Magnetism: Spin-orbit coupling magnetic exchange and ... · Magnetism: Spin-orbit coupling magnetic...
Transcript of Magnetism: Spin-orbit coupling magnetic exchange and ... · Magnetism: Spin-orbit coupling magnetic...
Magnetism:
Spin-orbit coupling magnetic exchange and
anisotropy
VASP workshopRennes – 2016
Xavier RocquefelteInstitut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes
(UMR 6226) Université de Rennes 1, FRANCE
INTRODUCTION
Magnetic properties:
ü Spin-state (high/low) ü Long-range/short-range orders ü Collinear / non-collinear ü Magnetic anisotropy ü Magnetic frustration ü Magnetic exchange
Energy scale (eV) 100 10-3 10-6
Spin-State Magnetic exchange Long-range order
Magnetic anisotropy
INTRODUCTION
Paramagnetic(PM)
Ferrimagneticorder
Ferromagnetic(FM) order
Antiferromagnetic(AFM) order
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
PM without long range interaction
Magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic (FM) compound
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
PM without long range interaction
Magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic (FM) compound
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
PM without long range interaction
Magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic (FM) compound
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
PM without long range interaction
Magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic (FM) compound
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
JF
PM without long range interaction
Magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic (FM) compound
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
Magnetic susceptibility of an antiferromagnetic (AFM) compound
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,02
0,03
0,04
PM without long-range interactions
0,01
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
Magnetic susceptibility of an antiferromagnetic (AFM) compound
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,02
0,03
0,04
PM without long-range interactions
0,01
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
Magnetic susceptibility of an antiferromagnetic (AFM) compound
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
0
0,02
0,03
0,04
AF
PM without long-range interactions
0,01 JAF
PM
COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)
F
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
PM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
χmol(emu/mol)0,02
AF0,01
PM
TC TNCurie temperature Néel temperature
Ferromg order↑ when kT ↓
Antiferromagnetic Ferromagnetic
JF JAF
Ferromagnetic exchange: JF < 0 Antiferromagnetic exchange: JAF > 0
NON-COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
AFM with 2 subnetworks having different
magnetization directions
⇒ weak ferromagnetism
Frustrated AFM
Topologic frustration FM-AFM competition
?J1 J1
J2
?J1 : FM J2 : AFM
NON-COLLINEAR MAGNETISM
AFM with 2 subnetworks having different
magnetization directions
⇒ weak ferromagnetism
Frustrated AFM
Topologic frustration FM-AFM competition
?J1 J1
J2
?J1 : FM J2 : AFM
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Ni2+: d8 electronic configuration Octahedral environment
Rock-salt structure Space group: Fm-3m (#225)
Optical gap: 4-4.3 eV
Magnetic properties: • AFM order • µ(Ni) = 1.7-1.9 µB
Experiment data:
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Ni2+: d8 electronic configuration Octahedral environment
Rock-salt structure Space group: Fm-3m (#225)
Optical gap: 4-4.3 eV
Magnetic properties: • AFM order • µ(Ni) = 1.7-1.9 µB
Experiment data:
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
2 x 2 x 2 supercell
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Exercises: • GGA calculations for AFM and FM orders • GGA+U calculations for AFM and FM orders
Comparison: • Density of states • Total energy • Estimation of magnetic exchange
POSCAR
Ni
O
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
INCAR: GGA - AFM
KPOINTS:
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
OSZICAR Total magnetic moment in the cell
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Integration of magnetic moment in the PAW sphere (LORBIT = 11 in INCAR file)
OUTCAR
Ni1: 1.34 µB
Ni2: -1.34 µB
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
KPOINTS:
8 8 8
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
8 8 8
AND INCAR
… ICHARG = 11 ISMEAR = -5 NEDOS = 1000 EMIN = -10 ; EMAX = 15 …
KPOINTS:
GGA: too small band gap compared to exp. values
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
OUTCAR
NiO - GGA - AFM
Ni1: 1.24 µB
Ni2: -1.24 µB
Exp.: ±1.7-1.9 µB
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
INCAR: GGA - FM
KPOINTS:
8 8 8
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
OUTCAR
NiO - GGA - FM
Ni1: 1.06 µB
Ni2: 1.06 µB
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
INCAR: GGA+U - AFM
Ueff = U – J = 5 eV
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
Better k-mesh Higher NEDOS value …
NiO - GGA+U - AFM
Ni1: 1.67 µB
Ni2: -1.67 µB Exp.: ±1.7-1.9 µB
Illustration of a collinear calculation: NiO
NiO – GGA+U - FM
Ni1: 1.73 µB
Ni2: 1.73 µB
Oxygen magnetic moment…
Estimation of magnetic exchange?
Estimation of magnetic coupling parameters
Estimation of J can be done by mapping energy differences onto the general Heisenberg Spin Hamiltonian:
H = H0 + Jij!Si.
i< j∑
!Sj
Jij: spin exchange parameter between the
spin sites i and j
Jij > 0 ⇒ AFM Jij < 0 ⇒ FM
Long-range order
Estimation of J can be done by mapping energy differences onto the general Heisenberg Spin Hamiltonian:
H = H0 + Jij!Si.
i< j∑
!Sj
Jij: spin exchange parameter between the
spin sites i and j
Jij > 0 ⇒ AFM Jij < 0 ⇒ FM
Long-range order
Eα = α H α = E0 +S2 Jiji< j∑ σ iσ j
S: Spin hold by the magnetic center
σi = ±1 (up or down spin)
Estimation of magnetic coupling parameters
Estimation of J can be done by mapping energy differences onto the general Heisenberg Spin Hamiltonian:
H = H0 + Jij!Si.
i< j∑
!Sj
Jij: spin exchange parameter between the
spin sites i and j
Jij > 0 ⇒ AFM Jij < 0 ⇒ FM
Long-range order
Eα = α H α = E0 +S2 Jiji< j∑ σ iσ j
S: Spin hold by the magnetic center
σi = ±1 (up or down spin)
Example of a spin-half dimer (S = ½) To estimate the J12 value, 2 total energy calculations are needed:
EFM = E0 +14J12 EAFM = E0 +−
14J12
J12 = 2 EFM −EAFM( )σ1 = +1 σ2 = +1 σ1 = +1 σ2 = -1
Estimation of magnetic coupling parameters
Ni2+ -> S = 1
Eα = α H α = E0 +S2 Jiji< j∑ σ iσ j
2 inequivalent Ni sites in the rhombohedral unit cell (S.G. R-3m)
Estimation of J in NiO
J: magnetic coupling defined by Ni1-O-Ni2 path (angle : 180°)
6J / unit cell
Ni2+ -> S = 1
Eα = α H α = E0 +S2 Jiji< j∑ σ iσ j
2 inequivalent Ni sites in the rhombohedral unit cell (S.G. R-3m)
Estimation of J in NiO
J: magnetic coupling defined by Ni1-O-Ni2 path (angle : 180°)
6J / unit cell
EFM = E0 + 6JEAFM = E0 − 6J-19.54909823 eV -19.30675287 eV
Ni2+ -> S = 1
Eα = α H α = E0 +S2 Jiji< j∑ σ iσ j
2 inequivalent Ni sites in the rhombohedral unit cell (S.G. R-3m)
Estimation of J in NiO
J: magnetic coupling defined by Ni1-O-Ni2 path (angle : 180°)
6J / unit cell
EFM = E0 + 6JEAFM = E0 − 6J
J = (EFM −EAFM ) /12 = 20.2 meV-19.54909823 eV -19.30675287 eV
Exp.: J = 19.01 meV (Hutchings M. T., Samuelsen E. J., Phys. Rev. B 6, 9, 1972, 3447)
Collinear magnetism in VASP
Spin-polarized calculation: ISPIN = 2 Initial magnetic moment: MAGMOM = 2.0 2.0 2*0
INCAR file
Warning:
• Too small initial magnetic moments will/may lead to a non-magnetic solution • Badly initialized calculations take longer to converge (local minima)
• Convergency of k-mesh, ENCUT and choice of POTCAR… • Comparing the total energies from calculations with different Ueff values is
meaningless!
VASP can also treat non-collinear magnetic systems!
Noncollinear magnetism in VASP
Replace ISPIN = 2 and MAGMOM = 1.0 by:
INCAR file Illustration with fcc Ni
leads to
or with MAGMOM = 1.0 0.0 0.0
or with MAGMOM = 0.0 1.0 0.0
Estimation of the Magneto-crystalline Anisotropy Energy (MAE) of CuO
Allows to define the magnetization
easy and hard axes
Here we have considered the following expression:
MAE = E[u v w] – E[easy axis]
[1] X. Rocquefelte, P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, S. Kumar, J. van den Brink, Nature Comm. 4, 2511 (2013)
Estimation of the magnetic anisotropy
MAE (μeV)
Magnetization axis
Hard axis
Easy axis
Hard axis
E[uvw] is the energy deduced from spin-orbit calculations with the magnetization along the [uvw]
crystallographic direction
NEED TO SWITCH ON THE SPIN-ORBIT: LSORBIT = .TRUE
Estimation of the Magneto-crystalline Anisotropy Energy (MAE) of CuO
E[uvw] is the energy deduced from spin-orbit calculations with the magnetization along the [uvw]
crystallographic direction
[101]
[-101]
[10-1]
[0-10][-10-1][010]
[1] X. Rocquefelte, P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, S. Kumar, J. van den Brink, Nature Comm. 4, 2511 (2013)
Estimation of the magnetic anisotropy
Allows to define the magnetization
easy and hard axes
Here we have considered the following expression:
MAE = E[u v w] – E[easy axis]
Estimation of the magnetic anisotropy
LiNbO3-type InFeO3: Room-Temperature Polar Magnet without Second-Order Jahn Teller Active Ions Fujita, T. Kawamoto, I. Yamada, O. Hernandez, N. Hayashi, H. Aakamatsu, W. Lafargue-Dit-Hauret, X. Rocquefelte, M. Fukuzumi, P. Manuel, A. J. Studer, C. Knee, K. Tanaka Chemistry of Materials accepted (2016).
AND MORE…
VASP allows to constrain the magnetic moment using the following lines in INCAR:
u Switch on constraints on magnetic moments
u Integration radius to determine local moments
u Weight in penalty function u Target direction
A penalty function is added to the system which drives the integrated local moments into the desired direction
Warning:
The penalty function contributes to the total energy.
AND MORE…
If convergence is bad?
Let’s now play with VASP