III

GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPN. NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II,AHMEDBAD ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2832/2016III

M/S.JMC PROJECTS (I) LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusC.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2833/2016III

CHECKMATE SERVICES P LTD AARTHI RAJAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17739/2019III

ASK ME LAB CON SERVICES PVT. LTD. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(4) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23295/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23388/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25483/2019XI-A

KERALA STATE WAREHOUSINGCORPORATION JUDY JAMES

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4241/2020III

MAX VIGIL SECURITY PVT. LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.ConnectedSLP(C) No.4971-4973/2020XI-A

HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD. RADHA SHYAM JENA

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

133 Crl.A. No. 576/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusUDAY SINGH JAIN

134 C.A. No. 9829/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusSATYASAI MINES AND MINERALS LTD. .AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9677/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTDAND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusM/S MAA VAISHNNAVI SPONGE LTDAND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE

Page 63: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 9830/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusM/S ADITYA SPONGE AND POWER (P)LTD. . AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

135 Crl.A. No. 1923/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusKUNTHI BAI AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-1]

136 Crl.A. No. 721/2014II

VIRENDRA GUPTA ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA

137 Crl.A. No. 160/2014II

KRISHNA KANT CHATURVEDI SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SRISHTI SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7756/2017 ONLY IA 7756/2017 TO BE LISTED.

138 C.A. No. 981/2014III-A

NOORUL SUBAH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDANR. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

VersusVIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA MANJU JETLEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 3828/2014III-A

BRIJNANDAN (D) THR. LRS. S. K. VERMA

VersusZIAUL HAQ THROUGH MUTUWALINUKUL SHUBAH (D) THR. LRS. ANDANR.

JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

139 Crl.A. No. 392/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusRAGHVENDRA VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1]

140 Crl.A. No. 1645/2013II-C

SANJAY PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]VersusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

141 Crl.A. No. 2016/2013II

MEKALA SIVAIAH RAVINDRA S. GARIAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

142 C.A. No. 8731/2017IV-A

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[P-1][GR]VersusM/S S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. THR. DIRECTOR LIZ MATHEW[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8732/2017IV-A

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SHRI NIWASA CONST.COMP.ENG. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]AS FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 3/2016

143 Crl.A. No. 808/2014II

RAJESHWAR VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1]

144 Crl.A. No. 957/2014II

RAM KARAN ANKIT GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

145 C.A. No. 4071/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusPSA SICAL TERMINALS LTD THROUGHITS DIRECTOR NARESH KUMAR

Page 64: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3146 C.A. No. 7910/2015

XII-ASALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTAVersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7911/2015XII-A

SALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

147 Crl.A. No. 149/2015II

KRISHNA PAL @ KRESH PAL ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1], GP. CAPT. KARANSINGH BHATI[R-2]

148 Crl.A. No. 596/2014II

RAGHAV PRASAD AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

149 C.A. No. 11287/2013XVII

K.S. SAHU DEEPAK GOELVersus

UOI . AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

and IA No.1402/2018-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION150 C.A. No. 618/2015

XIV-AR.S.AZAD RANA RANJIT SINGHVersusM/S.MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 619/2015XIV-A

HARPAL SINGH RANA RANJIT SINGH

VersusM/S MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

151 C.A. No. 3800/2017XIV-A

ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

152 C.A. No.5962-5963/2014XIV-A

BANSAL COMMODITIES AND ORS. SUBODH S. PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

153 C.A. No.1134-1135/2016XVI-A

SNEH LATA SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[P-1]

Versus

RATNO DEVI AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

154 C.A. No.4374-4375/2016XI-A

KIRAN KUMAR PARIDA RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

VersusPRAVEENA SAMAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1]

155 C.A. No.9506-9507/2017IV

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE UNIONHOME SECRETARY, MINISTRY OFHOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA NORTHBLOCK AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1][GR], [R-4][GR],KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-2][GR], [R-3][GR]

APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION AND APPLICATION FOR SEEKING LISTING DUETO EXTREME URGENCY

156 C.A. No. 10503/2014XII-A

MATTAPALLI LAXMI NARASIMHAINDUSTRIES SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIALCORPORATION AND ANR.

Y. PRABHAKARA RAO, VENKATESWARA RAOANUMOLU

Page 65: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3157 C.A. No. 2851/2015

IIIISMAILBHAI I. KANSARA(D) TH. LR RAUF RAHIM[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT, THROUGH THECHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR.

NIKHIL GOEL[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

158 C.A. No. 11128/2016XIV-A

C.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11129/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11131/2016XIV-A

CIT, DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI HEXACOM LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11148/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11134/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11130/2016XIV-A

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11132/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11136/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11133/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11135/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI CELLULAR LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11137/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11146/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTIINFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

Page 66: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 11141/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11139/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 11143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 11145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 163/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 11147/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 162/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 11149/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. THROUG ITSDIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1564/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10524/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD THROUGH ITSM.D. E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4839/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3/2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17501/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[CAVEAT]

Page 67: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 10529/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16367/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD MAHUA KALRAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.81021/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 6897/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELEMEDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89542/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4394/2019XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S S.T. ERICSSON INDIA PVT LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18782/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 4178-2019IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMBA RESEARCH INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33118/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 5703-2019IV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NXP SEMI CONDUCTORS INDIAPVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.34814/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20863/2019XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24740/2019XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26256/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LIMITEDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.160823/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

159 C.A. No.9831-9832/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusEX. CORPORAL PRAVEEN KUMARMISHRA RABIN MAJUMDER

160 C.A. No. 9526/2017XII-A

LINGALA SATHYANARAYANA DEAD BYLR. VINOD KUMAR TEWARI

VersusKOYYADA ANDALU ANNAM D. N. RAO[CAVEAT]

Page 68: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3161 Crl.A. No. 1551/2014

IISTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusBABU LAL AND ORS.

162 C.A. No. 4287/2017IV

AJAY MAHAJAN @ AJAY GUPTA S. N. BHATVersusNAJAR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIKI.A. No. 37654/2018 is disposed of by Hon'ble Court's order dated 14.01.2019. Onlyappeal is to be listed.

163 Crl.A. No. 590/2017II

MUJAMMIL AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHAKEEL AHMED[COMP], VISHWA PALSINGH[R-1]

164 Crl.A. No. 736/2017II

KOVELAMUDI SEETHARAMAIAH K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1]Versus

S V S RAVI KRISHNA AND ORS.G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], TATINIBASU[R-2], [R-3], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

165 C.A. No. 5525/2016XVI

BINA BASAK AND ORS DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusSRI BIPUL KANTI BASAK AND ORS ABHISHEK SINGH[R-1]

166 C.A. No.2665-2666/2016XII-A

BOYAPATI SRINIVASA APPA RAO ANDANR. SRIDHAR POTARAJU

Versus

V KAMESWARA RAO AND ORS. SURESHAN P., SHEKHAR KUMAR, K. SHIVRAJCHOUDHURI[R-5]

167 SLP(C) No. 2851/2015IV-A

ANUROG MODI PYOLI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS.

SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]168 C.A. No. 10527/2017

XII-AM/S GULF OIL CORPORATION LTD. A. SUBBA RAOVersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

169 C.A. No. 3503/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMOODYS ANALYTICS KNOWLEDGESERVICE RESEARCH (MAURITIUS)LIMITED

BHARGAVA V. DESAI

170 C.A. No. 11268/2016XVI

STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OFINDIA LTD. MOHINDER JIT SINGH

VersusINDUSIND BANK LTD. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.[CAVEAT]

171 C.A. No.3022-3023/2019XII

LAKSHMI P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusKASIAMMAL (D) THROUGH LRS.N.SURIYA DEEPAN S. RAJAPPA

172 C.A. No. 11806/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]VersusKANTA MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11807/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]

VersusEINO S. MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

Page 69: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3

173 C.A. No.14970-14971/2017XVI-A

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE KATRA ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

ASHWANI KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[R-1], SAKSHIKAKKAR[R-1]

174 C.A. No. 3672/2017XIV-A

SANJEEV KUMAR RAMPAL AND ORS. FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], DEEPAKGOEL[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], NEERAJSHEKHAR[R-7], [R-8]

175 C.A. No. 4390/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7328/2016XII-A

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL LABOUR COURTCOMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG VENKATA LAKSHMI A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 10452/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 1512/2018XII-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG. SANJAY CHOWDHARY A. SUBBA RAO

176 C.A. No. 7326/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 1 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANSAL LANDMARK TOWNSHIP (P) LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1], K. V.MOHAN[R-1][IMPL]

FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30250/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT]ON IA 30251/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30253/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 7998/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CAPARO INDIA LTD. PUNEET SINGHBINDRA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8005/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NOIDA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGYPARTK LTD.IA No.152673/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.152675/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 214-216/2020XI-A

THOMAS MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM , KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 217-218/2020XI-A

THOMAS GEORGE MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

Page 70: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 219-221/2020XI-A

THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 222-223/2020XI-A

M/S. HAMEED & CO. ENGINEERS PVT.LTD. PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 224/2020XI-A

THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

177 Crl.A. No.1742-1743/2017II

INDRAJIT MALLAH KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SPECIAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESHFOR ON IA 16298-99/2016-Application for juvenilety

178 C.A. No. 6419/2017III

SANJAY KUMAR RAI G. BALAJIVersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOMEAFFAIRS THE SECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

179 C.A. No. 4585/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersus

PROBIR GHOSH AND ORS.

DIKSHA RAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-11], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],[R-26]D. BHARATHI REDDY[IMPL]

ONLY IA 134690/19 TO BE LISTED.4/802 MM DTD, 05.03.2020ConnectedC.A. No.4586-4587/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

BITUPAN RABA AVIJIT ROY[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 134331/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No.30408-30409/2019XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

VINOD BHANDKOLIYAFOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA191684/2019

180 C.A. No. 6838/2017XVII

EX. JWO VISHNU DEO TIWARI TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

FOR ON IA 1/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON ON IA2/2017

181 C.A. No. 13120/2017XVII

RAVINDER CHNANA AND ORS. PRAVEEN JAIN, DEVVRAT[P-2]Versus

Page 71: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3

DELHI SECRETARIAT AND ORS.

D. N. GOBURDHAN[R-5], AVIJIT ROY[R-6],GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-7], PREMPRAKASH[CAVEAT], [R-9], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-10], PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-2],YOGINDER HANDOO[R-3]SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } List the matter in the first week of Feb,2020

182 C.A. No. 10258/2017III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusYASH PAL SINGH AND ORS. GORKELA LAW OFFICE[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2018III-A

U. P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDAND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA

VersusSHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA AND ORS. HIMANSHU BHUSHAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.25680-25681/2018XI

SHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA HIMANSHU BHUSHAN

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

183 Crl.A. No. 1394/2017II

GOVERDHAN PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

184 C.A. No. 21769/2017III

MAHARASHTRA HEAVY VEHICLES ANDINTERSTATE CONTAINER OPERATORSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN[CAVEAT], P. N.PURI[R-1]

185 Crl.A. No.1964-1968/2017II-A

RAM VILAS PASWAN JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], PRANABPRAKASH[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], HARSHPARASHAR[R-6]

186 C.A. No. 1614/2018XII-A

ANDHRA BANK THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED OFFICER AMAN GUPTA

VersusK. V. KRISHNA REDDY ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1615/2018XII-A

NALLAMILLI BHEEMESWARA REDDY ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusK.V. KRISHNA REDDY AND ORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT], [R-1]

187 Crl.A. No. 244/2018II-A

BALAJI GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 669/2018II-A

HANMANT GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[INT]FOR FOR [I/A FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS] ON IA89011/2018 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION ON IA17675/2019

Page 72: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 3

188 Crl.A. No. 326/2019II-B

ANRABHAI @ ANDU DEVLABHAIRATHAVA KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

189 C.A. No. 1485/2019III-A

SUMITRA DEVI S. R. SETIAVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. ARUN AGGARWAL[R-2], K. K. MOHAN[R-4]

190 C.A. No. 2702/2019III

MAHESH C MATHUR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR[P-1]VersusROHINTON ERUCH SHROFF AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

191 C.A. No. 98/2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.2934-2935/2019XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

RAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD

ConnectedDiary No. 13648-2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA69181/2019 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 69182/2019

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:08:07

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 73: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 4HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

NOTE:-[ ON 08.09.2020 & 10.09.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 5356/2007

XVII-AV.K. VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHADVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SHALU SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 157/2017XVII-A

IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECOMPANY LTD. AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH

VersusM/S. NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKIKAISHA NYK LINE (NIPPON YUSENKAISHA) . AND ORS.

ASHOK MATHUR[R-2], AAKARSH KAMRA[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3390/2019XVII-A

CHAITALI BHATTACHARJEE ABHISHEK ATREY

VersusSOMNATH BISWAL AND ORS. HIREN DASAN[CAVEAT], SOUMYA DUTTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6108/2018XVII-A

SHREE SHARDA CHAINS PVT. LTD. VISHAL PRASAD

VersusPARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD.IA No.67084/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.67085/2018-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 5795/2018XVII-A

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERALINSURANCE COMPANY LTD. GAGAN GUPTA

VersusVA TECH WABAG LIMITED MANAGINGDIRECTOR J S WAD AND CO[R-1], [R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.66231/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.66229/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 3350/2018XVII-A

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON(FORMERLY THE BANK OF NEW YORK) AKSHAT GOEL

VersusMETCO EXPORT INTERNATIONAL ANDORS. TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1], P. I. JOSE[R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.ConnectedC.A. No. 5355/2007XVII-A

PREM VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK M. T. GEORGE, SHALU SHARMA, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5354/2007XVII-A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S. DIWAKAR GOIRAM PORKHAYAT NIKHIL GOEL

Page 74: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No.5352-5353/2007XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AMIT KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

HARSOLIA MOTORS AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, , SANTOSH KUMAR -I[INT], M. J. PAUL[INT]

FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2006 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2015 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 2821/2012XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AMIT KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

M/S ANKUR . AND ANR. RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPINGUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. D 31862/2015XVII-A

SH. SATISH MAHESHWARI PROPRIETOR AWANISH SINHA

VersusM/S MSC AGENCY (INDIA) PVT. LTD.AND ANR.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2016 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1039/2020XVII-A

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECOMPANY LIMITED GOPAL SINGH

VersusM/S OPG ENERGY (P) LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

2 C.A. No. 585/2010XII-A

JANAKI BAI (D) TH.LRS. NAR HARI SINGHVersusRAGHUNATH PERSHAD (D) BY LRS. .AND ORS. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT, PRAMIT SAXENA

and IA No.104267/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.26371/2018-BRINGING ON RECORD and IA No.26372/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 586/2010XII-A

JANAKI BAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAR HARI SINGH

VersusRAGHUNATH PERSHAD (D) BY LRS. .AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL, PRAMIT SAXENA

and IA No.104374/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.16/2010 In C.A. No.585/2010XII-A

MANGLA DEVI AND ORS. PRAMIT SAXENA

Versus

RAVINDER LAL . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, VENKATESWARA RAOANUMOLU, NAR HARI SINGH

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.17/2010 In C.A. No.585/2010XII-A

MAGLA DEVI AND ORS. NAR HARI SINGH

Versus

M/S VENUS DEVELOPERS . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

3 C.A. No. 244/2007IV

M/S. ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAIVersus

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR.ANIL KATIYARMUSHTAQ AHMAD, [INT], GAGRAT AND CO,[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 351/2007IV

M/S. PUNJAB TRACTORS LTD. RAJIV TYAGI[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

Page 75: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4

ConnectedC.A. No. 3208/2007IV

M/S RICO AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.4804-4807/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD. KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4051/2007IV

M/S. VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4045/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4046/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4047/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4121/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICLAS LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4049/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4122/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4043/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4044/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5629/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX-I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5001/2008XVII

M/S VEE GEE INDUSTRIESENTERPRISES THRU ITS CHIEFOPERATING OFFICER

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3270/2009IV-B

M/S.VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD KAVITA JHA

Versus

Page 76: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANDORS AND ORS.

4 Crl.A. No. 989/2007II-A

DEVI LAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1]

5 C.A. No. 6100/2008IV

RAM PIARA (D) BY LRS. B. SUNITA RAOVersusSHAM LAL S. JANANI

6 C.A. No. 7289/2009XVII-A

C.M.D.,CITY UNION BANK LIMITED .AND ANR. K. K. MANI

VersusR.CHANDRAMOHAN KRISHAN KUMAR

7 C.A. No. 10232/2010XII-A

M/S SUBEDAR SAHEB CHOULTRYTRUST BOARD P. N. RAMALINGAM

Versus

CHINTALA UDYA SHANKAR AND ORS. G. MADHAVI, [R-2], RAKESH K. SHARMA,ARUNA GUPTA[R-1], [R-3]

and IA No.97825/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ConnectedC.A. No.10234-10243/2010XII-A

BODAPATI PADMAVATI AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAM

Versus

CHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR . AND ORS. G. MADHAVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10233/2010XII-A

THE SECRETARY RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusCHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAMand IA No.133191/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

8 C.A. No. 289/2011III-A

SHAMBHU SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[P-1]Versus

SHANKER RAI AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], MANOJK. MISHRA[R-5]

9 C.A. No. 10364/2010XII

R. KRISHNADHAD MANI SATYA MITRA GARG[P-1]Versus

S.R. BHOOPETHY DHASAN . AND ORS. VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], S. THANANJAYAN[R-1],VINODH KANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

10 C.A. No.6502-6503/2009X

CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT..AND ANR. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusGOVIND PRASAD KEDIYAL T. MAHIPAL

11 C.A. No. 2834/2010XII

A.V.SURESHBABU AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHYVersusP.PERUMAL . AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY, V. G. PRAGASAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2842/2010XII

S.KARTHIKEYAN AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusR.CHELLAPPA AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY

12 C.A. No. 1114/2009IV-A

MAHADEV MALLAPPA HULLYAGOL RAJESH MAHALE[P-1]VersusSATIGOUDA YALAGOUDA PATIL (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-1.9], [R-1.1], [R-1.8],[R-1.7], [R-1.6], [R-1.5], [R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2]

list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per RP dated 15.11.201913 C.A. No. 4679/2007

XI-AE.C.CHERIYAN ROMY CHACKOVersusC.RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR. G. PRAKASH

Page 77: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4

14 C.A. No. 353/2008XVII-A

M/S DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIAPVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN[P-1]

VersusM/S CONTROLS AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY, NIRANJANA SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.19536-19537/2017XVII-A

MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PRIVATELIMITED AND ANR. SIDHARTH SETHI

VersusCG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD AND ORS. P. S. SUDHEER[R-1]

IA No.115716/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.115713/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.115711/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No./- and IANo.118473/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 2633/2018XVII-A

M/S. CG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusMERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD. ANDORS. SIDHARTH SETHI[CAVEAT]

IA No.17088/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.17089/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30173/2018XVII-A

M/S EASY ELEVATORS INDIA PVT LTD RAKESH KUMAR

VersusM/S NISSAN MOTORS INDIA PVT LTDAND ANR. MANJULA GUPTA[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 8935/2011XII

THANGAM AND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]VersusNAVAMANI AMMAL SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH[R-1][PR]

16 C.A. No. 5260/2010XII-A

ARSHA VIJNANA TRUST SRIDHAR POTARAJUVersusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXESREP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

17 C.A. No. 2794/2010XV

GOPAL LAL SHOBHA GUPTAVersusGOKUL NARAIN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, H. S. PARIHAR

18 C.A. No. 1497/2008IV

JHABBAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[P-1]VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1498/2008IV

BALAK RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, S. JANANI

19 C.A. No. 1400/2013XIV-A

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-IV,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DAEWOO MOTORS INDIA LTD.

20 C.A. No. 1113/2013XII

J.PARASMUL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. KUNAL CHATTERJI

Versus

J.NAVAL KISHORE M. A. CHINNASAMY, PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR

21 C.A. No. 8090/2011XVI

NUNU MANDAL AND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASADVersusKRISHNA CHANDRA JHA . AND ORS. JITENDRA KUMAR, JOHN MATHEWFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 2/2009 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 3/2009

Page 78: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 422 C.A. No. 2435/2010

XII-AMOTURU NALINI KANTH Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD DEVASA & CO.

23 C.A. No.2461-2462/2011XV

BASANT KISHORE (D) AND ANR.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1.4], [P-1.3],[P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.2], [P-2.1], [P-2],[P-2.3]

VersusRAJESHWAR PRASAD S. L. ANEJA

24 C.A. No. 6576/2008XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DHARAMPAL PREM CHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

25 C.A. No. 363/2009XIV-A

M/S YAMU INDUSTRIES LTD. S. RAJAPPAVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

26 C.A. No.6326-6329/2011XII-A

ORGANTI BALARAM . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, T. MAHIPAL, S. K.VERMA, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, MANUSHANKER MISHRA, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8]

(Application for vacating stay)I.A.../2012 (Application for permission to filemodification)I.A.../2012 (Application for modification)

ConnectedC.A. No. 6340/2011XII-A

GANGULA NARASIMHA AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. REP. BY ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA, ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA,VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 122659/2018 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 122665/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.6330-6339/2011XII-A

O. NARASIMHA . AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-9],[R-11], [R-13], [R-15], [R-17], [R-19]

FOR ON IA 1-10/2008 FOR [IANO. 11-12/2009 (APPLICATION FORIMPLEADMENT)] ON IA 39113/2009 FOR ON IA 41-50/2016

27 C.A. No. 431/2010IV-A

RAM KRISHNA ASHRAM AND ORS. NIRMAL CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

SHASHWAT PANDEY . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-8],ATUL KUMAR[R-10], RUPESH KUMAR[R-11]

28 C.A. No.4534-4535/2009XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMAD

VersusSAWAMI VISHOKA NAND BHARTI ANDANR. MADHUSMITA BORA

29 C.A. No. 2768/2009IV

M/S.STEEL STRIPS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[P-1]VersusM/S. O.P. STEEL TRADERS AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

30 C.A. No. 507/2011III-A

INDIAN VETERINARY RESEARCHINSTITUTE (IVRI) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

Versus

Page 79: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], M. P.SHORAWALA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

31 C.A. No. 2640/2009IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD VISHWA PAL SINGH

VersusM/S PARAMOUNT SCIENTIFIC WORKS KAMALDEEP GULATI

32 C.A. No. 827/2011XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersus

UMA KANT AND ORS. VISHNU SHARMA, SUNIL KUMAR VERMA, K.V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

33 C.A. No. 9-12/2011XV

RAJDADIJI SMT. BADAN KANWARMEDICAL TRUST PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][P-RES]

34 C.A. No. 7218/2010III

CIT,AHMEDABAD B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S NIRMA CHEMICAL WORK LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER

35 Crl.A. No. 1441/2009II

CHAD SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHY, MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

36 C.A. No. 6893/2008XVII-A

SHRUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELFAREASSOCIATION GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

Versus

SRI RAM HOUSING FINANCE ANDINVESTMENT AND ORS.

GOPAL PRASAD[R-1], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-5],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-6], BHAKTI VARDHANSINGH[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6894/2008XVII-A

TRIVENI K.S.A.SAMITI LTD. GOPAL PRASAD

VersusSURUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELF.ASSN..AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD

37 C.A. No. 5311/2010XII

M/S SHAW WALLACE GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1], E. R. SUMATHY[R-2]

38 C.A. No. 4784/2009XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusC.RAJAMMA AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAMIA No.91490/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION FILED BY MR. ZULFIKER ALIP.S., ADVOCATE.

39 C.A. No. 5863/2011XI-A

SUNIL KUMAR DASS(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.Versus

REV. DIV. COMMNR.,CENTRAL DIV., .AND ORS.

SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY, UTTARABABBAR, RAJESH SRIVASTAVA, SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5864/2011XI-A

PRABIR ROY CHOWDHURY(DEAD) THR.LRS. UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]

VersusTHE REVENUE DIVISIONCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL DIVISIONAND ORS.

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY[R-1], SIBOSANKAR MISHRA[R-1], RAJESHSRIVASTAVA[R-1]

40 C.A. No. 10306/2016XVI

SHANKAR PRASAD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTAVersusRAMANUJ PRASAD(D) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [R-3]

Page 80: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 441 C.A. No. 8967/2012

III-ADEVI PRASAD NAVIN PRAKASH[P-1]VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD (D) THR. LRS..AND ORS.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1.1.6],[R-1.1.5], [R-1.1.4], [R-1.1.3], [R-1.1.2], [R-1.1.1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8970/2012III-A

GIRI (D) TH. LRS. AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE

VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, NAVINPRAKASH[R-16]

42 C.A. No.7008-7009/2011XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusP.V.JAYASANKER . AND ORS.

43 C.A. No. 3047/2010XVII-A

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING RACHANA JOSHI ISSARVersusGURCHARAN SINGH GILL AND ANR.and IA No.102846/2017-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS ANDGROUNDS

44 C.A. No. 2024/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONERTANJOREMUNICIPALITY R. V. KAMESHWARAN

VersusB.GUNASEKARAN AND ORS. AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

45 C.A. No. 5877/2009IV-A

T.BALAKRISHNAM NAIDU (D) BY L.RS. DEVASA & CO., [P-1], [P-3], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[P-2]

VersusR. MUNIRAJU AND ANR. S. N. BHAT, [R-1], SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

46 C.A. No. 7219/2009IX

THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING MINISTRYOF URBAN AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusUDAY JAMBAWALIKAR ABHA R. SHARMAIA No.20232/2018

47 C.A. No.3291-3294/2009XV

THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedDiary No. 45834-2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER, KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 15825/2019 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA15827/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 15829/2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24841/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA151225/2019

ConnectedDiary No. 4078-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIAIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 26889/2018 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 26892/2018

Page 81: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedDiary No. 4085-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURMANAGERIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33950/2018 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA33951/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 33953/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8968/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA (EARLIER STATEBANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR)FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA36656/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 25465-2018IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER KAVITA JHA[R-1], [R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 97018/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA97019/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28657/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.175771/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.175773/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.175772/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 1045-2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDCB BANK LTD.IA No.11736/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.11737/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4843/2020IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusICICI BANK LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.22204/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.22205/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

48 Crl.A. No. 1201/2010II-B

NAND KISHORE @ BALLI . AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, RISHI MALHOTRA,CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1210/2010II-B

SANJAY @ PAPU BINAY KUMAR DAS

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

49 Crl.A. No. 431/2009II-B

BIKKAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE, [R-1]

50 Crl.A. No.586-589/2009II-C

S.MADHU B. S. BANTHIA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 82: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4FOR ON IA 90855/2008

51 Crl.A. No. 1298/2009II-C

P.C.SRIVASTAVA VISHNU SHARMAVersusLALIT MADHAN KUSUM CHAUDHARY

52 Crl.A. No. 1319/2010II-C

SEKAR(DEAD) VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THEINSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

53 C.A. No. 4973/2011III-A

PARVATI DEVI SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], RAKESHUTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SATISH KUMAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4975/2011III-A

NON-FORMALEDU.INSTR.SUPERV.WEL.ASSO. SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SHAIL KUMAR DWIVEDI[I-1][IMPL],RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, [I-2][IMPL],ALOK SHUKLA[I-3][IMPL]

FOR FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SY] ON IA3/2012 FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. ALOK SHUKLA] ON IA5/2013 FOR ON IA 6/2013 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 2/2011 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 8/2016 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 9/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATIONON IA 10/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 11/2017 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 12/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 13/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 14/2017 FORimpleading party ON IA 40592/2017 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA40592/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2011III-A

PANKAJ DUBEY AND ORS.DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10],[P-11], [P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15]

Versus

REKHA AND ORS.P. I. JOSE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-15], [R-13], [R-14],[R-16], [R-17]

54 C.A. No. 6937/2008XVII-A

S.K.JAIN TEJAS PATEL[P-1]VersusKAMLESH GUPTA . AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR[R-1]

55 Crl.A. No. 135/2009II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGHVersus

SURINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDHIR MENDIRATTA, ARVIND GUPTA[R-1],[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

56 C.A. No.10201-10202/2010XI-A

M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCELTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCOCHIN

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]A. RAGHUNATH[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4903/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCH.AND LES. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

Page 83: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 4907/2014XI-A

M/S VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASEP.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4906/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURC. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4905/2014XI-A

M/S.MULAMOOTTIL LEASING E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX A. N. ARORA, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4904/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCO.P.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10204/2010XI-A

ART LEASING LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10203/2010XI-A

M/S.KERALA STATE FINANCIALENTERPRISES LTD. V. K. MONGA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHRISSUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.10205-10206/2010XI-A

M/S BELL LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE (P) LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10207/2010XI-A

M/S RIGHT LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE CO. P. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4441/2011XI-A

M/S ROYAL HIRE PURCHASE(P) LTD. A. RAGHUNATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6388/2013XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-ICHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTVS FINANCE AND SERVICES LTD. RADHA RANGASWAMY

57 Crl.A. No. 2300/2009II-A

BALARAM AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

58 Crl.A. No. 1055/2010II-C

S. SHANKAR @ SHIVASHANKAR RAJEEV SINGHVersusH.B. PRAKASHMUMAR JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.

59 Crl.A. No. 1631/2008II-B

MADAN LAL SHARMA SANJAY JAINVersusPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Page 84: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4

60 C.A. No.6915-6916/2008IX

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD) BYLRS. K. N. RAI, ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSAYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDARETC.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4116/2012IX

SAYYED SAJIT HUSSAINI (DEAD)THROUGH LRS SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.6311-6312/2013III

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD)THROUGH ITS TRUSTEES ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDAR &ORS.

J. P. DHANDA[R-1], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

61 C.A. No. 8694/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMANGLAM RICINUS LTD. GEETANJALI MOHAN[R-1]

62 Crl.A. No. 1725/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1726/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

63 Crl.A. No. 804/2011II-B

RAM PARTAP NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 1956/2011III

C.I.T,AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYARVersusASHOK SHANTILAL SHAH MANISHA T. KARIA

65 Crl.A. No.2247-2248/2009II-C

HARSHA ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

66 C.A. No. 6746/2012XI-A

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ANDORS. AJIT PUDUSSERY

Versus

G.S.RAJU AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN, P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH,BINA MADHAVAN

67 C.A. No. 7899/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RESEARCHSOC. . AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIFOR ON IA 26062/2009 FOR DISPENSING WITH SERVICE OF NOTICE ON IA1/2009

ConnectedC.A. No. 7900/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RES.SOCIETY .AND ANR. PAREKH & CO., CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA

68 C.A. No. 5070/2011XII

THE MANAGEMENT OF CHEMPLASTSANMAR LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

Versus

Page 85: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4A. ROBERT

69 C.A. No. 9994/2011III-A

U.P.PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHRISH KUMAR MISRA[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ANKIT GOEL[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9995/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH SECRETARY ANKUR PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-6]

70 C.A. No. 6377/2009XVII-A

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA J S WAD AND COVersusMANBAI NANJI BHUDIA

71 Crl.A. No. 1564/2009II-A

MANJIT SINGH KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND MUKTI CHAUDHRY[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 288/2013II-C

SURINDER GROVER KUSUM CHAUDHARY

VersusSTATE OF(NCT OF DELHI) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

72 C.A. No.5465-5468/2011XVII-A

M/S. INCON ENGINEERS LIMITED ANDANR. NIRAJ GUPTA

VersusSHRI M.A.MUNVARASEEM . AND ORS.

73 C.A. No. 1720/2010XII

N.CHELLAPPA GURUKKAL S. GOWTHAMAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYSDEPARTMENT AND ORS. REP. BY CHIEFENGINEER

T. HARISH KUMAR, VINODH KANNA B.[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], P. SOMA SUNDARAM, B. BALAJI

74 C.A. No.1858-1859/2016XII

NAGABHUSHANAMMAL (D) THRU LRS VIJAY KUMAR

VersusC.CHANDIKESWARALINGAM K. K. MOHAN

75 C.A. No. 5241/2009XVII-A

JAI SHREE MINE PRODUCTS P.LTD. RAJIV MEHTAVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.. ANDANR. MANJEET CHAWLA

76 Crl.A. No. 840/2009II-C

M.K.MALBOOL KHAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 8347/2009XVII-A

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER

VersusSUPREME SECURITIES SERVICES LTD.

78 C.A. No. 6353/2012XII

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusASST.PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ANR. BRAJESH KUMAR[R-1][PR]

79 C.A. No. 4461/2010XVII-A

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, H.U.D.A. . ANDANR. NARESH BAKSHI

VersusCAPT. A.C.MOHAN GEETANJALI MOHAN

80 C.A. No. 4070/2009XVII-A

M/S.PREMIER TRANSPORT LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersus

Page 86: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4NEW INDIA ASSURANCECO.LTD..THROUGH ITS REGIONALMANAGER AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL, AJAY CHOUDHARY

81 C.A. No. 5726/2009XVII-A

M/S KIRAN OVERSEAS EXPORTS LTD.VersusTHAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[R-1]

82 C.A. No. 5081/2011XV

COMMR.KVS AND ORS. S. RAJAPPAVersusSURENDRA KUMAR VINEET BHAGAT

ConnectedDiary No. 28290-2017XV

SURENDRA KUMAR MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYASANGATHAN AND ORS.IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 92642/2017

83 C.A. No. 7575/2011XVII-A

HARYANA URBAN DEVT. AUTH0RITYETC. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusARJUN SINGH SENGER B. K. SATIJA

84 C.A. No. 2518/2012XIV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusP. ZADENGA DEEPAK GOEL[R-1]

85 C.A. No. 7693/2009XVII-A

MUKHTIAR KAUR CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULIVersusL.I.C.OF INDIA . AND ANR. INDRA SAWHNEY

86 C.A. No. 8154/2009XVII-A

REGISTRAR, KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY ANKUR S. KULKARNIVersusSIRIN H MAKANDAR ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2009

87 C.A. No. 5426/2010IV-A

CHANNABASAPPA GAVISIDDAPPAMATTUR AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE

VersusHANUMAPPA NAREGALLAPPA MATTURAND ORS. S. N. BHAT, SHANKAR DIVATE, ANIL KUMAR

88 C.A. No. 2178/2011XIV-A

MD.ABDUL RAHIM AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEEVersusMANAGEMENT OF CACHAR PAPERMILL SHEKHAR KUMAR

89 C.A. No. 7166/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATESVersusTAJBIR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7191/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusRAJINDER SINGH . AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7199/2010IV

MOHD. FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusMANSA RAM R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7168/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusBALDEVA (D) THR LRS . R. C. KAUSHIK

Page 87: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 490 C.A. No.

1120-1121/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusKARAM CHAND AND ORS. ANIL NAG[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

91 C.A. No. 2825/2010XVII-A

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusMAL SINGH

92 C.A. No. 88/2012XII

THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusDEPUTY CHIEF INSPECTOR OFFACTORIES AND ANR. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

93 C.A. No. 3589/2010IV

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusPARDUMAN SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI, [R-1]ORIGINAL RECORD IN THE MATTER RECEIVED.

94 C.A. No.2463-2464/2011III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusBRINDABAN . AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRAs per order dated 15.02.2019 passed in I.A. No. 40272/2018 in C.A. No. 2468/2011

ConnectedC.A. No. 2468/2011III-A

BRINDABAN TR.B.M.SANGH ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusM/S HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD..AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA

95 Crl.A. No.1384-1385/2009II-A

RANVIR SINGH . AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 700/2011II-A

SARDAR SINGH SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]and FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 55313/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 55315/2017

96 C.A. No. 24/2013III

BHARTIBEN CHANDRAKANTBHAITHAKOR NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

97 C.A. No.3913-3931/2011XI-A

A.GIJI PAUL AND ANR ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS ETCNISHE RAJEN SHONKER, SUMITA HAZARIKA,M. T. GEORGE, G. PRAKASH, A. VENAYAGAMBALAN

I.A. NOS. 1-19 OF 2010 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION98 Crl.A. No. 524/2010

II-AGULAM WAHID AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSEOFFICER

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

99 Crl.A. No. 1868/2009II

SRI ASHISH BHUTANI AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]

Page 88: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1869/2009II

SRI PREETOM SAIKIA K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1867/2009II

GUNA TAMULY PHUKAN KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

VersusDR. ASHISH BHUTANI . AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]FOR EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING ON IA 16760/2009

100 C.A. No. 8516/2011IX

UCO BANK AND ORS. RAJESH SINGHVersusM.B.MOTWANI (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

101 Crl.A. No. 396/2010II-B

PHULEL SINGH T. L. GARGVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

102 C.A. No. 7227/2010XII

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERARTHANAREESWARAR TEMPLE M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]

VersusR.SATHYAMOORTHY AND ORS ANDORS.

SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1],VINODH KANNA B.[R-21]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7228/2010XII

THE COMMISSIONER HINDURELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLEENDOWMENTS

VINODH KANNA B.[P-1]

VersusR SATHYAMOORTHY ANDORS AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10475/2010XII

K.M. ELANGOVAN . AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

R. RUKMANI . AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-14]

ONLY IA NO FOR RECTIFICATION OF COURTS ORDER TO BE LISTED IN CA NO10475/10 FOR [Appl. seeking rectification of order dt. 3.12.2010] ON IA115218/2014

103 C.A. No. 1870/2010XII

NACHIMUTHU MUDALIAR DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusG. V. ANANTHAPADMANABHAN ANDORS. AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

104 C.A. No. 2187/2011IV-A

MOHAMMED KHALEEL (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS.

SUKANT VIKRAM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusJAYAMMA P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 9261/2014III-A

SHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]Versus

U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THR.ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-4], SATPALSINGH[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

106 C.A. No. 5688/2012XII-A

K.JAYASEKHAR D. BHARATHI REDDY[P-1]VersusSECY. TO GOVT.AGRL AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1], [R-2]

107 C.A. No. 5038/2012IX

RAM @ RAMDAS SHESHRAO NEHARKAR ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA IIVersusSHESHRAO BABURAO NEHARKAR . ANDORS.

Page 89: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4108 C.A. No.

3370-3371/2012XII

G.SHANMUGAM (D) BY LRS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.HR & CE (ADMN) DEPT.. ANDORS. R. N. KESWANI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-1]

109 C.A. No.9030-9031/2014XII

A.PARVATHY MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusBHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY AND ANR. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

110 C.A. No. 7395/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRAVersus

M/S. TARA CHAND SHAM LAL AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7396/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. PURAN CHAND ASHWANI KUMARAND ORS.

K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7403/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S HANSRAJ TARSEM CHAND ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7405/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BADRI DASS CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7404/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S NEW PUNJAB TRADERS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7411/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BADRI PARSHAD BANARASI DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7413/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusJAI DURGA TRADING COMPANY ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7416/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S KESHO RAM AND BROTHERS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7412/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA TRADING COMPANY . ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7415/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SHAM LAL AND SONS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

Page 90: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 7400/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S ATMA RAM CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7398/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. SATDEV HARIRAM AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7407/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S JAI JAGDAMBE RICE MILLS K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7408/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S AMBAY RICE MILLS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7399/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BABU RAM CHARNJIT AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7397/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. RAMA FOODS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7409/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA RICE MILLS AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7410/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SEHAJ RAM RAM KISHAN DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7401/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S GARG TRADING CO. AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SATPAL RAJKUMAR INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7402/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD CHANDIGARHAND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S RAVINDERJEET SINGH RAJINDERKUMAR AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedDiary No. 8741-2019IV-B

PUNJAB STATE AGRICULTURALMARKETING BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BANSAL RICE FACTORY AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.52678/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.52682/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

111 Crl.A. No. 789/2011II-C

AMAR (MINOR) THR.LEGALGUARD.MOTHER AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

VersusCHATURBHUJ MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ

Page 91: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4

112 C.A. No. 283/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (BASIC)AND ORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

SMT. SUSHILA SRIVASTAVA . AND ORS. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1], [R-2], [R-8],[INT], [IMPL], JITENDRA KUMAR[R-9]

113 Crl.A. No. 1730/2015II-C

PARDESHI RAM SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF M.P.(NOW CHHATTISGARH) SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

114 C.A. No. 10345/2011XI-A

M/S.ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN. LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusRADHESHYAM BARIK (DEAD) AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10344/2011XI-A

M/S. ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN.LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusAKRURA DHURUA . AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

115 C.A. No. 78/2018XII

SONITHA KALLAT E. M. S. ANAMVersus

RAJARAM KALLAT AND ORS AND ORS.M. P. VINOD, [R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], JAMES P.THOMAS[R-12][PR]

116 C.A. No. 3102/2016IV

HARDEEP SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

117 Crl.A. No. 1676/2011II

MAHBOOB AND ORS. S. S. NEHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)AND ANR.

JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1], SANJAYKUMAR DUBEY[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 784/2013II

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusAKBAR . AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI, SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 783/2013II

MANSAB SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY[P-1][PR]

Versus

AKBAR SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], NARESHBAKSHI[R-1], JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1]

118 C.A. No. 8624/2014XII

KASTHURI AND ANR. AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusS.M. SIVASWAMI AND ORS. AND ORS. T. HARISH KUMAR

119 C.A. No. 8329/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusINDIAN NAVY CIVILIAN DESIGNOFFICERS ASSOCIATION THROUGHSHRI SWAPAN DEB AND ANR.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

IA No.3 (D.no.20220/12) to be listed along with Main matter120 C.A. No. 6793/2013

III-AALLAHABAD BANK AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]VersusSECRETARY ALLAHABAD BANK TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN, [R-1]

121 Crl.A. No. 1264/2011II-C

DHASIM @ MOHAMMAD DHASIM A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Page 92: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 4853/2016II-C

SYED ALI AND ANR. ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

FOR FOR ON IA 112952/2017122 C.A. No. 471/2016

XI-AN.K. SASIDHARAN . AND ANR. G. PRAKASHVersusM/S. NELLIAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.921/2017 In SLP(C) No.13460/2016XI-A

NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS ANDORS. USHA NANDINI. V

Versus

L. CHANDRASEKHARAN G. PRAKASH[R-3]and IA No.28211/2018-I.A. FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE andIA No.28212/2018-I.A FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13460/2016XI-A

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTSAND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusNELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS USHA NANDINI. VFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2017 FOR [IA FOR VACATINGTHE INTERIM ORDER] ON IA 36978/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA 42831/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 42833/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 472/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusM/S NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V, RENJITH. B

FOR ON IA 6/2016123 C.A. No. 7661/2011

XII-ADG CSIR AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusD. ATCHUTA RAO KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

124 C.A. No. 5517/2012IV-A

SYNDICATE BANK RAJIV NANDAVersusB GANESH PAI MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJAT THE TOP OF THE HEARING MATTERS.

125 C.A. No. 7236/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusVINAYAK SHANKAR CHATURVEDI S. C. BIRLA[R-1]

126 Crl.A. No. 1288/2012II-C

RAVISHANKAR @ SHISHUPAL JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VMZ CHAMBERS[R-1][GR]Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. is appointed as AC for the petitioner

127 C.A. No. 1944/2015III

MOHAN AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDE[P-1]Versus

KALYAN AND ORS.SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE[R-3], [R-4], ANISH R.SHAH[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-6], [R-8], [R-9],[R-10]

128 Crl.A. No. 748/2012II-C

STATE OF KARNATAKA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusB.T.RAMESH RAJESH MAHALE

129 Crl.A. No. 460/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]Versus

Page 93: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4JANVED SINGH ANIL SHRIVASTAV

130 C.A. No. 9746/2011XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS.PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], UMANG SHANKAR[R-4]SANDEEP JINDAL[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9747/2011XIV-A

ANURAG SHARMA AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[P-1], RAMJEE PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-2], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

131 Crl.A. No. 124/2015II-A

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusBHAGWAN PRASAD GAURAV AGRAWAL

132 C.A. No. 7546/2012XVII-A

ASHUTOSH SANJAY KUMAR TYAGIVersusRAJPUT GUN SERVICE(FAC)REVA SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL

133 C.A. No. 9696/2011XVII-A

CHAIRMAN KISAN SAHKARI CHINIMILLS LTD. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusPOST MASTER GENERAL BAREILLY .AND ORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

134 C.A. No. 10853/2014XVII

KAMLA GANGOLI PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEPARTMENT OF URBANDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BUILDINGTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

MUKTI CHAUDHRY[R-1], GOPAL PRASAD[R-4]

135 C.A. No.6827-6828/2014IV

RAKESH KUMAR CHOPRA SANTOSH MISHRA

Versus

NARINDER KUMAR . AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA, JYOTI MENDIRATTA, GAURAVDHINGRA, (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

136 Crl.A. No. 245/2013II

KANAHAIYA SHILPA SINGHVersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (NOWUTTARAKHAND) SAURABH TRIVEDI

137 C.A. No. 10317/2011XVII-A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. PRAMIT SAXENA[P-1]VersusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2025/2012XVII-A

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP.LTD. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

VersusUNITED INDIA INS.CO.LTD.

138 Crl.A. No. 1795/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]Versus

SAU GITA AND ORS. GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-4], ANAGHA S.DESAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

139 C.A. No.11389-11392/2011XII

S.ASOKAN G. BALAJI

VersusE.DHARMAN ETC.ETC. ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYINTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 127847 OF 2017- APPLICATION FORDIRECTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 18.2.2016

Page 94: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4140 C.A. No. 4612/2013

III-ASTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]VersusSURESH PAL SINGH R. C. KAUSHIK[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29491/2012XI

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAI PRAKASH (DEAD) THR. LRS. @ JAIPRAKASH KHANNA

141 C.A. No. 804-806/2013XIV-A

MR. KEZHOLEL RHETSO JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS. N. ANNAPOORANI, ASHOK KUMARSINGH[R-5], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 807/2013XIV-A

TOBA ANGAMI SOMANATHA PADHAN[P-1], [P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1], SRIDHARPOTARAJU[R-3], ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-5],[R-9]

142 Crl.A. No. 681/2012II

TARSEM @ SEMA @ JAGGA SANDEEP NARAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

143 C.A. No. 3773/2015XI-A

C.GIRIJA AND ORS. AMIT SHARMAVersusV.N.MATHUR AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, A. RAGHUNATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 103-107/2016XI-A

CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS.ETC. ETC. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusP.K. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI ANDANR. ETC. ETC. AND ANR. VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R, A. RAGHUNATH

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 80649/2019

144 Crl.A. No.1518-1519/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

Versus

RAJENDRA P. N. RAMALINGAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

145 Crl.A. No. 1287/2012II

BADAL DEB JAVED MAHMUD RAO[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA NIDHI[R-1][GR]

146 Crl.A. No.2205-2206/2011II-C

DEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE ANU GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

RAJESH & ANR ETC. AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2312/2011II-C

RAJESH RAJESH MAHALE

VersusDEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE AND ORS. ANU GUPTA

147 Crl.A. No. 442/2013II

MOHAN KISHORI JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]Mr. Radha Krishna Kumar, Advocate has been appointed as amicus curiae in theinstant matter.

148 Crl.A. No. 190/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusUDAYVEER SINGH KUSWAHA SANJAY K. AGRAWAL

Page 95: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4149 Crl.A. No. 72/2013

II-ASTATE THROUGH SPE, CBI, PATNA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusMANKESHWAR SINGH T. MAHIPALMs. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate (A.C.) for Respondent Accused

150 Crl.A. No. 2432/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNARESH AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], [R-2]

151 C.A. No. 10992/2013IV

HARNEK SINGH . AND ANR. AWANISH SINHAVersusGRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. SHOMILA BAKSHI[CAVEAT]

152 Crl.A. No. 1661/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusHEMRAJ AND ANR. MINAKSHI VIJ[R-2]

153 C.A. No. 7824/2013III-A

OM PRAKASH UPADHYAY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[P-1]Versus

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2], [R-3]

154 C.A. No. 6649/2013III-A

SARLA KUMARI (D) THR. LR. ANKUR YADAV[P-1]VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6650/2013III-A

AJAI KUMAR AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6651/2013III-A

ANURADHA AGARWAL AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6652/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6653/2013III-A

ADARSH KUMAR . AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6655/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGHAL NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6654/2013III-A

RAJIV KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

155 C.A. No. 4859/2014XVI

BALESHWAR RAI AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRAVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

156 C.A. No. 7694/2013XVII-A

THE ORIENTAL INS. COMPANY LTD.KADAPA BRANCH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusK. NARASIMHA REDDY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

157 C.A. No.4531-4533/2013XVII-A

NAVJIVAN ROLLER FLOUR AND PULSEMILLS LTD (THROUGH EXCUTIVEDIRECTOR)

BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]

Versus

Page 96: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTDTHROUGH THE CHAIRMAN GAURAV SHARMA

FOR ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 16888/2013

158 C.A. No.4053-4069/2014XIV-A

SHANKER TRADING (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4189/2019XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONSPVT. LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA[CAVEAT]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 14104/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 4072/2014XIV-A

SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEM THR.FINANCE DIRECTOR MR. YOSHIHISAMIZUNO

KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIIN.D. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16277/2014XII

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CHENNAI V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24756/2014XII

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX COMPANY CIRCLE-V(2) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.PENTASOFT TECHNOLOGIESLTD.(PAN AAACP1895R) THROUGH ITSM.D

K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 719/2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPIRAMAL GLASS LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.193114/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.193115/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1157/2020XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENTSERVICE PVT LTD RAJAT MITTAL[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

159 Crl.A. No. 1957/2013II

TARSEM KAUR AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1][PR], RAJKAMAL[P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]For final disposal.

160 C.A. No. 9146/2012XIV-A

SULTAN SINGH AND ORS.VersusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

ANIRUDH SHARMA, RAJEEVSHARMA[CAVEAT]

NAMES OF THE APPELLANTS AS PER ORDER DATED 25.02.2019 ARE : SH.SULTAN SINGH, SH. RAMESHWAR, SMT. SANTOSH, SH SANDEEP, SH PANKAJ,MS. GEETA, JAI BHAGWAN, SH. OM PRAKASH, SH MANOHAR, SH UMED SINGH,MS SUMAN, MS SHEETAL, SH SUMIT AND SH DEEPAK

161 Crl.A. No. 122/2013II

VIJAYA SINGH AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]Versus

Page 97: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

162 C.A. No. 8762/2012IV-A

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. SIDDHARTH[P-1]

VersusDODDABALLAPUR SPINNING MILLSPRIVATE LIMITED

163 Crl.A. No. 972/2013II

JABIR AND ORS. VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1][GR]

164 Crl.A. No. 2269/2014II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AJAY CHOUDHARY, MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusRAM MURTI

165 C.A. No. 1001/2013III

CHANDRAKANT(DEAD) THR. LRS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]VersusSITALSINGH ASARAM NAIK . AND ORS. ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH[R-1]

166 C.A. No. 8954/2013IV-A

R. VENKATESH SHAILESH MADIYALVersusT.UMA DEVI RAJESH MAHALE[CAVEAT]

167 C.A. No.4337-4338/2013IV-A

PROTYUSH CHATTERJEE AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

VersusSUPER AUTO FORGE PRIVATE LIMITEDAND ANR. DIKSHA RAI

168 C.A. No.9697-9698/2014III-A

HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA . AND ORS. SATPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER ANDANR.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2]

169 Crl.A. No. 377/2015II-C

SURESH @ NAINA SURESH S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2015II-C

SARAVANAN @ KILANGU SARAVANANAND ANR. S. GOWTHAMAN, [P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

170 Crl.A. No. 2049/2014II-C

FULESHWARI BAI JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 18504/2014MR. VIJAY KUMAR L. PARDESHI ,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

171 C.A. No. 9457/2013III-A

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPRTCORPORATION THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusAMAR DAS V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[R-1]

172 C.A. No. 2953/2014IV

RANI TARA DEVI RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2954/2014IV

SHAKUNTLA DEVI RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Page 98: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 1439/2017IV

RANI TARA DEVI KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

173 C.A. No. 7323/2016XIV-A

MIZORAM UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASADVersusDR.LALROKIMA CHENKUAL AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7291/2016XII-A

N.C.H. VARADARAJU SATISH KUMAR

VersusTHE GOVERNMENT OF A.P REP. BY ITSPRL SECRETARY FOR HIGH EDUCATIONAND ORS.

T. V. RATNAM, ANJANI AIYAGARI, VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

174 Crl.A. No. 567/2014II-C

DOSS @ VATTAAKKAN @ PERUMAL @PETHAPERUM ANKUR PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

175 C.A. No. 6944/2015XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR. SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]VersusORISSA KHADI AND VILLAGEINDUSTRIES BOARD KARMACHARISANGHA AND ANR.

KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[CAVEAT], G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], V. K.VERMA[R-2]

176 C.A. No. 10658/2016IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusRADHELAL GOUD

177 C.A. No. 10612/2013IV

BALBIR SINGH AND ORS. YADAV NARENDER SINGH[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-2], SATISHKUMAR[R-5], [R-7], [R-8], SHREE PALSINGH[R-9]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8607/2014IV

KULJIT SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-1], MANJUJETLEY[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-11], [R-12]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.27779-27780/2016IV-B

GURPARTAP SINGH ETC. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

178 Crl.A. No. 62-63/2014II-A

ANOKHILAL K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

179 Crl.A. No. 2567/2014II-C

CHEETRAM JAIL PETITIONVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHTHE NAME OF MS. SAVITRI PANDEY, ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUSCURIAE

180 C.A. No. 10827/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusMD. BARKAT HUSSAIN T. MAHIPAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 10831/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

Versus

Page 99: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4DEEPAK KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL

181 Crl.A. No. 1805/2014II-B

VINODBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR PREETI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

182 Crl.A. No. 301/2014II-B

SURAJMAL (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

183 Crl.A. No.132-133/2017II

STATE OF U.P. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusAJMAL BEG ETC. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]

184 C.A. No.8447-8448/2014XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJEEV SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusNAYEEMA AHMAD SHAKIL AHMED SYED

185 C.A. No. 7177/2015XII-A

M/S.NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS ANNAM D. N. RAOVersusM/S.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.AND ORS.

TATINI BASU, RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA,GAURAV SHARMA, AJAY PAL

186 C.A. No. 11382/2016IV

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MILKPLANT BATHINDA DEVVRAT

VersusDALIP SINGH AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

187 Crl.A. No. 1615/2019II-C

MUNU SEN VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]

188 C.A. No. 3000/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYARVersusSHRI SWARAN SINGH SAMPLA BALRAJ DEWAN

189 C.A. No. 5921/2015XII-A

METPALLI LASUM BAI SINCE DEAD GUNTUR PRABHAKARVersusMETPALLI MUTHAIAH(D) BY LRS ANDORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5922/2015XII-A

METPALLI MUTHAIAH (D) BY LRS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusMETPALLI LASUM BAI (DEAD) BY LRS .AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

IA

190 C.A. No. 7220/2015XII

UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIAUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI

VersusNOORAJAHAN SATYA MITRA GARG[CAVEAT]

191 C.A. No. 12147/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusTHE ORGANIZER DEHRI C.D. AND C.M.UNION LTD. AND ORS. KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[R-2], [R-3]

192 C.A. No. 20830/2017IV-A

PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES(PUCL) THROUGH ITS GENERALSECRETARY AND ANR.

PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUMEER SODHI[R-2]

193 C.A. No. 20918/2017XII-A

M. LUCY RANI AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersus

Page 100: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4SIDDABOINA LAXMINARAYANA . ANDORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[CAVEAT]

194 C.A. No. 3801/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL . AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3802/2017XIV-A

HAMDARD EDUCATION SOCIETY ANDANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusSHRI ABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3803/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI

VersusNAUMAN AHMAD KHAN MAHUA KALRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7737/2018XIV

VARINDER KAUR V. ELANCHEZHIYAN

VersusSCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURUHARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL ANDORS.

ABINASH KUMAR MISHRA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.41869/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.41870/2018-DELETING THE NAME OF RESPONDENT

195 Crl.A. No. 721/2015II

VIJAI BANKEY BIHARI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1]and IA No.16196/2018-SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE/BAIL

196 Crl.A. No. 2460/2014II-B

PARKASH CHAND SHREE PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

197 C.A. No. 2150/2015XVII-A

M/S DLF UNIVERSAL LTD FORMERLYKNOWN AS DLF COMMERICALCOMPLEXES LTD

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusKUSHAL K RANA BANKEY BIHARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5858/2015XVII-A

ROHIT CHAUDHARYAND . AND ANR. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusM/S. VIPUL LTD. M. R. SHAMSHADIA No.121933/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22949/2017XVII-A

EMAAR MGF LAND LTD AND ANR. P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusCHANBIR SINGH MANN AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1], [R-2]IA No.47176/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.47177/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.79678/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

198 Crl.A. No. 2485/2014II-C

RADHEY SHYAM B. SRIDHARVersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

199 C.A. No. 3390/2017XIV-A

KURMA RAO M M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

200 C.A. No. 8424/2015XI-A

STATE OF ODISHA . AND ORS. ANINDITA PUJARIVersus

BIJAY KUMAR NANDA . AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN, DIPESH SINHA[R-11]

Page 101: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4

201 Crl.A. No.1030-1031/2017II-A

RAJA MISHRA @ RAJA RAM MISHRAAND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]ABHISHEK SINGH[I-1][IMPL]

202 C.A. No. 1663/2015III

ARUN EKNATH PAGARE AND ORS. APARNA JHA[P-1]VersusLAXMIBAI BHASKAR DHANRAO . ANDORS. SRM LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1]

203 Crl.A. No. 391/2015II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SATISH KUMAR[P-1][GR]VersusPANKAJ KUMAR KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1][PR], [R-1]

204 C.A. No. 2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.[P-1]VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[R-1], G. BALAJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3090/2015XII

KALYANA SUNDARI R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS. G. BALAJI[R-1]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.640/2015 In C.A. No.2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.

Versus

LAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS.

205 C.A. No. 959/2017III

SHAIKH SALEEMUDDIN AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBEVersus

BABA QUERASHI AND ANR. SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR,SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2]

206 C.A. No. 3673/2015XVII-A

M/S SUPER LABEL MFG. CO. AP & J CHAMBERSVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

207 Crl.A. No.602-603/2017II-A

DR. GANESH JAGANNATH DHUMAL RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[P-1]

VersusSANDEEP SHRIRAM GUPTA AND ANR. R. P. GUPTA[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]

208 C.A. No. 7228/2015XVII-A

HIND OFFSHORE PVT. LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusIFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECO. LTD TATINI BASU[R-1]

209 C.A. No.5502-5503/2017III

PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORYPROCESS TO BE SERVED THR.DIRECTOR AND ANR.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusN.K. SHAH . AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[CAVEAT]

210 C.A. No. 2674/2016XVI

SHASHI BHUSHAN MUKESH RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARYVersusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANDORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

211 C.A. No. 531-535/2016III-A

U.P FOREST CORPORATION KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. VISHNU SHARMA, ANIL KATIYAR

Page 102: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4212 C.A. No.

6608-6609/2016XII

ANIMILLI ATCHIYAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITYPONDICHERRY AND ORS BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1]

213 C.A. No. 6359/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]VersusVINAY KUMAR SYED MEHDI IMAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7234/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusSANTOSH WADHWA, SCIENTIST-E . ANDORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 2575/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusIQBAL HASAN AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29605/2018IV-B

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusKRISHAN LALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152134/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

214 C.A. No. 4400/2016XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

SHASHI KANTAVISHAL ARUN[IMPL], PRAVEENAGRAWAL[R-1], AKSHAY VERMA[R-1]AJAY MARWAH[IMPL]

215 C.A. No. 10132/2016XVII-A

AVAS AYUKT, U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKASPARISHAD . AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA KUNDAN KUMAR LAL

216 C.A. No. 8226/2016XIV-A

SHIV PRAKASH SAXENA . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., GAURAV AGRAWALVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA[R-4], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.16367-16369/2017XII

N. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN EXPORT INSPN COUNCIL .AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 149272/2018ConnectedC.A. No.16364-16366/2017XII

N.KALYANARAMAN AND ORS. AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN OF THE EXPORTINSPECTION COUNCIL AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA, K. R. NAMBIAR[IMPL][PR]

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 321/2011XVI-A

SUKRITI BHUSHAN ROY MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMERCE AND INDUSTRY AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 323/2011XVI-A

DIPAK BHATTACHARYYA AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

Page 103: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4937/2020XIV

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS. RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

217 C.A. No.5339-5341/2016XVI-A

NHPC LTD AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]

Versus

ALL INDIA NHPC DIPLOMA ENGINEERSCOUNCIL AND ANR. ETC.

P. D. SHARMA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-9],ASHOK MATHUR, [R-1], [R-11], [R-12]RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[IMPL]

218 C.A. No. 5994/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR. ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusFAIVELEY TRANSPORT RAILTECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

B. SUNITA RAO, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017List on a non-misc. dayvide court's order dated15.11.2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 5993/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusESCORTS LTD. AND ANR. ANIL SHRIVASTAV

ConnectedC.A. No. 5334/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR.

ARJUN KRISHNAN, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA

VersusSTONE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. ASHOK MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.9680-9690/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. SHADAN FARASAT

Versus

A.R. POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

RITESH KUMAR, RAJKUMARI BANJU[R-4],[R-5], [R-9], [R-12], KEDAR NATHTRIPATHY[R-3], [R-10], SHARMILAUPADHYAY[R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.10981-10985/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA RUCHI KOHLI

Versus

M/S. NARENDRA EXPOSIVES LTD. . ANDORS.

219 C.A. No. 2823/2017III

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersusDR. RAMDAS LAXMANRAO KHESAR ANDORS.

SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR, [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

220 C.A. No. 10888/2016XVII

AMARNATH JHA GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND STATE OFJHARKHAND AND ANR THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR.

KAUSHIK PODDAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10891/2016XVII

VIJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 2/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10892/2016XVII

BIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

Page 104: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4IA FOR ON IA 2/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 10889/2016XVII

AJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusINDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 1/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10890/2016XVII

SHASHI KANT VISHWAKARMA GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORSTHROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA2/2016 FOR ON IA 3/2017

221 C.A. No. 7388/2016XVII-A

MADAN MOHAN PANDA SANTOSH KUMAR - IVersusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED GAURAV SHARMA

222 C.A. No. 7327/2016XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusKALYANI SAMANTA (MONDAL) . ANDORS.

RAUF RAHIM[R-1], KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-2],[R-3]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ][ WITHIN FIRST TEN MATTERS ]

223 C.A. No. 3946/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPAVITRA COMMERCIALS LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 33962-2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSSIONER OFINCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKANAIYALAL M SHETHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151376/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

224 C.A. No. 9691/2016III-A

AKHILESH CHANDRA PORWAL @ A.C.PORWAL RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY .AND ORS. RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3]

225 C.A. No. 10800/2016XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], [R-2], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-1], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10799/2016XVI

RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY .AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA . AND ORS.RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], M. SHOEBALAM[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], PRAVEENSWARUP[R-6]

226 C.A. No. 12200/2016III-A

SHRI KRISHNA SINGH AND ANR. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMANRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS.

T. V. GEORGE[R-2], ABHISHEK YADAV[R-6],VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-7], ARVINDKUMAR[R-8], KAUSAR RAZA FARIDI[R-9]

227 Crl.A. No. 2035/2017II-A

KARU MANJHI RANJAN KUMAR[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF BIHAR DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

Page 105: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4228 Crl.A. No. 342/2017

II-CSHIV RAM ANIL NAG[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

229 C.A. No.8289-8290/2018XII

A. KARPAGAM KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[P-1]

VersusVPG HOUSING PVT LTD AND ORSTHROUGH DIRECTOR VGP BABUDASAND ORS.

M. P. VINOD[R-1], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-3][GR], RAJESH KUMAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8291/2018XII

V.G.P HOUSING PVT LTD. ABHINAV AGRAWAL[P-1][GR]

VersusTHE LAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK,CHENNAI AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], B. BALAJI[R-1]

230 C.A. No. 434/2017III

SHREE NILKANTH DEVELOPERS SANTOSH KRISHNANVersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

231 Crl.A. No. 5-6/2018II-A

VEERENDRA RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ][ TOP OF THEBOARD ]

232 C.A. No.11020-11029/2017X

M/S. KOTDWAR STEELS LTD. SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ONIA 21/2017 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 31/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.12190-12198/2016X

M/S. AMRIT VERSHA UDYOG PVT. LTD.DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD. CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2016ConnectedC.A. No. 1/2017X

M/S ARUNA STEEL PVT LTD DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2017

233 Crl.A. No. 462/2019II

SITA RAM AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR],[P-3][PR], [P-4][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

234 C.A. No. 10753/2017XII

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT, HOME SC DEPARTMENTAND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusY JOHN NICHOLSON, I.P.S. AND ORS. B. BALAJI[R-1]

235 C.A. No. 18835/2017XII

R ANGAYARKANI G.SIVABALAMURUGANVersusTHE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT, UOIAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

Page 106: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 18836/2017XII

M.S.SHARMILA L. K. PANDEY

VersusUNION OF INDIA THE SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT UNION OF INDIAAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

236 Crl.A. No. 654/2017II

NIPUN ANEJA AND ORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

237 Crl.A. No.1381-1382/2017II

MADAN SUNITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES][ DEATH CASE ]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1790/2017II

SUDESHPAL SUNITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.97156/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.97158/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.97157/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

238 Crl.A. No.1398-1400/2017II

NARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. P. V. SARAVANA RAJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

239 C.A. No. 703/2018III

COMPETENT AUTHORITY ANDADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF RAJKOT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusLILAVANTI JAYANTILAL PAREKH SINCEDECEASED THROUGH LRS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[R-1]

240 C.A. No. 21006/2017XII

MCT M. CHIDAMBARAM TRUST G. BALAJIVersusV. RAVICHANDRAN KSN & CO.[CAVEAT]

241 C.A. No. 23508/2017XVII-A

M/S. COIMBATORE PIONEERFETILIZERS LTD. SAKSHI KAKKAR

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANYLTD.

242 C.A. No. 214/2018XI-A

THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. SUBHASISH MOHANTY[P-1]VersusMANGING COMMITTEE OF BHARATIHIGH SCHOOL AND ORS.

SUDARSH MENON[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

Mr. Somanatha padhan, Mr. A.Lakshmi Narayanan, Advocates for Interventionapplicaiton and Mr. Sudarsh Menon Advocate for application for Revocation of SLP

243 SLP(Crl) No.9578-9579/2017II-A

RAJESH AND ANR. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] [ DEATH CASE ]FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 131944/2017

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3173/2018II-A

OM PRAKASH SUPRIYA JUNEJA

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1]

Page 107: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44471/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.44474/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.44468/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

244 C.A. No. 19867/2017XV

MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY ADARSH UPADHYAY

VersusMUKESH KUMAR SHAH TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[ AS FIRST ITEM ]

245 C.A. No. 20917/2017XVII-A

ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANR. ASTHA SHARMAVersusNITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD. KMNP LAW AOR[R-1]

246 Crl.A. No.361-362/2018II

CHOTKAU HARSH PARASHAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH PARMANAND PANDEY[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ]

247 Crl.A. No.255-256/2018II-A

BHAGCHANDRA SRIDEVI PANIKKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHTO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES[ DEATH CASE ]

248 C.A. No.8998-8999/2018XVII-A

M/S ARFAT PETRO CHEMICALS PVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SAKSHI MITTAL[R-1]

249 Crl.A. No. 1537/2018II-B

TAQDIR ROBIN KHOKHARVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENlist the appeal itself of hearing in the second week of February, 2020. (Ref. : R/Pdated 20.9.2019)

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 9260/2018II-B

ARUN ANISH R. SHAH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA3188/2019

ConnectedDiary No. 41453-2018II-B

JYOTI PRAKASH ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.174559/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.174561/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 10962-2019II-B

KULDEEP @ BHANDARI ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusSTATE OF HARYANAIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 57835/2019 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 57837/2019

250 C.A. No. 2372/2019XVII-A

HEBRON DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. P. V. DINESHVersusVINEYARD MEADOWS VILLA OWNERSASSOCIATION BIJU P RAMAN[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-6]

251 C.A. No. 11725/2018XVI

SANAT KUMAR BISWAS AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.VersusBISHNUPRIYA DEY SHASHI KIRAN[CAVEAT]

Page 108: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 4252 Crl.A. No. 400/2019

II-AVILAS RICHA KAPOOR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

253 C.A. No. 4979/2019XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAVersusVEDIC RESORTS AND HOTELS PVT. LTD. SUSMIT PUSHKAR[CAVEAT]

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:03:07

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 109: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 5HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

NOTE:-ON 08.09.2020 AND 10.09.2020

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 4831/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCELLIMITED)

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 5860/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOMS LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE BANGALORE I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.109914/2019-EX-PARTE STAYConnectedC.A. No. 5863/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOM LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSBANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.110020/2019-STAY APPLICATIONConnectedC.A. No.5989-5990/2012IV-A

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .ETC CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8512/2012IV-A

M/S MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

FOR [APPLICATION FOR DE TAGGING] ON IA 4/2016ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17947/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3347/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD KAVITA JHA

Page 110: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No.9201-9202/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S. MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7613/2014III

JABIL CIRCUIT INDIA PVT. LTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE-III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5376/2016XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. SURANA TELECOMAND POWER LTD.) THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRE

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5368/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.)

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5369/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.) THORUGH ITS MANAGINDIRECTOR

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, GOA.

ConnectedC.A. No.11078-11083/2018XVII-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 17260/20192 C.A. No. 4537/2014

XIIANSALDO ENERGIA SPA ANIL SHRIVASTAV[P-1]VersusC.I.T AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][ NOT TO BE TREATED AS PART-HEARD ].

ConnectedC.A. No. 4538/2014XII

ANSALDO ENERGIA SPA ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusC.I.T AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

3 C.A. No. 8426/2011XVII

JHARKHAND STATE ELECT.BAORD HIMANSHU SHEKHARVersusM/S.STAN COMMODITIES PVT.LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

4 C.A. No.6033-6035/2009III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No.10825-10826/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

Page 111: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5

ConnectedC.A. No. 5714/2011III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AND SER TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

5 C.A. No.6228-6229/2009IX

C.C.E.,MUMBAI, THANE-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.CONWOOD PRE-FAB PVT.LTD. THR.ITS. M.D. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

6 C.A. No. 8829/2010XVII

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]

VersusCANTONMENT BOARD,RAMGARHCANTONM.. AND ORS. MADHURIMA TATIA[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ON IA 70392/2009 FOR ON IA 61341/20107 Crl.A. No. 319/2011

II-ARAM SEVAK MODI SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

8 C.A. No. 7293/2016XII

SEENAPPA G. BALAJIVersusR. KRISHNAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS. . ANDORS. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

9 C.A. No. 1599/2011IX

PRABHAT GEN.AGENCIES AND ORS..AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

THE JAMMU AND KASMIR BANK LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJENDER PD. SAXENA, VIKAS SINGHJANGRA, PAREKH & CO., MAHESHTHAKUR[R-5]

10 C.A. No.3852-3853/2017XI-A

A.M.PADMINI AMMA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

V.P.MURALEEDHARAN . AND ORS.VIPIN NAIR[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.,SURESHAN P., SUBHASISH BHOWMICK, P. V.DINESH, ABHIJEET SINHA

11 C.A. No. 9546/2010IV-A

ASHA JOHN DIVIANATHAN S. NARAIN & CO.VersusVIKRAM MALHOTRA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

12 C.A. No.3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

13 C.A. No. 9643/2013XII

B. RAJAM AMMAL (D) BY LRS. K. K. MANIVersusLAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK ANDORS. AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2][GR]

14 C.A. No. 1957/2011XII-A

NASEEM KAHNAM AND ORS. PRABHA SWAMIVersusZAHEDA BEGUM (D) BY LR. AND ORS. ANU GUPTA, S. MAHENDRAN

15 C.A. No. 7923/2013XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusCOLLECTOR LAQ BUDGAM COLLECTORAND ORS.

SATISH PANDEY[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2],[R-3], [R-6]

16 C.A. No. 3548/2017XIV-A

M/S K.P.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIKVersus

Page 112: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], , [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4658/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4657/2013XIV-A

M/S ALI BROTHERS ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3580/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S ALI BROTHERS AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 9291/2012XIV-A

M/S. P.K.AGARWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2012XIV-A

M/S. D.P AGARWAL MOHAN PANDEY, [P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C. LTD. AND ORS.KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-4], [R-5], SHUVODEEPROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2012XIV-A

M/S J.K JAIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2012XIV-A

M/S. R.P. KAKOTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAMAND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8705/2012XIV-A

M/S DIPAK MECH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4660/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4659/2013XIV-A

MOTILIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR EASTERN REGION ONGCNAZIRA AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 113: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 4661/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3579/2017XIV-A

MRIDUL KUMAR ADHYAPAK RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3578/2017XIV-A

M/S PURANA AMULAPATTY JUBAKSOMABAI SAMITY LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3577/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEYCONSTRUCTION AND SUUPLIERSREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRIMRIDUL KUMAR ADH

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMEN AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3575/2017XIV-A

M/S. PROSENJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP, SHUVODEEP ROY,KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3576/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY CONST.AND SUPPLIERS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY, KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3574/2017XIV-A

M/S. RANAJIT BHUYAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2017XIV-A

M/S BISWAJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4662/2013XIV-A

MOTLIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 8693/2012XIV-A

M/S ROBIN BORDOLOI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7954/2012XIV-A

M/S SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 114: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 3557/2017XIV-A

M/S ECOS ENGINEERS SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3554/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3549/2017XIV-A

M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN LTD .AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3551/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3552/2017XIV-A

SANJIB KAKATY R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO. LTD. ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556/2017XIV-A

M/S MOTLIB ALI SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3558/2017XIV-A

M/S D.P.AGARWALA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3553/2017XIV-A

M/S PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT PROP.SHRI PURANJOY BARUAH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3555/2017XIV-A

M/S K.C.CHHAWACHARTYA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3559/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3565/2017XIV-A

PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

Page 115: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2017XIV-A

M/S JYOTI PRASAD BORGOHAINTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. JYOTIPRASAD BORGOHAIN (DEAD) TH. LRS.AND ORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN.LTD.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.3566-3569/2017XIV-A

GHANA GOGOI AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.FOR ON IA 64174/2012

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPSOC.LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD. ANDORS. PRERNA MEHTA, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2017XIV-A

M/S. N.K.SHARMA AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, SHUVODEEPROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3564/2017XIV-A

M/S B.K.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3563/2017XIV-A

M/S DIPAK NATH SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3562/2017XIV-A

M/S P.M.AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3560/2017XIV-A

M/S. JAY KUMAR JAIN SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3550/2017XIV-A

DIPAK NATH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3561/2017XIV-A

M/S. SHIV KUMAR AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

17 C.A. No. 6222/2014XII

SELVRAJ @ URKAVALAN G. BALAJIVersusALAGAR AND ANR. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

Page 116: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 518 C.A. No. 8275/2013

IV-AM/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATHVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8277/2013IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8276/2013IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

19 C.A. No. 614/2013III-A

M/S PRATAP PHARMACEUTICALS AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SECRETARYFINANCE CIVIL SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

20 C.A. No. 3453/2012XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI VI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusVISHNU AND CO. PVT. LTD. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

21 C.A. No. 14013/2015XIV-A

C.I.T CENTRAL,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusMOHAN MEAKIN LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

22 C.A. No.2029-2030/2012III-A

M/S. NARAIN AUTOMOBILES, LUCKNOW T. MAHIPAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,LUCKNOW ANIL KATIYAR

23 C.A. No. 8605/2011XI-A

M/S. SAKTHI METAL DEPOT R. N. KESWANIVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

24 C.A. No. 4195/2011III

RAMANBHAI GOJIYA TANDEL POWEROF ATTORNEY KAVITA JHA, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX,VALSAD AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, [CAVEAT], ANIL KATIYAR

25 C.A. No. 4197/2011III

VALLABHBHAI MADHAVBHAI .TANDELTHR.POA D.J.TANDEL P. V. SARAVANA RAJA, [P-1], [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX,VALSAD AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR, , B. V. BALARAM DAS[CAVEAT]

26 C.A. No. 4196/2011III

MAHESH D.THAKKAR (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. KAMALABEN MAHESHCHANDRATHAKAR

P. V. SARAVANA RAJA[P-1], [P-2]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX. ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[CAVEAT], ANIL KATIYAR

27 C.A. No. 2745/2012IV-A

M/S UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATHVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6642/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

Page 117: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5M/S UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS)LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3629/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2746-2747/2012IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2744/2012IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1], [R-1]

28 C.A. No.7758-7759/2011XIV-A

ECS LIMITED KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedC.A. No.7760-7761/2011XIV-A

ECS LTD., NEW DELHI KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.7762-7763/2011XIV-A

ECS LTD NEW DELHI KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22193/2013IV-B

C.I.T.-1 AMRITSAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BATALA COOPERATIVE SUGARMILLS LTD. BADRI PRASAD SINGH

Service is complete. List along with main matters.ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22192/2013IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. GURDASPUR COOPERATIVE SUGARMILLS LTD. PANIAR BADRI PRASAD SINGH

Service is Complete. List along with main matters.29 C.A. No. 5088/2011

XIV-AVAN OARD ACZ INDIA LTD KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5089/2011XIV-A

C.I.T,NEW DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusVAN OORD ACZ INDIA P.LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10479/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVAN OORD ACZ INDIA P.LTD KAVITA JHA

30 C.A. No. 5073/2011IV-A

KHODAY INDIA LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

Page 118: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5

31 C.A. No. 3597/2012XIV-A

KUNTI DEVI BIMAL ROY JADVersusDEEP KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2], [R-3]

32 C.A. No.8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[R-1], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[CAVEAT]and IA No.120464/2017-IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD ALONG WITHAFFIDAVIT and IA No.120470/2017-IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALDEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER NO 2 and IA No.120473/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IA No.120477/2017-IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENTAGAINST THE DECEASED and IA No.120479/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING(Case is to be listed alongwith CA 8075-8076/2010)

33 Crl.A. No. 10/2011II-B

HARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

34 C.A. No. 8826/2011IV-A

GURAPPA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICER

35 C.A. No. 1958/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusANU MEHRA MOHINDER JIT SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11426/2012XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusVIKAS JAIN AND ANR.

36 C.A. No.10159-10161/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AHMEDABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S URMIN PRODUCTS P.LTD. . ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 5146/2015XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. FLAKES-N-FLAVOURZ M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 959/2019XVII-A

C.CE S.T. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTARA CHAND NARESH CHAND RAJAT MITTAL[CAVEAT]

Page 119: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5FOR ADMISSION and IA No.170411/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.170409/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6938-2019XVII-A

C.C.E AND S.T. JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A.M PRODUCTS AJAY CHOUDHARY[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41836/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.41835/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 14581-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MEERUT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOM PAN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD M. P. VINOD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84500/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84501/2019-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedDiary No. 44912-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKAIPAN PAN MASALA PVT. LTD. ANDORS. KISHAN DATTA[R-1]

IA No.21656/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.21655/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.21653/2020-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.21654/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 2810-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDAIA No.45280/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.45283/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.45278/2020-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.45285/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.45281/2020-PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedDiary No. 3484-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.34401/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3487-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDAIA No.45336/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45339/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 3492-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.31773/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3513-2020XVII-A

M/S. DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]IA No.34599/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 120: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedDiary No. 3536-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.36769/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3544-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34554/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGConnectedDiary No. 3545-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34991/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGConnectedDiary No. 3547-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34342/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.34346/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 2469/2020XVII-A

M/S. DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]IA No.45315/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45317/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

37 C.A. No.10180-10181/2010XII-A

RAMANAVARAPU SAMPATH KUMAR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPIDIKITI VENKATARATNAM (D) BY LRS. DUA ASSOCIATES[CAVEAT], SATYA MITRA

38 C.A. No. 6515/2012IV

M/S. KARNAL MILK FOODS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[INT]

IA No.67821/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONLY IN C.A. NO. 6515 OF 2012and IA No.89861/2017-XTRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6522/2012IV

M/S. BHARAT DAIRY UDYOG AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6520/2012IV

M/S. DAILY FOODS (INDIA) AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA ANIMALHUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6525/2012IV

M/S. KWALITY DAIRY INDIA LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6530/2012IV

M/S.G.K.DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTSPVT. LTD AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

Page 121: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 6523/2012IV

M/S STERLING AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH, R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6524/2012IV

M/S MODERN DAIRIES LTD. AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], M. P.DEVANATH[P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6528/2012IV

M/S. SMRITI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6527/2012IV

M/S HARYANA MILK FOODS LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6518/2012IV

M/S GOLDMINE MILKFOOD .LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6519/2012IV

KMG MILK FOOD LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11193/2014IV

M/S MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 2208/2020IV

HERITAGE FOODS LIMITED GUNTUR PRAMOD KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33597/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

39 C.A. No. 5593/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA

Versus

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN,[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5594/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANUVRAT SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAVINDRA KUMAR, [R-5]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.267/2011 In C.A. No.5593/2012I-B

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

D.AGGARWAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10262/2016XI

AJEET SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P ANUVRAT SHARMA

40 C.A. No. 8777/2012IX

MAHADEO BALIRAM NAWALKAR(DEAD)THROUGH LRS. NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

Versus

Page 122: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5

AMBADAS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

41 C.A. No. 7238/2011XIV-A

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

42 C.A. No. 1392/2011XI-A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

43 C.A. No. 9485/2013XI-A

VELAYUDHAN NADAR NARAYAN NADAR SUMITA HAZARIKAVersusB.K.THANKAPPAN AND ORS. M. P. VINOD

44 C.A. No. 10215/2011IV-A

SHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY[R-1]

45 C.A. No. 6667/2013XII-A

PYLA DEMUDAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusCHEEPURUPALLI CHANDRAMMA ANDORS. AND ORS.

M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

IA No.89692/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and46 C.A. No. 886-887/2016

IV-ASHARANABASAPPA LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusNAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22517/2011IV-A

NAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSHARANABASAPPA . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

47 C.A. No. 4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 and IANo.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

48 C.A. No.12048-12049/2018IV-A

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHAAND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS./ALLAMDODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ABDUL AZEEMKALEBUDDE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.12050-12053/2018IV-A

ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. .ETC .ETC ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

VersusSINGAMASETTY VENKATARAMAIAH .AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

49 Crl.A. No. 627/2012II-C

MUTHU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

Page 123: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2012II-C

RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], T.HARISH KUMAR[P-2], SURESHAN P.[P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

50 C.A. No.8220-8221/2012IX

MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. .AND ANR. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI

51 Crl.A. No. 818/2014II

NARAYAN DUTT JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

52 C.A. No.7825-7828/2013XII

V.N.A.S.CHANDRAN ZOHEB HOSSAIN[P-1][PR]

Versus

MRS. S. VENILLA AND ORS. AND ORS. ARAVINDH S.[R-1], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-2],[R-2], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]

53 Crl.A. No. 1856/2012II-C

RAJRANI ARJUN GARGVersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW STATE OFCHHATISGARH) PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1]

54 C.A. No. 2614/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusTEXMACO LIMITED . AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

55 C.A. No. 928/2016IV-A

RAMKALI SONI AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusMUKTA SONI AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

56 C.A. No. 2920/2014IV

SATYA PAL SHARMA AND ANR. ROHIT KUMAR SINGHVersusASHA VERMA (D) THR. LRS. PIYUSH SHARMA

57 C.A. No.3405-3407/2012III

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAXRAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. NIKHIL JAIN[R-1]

58 Crl.A. No. 794/2013II-B

BHAG SINGH J. P. DHANDA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

59 C.A. No.7791-7796/2013III

KALUBHAI KHATUBHAI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

60 C.A. No. 7283/2012IV-A

M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE . AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.5066-5073/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHREE RENUKA SUGAR LTD. ETC.ETC.

KUSH CHATURVEDIHARISH PANDEY[INT]

61 C.A. No. 4750/2013III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusTEJPAL SINGH CHAUHAN (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

Page 124: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 562 C.A. No. 8903/2012

XIV-ABISHAN DEVI (D) TR. LRS. MOHIT D. RAMVersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANDORS.

SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8904/2012XIV-A

M/S GUPTA MACHINE TOOLS LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5538/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusHARSH GUPTA . AND ORS. MOHIT D. RAM, ATUL KUMAR

63 C.A. No. 9145/2012XIV-A

NARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

64 Crl.A. No. 1594/2013II

KALAWATI AND ANR. TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OFUTTARAKHAND) KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1595/2013II

MANVENDRA SINGH TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FARRUKH RASHEED[R-1][GR]UID FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 58393/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATIONON IA 104936/2018

65 Crl.A. No. 762/2015II

IRFAN S. S. NEHRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]IA No.108849/2017 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IA No.108852/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. IA No.18562/2015 APPLN. U/S 7A OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACTETC. IA No.18563/2015 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

66 Crl.A. No. 1348/2014II

NITYA NAND P. K. JAIN[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]MANJU JETLEY[IMPL]

67 C.A. No. 8880/2014XII

J.K.TYRE TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LTD.THR. GENERAL MANAGER (LEGAL) BINA GUPTA

VersusMICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ORS. THR.CHAIRMAN

PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR

MEDIATION REPORT RECEIVED IN C.A NOS. 8880, 8881, 8885-86, 8888ConnectedC.A. No. 8884/2014XII

M/S CEMENT CORP. OF INDIA ANIRUDH SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESAND ANR.

PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT], VINODH KANNAB.[R-1]

FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 102564/2019ConnectedC.A. No. 8881/2014XII

J.K. TYRE INDUSTRIES LTD. BINA GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

Page 125: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5MICRO AND SMALL INDUSTRIESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-1]

FOR FOR ON IA 25514/2013 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 19592/2018ConnectedC.A. No.8885-8886/2014XII

M/S TAMIL NADU MEDICINAL PLANTFARMS AND ETC. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[P-1][GR]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1], KAUSHAL YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8888/2014XII

PRIME TECHNOLOGIES PARTHA SIL

VersusHAMSA WATCH GLASS PVT. LTD. PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT]IA FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 23468/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 8891/2014XII

M/S SPML INFRA LIMITED UDAYADITYA BANERJEE[P-1]

VersusTHE MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1]

and FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 133784/201768 Crl.A. No. 257/2013

II-AFIROZ KHAN AKBARKHAN VIPIN KUMAR JAI[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

69 C.A. No. 6859/2014IV-A

PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS. BINA GUPTAVersusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1.3], [R-1.2]

70 C.A. No. 3312/2015XII-A

GUNDLURI GOVINDA REDDY SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersusMALLU VENKATARAMANA REDDY ANDORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[CAVEAT]

71 Crl.A. No. 2206/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusLAXMAN AND ORS.

72 C.A. No.14053-14054/2015XII

S. SHIVAKUMAR PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusS. VALLIKANNU @ VALLIAMMAL ANDORS S. MAHENDRAN

73 Crl.A. No. 549/2015II-B

RAJINDER SINGH @ RAVINDER SINGH VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

74 Crl.A. No. 1320/2014II-A

KISHORE SHANKAR PATIL ADITYA SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

75 Crl.A. No. 1529/2014II-A

HARJITSINGH RAJ KAMAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1539/2014II-A

RAMAKANT RAMRAO DENGALE ANDANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1530/2014II-A

TUKARAM V. K. SIDHARTHAN[P-1]

Versus

Page 126: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1541-1544/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SHIVAJIRAO THORAT ANDANR. UDAY B. DUBE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1531/2014II-A

ABA @ DNYANDEO TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1545-1547/2014II-A

ABDUL HAQ FAKIR MOHAMMADKURESHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1534/2014II-A

HARDIK SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1533/2014II-A

BALKISAN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1532/2014II-A

RUCHIN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS ON IA 114874/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2014II-A

AJAY AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1535/2014II-A

VASANT ASTHA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1536/2014II-A

RAGHUNATH RAMNATH ZOLEKAR KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1540/2014II-A

AKASH SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1548/2014II-A

CHETAN RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2161-2164/2014II-A

ASHOK ARVIND S. AVHAD[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.705-706/2015II-A

VILAS SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

Versus

Page 127: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

76 C.A. No.9228-9231/2013XII

LAKSHMI MOHAN AND ANR. SHAKUN SHARMA

VersusM/S. AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD. AND ANR.

V. BALACHANDRAN[CAVEAT], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-2]

ConnectedDiary No. 31322-2018XII

THE CHIEF MANAGER ANDAUTHORIZED OFFICER M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusM/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.136132/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.1441-1446/2014XII

M/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENG. PVT LTD V. BALACHANDRAN, [CAVEAT]

Versus

LAKSHMI MOHAN & ORS SHAKUN SHARMA, M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-3]

77 C.A. No.5667-5668/2014IV-A

M LAKSHMANA RAO AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

VersusS NARAYANA RAO AND ORS. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

78 C.A. No. 455/2015III-A

JAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

79 Crl.A. No. 386/2015II

UMED SINGH . AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

80 C.A. No. 35/2019XIV-A

HAROLI BLOCK INDUSTRIESASSOCIATION DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4], ANIL KATIYAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 36-38/2019XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH VYAPAR MANDAL SIDDHARTH SINGLA[P-1], SANTOSHKRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6], MANSOORALI[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 39/2019XIV-A

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], MANSOOR ALI[R-5]KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 40/2019XIV-A

RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 43/2019XIV-A

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-3], [R-4]

Page 128: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 44-46/2019XIV-A

INDIAN CONFECTIONERYMANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION DUA ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 41-42/2019XIV-A

BRANDED EDIBLE OIL MANUFACTURESASSOCIATION AND ANR. DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

Versus

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-9], [R-10], ANILKATIYAR[R-7], [R-11]

81 C.A. No. 15098/2017XIV-A

M/S AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusMAHESH UDYOG MANAGED BY M/SSHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2]

82 C.A. No.6325-6326/2015XII-A

AKELLA LALITHA SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA

VersusKONDA HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR.

83 Crl.A. No. 531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ANR. GEETHA KOVILAN[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

84 Crl.A. No. 521/2015II-A

SURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

85 C.A. No. 9253/2017III

MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD(NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITSLIMITED)

KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

86 C.A. No. 9725/2014IV-A

M/S. MARUTI ISPAT AND ENERGY PVTLTD.Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]VIKAS MEHTA[INT], ROHIT K. SINGH[INT],RANJAN KUMAR[P-1], [INT], E. C.AGRAWALA[INT]

IA No.140166/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.21230/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.10355-10357/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]RAJEEV SINGH[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10497/2014IV-A

DAVANGERE SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 523/2015IV-A

HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKAREKARKHANE NIYAMIT M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGLORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 129: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 9271/2014IV-A

M/S ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10299/2014IV-A

DECCAN CEMENTS LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMIISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 429/2015IV-A

M/S AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVTLTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 7/2015IV-A

TOPWORTH STEEL AND POWERPVT.LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISIONER OF CUSTOMS,VISHAKAPATNAM AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 430-432/2015IV-A

M/S SWASTIK COAL CORP. PVT LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3131/2015IV-A

M/S. KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3769/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S DEVANGERE SUGAR COMPANYLTD. MEERA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.5999-6000/2015III

M/S. WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5722-5723/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE CUSETC. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSWASTIK COAL CORPORATION PVT.LTD. ETC. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2638/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

Page 130: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 5877/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.8916-8917/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

ZUARI CEMENT LTD AND ANR. MEERA MATHUR[R-1], CHARANYALAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3118/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVIJAYAWADA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSHREE JAYAJOTHI CEMENTS LTD RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2016IV-A

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDSERVICE TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedDiary No. 12289-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSJAMNAGAR (PREV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AQUAGEL CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.IA No.73729/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.73728/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.73727/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 9241-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSKANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ORIENT ABRASIVES LTD. ANEESH MITTAL[R-1]IA No.78833/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.78836/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.78835/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.78834/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

87 C.A. No. 10292/2014IV-A

VIBGYOR SCHOOL, N S PALYA AND ORS. M. RAMBABU AND CO.VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10293/2014IV-A

CHRIST SCHOOL (ICSE) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10294/2014IV-A

ST. MIRAS SCHOOL PRABHA SWAMI

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.21715-21717/2018III

RAJKOT KELAVANI SAMAJ (ST. MARYENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL MORBI )THROUGH PRINCIPAL DAVIS MANJALY

GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22396/2018III

AYYAPPA EDUCATION CENTRE(SABARIVIDYALAYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116654/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155917/2018

Page 131: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedSLP(C) No.23243-23244/2018III

JAMNAGAR EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA120296/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155937/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23035/2018III

STELLA MARIS TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 156008/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.22368-22370/2018III

MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX SYRIANCHURCH BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116486/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155959/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23227/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 155870/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23037/2018III

BASIL TRUST BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118805/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155895/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23173-23174/2018III

SACHIDANANAD VIDYALAYA TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119734/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30083-2018III

ASHADHAMSEVA MANDAL VAPI (ST.XAVIERS SCHOOL KHILODA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118455/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118459/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30108-2018III

MATRU JYOTHI EDUCATIONALTRUST(SCHOOL JAM KAMABALIYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118749/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118750/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30117-2018III

ST. ANNES HIGH SCHOOL TRUST (STANNES SCHOOL NADIAD) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 132: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 116907/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30122-2018III

THE PROVINCIAL SOCIETY OF THECONGREGATION OF JESUS AND MARY(CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARY GIRLSSCHOOL

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118759/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118760/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30160-2018III

AUXILIUM SOCIETY (AUXILIUMCONVENT SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118761/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118762/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155970/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30164-2018III

DAKOR SALESIAN SOCIETY (DONBOSCO ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118499/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118500/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22983/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ANR. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118414/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30413-2018III

DIVINE CHILD SEVA KENDRA AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 119622/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119627/2018

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 581/2019X

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

88 Crl.A. No. 2555/2014II-C

ATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

89 C.A. No. 6282/2015XII

THE STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTIONCORP. OF TAMIL NADU LTD SUDARSH MENON

VersusT. H. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER, GARIMA PRASHAD

90 Crl.A. No. 1265/2015II

RAM BETI C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[R-1]

91 Crl.A. No. 1962/2017II-A

M/S. KITPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]Versus

Page 133: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMIT K. NAIN[R-2],ASHISH RANA[R-3]

92 Crl.A. No. 1683/2017II-C

SURESHA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI, [R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1684/2017II-C

PRABHUSWAMY RAJESH MAHALE

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S., , MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

93 C.A. No.5094-5098/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, DAMAN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELLKNOWN SYNTHETICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER

RAHUL GUPTA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 820-823/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS & SRVICE TAX, VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHILOSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 9/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 88605/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.1111-1117/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BEEKALYON SYNTHERICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 15/2016ConnectedC.A. No.9214-9235/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT - I, (GUJRAT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 45/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7240/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No.1988-1991/2020XVII-A

M/S CENTURY ENKA LTD. O. P. GAGGAR

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISERAIGADFOR ADMISSION and IA No.41181/2020-EX-PARTE STAY

94 Crl.A. No. 1418/2015II-A

TALASHO DEVI @ TARAWATI DEVI SUBHRO SANYALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

95 C.A. No. 14622/2015XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]Versus

Page 134: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5RAM GOPAL AGARWALA . AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14623/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

VersusBRC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 39165/201996 Crl.A. No. 1067/2017

IIHANSRAJ LAXMIDAS MERCHANT P. V. DINESH[P-1]VersusRAJESH RATHI AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2]

97 C.A. No. 720-722/2019XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMADVersusJ.K. TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDFORMERLY KNOWN AS J.K. INDUSTRIESLIMITED

G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

98 C.A. No.23986-23987/2017IV

SUSHIL KUMAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTAPTESH KAUR @ TAAPTESH KAURAND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

99 Crl.A. No. 588/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN D.S.K. LEGAL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 589/2016II-A

FIROZ SHAIKH AND ANR. VIPIN NAIR

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN . AND ANR. D.S.K. LEGAL

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 48/2016PIL-W

PT. PARMANAND KATARA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

100 C.A. No. 10020/2017IV

SEEMA DAHIYA AND ANR. GAUR & NEHRA LAW FIRM[P-1]Versus

COL. DHARAMPAL (RETD.) AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR[R-1][PR], HARSH V.SURANA[R-2][PR]

and IA No.128745/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128746/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129743/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR ON IA 1/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 3/2017

101 Crl.A. No. 901/2016II-B

MAINUDDIN GAZI SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 8202/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL COMMUNICATION PVT LTDTHR. FINANCIAL ADVISOR

ConnectedDiary No. 9270-2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI-IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL INDUSTRIESIA No.42446/2017-STAY APPLICATION

103 C.A. No. 20903/2017XIV-A

MANOJ CHATURVEDIVersusSANGEETA CHATURVEDI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

Page 135: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5104 Crl.A. No.

592-593/2017II-C

SRI M. H. SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

105 C.A. No.10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

106 Crl.A. No. 60-63/2017II-A

HIRA MANDAL ANIL K. CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

107 Crl.A. No. 281/2017II

KAILASH CHANDRA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

108 C.A. No. 1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15149/2017IV-A

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1], [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

109 C.A. No. 6077/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER

VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ADVOCATE ABHAY KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ABHAY KUMAR

110 C.A. No. 3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][GR], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][GR], RAM NARESHYADAV[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

111 C.A. No. 19652/2017XIV-A

PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ADITYA VERMAVersusKAVERI SEED COMPANY LIMITED ANDOTHERS RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.19653-19654/2017XIV-A

REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

Page 136: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 5PRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LIMITED ANDORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3]

IA No.53223/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.53227/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

112 C.A. No. 7269/2018XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR SATISH PANDEY[P-1]VersusTHE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATEACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ANDORS.

SATYA MITRA[R-1], [R-2]

113 C.A. No. 3021/2019XV

BRIJ BIHARI AGARWAL (BHAGAT) ANDANR. SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusSUNIL CHAND KOTHARI B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]

114 C.A. No. 454/2018III

NABABAI DEVCHAND SHINDE AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

115 Crl.A. No. 660/2019II-A

ARUN KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-2]

116 C.A. No. 2374/2019III

M/S FEDERAL BANK PALLAVI PRATAPVersus

JYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS.S. R. SETIA[CAVEAT], ANURADHAMUTATKAR[R-4], ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-6], K J JOHN AND CO[R-7]

[ RELEASED FROM PART- HEARD ] [ TO RETAIN ITS POSITION ]ConnectedC.A. No. 3291/2019III

KISHORE J JANANI ANURADHA MUTATKAR[P-1]

VersusJYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2019III

JYOTI H MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[P-1]

Versus

KISHORE J. JANANI AND ORS.ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1], PALLAVIPRATAP[R-2], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-4], KJ JOHN AND CO[R-5]

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:01:41

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 137: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 6HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

NOTE:-ON 09.09.2020

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 Crl.A. No. 2024/2008

II-CPAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICEAND ORS. ETC.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], GEETHAKOVILAN[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

2 Crl.A. No. 1041/2007II-C

SHIVARAJ . AND ANR. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA, [P-1], [P-2]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

3 Crl.A. No.1616-1618/2008II

JAYASREE DESAI AND ANR. YOGINDER HANDOO[P-1]

Versus

SANJAY MUTHA AND ANR. SUDHA GUPTA[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5226/2013XVII-A

SANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI, [CAVEAT]

VersusDR. JAYASHREE DESAI . AND ORS. YOGINDER HANDOO

ConnectedC.A. No. 4626/2013XVII-A

JAYASHREE DESAI YOGINDER HANDOO

VersusSANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6705/2013XVII-A

DR. P. SAMPATH KUMAR YOGINDER HANDOO

VersusMR. SANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[CAVEAT]

4 C.A. No. 2646/2009XVII-A

BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS THROUGHITS PRESIDENT JASBIR SIGH MALIK DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2647/2009XVII-A

DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONTHROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MOHINDER JIT SINGH[P-1]

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

Page 138: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 2649/2009XVII-A

M.MATHIAS DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2648/2009XVII-A

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH BYITS SECRETARY MR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

VersusD.K.GANDHI . PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA, RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 6959/2011XVII-A

PANDIT DNYANDEV UBALE ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

VersusDNYANESHWAR RAMHARI PHOPLE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8214/2017XVII-A

A. RAGHAVENDRA ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusM. RAJAMANNAR N. ANNAPOORANI

5 C.A. No.3180-3182/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MEDICAL COL. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

AMIT KUMAR, SARLA CHANDRA, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, GAURAVAGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No.3183-3185/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MED.COLLEGE AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, SARLA CHANDRA,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,GOPAL SINGH, GAURAV SHARMA

6 C.A. No.9981-9982/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH(D) BY LRS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

VersusSHROMANI GURDWARAPRABND.COMMITT.

KAMALDEEP GULATIJYOTI MENDIRATTA[INT][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9983/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH (D) TR.LRS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusSHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDAKCOMMIT. KAMALDEEP GULATI

7 C.A. No. 6991/2015XII

THE DIRECTOR OF TEACHERSTRAINING RESEARCH EDUCATION ANDANR.

VINODH KANNA B.[P-1][GR]

VersusO.M.JESSYMOL V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6992/2015XII

A.S.KUPPUSAMY RAKESH K. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU . AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1][GR]

8 C.A. No. 2297/2011XVI

M/S.K.B.TEA PRODUCT PVT.LTD. ANDANR. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2302/2011XVI

M/S LOCHAN TEA LTD. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

Page 139: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2301/2011XVI

M/S.DALMIA ENTERPRIESES AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2303/2011XVI

M/S M.B.TEA AND ALLIED PRODUCTSPVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2305/2011XVI

M/S.SHIB SHAKTI TEA PACKETERS ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2298/2011XVI

M/S MODANWAL TEA CENTRE ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.OF COMMERCIALTAX . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2300/2011XVI

M/S.M.S.TEA .AND AGRO CO. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2299/2011XVI

MADHU BANSAL AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILLIGURI .AND ORS.

PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2304/2011XVI

M/S VIKASH PACKERS AND EXPORTSAND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

9 C.A. No. 5564/2009IV

IMPROVEMENT TRUST ROPAR BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSHASHI BALA AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

10 C.A. No. 10639/2010XVI

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusDILIP BHUSHAN AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

11 C.A. No. 1949/2010XI-A

KANIKA DEY RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]Versus

TRUPTIRANI PARIDA AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[R-1], SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-3], K. L. JANJANI[R-4]

12 C.A. No. 4203/2010XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPN OF DELHI RAKESH KUMAR-IVersusM/S. KAY KAY CORPN.

13 C.A. No. 4064/2010IX

RAMCHANDRA SAKHARAMGALANDE(D)TR.LRS.&OR ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusSITARAM DNYANU GALANDE(D)TR.LRS.. AND ORS. K. N. RAI

Page 140: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 614 C.A. No.

8904-8907/2010IV

M/S.SHIVALI ENTERPRISES ETC. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

GODAWARI (D) THR.LRS. AND ORS. ETC.ABHISHEK ATREY, [R-1.6], [R-1.4], M. A.CHINNASAMY, AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA, A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 8908/2010IV

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusM/S SHIVALI ENTERPRISES

15 C.A. No.6182-6183/2009XIV-A

BAINI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusDURGA DEVI RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

16 C.A. No. 3603/2011XI-A

T. P. SARASA HIMINDER LAL[P-1]Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], BIJU P RAMAN[R-1],ASHWANI BHARDWAJ[R-1]

17 C.A. No. 4247/2009XII-A

N.RAVINDRA MURTHY ANJANI AIYAGARIVersus

VEERBHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE ANDORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-2], [R-3], V. N. RAGHUPATHY,[R-4][PR]

and IA No.89629/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS18 C.A. No. 4645/2011

XIIS.RAMASWAMY S. R. SETIAVersusMANAGEMENT OF CANARA BANK . ANDORS. MADHU SIKRI

19 C.A. No. 6144/2010XV

M/S PEACOCK INDUSTRIES LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

20 C.A. No. 5178/2008IV-A

ACC LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BALGAUM-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

21 C.A. No.7138-7147/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(EXPORTS)NHEVASHEVA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBAKUL PAREKH ETC. ETC.

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.2522/2010IX

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

A.S. VASAN AND SONS (BOMBAY) K. L. JANJANI

22 C.A. No. 8225/2009IX

CHOWGULE & COMPANY LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusASSISTANT DIRECTOR GEN.OFFOREN.TRD.&ORS ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

23 C.A. No. 3110/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT1 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S RISHABH VALVELEEN (P) LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR TANUJ BAGGA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3109/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 141: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6M/S RISHABH VALVELEEN(P) LTD.DIRECTOR TANUJ BAGGA[R-1]

24 Crl.A. No. 2178/2009II-B

RAJBIR K. K. MOHANVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 266-268/2010XVII-A

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHADIEVAM GRAMODHYOG COMMISSIONAND ORS.

CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusABDUL MATIN AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

26 Crl.A. No. 1721/2009II

KESHAV KUMAR GUPTA SONAL JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

27 Crl.A. No. 1096/2009II-B

DILBAGH SINGH @ BAGHAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

28 C.A. No. 3773/2011III-A

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED THROUGHITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER(SALES AND P.R.) R.K. SINHA

ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29516/2013XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.(ASSTT.)TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12236-12237/2018XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD. ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX U. P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54910/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.54907/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 10047-2018XI

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66415/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.66417/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.66416/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

29 C.A. No. 2759/2009XVII-A

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTDTHROUGH ITS MANAGER MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S.BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIPS LTD. MANIK KARANJAWALAFOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 29850/2009

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10001/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIP LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.5242-5243/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIPS LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA3/2009 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2009

Page 142: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 630 C.A. No.

6690-6692/2009XVII-A

S.BALACHANDRAN SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusM/S RAMANIYAM REAL ESTATES LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERFOR ON IA 110373/2011

31 C.A. No.6929-6930/2009XIV-A

EX. SQN. LDR. R.SOOD ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

32 C.A. No. 5731/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADUREPRESENTED BY THE SPECIALCOMMISSIONER AND COMMISSIONEROF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5732/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

VersusTAMILNADU REPRESENTED BY THESPECIAL COMMISSIONER ANDCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES EZHILAGAM AND AND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], [R-2]

33 C.A. No. 1415/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. K. V. VIJAYAKUMARVersusTAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIALTRIBUNAL THE REGISTRAR . AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1416/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. THR.PROPRIETOR MADHUSMITA BORA[P-1]

VersusT.N.TAXATION SPL.TRIBUNAL AND ORSTHE REGISTRAR R. NEDUMARAN[R-1]

34 Crl.A. No. 1722/2010II-B

NARESH KUMAR APARNA JHAVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

35 Crl.A. No. 987/2011II

MUKESH KHARE . AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ANDANR.

T. MAHIPAL, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD

36 C.A. No. 2576/2010IV

M/S. MUNJAL SHOWA LTD. RAJESH KUMARVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE (DELHI IV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5608/2011IV

M/S FRIENDS TRADING CO. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

37 Crl.A. No. 515/2009II-A

AVINASH BHOSALE COAC[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 516/2009II-A

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusAVINASH BHOSALE AND ORS. COAC[R-1]

Page 143: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 7611/2009II-A

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FEMA/PMLAENFORCEMENT DIRECTORTE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

PHILIP ANANDRAJ AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], SACHINPATIL[R-2]

38 C.A. No. 1798/2010XVI

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORTADMIN.)KOLKATA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusEKTARA EXPORTS PVT.LTD. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

39 C.A. No. 9582/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9583/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9585/2011III-A

M/S.MAJHOLA DISTIL.ANDCHEM.WORKS, MAJHOLA, PILIBHIT PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADETAX/COMMERCIAL TAX COMMISSIONER GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9584/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS THROUGH GENERALMANAGER

PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX.U.P. LUCKNOW GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9590/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusM/S KESAR ENTERPRISES LTD.

40 C.A. No.2338-2339/2010XI-A

HEINZ INDIA LIMITED PAREKH & CO.[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6633/2012XII

GLAXO SMITHKLINE PARMACEUTICALSLTD. THROUGH THE MANAGINGDIRECTOR

PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6635/2012XII

GLAXOSMITHKLINEPHARMACEUTICALS LTD. PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

41 C.A. No. 5461/2010IV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD. AND ORS. R. PARTHASARATHY

42 C.A. No. 6561/2008IX

CCE,MUMBAI-III B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

Page 144: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.6562-6563/2008IX

CCE, MUMBAI -III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

43 C.A. No. 6695/2009XIV-A

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. SHUVODEEP ROYVersusM/S.SWAPAN KUMAR PAUL AND ORS. RAJIV MEHTA, , RAJIV NANDA[R-2]

44 C.A. No. 5526/2011III

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXC.ANDCUS.SURAT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S HEUBACH COLOUR P.LTD. THR ITSDIRECTOR RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

45 C.A. No.4279-4280/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL ANDSERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. HITECH AUTO CRAFTS RADHA SHYAM JENA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8613/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRIVANDRUM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA STATE TRANSPORTCORPORATION RADHA SHYAM JENA

46 C.A. No. 570/2010XII

LAKSHMI VIDHYA SANGAM REP. BY ITSSECRETARY AND TREASURER MS.SHOBHANA RAMACHANDRAN

V. BALACHANDRAN

VersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICERAND ANR. T. HARISH KUMAR

47 C.A. No. 7269/2009XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]VersusCOMMR.CEN.EXCISE ANDCUS.BHUBANESHWAR

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1]

48 C.A. No.2589-2599/2011XII-A

COMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,HYDERABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHRIRAM REFRIGERATIONINDUSTRIES M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3554/2016XI

M/S. HONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTSLTD. RAHUL JAIN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

49 C.A. No. 4001/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXE. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCECO.LTD. THR. ITS MANAGER R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

50 C.A. No. 3634/2009XV

M/S RAGHUVEER METAL INDUSTRIESLTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE JAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

51 C.A. No. 8056/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE & CUS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S SHREE VENKATESH STEELS LTD. S. NARAIN & CO.

52 C.A. No. 3992/2009IV-A

COMMR.OF CEN,EXC.HYDERABAD B. KRISHNA PRASADVersus

Page 145: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6CENTRE FRO DEVT.OF ADVANCEDCOMPUTING M. P. DEVANATH

53 C.A. No. 1013/2014XII-A

KOLLI SATYANARAYANA (SINCE DEAD)BY LRS. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusV. KESAVA RAO CHOWDARY (D) BY LRS..AND ORS. SRIDHAR POTARAJU[R-1]

54 C.A. No. 5666/2017III

RUNNING STAFF ASSOCIATION ANDORS. RANI CHHABRA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [R-2]

55 C.A. No. 3566/2010IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

List Before Appropriate Bench [released from Part-Heard] as per rp dated04.12.2019

ConnectedDiary No. 559-2019IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20640/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20646/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20643/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 599-2019IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18786/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.18787/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.18789/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3567/2010IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNTATAKA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2010IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL AND ORS. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2010IV-A

MANIKCHAND G.PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2010IV-A

PISTA DEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3569/2010IV-A

MANIKCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2010IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

Page 146: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3568/2010IV-A

BHAGUDEVI M AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR, [R-2], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedDiary No. 46890-2018IV-A

BHAGUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.2323/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.2806/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 549-2019IV-A

KAJUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20133/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20136/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20134/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 554-2019IV-A

KAJUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20186/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20187/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20188/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 562-2019IV-A

PISTADEVI AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]IA No.21404/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.21409/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.21406/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

56 Crl.A. No. 870/2010II-B

JAGJIT SINGH PRAGATI NEEKHRAVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 871/2010II-B

DILBHAJAN SINGH USHA NANDINI. V

VersusCBI CHANDIGARH ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

57 C.A. No. 5622/2009IX

CCE, AURANGABAD ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-1]VersusM/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[R-1]

58 Crl.A. No.1296-1297/2010II-A

PRABHULAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6],[P-7], [P-8]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

59 C.A. No. 8830/2012XII

RAMATHAL AND ORS. AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERVersusK.RAJAMANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRSAND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI

60 C.A. No.7236-7237/2009XVI

C.C.E.,KOLKATA III B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S.KALYANI SPINNING MILLS LTD. DAISY HANNAH[R-1]

Page 147: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

61 C.A. No. 5642/2009IX

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLTD. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENASHIK COMMISSIONERATE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 8060/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEVADODRA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S GAIL (INDIA) LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 806/2017IV-A

M/S. KOCHI REFINERIES LTD. (NOWFORMING PART OF BHARATPETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.)

PARIJAT SINHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4197-4199/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN EXC.& CUS-I,VADODARA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusOIL & NATURAL GAS COMMN.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8061-8062/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.VADODARA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S GAIL(I) LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8063-8069/2010III

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXC.& CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C.LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8025-8027/2010XVI

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.KOLKATA II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S INDIAN OIL CORP.LTD. E. C. AGRAWALAand FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 136589/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5686/2014XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusINDIAN OIL CORP. LTD THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.8219-8224/2017III

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,RAIGAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9838/2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECOIMBATORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLTD. PARIJAT SINHA[R-1][PR]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.57692/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.57688/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 3465/2018IV-A

M/S. KOCHI REFINERIES LIMITED PARIJAT SINHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

Page 148: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6READY FOR COURT.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5516/2019XVII-A

CCEX AND S. TAX PATNA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. I.O.C.L.IA No.89535/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.89537/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.89536/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

ConnectedDiary No. 3994-2019XVII-A

M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PATNA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.35662/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.35663/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.35665/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

62 C.A. No. 1878/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusA.SAINULABDIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1879/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORP. DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusP.D.OUSEPH PRASHANT PADMANABHAN[R-1]FOR ON IA 2/2012 : APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS

63 C.A. No.3053-3054/2010XVII-A

MR. PURANCHAND R. TANK DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR[P-1]

VersusM/S. ELECTRONICA MACHINE TOOLSLTD. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 7494/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]Versus

PRADYUMNA KUMAR PURI . AND ORS.RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], SHIBASHISHMISRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7495/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusMAHENDRA KUMAR SATPATHY ANDORS. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY, SHIBASHISH MISRA

65 C.A. No. 8313/2009IV-A

KRISHNA KUMARI SAURABH TRIVEDI[P-1]VersusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

66 C.A. No. 2857/2011IX

SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOLTRUST PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusTHE CHAIRMAN AND ANR. M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]RETAIN ITS POSITION

ConnectedC.A. No. 2858/2011IX

SHREE NASIK PANCHAVATIPANJARAPOLE TRUST AND ORS. PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-2]

67 C.A. No. 2225/2011IX

SANT BHAGWAN BABA SHIKSHANMANDAL THROUGH ITSSECRETARYSHAN MANDAL AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusGUNWANT AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR JHA[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]

Page 149: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

68 C.A. No.4840-4844/2011IV-A

M/S. RAMAPURAM HOLIDAY RESORTSETC. ETC. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.ETC.

V. N. RAGHUPATHYRAJESH MAHALE, [INT]

8/801 MM DTD. 11.02.2020ConnectedC.A. No. 4845/2011IV-A

M/S. SIDDHARTA RESORTS MEERA MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4847/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4846/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

69 C.A. No. 3271/2011III-A

M/S.SAMTEL COLOR LIMITED KAVITA JHA[P-1]VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2011III-A

M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTORSATISH K KAURA

KAVITA JHA

VersusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER., TRADETAX,NOIDA ZONE AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3273/2011III-A

M/S ELIN ELECTRONICS LTD.U.P.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGHCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30584/2015XI

J K LAKSHMI CEMENT LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) TRADE TAX . AND ANR. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

70 C.A. No. 4511/2010IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE CUSTOMS, MANGALRE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. PURE CHEMICAL LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 569/2012III

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS KANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No. 9354/2013XVI

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS KOLKATA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. KHAITAN & CO.[R-1]

71 Crl.A. No. 63/2011II-C

KRISHNAMURTHY SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

72 C.A. No. 4654/2012III-A

UTTARAKHAND JAL SANSTHAN THR.ITS SECRETARY KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

Page 150: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS.MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], SHWETAGARG[R-2], GUNNAM VENKATESWARARAO[R-3], SAURABH TRIVEDI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4655/2012III-A

D.D. DIMRI PARMANAND PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS. MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2]

73 C.A. No. 7118/2011XI-A

AKSHYA KUMAR MISHRA MONIKA GUSAINVersusAGRICULTURAL SCIENTISTRECRUITMENT BOARD CHAIRMAN ANDANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP, [R-2]

74 C.A. No. 7906/2010XV

MAHESH CHAND BARETH AND ANR. RISHI MATOLIYA[P-1], MUKUL KUMAR[P-1],GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

FOR ON IA 1/2015 FOR ON IA 2/2015 FOR ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 4/2015 FORON IA 5/2015 and IA No.10227/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 11332/2011XV

SURAJ MAL JAT AND ANR.

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FOR FOR ON IA 3/2013 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 87186/2017FOR impleading party ON IA 104886/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34742/2013XV

KUMARI SARITA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.FOR ON IA 4/2017 (Application for impleadment)

ConnectedC.A. No.9328-9331/2010XV

BRIJESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS ANDORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], SATPAL SINGH[R-23]

and IA No.14889/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ConnectedC.A. No. 8302/2010XV

DEVI PRASAD AND ORS AND ORS. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. RUCHI KOHLI, MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10281/2010XV

SARLA SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.SECRETARY AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2800-2802/2011XV

ARUNA PAREEK PARUL SHUKLA[P-7]

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.NIRMAL CHOPRA[R-1], SANDEEP KUMARJHA[R-1], RANBIR SINGH YADAV[R-1], MUKULKUMAR[R-1]

Page 151: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.2806-2808/2011XV

RAMANAND TANK AND ANR.

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2803/2011XV

GOVIND NARAYAN

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2804-2805/2011XV

KAILASH CHAND SAINI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8656-8668/2011XV

RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAT AND ORS.

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA, RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 2982/2011XV

DAYANAND KUMAWAT AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2980/2011XV

RAJ KUMARI SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2978/2011XV

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2979/2011XV

ANITA GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2981/2011XV

BHANWAR LAL KAHAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2921/2011XV

RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2976/2011XV

DILIP KUMAR CHOPDAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

Versus

Page 152: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2977/2011XV

RAJESH KUMAR NAMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3730/2011XV

MANSUKH RAY SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGHCHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4569/2011XV

MAMTA BANSAL AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3732/2011XV

MATADEEN MISHRA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5180/2011XV

MADHUSUDAN SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5183/2011XV

GIRDHARI LAL SHARMA AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1].

ConnectedC.A. No. 3731/2011XV

GOVIND SINGH TANWAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5182/2011XV

RUDMAL YADAV AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 7646/2011XV

HARENDRA SINGH AND ANR. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9618/2011XV

BHANA RAM

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10709/2011XV

BABU LAL SHARMA SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10712/2011XV

KRISHAN KANT KALAVATIA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Page 153: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 10711/2011XV

RAM GOPAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10710/2011XV

YOGESHWARI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6898/2012XV

SURENDRA SINGH NIRWAN P. K. JAIN

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1668/2012XV

MAHESH CHAND SAINI BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1038/2012XV

JITENDRA SINGH PARMAR AND ORS. PARUL SHUKLA[P-8], [P-9], [P-11], [P-12],[P-13], [P-23], [P-24], [P-25], [P-26]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11442/2011XV

SHIMBUDAYAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11407/2011XV

RAMKARAN GURJAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1210/2012XV

BHAGIRATH MAL THALOR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4559/2012XV

SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6096-6104/2012XV

GAJENDRA GAUR & ORS.ETC.ETC. ANDANR. AJAY CHOUDHARY

VersusGAJENDRA GAUR .ETC.ETC. AND ORS. MUKUL KUMAR, MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8661/2012XV

PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. PARUL SHUKLA[P-1], [P-2], [P-2]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34663/2013XV

GHISA RAM MALI AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 322/2013XV

BALDEV SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. RAKESH DAHIYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

75 C.A. No. 7470/2011XII

ANIL AND SUNIL TRADERS AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]Versus

Page 154: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

T.L.PRASAD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-1]

76 C.A. No. 6942/2011XIV-A

THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARVersusR.K.KAPOOR RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6943-6949/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANIL KUMAR MEHRA RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6950-6954/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CHETAN KUMAR RAJPUT AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

77 C.A. No. 2477/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]ANIL KATIYAR[I-7][IMPL][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2476/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10570/2018III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR

VersusSAMARTH NARAIN AND ORS. VIVEK KISHORE[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

78 Crl.A. No. 1755/2011II-A

HARIBHAU @ BHAUSAHEB DINKARKHARUSE AND ANR. K. N. RAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]HEARING EXPEDITED.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.150-151/2013II-A

SUBHASH RAGHUNATH PAWAR K. N. RAI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY

79 Crl.A. No. 1241/2011II

MD. YAKUB SHAREEF VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLUVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 57/2012II

SIDDAM RAJAIAH V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSYED YAKUB PASHA S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

80 C.A. No.8608-8609/2011XIV-A

KRISHAN MURARI AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR, BINAY KUMAR DAS[P-2]

VersusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

81 C.A. No. 7483/2011XVII-A

GULSHAN KUMAR MENDIRATTA . ANDORS. SAURABH MISHRA

Versus

Page 155: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6UNION OF INDIA INDIAN RAILWAYSTHROUGH GENERAL MANAGER ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

82 C.A. No. 9851/2014XI-A

CHEMA MALLICK C. V. SUBBA RAO[P-1]Versus

MIR AYUBA ALI AND ORS. S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

83 C.A. No. 297/2012XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6]

VersusSHRI ONKAR SINGH SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

84 C.A. No. 4410/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]VersusSURESH KUMAR SINGH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]

85 C.A. No. 1077/2013XVII-A

M/S. ISNAR AQUA FARMS C. K. RAI, PRAMIT SAXENA[P-1]VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

86 Crl.A. No. 155/2014II-A

DEO RAI MOHIT KUMAR SHAHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

87 C.A. No. 8634/2012XIV-A

SUSHIL SHARMA DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

88 C.A. No.11302-11303/2016XIV-A

RUPESH KUMAR MEENA S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], PRIYA PURI[R-3]

89 C.A. No. 5326/2013XII

CHAIRMANVersus

M.GOPALKRISHNAN . AND ORS. S. RAVI SHANKAR, HIMANSHU MUNSHI,[CAVEAT], G. INDIRA

90 C.A. No. 801/2014XV

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusINDRA RAJ SINGH ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-1]

91 Crl.A. No. 457/2012II

GUDIPALLI SIDDHARTHA REDDY G. N. REDDY[P-1]VersusSTATE C.B.I. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.894-895/2012II

SAROJINI DEVI P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

CBI CBI AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, G. N. REDDY[R-2]

92 C.A. No. 6027/2014XVI

SAMIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], PLR CHAMBERSAND CO.[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

93 C.A. No.4788-4790/2012III-A

SANJAY SHARMA AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], SHRISH KUMARMISRA[R-2]

94 C.A. No. 4829/2012XVII-A

MILTON ROY INDIA PVT. LTD SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusR.P. RAJARAJAN ENTERPRISES ROHINI MUSA

Page 156: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 695 C.A. No. 6688/2016

III-ASHIV SHANKARLAL SRIVASTAVA MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN

96 C.A. No. 8242/2013IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusVIJENDER PRAKASH GAUTAM VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

97 C.A. No. 6987/2014XII

R. RAJMOHAN P. SOMA SUNDARAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE ADDL. CHIEF SEC. TO GOVT. . ANDORS.

98 C.A. No. 2325/2013XVI

LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA . ANDORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

VersusRAJEEV LOHIA AMIT PAWAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6043/2013XI-A

L.I.C.OF INDIA AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusSRIKANTA MOHAPATRA AND ANR. PARIJAT SINHA, PUNAM KUMARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6044/2013XI-A

SR.DIV.MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA . ANDANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusTRIPATI PANDA SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4860/2017XI-A

VINCEN MATHEW V. SHYAMOHAN

VersusLIFE INSUREANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Ready as per Ld. Registrar Order dt.19.11.2018.99 C.A. No. 2066/2014

IVSATISH KUMAR AND ANR. RAVI PANWAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]LIST AFTER FOUR WEEKS.

100 C.A. No. 5459/2013XVII-A

ASSAM BROOK LTD ABHIJEET SINHAVersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTDAND ANR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA[R-1], [R-2]

101 Crl.A. No. 898/2014II-A

PRAFULLA PREMDAS MOREY SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedDiary No. 42217-2018II-A

MANJU@ ANIL PREMDAS MOREY MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAONLY FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 176791/2018

102 Crl.A. No. 223/2014II-B

PATEL DANABHAI KANABHAI AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

103 Crl.A. No.1338-1339/2015II-B

PARAMJIT SINGH KANG LAW ASSOCIATES

VersusGURWINDER SINGH SAMRA AND ORS. ANURADHA MUTATKAR, , [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1341-1342/2015II-B

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Versus

Page 157: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6DR. GURWINDER SINGH SAMRA ANDANR. BALRAJ DEWAN[R-2]

104 Crl.A. No. 2013/2014II-B

BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR. AJAY PAL[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 305/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S. EDWARD LIFE SCIENCES(I)PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

SONAL JAIN[R-1]

106 C.A. No. 9686/2014XII

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONREP. BY ITS SECRETARY BINU TAMTA

VersusM. MAHALAKSHMI

107 C.A. No.5655-5656/2014XIV-A

MAHENDRA SINGH RAVINDRA BANA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GHANSHYAM JOSHI[CAVEAT]

108 C.A. No. 8967/2014XIV-A

INDIAN FOREIGNSERVICE(B)GAZETTED OFFICERSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-3]

109 C.A. No.8629-8630/2014XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusJOGESHWAR SWAIN KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1]

110 C.A. No. 7758/2014III-A

STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusYOGESH CHANDRA GAUTAM AND ANR. SUSHIL BALWADA[R-1]

111 C.A. No. 9084/2017XVII-A

HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGESPVT.LTD. RAJIV TYAGI

VersusPURUSHOTTAM GAUR AND ANR. ANDANR.

112 C.A. No. 6641/2015XVI

U.O.I.. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusASIT KUMAR DAS VIPIN KUMAR JAI[CAVEAT], SARLA CHANDRA

113 C.A. No. 631/2016III

ATUL S/O ARVIND CHIVHE AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE, [R-8],SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 634/2016III

SAMBHAJI VISHNUPANT KOLI . ANDORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

114 C.A. No. 7107/2014XV

J.S. PARMAR PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

115 C.A. No. 4269/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURIVersusRAM CHANDER PANDEY ANURAG PANDEY[CAVEAT]

Page 158: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.4270-4271/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

SAILENDRA SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA

116 Crl.A. No. 437/2015II-C

ANEES V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[P-1]VersusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

117 C.A. No. 8744/2015XII

CHAIRMAN, CHENNAI PORT TRUSTAND ANR. SUSMITA LAL

VersusA KANNABIRAN VINODH KANNA B.

118 C.A. No. 4200/2015III-A

THE STATE OF UP AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]VersusNEERAJ CHAUBEY AND ORS. K.PARAMESHWAR[R-1][ IMMEDIATELY AFTER FRESH MATTERS ]

119 Crl.A. No. 921/2015II-C

DARSHAN KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1][GR]FOR FINAL DISPOSAL VIDE ORDER DATED 07.07.2020.

120 C.A. No.13999-14000/2015XII

KAILASH BEN T. SOLANGI AND ETCAND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. REP. BYTHE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRYAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM, BINU TAMTA

121 C.A. No. 21854/2017III

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]Versus

DR. S.J. KAMBLE AND ORS.VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], DUAASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-5]

122 Crl.A. No. 1421/2015II-C

NAND LAL AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1422/2015II-C

PALTAN JANGDE VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1470/2017II-C

CHARANDAS JANGDE . AND ORS. JAIL PETITION[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]Mr. Shailendra Tiwary, Adv, Amicus Curiae

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.6134-6135/2019II-C

TULSI JANGDE AND ORS. RENJITH. B[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]

Versus

THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION

123 C.A. No.5622-5623/2015XII

S. NANDHIVARMAN GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1]

Versus

J. KUMARAN AND ORS. ETC. AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1], GAUTAMNARAYAN[R-4], [R-4], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-6]

124 T.C.(C) No. 78/2015XVI-A

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]Versus

Page 159: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6

SURAJ SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

LIZ MATHEW[R-3], AMITA SINGHKALKAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-12], [R-13], [R-15], [R-20], [R-21], [R-24],[R-29], [R-33], [R-35], [R-39], [R-40], [R-42],[R-44]

125 Crl.A. No. 1007/2017II-B

MANJINDER KAUR ALIAS BHOLI SANJAY JAINVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1006/2017II-B

RACHHPAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

126 C.A. No. 15140/2017XVI

KISHORE KUMAR RAI MUSHTAQ AHMAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 675/2015X

AMRENDRA KUMAR THAKUR MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15141/2017XVI

DIN BANDHU PATHAK AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. THESECRETARY AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 665/2015X

HARI SHANKAR PRASAD SINGH KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15142/2017XVI

SUDHIR CHANDRA PATHAK AND ORS. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORSTHROUGH ROAD CONSTRUCTIONDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15143/2017XVI

BRIJANANDAN SINGH AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15144/2017XVI

BIPIN KUMAR SINHA AND ANR. SMARHAR SINGH, [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR STATE OF BIHARAND ORS. THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

and IA No.92089/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.127 Crl.A. No. 1619/2015

II-AASHOK SARAF AND ORS. KUNAL VERMAVersusSANTOSHI MISHRA AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY

128 C.A. No. 2680/2016IV-A

C.G. SUPRASANNA RASHMI NANDAKUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. HRISHIKESH BARUAH

129 C.A. No. 3583/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAJU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[R-8]

Page 160: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 3584/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD NAPIT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4613/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

Versus

PRABHU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-1], [R-2],[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], SHALU SHARMA[R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3585/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSANJAY KUMAR SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4615/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusNARESH SURANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3588/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAVINDRA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3586/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSATYA NARAYAN SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4614/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

VersusBABU LAL PRAJAPAT AND ORS. ANDORS. SHALU SHARMA, [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4617/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusPRATAP RAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4619/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusMAHENDRA PAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4618/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORSAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusPADAM SINGH AND ORS AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4621/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusBHAGIRATH SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4461/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSHYAM LAL AND ANR. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4462/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusTULCHA RAM SINGARIA

Page 161: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 4616/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusHEENA JOSHI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4463/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.AND ANR. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPREETAM SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4620/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusANAND PATEL AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4623/2016XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusMANEESH SAINI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4624/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusOM PRAKASH SHARMA

130 C.A. No.8859-8860/2016XI-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL, ALL INDIA RADIO ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

Versus

PURUSHOTHAMAN C. AND ORS. ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

SHREE PAL SINGH[R-1], P. SOMASUNDARAM[R-1], BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH[R-1],NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-29], [R-30], [R-31],[R-32], [R-33], [R-34], [R-35], [R-36], [R-37],[R-38], [R-39], [R-40], [R-41], [R-42], [R-43],[R-44], [R-45], [R-46], [R-47], [R-48], [R-49],[R-50], [R-51]YADAV NARENDER SINGH[IMPL], VIVEKSHARMA[IMPL], RAVI PANWAR[IMPL],MUKESH KUMAR SINGH AND CO.[IMPL],DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[IMPL]

FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 27939/2017 FOR [I/A FOR IMPLEADMENT,DIRECTION INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 40752/2017 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 45724/2017 and IA No.125610/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.125612/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.125616/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.125617/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.32793/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 22646-2018XVI-A

PRASAR BHARTI BROADCASTINGCORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5]

VersusSHAFEEQ AHMAD SOFI AND ORS.IA No.92636/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.92638/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

131 C.A. No. 4071/2016XIV-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ANDORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK

VersusSUBHASH CHAND GUPTA RANI CHHABRA

132 C.A. No. 8212/2016XVII-A

M/S. RAUNAQ ICE AND COLD STORAGE M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. . ANDANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

133 C.A. No.12174-12176/2018XVII-A

FARMERS SERVICE COOP.SOCIETY LTD.(COMMON IN ALL MATTERS) SRIDHAR POTARAJU

Versus

Page 162: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6AGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO OFINDIA FORMERLY KNOWN AS GENERALINSURANCE COOPERATION OF INDIA(FORMERLY

TUHIN, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.12177-12187/2018XVII-A

MANAGER, AGRICULTURE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ETC. ETC. PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK

Versus

AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANYOF INDIA LTD. . AND ORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[R-1], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

134 C.A. No. 7121/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAYVersusMAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYKARANJAWALA & CO.[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 20878/2017XVII-A

MAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7157/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYYASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[INT]

ConnectedDiary No. 16863-2017XVII-A

MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

135 Crl.A. No.2017-2019/2017II-A

JAI PRAKASH KUNWAR SHISHIR PINAKI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], FAUZIASHAKIL[R-3]

136 C.A. No.9938-9939/2016III

MOHD. JALILUDDIN MOHAMMEDMUKTARUDDIN ASHUTOSH DUBEY

VersusAL-FAROOQUI SOCIAL ANDEDUCATIONAL SOCIETY - JALNA ANDORS.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED

137 Crl.A. No. 1846/2017II

RAJ KUMAR YADAV VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1], AMIT PAWAN[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

138 Crl.A. No. 17/2017II-A

PRAMOD TIWARY AND ANR. SHANTANU SAGAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

139 C.A. No.4722-4723/2017XI-A

TAPAN KUMAR BARIK ANKUR SOOD[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], KIRAN KUMAR PATRA[R-5]

140 C.A. No. 1080/2017III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

Page 163: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 6141 C.A. No. 20841/2017

III-APRATHAMA BANK AND ORS. ALDANISH REINVersusVED PRAKASH CHAUHAN ANIL K. CHOPRA

142 C.A. No. 5697/2017XVII

COAL INDIA LIMITED S. S. SHROFF[P-1]VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR AND ANR.

RISHAD AHMED CHOWDHURY[R-1], HIRENDASAN[R-2]

LIST FOR FINAL DISPOSAL VIDE COURT'S ORDER DATED 18.02.2019

143 C.A. No.2827-2829/2018XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

ROHIT NATHAN AND ANR.HARSH PARASHAR[CAVEAT], PRATEEK KCHADHA[R-1], [INT]SIDDHARTHA JHA[INT], HIMALAWRENCE[INT][PR]

[ TOP OF THE BOARD ]......[RETAIN ITS POSITION]ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 381/2020X

RAJESH KUMAR YADAV DEEPAK GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.6723-6734/2020XIV

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

KETAN AND ORS. HIMA LAWRENCE[CAVEAT]PARMANAND GAUR[IMPL]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.41362/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.41365/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.41364/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

144 C.A. No. 1942/2019III-A

HARIDAS VERMA K. N. RAIVersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OFDISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.AND ANR.

AAKARSH KAMRA[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2]

145 Crl.A. No. 1263/2018II

ANIL KUMAR PRIYANJALI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.57100/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:02:19

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 164: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

NOTE:-ON 09.09.2020

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 1844/2010

IV-AH.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]VersusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1845/2010IV-A

H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBARAO[R-3]

2 C.A. No. 5910/2009XII

K.RAKKIANNA GOUNDER K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNA B.[R-2]

3 C.A. No. 6077/2009IV-A

GURUWARI BAI SATISH PANDEY[P-1]VersusJAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1]

4 C.A. No. 2892/2009III-A

GIRIJA PRASAD TIWARI (D) THR. LRS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]Versus

RAMAPATI TIWARI (DEAD) AND ORS. AJIT SINGH PUNDIR[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3]

5 C.A. No.6721-6722/2009III

CHAMPALAL JAVANTRAJ SHETH E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2][GR], [R-3][GR],[R-11][GR], [R-12][GR], [R-13][GR], MINAKSHIVIJ[R-4], [R-18], [R-20], RASHMISINGHANIA[R-8], SHEELA GOEL[R-9],ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[R-16], NACHIKETAJOSHI[R-6], [R-19], T. MAHIPAL[R-5], [R-7],[R-17], [R-28], [R-29], [R-30], [R-31]

FOR ON IA 96406/2009

6 C.A. No. 1330/2010XI-A

THE LAW SECRETARY . LAW (B)DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA ANDORS.

G. PRAKASH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusK.P.GEORGE A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

7 C.A. No. 6157/2013XIV-A

MAHANT SURENDRA NATH SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-2], BINUTAMTA[R-3]

Page 165: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 78 C.A. No. 9472/2010

XIIA.SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR. G. BALAJIVersusR.PANNERSELVAM E. R. SUMATHY

9 C.A. No. 7230/2012XIV-A

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION AND ANR. HIMANSHU TYAGI[P-1], VINOD SHARMA[P-2]

VersusHIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION RETIRED EMPLOYEESUNION

PRIYA PURI, [R-1]

10 C.A. No. 4394/2010XIV-A

BOLORAM BORDOLOI RAJIV MEHTA[P-1]VersusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK . AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-5]

11 C.A. No.5800-5801/2017XII-A

YARLAGADDA PARTHASARADHI K. SARADA DEVI

VersusYARLAGADDA TULASAMMA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

12 C.A. No. 5167/2010IV

KHUSHI RAM AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusNAWAL SINGH AND ORS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

13 C.A. No. 1083/2012XII

T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. ANDORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusK.SUBRAMAIAM S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1084/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusM.RANGANATHAN(DEAD) THROUGHLRS MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1085/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusA.CYRIL ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-1]

14 C.A. No. 9493/2010III

KAMLABEN(D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2],[P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 4020/2010III-A

U.P.HSG. AND DEVELOPMENT BOARDAND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusNAMIT SHARMA PRASHANT KUMAR

16 Crl.A. No. 1078/2010II-A

SURENDRA BANGALI @ S.S. ROUTELE PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ABHISHEK[R-1]

17 Crl.A. No. 1050/2010II-C

SATBIR SINGH @ GATTU D. N. GOBURDHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT.OF N.C.T.OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

18 Crl.A. No. 1008/2010II-C

R.DAMODARAN S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

19 C.A. No.8721-8722/2010XI-A

KERALA REVENUE VILLAGE STAFFORGANISATION (KRVSO),REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

Page 166: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 720 C.A. No. 8163/2009

IVTEK CHAND JAGRATI SINGH[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5862/2012XIV-A

SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B. K.SATIJA[R-5], [R-8], JAGRATI SINGH[R-4], [R-6],[R-7]

21 Crl.A. No. 361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHI[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

22 C.A. No.4616-4618/2010IV

JAGMOHAN SINGH DHILLON ETC.ETC. D. MAHESH BABU

VersusSATWANT SINGH AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-5]

23 Crl.A. No. 1910/2010II-A

BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANR. K. L. JANJANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

24 Crl.A. No. 1533/2011II-A

SHRIKRISHNA AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

25 Crl.A. No. 1889/2011II-B

HAMSA @ HAMMED HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

26 Crl.A. No. 1404/2010II-A

SHRINIWAS TRIPATHI M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

27 C.A. No. 3034/2012XII

RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]VersusRAMULU AMMAL SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[R-1]

28 C.A. No.2037-2038/2010XI-A

ITTY P. K. MANOHAR

VersusIVY ABRAHAM AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

29 C.A. No.5199-5201/2011XIV-A

UNMUKT BHATNAGAR AND ORS. KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]

Versus

MANOJ BHATNAGAR (D) BY LRS.. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1.2], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1]

30 Crl.A. No. 2004/2010II

HIMMATA RAM MUKUL KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

31 C.A. No.9998-10009/2011III

AMRUTBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER .AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26807/2015III

LASIBEN JIVANJI THROUGH HERPOWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

Page 167: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26833/2015III

THAKOR PAPATJI GABHAJI THROUGHHIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26300/2015III

PATEL DASHRATHLAL RAMANLAL SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LTD AND ANR.

32 C.A. No. 3876/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L.JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC[R-1], PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], K. L.JANJANI[R-1], EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3872/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3873/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3875/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3871/2017XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2],[R-3], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-4], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-10], K. L. JANJANI[R-11], [R-12],[R-13]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3882/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3883/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3877/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3881/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

Page 168: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7THE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, K. L. JANJANI, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3878/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, PRATIBHA JAIN, K.L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3880/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-5], [R-6], ROHIT K.SINGH[R-2]

33 Crl.A. No. 2251/2010II-C

FEDRICK CUTINHA S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2265/2010II-C

KRISHNAPPA @ KITTU NAIKA N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

34 C.A. No. 7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

35 C.A. No. 550/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY ANDORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

PRAHALAD KUMAR AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 551/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

AMAR SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.

SONAL JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-19], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[R-8],[R-18]

ConnectedC.A. No. 552/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusGRAM UDYOG SANSTHAN THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN BHAGWAN DAS (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 8/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 9/2015 FORAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 88370/2019 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 88371/2019 FOR SETTING ASIDEAN ABATEMENT ON IA 88372/2019 FOR APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT ONIA 88374/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 553/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 169: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7MAHESH CHAND AND ANR. AMIT DAYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 555/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusM/S BHARAT LIME INDUSTRY AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1]

36 C.A. No. 8070/2010IV-A

GOVT. TOOL ROOM AND TRAININGCENTRE S. N. BHAT[P-1]

VersusH.N. YOGA RAJAN AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

37 Crl.A. No. 811/2011II-C

NAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHA VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersusTHE STATE THROUGH SUB INSPECTOROF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

38 Crl.A. No. 1380/2012II-A

MD. ASLAM JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[R-1]Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Advocate is NOR Amicus curiae

39 C.A. No. 4749/2011XII

P.P.RATHI V. BALACHANDRANVersusARULMIGU MALLIGESWARARTHIRUKOIL AND ORS. AND ORS. R. SATHISH

40 Crl.A. No.1663-1664/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRADEEP MISRA[R-1], ANKUR YADAV[R-2],YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-4], [R-5], [R-6],EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-8], [R-9],[R-10]

ONLY IA No.110881/2017- APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FOR VACATION OFSTAY TO BE LISTED IN CRL.A. NO. 1663-64/2015 ONLY ON 01.05.2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1665-1666/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

RIZWAN . AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA[R-2], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1667-1668/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

BADRUDDIN . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3],PRADEEP MISRA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1669/2015II

ANIL KUMAR DHAKA RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1670/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

WASEEM AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

41 C.A. No.1137-1138/2011IV

ZILE SINGH ETC. AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

CHATTER SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, VINOD SHARMA[R-1.4],[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1], [R-8.3], [R-8.2], [R-8.1],[R-8.6], [R-8.5], [R-8.4]

Page 170: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 742 Crl.A. No. 2418/2010

II-CC.VILVANATHAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

43 Crl.A. No. 2035/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNIRBHAY SINGH IRSHAD AHMAD[R-2]

44 C.A. No. 7580/2012XI-A

PRAKASAN M.P.. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

45 C.A. No. 10766/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

NANWA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[R-1], SUDHIRKULSHRESHTHA[R-2]

46 Crl.A. No. 191/2011II-C

K.RAJENDRAN V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

47 C.A. No.1869-1871/2018XII

BALASUNDARAM AND ORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]

VersusRAMALINGAM AND ORS. AND ORS.ADVOCATE NAME: MR. VIPIN NAIR(FOR PETITIONER)

48 C.A. No. 97-98/2012XIV-A

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURALRESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTORGENERAL AND ANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

RAJINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-9]

49 C.A. No. 11196/2011IV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusA.G.D. REDDY S. N. BHAT

50 Crl.A. No. 233/2013II-B

BISHNUPADA DUTTA AND ANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 3927/2018XII-A

G. MADHUSUDHANA PRASAD AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR], [P-6][PR], [P-7][PR],[P-8][PR], [P-9][PR], [P-10][PR], [P-11][PR],[P-12][PR], [P-13][PR], [P-14][PR], [P-15][PR],[P-16][PR], [P-17][PR], [P-18][PR], [P-19][PR],[P-20][PR], [P-21][PR]

Versus

M. LAKXMIKANT AND ORS.G. N. REDDY[R-1], [R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3930/2018XII-A

N. VIJAY KUMAR C. K. RAI[P-1]

Versus

G. MOHAN REDDY AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-6],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3928/2018XII-A

P.V.RAMAPATHI RAO AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1]

Page 171: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3929/2018XII-A

M.B. HEMLATHA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M. LAXMIKANTH AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3931/2018XII-A

K.ANANTHA REDDY AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][PR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1],[R-2], [R-2], ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3932/2018XII-A

M.PENCHALA RAJU AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

M.LAXMIKANTH AND ORS.G. N. REDDY, SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[R-1], C.S. N. MOHAN RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]

FOR ON IA 11/2014 (Application for impleadment FILED BY MR. C.S.N. MOHANRAO)

52 C.A. No. 6640/2013III-A

VIKAS JAINVersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

53 C.A. No. 3795/2012XII

AROCKIAMARY AND ORS. AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusKULANDAIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

54 C.A. No. 11341/2013XIV-A

SHANKAR KUMAR T. L. GARGVersusRAM NARAIN AND ANR. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

55 C.A. No.5785-5788/2011III-A

SHAUKAT NARESH KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. . AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

56 C.A. No. 652/2019XII

S.GAJAGANAPATHY RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD) THR LRSAND ORS AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 653/2019XII

SHANKAR P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/201257 Crl.A. No. 1627/2013

II-BMAHENDRABHAI NATHABHAI RAVAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 6213/2016IV

TRUST MANDIR THAKUR RAMLACCHAMN JI MAHRAJ ARJUN SINGH BHATI

Versus

PURAN (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI,KRISHAN KUMAR, SHILPA SINGH[R-5]

59 Crl.A. No. 1265/2012II-C

T.G.KRISHNAMURTHY. AND ORS. AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKATHROUGHTARIKERE POLICE AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

60 C.A. No. 5859/2012IV

OM PRAKASH AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersus

Page 172: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

61 C.A. No. 356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4578/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101664/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4583/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101644/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4577/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4582/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4585/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7567/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TAX CBUILDING AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7566/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6464/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3547/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3705/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 173: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3703/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3804/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3789/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3624/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101667/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4584/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9949/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101686/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11727/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101675/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedC.A. No. 361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 357/2015IV-A

M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 366-367/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 174: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 358-360/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 374-376/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 368-373/2015IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 380/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 381/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 386/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 389/2015IV-A

M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7558/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19939/2015IV-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3505/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

Page 175: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26688/2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LIMITED RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.165232/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2253/2020IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.879/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.880/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURINGTHE DEFECTS

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7854/2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 10 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LIMITED RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42708/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

62 C.A. No. 9289/2013III

B.P. SINGH RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

63 Crl.A. No. 1179/2012II-B

NARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1][SCLSC]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 1537/2016XII

R.JANKIAMMAL VIKAS MEHTAVersus

S.K.KUMARASWAMY (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, S. RAVI SHANKAR,PRABHA SWAMI, K. V. MOHAN, PALLAVILANGAR[R-2], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1538/2016XII

S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR, GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusS.K.KUJMARASWAMY (D) THRU LRS. .AND ORS. AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, VIKAS MEHTA, K.V. MOHAN

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR [BRINGING ON RECORD LRS] ON IA 90850/201865 C.A. No. 6610/2015

XVILAKHAN SAO(D) THR. HIS L.RS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

PARWATI DEVI . AND ORS. BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA, SUBHASISHBHOWMICK

66 Crl.A. No. 759/2013II-B

SAMABHAI RAMSUBHAI KISHORI MANISHA T. KARIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 LIST THE MATTER AFTERVACATION

67 Crl.A. No.905-908/2013II

NANHE SINGH . AND ORS. KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIAand IA No.88592/2017-I/A FOR BAIL and IA No.88596/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.126819/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.16996/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

68 C.A. No.10423-10424/2017IV-A

H.M.SHIVANNA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR.AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY,VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

Page 176: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7IA NO. 152152/2019(FOR DIRECTION) IN CA 10423-24/2017 ONLY TO BE LISTEDBEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT

69 Crl.A. No. 1290/2012II

MAHAVEER SINGH MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

70 C.A. No. 11161/2017IV-A

GURUSHANTAYYA ANIL KUMARVersusGOURAVVA AND ORS. TULIKA PRAKASH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

ConnectedC.A. No. 11162/2017IV-A

NEELAKANTAYYA TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusGURUSHANTAYYA AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, AFTAB ALI KHAN

71 Crl.A. No.148-151/2014II

ANJUM KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETRY

P. NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-1]

72 C.A. No. 5921/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]Versus

K. KAJNA . AND ORS. P. NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-1]

73 C.A. No. 15150/2017XIV-A

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

MUKUT RANJAN SARMA . AND ORS.

SHAILESH MADIYAL, [R-6], [R-7], [R-10],[R-11], RAHUL PRATAP[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40]

74 C.A. No.6776-6777/2013III

KAZI AKILODDIN HIMANSHU CHAUBEY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21611/2018IX

KAZI AKILODDIN SUJAODDIN HIMANSHU CHAUBEY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 111846/2018 FOR PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 186395/2019 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 186396/2019

75 C.A. No. 8772/2013III

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusDINESH RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-1], [R-2]

76 Crl.A. No. 1122/2017II-A

NANDESHWAR KUMAR SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]Versus

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY AND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-6]

77 C.A. No. 9884/2013XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASIVersusK. BHANAMMA VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

ConnectedC.A. No. 9885/2013XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1]

Versus

Page 177: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7P.M.ANTONY VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33132/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSAJITHA P.M. . AND ANR.

78 W.P.(C) No. 984/2013PIL-W

TELANGANA VIKAS KENDRA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 289/2014PIL-W

P.R. KRISHNAN AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3], [R-4],ASWATHI M.K.[R-5], SUMEET LALL[R-6],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-7], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-8], ANINDITA PUJARI[R-9],UTTARA BABBAR[R-10], RUCHI KOHLI[R-11],GOPAL SINGH[R-12], RAJIV NANDA[R-13],PARIJAT SINHA[R-14]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 210/2014PIL-W

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 271/2014PIL-W

K.K SHERWANI R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1471/2017XII-A

D.SURAYANARAYANA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusGOVT. OF INIDA SUSHMA SURI, D. BHARATHI REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 456/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 344/2014PIL-W

BANDI SREEKANTH & 3 ORS CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 470/2014PIL-W

DR.M.SHARATH CHANDRA REDDY VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 166/2014PIL-W

M. RAJAMOHAN REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 275/2014PIL-W

B. SANJEEVA RAO PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

Page 178: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 306/2014PIL-W

CHANAMOLU LAKSHMI ANUPAMA ANDORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 742/2014PIL-W

HARITHA SARANGA AND ORS. AND ORS. V. K. MONGA

VersusUNION OF INDIA GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 804/2014PIL-W

MUTTEEVI VENKATAPPA LAKSHMI ANDORS. P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 132/2018PIL-W

PONGULETI SUDHAKAR REDDY D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-4], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-5], [R-6], ANIL KATIYAR[R-7], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-8], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-9]AMIT K. NAIN[IMPL]APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[INT]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 203/2014PIL-W

M. GOPI KRISHNA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI, CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 215/2014PIL-W

PENDURTHI VENKATESH A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIAB. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 211/2014PIL-W

KARNATAKA TELUGU PRAJA SAMITHI NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

U.O.I. AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 217/2014PIL-W

MATTEGUNTA RAMAKRISHNA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 218/2014PIL-W

K. PRABHAKAR RAJU AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 219/2014PIL-W

VUNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 223/2014PIL-W

MUPPALLA SUBBARAO AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

Page 179: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 224/2014PIL-W

RASTHRIYA PRAJA CONGRESS(SECULAR) A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 225/2014PIL-W

RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 228/2014PIL-W

NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY ANDORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 230/2014PIL-W

MATTA JAYAKAR AND ANR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 207/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1], CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], AMIT SHARMA[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR ON IA 7/2017 and IA No.86398/2017-impleading partyand IA No.86412/2017-PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW AN IA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 161/2014PIL-W

K. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU ANDANR. N. RAJARAMAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

Office Report for Directions

79 Crl.A. No.278-279/2016II-A

BHUNESHWAR YADAV AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],NIRANJANA SINGH[R-3]

80 C.A. No. 7364/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]Versus

SHYAMA NANDAN MISHRA SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1], AKHILESHKUMAR PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7371/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SARWAR AKRAM KHAN AND ORS. SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], DIVYA ROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7373/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusKARUNESH KUMAR AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7365/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SUBHAS CHANDRA SINGH SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

Page 180: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 7368/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAYA TIWARY DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7374/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusPRABIN CHANDRA SINGH SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 5943/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHMEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THR.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. OM PRAKASH AGGARWAL

82 Crl.A. No.2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SUBHROSANYAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

83 C.A. No. 6815/2014III-A

U.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA

84 Crl.A. No. 1856/2014II-C

RAHIL AND ANR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 927/2015II-C

SURAIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusSTATE OF (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OFDELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

85 Crl.A. No. 1039/2015II-B

OM PARKASH SINGH ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

86 C.A. No. 9735/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

VARSHA VINOD SAYAM AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 9734/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

NANDA WAKDE AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

87 C.A. No. 1443/2017XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. PIYUSH SHARMA[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusIDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER

88 Crl.A. No. 334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Page 181: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7

89 Crl.A. No. 106/2018II-C

MALTI @ K.S. PRIYA @ SHANTI @PREMKUMARI AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

90 C.A. No. 9879/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDIVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

MATTER RESTORE BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ON 15.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No.9880-9886/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.9887-9891/2017XV

INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARYAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR

91 C.A. No. 5780/2015XV

IRSHAD(D)THROUGH LRS. SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSHARAFAT HUSSAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

92 Crl.A. No. 828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

93 Crl.A. No. 1203/2015II-B

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

94 C.A. No. 132/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 136/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 139/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 182: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 141/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHIVersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KATIYAR, , ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2668/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4412/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 17811/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22239/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134327/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.134329/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.134326/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15803/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDIA No.94691/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1775/2020XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1632/2020XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA LIMTIED

ConnectedDiary No. 7356-2020XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 183: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7M/S AVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT.LTD.FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 41803/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 137/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA102664/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20829/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76573/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17094/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 135/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 151/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 148/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5909/2016XIV-A

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5904/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 21852/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 19984/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1826/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.IA No.14992/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 184: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedDiary No. 10952-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4652/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 13295-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55855/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55856/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20837/2018XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD DIRECTOR TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.86519/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2669/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 144/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 146/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3937/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 149/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 521/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 527/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 526/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD. POOJA DHAR

Page 185: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 152/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 1219/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2703/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4808/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 5024/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4809/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5905-5906/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5903/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6485/2016XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3953/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3954/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.11110-11111/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARand FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 119430/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5514/2017XIV-A

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 186: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7M/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8403/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVTLTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11201/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 15498/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.13384-13385/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA64556/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 9624/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXALWAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118233/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA118234/2018

95 C.A. No. 10433/2016III

SMT. SUSHILABAI TUKARAM PATIL ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL

VersusSUBHASH KAKASAHEB PATIL . ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

96 Crl.A. No.1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICESTATON INCHARGE AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMOL B. KARANDE[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAJKUMAR

97 Crl.A. No.1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEY[R-1]MR. MAHABIR SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE TOASSIST THE HON. COURT IN THE INSTANT MATTER

Page 187: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7

98 C.A. No.21828-21831/2017XII

M.R. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NADUHIGHWAYS ENGINEERS AND ORS. ETC.

PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3][GR]

99 Crl.A. No. 616/2016II

DHARAMPAL AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1], FARRUKHRASHEED[R-1]

and IA No.7690/2018-BAIL APPLICATION100 C.A. No. 7257/2016

III-AVIPIN KUMAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY . AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7258/2016III-A

SHRAVAN KUMAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],VINAY GARG[R-4]

and IA No.105549/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.101 C.A. No. 6122/2016

XVISAHID ALIM AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANDORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

102 C.A. No. 7397/2016III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusGAJENDRA TEWARI ANURAG KISHORE[R-1]

103 Crl.A. No. 44/2017II-C

MOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

104 Crl.A. No. 1078/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusRAMESH ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1]

105 Crl.A. No. 1229/2017II-C

CHAMAN LAL RADHIKA GAUTAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1][GR]HEARING EXPEDITED VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 21.07.2018 AND04.07.2018.FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS AND DISPOSAL VIDE HON'BLE COURT'SORDER DATED 04.07.2018.

106 C.A. No. 4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1]

107 C.A. No. 82/2019III

SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUNAWWAR NASEEM[P-1]VersusGAURAV KANVAR JUNEJA AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

108 Crl.A. No. 1730/2017II-B

VINOBHAI M. P. VINODVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

109 Crl.A. No. 1801/2017II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1]VersusKAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY[R-1]

110 Crl.A. No. 1537/2017II-B

JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA R. C. KOHLI[P-1]Versus

Page 188: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2017II-B

AMARJITSINH ANIRUDHDHSINH JADEJAAND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

111 Crl.A. No. 132/2018II-C

SHRI DEEPAK SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 133/2018II-C

RAJENDER SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY

VersusSTATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2202/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA159123/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 159125/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.4533-4534/2019IV-A

FIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE THROUGH PARTNER HARISHANKAR GOYAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS

CHRISTI JAIN

VersusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[R-4.1]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1072/2018 in C.A. No.2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ABHAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

IN C.A. No. - 2201/2018,ConnectedC.A. No. 722-723/2020IV-A

SURESH KUMAR ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA

VersusFIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE, LASHKAR AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6356/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.6358/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6357/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

113 Crl.A. No. 404/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 405/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31495/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

114 C.A. No. 4418/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX, I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 189: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 7M/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD MANAGINGDIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54053/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54056/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4417/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX 1 DELHI TA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54114/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54115/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

115 C.A. No. 8989/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27976/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9815/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM

116 C.A. No. 2760/2010XIV-A

INDIAN BANK AND ANR. MADHU SIKRI, [P-2]VersusMAHAVEER KHARIWAL VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }

117 Crl.A. No. 900/2010II-C

SHANMUGAM V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:02:54

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 190: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 8HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

NOTE:-ON 09.09.2020

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 8971/2010

XIV-AKIRPA RAM (D) TR.LRS. . AND ANR. P. N. PURIVersus

SURENDER DEO GAUR AND ORS. VISHWA PAL SINGH, ASHWANI KUMARRAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[INT]

2 C.A. No. 4595/2010IX

RAJENDRA . AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDIVersusSUMANTIBAI . AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR JHA, P. SOMA SUNDARAM

3 C.A. No. 8449/2009IX

KRUSHI UTPANNA BAZAR SAMITI ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusVIJAY JANARDHAN GHORLE

4 C.A. No. 8365/2009IV-A

N.VENKATASWAMY REDDY G. N. REDDYVersusASHOK AND ORS. S. N. BHAT, [R-2.1]

5 C.A. No.3523-3526/2010XII

A.R.MADANA GOPAL ETC.ETC. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusM/S RAMNATH PUBLICATIONS P.LTD..AND ANR. ETC. ETC. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

6 C.A. No.4997-4998/2009XII

KARUPPIAH V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusARUMUGAM VIJAY KUMAR

7 C.A. No. 8648/2009III-A

KANPUR ELECT.SUPPLY CO.LTD. DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusASHOK

8 C.A. No. 6145/2010XVII

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD AND ORS. MANISH KUMAR SARAN

VersusM/S RAMAKRISHNA FORGING LIMITED DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

9 C.A. No. 5815/2009XI-A

ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,KOTTAYAM AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusESTHAPPAN CHERIAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

10 C.A. No. 4755/2011IV-A

STATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. GOPAL JHA[P-1][GR]VersusMAHESH KUMAR DAIYA . AND ORS.

Page 191: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8

11 C.A. No. 5261/2011IV-A

M.P.HOUSING BOARDTHR.EXEC.ENGNR.,RATLAM B. S. BANTHIA

VersusDASHRATH PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA

12 C.A. No. 2196/2012III-A

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. ITS SECRETARYAND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],MANJULA GUPTA[R-4], A. V. RANGAM[R-8]

13 C.A. No. 9792/2010IV-A

MADHYA BHARAT GRAMIN BANK SANJAY KAPURVersusPANCHAMLAL YADAV PRACHI BAJPAI[R-1]

14 C.A. No. 5884/2009IV-A

AKKAMMA AND ORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersus

VEMAVATHI AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[IMPL]

15 C.A. No.5033-5034/2009IV-A

K.N.NAGARAJAPPA AND ORS. S. N. BHAT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusH.NARASIMHA REDDY NANITA SHARMA

16 C.A. No.6878-6879/2008XVI

DAMODAR VALLEY CORP. AND ANR. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusRAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS RITESH AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 7547/2008XVI

CHIEF SECRETARY.GOVT.OF WESTBENGAL PARIJAT SINHA, PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

Versus

RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS RITESH AGRAWAL, SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY

ConnectedC.A. No.7548-7551/2008XVI

UOI AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS RITESH AGRAWAL, SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY

17 C.A. No. 7522/2009XVI

SHEO SHANKAR CHEMICALINDUSTRIES LTD. ARUN K. SINHA

VersusMAHENDRA PRASAD SINGH . AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH, SHAKEEL AHMED

18 C.A. No. 4393/2010XIV-A

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM

VersusOM PARKASH

19 C.A. No. 1981/2010IV-A

KRISHI UPPAJ MANDI SAMITI,SHUJALPUR VINAY GARG

VersusRAJKUMAR SINGH VANDANA SHARMA[R-1]

20 C.A. No. 8286/2009XVI

MANORANJAN PRASAD SINGH SATISH VIGVersusBIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ANDORS. NAVIN PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

21 C.A. No. 5788/2012XVI

SECRETARY, MNG. COMMITTEE . ANDANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEE[P-1]

VersusBINATA DAS (MANNA) . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

Page 192: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 822 C.A. No.

1802-1806/2010XI-A

KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VIPIN NAIR[P-1]

Versus

K.N. RADHAMANI AND ORS. ETC. ETC. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER, , V. K. SIDHARTHAN,G. PRAKASH

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 60/2014XVI-A

THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICECOMMISSION THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

VIPIN NAIR[P-1]

VersusYESUDAS, KANNATHAYIL HOUSE,MANGALAM . AND ORS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A.[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2822/2010XI-A

T.N.SADASIVAN AND ORS. USHA NANDINI. V

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI, VIPIN NAIR[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2823/2010XI-A

P.K.ASOKAN AND ANR. USHA NANDINI. V[P-1], [P-2]

VersusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[R-1], [R-2], C. K. SASI[R-1]

23 C.A. No. 6405/2011IV

HARJOT SINGH AMIT PAWANVersus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, ASHWANI BHARDWAJ, UTTARABABBAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

24 C.A. No. 6825/2008IV

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAINVersusHARNAM SINGH(DEAD) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. R. C. KAUSHIK, ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

25 C.A. No. 9343/2010XVI

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD C. L. SAHU[P-1]Versus

TRIPURARI SARAN SHARMA AND ORS. SMARHAR SINGH[R-4], [R-9], T. MAHIPAL,[R-10], [R-11], J. P. DHANDA[R-21]

26 C.A. No. 2925/2010XII

M/S.BLUE DART AVIATION PAREKH & CO.VersusM/S.POLYENE FILM INDUSTRIES ANRANR. AND ANR. V. BALACHANDRAN

27 C.A. No. 8548/2009XII-A

P. ISHWARI BAI ANU GUPTAVersusANJANI BAI AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

28 C.A. No. 5922/2010XIV-A

M/S CONTINENTAL FOUNDATION JOINTVENTURE AND ANR. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI[P-1]

VersusRAM BHAGATI AND ORS.

29 C.A. No. 3657/2010XVI

DEBABRATA SAHA S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]VersusSERAMPORE MUNICIPALITY ANDOTHERS V. D. KHANNA[R-1], RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-3]

30 C.A. No. 9975/2011IV

AMIN CHAND AND ORS. RANI CHHABRAVersusSUKHBIR SINGH P. D. SHARMA

31 C.A. No. 7365/2013IV

SARWAR KUMAR ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAV[P-1]VersusEXEC.ENG.PROVINCIAL DIVISION ANDANR.

SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], MONIKAGUSAIN[R-1]

32 C.A. No. 9143/2012XI-A

K.C.MANOJ A. RAGHUNATH[P-1]Versus

Page 193: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8

MANU M.. AND ORS. GARVESH KABRA[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-2], VIPINNAIR[R-3]

33 C.A. No. 9341/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusBIBHA SINGH SANTOSH MISHRA

34 C.A. No. 5160/2010XII

J.CHITRA SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[P-1]Versus

DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1][GR], [R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4][GR]

35 C.A. No. 3932/2011XI-A

SURESH KUMAR . AND ANR. E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]VersusNOUSHAD . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV[R-1], G. PRAKASH[R-3]

36 C.A. No. 8223/2009XI-A

CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA ANDANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusM.J.JAMES T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

37 C.A. No. 2567/2017IV-A

M.R.VINODA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusM.S.SUSHEELAMMA(D) BY LRS.. ANDORS.

E. C. VIDYA SAGAR, RAJESH MAHALE, AFTABALI KHAN

38 C.A. No. 8887/2011XII

G.R.SELVARAJ (DECEASED) R. AYYAM PERUMALVersusK.J.PRAKASH KUMAR . AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

39 C.A. No. 2806/2010XIV-A

A.BRAJAMANI SHARMA . AND ORS. P. NARASIMHANVersus

L.K.ABUNG RONGMEI . AND ORS.RAJIV MEHTA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-14], [R-15]

FOR APPOINT A GUARDIAN OF A MINOR ON IA 1/2009 FOR ON IA 44303/2009FOR ON IA 14280/2010 FOR ON IA 38399/2011 FOR ON IA 87187/2013

40 C.A. No. 4270/2010XII

MURTHY AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAMVersusC.SARADAMBAL AND ORS. K. K. MANI

41 C.A. No. 468/2010IV-A

B.S.RANGASWAMY S. N. BHAT[P-1]Versus

N. SRINIVAULU AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2], [R-3]

42 C.A. No.11393-11394/2011XII

P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusP. GANESAN AND ORS. AND ORS. M. M. KASHYAP, R. SATHISH

43 C.A. No.8119-8123/2011IV

R.P. BHARDWAJ . AND ORS. AMITA GUPTA

VersusPUNJAB UNIVERSITY AND ANR. GOPAL PRASAD

44 C.A. No. 2647/2017III

LALITKUMAR JIVABHAI THAKKAR ANDANR. NIKHIL GOEL

Versus

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJEEV MALHOTRA, P. SOMA SUNDARAM,VIPIN NAIR[R-5], [R-6]

45 C.A. No. 2777/2010IX

KULDIP SRINIVAS KULKARNI R. R. DESHPANDEVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAREVENUE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2]

Page 194: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 846 C.A. No. 249/2010

IV-AAZGAR BARID (D) BY LRS. LALITA KAUSHIKVersusMAZAMBI @ PYAREMABI . AND ORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

47 C.A. No.4039-4053/2009XI-A

KOMALAN ETC. ETC. HIMINDER LAL[P-1], VISHAL ARUN[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY TAXES(A) DEPARTMENTAND ORS. ETC.

G. PRAKASH[R-1], V. K. BIJU[R-1], NARESHKUMAR[R-1]

I.A. NOS. 1-15 AND 16-30 OF 2013 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION FILEDBY MR. V. K. BIJU, ADVOCATE

ConnectedC.A. No.4581-4593/2010XI-A

SIVARAJAN ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSETC. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 7345/2010XI-A

ASHOKAN HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR, LIZ MATHEW, [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.10054-10057/2010XI-A

PAPPACHAN AND ORS ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSETC. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8506-8508/2009XI-A

SIBIL AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8509/2009XI-A

P.K.SURENDRAN AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.5910-5911/2010XI-A

AJITH AND OTHERS ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.4986-4987/2009XI-A

A.S.JOY, ETC. ETC. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. NARESH KUMAR, G. PRAKASH, [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5391/2009XI-A

BINOY AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARYTAXES (A) DEPARTMENT AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5392/2009XI-A

RAJU . AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

Page 195: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 7650/2009XI-A

RAJESH . AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8337-8339/2009XI-A

PRADEEP AND ANR. ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8652/2009XI-A

GIRISH NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8653/2009XI-A

VIJAYAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.1125-1129/2010XI-A

SEKHARAN AND ORS ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. R. SATHISH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.2245-2251/2010XI-A

GUNASINGH AND ANR. ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4730/2010XI-A

M.R.MUKUNDAN RANJITH K. C.

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR, K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No.2441-2442/2010XI-A

LALU AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.ETC. ANDANR. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.3263-3266/2011II-B

SUDHAKARAN NADUMURI HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA JOGY SCARIA, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5078/2011XI-A

SURENDRAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR, G.PRAKASH

ConnectedC.A. No.7223-7224/2011XI-A

SAHADEVAN AND ORS. ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6760/2012XI-A

SADANANDAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R., NARESH KUMAR

Page 196: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.1233/2016XI-A

SANTHOSH . AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2]

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

48 C.A. No. 4979/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA THE DIRECTOR OFEDUCATION V. G. PRAGASAM[P-1][GR]

VersusR.VANITHA KAMINI JAISWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4981/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REP.BY.SEC.TO GOVT. OF PONDICHERRY V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusGRANDHI GHKS PRABHAKAR AND ORSAND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4980/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusP.SHANTHI YUSUF[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4982/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THEDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusM.SIMEERA A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 4984/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusV.VISHNUDEVI VIJAYAMEENAKSHI.AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 4983/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA REP. BY DIRECTOR OFEDUCATION. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusSINDHU JAYARAJAN

49 C.A. No. 7878/2012III-A

BHATKHANDE MUSIC INSTITUTE ANDANR. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[P-1]

Versus

MANJULA PANT AND ORS.JYOTI MENDIRATTA, [R-1], ATULSHARMA[R-2][PR], SANJAY KUMARTYAGI[R-3][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7879/2012III-A

RUCHI KHARE ATUL SHARMA[P-1]

Versus

MANJULA PANT AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, [R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-4][GR]

50 C.A. No. 253/2011XI-A

C.J.JOSEPH . AND ANR. DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 3778/2010XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusD.SOM AND ORS ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

52 C.A. No.5666-5668/2009XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

VersusM/S UTKAL DISTILLERIES LTD. AFTAB ALI KHAN

53 C.A. No. 3642/2011XVI

KRISHNANAND YADAV AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMADVersusRAMAWATI DEVI (DEAD) THR. LRS. .AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

Page 197: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8

54 C.A. No. 6372/2011XII

THE DISTRICT MANAGER TAMIL NADUSTATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. MONA K. RAJVANSHI

VersusS.KOTTAISAMY R. R. DESHPANDE

ConnectedC.A. No. 6374/2011XII

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TASMACLTD. AND ANR. MONA K. RAJVANSHI[P-1]

VersusP.SURESH NIDHI[R-1]

55 C.A. No. 2990/2011III

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCECORPORATAION REGIONAL DIRECTORAND ORS.

SANJEEV ANAND

VersusK.KHODIDAS PATEL . AND ANR. SHEELA GOEL

56 C.A. No. 8172/2009XIV-A

DHANI RAM AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusSHIV SINGH SUSHIL BALWADA[R-1]

57 C.A. No. 2149/2010IV

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. KARAN BHARIHOKE[P-1]VersusPARAMPRIT SINGH GILL (DEAD) THR.LRS. ARUN K. SINHA[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 8513/2009XI-A

CHANCELLOR, ORISSA UNIVERSITY OFAGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY(OUAT) AND ANR.

C. K. SUCHARITA, [P-2]

VersusPRASANTA KUMAR PRADHAN NAGARKATTI KARTIK UDAY[R-1]

59 Crl.A. No. 212/2012II-B

MITESH @ T.V.VAGHELA BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 03.03.2020 LIST THIS MATTER IN THEMONTH OF AUGUST, 2020

60 C.A. No. 6780/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusBRAJ KISHORE SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 8169/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

RAM LAKHAN SHUKLA AND ORS. SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2]

61 C.A. No. 6041/2015XII

DISCOTONE INDO LTD. A. LAKSHMINARAYANAN[P-1]Versus

CANARA BANK AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1], S.MAHENDRAN[R-1], MANOJ K. MISHRA[R-1]

62 Crl.A. No.618-620/2015II-C

J.M. ARUMUGAM ETC. DEVVRAT[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSTATE REP. BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ANDORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], PROMILA[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.621-622/2015II-C

P. RAVINDRAN DEVVRAT[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], PROMILA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.625-629/2015II-C

S.JAYAPAL AND ORS. DEVVRAT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

Versus

Page 198: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8

I.PERIYASAMY AND ORS.

K. K. MANI[R-3], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-2],[R-4], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-19], SATYAMITRA GARG[R-5][CAVEAT], D.KUMANAN[R-5],PAREKH & CO.[R-1], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12], V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1],[R-16], [R-17], BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-18]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.613-616/2015II-C

STATE REP. BY ITS DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Versus

S.RAGHUPATHY AND ORS. KAUSHAL YADAV, [R-2], [R-4], GEETHAKOVILAN, [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 624/2015II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

VersusM. KULANTHAI AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM, [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 623/2015II-C

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

VersusI. PERIASAMY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 617/2015II-C

THE STATE REP. BY ITS DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Versus

K.N NEHRU AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM, [R-2], D.KUMANAN[R-1],[R-3], [R-7], G. BALAJI[R-4], [R-5]

63 C.A. No.2379-2411/2010XII

NATIONAL SEED CORPORATION LTD. GHANSHYAM JOSHI[P-1]

Versus

M. RAJAMANICKAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-7], [R-10],[R-20], [R-21], [R-22][PR], [R-23][PR],[R-24][PR], [R-25][PR], [R-26][PR], [R-27][PR],[R-28][PR], [R-29][PR], [R-30][PR], [R-31][PR],[R-32][PR], [R-33][PR], [R-34][PR], [R-35][PR],[R-36][PR], [R-37][PR], [R-38][PR], [R-39][PR],PRAGYA BAGHEL[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-6], [R-9],[R-11], [R-13], [R-14], [R-19], NIDHI[R-18][PR]

64 C.A. No.2835-2836/2011IV

LAJJA RAM AND ORS. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusRATI CHAND AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA

65 C.A. No. 2032/2011IV-A

M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES LTD. K. RAJEEV[P-1]VersusM/S. DIVGI METAL WARES EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2035/2011IV-A

DIVGI METAL WEAVERS LTD. K. RAJEEV[P-1]

VersusTHE DIVGI METAL WORKS EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2033/2011IV-A

DIVAGI METAL WARES LTD. K. RAJEEV

VersusDIVGI METAL WORKS EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ORS.

66 C.A. No.7440-7441/2012XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .AND ANR. YOGINDER HANDOO

Versus

MANJU TOMAR AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-11], M. C. DHINGRA[R-6]

Page 199: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.7442-7444/2012XIV-A

DELHI SIKH GURDWARAMGT.COMMITTEE M. C. DHINGRA

Versus

MANJU TOMAR AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-9], [R-11],[R-12], [R-15]

FOR FOR ON IA 1/2016

67 C.A. No. 5500/2011XIV-A

THANESAR SINGH SODHHI (D) THR.LRS. ANZU. K. VARKEY[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 730/2014II-A

SUJATA SANTOSH SHETTY DEEPAK ANAND[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY AND ORS.

68 C.A. No. 1807/2013IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. ARJUN GARG[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SHAMBHOO MARKETING PRIVATELTD. T. MAHIPAL[R-1]

69 C.A. No. 10343/2011XII-A

CMC LIMITED SHRAMAN SINHA[P-1]VersusDEPUTY DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATEINSURANCE CORPORATION VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

70 C.A. No. 7020/2012XII

J.RAJESH(MINOR) THR. HIS MOTHERAND NATURAL GUARDIAN J. GOMATHI ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA[P-1]

VersusM. KUMARAN . AND ORS. K. K. MANI[R-1]

71 C.A. No. 11179/2011XIV-A

TIKKA SHATRUJIT SINGH AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYALVersusSUKJIT SINGH AND ANR. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PAREKH & CO.

72 C.A. No. 8741/2015XII

M.D.,TAMILNADU INDS.INV.CORP.LTD.AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusA. MOHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 8742/2015XII

TAMILNADU INDUST.INVEST.CORP.LTD.REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTRORAND ANR.

G. INDIRA

VersusG.K.ANBU T. HARISH KUMAR

73 C.A. No.7565-7567/2011XI-A

G.P. SANGEETHA AND ORS ETC ETC K. RAJEEV[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9060/2011XI-A

SHARAFAUDEEN M K. RAJEEV[P-1]

Versus

INDU T.K. AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], HARIKUMARV.[R-3]

74 C.A. No. 1626/2015III-A

PRAMOD KUMAR DINESH KUMAR GARGVersusTHE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD. AND ANR. SIDDHARTH MITTAL, SAURABH AJAY GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1627/2015III-A

SHYAM LAL DINESH KUMAR GARG[P-1]

Versus

Page 200: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORYLTD. AND ANR.

SAURABH AJAY GUPTA[R-1], SIDDHARTHMITTAL[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1628/2015III-A

JAI SINGH (D) THRU LRS. AND ORS. DINESH KUMAR GARG[P-1]

VersusTHE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD. AND ANR.

SAURABH AJAY GUPTA[R-1], SIDDHARTHMITTAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1629/2015III-A

VIKRAM SINGH ANIL KUMAR GUPTA-II

VersusM/S PRADHAN PRABHANDHAK KISHANSAHAKARI CHINI MILL AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.18485-18487/2017III-A

JAI PRAKASH SINGH M. A. CHINNASAMY

Versus

DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SANGHLTD. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

75 C.A. No. 8620/2015III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH HOMESECRETARY U.P AND ANR. GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusMOTI LAL

76 C.A. No. 11338/2011XIV-A

THE NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICPOWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO.LTD.) AND ORS.

NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusSHRI MADAN OWARY RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 1019/2013XVI

SHANTI DEVI AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA[P-1]VersusBISHUNDHARI PRASAD AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

78 Crl.A. No. 1537/2014II

KRISHNA SHANKAR MEHTA C. L. SAHU[P-1][PR]VersusSTATE ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1][GR]

79 Crl.A. No. 1016/2013II-A

DILIP KUMAR CHATURBEDI VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1]

80 Crl.A. No. 2038/2013II-C

MANOJ KUMAR SURESHAN P.[P-1]VersusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

81 C.A. No.3989-4000/2012XI-A

PARADIP PORT TRUST NIRNIMESH DUBE

Versus

NILAKANTHA PANDA . AND ORS. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI, S. N. BHAT, AJAYCHOUDHARY

82 C.A. No. 9649/2013III-A

DR. KUHU DUTTAGUPTA VINEET BHAGAT[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.DIRECTOR AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

83 C.A. No. 5415/2015XII

VIJAYARANGAM SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusUNNAMALAI @ BABY A. SUMATHI

84 C.A. No. 3191/2016XV

MANOJ KUMAR NIMORIYA AND ANR.AND ANR. KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-2],SURYA KANT[R-3]

Page 201: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 3192/2016XV

MAHESH KUMAR VERMA SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], SURYA KANT[R-2],ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-3], SHOBHA GUPTA[R-4],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-12], [R-13]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3193/2016XV

RAKESH JEENGAR SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.SECRETARY AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR, SURYA KANT[R-2]

85 Crl.A. No. 673/2014II-A

WESTERN MAHARASHTRADEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ANDORS.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-2]

86 C.A. No. 4059/2015XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]VersusR.K SHARMA BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

87 C.A. No.1068-1069/2017XIV-A

ALL INDIA CPWD ENGG.ASSOCIATIONAND ANR. SUDHIR NAAGAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

88 Crl.A. No. 609/2015II

INDRAJIT DAS MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-09-2020 } [ FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS ]

89 C.A. No.10302-10303/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE REP BY SECRETARY ANDANR.

SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusD. PALANIAPPAN

90 C.A. No. 3667/2018XII

SACHIDHANANDAM BALAJI SRINIVASANVersusE VANAJA AND ORS. AND ORS. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

ConnectedDiary No. 7823-2018XII

E. VANAJA M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

VersusSACHIDANANDAM AND ORS.IA No.42022/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING[TO BE TAKEN UPALONGWITH ITEM NO. 10 I.E. SLP (c) NO. 22155/2014]

91 C.A. No. 6611/2015XVI

JYOTIRMAY RAY IRSHAD AHMADVersusFIELD GENERAL MANAGER, PUNJABNATIONAL BANK AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.

92 C.A. No. 4260/2015XVII

MAJOR GENERAL ANIL SARUP (RETD.) MOHIT D. RAMVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

93 C.A. No. 8304/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusSHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH AND ANR. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]

94 C.A. No. 8253/2015III-A

ST. JOSHEPHS COLLEGE AND ANR. MOHIT PAULVersusSMT. SHEHERNAZ GANDHI AND ORS. BHAGABATI PRASAD PADHY

Page 202: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3446/2018XI

RAJVIR SINGH YADAV AND ORS. MEERA AGARWAL

VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137784/2017-APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION and IA No.137783/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.137779/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP and IA No.137787/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

95 C.A. No. 1347/2017XIV-A

THE MANAGEMENT OF RAMJAS PUBLICSCHOOL GAURAV KEJRIWAL

VersusDHARMENDER KUMAR . AND ORS. PRANAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA, P. N. PURIand IA No.87668/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONFOR ON IA 1/2016 FOR ON IA2/2016 FOR ON IA 3/2016 FOR ON IA 4/2016 FOR ON IA 5/2016 FOR ON IA 6/2016FOR ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 8/2016MATTER WAS DIRECTED TO BE LISTEDAFTER 20 DAYS AS PER COURTS ORDER DATED 22.3.2017

96 C.A. No. 14524/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusAIR COMMODORE NK SHARMA RABIN MAJUMDER[CAVEAT]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015

97 C.A. No. 719-721/2016III

RAKESH RAI POOJA DHAR[P-1]VersusM/S. NATIONAL AVIATION CO. OF INDIALTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

MUDIT SHARMA[R-1]

98 C.A. No.1967-1968/2016XVII

WING COMMANDER (RETD.) RAVIKUMAR SHEKHAR KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

99 C.A. No.2592-2593/2016XVI

PANCHANAND SAH AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], GAURAVAGRAWAL[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1],RAJNISH KUMAR JHA[R-6], ADITYASINGH[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.2594-2595/2016XVI

BRAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. SANTOSH MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPINGUPTA[R-1], RAJNISH KUMAR JHA[R-11],[R-31], [R-39], CHANDAN KUMAR[R-15],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-1], [R-13], [R-17], [R-24],[R-26], [R-27]

LIST FOR FINAL HEARING IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2019 ALONGWITHCONNECTED MATTERS VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 3.5.2019

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3757-3758/2017XVI

SATISH DAS (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2017

100 C.A. No. 2438/2016XVII

BHAGWAN SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusUNION OF INDIA ETC.

Page 203: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8

101 C.A. No. 3338/2016III

SINDHUDURG ZILLA SHIKSHANSANSTHA CHALAK MANDAL,(REGISTERED) THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

ANAGHA S. DESAI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,, GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3337/2016III

SINDHUDURG ZILLA SHIKSHANSANSTHA CHALAK MANDAL, PANDUR(REGISTERED) THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARYSCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTSDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,, SUNIL KUMAR VERMA, DILIP ANNASAHEBTAUR, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2408/2018IX

AZAD EDUCATION SOCIETY MIRAJPRESIDENT RAHUL JOSHI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2], ASHA GOPALANNAIR[R-3]DINESH RATTAN BHARDWAJ[INT]

ONLY IA No.3894/2019 (FOR INTERVENTION) AND & I.A NO. 3895/2019 (FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O/T) IN SLP (C) NO. 2408/2018 TO BE LISTED FORORDERS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29013/2018IX

ANJUMAN ISHAAT E TALEEM TRUST SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. RAHUL JOSHI[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1379/2018X

AL SABAH EDUCATION AND WELFARESOCIETY AND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-2]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 164702/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3972/2020IX

AYESHA EDUCATION AND WELFARETRUST AND ANR. BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.IA No.20128/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.20130/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.20126/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IANo.20134/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTSand IA No.20129/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

102 C.A. No. 7390/2016XI-A

PRAFULLA KUMAR SAHU (DEAD) THR.LRS. AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA

Versus

SHAKUNTALA SAHOO . AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

103 C.A. No. 11721/2018IV

M/S INDUCTION FURNACEASSOCIATION OF NORTH INDIA MOHIT D. RAM

VersusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED AND ORS.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA, KARUNAKARMAHALIK

Page 204: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.11722-11723/2018IV

RANJEEV ALLOYS LTD. AND ANR. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED (PSPCL) AND ORS.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA[R-1], KARUNAKARMAHALIK[R-3]

FOR

104 C.A. No. 9197/2017XVII

KARNATAKA STATE PLASTICASSOCIATION KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORSDEPARTMENT OF FORESTENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY ANDORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 18313/2017XVII

CANARA PLASTICS MANUFACTURESAND TRADERS ASSOCIATION KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[R-4]

105 C.A. No. 2285/2018IV-A

AJAY KUMAR JAIN RAKHI RAYVersusBILASPUR RAIPUR KSHETRIYA GRAMINBANK AND ORS. AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

106 Crl.A. No.901-902/2019II-B

RAJPUT DALA SAVA AND ORS. GAURAV KHANNA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 13.05.2019 LET THE APPEALS BE LISTEDAFTER THE SUMMER VACATION, 2019.

107 W.P.(C) No. 1043/2018X

JAYANT KUMAR CHANDUBHAI PATEL PREM PRAKASHVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:03:21

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 205: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 9HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

NOTE:-[ FOR 09.09.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 6209/2010

IV-ABAJRANGA (DEAD) BY LRS. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

2 Crl.A. No. 1444/2009II-B

RAJENDRA SINGH @ MONU AND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1445/2009II-B

BIKRAM SINGH BAKSHI @ LUPPI ANDANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2010II-B

B.RAMBABU KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2227/2009II-B

SANJAY THAKUR @ RAM NARESH T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2228-2230/2009II-B

R.CHINNI @ R.RAMBABU AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1824/2009II-B

B.SRINIVAS RAO @ SINU AND ANR. KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

3 C.A. No. 7311/2009IV-A

ABIDA SULTAN MEERA MATHURVersus

H.P.SHERIFF (DEAD) BY LRS.ANJANI KUMAR JHA, [R-1.3.5], [R-1.2.1],[R-1.3.4], [R-1.3.3], [R-1.6], [R-1.3.2], [R-1.5],[R-1.3.1], [R-1.1], [R-1.2.4], [R-1.2.3], [R-1.4.1],[R-1.2.2]

list before the court as per Ld. registrar's order dated 27.08.20194 C.A. No. 10694/2011

XIIB.RAMKUMAR V. G. PRAGASAMVersusR.KRISHNAMOORTHY AND ORS. ANDORS. VIJAY KUMAR

Page 206: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 95 C.A. No. 9132/2017

XIIPREMAVATHI AND OTHERS AND ORS. P. SOMA SUNDARAMVersusSUNDARARAJAN AND OTHERS ANDORS. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

6 C.A. No. 5720/2012XVII

NAIN SINGH @ NANDEO SINGH ANDORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA

Versus

RAJMUNI DEVI . AND ORS. GOPAL PRASAD, ANIL K. JHA, MUKTICHAUDHRY[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

7 C.A. No. 7427/2011IV

PUNJAB STATE CO-OP MILKPROD.FED.LTD ASHOK K. MAHAJAN[P-1]

Versus

BALBIR KUMAR WALIA HIMINDER LAL[R-1], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7429/2011IV

PUNJAB STATE CO-OP MILKPROD.FED.LTD. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusRAJINDER SINGH PARMAR ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7430/2011IV

PUNJAB STATE MILK PROD.FEDN ANDANR. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusJ.K.KOHLI AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL, KAVEETA WADIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7431/2011IV

PUNJAB STATECOOP.MK.PROD.FEDN.LTD. AND ORS. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

Versus

K.L.ARORA AND ORS. R. C. KOHLI, KAVEETA WADIA, ANKITGOEL[R-9], [R-10], [R-16]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7432/2011IV

PUNJAB STATE CO-OP MILK PROD.FEDLTD. AND ANR. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusKULWANT SINGH AND ORS. S. C. PATEL

ConnectedC.A. No. 7433/2011IV

PUNJAB STATE CO-OP MILKPROD.FEDN.LTD. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

Versus

HARI RAM GARG AND ORS. KAVEETA WADIA, ANKIT GOEL[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7434/2011IV

M.D.,PB.STATE COOP.MILK PRO.FED.AND ORS. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusKAMIKAR SINGH AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 7435/2011IV

M.D.,PUNJAB STATECOOP.MILK.PRO.FED. AND ORS. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusJASBIR SINGH

8 C.A. No. 10330/2011XII

P.S. GANDHILINGAM AND ORS. ANDORS. L. K. PANDEY

VersusM. JAYASELVAM AND ORS. AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI

9 C.A. No. 9453/2010IV

KARTAR SINGH A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusPUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. NARESH BAKSHI

10 Crl.A. No. 1392/2011II-C

CHUNTHURAM YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHANTH PATIL[R-1][ REMAIN ON BOARD ]

Page 207: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 911 C.A. No. 7090/2011

IVSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]VersusPURAN CHAND AKSHAY VERMA[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 13/2012XII-A

V. RAJA SEKHAR PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1], ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusTHE SPECIAL COURT (CONSTITUTEDUNDER A.P. LAND GRABBINGPROHIBITION ACT

CHANDRA PRAKASH[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[CAVEAT], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2049/2013XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusS. NARASIMHULU NAIDU (DEADTHROUGH LRS.) AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[CAVEAT], [R-2],ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

13 C.A. No. 9702/2014III-A

S.MANJEET SINGH . AND ANR. T. MAHIPALVersusBRIJ BALA JAIN LALIT KUMAR

14 C.A. No. 5697/2015III

REGIONAL TEXTILE COMMISSIONERAND ORS. SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDHANIRAM RAMCHANDRA

15 Crl.A. No. 1493/2014II

JALLU MD. FARMAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7753/2017

16 C.A. No. 1490/2017III

SHANTABAI TARACHAND PARDESHISINCE DECEASED THR. LRS SHRILAXMAN TARACHND PARDESH ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL

VersusSAYYAD MURTUZA SAYYAD ALI SINCEDECEASED THRO. LRS AND OTHERS VIKAS MEHTA

List the appeal itself alongwith the pending applications vide Hon'ble Court's orderdt.14.8.2018

17 C.A. No. 7198/2015XII

K S SAVARINATHAN K. V. MOHANVersusSEETHALAKSHMI RAJESH KUMAR

18 C.A. No. 7570/2019III

SHRADHA SHEKHAR KARPE M. Y. DESHMUKHVersusSHEKHAR BHIMRAO KARPE RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[R-1]

19 C.A. No. 517-518/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURIVersus

MANPREET SINGH POONAM AND ANR. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON, MONIKA GUSAIN,BINU TAMTA

20 Crl.A. No. 753/2017II

ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND . ANDORS. ABHISHEK GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[INT]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 756/2017II

RAMNARAYAN ANAND MISHRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 75421/2019

Page 208: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedCrl.A. No.754-755/2017II

HARLAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-2],[R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11]

21 Crl.A. No.1302-1304/2015II-C

MALKAJAPPA ETC. VIKAS UPADHYAY

VersusSHARANU AND ANR. SHAILESH MADIYAL

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.7042-7044/2016II-C

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

SHARANU AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYALFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 14367/2016

22 C.A. No.3761-3763/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY RUCHIRA GOEL[P-1]

VersusDHARMENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYAAND ORS ETC

AJAY KUMAR TALESARA[R-1], ASHA GOPALANNAIR[R-2]

23 C.A. No. 9444/2016XIV-A

ABID-UL-ISLAM P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]VersusINDER SAIN DUA RESPONDENT-IN-PERSONI.A. No. 48977/2017 Permission to Place on Record Subsequent facts I.A. No.68038/2017 Exemption from filing O.T.

24 C.A. No. 9195/2018XV

MOHAN LAL SHOBHA GUPTAVersusBHOORI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) THR.LRS AND ORS. ANUJ BHANDARI

25 Crl.A. No. 231/2017II-B

K.K. VASHISHT RISHI MALHOTRAVersus

MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN[R-2], RAHUL BHATIA[R-3], [R-4],GAGAN GUPTA[R-5]

26 C.A. No.8618-8619/2019XIV-A

PURUSHOTAM DUTT TUSHAR BAKSHI

Versus

CHANDERLEKHA AND ORS. ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-2], RADHIKAGAUTAM[R-3], VINOD KUMAR TEWARI[R-1]

27 C.A. No. 7024/2019III

SAGAR CO OPERATIVE HOUSINGSOCIETY LIMITED PRADEEP MISRA

VersusDR. ADRIANO AFONSO (SINCEDECEASED THORUGH LRS) AND ORS. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[R-1.1]

28 C.A. No. 5909/2019III-A

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusSANJAY RAI M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1]

29 C.A. No.4401-4402/2018XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

Versus

LICHU BALA GHARA AND ORS. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1], PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

30 C.A. No. 6392/2019XII

SAM ALBERT P. V. YOGESWARANVersusSHOBANA

Page 209: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS

COURT NO. : 9

31 C.A. No. 8564/2015IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. ARJUN GARG[P-1]

VersusAMIT SHRIVAS RONAK KARANPURIA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 } As per R/p dt. 28.8.2020, appeal to be listedon 9.9.2020.

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:03:51

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 210: main.sci.gov.in...2020/09/08  · SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS